Deep Learning - Science topic

Hey everyone,

I'm writing my master thesis on the impact of artificial intelligence on business productivity.

This study is mainly aimed at those of you who develop AI or use these technologies in your professional environment.

This questionnaire will take no more than 5 minutes to complete, and your participation is confidential!

Thank you in advance for your time and contribution!

To take part, please click on the link below: https://forms.gle/fzzHq4iNqGUiidTWA

1)

2)

Conducting a SWOT analysis of the applications of artificial intelligence technology in business, in the business activities of companies and enterprises, shows that there are both many already and developing many more business applications of the said technology, i.e., many potential development opportunities are recognized in this field of using the achievements of the current fourth and/or fifth technological revolution in various spheres of business activity, as well as there are many risks arising from inappropriate, incompatible with the prevailing social norms, standards of reliable business activity, incompatible with business ethics use of new technologies. Among some of the most recognized negative aspects of improper use of generative artificial intelligence technology is the use of AI-equipped graphic applications available on the Internet that allow for the simple and easy generation of photos, graphics, images, videos and animations that, in the form of very realistically presented images, photos, videos, etc., depict something that never happened in reality, i.e., they graphically present images or videos presenting what could be described as “fictitious facts” in a very professional manner. In this way, Internet users can become disinformation generators in online social media, where they can post the said generated images, photos, videos, etc. with added descriptions, posts, comments, in which the said “fictitious facts” presented in the photos or videos will also be described in an editorially correct manner. Besides, the mentioned descriptions, posts, entries, comments, etc. can also be edited with the help of intelligent chatbots available on the Internet like Chat GPT, Copilot, Gemini, etc. However, misinformation is not the only serious problem as it has significantly intensified after OpenAI released the first versions of ChatGPT chatbot online in November 2021. A new category of technical operational risk associated with the new AI technology applied has emerged in companies and enterprises that implement generative artificial intelligence technology into various spheres of business. In addition, there is a growing scale of risks arising from conflicts of interest between business entities related to not fully regulated copyright issues of works created using applications and information systems equipped with generative artificial intelligence technology. Accordingly, there is a demand for the development of a standard of a kind of digital signature with the help of which works created with the help of AI technology will be electronically signed, so that each such work will be unique, unrepeatable and whose counterfeiting will thus be seriously hampered. However, these are only some of the negative aspects of the developing applications of AI technologies, for which there are no functioning legal norms. In the middle of 2023 and then in the spring of 2024, European Union bodies made public the preliminary versions of the developed legal norms on the proper, business-ethical use of technology in business, which were given the name AI Act. The legal normatives, referred to as the AIAct, contain a number of specific, defined types of AI technology applications deemed inappropriate, unethical, i.e. those that should not be used. The AIAct contains classified according to different levels of negative impact on society various types and specific examples of inappropriate and unethical use of AI technologies in the context of various aspects of business as well as non-business activities. An important issue to consider is the scale of the commitment of technology companies developing AI technologies to respect such regulations so that issues of ethical use of this technology are also defined as much as possible in technological aspects in companies that create, develop and implement these technologies. Besides, in order for AIACT's legal norms, when they come into force, not to be dead, it is necessary to introduce both sanction instruments in the form of specific penalties for business entities that use artificial intelligence technologies unethically, antisocially, contrary to AIAct. On the other hand, it would also be a good solution to introduce a system of rewarding those companies and businesses that make the most proper, pro-social, in accordance with the provisions of the AIAct, fully ethical use of AI technologies. In view of the fact that AIACT is to come into force only in more than 2 years so it is necessary to constantly monitor the development of AI technology, verify the validity of the provisions of AIAct in the face of dynamically developing AI technology, successively amend the provisions of the said legal norms, so that when they come into force they do not turn out to be outdated. In view of the above, it is to be hoped that, despite the rapid technological progress, the provisions on the ethical applications of artificial intelligence technology will be constantly updated and the legal normatives shaping the development of AI technology will be amended accordingly. If AIAct achieves the above-mentioned goals to a significant extent, ethical applications of AI technology should be implemented in the future, and the technology can be referred to as ethical generative artificial intelligence, which is finding new applications.

The key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology are described in my article below:

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I am trying to apply a machine-learning classifier to a dataset. But the dataset is in the .pcap file extension. How can I apply classifiers to this dataset?

Is there any process to convert the dataset into .csv format?

Thanks,

Which patching method is suitable and practical for training and testing deep learning networks when it comes to patching input data? Is it small patches with overlap, such as 50x50 on individual pixels, or large non-overlapping patches like 256x256?

There are many indications that artificial intelligence technology can be of great help in terms of discovering and creating new drugs. Artificial intelligence can help reduce the cost of developing new drugs, can significantly reduce the time it takes to design and create new drug formulations, the time it takes to conduct research and testing, and can thus provide patients with new therapies for treating various diseases and saving lives faster. Thanks to the use of new technologies and analytical methods, the way healthcare professionals treat patients has been changing rapidly in recent times. As scientists manage to overcome the complex problems associated with lengthy research processes, and the pharmaceutical industry seeks to reduce the time it takes to develop life-saving drugs, so-called precision medicine is coming to the rescue. It takes a lot of time to develop, analyze, test and bring a new drug to market. Artificial intelligence technology is particularly helpful in this regard, including reducing the aforementioned time to create a new drug. When creating most drugs, the first step is to synthesize a compound that can bind to a target molecule associated with the disease. The molecule in question is usually a protein, which is then tested for various influencing factors. In order to find the right compound, researchers analyze thousands of potential candidates of different molecules. When a compound that meets certain characteristics is successfully identified, then researchers search through huge libraries of similar compounds to find the optimal interaction with the protein responsible for the specific disease. In contrast, many years of time and many millions of dollars of funding are required to complete this labor-intensive process today. In a situation where artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning are involved in this process, then the entire process can be significantly reduced in time, costs can be significantly reduced and the new drug can be brought to the pharmaceutical market faster by pharmaceutical companies. However, can an artificial intelligence equipped with artificial neural networks that has been taught through deep learning to carry out the above-mentioned processes get it wrong when creating a new drug? What if the drug that was supposed to cure a person of a particular disease produces a number of new side effects that prove even more problematic for the patient than the original disease from which it was supposed to be cured? What if the patient dies due to previously unforeseen side effects? Will insurance companies recognize the artificial intelligence's mistake and compensate the family of the deceased patient? Who will bear the legal, financial, ethical, etc. responsibility for such a situation?

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

memorize-ability > generalize-ability

I want to write theoritical analysis of DL model how it is better than other models. Please any one idea how to write theoritical analysis of DL model or provide any article for referecne or tutorial to write such discussion in paper.

When I am training deep learning model with different architectures, some time I have to change the batch size to prevent from Resource Exhausted Error condition. Is comparing the performance of these models trained in different batch size an issue or not?

I see lot research paper where batch size is defined fixed.

Dear RG group,

We are going to examine different AI models on large datasets of ultrasound focal lesions with definitive (patological examination after surgery in malignant leasions and biopsy and follow up in benign ones) final diagnosis. I am looking for images obtained with different us scanners with application of different image optimisation techniques as eg harmonic imaging, compound ultrasound etc. with or without segmentation.

Thank you in advance for your suggestions,

RZS

The project I'm currently working on aims to create a deep learning model for Human Activity Recognition. I'm focusing on system design and implementation. Could someone please help me by sharing some papers or document links to better understand system design and implementation?

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Hello Guys!

I need a person who is working in the area, please let's connect.

..

Area: Manufacturing, additive manufacturing, CNN, mechanical engineering

When a model is trained using a specific dataset with limited diversity in labels, it may accurately predict labels for objects within that dataset. However, when applied to real-time recognition tasks using a webcam, the model might incorrectly predict labels for objects not present in the training data. This poses a challenge as the model's predictions may not align with the variety of objects encountered in real-world scenarios.

Are there any solutions or opinions that experts can share to guide me further in improving the model?

Thank you for considering your opinion on my problems.

Chalmers in his book: What is this thing called Science? mentions that Science is Knowledge obtained from information. The most important endeavors of science are : Prediction and Explanation of Phenomenon. The emergence of Big (massive) Data leads us to the field of Data Science (DS) with the main focus on prediction. Indeed, data belong to a specific field of knowledge or science (physics, economy, ....).

If DS is able to realize prediction for the field of sociology (for example), to whom the merit is given: Data Scientist or Sociologist?

10.1007/s11229-022-03933-2

#DataScience #ArtificialIntelligence #Naturallanguageprocessing #DeepLearning #Machinelearning #Science #Datamining

As part of today's rapid technological advances, new technologies are being developed for Industry 4.0, including but not limited to artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotization, Internet of Things, cloud computing, Big Data Analytics, etc. The aforementioned technologies are being applied in various industries and sectors. The development of artificial intelligence generates opportunities for its application in various spheres of companies, enterprises and institutions; in various industries and services; improving the efficiency of business operations by increasing the scale of process automation; increasing the scale of business efficiency, increasing the ability to process large sets of data and information; increasing the scale of implementation of new business models based on large-scale automation of manufacturing processes, etc.

However, developing artificial intelligence uncontrollably generates serious risks, such as increasing the scale of disinformation, emerging fake news, including banners, memes containing artificial intelligence crafted photos, graphics, animations, videos presenting "fictitious facts", i.e. in a way that apparently looks very realistic describing, depicting events that never happened. In this way, intelligent but not fully perfect chatbots create so-called hallucinations. Besides, by analogy, just like many other technologies, applications available on the Internet equipped with generative artificial intelligence technology can be used not only in positive but also in negative applications.

On the one hand, there are new opportunities to use generative AI as a new tool to improve the work of computer graphic designers and filmmakers. On the other hand, there are also controversies about the ethical aspects and the necessary copyright regulations for works created using artificial intelligence. Sometimes copyright settlements are not clear-cut. This is the case when it cannot be precisely determined whether plagiarism has occurred, and if so, to what extent. Ambiguity on this issue can also generate various court decisions regarding, for example, the recognition or non-recognition of copyrights granted to individuals using Internet applications or information systems equipped with certain generative artificial intelligence solutions, who act as creators who create a kind of cultural works and/or works of art in the form of graphics, photos, animations, films, stories, poems, etc. that have the characteristics of uniqueness and uniqueness.

However, this is probably not the case since, for example, the company OpenAI may be in serious trouble because of allegations by the editors of the New York Times Journal suggesting that ChatGPT was trained on data and information from, among other things, online news portals run by the editors of the aforementioned journal. Well, in December 2023, the New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft accusing them of illegally using the newspaper's articles to train its chatbots, ChatGPT and Bing. According to the newspaper, the companies used millions of texts in violation of copyright laws, creating a service based on them that competes with the newspaper. The New York Times is demanding billions of dollars in damages.In view of the above, there are all sorts of risks of potentially increasing the scale of influence on public opinion, the formation of the general public consciousness by organizations operating without respect for the law. On the one hand, it is necessary to create digital computerized and standardized tools, diagnostic information systems, to build a standardized system of labels informing users, customers, citizens using certain solutions, products and services that they are the products of artificial intelligence, not man. On the other hand, on the other hand, there should be regulations obliging to inform that a certain service or product was created as a result of work done not by humans, but by artificial intelligence. Many issues concerning the socially, ethically and business-appropriate use of artificial intelligence technology will be normatively regulated in the next few years.

Regulations defining the proper use of artificial intelligence technologies by companies developing applications based on these technologies, making these applications available on the Internet, as well as Internet users, business entities and institutions using intelligent chatbots to improve the operation of certain spheres of economic, business activities, etc., are being processed, enacted, but will come into force only in a few years.

On June 14, 2023, the European Parliament passed a landmark piece of legislation regulating the use of artificial intelligence technology. However, since artificial intelligence technology, mainly generative artificial intelligence, is developing rapidly and the currently formulated regulations are scheduled to be implemented between 2026 and 2027, so on the one hand, operators using this technology have plenty of time to bring their procedures and products in line with the supported regulations. On the other hand, one cannot exclude the scenario that, despite the attempt to fully regulate the development of applications of this technology through the implementation of a law on the proper, safe and ethical use of artificial intelligence, it will again turn out in 2027 that the dynamic technological progress is ahead of the legislative process that rapidly developing technologies are concerned with.

I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

How do you become a Machine Learning(ML) and Artificial Intelligence(AI) Engineer? or start research in AI/ML, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning?

Should I pursue a "Master of Science thesis in Computer Science." with a major in AI to become an AI Engineer?

I have a dataset from lung cancer images with 163 samples (2D images). I use the fine-tuning of deep learning algorithms to classify samples, but the validation loss did not decrease. I augmented the data and used dropout, but the validation loss didn't drop. How can I solve this problem?

In order to reduce the growing scale of disinformation, including disinformation generated in social media through in the increasing scale of emerging fakenews, deepfakes, disinformation generated through the use of applications available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology, the just mentioned GAI technology can be used. Constantly improved, taught to carry out new types of activities, tasks and commands, intelligent chatbots and other applications based on generative artificial intelligence technology can be applied to identify instances of disinformation spread primarily in online social media. The aforementioned disinformation is particularly dangerous for children and adolescents, it can significantly affect the world view of the general public's awareness of certain issues, it can affect the formation of development trends of certain social processes, it can affect the results of parliamentary and presidential elections, it can also affect the level of sales of certain types of products and services, and so on. In the absence of a developed institutional system of media control institutions, including the new online media; lack of a developed system of control of the level of objectivity of content directed to citizens in advertising campaigns; lack of consideration of the issue of disinformation analysis by competition and consumer protection institutions; lack of or poorly functioning democracy protection institutions; lack of institutions that reliably take care of a high level of journalistic ethics and media independence, the scale of disinformation of citizens by various groups of influence, including public institutions and commercially operating business entities may be high and may generate high social costs. Accordingly, new technologies of Industry 4.0/5.0, including generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies, should be involved in order to reduce the scale of growing disinformation, including the generation of factoids, deepfakes, etc. in social media. The aforementioned GAI technologies can help identify fakenews pseudo-journalistic content, identify photos containing deepfakes, identify factually incorrect content contained in banners, spots and advertising videos published in various media as part of ongoing advertising and promotional campaigns aimed at activating sales of various products and services.

I described the applications of Big Data technologies in sentiment analysis, business analytics and risk management in an article of my co-authorship:

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Perhaps in the future - as a result of the rapid technological advances currently taking place and the rivalry of leading technology companies developing AI technologies - a general artificial intelligence (AGI) will emerge. At present, there are unresolved deliberations on the question of new opportunities and threats that may occur as a result of the construction and development of general artificial intelligence in the future. The rapid technological progress currently taking place in the field of generative artificial intelligence in connection with the already high level of competition among technology companies developing these technologies may lead to the emergence of a super artificial intelligence, a strong general artificial intelligence that can achieve the capabilities of self-development, self-improvement and perhaps also autonomy, independence from humans. This kind of scenario may lead to a situation where this kind of strong, super AI or general artificial intelligence is out of human control. Perhaps this kind of strong, super, general artificial intelligence will be able, as a result of self-improvement, to reach a state that can be called artificial consciousness. On the one hand, new possibilities can be associated with the emergence of this kind of strong, super, general artificial intelligence, including perhaps new possibilities for solving the key problems of the development of human civilization. However, on the other hand, one should not forget about the potential dangers if this kind of strong, super, general artificial intelligence in its autonomous development and self-improvement independent of man were to get completely out of the control of man. Probably, whether this will involve mainly new opportunities or rather new dangers for mankind will mainly be determined by how man will direct this development of AI technology while he still has control over this development.

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Hi,

I am developing Deep learning model(s) for a binary classification problem. The DL works with a reasonable accuracy. Is there a reliable way to extract features from DL models built with 'Keras' pipeline? It seems that the feature contribution are distributed among several layers.

Thank You,

Partho

In other words, why have improvements to neural networks led to an increase in hyperparameters? Are hyperparameters related to some fundamental flaw of neural networks?

In the actual scenario of federated learning, the problem of heterogeneity is an inevitable challenge, so what can we do to alleviate the challenges caused by these heterogeneities?

Neuronal networks and deep learning algorithms are not appropiate for high safety levels applications (e.g. ADAS/AD). The possible test coverage is to low.

Are there any other approches?

I am inclined to research on EEG classification using ML/DL. The research area seems saturated. Hence, I am confused as to where I can contribute.

I have built a hybrid model for a recognition task that involves both images and videos. However, I am encountering an issue with precision, recall, and F1-score, all showing 100%, while the accuracy is reported as 99.35% ~ 99.9%. I have tested the model on various videos and images (related to the experiment data including seperate data), and it seems to be performing well. Nevertheless, I am confused about whether this level of accuracy is acceptable. In my understanding, if precision, recall, and F1-score are all 100%, the accuracy should also be 100%.

I am curious if anyone has encountered similar situations in their deep learning practices and if there are logical explanations or solutions. Your insights, explanations, or experiences on this matter would be valuable for me to better understand and address this issue.

Noted: An ablation study was conducted based on different combinations. In the model where I am confused, without these additional combinations, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are very low. Also, the loss and validation accuracy are very high on other's combinations.

Thank you.

How does predictive AI operate on deep learning?

What role does the complexity of the dataset play in the susceptibility of deep learning models to adversarial perturbations?

I am currently involved in research focused on defects detection within the Additive Manufacturing field, and I am seeking an international conference outside India but in Asian countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, and the UAE. Please help me finding it.

The recent rapid development of generative artificial intelligence applications is increasingly changing labor markets. The development of generative artificial intelligence applications is increasing the scale of objectification of work performed within various professions. On the one hand, generative artificial intelligence technologies are finding more and more applications in companies, enterprises and institutions increasing the efficiency of certain business processes supporting employees working in various positions. However, there are increasing considerations about the possibility of black scenarios coming true in futurological projections suggesting that in the future many jobs will be completely replaced by autonomic AI-equipped robots, androids or systems operating in cloud computing. On the other hand, in opposition to the black scenarios of future developments in labor markets are contrasted with more positive scenarios presenting futuristic projections of the development of labor markets, where new professions will be created thanks to the implementation of generative artificial intelligence technology into various aspects of economic activity. Which of these two scenarios will be realized to a greater extent in the future is currently not easy to predict precisely.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Assuming that if man succeeds in building a general, general artificial intelligence, i.e. AI technology capable of self-improvement, independent development and perhaps also obtaining a state of artificial consciousness then perhaps this will mean that man has fully learned the essence of his own intelligence and consciousness. If this happens, what will be the result? Will man first learn the essence of his own intelligence and consciousness and then build a general, general artificial intelligence, i.e. AI technology capable of self-improvement, independent development and perhaps also obtaining a state of artificial consciousness, or vice versa, i.e. first a general artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness capable of self-improvement and development will be created and then thanks to the aforementioned technological progress made from the field of artificial intelligence, man will fully learn the essence of his own intelligence and consciousness. In my opinion, it is most likely that both processes will develop and implement simultaneously on a reciprocal feedback basis.

I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Hi all,

I am working with NetSim which is an end-to-end, full-stack, packet-level network simulator and emulator to simulate 5G networks, and want to integrate Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) for my research.

My understanding of NetSim is reasonably good, and I am now looking to apply RL within this framework so as to learn optimal policies.

I have previously worked on a basic DQN model for Power Control and Rate Adaptation in Cellular Networks. I also tried to use RL to find the optimal serving capacity for a data batch arrival problem.

I have two questions:

I'm doing some research to explore the application of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in the context of brain tumor detection. Specifically, I aim to develop a model that not only accurately detects the presence of brain tumors but also provides clear explanations for its decisions regarding positive or negative results. My main concerns are making sure that the model's decision-making process is transparent and comprehending the underlying reasoning behind its choices. I would be grateful for any thoughts, suggestions, or links to papers or web articles that address the practical application of XAI in this field (including the dataset types or anything that is related with XAi).

Thank you.

Generative artificial intelligence technology is currently being used to carry out various complex activities, to solve tasks intelligently, to implement multi-criteria processes, to create multi-faceted simulations and generate complex dynamic models, to creatively perform manufacturing processes that require processing large sets of data and information, etc., which until recently only humans could do. Recently, there have been attempts to create computerized, intelligent analytical platforms, through which it would be possible to forecast complex, multi-faceted, multi-criteria, dynamically changing macroprocesses, including, first of all, long-term objectively realized economic, social, political, climatic, natural and other macroprocesses. Based on the experience to date from research work on the analysis of the development of generative artificial intelligence technology and other technologies typical of the current Fourth Technological Revolution, technologies categorized as Industry 4.0/5.0, the rapidly developing various forms and fields of application of AI technologies, it is clear that the dynamic technological progress that is currently taking place will probably increase the possibilities of building complex intelligent predictive models for multi-faceted, complex macroprocesses in the years to come. The current capabilities of generative artificial intelligence technology in the field of improving forecasting models and carrying out forecasts of the formation of specific trends within complex macroprocesses are still limited and imperfect. The imperfection of forecasting models may be due to the human factor, i.e., their design by humans, the determination by humans of the key criteria and determinants that determine the functioning of certain forecasting models. In a situation where in the future forecasting models will be designed and improved, corrected, adapted to changing, for example, environmental conditions at each stage by artificial intelligence technology then they will probably be able to be much more perfect than the currently functioning and built forecasting models. Another shortcoming is the issue of data obsolescence and data limitation. There is currently no way to connect an AI-equipped analytical platform to the entire resources of the Internet, taking into account the processing of all the data and information contained in the Internet in real time. Even today's fastest quantum computers and the most advanced Big Data Analytics systems do not have such capabilities. However, it is not out of the question that in the future the dynamic development of generative artificial intelligence technology, the ongoing competition among leading technology companies developing technologies for intelligent chatbots, robots equipped with artificial intelligence, creating intelligent control systems for machines and processes, etc., will lead to the creation of general artificial intelligence, i.e. advanced, general artificial intelligence that will be capable of self-improvement. However, it is important that the said advanced general advanced artificial intelligence does not become fully autonomous, does not become completely independent, does not become out of the control of man, because there would be a risk of this highly advanced technology turning against man which would involve the creation of high levels of risks and threats to man, including the risk of losing the possibility of human existence on planet Earth.

I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Among the areas in which applications based on generative artificial intelligence are now rapidly finding application are marketing communication processes realized within the framework of Internet marketing, within the framework of social media advertising campaigns. More and more advertising agencies are using generative artificial intelligence technology to create images, graphics, animations and videos that are used in advertising campaigns. Thanks to the use of generative artificial intelligence technology, the creation of such key elements of marketing communication materials has become much simpler and cheaper and their creation time has been significantly reduced. On the other hand, thanks to the applications already available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology that enable the creation of photos, graphics, animations and videos, it is no longer only advertising agencies employing professional cartoonists, graphic designers, screenwriters and filmmakers that can create professional marketing materials and advertising campaigns. Thanks to the aforementioned applications available on the Internet, graphic design platforms, including free smartphone apps offered by technology companies, advertising spots and entire advertising campaigns can be designed, created and executed by Internet users, including online social media users, who have not previously been involved in the creation of graphics, banners, posters, animations and advertising videos. Thus, opportunities are already emerging for Internet users who maintain their social media profiles to professionally create promotional materials and advertising campaigns. On the other hand, generative artificial intelligence technology can be used unethically within the framework of generating disinformation, informational factoids and deepfakes. The significance of this problem, including the growing disinformation on the Internet, has grown rapidly in recent years. The deepfake image processing technique involves combining images of human faces using artificial intelligence techniques.

In order to reduce the scale of disinformation spreading on the Internet media, it is necessary to create a universal system for labeling photos, graphics, animations and videos created using generative artificial intelligence technology. On the other hand, a key factor facilitating the development of this kind of problem of generating disinformation is that many legal issues related to the technology have not yet been regulated. Therefore, it is also necessary to refine legal norms on copyright issues, intellectual property protection that take into account the creation of works that have been created using generative artificial intelligence technology. Besides, social media companies should constantly improve tools for detecting and removing graphic and/or video materials created using deepfake technology.

I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

..

The combination of various analytical techniques, ICT information technologies, Industry 4.0/5.0, including Big Data Analytics, cloud computing, multi-criteria simulation models, digital twins, Business Intelligence and machine learning, deep learning up to generative artificial intelligence, and quantum computers characterized by high computing power, opens up new, broader possibilities for carrying out complex analytical processes based on processing large sets of data and information. Adding generative artificial intelligence to the aforementioned technological mix also opens up new possibilities for carrying out predictive analyses based on complex, multi-factor models made up of various interrelated indicators, which can dynamically adapt to the changing environment of various factors and conditions. The aforementioned complex models can relate to economic processes, including macroeconomic processes, specific markets, the functioning of business entities in specific markets and in the dynamically changing sectoral and macroeconomic environment of the domestic and international global economy. Identified and described trends of specific economic and financial processes developed on the basis of historical data of the previous months, quarters and years are the basis for the development of forecasts of extrapolation of these trends for the following months, quarters and years, taking into account a number of alternative situation scenarios, which can dynamically change over time depending on changing conditions and market and sectoral determinants of the environment of specific analyzed companies and enterprises. In addition to this, the forecasting models developed in this way can apply to various types of sectoral and macroeconomic analyses, economic and financial analyses of business entities, fundamental and technical analyses carried out for securities priced in the market on stock exchanges. Market valuations of securities are juxtaposed with the results of the fundamental analyses carried out in order to diagnose the scale of undervaluation or overvaluation of the market valuation of specific stocks, bonds, derivatives or other types of financial instruments traded on stock exchanges. In view of the above, opportunities are now emerging in which, based on relevant historical economic data, generative artificial intelligence can be trained so as to build a system that automatically conducts sectoral and macroeconomic analyses, economic and financial analyses of business entities, fundamental and technical analyses for securities priced on stock exchanges.

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Deep learning is a branch of machine learning that uses artificial neural networks to perform complex calculations on large datasets. It mimics the structure and function of the human brain and trains machines by learning from examples. Deep learning is widely used by industries that deal with complex problems, such as health care, eCommerce, entertainment, and advertising.

This post explores the basic types of artificial neural networks and how they work to enable deep learning algorithms.

Hello everyone,

I am currently working on a project related to medical imaging and deep learning. Part of my work involves illustrating these complex concepts through diagrams and figures. However, I'm having a hard time finding a software tool that suits my specific needs.

Ideally, I am looking for a program that allows for high-quality rendering of medical imaging data, can incorporate elements of deep learning such as neural network architectures, and has an intuitive interface that's easy to navigate. It would also be great if the software has a good range of customization options to adjust the look and feel of the diagrams to my preference.

Could anyone suggest software tools they have had a positive experience with in this context? Any guidance on learning resources or tutorials for the suggested software would be greatly appreciated as well.

Thank you in advance for your assistance and suggestions.

Want to get experitise in use of deep learning models for health sciences like heart disease prediction among others. Also want to know which libraries, frameworks, and packages can be used in this regard?

..

Hello,

I'm writing paper and used various optimizers to train model. I changed them during training step to get out of local minimum, and I know that people do that, but I don't know how to name that technique in the paper. Does it even have a name?

It is like simulated annealing in optimization, but instead of playing with temperature (step) we change optimizers between Adam, SDG and RMSprop. I can say for sure that it gave fantastic results.

P.S. Thank you for replies but learning rate scheduling is for leaning rate changing, optimizer scheduling is for other optimizer parameters, in general it is hyperparameter tuning. What I'm asking is about switching between optimizers, not modifying their parameters.

Thanks for support,

Andrius Ambrutis

How would you address the issue of model interpretability in deep learning, especially when dealing with complex neural network architectures, to ensure transparency and trust in the decision-making process?

The technologically leading companies currently building rockets and other spacecraft have aspirations to build a new generation of spaceplanes and bring intercontinental aviation into the era of intercontinental paracosmic flights taking place near the orbital sphere of planet Earth. On the other hand, the aforementioned leading technology companies are building rockets, satellites and space landers to be sent to Earth's moon and also those to be sent to the planet Mars as well. Manned flights to the Earth's Moon are to be resumed and manned bases are to be built on the Moon in the 2020s perspective of the current 21st century. then manned missions to the planet Mars are to be implemented in the 1930s perspective of the current century. It may also be that in the perspective of the next decades, manned bases will be built on Mars and perhaps there will be colonization of this as yet inaccessible planet for humans. Perhaps in the perspective of the second half of the present century there will already be periodic manned missions, space expeditions, tourist space travel to Mars. If this were to happen, it would not be out of the question that participating such manned missions, space expeditions, tourist space travel to Mars will be carried out using spacecraft that will be largely autonomously controlled with the help of highly technologically advanced generative artificial intelligence.

The key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology are described in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In view of the above, with the development of renewable and emission-free energy sources there are many technological and environmental constraints on certain categories of spent materials used in this type of energy. On the one hand, it is necessary for power companies to make investments in electricity transmission and storage networks. On the other hand, economical technologies for the production of low-cost energy storage and recycling, disposal of used batteries and photovoltaic panels, including the recovery of rare metals as part of the aforementioned disposal process, are still to be developed. In addition, the problem of overheating of batteries in electric vehicles and the occurrence of situations of spontaneous combustion of these devices and dangerous, difficult to extinguish fires of the said vehicles are still not fully resolved. If the solution to such problems is mainly a matter of necessary improvements in technology or the creation of new, innovative technology, then arguably generative artificial intelligence technology should come to the rescue in this regard.

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

Important aspects of the implementation of the green transformation of the economy, including the development of renewable and zero-carbon energy sources I included in my article below:

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT AS A KEY ELEMENT OF THE PRO-ECOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE ECONOMY TOWARDS GREEN ECONOMY AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY

I invite you to discuss this important topic for the future of the planet's biosphere and climate.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

..

I am interested to learn machine learning and Deep learning ,so in this area please suggestions best one

Hello,

I am looking for articles in which the analysis is done with the Machine Learning Models and Neural Networks. Kindly suggest any such articles published within last 1 or 2 years.

Thank You.

If the ChatGPT, with the passage of time and the receipt of successive questions using machine learning and/or deep learning technology, were to continuously and successively improve its answers, i.e. the texts generated as an answer to the questions asked, including the same questions asked, then the answers obtained should, with time, become more and more perfect in terms of content and the scale of errors, non-existent "facts", new but not factually correct "information" created by the ChatGPT in the automatically generated texts should gradually decrease. But has the current, next generation of ChatGPT 4.0 already applied sufficiently advanced, automatic learning to this tool to create ever more perfect texts in which the number of errors should decrease? This is a key question that will largely determine the possibilities for practical applications of this artificial intelligence technology in various fields, human professions, industries and economic sectors. On the other hand, the possibilities of the aforementioned learning process to create better and better answers to the questions asked will become increasingly limited over time if the knowledge base of 2021 used by ChatGPT is not updated and enriched with new data, information, publications, etc. over an extended period of time. In the future, it is likely that such processes of updating and expanding the source database will be carried out. The issue of carrying out such updates and extensions to the source knowledge base will be determined by the technological advances taking place and the increasing pressure on the business use of such technologies.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

A SWOT analysis details the strengths and weaknesses of the past and present performance of an entity, institution, process, problem, issue, etc., as well as the opportunities and threats relating to the future performance of a particular issue in the next months, quarters or, most often, the next few or more years. Artificial intelligence technology has been conceptually known for more than half a century. However, its dynamic and technological development has occurred especially in recent years. Currently, many researchers and scientists are involved in many publications and debates undertaken at scientific symposiums and conferences and other events on various social, ethical, business, economic and other aspects concerning the development of artificial intelligence technology and eggs applications in various sectors of the economy, in various fields of potential applications implemented in companies, enterprises, financial and public institutions. Many of the determinants of impact and risks associated with the development of generative artificial intelligence technology currently under consideration may be heterogeneous, ambiguous, multifaceted, depending on the context of potential applications of the technology and the operation of other impact factors. For example, the issue of the impact of technology development on future labor markets is not a homogeneous and unambiguous problem. On the one hand, the more critical considerations of this impact mainly point to the potentially large scale of loss of employment for many people employed in various jobs in a situation where it turns out to be cheaper and more convenient for businesses to hire highly sophisticated robots equipped with generative artificial intelligence instead of humans for various reasons. However, on the other hand, some experts analyzing the ongoing impact of AI technology applications on labor markets give more optimistic visions of the future, pointing out that in the future of the next few years, artificial intelligence will not largely deprive people of work only this work will change, it will support employed workers in the effective implementation of work, it will significantly increase the productivity of work carried out by people using specific solutions of generative artificial intelligence technology at work and, in addition, labor markets will also change in other ways, ie. through the emergence of new types of professions and occupations realized by people, professions and occupations arising from the development of AI technology applications. In this way, the development of AI applications may generate both opportunities and threats in the future, and in the same application field, the same development area of a company or enterprise, the same economic sector, etc. Arguably, these kinds of dual scenarios of the potential development of AI technology and its applications in the future, different scenarios made up of positive and negative aspects, can be considered for many other factors of influence on the said development or for different fields of application of this technology. For example, the application of artificial intelligence in the field of new online media, including social media sites, is already generating both positive and negative aspects. Positive aspects include the use of AI technology in online marketing carried out on social media, among others. On the other hand, the negative aspects of the applications available on the Internet using AI solutions include the generation of fake news and disinformation by untrustworthy, unethical Internet users. In addition to this, the use of AI technology to control an autonomous vehicle or to develop a recipe for a new drug for particularly life-threatening human diseases. On the one hand, this technology can be of great help to humans, but what happens when certain mistakes are made that result in a life-threatening car accident or the emergence after a certain period of time of particularly dangerous side effects of the new drug. Will the payment of compensation by the insurance company solve the problem? To whom will responsibility be shifted for such possible errors and their particularly negative effects, which we cannot completely exclude at present? So what other examples can you give of ambiguous in the consequences of artificial intelligence applications? what are the opportunities and risks of past applications of generative artificial intelligence technology vs. what are the opportunities and risks of its future potential applications? These considerations can be extended if, in this kind of SWOT analysis, we take into account not only generative artificial intelligence, its past and prospective development, including its growing number of applications, but when we also take into account the so-called general, general artificial intelligence that may arise in the future. General, general artificial intelligence, if built by technology companies, will be capable of self-improvement and with its capabilities for intelligent, multi-criteria, autonomous processing of large sets of data and information will in many respects surpass the intellectual capacity of humans.

The key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology are described in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I am trying to train a CNN model in Matlab to predict the mean value of a random vector (the Matlab code named Test_2 is attached). To further clarify, I am generating a random vector with 10 components (using rand function) for 500 times. Correspondingly, the figure of each vector versus 1:10 is plotted and saved separately. Moreover, the mean value of each of the 500 randomly generated vectors are calculated and saved. Thereafter, the saved images are used as the input file (X) for training (70%), validating (15%) and testing (15%) a CNN model which is supposed to predict the mean value of the mentioned random vectors (Y). However, the RMSE of the model becomes too high. In other words, the model is not trained despite changing its options and parameters. I would be grateful if anyone could kindly advise.

I have selected two deep learning models CNN and sae for data analysis of a 1 d digitized data set. I need to justify choice of these two dl models in comparison to other dl and standard ml models. I am using ga to optimize hyper parameters values of the two dl models. Can you give some inputs for this query.thanks.

Need suggestions for publishing my review paper in free sci/Esci journals.

1. Need suggestions for inclusion of novelty in my review paper of object detection

2. Suggestions on future development and directions for object detection using deep learning

3. Any graphical representation of comparison of literature for Obj Det using deep learning

4. How a SOTA review paper can be insightful for readers.

TQ and welcome suggestions on these details.

..

How Deep Learning or Machine Learning or Artificial Intelligence is used in Medical Image Captioning

At present, some researchers use machine learning to achieve one-to-one mapping of spectral information and response, and achieve one-to-one mapping of high sensitivity and wide measurement range. Does this method have drawbacks? How likely is it to work in practice?

Looking for some project ideas using deep/shallow learning for my Masters. Would like to know if there any research gaps, could be taken on medical imaging or etc.

..

Seeking insights on leveraging deep learning techniques to improve the accuracy and efficiency of object recognition in machine vision systems.

How to integrate two different ML or DL models in a single framework?

Hello,

I am a civil engineering graduate, interested in research on transportation with application of machine learning or deep learning. My skillsets include GIS, Python and transportation modelling. I am open to learn any new skills required. Let's collaborate and work in some interesting research.

Thank you,

Regards,

Subash Gupta

During the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic, due to quarantine periods implemented in many countries, restrictions on the use of physical retail outlets, cultural services, various public places and government-imposed lockdowns of business entities operating in selected, mainly service sectors of the economy, the use of web-based videoconferencing platforms increased significantly. In addition to this, the periodic transfer of education to a remote form conducted via online video conferencing platforms has also increased the scale of ICT use in education processes. On the other hand, since the end of 2022, in connection with the release of one of the first intelligent chatbots, i.e. ChatGPT, on the Internet by the company OpenAI, there has been an acceleration in the development of artificial intelligence applications in various fields of information Internet services and also in the implementation of generative artificial intelligence technology to various aspects of business activities conducted in companies and enterprises. The tools made available on the Internet by technology companies operating in the formula of intelligent language models have been taught to converse with Internet users, with people through the use of technologies modeled on the structure of the human neuron of artificial neural networks, deep learning using knowledge bases, databases that have accumulated large amounts of data and information downloaded from many websites. Nowadays, there are opportunities to combine the above-mentioned technologies so that new applications and/or functionalities of web-based video conferencing platforms can be obtained, which are enriched with tools based on generative artificial intelligence.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Imagine machines that can think and learn like humans! That's what AI is all about. It's like teaching computers to be smart and think for themselves. They can learn from mistakes, understand what we say, and even figure things out without being told exactly what to do.

Just like a smart friend helps you, AI helps machines be smart too. It lets them use their brains to understand what's going on, adjust to new situations, and even solve problems on their own. This means robots can do all sorts of cool things, like helping us at home, driving cars, or even playing games!

There's so much happening in Artificial Intelligence (AI), with all sorts of amazing things being developed for different areas. So, let's discuss all the cool stuff AI is being used for and the different ways it's impacting our lives. From robots and healthcare to art and entertainment, anything and everything AI is up to is on the table!

Machine Learning: Computers can learn from data and improve their performance over time, like a student studying for a test.

Natural Language Processing (NLP): AI can understand and generate human language, like a translator who speaks multiple languages.

Computer Vision: Machines can interpret and make decisions based on visual data, like a doctor looking at an X-ray.

Robotics: AI helps robots perceive their environment and make decisions, like a self-driving car navigating a busy street.

Neural Networks: Artificial neural networks are inspired by the human brain and are used in many AI applications, like a chess computer that learns to make winning moves.

Ethical AI: We need to use AI responsibly and address issues like bias, privacy, and job displacement, like making sure a hiring algorithm doesn't discriminate against certain groups of people.

Autonomous Vehicles: AI-powered cars can drive themselves, like a cruise control system that can take over on long highway drives.

AI in Healthcare: AI can help doctors diagnose diseases, plan treatments, and discover new drugs, like a virtual assistant that can remind patients to take their medication.

Virtual Assistants: AI-powered virtual assistants like Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant can understand and respond to human voice commands, like setting an alarm or playing music.

Game AI: AI is used in games to create intelligent and challenging enemies and make the game more fun, like a boss battle in a video game that gets harder as you play.

Deep Learning: Deep learning is a powerful type of machine learning used for complex tasks like image and speech recognition, like a self-driving car that can recognize stop signs and traffic lights.

Explainable AI (XAI): As AI gets more complex, we need to understand how it makes decisions to make sure it's fair and unbiased, like being able to explain why a loan application was rejected.

Generative AI: AI can create new content like images, music, and even code, like a program that can write poetry or compose music.

AI in Finance: AI is used in the financial industry for things like algorithmic trading, fraud detection, and customer service, like a system that can spot suspicious activity on a credit card.

Smart Cities: AI can help make cities more efficient and sustainable, like using traffic cameras to reduce congestion.

Facial Recognition: AI can be used to recognize people's faces, but there are concerns about privacy and misuse, like using facial recognition to track people without their consent.

AI in Education: AI can be used to personalize learning, automate tasks, and provide educational support, like a program that can tutor students in math or English.

An important issue concerning the prospects for the development of artificial intelligence technology and its applications is also the question of obtaining by the built intelligent systems taught to perform highly complex tasks based on generative artificial intelligence a certain range of independence and self-improvement, repairing certain randomly occurring faults, errors, system failures, etc. For many years, there have been deliberations and discussions on the issue of obtaining a greater range of autonomy in making certain decisions on self-improvement, repair of system faults, errors caused by random external events by systems built on the basis of generative artificial intelligence technology. On the one hand, if there are built and developed, for example, security systems built on the basis of generative artificial intelligence technology in public institutions or commercially operating business entities providing a certain category of security for people, it is an important issue to give these intelligent systems a certain degree of autonomy in decision-making if in a situation of a serious crisis, natural disaster, geological disaster, earthquake, flood, fire, etc. a human being could make a decision too late relative to the much greater speed of response that an automated, intelligent, specific security, emergency response, early warning system for specific new risks, risk management system, crisis management system, etc. can have. However, on the other hand, whether a greater degree of self-determination is given to an automated, intelligent information system, including a specified security system then the scale of the probability of a failure occurring that will cause changes in the operation of the system with the result that the specified automated, intelligent and generative artificial intelligence-based system may be completely out of human control. In order for an automated system to quickly return to correct operation on its own after the occurrence of a negative, crisis external factor causing a system failure, then some scope of autonomy and self-decision-making for the automated, intelligent system should be given. However, to determine what this scope of autonomy should be is to first carry out a multifaceted analysis and diagnosis on the impact factors that can act as risk factors and cause malfunction, failure of the operation of an intelligent information system. Besides, if, in the future, generative artificial intelligence technology is enriched with super-perfect general artificial intelligence technology, then the scope of autonomy given to an intelligent information system that has been built with the purpose of automating the operation of a risk management system, providing a high level of safety for people may be high. However, if at such a stage in the development of super-perfect general artificial intelligence technology, however, an incident of system failure due to certain external or perhaps also internal factors were to occur, then the negative consequences of such a system slipping out of human control could be very large and currently difficult to assess. In this way, the paradox of building and developing systems developed within the framework of super-perfect general artificial intelligence technology may be realized. This paradox is that the more perfect, automated, intelligent system will be built by a human, an information system far beyond the capacity of the human mind, the capacity of a human to process and analyze large sets of data and information is, on the one hand, because such a system will be highly perfect it will be given a high level of autonomy to make decisions on crisis management, to make decisions on self-repair of system failure, to make decisions much faster than the capacity of a human in this regard, and so on. However, on the other hand, when, despite the low level of probability of an abnormal event, the occurrence of an external factor of a new type, the materialization of a new category of risk, which will nevertheless cause the effective failure of a highly intelligent system then this may lead to such a system being completely out of human control. The consequences, including, first of all, the negative consequences for humans of such a slipping of an already highly autonomous intelligent information system based on super general artificial intelligence, would be difficult to estimate in advance.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

The key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technologies are described in my article below:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Thank you,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Seeking insights on leveraging deep learning techniques to improve the precision of speech recognition systems when confronted with ambient noise, crucial for applications in diverse, real-world scenarios.