Science topics: Control Systems EngineeringFiltering
Science topic
Filtering - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Filtering, and find Filtering experts.
Questions related to Filtering
I want some good references on modeling the LCL filter in stationary frame in continuous time. (state space)
and if a MATLAB code is available that would be great.
Thanks
Dears,
I'm using the UV/vis method to determine water-soluble chrome in cement as follows:
I take particulate mass from dichromate to make a stock solution then take various volumes of aliquots into a 50 ml volumetric flask to set up a calibration curve.
for measuring the sample, I take a 25 g sample and 25 ml of water then filter and take 5 ml of filtrate into a 50 ml volumetric flask and dilute to mark with water after adding a color indicator.
my inquiry why don't I consider 50 ml dilution of aliquoted sample in the calculation equation ? and if I deviate from the method and make a dilution of the aliquoted sample 100 ml instead of 50 ml what does the formal calculation equation become?
#analytical Chemistry
I am working on EEG classification problem and have collected my own data set ,at first step I applied filters and ICA than decomposed it by applying db3 at level 6 ,after trying all kind of known feature(Non Statistical i.e. Hjorth features, Entropy, band Power and Statistical features mean, median, variance ,skewness ,std_deviation ) accuracy with SVM classifier with 10-K fold method has stuck at 63% ,where as when i fed the chunk of cleaned and pruned data to SVM the accuracy of different chunks is 80% .what should i report in paper please guide.
Hi guys,
I was wondering if it is okay to filter complete StemFlex medium or if I'll lose important factors!
Many thanks!
Hi, I have transfected my HEK293 cells with pcDNA3.1_plasmid of interest with EGFP by using lipotransfection method. Post transfection 48h the egfp expression looks good with more than 50% transfection rate. Started G418 selection (DMEM+10% FBS+ 2mg/mL G418). Post transfection 48h, the cells transfer from 24wp to 12wp to create space for G418 medium to get to non-transfected cells. Medium replacement done daily, and after a week, fresh selective medium is prepared. Massive cell death observed after 2 days of G418 selection.
Day 7, 95% of non transfected cell die. Colonies/ egfp rounded cell clump together can be observed and a lot of resistant cells survived but did not attached under the G418 selective stress.
Day 8, the selective medium reduce to 1mg/mL and Day 10 reduce to 500ug/mL and day 12 reduce to 250ug/mL hoping that the resistant cells will attach and starting to expand.
Unfortunately, the non transfected cells starting to grow rapidly and the cells with EGFP did not grow so much. Any comments and thoughts are welcome. The reason I use 2mg/mL from to start becuase I have done 1mg/mL to kill the HEK293 but it wasn’t effective. The active G418 percentage is 80.9% and I have reconstituted G418 with 100mM HEPES buffer And filtered.
I have read about for the survival cells to expand it might take a long time under the selective pressure. When is the right time to reduce the antibiotic?
the attached image is Day 10 under G418 selection. Should I be more patient and keep the G418 concentration high and wait for the colonies to attach and expand?
I got some bands of my compound in TLC. I want to get those compounds for further analysis means for quantification purpose. After scratching the band I have mixed with methanol in a conical flask and mixed throughly with magnetic stirrer for 15 mins. After this i want to filter this solvent. My question is for this filtration which filter paper I will prefer, wheather I will go for whatman 40 or 42 grade or something else.
After cleaning your biochar, do you use filtration using GF/F filter or do you use syringe to extract the filtrate and put it on cuvette and subject it to UV-VIS?
Thank you!
For Electric conductivity (EC), I have taken 10 g of soil in 25 ml of water and directly measured it without filtering the suspension. Is this correct ?
Hi all,
I am doing CRISPR on Hek293T cells. After FACS, the one cell wells do not survive/grow only the wells were 50/100 cells were plated. Any tips to improve the survival rate for the one cell cultures? I use DMEM high glucose with 10 % FBS. The cells are 11-15 µm, so I can not use a 22 µm filter to filter medium from other cells.
Thanks a lot.
In XRD, I think there is a significant relationship between the target and the filter here, and the target has one more proton than the filter, is this true or false? What is the reason in both cases?
I am using a fluorescence microscope with DAPI filter, here are the specifications:
Excitation wavelength: 360/40 nm
Emission wavelength: 460/50 nm
Dichroic mirror wavelength: 400 nm
I want to label my cells with cyan fluorescent protein. I just want to know if our DAPI filter can detect the CFP. Thanks.
I used to prepare DMEM-powdered media for the cell culture use. The last step of media preparation is media filtration using 0.2um filters. Meanwhile, in case of 0.2um filters shortage, is it possible to alternatively prepare a sterile media for the cell culture without using 0.2um filters. Like to use 0.45um filters and then autoclave the media to ensure the sterile condition of the prepared media?
I've managed to isolate the phage for Clostridium perfringens, but whenever I tried to filter it even with the biggest pore size of 0.45 μm the phage didn't manage to pass through. I also have done the filtration using nylon-type filter and PES-type filter. Both filters yield negative results. Anyone found a similar problem and how do I solve this particular problem?
After formulation, can SBF be sterilized in the autoclaved without damaging the components? Or should it be sterile-filtered?
Many studies and industries are known to filter coal- syngas by means of assemblies of candle filters. Is it possible to/ Do any systems exist to instead use huge ceramic monolithic devices (similar to DPF) for removal of particulate matter from syngas?
I am trying to extract microplastics from water samples and follow the standard method. As per the standard method after digestion and density separation, the final step is filtration with glass fiber filter paper and then analysis.
But my query is in freshwater samples after extraction we are getting a few very small microplastic particles that get stuck to the membrane only after filtration and it is very difficult to get a residue for FTIR analysis.
If we give filter paper as it is for ATR- FTIR analysis then how it is assumed that all particles spread over filter paper will be detected?
As in ATR FTIR point of contact of the beam is at one point only.
So can anybody suggest how to extract microplastic particles that are stuck on glass filter paper to get particles for any analysis?
hi,
I need a practical calculation and design for designing passive harmonic filter inductors.
and the information about core sizing and considerations for 3-phase system.
Does anyone work with expression in S2 cells? How efficient is the transfection using Lipofectamine 2000? Everytime I try to transfect using CaCl2 I get a cloudy media, and it seems that the culture is infected with a small bacteria, even filtrating all reagents with a 0.1 filter.
Hello everyone,
We have a water treatment unit where the input water is TAP WATER. Tap water pass throw three steps in this order:
Softner ==> Filters (cotton filter+charcoal filter) ==> Reverse Osmosis
We are using water after reverse osmosis.
My question is what are the conductivity, pH and hardness limit and acceptable values of the tap water, water after softner, water after softner+filters and water after the three steps.
If you could provide references and/or standard I will be very grateful.
Thank you for your precious time.
I want it to filter Fetal Heart Beat Sound obtained from the Piezoelectric sensor
SRR no. input filtered denoisedF denoisedR merged Nonchim % drop
SRR15372855 210711 186522 175583 176162 116563 36509 83%
SRR15372856 209697 183184 173837 174328 127588 38205 82%
SRR15372857 151093 137752 133022 133438 107083 25667 83%
SRR15372858 186504 164448 158409 159015 120511 28185 85%
SRR15372859 152065 139938 132967 133593 96672 34233 77%
SRR15372860 156315 142035 134111 135300 94163 32878 79%
in EEG preprocessing filtering through window technique which filter is best what is the sampling frquency pass band frequency
I need this medium for cultivation of cervical epithelial cells. It is recommended to use EGF at a concentration of 0,01 ng/ml. In my vial I have 2,5 µg with a concentration of 0,0378 µg/µl (noted by manufacturer). This would mean for 0,01 ng/ml in 500 ml of medium I need to take 1,32 µl of the EGF vial. This seems very few. Especially because I read, that the medium - once supplemented - is stable only for two weeks.
How long do you use supplemented K-SFM?
Do you prepare less than 500 ml medium?
Do you sterile filter the BPE?
Do you have any other tipps?
Thank you very much in advance!
Immigration: Filter @Borders
Refugee: Establish @Nation
Voluntary: Move @USA #States
Bio-Economic Ecology
I have 0.2% Chitosan solution dissolved in 1% acetic acid and after filteration using 0.2 µm filter paper, small white particles perciptated I do not what these particles are. This the first time for me to encounter such problem. Do you have any idea about this?
I am looking for a new source for filters for mosquito mouth aspirators similar to the attached image. Any suggestions much appreciated
Is it correct to filter the extracts we obtain with Whatman filter paper and use them directly in experiments to investigate the bioactivity of phytochemical substances? Or is it correct to first centrifuge the extracts we obtain, then filter the supernatant and use them in experiments?
Have you any data about the operating costs of CERAMIC membranes over for example 50 years? what about sand filter and polymeric membranes? The use of all of them is after coagulation, but for sand filter we have clarifier. For MF CERAMIC membranes (or polymeric membranes), the filter will act as clarifier. Any data for any types of CERAMIC membranes (MF, UF, ...) can be useful.
I am interested in utilizing a screw-press to effectively dewater a slurry. Allow me to provide you with the specifications of the slurry in question:
- Flow: The slurry has a flow rate of 50 m3/h.
- Particle Size: The D80 value is 50 micrometers.
- Composition: The slurry consists of 1% Cu, 8% Hematite Iron, approximately 90% non-mineral clay soil, and 1% other elements.
- Solid to Water Ratio: The solid to water ratio is 30%.
- Solid to Slurry Ratio: The solid to slurry ratio is approximately 24%.
My inquiry pertains to the suitability and standards associated with employing a screw press for filtering and dewatering this particular slurry. Additionally, I am seeking recommendations on where I can access a catalog or book that provides research data on this equipment.
Thank you for your assistance.
Best regards,
Hamid
Hello All
We using Grid connecetd Inverter using LCL Filter, we are unble damp low fréquences (like 200 hz to 350 hz)
Can you please suggest How to attenuates low frequencies for grid current ?
LCL filter values fixed, any other solution to attenuates low frequinces for control point view ?
Please find the attached FFT analysais PNG file for your reference.
Hello,
I am currently doing a lab for an analytical lab where I am given beeswax mixed with brass, and trying to separate the copper and zinc from the brass in order to find out their amounts. How would I separate the wax and brass without compromising the quantity/quality of the brass? I was thinking an organic solvent like hexane or acetone, and filtering it out with a filter. Thanks
I am trying to get an insight of the above mentioned research paper, specially about the filtering process used to remove grid artifacts. However, I find it difficult to understand it correctly.
I would be much grateful if anyone could help me to clarify a few questions that I have.
My questions are as follows:
1) what are the pixel values of the Mean filter they used? they mention about using an improved Mean filter, but what is the improvement?
2) do they apply the Mean filter in the whole patch image (seems like it), or only in the grid signal region (characteristic peak range)?
3) what do they mean by (u1,v1) being Fmax value? does that mean that the center pixel of the Mean filter is replaced by this max value?
Thanks in advance!
Hello everyone,
I have a list of InChI strings in .csv by quetying pubchem using pubchempy. Alot of the returns are isotopes and multi-component compounds such as NaCl and methane-water.
Currently, I'm filtering out such compounds by having my script find "/i" for isotopes and
" , " (basically finding commas) in the InChI strings and filtering out compounds that have those.
Is there anything else you can suggest to make it better?
During storage of Ethanol (USP Grage) after filtration through 5-micron filter membrane. Particulate matter observed during storage. For that, we need to investigate the reason. Is any science behind for these particles' generation.
Highlights:
Erbium substitution in Ba2Co2Fe28-xO46 yields optimal magnetic behavior at x = 0.12 .
XRD analysis shows distinct X and W phases in Er-substituted hexaferrites which indicates structural modifications.
Low dielectric loss tangent suggests potential applications in filters and magnetic technology which includes antennas and inductors.
Properties unveiled
Enhanced magnetization at x = 0.12 with Erbium substitution.
Identification of X and W phases via XRD in Er-substituted hexaferrites.
Potential for technological applications due to low dielectric loss, beneficial for filters and magnetic devices.
Current Applications
Magnetic Devices: Hexaferrites with optimized properties find use in antennas, multilayer inductors, and resonators due to their tailored magnetic behavior.
Filter Technology: Low dielectric loss tangent makes them promising for filter applications, especially in telecommunications and electronic devices.
Microwave Absorbers: Potential utilization in absorbing microwave frequencies, particularly in technologies requiring absorption of electromagnetic waves
Future application
Advanced Electronics: Potential integration into next-gen electronic devices for improved performance leveraging their tailored magnetic and dielectric properties.
Sensor Technology: Utilization in sensitive sensors for diverse industries benefitting from their magnetic characteristics and potential for tuning sensitivity.
Emerging Energy Technologies: Exploration in energy-related applications such as energy harvesting or storage, leveraging their unique magnetic and dielectric behaviors for innovative solutions.
#Hexaferrites #Erbium #XRD #Magnetization
For lossless low-frequency applications, the study investigates the structural, thermal, magnetic, surface morphology, Raman spectroscopic, and dielectric properties of Cu-Cr co-substituted M-type barium hexaferrites.
The study focuses on the extraction of fresh mentha leaves from a local vegetable market in Ahmedabad, India. The leaves were cleansed, dried, and finely crushed before being mixed with distilled water. The resulting extract was then filtered using Whatman 125mm filter paper. The Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of BaCuxCrxFe12–2xO19 hexaferrites were analyzed using a simple heat treatment method. The samples showed two vibrational bands within the 400–650 cm−1 wavenumber, which correspond to the stretching vibrations of Fe-O. The absorption band (ν1-mode) signified the tetrahedral group, while the other band (ν2-mode) signified the ferrite system's distinctive bands. The FT-IR spectra showed two absorption bands, and XRD investigation revealed the formation of the M-phase along with BaFe2O4.
FESEM (Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy): Used to visualize the hexagonal shape of the substituted samples.
Raman Spectroscopy: Applied to analyze the successful replacement of Cu and Cr ions in place of Fe ions.
#LowFrequencyApplications #XRDanalysis #GreenSynthesis #Research #HexaFerriteSynthesis
Can clouds reflect incoming radiation and how much solar radiation is filtered by clouds?
Hello,
I have designed a composite band pass filter, BPF (LPF+HPF) using short and open stubs. I need to do mathematical analysis for this design using even/odd analysis and also ABCD parameters ...Can someone help me in this or refer a paper which has already done such analysis for similar kind of design.
Thanking in advance!!!
Best Regards
Nitin
I am working with emotiv EPOC headset. I captured 12 minutes continuous eeg data. In which 40 seconds is baseline data and the remaining eeg data is the data related to participants activities. I should mention that during the data collection i did not define any event.
To do data analysis, I am using "eeglab". When I import eeg data inside of eeglab it does not show me any events which is natural because I did not define any events. Even inside of "edf" file that EmotivPRO give to me there is not any columns for event.
But, after doing the following steps it shows me 23 events.
1- Remove baseline
2- Filter data (using FIR)
3- Automatic channel rejection
4- Automatic continuous rejection
5- Run ICA
Now, my problem is that if I can trust this data pre-processing or not?
When I reviewed the references for eeg data pre_processing the steps are as following:
1- Import event info
2- Re-referencing (if it is necessary)
3- Filter the data (High pass filter)
4- Remove bad channels
5- Run ICA
Hi, we have developed a method to generate mice organoids from brain tumors and I would like to use them for drug testing, however the organoids in culture vary greatly in size which would be a factor in analyzing the drugs effects. I would like to filter the organoids by size to normalize it in my experimental groups but I haven't found cell mesh strainers or filters with a filter size that would work (200-400um diameter).
I could try this ones (Pierce™ Tissue Strainers, 250 µm, 2.5 mL: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/87791?SID=srch-srp-87791#/87791?SID=srch-srp-87791), but I would like to know if there is any method that could give me a better range.
Thank you very much.
I'm sure I calculated the values correctly for an FIR Filter (In Excel - highlighted in yellow on attached) but when using the MATLAB Filter Designer, the Impulse Response seems off.
Attempt in MATLAB was for an Equiripple Low Pass FIR with an order of 17 so n= -8...0...8
Further into my work I experiment with the Hanning Window, which calculates and plots correctly so no idea what I'm doing wrong.
Any pointers on this are gratefully received.
Hello,
I have to run suspended sediment concentration test on 500 ml river water samples. I am using Pall membrane filter papers with 47 mm dia and 0.45-micron pore size. However, some samples take up to an hour to filter in the vacuum filtration setup. Is this very common? Should I go for a higher pore size ~ 1 -micron?
I have looked up online and read about it, but I'd appreciate a simpler definition. Thank you :)
Is it necessary to have a special microscope filter to visualize transient transferred mKeima cells? The microscope I have been using has the typical GFP and mCherry filters, but not a special filter to see mKeima fluorescence.
The delaminated T3C2X2 MXene solution was ~ 2 mg/mL. 50 mL of the above solution was filtered through 0.22 nm PTFE membrane and dried in vaccum at RT over night. But the film was not free-stranding. What is the problem? Concentration? PTFE membrane?
I have a structure of filter based photonic crystal slab. this filter is constituted by two waveguides coupled via cavity.
How can I control this filter linewidth?
Hello everyone,
I am conducting an isotherm/kinetics experiment to measure the capacity of a concrete filter/pervious concrete (a filter made of concrete) to remove heavy metals.
My question is, how can I measure how the percentage of the heavy metals removed is due to chemical precipitation and how much is due to the adsorption of heavy metals to the concrete filter?
Please take a look at the picture attached to see the concrete filter.
Please consider the following conditions:
The filter leaches Ca and carbonate, so precipitation happens.
The pH is constant at 12, and I cannot change it.
The adsorbent is in a filter stape as attached and is not in powder form. So, a part of precipitated heavy metal ions are trapped inside of the filter.
The picture has been extracted from Holmes et al. 2017 (Enhancing the Ability of Pervious Concrete to Remove Heavy Metals from Stormwater).
How to tune low pass filter parameters through heuristic optimization techniques?
Before doing DLS experiment, it is recommended that one should filter their solution to get rid of dusts, or make the stock solutions clean optically by usage of filter. But when it comes to doing DLS experiments in a diluted or semi-dilute polymer sample, how exactly does one decide upon the filter size to avoid removal of polymer chains by the filter or the probe particles dispersed in the polymer solution before conducting the DLS experiment?
One such papers that I have reffered is the works done by Koike, Akihiro, Norio Nemoto, Tadashi Inoue, and Kunihiro Osaki. “Dynamic Light Scattering and Dynamic Viscoelasticity of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) in Aqueous Borax Solutions. 1. Concentration Effect.” Macromolecules 28, no. 7 (March 1995): 2339–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00111a029.
Any kind of help regarding this will be appreciated! Thank you in advance.
I synthesized microcapsules and then centrifuged at 500rpm with water and later rinsed with absolute ethanol. Then, I vacuum filtered and spread the capsules on a filter paper with spatula, placed them in fume hood for 24 hours. But when I check them next day, they become like a membrane sticking to the bottom of filter paper or glass dish. What i am doing wrong here?
I am designing a high frequency filter using a loop resonator, one of the main goals is to achieve a reflection loss (S11) of -20db in a bandwidth of at least 500Mhz around 13.5 Ghz.
I used CST studio suite to simulate and design the filter, I used a frequency window of 0 - 20 Ghz at first, and achieved the desired filter (picture 1). I tried to simulate the same filter using a window of 0 - 30 Ghz(picture 2) and observed a harmonic at 27 Ghz, which is natural, but the first peak is now reduced to only -11db, the goal is not achieved. the question is, why is my first peak affected when I only changed the the frequency window ? which one of the two simulations would match measurements in case of a real produced and measured filter ?
As a heads-up, I'm a graduate student researcher in aerodynamics, and my specialty is not related to turbulence, although we work with turbulent flows. I'm an experimental fluid dynamicist. Therefore, I understand this question might be, in a sense, a demonstration of my ignorance on the subject.
I've seen many researchers over the years, both physical experimentalists and computational experimentalists, write papers that contain plots of measurements of turbulent quantities (i.e., velocity fluctuations, pressure fluctuations) in the format of a pre-multiplied power spectral density plot. This kind of semilog chart plots frequency or wave number in a logarithmic x-scale, attempting to capture the multi-scale behavior of turbulence. The spectral energy density is plotted in a linear scale, and the reasoning for pre-multiplying the energy density by the frequency/wavenumber in the y-axis is that the logarithmic scale of the x-axis warps the concept of integration by taking the area under the curve. Therefore, the pre-multiplication factor is a de-warping correction that is, by definition, mathematically correct.
However, it really bothers me that an uninteresting, broadband turbulence signal, such as a white noise filtered by the turbulence cascade (i.e.; k^(-5/3)) shows a typical low-pass filter energy spectrum in the traditional non pre-multiplied PSD plot and a peak in the pre-multiplied version of the PSD plot. This peak, which comes from a broadband signal, is a feature that can easily be misinterpreted because there is nothing to see. This is especially dangerous when the object of study is of increased complexity.
My current understanding of the appearance of this peak feature is just a product of the conformal mapping of the x-axis. A truly broadband signal (i.e., a delta function) would present a flat line in the non pre-multiplied PSD, and an exponentially rising line in the pre-multiplied PSD. The exponential compensates for the logarithmic scale. The interpretation mistake, in my view, is to associate the lower frequencies with low energy simply because they are stretched by the log scale, which makes the integration require a larger portion of the x-axis as its bounds if the delta_k (and not log(delta_k))is to be preserved.
So I went on a historical journey to attempt to pinpoint where exactly frequency spectra started to be displayed in this weird pre-multiplied scale, and who to blame. Tennekes and Lumley (1972) don't seem to mention this in their book. Neither many other books in turbulence later to come (list below):
Townsend (1980) - " The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow"
Chen, Chen and Holly (1987) - "Turbulence Measurements and Flow Modeling"
Landahl and Mollo-Christensen (1987) - "Turbulence and Random Processes in Fluid Mechanics"
Herring and McWilliams (1989) - "Lecture notes on turbulence"
I might be missing other literatures due to time/resource constraints. But the first mention of the pre-multiplied spectrum within my resources seems to be by Pope (2000), "Turbulent Flows". His mention is also rather casual: "As is the usual practice (...) the spectra are multiplied by k such that the area under the curve k*E(k) represents energy".
So I'm inclined to believe that this is either Pope's idea or that it has been popularized by Pope. As of now, my stance is that this approach/paradigm can be rather deceiving for the new generation of graduate data analysts because it gives a peak feature that allows people to look for things in an uninteresting flow that are not really there. And even though we are trained scientists, we are still very fragile to confirmation bias and it is a major effort to refrain from generating hypotheses to explain peak features we see. Many papers I've read claim, not even citing the source, that plots of that nature would have features where the energy concentrates. When in reality, the energy only concentrates in the peak because the logarithmic scale is squashing the energy together near the low-pass filter cutoff frequency.
So, what are your thoughts? If you find this particularly offensive because you believe the paradigm is correct and there is interpretability to peaks shown in this kind of representation, I'd really like to know what is your reasoning. Thanks for the discussion!
Hello.
I am working on heterologoulsy expressing and purifying a protein using the Bac-to-Bac method. The protein expresses as verified by western blotting. I typically do a 4.2 L expression using P2 baculovirus. I lyse the cells via sonication in the following buffer (5 mL per gram of wet cell mass): 20 mM Tris pH=8, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 5% glycerol, DNAseI, and protease/phosphatase inhibitor tablets. After sonication, I centrifuge the lysed cells for 1 hour at ~54,000 x g. After centrifugation the supernatant is not viscous and has a clear yellow tint. This clarified supernatant will clog the IMAC column (I have tried both HisTrap and self poured columns). Only when I filter all of the clarified supernatant using a 0.22 um syringe filter can I load without clogging. Does anyone know a better way to solve this issue of column clogging?
Hello everybody,
I analyzed a picture in ImageJ, but I encountered a problem with the threshold. I tried to count cells with analyzed particles. Before starting, I adjusted the picture by changing the contrast and applying a Gaussian filter. Until yesterday, I did it exactly as described, but today the program displayed a message: 'the threshold may not be correct (255-255).'
Can someone help me with this issue? Has anyone with the same problem been able to resolve it?
Hi, could someone tell me whether I can autoclave Glucose -6-phosphate or should opt for filter sterilization?
I added mistakely the oil to the oil mist filter opening of the dry vacuum pump, what will happen and how I can fix this problem?
Hello RG community, I am trying to find applications for the specific topic but in video format, I remember some papers are providing them as extra material but to filter such articles is quite tricky these days, Is there any way to search easily??
Dear Colleagues! I would like to know your advice about printing with titanium powder in an SLM printer. Will a HEPA filter be enough to filter the gas from residual printing products when working with titanium powder. Or should I use a different type of air filter?
Where can I find the tag to open a new submission? What additional attributes should be set to filter brunch of the specific subject for people searching for papers in specific area?
I need to prepare an RNAse free solution of LiCl, I have the LiCl in powder (molecular grade), but I don't know if I should dissolve it in nuclease free water and autoclave it, or DEPC water and autoclave, or just dissolve it in nuclease free water and use it, or after autoclaving, filter it?
Hi,
Many wideband DVBT antennas has integrated filter for filtering LTE and 5G signals. I have disassembled few of them and found internal filter inside antenna boom. Some kind of filtering can be done by not having resonators for specific length. Internal filter will have insertion loss, while specific construction I believe will be better, because no filter insertion loss. Is there any measurement methods to do to know why antenna filtering (due to construction or due to discrete component filter hidden). Let's treat antenna as black box and we need to determine filtering type by not seeing antenna construction.
Thank you in advance
My lab uses LTS pipettes and I am in need of tips with the following criteria: 200uL, filtered, thin/skinny, low bind for a nuclei isolation protocol. Does anyone use tips like these? It's not the easiest thing to search the internet for. Thank you!
I'm in the process of creating classification models using a substantial dataset (approximately an MxM matrix). To enhance the performance of these models, I'm planning to conduct some feature selection as a preliminary step. It seems like a common practice to start with variance filtering, which involves eliminating variables X with var(X) that's close to zero. Given that my dataset contains variables with varying orders of magnitude, I'm unsure whether I should normalize the data [x - mean(x)] / var(x) before or after applying this variance-based feature selection.
For context, I'm aiming to build several models using a batch approach, which includes Logistic Regression, LDA, QDA, k-NN, Naive Bayes, Decision Trees, Random Forest, XGBoost, BART, among others.
I would greatly appreciate any insights into the optimal sequence for these preprocessing steps.
I want to understand better what happens with the results of a XRD test on a pure Nickel powder with a Cu tube. If possible, I would like to discuss the possibilities of analyzing a sample with, and without a Ni filter.
After the arrival of ChatGPT, the Q&A section in researchgate is full of people copy pasting from ChatGPT and similar tools. The sad thing is that the most of the answers are not to the point but a detailed generic essays. Since banning them is not a solution, I wanted to start a discussion on adding a tag "Possibly generated by AI" to such answers (from ChatGPT) and then to add a filter to genuinely find answers by experts. I still think Q&A section in researchgate has relevance in the era of ChatGPT.
When lysing E. coli for recombinant protein expression, I utilized a lysis buffer composed of 1M Tris-HCl, Triton X-100, glycerol, lysozyme, MgCl2, and a protease inhibitor cocktail. After lysing the E. coli, I centrifuged it at 13000rpm for 1 hour and collected the resulting supernatant. My intention was to pass this supernatant through a 0.45μm cellulose acetate syringe filter to eliminate any remaining cell debris. However, the filter became easily clogged. I'm wondering which components might be causing this issue. Could it be the conditions of centrifugation being too mild, or something else? The volume to be centrifuged in each tube is typically 200mL.
Hello everyone,
I am encountering bacterial growth in my diluted western primary antibodies (in TBS, without any milk/bsa, with 0.01% NaZ). We keep the antibodies in +4 C since we use them frequently (Our incubations are also o/n at +4 C). Almost every 2-3 weeks I observe the contamination. I filter the antibodies with 0.4um filter every 1-2 months.
I am wondering why there is that much of bacterial growth even with NaZ. Also, is there a better way of decontaminating antibodies? Can I keep the antibodies in -20 C (how many times I can freeze/thaw them?)
Hi. I am purifying a protein using metal affinity chromatography. After purification, I want to get rid of the imidazole (from the elution buffer) and switch to a new buffer that is appropriate for assays and structural work. However, when I attempt to exchange the buffer or concentrate my protein, I lose almost all of it (80 - 95% protein loss). I have tried regenerated cellulose centrifugal filters, dialysis using a cellulose membrane and a desalting column . Is there anything I can try to switch the buffer without losing so much protein?
Hi, Can lipid nanoparticles larger than 200 nm pass through the 0.2 filter due to flexibility?
Nowadays I see many DVBT antennas on the market that announces to have LTE or 5G filters. Is there any techniques to do filter in the yagi design (parasitic element to filter specific frequencies) or is it possible in the baluns only? I have ordered few antennas, but there are no LTE discrete filter, but it looks like they have some kind of filtering characteristics. From me experience I know that discrete LTE or 5G filter would be better, but what are techniques to do this without any components or stubs?
Thank you in advance
recently I bought the Fisher brand pipette tip: https://www.fishersci.com/shop/products/sureone-aerosol-barrier-pipette-tips-2/02-707-432?searchHijack=true&searchTerm=sureone-aerosol-barrier-pipette-tips-2&searchType=Rapid&matchedCatNo=02-707-432
From the website, it says it's filtered. However, I got so confused by their packaging box labeled: "Comprehensive line of non-filter and aerosol barrier pipet tip"
How does this happen? Is any difference between Non-filter and aerosol barrier tips? I always think they are the same concept.
We accidentally took the wrong filters into bsl3. We cant get anything out without being autoclaved. So do they survive autoclavable temperatures?
Hi everyone,
I wanted to ask some advice on EPSC detection using Neuromatic in IgorPro. I'm quite new to the software and I'm struggling to detect true events, it still includes a lot of noise.
A few things I struggle with are:
- It generally detects a lot of noise being an event. In some recordings the noise level is a bit higher. Even when I increase the threshold, still quite some noise is being picked up. Do you use a threshold of x ampl below baseline, or standard deviation? Or does the template matching work better? What threshold do you use.
- It does not accurately put the onset of the event. Often it puts the onset too early, well before the event actually starts. I've played quite a bit with changing the detection parameters for onset / baseline but haven't figured out a good setting. Do you have some advice?
- I wonder if I should filter the data before starting the event detection. Do people use a filter and if yes, what kind of filter do you use?
- I was wondering if there is a way in the software to filter events for certain settings and then visualize them? I now copy the output to excel, sort it and for example exclude some events based on the rise time, but it is then really hard to find back the events in the software to check if what I'm excluding I should actually excluded. Does anyone know of a way to sort data into the different Sets based on a certain parameter being higher or lower than x?
I use the software for data from in vitro cultured neurons and brain slices. It is especially a struggle with in vitro cultured neurons where our noise level usually is a bit higher.
It's a lot of questions but I hope someone can give me some advice on how to perform this analysis using IgorPro Neuromatic.
Thanks already!!
Anouk
Hi all, here in Chile we are facing a brutal shortage of consumables of Merck-Sigma-Millipore, specially after the fusion of Merck with Sigma and the pandemia, anyway the thing is that ultra filters from Millipore are taking 6 to 8 months to reach us! and we base many of our projects in ultrafiltration. The question es: do you know of a reliable (trsutable) substitutes for Amicon ultrafilters? Gracias
Cells are disrupted and debris are removed using a 0.2 μm filter to obtain enzymes. However, after filtering(remove debris) , the value of the titre is very low. why happen to low enzymes titre?
Step : culture => disruption(high titre value) ==> filter(remove debris) => titre(Low titre value)
What are the advantages of the method of counting bacteria with filter paper and in what cases is it mostly used?
I am new to Matlab and don’t have coding experience and need to process and analyze EMG signal files.
The files are in EDF format, and I have a script for converting it to .txt. Next, I need to filter the data, convert it to RMS, Fast Fourier Transform and get the Mean frequency of spectral power from certain 50ms intervals.
I’ve tried a lot of scripts and none of them seemed to work.
After filtering and converting, it would be great if I could have a way to see the whole file, select the intervals I needed, and see the mean frequency of spectral power of each interval.
Assuming that both are heat inactivated and sterile filtered, is there a difference between normal goat serum and donor goat serum. I can't seem to find any major difference between Is their an advantage of one over the other if the application is for immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence.
Thanks
Hi all, I have scRNA data generated from Rapsody platform and analysed in seven bridges platform. Now could you please give me an idea how to deal with seven bridges platform output files for seurat R scRNA analysis. Mainly i need Filtered Feature, Barcodes, and Matrix files for analysis.
Currently, I am doing research in image filtering. I came across this strange result where with an increase in sigma value PSNR decreases while SSIM increases.
I will attach a document where I have discussed it more thoroughly.
After centrifugation, I pass the suspension through the syringe filters, but the bacteria still grows in the culture medium.. How can I completely remove it from the culture? (Autoclaving and tyndallization should not be carried out).
1. In the practice of structural dynamics and control, non-minimum phase systems are common, and for the needs of motion and vibration control, we sometimes have to find a minimum phase one close to it. We can do this using structure modification、parameter adjustment, sensor position re-allocation, parallel compensator, series filter, output reconstruction, etc.
2. There seems to be a "critical" sytems in practice, for example, when adjusting the sensor position, when the sensor approaches the direction of the actuator, there will be a critical position, and when it approaches near, we obtain a minimum phase system.
3. Can we construct the concept of "the closest least phase system of the non-minimum phase system", just like the concept of "the closest linear system of the nonlinear system".
4. It is guessed that such a "closest least phase system" should (1) have a steady-state response and low-frequency response that is consistent or close to the original non-minimum phase system under closed loop; (2) Its inverse is a potential feed-forward controller of the original system; (3) Only minimal parameter adjustment is required; (4) Only minimum control effort is required.
5. If we could construct one somehow, it should be useful in theory and practice, at least, in the field of high-speed and high-precision motion control where I am interested in.
1、在结构与控制实践中,普遍存在非最小相位系统,出于控制的需要,我们往往要找到一个与之临近的最小相位系统。我们可以通过参数调整、传感器位置调整、并行补偿、串联补偿、输出重构等方式进行。
2、实践中似乎存在一个“临界”系统,比如调整传感器位置时,当传感器向作动器方向接近时,会有一个极限位置,小于此距离时我们会获得最小相位系统。
3、能否够构造一个“非最小相位系统的最近最小相位系统”的概念,就像“非线性系统的最近线性系统”的概念那样。
4、设想中,这样的“最近最小相位系统”应该①闭环下与原非最小相位系统一致或接近的稳态响应与低频段响应;②其逆是原系统的一个好用的前馈控制器;③仅需最小的参数调整获得;④仅需消耗最小的控制作用获得。
5、如果能有的话,这在理论与技术上应该很有用处,至少在我研究的高速高精运动控制上是这样。
Literature review shows that most roundabout capacity works use either only AM or PM peak for analysis. I have two sets of volume data: (1) AM peak and (2) PM peak. After filtering out the saturated condition from the two datasets, not many data points are left for capacity analysis. Thus I want to combine them to estimate analysis, but I am not sure if this approach works or not. Please advise.
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
bong
I have read in a article that a norm that defines the technique, the parameters and filters to use in the measurment of dental implants surface roughness was in development but I wasn,'t able to find it.
I've done an indepth literature serach on the subject, but at the moment the only document that comes close to the definition of these parameters that i was able to find is the guidelines published by "Wennberg et al" in 2000.
Hei everyone,
I ll start here a discussion for which I can't find any answer online. We are facing an issue with the water that we use in PCR and qPCR. The problem is that when we use 16S bacterial or universal primers, the background water contamination is very high, with no template controls typically emerging at around 24 cycles on qPCR. As a comparison, using archaeal 16S primers or any other functional gene would typically have the negative control emerge at 38/39 cycles on qPCR. 24 cycles is too low for some of our low biomass samples, so how can we decrease this background contamination from the water?
Here is how we prepare our PCR water:
- Start with milliQ type 1 water that has >18Mohm resistance.
- Filter at 0,2um.
- Autoclave. This is likely useless, as it will kill whatever remains, but not really impact DNA strands.
- Aliquot in sterile 1.5mL tubes.
- "Burn" under UV light for a while.
The main improvements I think could be to use 0,02uM filters, and to increase the UV exposition (strength and time). But does anyone has other suggestions?
As well, does this discussion make any sense? At this point it feels like a rather thorough protocol, and maybe the contamination rather comes from the polymerase kit/buffer or our tubes? What are your thoughts?
Finally, I can say that in the past we have managed to have negative controls on bacterial 16S qPCR emerge at 27 cycles... corresponding to around 10x less contamination. So it is possible...
Thanks for the help!
I would like to know how I can tell when fluorophores will or won't work when it comes to flow cytometry. I know some basics such as you can't use colors that are excited by the same laser and pass through the same filter. Recently, I did a flow experiment where I used PerCP-Cy5.5 and Brilliant Violet 711 in my same panel. I thought it would work but the spectral overlap was over 100% and I now realize that is probably due to them passing through the same filter on our facility's cytometer (even though they are excited by different lasers and detected by different detectors).
I also once used APC and Alexa Fluor 700 together and got a spectral overlap warning of over 100%. Unlike the previous example, these colors are excited by the same laser but pass through different filters and are detected by different detectors.
These situations leave me a bit confused as to how I can tell when fluorophores will work in my panel or not. In general, now I am trying to craft panels where colors pass through different filters and detectors regardless if they are excited by the same laser or not. And it seems like regardless of anything I do, I can't use more than one color excited by a 640 nm laser (i.e. APC, AF647, AF700, APC-Cy7 etc.) or beyond as they always seem unhappy together.
AA. I have an inquiry to you. I have filtered water, sediment and fish different parts.... Now microplastic are on filter paper.
Shall I send you filter paper as such for analysis of chemical composition through FTIR etc,,
Dear everyone
is there a special sintered metal as filter substrate (in DPF) used with high sulphur diesel fuel. I found an article " Solid nanoparticle and gaseous emissions of a diesel engine with a diesel particulate filter and use of a high-sulphur diesel fuel and a medium-sulphur diesel fuel" but unfortunately the researchers does not mention to the type of sintered metal?
I am currently developing a numerical model to observe the effect of bolt preload on ultrasonic signal propagation across a bolted interface. Since, bolt load and PZT patch modeling is only available in Dynamic implicit analysis, I applied the bolt load in a general static model and then imported the deformed geometry to model ultrasonic signal propagation in a dynamic explicit model.
However, in the transmitted signal, I am observing a dominant low-frequency vibration along with the ultrasonic signal. I was able to extract the actual signal by applying a bandpass filter around the signal frequency.
For the excitation of the signal, I used pressure at the patch area, and the transmitted signal was recorded with out-of-plane displacements.
Do you have any insights into why I am observing this low-frequency component? This phenomenon was not present when I performed a similar analysis on a single plate.
For the boundary condition, I had fixed the ends of the plate with ENCASTRE constraints.
Attached is the transmitted signal and its filtered version.
Dear Community, Can any one help me in my question as i am doing my research on feature selections.
Why the Ant colony optimization, Particle Swarm optimization and other evolutionary techniques are used for feature selection even if we have filter hybrid methods?
I want to assess filtering in working memory, most researchers have used orientations of colored rectangles (Vogel et al., 2005) but unfortunately we do not have this task in Iran, so I need to use another available test for the measurement.
I have used my amicon filter one time for concentrating down the TEV protease. I want to re-use the device again in future for the same protein. How to store? Buffer and storage temperature?