Citations - Science topic

I am experiencing difficulty putting citations in author-year format. The Template says it uses natbib for author-year citations. However, when I use \citet{ID number}, It shows question mark in front of authors name.

Example:

Recently, a generalised neural network model was proposed by (author?) [1] for solving partial differential equations

The error is: Package natbib Warning: Author undefined for citation`raissi_physics-informed_2019' on page 2 on input line 134.

Template: https://www.overleaf.com/latex/templates/springer-nature-latex-template/gsvvftmrppwq

My reference:

@article{raissi_physics-informed_2019,

title = {Physics-informed neural networks: {A} deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations},

volume = {378},

issn = {0021-9991},

shorttitle = {Physics-informed neural networks},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999118307125},

doi = {10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045},

abstract = {We introduce physics-informed neural networks – neural networks that are trained to solve supervised learning tasks while respecting any given laws of physics described by general nonlinear partial differential equations. In this work, we present our developments in the context of solving two main classes of problems: data-driven solution and data-driven discovery of partial differential equations. Depending on the nature and arrangement of the available data, we devise two distinct types of algorithms, namely continuous time and discrete time models. The first type of models forms a new family of data-efficient spatio-temporal function approximators, while the latter type allows the use of arbitrarily accurate implicit Runge–Kutta time stepping schemes with unlimited number of stages. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated through a collection of classical problems in fluids, quantum mechanics, reaction–diffusion systems, and the propagation of nonlinear shallow-water waves.},

language = {en},

urldate = {2022-01-31},

journal = {Journal of Computational Physics},

author = {Raissi, M. and Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G. E.},

month = feb,

year = {2019},

keywords = {Data-driven scientific computing, Machine learning, Nonlinear dynamics, Predictive modeling, Runge–Kutta methods},

pages = {686--707},

file = {ScienceDirect Snapshot:/home/hell/Zotero/storage/62WUGXLX/S0021999118307125.html:text/html},

}

Hello everyone, I would like to ask how can I send a text message to ResearchGate management to inform them about my citations? They did not add it even though it was added to Scopus and Google Scholar a long time ago.

How can I ? need to renew my cv and need list of my publications and citations

Science Citation Index (SCI) and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) are both considered gold standards for scientific research. SCI journals are generally considered more prestigious and have higher impact factors than SCIE journals, but SCIE journals are more comprehensive.

How to increase Researchers' citations.

Unlock the power of knowledge and contribute to the advancement of cybersecurity research by citing papers from ARIS2 - Advanced Research in Information Systems Security.

As a free and open-access journal, ARIS2 relies on citations to sustain its vital mission of disseminating cutting-edge research and fostering innovation in information security. Your citation not only acknowledges the contributions of researchers but also strengthens the visibility and impact of ARIS2 within the academic community. Join us in shaping the future of cybersecurity by citing ARIS2 papers in your work today.

I need the citations of my publications cited by other authors

Dear all,

I would like to share with you publishing opportunities in our journal, Ecosystem Services, a Q1 journal, with an impact factor 2023 of 7.6, according to the 2023 Journal Citations Report and 12.5 CitiScore (SCOPUS). We have currently 3 Special Issues (SI) open for submissions:

The scope and full information can be found here:

Regards

Luis

Hello Everyone,

It is part of the dogma of verbotonalism that if you fix the intonation of an L2 you also automatically fix the pronunciation of all/most/many individual sounds. While I think from observation and results reported over the years in many places that this is true, I still have a question.

Has any study been done *with hard statistical data* to demonstrate that this is so? I am looking for something other than impressionistic data. And if such studies exist, please provide the citation if possible. I have no memory of such studies.

Since the Revue de Phonétique Appliquée disappeared a huge amount of publications on VT has also disappeared. I will try a closer look at Govor but I thought I would ask anyway.

Thank you!

Andrew

I had 793 citations as scored by ResearchGate, and I received email notification of a new citation, which should have been 794. No, it reads ZERO!

Hi! There was some kind of glitch on my ResearchGate page: the citations of my 104 articles, books and other publications suddenly turned out to be zero (see screenshot). What's reason of this surprise?

Regards, Dr. Mikhail Pletnev

I have a question about article citations. Now all citations disappeared from my profile.

Let me know how to solve this problem.

Sukhumpong Channuwong

H-INDEX & CITATION EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMICIANS, HOW MUCH RELIABLE !?

Why my citations appears as zero although my Research interest score 299 and H-index 13 and last time I have seen it was 425?

Today I checked my RG profile because it notified me of a new citation, however, when I entered my profile, I found that the citation statistic is at 0 (previously I had close to 1000 citations). Has this happened to anyone else?

Today I found a very strange thing in my research gate account..it showing Citations -0..However, I saw more than 150 Citations last week..Dose anyone know how to fix it ??

Dear Sir/ Madam

Today I was shocked as I saw the citation of my articles become zero, which was 101 in the morning, given that there are citations for each articles individually

What is the cause of that?

Best Regards

Dr. Haidar A Abdulamir

after 81 reads the article ,why i didnot have any citation . what is the diffrence between read and citation ?.how to improve that.

am trying to make POSCAR file and xyz file using vasp for NbReSi compound using VESTA. However, I notice that the number of atoms for xyz file is given as 41 whereas for POSCAR is it 36. Can anyone kind to explain why there is the difference? The cif file is given here.

#(C) 2023 by FIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure. All rights reserved.

data_600059-ICSD

_database_code_ICSD 600059

_audit_creation_date 2013-02-01

_audit_update_record 2019-08-01

_chemical_name_common 'Niobium rhenium silicide (1/1/1)'

_chemical_formula_structural 'Nb Re Si'

_chemical_formula_sum 'Nb1 Re1 Si1'

_chemical_name_structure_type TiFeSi

_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn 11.45

_citation_title

;

Structure and superconductivity studies on ternary equiatomic silicides, MM'Si

;

_publ_section_comment 'Cell and Type only determined'

loop_

_citation_id

_citation_journal_full

_citation_year

_citation_journal_volume

_citation_page_first

_citation_page_last

_citation_journal_id_ASTM

primary 'Bulletin of Materials Science' 1985 7 215 228 BUMSDW

loop_

_citation_author_citation_id

_citation_author_name

primary 'Subba Rao, G.V.'

primary 'Wagner, K.'

primary 'Balakrishnan, Geetha'

primary 'Janaki, J.'

primary 'Paulus, W.'

primary 'Schoellhorn, R.'

primary 'Subramanian, V.S.'

primary 'Poppe, U.'

_cell_length_a 7.070(5)

_cell_length_b 11.442(5)

_cell_length_c 6.606(5)

_cell_angle_alpha 90.

_cell_angle_beta 90.

_cell_angle_gamma 90.

_cell_volume 534.39

_cell_formula_units_Z 12

_space_group_name_H-M_alt 'I m a 2'

_space_group_IT_number 46

loop_

_space_group_symop_id

_space_group_symop_operation_xyz

1 'x+1/2, -y, z'

2 '-x+1/2, y, z'

3 '-x, -y, z'

4 'x, y, z'

5 'x, -y+1/2, z+1/2'

6 '-x, y+1/2, z+1/2'

7 '-x+1/2, -y+1/2, z+1/2'

8 'x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2'

loop_

_atom_type_symbol

_atom_type_oxidation_number

Re0+ 0

Nb0+ 0

Si0+ 0

loop_

_atom_site_label

_atom_site_type_symbol

_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity

_atom_site_Wyckoff_symbol

_atom_site_fract_x

_atom_site_fract_y

_atom_site_fract_z

_atom_site_B_iso_or_equiv

_atom_site_occupancy

Re1 Re0+ 4 a 0 0 0.2501 . 1.

Re2 Re0+ 8 c 0.0295 0.3764 0.12 . 1.

Nb1 Nb0+ 4 b 0.25 0.2004 0.2964 . 1.

Nb2 Nb0+ 4 b 0.25 0.7793 0.2707 . 1.

Nb3 Nb0+ 4 b 0.25 0.9979 0.9178 . 1.

Si1 Si0+ 4 b 0.25 0.9747 0.5055 . 1.

Si2 Si0+ 8 c 0.006 0.1675 0.9953 . 1.

#End of TTdata_600059-ICSD

How do I obtain a citation count for my publications?

Dear Prof,

Greetings .....

I'm Sebastian, would like to do research on paper publication and its impact in the ResearchGate database, like Web of Science and Scopus. So if you all have any idea or any direction, please suggest.

Thanks in Advance

My EndNote library doesn't allow me to add more than 10 references. "You have reached the maximum limit..." it frequently said. Thus, I am obliged to create too many "My EndNote Library enl" by renaming it which is very disgusting task. I have created too many EndNote Libraries to cite sources in in-text citation. In the display of EndNote library, there are not always more than 10 references in "All references". Please, help me how to fix such challenge.

كيف يمكن عمل استشهاد/ اقتباس لبحث معين موجود علي الموقع ؟

Hi Representative of ResearchGate;

My article "Eating Disorders: Diagnosis and Prosthodontic Management" pubished on BAOJ Dentistry, 2017 has four citation on Website.

These are the articles that cited my publication:

a) Eating disorders: Condition of interest to a restoring dentist: A narrative review Ivy Coutinho1 , Kathleen Manuela D’souza2*, Meena Ajay Aras. International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry2019.

b) Influence of a retentive shoulder design to prevent early failure of three core build-ups

ED Bonilla, CH Pameijer, C Nascimento… - Brazilian Dental Journal 2019

c) Impact of Eating Disorders on Oral Health (Thesis) by Menaya, Julio Rojas,  Egas Moniz School of Health & Science (Portugal) ProQuest Dissertations Publishing,  2020

d) Tratamiento odontológico del paciente con anorexia y bulimia (Thesis)

Author/sPalacios Delgado, María Eugenia Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Estomatología Publication Date 2020 Deposit Date 2021-02-25 Academic Title Universidad de Sevilla. Grado en Odontología

Please do the correction of my citation of my manuscript on ResearchGate account.

Thank you.

Esteban D. Bonilla DDS

Lecturer/Researcher

Chair of Morphology and Occlusion

Restorative Dentistry

UCLA School of Dentistry

Hello all,

I'm curious about theories of gravitation that are based upon aether theory. I know that the theory of the aether is not well accepted in science. What I am looking for is past and/or current theories where the aether and gravity are associated with each other. If you have an idea, let me know. If you have published research or read research, I would like to know. If you can provide a citation for this theory, that would also be welcomed. I would hope this post would not be a place to debate such theories, simply a place to post the theory. Let's hear what you have to say.

Researchgate claims that a paper references one that I co-authored. I was intrigued and downloaded the paper. I cannot find a citation of my work in that paper, using several different searches, as well as a visual scan of the references. Does anyone know how researchgate is generating these messages? And how do I report it if this is a mistake? I do not find any "contact us" or "help" link so I feel forced to enter this as a discussion with peers on this forum rather than a discussion with the keepers of the forum. Thanks.

Hey all!

I am looking for help to increase the citation count for my memristor test research.

Memristor test is a relatively new area with limited commercial availability for these nanoscale devices unlike transistors. Very few research ideas have been published in the test area since this technology is under development.

Please dm or comment all possible ideas for increasing citations. I am interested to learn about any resources that I could use to broadcast my research. Also I am not a full time researcher, I try to publish 1-2 papers every year.

Any memristor researchers interested to learn about test- please dm me! I would be very happy to connect and share my publications with you.

This question revolves around the indicators used to evaluate universities, scientists, and publications. Have these indicators truly served science? To what extent can they be relied upon? Or have they turned the focus into a race for more citations rather than emphasizing the quality and accuracy of scientific output?

I'm seeking research partners to collaborate on projects in Security, Privacy, Mobile Networks, Fake News Detection, and AI/ML for the lab I'm establishing.

Talented researchers interested in these areas can reach out to me at [email protected].

I have several topics available and would like to coordinate with PhD candidates (including postdocs and those in progress), undergraduate and graduate students, as well as industry experts.

Feel free to explore my Google Scholar profile here: https://scholar.google.se/citations?hl=en&user=xBZlxw4AAAAJ

Rather than purchasing individual articles, a more efficient approach could be to implement a payment system based on citations. Under this model, researchers would have access to the entirety of global academic papers; however, a fee would be incurred for each paper cited in their work. This payment mechanism could be effectively facilitated through the use of smart contracts.

A portion of the citation fee would be allocated to the author of the cited paper, while the remaining portion would be distributed to the individual or journal responsible for reviewing the cited work. Such a system could be implemented utilizing blockchain technology, with platforms like Hedera offering the necessary infrastructure. Additionally, collaboration with platforms like ResearchGate could provide the means to accurately identify and track citations.

It is important to note that this citation-based payment system does not necessarily require the involvement of traditional journals. However, journals can still benefit from this system by receiving a portion of the citation fees for the papers they publish and review. The primary beneficiaries of this system are researchers who need to access and cite papers, authors of original papers who receive compensation for their work, and the individuals who conduct thorough reviews of these papers. This approach not only incentivizes the creation and dissemination of high-quality research but also ensures that the contributions of authors and reviewers are appropriately recognized and rewarded.

I want to see number of citations each of my article has.

How can I correct wrong entries in ResearchGate, e.g. misspelled author names or citation of the wrong journal?

Research Interest Score

2,143

Citations

3,191

h-index

• Authors:

• Yingwu Wang

• Dilip Patel

• Graham King

• Ian Court

• Geoff Staples

• Margaret Ross

• Mohamad Fayad

Author's Info & Claims

ACM Computing Surveys, Volume 32Issue 1espp 7–eshttps://doi.org/10.1145/351936.351943

Published:01 March 2000 Publication History

On Built-in Test Reuse in Object-Oriented Framework Design

• March 2000

• ACM Computing Surveys 32(1 es):7-12

• DOI:

• 10.1145/351936.351943

• Source

• doi.acm.org

•

Research Interest Score

19.0

Citations

51

Recommendations

0

Reads

61

[3]

54 Citations

Highly Influential Citations

2

Background Citations

16

Methods Citations

10

Where

Citations

Number of Reads and download

Recommendations

ACM

67

1,681

2

RGs

51

61

0

Semantic Scholar

54

Not provided

2

Google Scholar

Not exist and I will be added today.

Finding #1: ResearchGate is the lowest in the citation (51), and ACM 67, and 16 citations are missing.

Finding #2: ResearchGate has 61 reads and ACM have 1,681 downloads, poorly affecting the research interest score.

Finding #3: ResearchGate has zero recommendations, while ACM has 2 Highly Influential Citations (Recommendations)

Finding #4: I am the third author and guest edited the entire theme issue on the ACM Computing Survey, one of twelve theme issues that I guest edited.

Finding #5: This article does not exist on Google Scholar; hundreds of my articles also need to be posted.

Finding #6: Frankly speaking, ResearchGate is harming my Scientific Reputation, and I don't know why? My citations are more than 10k.

Finding #7: ResearchGate citations do not increase at the same rate as Google Scholar

1996 – 148

1997 – 212

…

2000 – 241

2001 – 315

2002 – 447

2003 – 527

You will notice drops in specific years because of Legal battles, Health, and Family Problem, from 2006 to and present. But I am still working very hard because I love what I do.

…

2019 – 114

2020 – 99

2021 – 75

2022 – 59

2023 – 45 and it will increase a lot by GOD'S WELL

I emailed ResearchGate several times, and they have yet to reply.

Because it seems that the ResearchGate score relies more on the number of citations and less on the quality of the work or the significance of the journal in which the article was published.

I've just found a preprint that cites one of my publications. It's not captured on my citations. Is this typical for pre-prints and is there any way to capture these?

Hi. I had written a manuscript on Bibliometric Analysis related to oral cancer last year. Since then I had sent it to multiple journals only to get rejected. I request you all to please give me some insights on how to improve the manuscript. As one of the reviewer's comment mentioned that the study adds nothing new to the existing knowledge. The data was analyzed for year of publication, leading countries and their collaboration, source, number of citations, list of highly cited articles and keywords plus with Biblioshiny application.

I have some of my articles that have been cited by other published authors but this has not been added to my citations on Google Scholar and ResearchGate.

Citations in research gate need to re-evaluate .

I am writing a word document, using my Mac. When trying to insert a citation from Mendeley I get a Microsoft message saying "Citation/Bibliography is wrongly placed in index area, please delete the placed citation/bibliography in index area."

What should I do?

Many thanks

My word repeats the same number every time[1] in all places when I insert citations from Mendeley?, though I insert a different journal it still shows me again [1], track changes does not work I tried pls help

In 2015, Clarivate launched the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), which extended the universe of publications in Web of Science™ Core Collection  to include high-quality, peer-reviewed publications of regional importance and in emerging scientific fields. ESCI deepens subject area coverage across the Web of Science™ Core Collection and increases interdisciplinary connections by adding more than 8000 journals, all of which now receive the Journal Impact Factor™.

Is it??

I need some latest citations on the effects of SLAC on the professional development of teachers

I added a version of my article (as a preprint, though after review and confirmation of acceptance), which cites my previous article. But now, a published version is added separately, and a double citation is indicated by the article and preprint with the same doi! How to either fix this duplication or merge the article and the preprint? Don't want to delete the preprint, because somebody saved it.

Citation report

Citations not appear in research gate.

Many research articles, earning positive feedback by researcher(s), have been observed to be hardly cited.

This is a point which is to be thought of deeply.

I think, in order to cite an article by an author it is required that

(1) the author must read this article and understand it,

& (2) the article must be related to and suitable for the article where to be cited.

As I do understand, the quality of an article is a necessary but not sufficient condition for being cited by researchers/authors.

Thus the following question arises:

"Does the citation of a research article depend upon its quality only ?"

Dear colleague,

Good day.

ResearchGate does a pretty good job of tracking publication analytics such as reads and citations over time. The recommendations feature can also be an interesting indicator for a publication's resonance with the scholarly community.

This progress allow for ideas to be developed about how to make the analytics features even better in the future. Here are some ideas I have been thinking about:

Are there any additional analytics features that you would like to see on ResearchGate?

I am looking for exact copy number of pET28a plasmid. A citation would be great. Literature search only shows that it is low copy vector, but I haven't found any papers that mention the exact copy number or even an estimate.

Mali, Shrikant balasaheb. “Anaphylaxis during the perioperative period.” Anesthesia, Essays and Researches 6 (2012): 124 - 133.

This article has 169 sites on semantic scholar

and same article has 56 citations in google scholar.

generally the citations are more in google scholar than anywhere else.

can anyone tell me what is going on.

and if this is correct can I do anything to increase my citations in google scholar for same article.

Over the past few months, a number of offers of various consulting services, training courses and webinars have appeared on online social media, which initially offer the first trial lessons, webinars, training courses as part of a promotion for free and subsequent ones for a fee. Initially, ebooks are offered free of charge as part of the promotion, which are usually developed with the help of ChatGPT, are of poor content quality, usually containing only general, well-known, popular science knowledge, which can be found independently on the Internet on various websites. Besides, the ebooks created with the help of ChatGPT or other similar intelligent chatbots do not contain all the sources correctly listed. Besides, the resulting ebooks contain many passages, whole sentences, paragraphs taken from other publications that are not shown in the bibliography, and plagiarism thus occurs. In addition, in the field of expertise, there are factual errors and irrational, random, random, combined content from different sources, and thus inconsistent with the facts, ridiculous content and/or descriptions of "fictitious facts" occur. This is because much of the database that constitutes the sources of data and information for ChatGPT is factually outdated, as it dates from late 2021 or January 2022. It may happen that in the ChatGPT-generated text there may be some sensitive data of specific companies or public institutions, which found themselves there accidentally by being mistakenly entered into ChatGPT by an employee of a specific company or institution. In view of the above, there are still gaps in paragraphs in the legal norms defining the rules for the correct use of tools such as ChatGPT, and still the adaptation of legal norms to the rapidly developing technology is often done with too much delay. Besides, popular online social media even feature partly free and partly paid training courses and webinars, where Internet users learn how to create texts for articles, columns, essays, etc., as well as chapters for books, which can be published as ebooks, in a relatively easy way with the help of applications available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology. Besides, in addition to text, graphics, photos, drawings, etc., which are included in the texts of chapters in ebooks can also be generated semi-automatically in applications based on generative artificial intelligence technology. It also happens that during the aforementioned online trainings and webinars, access is sold to specially created websites that act as intermediary platforms, overlays that contain links to various AI-based web applications, which have been classified in a certain way on a specially created platform and, to make identification more difficult, the links are called by different names relative to the web applications to which they direct. In addition, many of these web-based applications based on generative AI technology are made available on the Internet on the original source sites free of charge. On the other hand, on intermediary platforms created by companies or sole proprietors that contain links referencing these applications, access is paid for and is often sold as part of so-called promotional offers during the conducted, aforementioned online training courses and webinars. Internet users usually learn about such online trainings and webinars from banners and advertising posts posted on popular online social media sites.

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I personally checked each of the citations of my works on the Academy website and I validated those where my works are cited. The papers on the Academy website in which I am correctly cited are not on ResearchGate. How can I promote them on ResearchGate so that all my papers cited become validated?

create a citation of this website

I would expect that "An Article in a Web Magazine" is probably the most appropriate MLA citation format.

Based on MLA Formatting and Style Guide, and considering Quora as a web magazine, I would say, in APA:

Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day of answer). Title of answer [Answer to question]. In Quora. URL of the question.

Note that the format for citing an answer on Quora is similar to citing a blog post or online forum post. If you cannot find all the information required for the citation, include as much information as possible and follow the APA guidelines for citing electronic sources.

What's your opinion?

Hi this paper has two citations according to pub med that aren’t showing up on researchgate:

Presnall L, Suchting R, Hicks G, Hamilton J. Predictors of self-reported general health status in people experiencing homelessness with serious mental illness. Qual Life Res. 2023 Jul;32(7):2003-2011. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03370-9. Epub 2023 Feb 20. PMID: 36808283; PMCID: PMC9939866.

I am a producer of multiple educational films but there doesn't appear to be a way to add them on Researchgate or to have citations noted in stats.

What is the best reference and citation manager? EndNote Web Mendeley Zotero Other

Dear reader,

I have 5 citations. ‘A Girl with selfharm treated with NAC’: 3 and ‘Treatment of 95 post-Covid patients with SSRIs’: 2.

But according to you, I only have 4.

How is it possible that the amount of citations isn’t correct?

Kind regards,

Carla Rus

Read the article at http://surl.li/qiggy, which was recently published by Science this January 2024.

Anyone please let me know how to contact research gate and google scholar to update the number of citations.

How to increase citations in our published articles?

We have many citations, how can we add them to google scolar?

Why do the researchGate h-index and i10-idex differ greatly from the Google Scholar rating?

The values are supposed to be the same since the ratings are based on citations and the impact of the research output.

Did anyone noticed this also?

i am not able to update my citations and h index

I have many citations on my artticles. Why did not you account them? for example, my own article "Human rights education in Egypt: Secondary school students’ perceptions" is cited in the article: Students’ Awareness of Human Rights Education at Higher Secondary School level

DOI: 10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-46.

Here is my google scholar profile:

My regards

Articles

From Mead C. Killion, PhD ScD Hon

220? published papers with colleagues

I think I remember 3500 citations?

NA

What is the usual method for obtaining export citations from Google Scholar? I tried to use Harzing's Publish or Perish, but the interface limits results to only the first 200 searches.

Maybe I can try on R instead?

Dear Admin

I just looked at my article entitled :

The wrong co-author is listed, it should be Danendro Adi (https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=4SuNRUUAAAAJ&hl=en)

Not Deden Adi Mardian Lesmana (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Deden-Adi-Lesmana)

To immediately remove the name https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Deden-Adi-Lesmana as the co-author of the article above

regards

INDA ARIESTA, S.Sn., M.Sn.

Hello there.

I wanted to ask how I can increase the reach of my scientific work without being associated with any research center? What I mean here is the number of citations, the number reads etc...

Do you use other sites similar to RG?

Do you encourage citation in any way?

I would love to hear your opinions on how to expand your network and promote your own research work.

I would also like to wish you all the best in the new year!

Best regards

The site shows that my works are cited in some papers, however when I checked those papers, I found no sign of being referenced (on the other hand my work is referenced in completely different text, which is not recognised at all, maybe because those text weren't uploaded to the site). How to ensure the citations are attribute correctly?

The impact of retracted papers on the scientific community can be significant and far-reaching. When a scientific paper is retracted, it means that the findings and conclusions presented in the paper are no longer considered valid or reliable. This can have serious consequences for future research, as other researchers may have built their work upon the now-discredited findings. Furthermore, retracted papers can erode public trust in the scientific community and raise questions about the peer-review process and the rigor of scientific research.