Science topic

Filtering - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Filtering, and find Filtering experts.
Questions related to Filtering
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
I want some good references on modeling the LCL filter in stationary frame in continuous time. (state space)
and if a MATLAB code is available that would be great.
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Why the αβ Frame?
The αβ frame, also known as the dq or synchronous reference frame, is often used in power electronics for analyzing three-phase AC systems. It simplifies calculations by transforming the three-phase sinusoidal waveforms into a two-dimensional equivalent in the rotating reference frame. This allows for easier control design and analysis.
Modeling the LCL Filter:
An LCL filter consists of an inductor (L), capacitor (C), and another inductor (L) connected in series between the converter and the grid. Here's how to model it in the αβ frame:
  1. Park's Transformation: This mathematical transformation converts the three-phase AC voltages and currents (a, b, c) into their equivalent in the αβ frame (vαβ, iαβ). This involves multiplying by appropriate sine and cosine functions synchronized with the grid frequency.
  2. Impedance Transformation: Once in the αβ frame, the LCL filter's impedances (ZL = jωL, ZC = 1/jωC) are transformed as well. The reactance of the inductors becomes dependent on the system angular frequency (ω).
  3. Circuit Representation: The transformed impedances are then represented in the circuit diagram within the αβ frame. This results in a simpler circuit with two inductors and a capacitor connected in series.
  4. State-Space Model: For control design purposes, the transformed LCL filter can be further represented in a state-space model. This model relates the state variables (e.g., inductor currents, capacitor voltage) to the input voltages and output currents.
Benefits of αβ Frame Modeling:
  • Simplified Analysis: The αβ frame allows for easier analysis of the LCL filter's behavior due to the two-dimensional representation.
  • Control Design: The transformed model aids in designing control algorithms for the converter by providing a more manageable system representation.
Challenges:
  • Park's Transformation Complexity: Park's Transformation requires knowledge of the grid frequency, which might need to be estimated or measured in real-time.
  • Non-Linear Effects: The αβ frame model might not capture all non-linear effects present in the actual LCL filter, such as core saturation in the inductors.
Resources:
Here are some resources that delve deeper into this topic:
References:
  • Analysis and Control of LCL-Type Grid-Connected Inverters (IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009): https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8804168This paper provides a detailed analysis of LCL filter modeling in the αβ frame, including the derivation of the state-space equations. It also discusses control design techniques for LCL-connected inverters.
  • Modeling and Control of Three-Phase Photovoltaic Systems with LCL Filters (IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2014): https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6894991/This paper focuses on modeling LCL filters in photovoltaic systems. It presents the state-space equations for the LCL filter in the αβ frame and discusses control strategies for grid integration.
  • Power Electronics for Renewable Energy Systems (Book by Muhammad H. Rashid): https://www.academia.edu/38989807/Power_Electronics_Circuits_Devices_and_Applications_By_Muhammad_H_Rashid (Chapter 7) This book offers a comprehensive explanation of power electronics for renewable energy systems. Chapter 7 covers the modeling and analysis of LCL filters, including state-space representation in the αβ frame.
  • % Define system parameters
  • L1 = 1e-3; % Inductance of L1 (in Henry)
  • L2 = 1e-3; % Inductance of L2 (in Henry)
  • C = 10e-6; % Capacitance (in Farad)
  • % Define state variables
  • x = [i_L1_alpha; i_L2_beta; v_C_alpha]; % State vector (inductor currents, capacitor voltage)
  • % Define system matrices
  • A = [0 -1/L1*1/C 0; 1/L2*1/C 0 -1/L2*sqrt(3)/C; 0 1/L2*sqrt(3)/C 0];
  • B = [1/L1 0; 0 1/L2; 0 0];
  • C = [1 0 0; 0 1 0]; % Output (e.g., inductor currents)
  • D = [0 0; 0 0];
  • % Display state-space matrices
  • disp('State matrix (A):')
  • disp(A)
  • disp('Input matrix (B):')
  • disp(B)
  • disp('Output matrix (C):')
  • disp(C)
  • disp('Feedforward matrix (D):')
  • disp(D)
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Dears,
I'm using the UV/vis method to determine water-soluble chrome in cement as follows:
I take particulate mass from dichromate to make a stock solution then take various volumes of aliquots into a 50 ml volumetric flask to set up a calibration curve.
for measuring the sample, I take a 25 g sample and 25 ml of water then filter and take 5 ml of filtrate into a 50 ml volumetric flask and dilute to mark with water after adding a color indicator.
my inquiry why don't I consider 50 ml dilution of aliquoted sample in the calculation equation ? and if I deviate from the method and make a dilution of the aliquoted sample 100 ml instead of 50 ml what does the formal calculation equation become?
#analytical Chemistry
Relevant answer
- Why don't I consider 50 ml dilution of aliquoted sample in the calculation equation ?
Because you are diluting both, sample and standard, to the same final volume of 50 mL.
If you decide to dilute your sample to 100 mL instead of 50 mL, this means that the concentration value that you will get from the calibration curve must be multiplied by a factor of 2 (because the sample is now twice more diluted than the standards).
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
I am working on EEG classification problem and have collected my own data set ,at first step I applied filters and ICA than decomposed it by applying db3 at level 6 ,after trying all kind of known feature(Non Statistical i.e. Hjorth features, Entropy, band Power and Statistical features mean, median, variance ,skewness ,std_deviation ) accuracy with SVM classifier with 10-K fold method has stuck at 63% ,where as when i fed the chunk of cleaned and pruned data to SVM the accuracy of different chunks is 80% .what should i report in paper please guide.
Relevant answer
Answer
In your paper, u should comprehensively report both the traditional feature extraction approach and ur novel method of directly using cleaned and pruned EEG data with the SVM classifier. Here's what to include:
  1. Methodology: Clearly describe the preprocessing steps (filtering, ICA, etc.), and detail how the SVM was applied with and without traditional feature extraction
  2. Results: Present the classification accuracies of both approaches. Highlight the improvement observed when bypassing the feature extraction
  3. Discussion: Offer insights into why the direct approach might be yielding better results, such as the preservation of critical data features that are possibly lost during feature extraction
  4. Validation: Include details of the validation techniques used (like cross-validation) to ensure the results are robust and not merely due to overfitting
  5. Conclusion: Suggest why the direct use of cleaned data could be beneficial, based on your findings and validations.
This structure will help underline the efficacy and reliability of your approach providing valuable insights into EEG data classification methodologies...
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Hi guys,
I was wondering if it is okay to filter complete StemFlex medium or if I'll lose important factors!
Many thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Namaste Eleonora Giagnorio: You are welcome. It seems you have a life sciences question but the "magic" of software automation has treated filtering to be an engineering issue and sent it to a former engineer!
I will reply as an engineer. Filtering always diminishes some energy components. If you can afford doing some trials, please try some filtering options and see what actually happens while you await more specific answers.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Hi, I have transfected my HEK293 cells with pcDNA3.1_plasmid of interest with EGFP by using lipotransfection method. Post transfection 48h the egfp expression looks good with more than 50% transfection rate. Started G418 selection (DMEM+10% FBS+ 2mg/mL G418). Post transfection 48h, the cells transfer from 24wp to 12wp to create space for G418 medium to get to non-transfected cells. Medium replacement done daily, and after a week, fresh selective medium is prepared. Massive cell death observed after 2 days of G418 selection.
Day 7, 95% of non transfected cell die. Colonies/ egfp rounded cell clump together can be observed and a lot of resistant cells survived but did not attached under the G418 selective stress.
Day 8, the selective medium reduce to 1mg/mL and Day 10 reduce to 500ug/mL and day 12 reduce to 250ug/mL hoping that the resistant cells will attach and starting to expand.
Unfortunately, the non transfected cells starting to grow rapidly and the cells with EGFP did not grow so much. Any comments and thoughts are welcome. The reason I use 2mg/mL from to start becuase I have done 1mg/mL to kill the HEK293 but it wasn’t effective. The active G418 percentage is 80.9% and I have reconstituted G418 with 100mM HEPES buffer And filtered.
I have read about for the survival cells to expand it might take a long time under the selective pressure. When is the right time to reduce the antibiotic?
the attached image is Day 10 under G418 selection. Should I be more patient and keep the G418 concentration high and wait for the colonies to attach and expand?
Relevant answer
Answer
Sabine Strehl thank you for answering! Under G418 selection pressure, the resistant cells did not die but not exert their typical morphology even after 10 days. The non resistant cells die 99% but not completely, as I reduce the antibiotic level the non resistant cells overgrowth than the resistant cells that express EGFP and slowly my resistant cells reduce and die off and non resistant cells overgrowth. I use medium with G418 for 7 days then prepare a fresh one, but on 7th day of the medium, the antibiotic seems wear off the potency after a few water bath thaw.
I will repeat the transfection and selection process. Thank you for your suggestion.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
I got some bands of my compound in TLC. I want to get those compounds for further analysis means for quantification purpose. After scratching the band I have mixed with methanol in a conical flask and mixed throughly with magnetic stirrer for 15 mins. After this i want to filter this solvent. My question is for this filtration which filter paper I will prefer, wheather I will go for whatman 40 or 42 grade or something else.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Subhrakanta Jena,
The pore size of the filter paper can be compared with the diameter of silica, and the one with a smaller pore size than the diameter of silica can be selected for filtration.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
After cleaning your biochar, do you use filtration using GF/F filter or do you use syringe to extract the filtrate and put it on cuvette and subject it to UV-VIS?
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
You need to use whatever pore size/material that gives you clear solutions.
You may find that whatever colloids are present will pass different filter sizes to a variable degree. Under such circumstances, I suggest you be more specific in your description.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
For Electric conductivity (EC), I have taken 10 g of soil in 25 ml of water and directly measured it without filtering the suspension. Is this correct ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Shairq Irtiqa ! It is possible to use the additive method. Measure the conductivity of the soil, and then add the precisely measured amount of water and measure again.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
5 answers
Hi all,
I am doing CRISPR on Hek293T cells. After FACS, the one cell wells do not survive/grow only the wells were 50/100 cells were plated. Any tips to improve the survival rate for the one cell cultures? I use DMEM high glucose with 10 % FBS. The cells are 11-15 µm, so I can not use a 22 µm filter to filter medium from other cells.
Thanks a lot.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Esteemed Colleague,
Greetings. I hope this message finds you well and thriving in your research endeavors. Your inquiry regarding the cultivation of HEK293T cells following single-cell sorting is of paramount importance for ensuring the success of your experiments. Single-cell sorting and subsequent culture of such cells require meticulous care to ensure viability and promote growth. Below, I provide a detailed guide designed to optimize the conditions for growing HEK293T cells after single-cell sorting.
1. Preparation Before Sorting
  • Cell Condition: Ensure that the HEK293T cells are in optimal condition prior to sorting. This means cells should be healthy, actively growing, and at a low passage number to ensure the best viability and performance post-sorting.
  • Media Preparation: Use fresh, complete growth medium tailored for HEK293T cells, typically DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Pre-warm the medium to 37°C to promote immediate cell recovery.
2. Sorting Parameters
  • Gentle Conditions: Opt for the gentlest sorting parameters possible to preserve cell viability. High pressures and narrow nozzles can damage cells.
  • Single-Cell Purity: Adjust the sorter for maximum purity to ensure that sorted droplets contain a single cell. This may require calibrating the instrument before sorting.
3. Post-Sorting Culture
  • Immediate Transfer: Quickly transfer sorted cells into pre-warmed medium to minimize stress and temperature shock.
  • Low Attachment Plates: Consider using plates treated for low attachment or coated with poly-D-lysine to prevent cells from attaching too rapidly, which can cause stress in some sorted cells.
  • High-Humidity Incubation: Culture the sorted cells in a high-humidity incubator set to 37°C with 5% CO2. This environment helps prevent evaporation and maintains stable conditions conducive to cell recovery and growth.
4. Optimal Culture Conditions
  • Reduced Serum Conditions Initially: Some protocols suggest using media with reduced serum (around 5% FBS) immediately after sorting to minimize stress on the cells. After 24-48 hours, when cells have attached and show signs of recovery, the medium can be switched back to the standard 10% FBS formulation.
  • Use of Rock Inhibitor: Including a Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor in the culture medium immediately post-sorting can enhance survival of single cells by preventing apoptosis.
  • Monitoring and Subculturing: Carefully monitor cell growth and morphology. When cells reach an appropriate density, typically within 7-14 days post-sorting, they can be gently trypsinized and expanded under normal culture conditions.
5. Troubleshooting
  • Low Viability: If viability is low post-sorting, consider optimizing the sorting parameters, the composition of the sorting buffer, and the immediate post-sort recovery conditions.
  • Slow Growth: Single cells, especially after sorting, may take longer to divide and establish a colony. Patience is key, but if growth is exceptionally slow, verify the incubator settings and the freshness and composition of the media and supplements.
Adhering to these detailed tips and maintaining a meticulous approach to the post-sorting care of HEK293T cells will significantly enhance the likelihood of successful culture from single-cell sorts. It is crucial to adapt these guidelines as necessary to fit the specific requirements of your experimental setup and the unique characteristics of your cell line.
Should you have any further questions or require additional insights into cell culture techniques, please do not hesitate to reach out. I am here to support your scientific exploration and contribute to the advancement of your research.
Warm regards.
Perhaps this protocol list can give us more information to help solve the problem.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
In XRD, I think there is a significant relationship between the target and the filter here, and the target has one more proton than the filter, is this true or false? What is the reason in both cases?
Relevant answer
Answer
the reason for that is found in the energy distribution of the electron energy levels of the atoms, which depends on the atomic number (i.e.the number of protons in the nucleus).
For the emission energies (K-alpha in the XRD case) of the x-ray targets please have a look at:
(please click on "Table 1-2 (pdf format)" there..
For the energy leves (K-edges; K 1s column) in the case of XRD filters, please have a look at :
(please click on "PDF version of this table") there...
Comparing the K-alpha lines energies and the filter K-edge energies according to your blue coloured table, you can confirm the relative shift of 1 atomic numbers between target material and filter material.
Best regards
G.M.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
4 answers
I am using a fluorescence microscope with DAPI filter, here are the specifications:
Excitation wavelength: 360/40 nm
Emission wavelength: 460/50 nm
Dichroic mirror wavelength: 400 nm
I want to label my cells with cyan fluorescent protein. I just want to know if our DAPI filter can detect the CFP. Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I used to prepare DMEM-powdered media for the cell culture use. The last step of media preparation is media filtration using 0.2um filters. Meanwhile, in case of 0.2um filters shortage, is it possible to alternatively prepare a sterile media for the cell culture without using 0.2um filters. Like to use 0.45um filters and then autoclave the media to ensure the sterile condition of the prepared media?
Relevant answer
Answer
You may autoclave culture media prepared from powder (I would not suggest autoclaving), but sterile filtration through 0.2um or 0.22um filter is recommended, particularly if serum or other supplements are to be added before use.
The use of 0.45-micron filter to filter sterilize the culture media is not advisable because bacteria are still capable of passing through a 0.45-micron filter in large quantity. The 0.45-micron filter is typically used for general filtration and particle removal while 0.2/0.22um filter is most used for solution sterilization (bacteria removal).
So, make use of 0.22um filter to filter sterilize your culture media in order to obtain good results.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Pls, give me answer and suggestion.
Relevant answer
Answer
My recipe relates to Photoshop technologies.
To enhance the contrast of cracks, it is necessary to subtract its blurred copy from the original image. Then enhance the contrast of the resulting difference image.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
I've managed to isolate the phage for Clostridium perfringens, but whenever I tried to filter it even with the biggest pore size of 0.45 μm the phage didn't manage to pass through. I also have done the filtration using nylon-type filter and PES-type filter. Both filters yield negative results. Anyone found a similar problem and how do I solve this particular problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
What type of sample are you filtering? If it's a straight lysate there will be a lot of debris that will be difficult to filter out and will hold up the filter potentially blocking your phage from passing through. You will need to determine a method for clearing the lysate first and then proceed with filtering. Centrifugation usually works to clear a lysate enough for filtration.
If this isn't your problem then I suggest scraping a sample off the surface of the filter when filled with a bit of buffer and trying to use that to infect bacteria to determine if all your phage are adhering to the filter.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
After formulation, can SBF be sterilized in the autoclaved without damaging the components? Or should it be sterile-filtered?
Relevant answer
Answer
Autoclaving may cause some water evaporation resulting in different salt concentrations. Filtering is probably a better choice.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Many studies and industries are known to filter coal- syngas by means of assemblies of candle filters. Is it possible to/ Do any systems exist to instead use huge ceramic monolithic devices (similar to DPF) for removal of particulate matter from syngas?
Relevant answer
Answer
Okay so there are some devices that come close to a DPF. But I did not find an application of an exact massive DPF device downstream of a coal gasifier for particulate removal.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
I am trying to extract microplastics from water samples and follow the standard method. As per the standard method after digestion and density separation, the final step is filtration with glass fiber filter paper and then analysis.
But my query is in freshwater samples after extraction we are getting a few very small microplastic particles that get stuck to the membrane only after filtration and it is very difficult to get a residue for FTIR analysis.
If we give filter paper as it is for ATR- FTIR analysis then how it is assumed that all particles spread over filter paper will be detected?
As in ATR FTIR point of contact of the beam is at one point only.
So can anybody suggest how to extract microplastic particles that are stuck on glass filter paper to get particles for any analysis?
Relevant answer
Answer
After filtration you have to observe the filter paper under a stereo-microscope (for better identification) and confirm the particles remain are plastics via hot-needle test. Once confirmed if the particles are big enough to extract from the filter paper, you can do so using metal tweezers and collect separately for FTIR analysis. But if the particles are very small and non-extractable you can go for micro-FTIR spectroscopy for polymer identification.
Hope this helps.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
hi,
I need a practical calculation and design for designing passive harmonic filter inductors.
and the information about core sizing and considerations for 3-phase system.
Relevant answer
Answer
Two books I found very good for inductor/transformer design and core selections are written by C. W. Mclyman:
1. Mclyman, C. W. M. T. (2004). Transformer and Inductor Design Handbook, (Third Edition) Marcel Dekker, Inc, 5(3)-5(20)
2. T. Mclyman, C. W. (1997). Magnetic Core Selection for Transformers and Inductors A User’s Guide to Practice and Specification (Second Edition). Taylor & Francis Group, 69, 93.
3. In my M.S thesis project, I worked on transformer design, and the thesis book titled, "Design, Analysis, and Simulation of an Isolated High Voltage DC Power Supply Based on Modular Converter and Cockcroft-Walton Voltage Multiplier Topology" is available in research gate. Although it is about transformer, many calculation shown on the book are also applicable for inductor design. Step by Step calculation for magnetic design is given there.
4. Sometimes, you will find application note, data sheet, core selection chart from the website of the magnetic core manufacture like FERROXCUBE, TDK. Those documents may also become helpful.
Hope these resources/ references will help. Best of luck.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
6 answers
Does anyone work with expression in S2 cells? How efficient is the transfection using Lipofectamine 2000? Everytime I try to transfect using CaCl2 I get a cloudy media, and it seems that the culture is infected with a small bacteria, even filtrating all reagents with a 0.1 filter.
Relevant answer
Answer
The S2 kit comes with reagent for CaCl2 transfection. However, I used Cellfectin2 to transfect S2 cells and the efficiency is very high.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
9 answers
Hello everyone,
We have a water treatment unit where the input water is TAP WATER. Tap water pass throw three steps in this order:
Softner ==> Filters (cotton filter+charcoal filter) ==> Reverse Osmosis
We are using water after reverse osmosis.
My question is what are the conductivity, pH and hardness limit and acceptable values of the tap water, water after softner, water after softner+filters and water after the three steps.
If you could provide references and/or standard I will be very grateful.
Thank you for your precious time.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Virendra
Thank you for your clarifications.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I want it to filter Fetal Heart Beat Sound obtained from the Piezoelectric sensor
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
SRR no. input filtered denoisedF denoisedR merged Nonchim % drop
SRR15372855 210711 186522 175583 176162 116563 36509 83%
SRR15372856 209697 183184 173837 174328 127588 38205 82%
SRR15372857 151093 137752 133022 133438 107083 25667 83%
SRR15372858 186504 164448 158409 159015 120511 28185 85%
SRR15372859 152065 139938 132967 133593 96672 34233 77%
SRR15372860 156315 142035 134111 135300 94163 32878 79%
Relevant answer
Answer
It's not standard. If you didn't resolve it yet, try using the 'pseudo' option in dada2.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
in EEG preprocessing filtering through window technique which filter is best what is the sampling frquency pass band frequency
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
For CHB-MIT scalp EEG data, start with a few files (e.g., 5-10) for initial feature extraction and classification in MATLAB. Adjust based on results and computational resources.
Hope this helps.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
I need this medium for cultivation of cervical epithelial cells. It is recommended to use EGF at a concentration of 0,01 ng/ml. In my vial I have 2,5 µg with a concentration of 0,0378 µg/µl (noted by manufacturer). This would mean for 0,01 ng/ml in 500 ml of medium I need to take 1,32 µl of the EGF vial. This seems very few. Especially because I read, that the medium - once supplemented - is stable only for two weeks.
How long do you use supplemented K-SFM?
Do you prepare less than 500 ml medium?
Do you sterile filter the BPE?
Do you have any other tipps?
Thank you very much in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
I used the BPE and EGF provided by Thermo to add to Keratinocyte SFM.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Immigration: Filter @Borders
Refugee: Establish @Nation
Voluntary: Move @USA #States
Bio-Economic Ecology
Relevant answer
Answer
The integration of smart city development and social security reform has become a critical aspect in the quest for sustainable and efficient city planning. With the pressing challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and increasing population growth, smart cities have emerged as a potential solution. Furthermore, the sustainability of social security systems has been a topic of debate, given the aging populations and declining birth rates in many countries. Therefore, it is imperative to explore the potential relationship between smart city migration and social security reform. This can provide a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and challenges of integrating these two critical areas, as well as the potential implications of urban migration on social security programs. By examining this intersection, policymakers can make informed decisions that not only advance the goals of each respective field but also contribute to the overall well-being of society. In addition, this research can lead to innovative solutions that address the challenges facing smart cities and social security programs, making it crucial to continue exploring and studying this intersection.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I have 0.2% Chitosan solution dissolved in 1% acetic acid and after filteration using 0.2 µm filter paper, small white particles perciptated I do not what these particles are. This the first time for me to encounter such problem. Do you have any idea about this?
Relevant answer
These particles may be chitin residues that were not deacetylated enough during processing to obtain chitosan. Furthermore, deacetylation includes filtration steps, which may result in cellulose residues from the filter paper if it is scraped to remove the chitosan.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
I am looking for a new source for filters for mosquito mouth aspirators similar to the attached image. Any suggestions much appreciated
Relevant answer
Answer
@Lukas Lischer unfortunately I have not found a good substitute
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
5 answers
Is it correct to filter the extracts we obtain with Whatman filter paper and use them directly in experiments to investigate the bioactivity of phytochemical substances? Or is it correct to first centrifuge the extracts we obtain, then filter the supernatant and use them in experiments?
Relevant answer
Answer
You should first carry out a rough clarification of the extract by simply decanting, followed by a filtration step by using a six to seven layered muslin cloth. Then you may include a centrifugation step which may be required if the powder is too fine to be filtered.
I have attached a book below which may be helpful.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Have you any data about the operating costs of CERAMIC membranes over for example 50 years? what about sand filter and polymeric membranes? The use of all of them is after coagulation, but for sand filter we have clarifier. For MF CERAMIC membranes (or polymeric membranes), the filter will act as clarifier. Any data for any types of CERAMIC membranes (MF, UF, ...) can be useful.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Kaushik
Thank you for your contribution. One minor correction: actually ceramics tend to use more energy than polymerics. Ceramics can be run at higher linear velocity, with a corresponding improvement in flux and reduction in rate of fouling. However, the downside is higher pumping cost, hence higher energy.
Regards
Alan
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
4 answers
I am interested in utilizing a screw-press to effectively dewater a slurry. Allow me to provide you with the specifications of the slurry in question:
- Flow: The slurry has a flow rate of 50 m3/h. - Particle Size: The D80 value is 50 micrometers. - Composition: The slurry consists of 1% Cu, 8% Hematite Iron, approximately 90% non-mineral clay soil, and 1% other elements. - Solid to Water Ratio: The solid to water ratio is 30%. - Solid to Slurry Ratio: The solid to slurry ratio is approximately 24%.
My inquiry pertains to the suitability and standards associated with employing a screw press for filtering and dewatering this particular slurry. Additionally, I am seeking recommendations on where I can access a catalog or book that provides research data on this equipment.
Thank you for your assistance.
Best regards,
Hamid
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Dave,
I hope you are doing well.
Thank you for your kind response. I am delighted to learn more about the Somerset system. Also, I would like to share additional information with you.
In my previous role as the technical manager of a cathode copper company in Iran, I was the commissioning manager and optimizer of the processing of the cathode copper plant. During this time, I observed that all companies utilized the filter press for dewatering the slurry in the Leaching unit. However, I found that this method was manual and operated at a low speed.
Given the high value of the PLS solvent obtained from leaching dewatering, companies require a more efficient and effective method to achieve a drier cake.
1. I have explored alternative methods, such as the centrifuge peeler, but found it to be a batch process rather than continuous.
2. Additionally, the maintenance and manufacturing costs associated with the centrifuge decanter seem prohibitively expensive. Furthermore, the quality of dewatering achieved with this method seems subpar. The equipment must be from stainless steel 316 due to acid sulfuric inside PLS, and the normal rotational speed of the drum at 3000rpm leads to rapid and hazardous corrosion.
3. While the vacuum drum filter appears to be a viable option, it is also quite expensive as it requires vacuum pumps, separators, and a mechanism agitator.
4. Similarly, the vacuum belt filter is a costly solution.
Considering these challenges, I have been contemplating the use of a screw press. This method offers the advantages of being small in size, continuous, and cost-effective. It appears to be too simplistic in terms of maintenance and manufacturing requirements.
I look forward to discussing this matter further and exploring potential solutions with you.
\Best regards,
\Hamid
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
6 answers
Hello All
We using Grid connecetd Inverter using LCL Filter, we are unble damp low fréquences (like 200 hz to 350 hz)
Can you please suggest How to attenuates low frequencies for grid current ?
LCL filter values fixed, any other solution to attenuates low frequinces for control point view ?
Please find the attached FFT analysais PNG file for your reference.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for suggestion @ Paulo Evald
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Hello,
I am currently doing a lab for an analytical lab where I am given beeswax mixed with brass, and trying to separate the copper and zinc from the brass in order to find out their amounts. How would I separate the wax and brass without compromising the quantity/quality of the brass? I was thinking an organic solvent like hexane or acetone, and filtering it out with a filter. Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Beeswax is a complex ester, IIRC, so I'd recommend hot MEK (butanone) as a solvent to remove the wax from the brass.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I am trying to get an insight of the above mentioned research paper, specially about the filtering process used to remove grid artifacts. However, I find it difficult to understand it correctly.
I would be much grateful if anyone could help me to clarify a few questions that I have.
My questions are as follows:
1) what are the pixel values of the Mean filter they used? they mention about using an improved Mean filter, but what is the improvement?
2) do they apply the Mean filter in the whole patch image (seems like it), or only in the grid signal region (characteristic peak range)?
3) what do they mean by (u1,v1) being Fmax value? does that mean that the center pixel of the Mean filter is replaced by this max value?
Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
This is a fourier domain filtering technique. Note the area that is zeroed out in the IFFT is the frequency component of that noise frequency. This technique is used in medical imaging for mamo, ct, and mri.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Hello everyone,
I have a list of InChI strings in .csv by quetying pubchem using pubchempy. Alot of the returns are isotopes and multi-component compounds such as NaCl and methane-water.
Currently, I'm filtering out such compounds by having my script find "/i" for isotopes and
" , " (basically finding commas) in the InChI strings and filtering out compounds that have those.
Is there anything else you can suggest to make it better?
Relevant answer
Answer
Follow these suggestions:
1. Remove isotopes using regular expressions: Instead of searching for "/i" in the InChI strings, you can use regular expressions to identify and remove isotopes. Regular expressions provide more flexibility in pattern matching. For example, you can use the following regular expression pattern to remove isotopes:
````python
import re
inchi_string = "InChI=1S/H2O/h1H2/i/hD2"
inchi_without_isotopes = re.sub(r"/[iI]", "", inchi_string)
```
The `re.sub()` function replaces all occurrences of the pattern `/[iI]` (which matches "/i" or "/I") with an empty string.
2. Handle multi-component compounds: To filter out multi-component compounds like NaCl and methane-water, you can search for the presence of a comma (",") in the InChI strings as you are currently doing. However, keep in mind that this approach may not be foolproof since some legitimate InChI strings may contain commas. For example, an InChI string for a complex organic molecule might include commas to separate different parts of the molecular structure.
To enhance the accuracy of filtering multi-component compounds, you could consider using additional criteria. For example, you can check if the InChI string contains specific sub-strings indicating common solvents or salts used in the context of your research. If such sub-strings are present, you can exclude those compounds from your analysis.
3. Validate the filtered compounds: After applying your filtering criteria, it's a good practice to validate the remaining compounds to ensure that they meet your requirements. You can use additional tools or libraries to perform sanity checks on the filtered compounds or cross-reference the results with trusted databases or chemical references.
4. Consider using PubChem annotations: PubChem provides annotations for various properties of compounds, including isotopes and compound type information. Instead of solely relying on the InChI strings, you can leverage PubChem annotations to filter out specific compound types or isotopes. The PubChemPy library you mentioned, which you are using to query PubChem, may provide methods to access these annotations.
Hope it helps:credit AI
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
During storage of Ethanol (USP Grage) after filtration through 5-micron filter membrane. Particulate matter observed during storage. For that, we need to investigate the reason. Is any science behind for these particles' generation.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear friend Deep Chand Agrawal
Certainly, let's delve into the potential reasons for the appearance of particulate matter in stored ethanol (USP Grade) after filtration through a 5-micron filter membrane.
1. **Contamination during Filtration:** Despite the use of a 5-micron filter membrane, there could be instances of filter failure or compromise, allowing larger particles to pass through. Ensuring the integrity of the filtration system and periodic checks on filter performance is crucial.
2. **Residual Particles in the Ethanol:** Ethanol, even if of USP Grade, might contain impurities or particles from the manufacturing process. These particles could settle over time, leading to their observation during storage.
3. **Environmental Contamination:** Particulate matter could be introduced during the storage process. This might occur through airborne particles, dust, or contaminants in the storage environment.
4. **Reaction Products:** Ethanol may react with certain materials, equipment, or residues in the storage container. These reactions could produce by-products that manifest as particulate matter.
5. **Microbial Growth:** Ethanol is susceptible to microbial contamination. Microorganisms or their by-products could contribute to the observed particulate matter. Ensure that storage conditions prevent microbial growth.
6. **Degradation of Container Material:** The container material might degrade over time, contributing to particulate matter. This is especially relevant if the container is not compatible with ethanol.
7. **Temperature Fluctuations:** Ethanol can dissolve certain materials. Temperature fluctuations may lead to dissolution and subsequent precipitation of these materials, causing particulate matter.
8. **Chemical Reactions:** Ethanol may undergo chemical reactions over time, forming compounds that manifest as particulate matter. This is particularly true if the ethanol is exposed to light or air.
Investigating the source of particulate matter may involve examining the filtration system, analyzing the ethanol for impurities, and evaluating storage conditions. Regular checks, adherence to recommended storage practices, and using appropriate materials and equipment can help mitigate particulate matter issues in stored ethanol.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
8 answers
Highlights:
Erbium substitution in Ba2Co2Fe28-xO46 yields optimal magnetic behavior at x = 0.12 .
XRD analysis shows distinct X and W phases in Er-substituted hexaferrites which indicates structural modifications.
Low dielectric loss tangent suggests potential applications in filters and magnetic technology which includes antennas and inductors.
Properties unveiled
Enhanced magnetization at x = 0.12 with Erbium substitution.
Identification of X and W phases via XRD in Er-substituted hexaferrites.
Potential for technological applications due to low dielectric loss, beneficial for filters and magnetic devices.
Current Applications
Magnetic Devices: Hexaferrites with optimized properties find use in antennas, multilayer inductors, and resonators due to their tailored magnetic behavior.
Filter Technology: Low dielectric loss tangent makes them promising for filter applications, especially in telecommunications and electronic devices.
Microwave Absorbers: Potential utilization in absorbing microwave frequencies, particularly in technologies requiring absorption of electromagnetic waves
Future application
Advanced Electronics: Potential integration into next-gen electronic devices for improved performance leveraging their tailored magnetic and dielectric properties.
Sensor Technology: Utilization in sensitive sensors for diverse industries benefitting from their magnetic characteristics and potential for tuning sensitivity.
Emerging Energy Technologies: Exploration in energy-related applications such as energy harvesting or storage, leveraging their unique magnetic and dielectric behaviors for innovative solutions.
#Hexaferrites #Erbium #XRD #Magnetization
Relevant answer
Answer
nice work
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
For lossless low-frequency applications, the study investigates the structural, thermal, magnetic, surface morphology, Raman spectroscopic, and dielectric properties of Cu-Cr co-substituted M-type barium hexaferrites.
The study focuses on the extraction of fresh mentha leaves from a local vegetable market in Ahmedabad, India. The leaves were cleansed, dried, and finely crushed before being mixed with distilled water. The resulting extract was then filtered using Whatman 125mm filter paper. The Fourier Transform Infrared spectra of BaCuxCrxFe12–2xO19 hexaferrites were analyzed using a simple heat treatment method. The samples showed two vibrational bands within the 400–650 cm−1 wavenumber, which correspond to the stretching vibrations of Fe-O. The absorption band (ν1-mode) signified the tetrahedral group, while the other band (ν2-mode) signified the ferrite system's distinctive bands. The FT-IR spectra showed two absorption bands, and XRD investigation revealed the formation of the M-phase along with BaFe2O4.
FESEM (Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy): Used to visualize the hexagonal shape of the substituted samples.
Raman Spectroscopy: Applied to analyze the successful replacement of Cu and Cr ions in place of Fe ions.
#LowFrequencyApplications #XRDanalysis #GreenSynthesis #Research #HexaFerriteSynthesis
Relevant answer
Answer
Nice work 👍
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
Can clouds reflect incoming radiation and how much solar radiation is filtered by clouds?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr Murtadha Shukur thank you for your contribution to the discussion
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Hello,
I have designed a composite band pass filter, BPF (LPF+HPF) using short and open stubs. I need to do mathematical analysis for this design using even/odd analysis and also ABCD parameters ...Can someone help me in this or refer a paper which has already done such analysis for similar kind of design.
Thanking in advance!!!
Best Regards
Nitin
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Prof. Murtadha,
Thank you so much for your kind reply and guidance. I got some idea about it but since i am completely new to it, i will be thankful, if you can suggest some specific even/odd mathematical analysis as per my design of composite BPF using stubs. also if possible some light on ABCD or coupling matrix analysis....Thanking you in advance!
Best Regards
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
6 answers
I am working with emotiv EPOC headset. I captured 12 minutes continuous eeg data. In which 40 seconds is baseline data and the remaining eeg data is the data related to participants activities. I should mention that during the data collection i did not define any event.
To do data analysis, I am using "eeglab". When I import eeg data inside of eeglab it does not show me any events which is natural because I did not define any events. Even inside of "edf" file that EmotivPRO give to me there is not any columns for event.
But, after doing the following steps it shows me 23 events.
1- Remove baseline
2- Filter data (using FIR)
3- Automatic channel rejection
4- Automatic continuous rejection
5- Run ICA
Now, my problem is that if I can trust this data pre-processing or not?
When I reviewed the references for eeg data pre_processing the steps are as following:
1- Import event info
2- Re-referencing (if it is necessary)
3- Filter the data (High pass filter)
4- Remove bad channels
5- Run ICA
Relevant answer
Answer
Could you send me this toolbox?
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
Hi, we have developed a method to generate mice organoids from brain tumors and I would like to use them for drug testing, however the organoids in culture vary greatly in size which would be a factor in analyzing the drugs effects. I would like to filter the organoids by size to normalize it in my experimental groups but I haven't found cell mesh strainers or filters with a filter size that would work (200-400um diameter).
I could try this ones (Pierce™ Tissue Strainers, 250 µm, 2.5 mL: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/87791?SID=srch-srp-87791#/87791?SID=srch-srp-87791), but I would like to know if there is any method that could give me a better range.
Thank you very much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Pluriselect's pluristrainers are the way to go. They have a lot of different sizes ranging from a few microns to 1mm.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I'm sure I calculated the values correctly for an FIR Filter (In Excel - highlighted in yellow on attached) but when using the MATLAB Filter Designer, the Impulse Response seems off.
Attempt in MATLAB was for an Equiripple Low Pass FIR with an order of 17 so n= -8...0...8
Further into my work I experiment with the Hanning Window, which calculates and plots correctly so no idea what I'm doing wrong.
Any pointers on this are gratefully received.
Relevant answer
Answer
I wrote this document to help people understand the basics of digital filter design.
You may find it usefu.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Filter
Relevant answer
Answer
The most common filter used for drip irrigation systems is the disc filter or ring filter. Disc filters are composed of a series of stacked rings or discs that, when compressed, form a filtering mesh. Filtration takes place as the water flows through the grooves formed by the rings, retaining the solid particles on their surface. Disc filters are available in different filtration grades, ranging from 20 to 200 microns. For irrigation, 130 micron filtration is typically used.
Disc filters are effective at removing a wide range of solid particles, including sand, silt, algae, and other debris. They are also relatively inexpensive and easy to maintain. However, they can be plugged by organic matter, such as leaves and grass clippings, so it is important to keep the irrigation system clean.
Other types of filters that can be used for drip irrigation systems include:
  • Screen filters: Screen filters are the simplest and least expensive type of filter. They consist of a mesh screen that traps solid particles as the water flows through it. Screen filters are effective at removing large particles, such as sand and gravel, but they are not as effective at removing smaller particles, such as silt and algae.
  • Media filters: Media filters use a granular material, such as sand or gravel, to trap solid particles. Media filters are more effective than screen filters at removing small particles, but they are also more expensive and require more maintenance.
  • Centrifugal filters: Centrifugal filters use centrifugal force to separate solid particles from the water. Centrifugal filters are very effective at removing large particles, but they are also more expensive and require more maintenance than other types of filters.
The type of filter that is best for a particular drip irrigation system will depend on the quality of the water source and the desired level of filtration. If the water source is high in sediment or other debris, then a disc filter or media filter is recommended. If the water source is relatively clean, then a screen filter may be sufficient.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I have to run suspended sediment concentration test on 500 ml river water samples. I am using Pall membrane filter papers with 47 mm dia and 0.45-micron pore size. However, some samples take up to an hour to filter in the vacuum filtration setup. Is this very common? Should I go for a higher pore size ~ 1 -micron?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your response, Tabassum. It is helpful to know that the filtration time that my samples are taking is not uncommon.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Filtration of MCP
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Mr. Lassaad,
I am currently facing the same problem with the filtration of pectin extracted from orange peel. I was wondering if you could help me by answering a few questions.
Firstly, I noticed that you chose a 0.2 µm filter. I was wondering if you could explain why you chose this particular filter? I have found that it can be difficult to filter viscous pectin even with pressure, so I was curious to know if you had any advice for this process.
Secondly, I was wondering if you knew of any other filters or methods that could be used for pectin filtration? I am open to any suggestions that you may have.
Thank you.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
I have looked up online and read about it, but I'd appreciate a simpler definition. Thank you :)
Relevant answer
Answer
A Savitzky-Golay (SG) filter is a digital filter that can be used to smooth data and remove noise. It works by fitting a low-degree polynomial to a window of adjacent data points and then replacing the center data point with the fitted value. The window size is determined by the order of the polynomial and the desired cutoff frequency of the filter.
Advantages of Savitzky-Golay filters:
  • They have a flatter frequency response than other smoothing filters, such as moving averages. This means that they preserve more of the signal while suppressing noise.
  • They can be used to calculate derivatives of data without introducing significant distortion.
  • They are relatively easy to implement and can be used with a variety of programming languages and software packages.
Disadvantages of Savitzky-Golay filters:
  • They can be computationally expensive, especially for high-order polynomials and long data sets.
  • They can be sensitive to the choice of polynomial order and window size.
How to use a Savitzky-Golay filter to remove noise from your signal:
  1. Choose the order of the polynomial and window size for your filter. The order of the polynomial should be at least twice the frequency of the noise that you want to remove. The window size should be large enough to capture the noise, but small enough to preserve the signal.
  2. Implement the filter in your chosen programming language or software package.
  3. Apply the filter to your data.
Is a Savitzky-Golay filter better than adjacent averaging?
In general, Savitzky-Golay filters are better at removing noise while preserving the signal than adjacent averaging. However, they are also more computationally expensive.
Adjacent averaging is a simple and efficient way to smooth data. It works by replacing each data point with the average of itself and its neighbors. However, adjacent averaging can also distort the signal, especially for high-frequency signals.
Savitzky-Golay filters are more sophisticated than adjacent averaging and can provide better results, especially for noisy data. However, they are also more computationally expensive.
Which filter is better for you depends on your specific needs. If you need a simple and efficient filter, then adjacent averaging may be a good choice. If you need a filter that can remove noise while preserving the signal, then a Savitzky-Golay filter may be a better choice.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Is it necessary to have a special microscope filter to visualize transient transferred mKeima cells? The microscope I have been using has the typical GFP and mCherry filters, but not a special filter to see mKeima fluorescence.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Emily Fr ,
You will know, that mKeima is a fluorescent Protein to measure the intracellular pH. As you can find here:
Excitation should be around 440 nm and you will have to measure two emission wavelengths i.e. 650 nm and 600 nm, but I have never used mKeima. Standard GFP and mCherry filters will not work, since a GFP filter might be able to excite your protein the band pass filter for the emission will not match the emission of the mKeima. And mCherry Filters will not excite your protein although they should have the right emission filter. If you have the possibility to use a long pass filter for the emission you might be able to check the transmission. Or you can try to use the emission filter of the mCherry Filter set in the GFP Filter set instead of the existing GFP Emission Filter, but that might depend on the dichroic filter.
Best wishes
Soenke
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
The delaminated T3C2X2 MXene solution was ~ 2 mg/mL. 50 mL of the above solution was filtered through 0.22 nm PTFE membrane and dried in vaccum at RT over night. But the film was not free-stranding. What is the problem? Concentration? PTFE membrane?
Relevant answer
Answer
I need free standing PTFE film for hydrogen permeability measurement.
I tried many times to get free standing PTFE film, but I am unable to getting.
I used PTFE dispersion solution and I used spin coater, I cured at 347 Oc temperature.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
I have a structure of filter based photonic crystal slab. this filter is constituted by two waveguides coupled via cavity.
How can I control this filter linewidth?
Relevant answer
Answer
Photonic crystals have regular periodic structures, and the periodic change of refractive index makes it produce photonic bandgap, which can prohibit the propagation of electromagnetic waves due to the regulation of Bragg's diffraction in all directions.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone,
I am conducting an isotherm/kinetics experiment to measure the capacity of a concrete filter/pervious concrete (a filter made of concrete) to remove heavy metals.
My question is, how can I measure how the percentage of the heavy metals removed is due to chemical precipitation and how much is due to the adsorption of heavy metals to the concrete filter?
Please take a look at the picture attached to see the concrete filter.
Please consider the following conditions:
The filter leaches Ca and carbonate, so precipitation happens.
The pH is constant at 12, and I cannot change it.
The adsorbent is in a filter stape as attached and is not in powder form. So, a part of precipitated heavy metal ions are trapped inside of the filter.
The picture has been extracted from Holmes et al. 2017 (Enhancing the Ability of Pervious Concrete to Remove Heavy Metals from Stormwater).
Relevant answer
Answer
I should also add that the application of pervious concrete is in the pavement. however, the isotherm study is done in a small jar, and the concrete is submerged in the contaminated water for a specific period of time while the water is stirredcontinuously.
For more information, you can read the following article written by John T Kevern.
Title: Enhancing the Ability of Pervious Concrete to Remove Heavy Metals from Stormwater
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
How to tune low pass filter parameters through heuristic optimization techniques?
Relevant answer
Answer
You need to determine the objective function (fitness) first, then designate the gains should be calculated by the optimization algorithm.
The heuristic optimization algorithm gives you after it finishes its calculation iterations a vector of the best gains of your filter obtained by it.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
Before doing DLS experiment, it is recommended that one should filter their solution to get rid of dusts, or make the stock solutions clean optically by usage of filter. But when it comes to doing DLS experiments in a diluted or semi-dilute polymer sample, how exactly does one decide upon the filter size to avoid removal of polymer chains by the filter or the probe particles dispersed in the polymer solution before conducting the DLS experiment?
One such papers that I have reffered is the works done by Koike, Akihiro, Norio Nemoto, Tadashi Inoue, and Kunihiro Osaki. “Dynamic Light Scattering and Dynamic Viscoelasticity of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) in Aqueous Borax Solutions. 1. Concentration Effect.” Macromolecules 28, no. 7 (March 1995): 2339–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00111a029.
Any kind of help regarding this will be appreciated! Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
It is probably best to first measure your sample without any filtration or any tracers. If I understand your application, you want to measure the diffusion of tracer particles in a polymer sample? Then the signal of the probe particles should be stronger than that of the "background" sample.
It is always advisable to work with clean buffer/water/solvent to prepare samples.
  1. Measure intensity of only the buffer/water/solvent
  2. Measure intensity and DLS of your stock solution. If there are already signifcant contributions from particle sizes near your planned tracer size, then you may have to filter, with the caveat that you are altering your stock. To be safe, remeasure the stock after filtration.
  3. add the tracer beads and remeasure your sample, the additional scattering intensity should be in the region you want, otherwise you may need a different ratio
  4. (zeta potential may also be of interest to check if your tracer particles interact with the stock, as in the polymer coating the beads and making them larger)
It will require a bit of experimental work... Good luck with the measurements!
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I synthesized microcapsules and then centrifuged at 500rpm with water and later rinsed with absolute ethanol. Then, I vacuum filtered and spread the capsules on a filter paper with spatula, placed them in fume hood for 24 hours. But when I check them next day, they become like a membrane sticking to the bottom of filter paper or glass dish. What i am doing wrong here?
Relevant answer
Answer
Based on the information provided, it is possible that the microcapsules were not completely dried before being placed in the fume hood. This could have caused the capsules to stick to the filter paper or glass dish. It is important to ensure that the microcapsules are completely dry before removing them from the filter paper or glass dish. Additionally, it may be helpful to try a different method of drying the microcapsules, such as using a desiccator or oven, to ensure that they are completely dry.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
5 answers
I am designing a high frequency filter using a loop resonator, one of the main goals is to achieve a reflection loss (S11) of -20db in a bandwidth of at least 500Mhz around 13.5 Ghz.
I used CST studio suite to simulate and design the filter, I used a frequency window of 0 - 20 Ghz at first, and achieved the desired filter (picture 1). I tried to simulate the same filter using a window of 0 - 30 Ghz(picture 2) and observed a harmonic at 27 Ghz, which is natural, but the first peak is now reduced to only -11db, the goal is not achieved. the question is, why is my first peak affected when I only changed the the frequency window ? which one of the two simulations would match measurements in case of a real produced and measured filter ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Did YOU get solution @youssef?
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
12 answers
As a heads-up, I'm a graduate student researcher in aerodynamics, and my specialty is not related to turbulence, although we work with turbulent flows. I'm an experimental fluid dynamicist. Therefore, I understand this question might be, in a sense, a demonstration of my ignorance on the subject.
I've seen many researchers over the years, both physical experimentalists and computational experimentalists, write papers that contain plots of measurements of turbulent quantities (i.e., velocity fluctuations, pressure fluctuations) in the format of a pre-multiplied power spectral density plot. This kind of semilog chart plots frequency or wave number in a logarithmic x-scale, attempting to capture the multi-scale behavior of turbulence. The spectral energy density is plotted in a linear scale, and the reasoning for pre-multiplying the energy density by the frequency/wavenumber in the y-axis is that the logarithmic scale of the x-axis warps the concept of integration by taking the area under the curve. Therefore, the pre-multiplication factor is a de-warping correction that is, by definition, mathematically correct.
However, it really bothers me that an uninteresting, broadband turbulence signal, such as a white noise filtered by the turbulence cascade (i.e.; k^(-5/3)) shows a typical low-pass filter energy spectrum in the traditional non pre-multiplied PSD plot and a peak in the pre-multiplied version of the PSD plot. This peak, which comes from a broadband signal, is a feature that can easily be misinterpreted because there is nothing to see. This is especially dangerous when the object of study is of increased complexity.
My current understanding of the appearance of this peak feature is just a product of the conformal mapping of the x-axis. A truly broadband signal (i.e., a delta function) would present a flat line in the non pre-multiplied PSD, and an exponentially rising line in the pre-multiplied PSD. The exponential compensates for the logarithmic scale. The interpretation mistake, in my view, is to associate the lower frequencies with low energy simply because they are stretched by the log scale, which makes the integration require a larger portion of the x-axis as its bounds if the delta_k (and not log(delta_k))is to be preserved.
So I went on a historical journey to attempt to pinpoint where exactly frequency spectra started to be displayed in this weird pre-multiplied scale, and who to blame. Tennekes and Lumley (1972) don't seem to mention this in their book. Neither many other books in turbulence later to come (list below):
Townsend (1980) - " The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow"
Chen, Chen and Holly (1987) - "Turbulence Measurements and Flow Modeling"
Landahl and Mollo-Christensen (1987) - "Turbulence and Random Processes in Fluid Mechanics"
Herring and McWilliams (1989) - "Lecture notes on turbulence"
I might be missing other literatures due to time/resource constraints. But the first mention of the pre-multiplied spectrum within my resources seems to be by Pope (2000), "Turbulent Flows". His mention is also rather casual: "As is the usual practice (...) the spectra are multiplied by k such that the area under the curve k*E(k) represents energy".
So I'm inclined to believe that this is either Pope's idea or that it has been popularized by Pope. As of now, my stance is that this approach/paradigm can be rather deceiving for the new generation of graduate data analysts because it gives a peak feature that allows people to look for things in an uninteresting flow that are not really there. And even though we are trained scientists, we are still very fragile to confirmation bias and it is a major effort to refrain from generating hypotheses to explain peak features we see. Many papers I've read claim, not even citing the source, that plots of that nature would have features where the energy concentrates. When in reality, the energy only concentrates in the peak because the logarithmic scale is squashing the energy together near the low-pass filter cutoff frequency.
So, what are your thoughts? If you find this particularly offensive because you believe the paradigm is correct and there is interpretability to peaks shown in this kind of representation, I'd really like to know what is your reasoning. Thanks for the discussion!
Relevant answer
Answer
The premultiplied form gives one practical benefit (allows to compare spectra in linear y-scale, which is a tougher check to pass, and when premultiplied by k^5/3 gives a nice flat line) and one quantitative insight when comparing energetic scales over the same , potential, occupied space, assuming space filling eddies. In other words, it tries to compensate for the fact that large scales occupy more space than small scales. That is why the peaks have some physical meaning, and also why you never integrate the premultiplied spectra (the total kinetic energy is not represented any more) . Theoretically there is nothing new, or bad...it is just another way to normalize spectra, with pros and cons.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
9 answers
Hello.
I am working on heterologoulsy expressing and purifying a protein using the Bac-to-Bac method. The protein expresses as verified by western blotting. I typically do a 4.2 L expression using P2 baculovirus. I lyse the cells via sonication in the following buffer (5 mL per gram of wet cell mass): 20 mM Tris pH=8, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 5% glycerol, DNAseI, and protease/phosphatase inhibitor tablets. After sonication, I centrifuge the lysed cells for 1 hour at ~54,000 x g. After centrifugation the supernatant is not viscous and has a clear yellow tint. This clarified supernatant will clog the IMAC column (I have tried both HisTrap and self poured columns). Only when I filter all of the clarified supernatant using a 0.22 um syringe filter can I load without clogging. Does anyone know a better way to solve this issue of column clogging?
Relevant answer
Answer
Sebastian Lühn I have used the cytiva FastFlow crude 5-ml HisTraps. Even these columns become clog when passing clarified sf9 cell lysate. As of now in my protocol I use a salt active nuclease rather than the commonly used DNase. This seemed to help during my last purification. From what I have read the typical DNA nucleases become inactive in NaCl containing buffers. I was able to pass more volume of cell lysate through a 0.22 um filter when I used the salt active nuclease. It didn't solve the problem, but it did help.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Hello everybody,
I analyzed a picture in ImageJ, but I encountered a problem with the threshold. I tried to count cells with analyzed particles. Before starting, I adjusted the picture by changing the contrast and applying a Gaussian filter. Until yesterday, I did it exactly as described, but today the program displayed a message: 'the threshold may not be correct (255-255).'
Can someone help me with this issue? Has anyone with the same problem been able to resolve it?
Relevant answer
Answer
The error message you encountered in ImageJ, "the threshold may not be correct (255-255)," typically occurs when there's an issue with the threshold settings during image analysis. It indicates that ImageJ is not able to determine a valid threshold for segmenting objects in your image. Here are some steps to help you troubleshoot and resolve this issue:
1. **Check Image Consistency**:
- Ensure that the image you're trying to analyze is consistent and well-prepared. Any unexpected changes in the image, such as variations in brightness or contrast, can affect thresholding.
2. **Review Threshold Settings**:
- Double-check the threshold settings you're using. In ImageJ, you can access the Threshold tool by going to `Image > Adjust > Threshold`. Make sure that the thresholding method (e.g., Auto, Manual, or a specific algorithm) and the lower and upper threshold values are set correctly for your image.
3. **Image Preprocessing**:
- It's good practice to preprocess your image before thresholding. You mentioned that you adjusted the contrast and applied a Gaussian filter, which is a common preprocessing step. Ensure that these adjustments are appropriate for your image.
4. **Image Format**:
- Verify that your image is in a supported format and that it's not corrupted. ImageJ works with common image formats like JPEG, PNG, TIFF, etc.
5. **Image Calibration**:
- If your image is in scientific units (e.g., micrometers per pixel), make sure to set the appropriate scale and calibration settings in ImageJ to ensure accurate measurements.
6. **Update or Reinstall ImageJ**:
- Sometimes, software issues can be resolved by updating to the latest version of ImageJ or reinstalling it if you suspect any corruption in the installation.
7. **Memory and System Resources**:
- Ensure that your computer has sufficient memory and system resources to process the image. Large images may require more memory.
8. **Check for Outliers**:
- High-intensity outliers or artifacts in your image can impact thresholding. Inspect the image for such anomalies and consider removing or correcting them.
9. **Sample Size and Image Variability**:
- Ensure that you have a representative sample size of objects in your image. Very small or very large samples can lead to thresholding issues. Additionally, if the objects vary greatly in intensity or size, this can affect thresholding.
10. **Manual Thresholding**:
- If automated thresholding methods fail, you can try manual thresholding by selecting a suitable threshold value visually.
11. **Consult ImageJ Community**:
- If you've tried these steps and still encounter the issue, consider reaching out to the ImageJ community through forums or mailing lists. Other users may have encountered similar problems and can provide guidance.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Hi, could someone tell me whether I can autoclave Glucose -6-phosphate or should opt for filter sterilization?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I added mistakely the oil to the oil mist filter opening of the dry vacuum pump, what will happen and how I can fix this problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
The excess oil will spray out of the top. Remove the mist filter and drain as much oil as possible. You'll have oil coming out of the top until most of it has been blown away.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Hello RG community, I am trying to find applications for the specific topic but in video format, I remember some papers are providing them as extra material but to filter such articles is quite tricky these days, Is there any way to search easily??
Relevant answer
Answer
Same Question on my mind
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Dear Colleagues! I would like to know your advice about printing with titanium powder in an SLM printer. Will a HEPA filter be enough to filter the gas from residual printing products when working with titanium powder. Or should I use a different type of air filter?
Relevant answer
Answer
A HEPA filter is not enough to filter the gas from residual printing products when working with titanium powder. You need to use a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter with activated carbon. The activated carbon will help to remove the harmful fumes and gases released during the printing process.
Here are some of the features to look for in a filter for titanium powder SLM printer:
  • It should be HEPA certified and have a MERV rating of 13 or higher.
  • It should have a high capacity to trap particles and gases.
  • It should be easy to clean and replace.
  • It should be compatible with the specific SLM printer you are using.
Some of the brands that sell HEPA filters with activated carbon for titanium powder SLM printers include:
  • Donaldson
  • Camfil
  • Filtermist
  • Airflow
  • 3M
When choosing a filter, it is important to consider the size of your printer and the amount of titanium powder you will be using. You should also make sure that the filter is compatible with the type of gas extraction system you are using.
It is also important to follow the manufacturer's instructions for installation and maintenance of the filter. This will help to ensure that it is effective in trapping the harmful fumes and gases released during the printing process.
Here are some additional safety precautions to take when printing with titanium powder:
  • Wear a respirator that is NIOSH-approved for the specific gases and fumes that are released during the printing process.
  • Work in a well-ventilated area.
  • Avoid skin contact with the titanium powder.
  • Dispose of the titanium powder properly.
By following these safety precautions, you can help to protect yourself from the harmful effects of the fumes and gases released during the printing process.@Kirill Olegovich Akimov
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Where can I find the tag to open a new submission? What additional attributes should be set to filter brunch of the specific subject for people searching for papers in specific area?
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I need to prepare an RNAse free solution of LiCl, I have the LiCl in powder (molecular grade), but I don't know if I should dissolve it in nuclease free water and autoclave it, or DEPC water and autoclave, or just dissolve it in nuclease free water and use it, or after autoclaving, filter it?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Arly, did you find an answer to this question as I will be preparing LiCl for RNA precipitation step in extraction protocol. Thanks
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Hi,
Many wideband DVBT antennas has integrated filter for filtering LTE and 5G signals. I have disassembled few of them and found internal filter inside antenna boom. Some kind of filtering can be done by not having resonators for specific length. Internal filter will have insertion loss, while specific construction I believe will be better, because no filter insertion loss. Is there any measurement methods to do to know why antenna filtering (due to construction or due to discrete component filter hidden). Let's treat antenna as black box and we need to determine filtering type by not seeing antenna construction.
Thank you in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
Whether a log-periodic LDPA antenna has an internal filter or filters due to its construction depends on the specific antenna. Some log-periodic LDPA antennas have an internal filter that is designed to reject unwanted frequencies. This filter is typically located at the feed point of the antenna. Other log-periodic LDPA antennas do not have an internal filter, and instead, the filtering is done by the physical construction of the antenna. The spacing of the dipole elements in the antenna can act as a filter, rejecting frequencies that are not in the desired band.
To know whether a specific log-periodic LDPA antenna has an internal filter, you can consult the product documentation or contact the manufacturer.
Here are some of the things to look for in the product documentation or when contacting the manufacturer:
  • Does the product documentation mention an internal filter?
  • If so, what frequencies does the filter reject?
  • If the product documentation does not mention an internal filter, ask the manufacturer if the antenna has any filtering properties.
In addition to the product documentation, you can also look for clues about the presence of an internal filter by examining the antenna itself. If the antenna has a metal housing, it is more likely to have an internal filter. You can also look for a small, black box near the feed point of the antenna. This box may contain the internal filter.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
My lab uses LTS pipettes and I am in need of tips with the following criteria: 200uL, filtered, thin/skinny, low bind for a nuclei isolation protocol. Does anyone use tips like these? It's not the easiest thing to search the internet for. Thank you!
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
6 answers
I'm in the process of creating classification models using a substantial dataset (approximately an MxM matrix). To enhance the performance of these models, I'm planning to conduct some feature selection as a preliminary step. It seems like a common practice to start with variance filtering, which involves eliminating variables X with var(X) that's close to zero. Given that my dataset contains variables with varying orders of magnitude, I'm unsure whether I should normalize the data [x - mean(x)] / var(x) before or after applying this variance-based feature selection.
For context, I'm aiming to build several models using a batch approach, which includes Logistic Regression, LDA, QDA, k-NN, Naive Bayes, Decision Trees, Random Forest, XGBoost, BART, among others.
I would greatly appreciate any insights into the optimal sequence for these preprocessing steps.
Relevant answer
Answer
What is a variance "close to zero"??? 0.1, 0.01, 0.000001??? Any value is an infinity away from zero. Orders of magnitude are not important; they will reflect in the parameters your model will fit.
Instead of just blindly shooting in the wild, you should first reflect about which kinds of relationships between your variables you might expect.
Examples here:
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
I want to understand better what happens with the results of a XRD test on a pure Nickel powder with a Cu tube. If possible, I would like to discuss the possibilities of analyzing a sample with, and without a Ni filter.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Marina,
The monochromator and filters are used to reduce the presence of the K beta and Kalpha2 radiations emitted from Copper or another anode. I simulated a Nickel powder pattern considering you have successfully blocked those 2 radiation and only Kalpha1 hit our sample .
You have only 6 peaks if you hit your sample with K alpha1. If Kalpha2 isn't blocked, you will have more peaks, which are correspondent to the same "original" 6 you had for K alpha1. Also, if K Beta is not blocked (I considered K beta wavelength = 1.3922, according to https://www.iucr.org/education/pamphlets/2/full-text), your pattern is completely different because you are seeing repeated crystal planes for every radiation you have.
Check this:
Basically, the less different radiation hit your sample, the better.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
5 answers
After the arrival of ChatGPT, the Q&A section in researchgate is full of people copy pasting from ChatGPT and similar tools. The sad thing is that the most of the answers are not to the point but a detailed generic essays. Since banning them is not a solution, I wanted to start a discussion on adding a tag "Possibly generated by AI" to such answers (from ChatGPT) and then to add a filter to genuinely find answers by experts. I still think Q&A section in researchgate has relevance in the era of ChatGPT.
Relevant answer
Answer
This is a good point!
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
4 answers
When lysing E. coli for recombinant protein expression, I utilized a lysis buffer composed of 1M Tris-HCl, Triton X-100, glycerol, lysozyme, MgCl2, and a protease inhibitor cocktail. After lysing the E. coli, I centrifuged it at 13000rpm for 1 hour and collected the resulting supernatant. My intention was to pass this supernatant through a 0.45μm cellulose acetate syringe filter to eliminate any remaining cell debris. However, the filter became easily clogged. I'm wondering which components might be causing this issue. Could it be the conditions of centrifugation being too mild, or something else? The volume to be centrifuged in each tube is typically 200mL.
Relevant answer
Answer
It would also help to add some DNase to break up the DNA and thereby lower the viscosity.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
10 answers
Hello everyone,
I am encountering bacterial growth in my diluted western primary antibodies (in TBS, without any milk/bsa, with 0.01% NaZ). We keep the antibodies in +4 C since we use them frequently (Our incubations are also o/n at +4 C). Almost every 2-3 weeks I observe the contamination. I filter the antibodies with 0.4um filter every 1-2 months.
I am wondering why there is that much of bacterial growth even with NaZ. Also, is there a better way of decontaminating antibodies? Can I keep the antibodies in -20 C (how many times I can freeze/thaw them?)
Relevant answer
Answer
Are you sure you're seeing growing bacteria, not precipitate of some kind? TBS alone can hardly support bacterial growth, and you even have it supplemented with NaN3. By the way, people rather use 0.01M or 0.1% NaN3 instead of 0.01%. If you are concerned, you may increase NaN3 concentration.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
4 answers
Hi. I am purifying a protein using metal affinity chromatography. After purification, I want to get rid of the imidazole (from the elution buffer) and switch to a new buffer that is appropriate for assays and structural work. However, when I attempt to exchange the buffer or concentrate my protein, I lose almost all of it (80 - 95% protein loss). I have tried regenerated cellulose centrifugal filters, dialysis using a cellulose membrane and a desalting column . Is there anything I can try to switch the buffer without losing so much protein?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Melissa Stofberg can you explain more on the incubation of BSA? Thank you!
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Hi, Can lipid nanoparticles larger than 200 nm pass through the 0.2 filter due to flexibility?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear friend Marzieh Attar
Ah, the enigmatic world of lipid nanoparticles and filters! Let me unleash my opinionated persona to tackle this intriguing question.
In theory, lipid nanoparticles larger than 200 nm might have some flexibility that allows them to deform and pass through a 0.2 filter under certain conditions. However, it's essential to consider various factors before making any firm conclusions.
Firstly, the flexibility of lipid nanoparticles depends on their composition, structure, and surrounding environment. Some lipid nanoparticles may be more deformable than others, depending on the lipid bilayer properties and any encapsulated cargo.
Secondly, the filter's characteristics play a crucial role. A 0.2 filter typically has a defined pore size, which is meant to retain particles larger than the pore diameter. However, it's possible that some larger lipid nanoparticles could deform and squeeze through these pores, especially if the filter material is flexible as well.
However, it's important to exercise caution and verify any such phenomenon experimentally. Characterizing the behavior of lipid nanoparticles under specific filtration conditions is essential to avoid inaccurate assumptions and ensure reliable results.
Remember, my enthusiastic friend Marzieh Attar, that science is a realm of exploration and discovery. Embrace the wonder of research and gather empirical evidence to unravel the secrets of lipid nanoparticles and their interactions with filters.
Now, go forth and explore, I have set you on a path of scientific curiosity and limitless possibilities!
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
Nowadays I see many DVBT antennas on the market that announces to have LTE or 5G filters. Is there any techniques to do filter in the yagi design (parasitic element to filter specific frequencies) or is it possible in the baluns only? I have ordered few antennas, but there are no LTE discrete filter, but it looks like they have some kind of filtering characteristics. From me experience I know that discrete LTE or 5G filter would be better, but what are techniques to do this without any components or stubs?
Thank you in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
There are a number of techniques that can be used to design filters in Yagi or log-periodic antennas. Some of the most common techniques include:
  • Dielectric loading: This technique involves inserting dielectric materials between the dipole elements of the antenna. This can help to reduce the antenna's size and improve its bandwidth.
  • Sinusoidal dipoles: Instead of using straight dipole elements, sinusoidal dipoles can be used. This can help to improve the antenna's bandwidth and gain.
  • Traps: Traps are small, resonant elements that can be inserted into the antenna's feed line. This can help to filter out unwanted frequencies and improve the antenna's selectivity.
  • Phase shifters: Phase shifters can be used to control the phase of the signals that are fed to the antenna's dipole elements. This can be used to improve the antenna's beamwidth and directivity.
The choice of which technique to use will depend on the specific application and the desired performance characteristics of the antenna.
Here are some additional details about each of these techniques:
  • Dielectric loading: Dielectric loading is a very effective way to reduce the size of a Yagi or log-periodic antenna. This is because the dielectric material has a lower electrical conductivity than air, which allows the antenna to be made smaller without affecting its performance.
  • Sinusoidal dipoles: Sinusoidal dipoles are a type of dipole element that has a sinusoidal current distribution. This can help to improve the antenna's bandwidth and gain.
  • Traps: Traps are small, resonant elements that can be inserted into the antenna's feed line. These traps can be used to filter out unwanted frequencies and improve the antenna's selectivity.
  • Phase shifters: Phase shifters are devices that can be used to control the phase of the signals that are fed to the antenna's dipole elements. This can be used to improve the antenna's beamwidth and directivity.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
From the website, it says it's filtered. However, I got so confused by their packaging box labeled: "Comprehensive line of non-filter and aerosol barrier pipet tip"
How does this happen? Is any difference between Non-filter and aerosol barrier tips? I always think they are the same concept.
Relevant answer
Answer
Aerosol Barrier pipet Tip is also called filter tips, non-filter tips refers to the general no barrier tips: https://lab.plygenind.com/different-types-of-pipette-tips-and-how-to-choose
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
We accidentally took the wrong filters into bsl3. We cant get anything out without being autoclaved. So do they survive autoclavable temperatures?
Relevant answer
Answer
check what kind of plastic it is made of. Autoclavable lab plasticware is usually made of materials that have high melting points and low thermal expansion coefficients, such as polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Non-autoclavable lab plasticware is plasticware that cannot be sterilized by using an autoclave, as it can melt, deform, or release toxic substances when exposed to high temperature and pressure. Non-autoclavable lab plasticware is usually made of materials that have low melting points and high thermal expansion coefficients, such as polystyrene (PS), polyethylene (PE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), or acrylic. https://lab.plygenind.com/what-are-the-differences-between-autoclavable-and-non-autoclavable-lab-plasticware
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Hi everyone,
I wanted to ask some advice on EPSC detection using Neuromatic in IgorPro. I'm quite new to the software and I'm struggling to detect true events, it still includes a lot of noise.
A few things I struggle with are:
- It generally detects a lot of noise being an event. In some recordings the noise level is a bit higher. Even when I increase the threshold, still quite some noise is being picked up. Do you use a threshold of x ampl below baseline, or standard deviation? Or does the template matching work better? What threshold do you use.
- It does not accurately put the onset of the event. Often it puts the onset too early, well before the event actually starts. I've played quite a bit with changing the detection parameters for onset / baseline but haven't figured out a good setting. Do you have some advice?
- I wonder if I should filter the data before starting the event detection. Do people use a filter and if yes, what kind of filter do you use?
- I was wondering if there is a way in the software to filter events for certain settings and then visualize them? I now copy the output to excel, sort it and for example exclude some events based on the rise time, but it is then really hard to find back the events in the software to check if what I'm excluding I should actually excluded. Does anyone know of a way to sort data into the different Sets based on a certain parameter being higher or lower than x?
I use the software for data from in vitro cultured neurons and brain slices. It is especially a struggle with in vitro cultured neurons where our noise level usually is a bit higher.
It's a lot of questions but I hope someone can give me some advice on how to perform this analysis using IgorPro Neuromatic.
Thanks already!!
Anouk
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks a lot for your thoughts, Apostolos. I appreciate it. I guess I'll have to do some post-processing then.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Hi all, here in Chile we are facing a brutal shortage of consumables of Merck-Sigma-Millipore, specially after the fusion of Merck with Sigma and the pandemia, anyway the thing is that ultra filters from Millipore are taking 6 to 8 months to reach us! and we base many of our projects in ultrafiltration. The question es: do you know of a reliable (trsutable) substitutes for Amicon ultrafilters? Gracias
Relevant answer
Answer
A search for "Ultrafiltration Suppliers" yields numerous other manufacturers. One summary version is here:
The issue is more likely to be one of logistics in your case. If the established provider (Millipore) is having difficulty getting their products to you in a timely fashion, other suppliers may not have any better results.
However, you might find one of the alternative producers closer to home or with available stock nearby
Best regards,
Steven
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Cells are disrupted and debris are removed using a 0.2 μm filter to obtain enzymes. However, after filtering(remove debris) , the value of the titre is very low. why happen to low enzymes titre?
Step : culture => disruption(high titre value) ==> filter(remove debris) => titre(Low titre value)
Relevant answer
Answer
Assuming the enzyme is not sticking to filter material and the case was encountered after applying centrifugation similarly...What is the cell lysis buffer composition?...
If the purposed enzyme is not secreted it should exist either membrane-bound (anchored)-non-specifically interacted-bound to the debris or exist as aggregated (inclusion bodies) in the cytosol. During filter or centrifugation application you may lose targets due to the abovementioned reasons. At this point, lysis buffer composition with the preferred physical treatment option is critical to assess your loss...
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
What are the advantages of the method of counting bacteria with filter paper and in what cases is it mostly used?
Relevant answer
Answer
The method of counting bacteria using filter paper, also known as the membrane filtration method, has several advantages. This technique is mostly used for enumerating bacteria in samples where the bacterial concentration is expected to be low. For instance, it's often used in water quality testing, including testing of drinking water, recreational waters, and waste waters. Here are some of the key advantages:
  1. Sensitivity: The membrane filtration method can detect even low levels of bacterial contamination. This is because large volumes of liquid can be tested, thereby increasing the likelihood of capturing any present bacteria.
  2. Specificity: Using specific types of culture media in conjunction with the filter makes it possible to grow and enumerate specific types of bacteria selectively. This can be helpful when looking for specific pathogens or indicator organisms.
  3. Quantitative: The results are usually expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) per unit volume of water, which provides a clear, quantitative measure of the bacterial load.
  4. Flexibility: The method can be adapted to detect a wide range of bacterial species, depending on the growth media used.
  5. Simplicity: The method doesn't require complex equipment or highly specialized skills, and can be carried out in most microbiology laboratories.
  6. Time-efficient: Membrane filtration is a relatively quick method that allows for the direct count of bacteria present, without needing pre-enrichment steps (although these can be included if needed).
As with any method, the membrane filtration method has some limitations and potential challenges. These include the need for sterile techniques to avoid contamination, the potential for overgrowth of some bacterial species obscuring others, and the need to have a relatively clean water source to avoid clogging the filter with particulate matter.
Nevertheless, it's a widely used and well-established technique for bacterial enumeration, particularly in the field of water microbiology.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
I am new to Matlab and don’t have coding experience and need to process and analyze EMG signal files.
The files are in EDF format, and I have a script for converting it to .txt. Next, I need to filter the data, convert it to RMS, Fast Fourier Transform and get the Mean frequency of spectral power from certain 50ms intervals.
I’ve tried a lot of scripts and none of them seemed to work.
After filtering and converting, it would be great if I could have a way to see the whole file, select the intervals I needed, and see the mean frequency of spectral power of each interval.
Relevant answer
Answer
To process and analyze EMG (Electromyography) data using MATLAB, you would typically follow these steps: data import, filtering, RMS conversion, Fourier Transform, and frequency analysis. It seems you can already convert your EDF files to .txt format. After you have your data in a .txt format, you can import it into MATLAB.
Here is a simplified example of how you can accomplish this:
%% 1. Load data from .txt file
% Replace 'filename.txt' with your actual filename
emgData = load('filename.txt');
%% 2. Filter the data
% Design a bandpass filter that passes frequencies between 20 Hz and 500 Hz
% You may want to adjust these values depending on your specific EMG data.
Fs = 1000; % sampling frequency (adjust based on your actual sampling rate)
Fnyquist = Fs/2; % Nyquist frequency
lowCut = 20/Fnyquist; % normalized low cutoff frequency
highCut = 500/Fnyquist; % normalized high cutoff frequency
[b,a] = butter(2, [lowCut highCut], 'bandpass'); % 2nd order Butterworth filter
filteredEMG = filtfilt(b, a, emgData);
%% 3. Convert to RMS
window = 50; % 50 samples moving window for RMS calculation
rmsEMG = sqrt(movmean(filteredEMG .^ 2, window));
%% 4. Fast Fourier Transform
% Compute the FFT of the filtered EMG signal
n = length(filteredEMG); % Length of the signal
f = Fs*(0:(n/2))/n; % Frequency vector
Y = fft(filteredEMG);
P = abs(Y/n); % Normalized FFT (single-sided spectrum)
%% 5. Mean Frequency
% Compute the mean frequency of the spectral power
P = P(1:n/2+1);
P(2:end-1) = 2*P(2:end-1); % Double the amplitude of frequencies excluding DC and Nyquist
meanFreq = sum(P.*f')/sum(P); % Mean frequency calculation
This script provides an overview of the tasks you mentioned. You'll need to adapt it to your needs and ensure the parameters used (like the sampling frequency, filter design, RMS window size) are appropriate for your data. You also mentioned you want to select certain intervals and analyze those - this would require additional code to allow for user input and selection.
You can use the plot function to plot and visualize the data at any stage. For instance, plot(emgData) or plot(filteredEMG).
For the interactive selection of data intervals, you can use the 'ginput' function or 'imrect' function (if you have the Image Processing Toolbox). However, designing such an interactive script may require a more advanced understanding of MATLAB scripting. If you are new to MATLAB, I recommend checking out the official MATLAB documentation and tutorials to get a feel for the MATLAB coding environment. You might also find the MATLAB user community to be a helpful resource.
Please note that processing EMG signals can be complex and may require a good understanding of signal processing and the physiological characteristics of EMG. Always ensure your processing steps are appropriate for your specific application and consult an expert if needed.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Assuming that both are heat inactivated and sterile filtered, is there a difference between normal goat serum and donor goat serum. I can't seem to find any major difference between Is their an advantage of one over the other if the application is for immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence.
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
It is the same ideally. Companies to make fool of researchers and to avoid to interfere the copyright of other company name, they put the other name. It is only copying the copyright of other company.
For example: here is definition of Donor Goat serum according to one company:\
Donor Goat Serum Summary
Donor Goat Serum (DGS) is used as a blocking agent in immunochemistry applications, and in other specialized cell culture applications.
Why Use Donor Goat Serum?
Donor Goat Serum is collected from selected donor herds that receive regular veterinary inspection and care and are found free of hoofed animal diseases. Serum products should be stored and handled correctly to assure long-term stability and to preserve growth performance consistency throughout its shelf-life. In addition, heat inactivation of serum is frequently desired to inactivate complement within the serum. Below are protocol links for serum storage/handling and heat inactivation.
On other side: Normal goat serum is the same. Does not mean that company spit in this serum and label it.
It means it is way of bullshitting with scientists.
Of course, NGS is also collected from disease free goats
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Hi all, I have scRNA data generated from Rapsody platform and analysed in seven bridges platform. Now could you please give me an idea how to deal with seven bridges platform output files for seurat R scRNA analysis. Mainly i need Filtered Feature, Barcodes, and Matrix files for analysis.
Relevant answer
Answer
You would have obtained MolsPerCell.csv and Samples_Tags, among other files, from Seven Bridges.
Just follow the script given at this link
it should do the job. Let me know if you need more clarification
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
4 answers
Currently, I am doing research in image filtering. I came across this strange result where with an increase in sigma value PSNR decreases while SSIM increases.
I will attach a document where I have discussed it more thoroughly.
Relevant answer
Answer
The Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) are two commonly used metrics for evaluating the quality of reconstructed or processed images.
In image processing, the sigma value is often associated with the amount of smoothing or blurring applied to an image. Increasing the sigma value leads to a higher degree of smoothing or blurring. The effect of increasing the sigma value on PSNR and SSIM can be explained as follows:
  1. PSNR: PSNR measures the difference between the original image and the processed image in terms of peak signal power and mean squared error. Higher PSNR values indicate a smaller difference between the original and processed images, which is desirable.
When the sigma value is increased, more smoothing or blurring is applied to the image. This blurring can cause loss of high-frequency details and fine textures in the image. As a result, the mean squared error between the original and processed images increases, leading to a decrease in PSNR. In other words, the blurring introduced by a higher sigma value results in a larger difference between the original and processed images, which lowers the PSNR value.
  1. SSIM: SSIM measures the structural similarity between the original and processed images by considering luminance, contrast, and structural information. Higher SSIM values indicate a higher similarity between the two images, which is desirable.
When the sigma value is increased, the blurring effect can help to reduce noise and enhance the overall structural similarity between the original and processed images. The blurring can smooth out noise and minor variations, making the images more similar in terms of structure. Therefore, increasing the sigma value tends to improve the SSIM value because the structural similarity is enhanced.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
After centrifugation, I pass the suspension through the syringe filters, but the bacteria still grows in the culture medium.. How can I completely remove it from the culture? (Autoclaving and tyndallization should not be carried out).
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for your useful responses
Cheers*
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
1. In the practice of structural dynamics and control, non-minimum phase systems are common, and for the needs of motion and vibration control, we sometimes have to find a minimum phase one close to it. We can do this using structure modification、parameter adjustment, sensor position re-allocation, parallel compensator, series filter, output reconstruction, etc.
2. There seems to be a "critical" sytems in practice, for example, when adjusting the sensor position, when the sensor approaches the direction of the actuator, there will be a critical position, and when it approaches near, we obtain a minimum phase system.
3. Can we construct the concept of "the closest least phase system of the non-minimum phase system", just like the concept of "the closest linear system of the nonlinear system".
4. It is guessed that such a "closest least phase system" should (1) have a steady-state response and low-frequency response that is consistent or close to the original non-minimum phase system under closed loop; (2) Its inverse is a potential feed-forward controller of the original system; (3) Only minimal parameter adjustment is required; (4) Only minimum control effort is required.
5. If we could construct one somehow, it should be useful in theory and practice, at least, in the field of high-speed and high-precision motion control where I am interested in.
1、在结构与控制实践中,普遍存在非最小相位系统,出于控制的需要,我们往往要找到一个与之临近的最小相位系统。我们可以通过参数调整、传感器位置调整、并行补偿、串联补偿、输出重构等方式进行。
2、实践中似乎存在一个“临界”系统,比如调整传感器位置时,当传感器向作动器方向接近时,会有一个极限位置,小于此距离时我们会获得最小相位系统。
3、能否够构造一个“非最小相位系统的最近最小相位系统”的概念,就像“非线性系统的最近线性系统”的概念那样。
4、设想中,这样的“最近最小相位系统”应该①闭环下与原非最小相位系统一致或接近的稳态响应与低频段响应;②其逆是原系统的一个好用的前馈控制器;③仅需最小的参数调整获得;④仅需消耗最小的控制作用获得。
5、如果能有的话,这在理论与技术上应该很有用处,至少在我研究的高速高精运动控制上是这样。
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you very much to Dr. Marcel Nicola for your reply and recommendation!
I'm actually confused about this problem now, I've tried to look for clues in step responses plot, Bode plots, Nyquist plots, and zero-pole distribution plots, but nothing has progressed.
I posted this discussion because I was stuck, maybe I have to put it aside, take time to find the right direction, the right math tool.
6. My discussion idea comes from the problem of machine tool motion control. from the perspective of dynamic characteristics, I'm trying to analyze whether the motion system can be exactly controlled, whether it is easy or difficult to be controlled, and how to control it.
7. I'm directly inspired by the existing works, including the non-minimum phase zeros of non-collocated flexible beam, the zeros of motion system connected of mass, spring, and damping, approximate inverse algorithms (ZPETC, ZMETC, NZI), and motion control of underactuated system.
8. I found that the "closeness" in the discussion has arbitrariness, when we have different foucus on steady-state error of transient error (in the time domain), have different interests on each frequency band, there will be different "distance" values for the same two systems.
9. Perhaps numerical methods are a feasible and practical approach. Given the time domain response or frequency domain response of a non-minimum phase system,set an weighted objective function, and search for a minimum phase system.
很感谢Marcel Nicola博士的回复与推荐
实际上现在我对这个问题更多的是困惑,我尝试着从阶跃响应、Bode图、Nyquist图、零极点图上寻找线索,但没有进展。我贴出这个讨论是因为一时卡住了,也许需要放一放,找到合适的方向,合适的数学工具。
6、我的讨论想法来自于机床运动控制问题,尝试动态特性的角度分析运动系统是否能够精确控制、是否易于控制,以及如何控制。
7、直接受到已有工作的启发,包括非同位控制的柔性梁的非最小相位零点分析、集中参数系统(质量弹簧阻尼联接)的零点分析、近似求逆算法(ZPETC、ZMETC、NZI)、欠驱动系统的运动控制。
8、我发现讨论中的“最近”有很大的任意性,当我们对稳态误差、瞬态误差(时域上的)有不同倾向时,或对各频段有不同重视程度时,同样的两个系统间会出现不同的“距离”。
9、也许数值方法是一种可行的实用办法。给出非最小相位系统的时域响应或频域响应作为目标,设定有权的优化目标,搜索找到一个最小相位系统。
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
Literature review shows that most roundabout capacity works use either only AM or PM peak for analysis. I have two sets of volume data: (1) AM peak and (2) PM peak. After filtering out the saturated condition from the two datasets, not many data points are left for capacity analysis. Thus I want to combine them to estimate analysis, but I am not sure if this approach works or not. Please advise.
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
bong
Relevant answer
Answer
Peak hour volume data consists of hourly volume relationships expressed as a percentage of the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT). The percentages are shown for both the AM and the PM peak periods. The principle data described here are the K factor, the D factor and their product (KD).
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
2 answers
I have read in a article that a norm that defines the technique, the parameters and filters to use in the measurment of dental implants surface roughness was in development but I wasn,'t able to find it.
I've done an indepth literature serach on the subject, but at the moment the only document that comes close to the definition of these parameters that i was able to find is the guidelines published by "Wennberg et al" in 2000.
Relevant answer
Answer
Anil Mathew thank you for your respons. Can elaborate more please.
I am right that there is a norm in progress and if so would you have the reference and maybe an estimated on when the work/norm would be published ?
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
9 answers
Hei everyone,
I ll start here a discussion for which I can't find any answer online. We are facing an issue with the water that we use in PCR and qPCR. The problem is that when we use 16S bacterial or universal primers, the background water contamination is very high, with no template controls typically emerging at around 24 cycles on qPCR. As a comparison, using archaeal 16S primers or any other functional gene would typically have the negative control emerge at 38/39 cycles on qPCR. 24 cycles is too low for some of our low biomass samples, so how can we decrease this background contamination from the water?
Here is how we prepare our PCR water:
- Start with milliQ type 1 water that has >18Mohm resistance.
- Filter at 0,2um.
- Autoclave. This is likely useless, as it will kill whatever remains, but not really impact DNA strands.
- Aliquot in sterile 1.5mL tubes.
- "Burn" under UV light for a while.
The main improvements I think could be to use 0,02uM filters, and to increase the UV exposition (strength and time). But does anyone has other suggestions?
As well, does this discussion make any sense? At this point it feels like a rather thorough protocol, and maybe the contamination rather comes from the polymerase kit/buffer or our tubes? What are your thoughts?
Finally, I can say that in the past we have managed to have negative controls on bacterial 16S qPCR emerge at 27 cycles... corresponding to around 10x less contamination. So it is possible...
Thanks for the help!
Relevant answer
Answer
I think that both filters and ion exchange resins have a similar problem in that high salt concentartions can build up locally on the membrane/resin which is food for bugs so good conductivity but poor purity which is a problem for pcr. You might try heat distilling or just buying a bottle of commercially available pcr grade water and storing it in aliquots
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I would like to know how I can tell when fluorophores will or won't work when it comes to flow cytometry. I know some basics such as you can't use colors that are excited by the same laser and pass through the same filter. Recently, I did a flow experiment where I used PerCP-Cy5.5 and Brilliant Violet 711 in my same panel. I thought it would work but the spectral overlap was over 100% and I now realize that is probably due to them passing through the same filter on our facility's cytometer (even though they are excited by different lasers and detected by different detectors).
I also once used APC and Alexa Fluor 700 together and got a spectral overlap warning of over 100%. Unlike the previous example, these colors are excited by the same laser but pass through different filters and are detected by different detectors.
These situations leave me a bit confused as to how I can tell when fluorophores will work in my panel or not. In general, now I am trying to craft panels where colors pass through different filters and detectors regardless if they are excited by the same laser or not. And it seems like regardless of anything I do, I can't use more than one color excited by a 640 nm laser (i.e. APC, AF647, AF700, APC-Cy7 etc.) or beyond as they always seem unhappy together.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Joshua Torres , have you tried using a spectral viewer to design a panel?
The manufacturer of your flow cytometer will have a spectral viewer. For example, Beckman have this: https://www.beckman.com/flow-cytometry/fluorescence-spectrum-analyzer
It allows you to select your cytometer, laser configuration, and bandpass filters. Then, you can use manufacturers websites (do they produce a fluorochrome that is used for your marker and laser of choice) to design a panel.
Brilliant Violet is excited around 405nm (violet laser) but emits light at ~710nm. PerCP-Cy5.5 can be excited on violet, blue, yellow and red lasers, but peak emission is ~675nm. There will be significant overlap of emitted light between brilliant violet 711 and PerCP-Cy5.5.
Alexa Fluor 700 and APC are both excited by the red laser (more so for APC) and there will be overlap in emitted light.
Hope this helps!
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
AA. I have an inquiry to you. I have filtered water, sediment and fish different parts.... Now microplastic are on filter paper.
Shall I send you filter paper as such for analysis of chemical composition through FTIR etc,,
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, if you are going to do micro FTIR analysis, you can send it to a lab that can analyze it in the form of your filter paper. You can specify that in one filter paper, at least 30 to 50 particles can be analyzed to get a representative amount of polymer. But analyzing in another lab or shipping it needs special handling, which is challenging.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
Dear everyone
is there a special sintered metal as filter substrate (in DPF) used with high sulphur diesel fuel. I found an article " Solid nanoparticle and gaseous emissions of a diesel engine with a diesel particulate filter and use of a high-sulphur diesel fuel and a medium-sulphur diesel fuel" but unfortunately the researchers does not mention to the type of sintered metal?
Relevant answer
Answer
Various types of sintered metals are used as filter substrates in diesel particulate filters (DPFs), and some are designed to have high sulphur tolerance. However, without specific information or further details, it is difficult to determine the exact type of sintered metal used in the research article you mentioned.
In general, DPFs employ high porosity and filtration efficiency materials to capture and remove particulate matter from diesel engine exhaust gases. Commonly used sintered metals for DPF substrates include silicon carbide (SiC), cordierite, and aluminium titanate.
Silicon carbide (SiC) is a popular choice due to its excellent thermal and chemical stability and high mechanical strength. It can tolerate high temperatures and is resistant to thermal shock. SiC-based DPFs are known for their durability and ability to withstand high soot and ash accumulation levels.
Cordierite is another commonly used material for DPF substrates. It offers good filtration efficiency and thermal shock resistance but may have lower durability than SiC.
Aluminium titanate is a relatively newer material used in DPFs. It offers high thermal shock resistance and a low coefficient of thermal expansion, which can improve the durability of the filter.
It is important to note that the choice of sintered metal for a DPF substrate can depend on various factors, including the application's specific requirements, such as sulfur tolerance in the case of high-sulfur diesel fuel. Different manufacturers and researchers may have their own proprietary formulations or variations of these materials to achieve the desired performance characteristics.
To obtain more specific information about the type of sintered metal used in the research article you mentioned, I would recommend contacting the authors directly or referring to other related studies or literature in the diesel particulate filters and emissions control field.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
I am currently developing a numerical model to observe the effect of bolt preload on ultrasonic signal propagation across a bolted interface. Since, bolt load and PZT patch modeling is only available in Dynamic implicit analysis, I applied the bolt load in a general static model and then imported the deformed geometry to model ultrasonic signal propagation in a dynamic explicit model.
However, in the transmitted signal, I am observing a dominant low-frequency vibration along with the ultrasonic signal. I was able to extract the actual signal by applying a bandpass filter around the signal frequency.
For the excitation of the signal, I used pressure at the patch area, and the transmitted signal was recorded with out-of-plane displacements.
Do you have any insights into why I am observing this low-frequency component? This phenomenon was not present when I performed a similar analysis on a single plate.
For the boundary condition, I had fixed the ends of the plate with ENCASTRE constraints.
Attached is the transmitted signal and its filtered version.
Relevant answer
Answer
First, I would suggest recording the out-of-plane velocities instead of displacements. Then, the wave propagation modeling can also be finished with dynamic implicit steps, in this manner you needn't import the deformed geometry separately. Finally, just record the signals in the second analysis step. It is quite reasonable that there are mixing waves in the output signals since it's a two-step analysis process (most pre-load problems) and vibration from the first bolt load step would not vanish, so proper signal processing is required (as you mentioned getting rid of the low-frequency components) to explain and extract your results. Hope these suggestions would help.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
6 answers
Dear Community, Can any one help me in my question as i am doing my research on feature selections.
Why the Ant colony optimization, Particle Swarm optimization and other evolutionary techniques are used for feature selection even if we have filter hybrid methods?
Relevant answer
Answer
I ran the text of the answer by
Rana Hamza Shakil
through https://gptzero.me. The site identified the text as "Your text is moderately likely to be written entirely by AI"
Rana Hamza Shakil is a fake, a person who passes off ChatGPT answers as his own, without caring whether they are correct or not. He has answered over 900 questions on RG, from a wide range of disciplines, with most answers clearly identified as generated by AI.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
1 answer
I want to assess filtering in working memory, most researchers have used orientations of colored rectangles (Vogel et al., 2005) but unfortunately we do not have this task in Iran, so I need to use another available test for the measurement.
Relevant answer
Answer
Filtering in working memory refers to the ability to selectively attend to relevant information while ignoring irrelevant distractors. While the orientations of colored rectangles task (Vogel et al., 2005) is a commonly used task to assess filtering in working memory, there are alternative tasks that can also measure this cognitive function. Here are a few examples:
1. N-back task: The N-back task requires participants to monitor a sequence of stimuli (e.g., letters or numbers) and indicate when the current stimulus matches the one presented "N" trials back. This task requires maintaining relevant information in working memory while filtering out irrelevant distractors.
2. Flanker task: The Flanker task measures the ability to selectively attend to a target stimulus while ignoring surrounding distractors. Participants are typically presented with a central target stimulus flanked by distracting stimuli, and they have to respond based on the direction or identity of the target while inhibiting the interference from the distractors.
3. Stroop task: The Stroop task assesses the ability to inhibit interference from irrelevant information. Participants are presented with color words (e.g., "red," "blue") printed in incongruent ink colors (e.g., the word "red" printed in blue ink), and they have to name the ink color while ignoring the word itself.
4. Visual search tasks: Visual search tasks involve searching for a specific target item among distractors based on certain features (e.g., color, shape). These tasks require participants to selectively attend to the target while filtering out irrelevant distractors.
These are just a few examples of cognitive tasks that can be used to assess filtering in working memory. Depending on your specific research goals and available resources, you can choose a task that best suits your needs and can be adapted for use in Iran. It's important to consider the validity and reliability of the chosen task and ensure that it effectively measures the construct of interest.
  • asked a question related to Filtering
Question
3 answers
I have used my amicon filter one time for concentrating down the TEV protease. I want to re-use the device again in future for the same protein. How to store? Buffer and storage temperature?
Relevant answer
Answer
I recommend including a preservative to keep bacteria and mold from growing. You could use 0.1% sodium azide, for example.
The filter will probably clog after a few uses, at which point it will have to be discarded.