Journalism - Science topic

I am very happy to know that Professor Lipsey is going well and observing ResearchGate.

One year latter, I am having the same problem. Please, did someone find a solution?

I just received a similar email,

and what made me especially angry was that they claimed to have an impact factor, which would mean that they are being listed by Web of Science. That is definitely not the case. At their website they specify that what they call "impact factor" is their own calculation based on Google Scholar.

The predatory journal scene is getting more and more ruthless it seems.

Here's a copy of the email I received:

"Dear Dr. Eerik Soares Mantere,

Greetings!

Hope you are doing well.

Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine is a bimonthly Journal with Impact Factor 1.5*

We would be more grateful if you can submit a short review or a short commentary (or any type of article) related to your previous Article entitled “A protocol for a systematic review of social dimensions of resilience in older adults”

It would be great if you could submit in June. So that I could process it for the Upcoming Issue. I request you to submit it by June 11, 2024.

Note: We will extend the date of submission as per your convenience.

Articles can be sent to [email protected]

Please provide me your acceptance for the same.

Warm Regards,

Mia Jasmine

Journal Coordinator | Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine (ISSN: 2381-8662)"

Congratulations. I am also engaged in research in the field of tennis. I look forward to the publication of your manuscript.

i need template of Construction and Building Materials elsevier journal??? can you help me?

I am interested.

Do you have its EndNote Style?

I agree. I try to avoid publishing in journals in the Elsevier portfolio for the same reason.

"The past 20 years has seen a significant increase in articles with 500 or more authors. This increase has presented problems in terms of determining true authorship versus other types of contribution, issues with database metadata and data output, and publication length. Using items with 500+ authors deemed as mega-author titles, a total of 5,533 mega-author items were identified using InCites. Metadata about the items was then gathered from Web of Science and Scopus. Close examination of these items found that the vast majority of these covered physics topics, with medicine a far distant second place and only minor representation from other science fields...

Some solutions are offered for the problems resulting from this phenomenon..."

One solution is to use: https://converter.app/docx-to-latex/result.php?lang=en to convert docx file to latex.

Hi, Joseph C Lee Wolfgang R. Dick this is one of my papers I wrote in 2021 and submitted it to this journal but the supervisor refused to publish it with my name. Now he published it with his new master student look how awful dishonesty of those dudes at China University of Petroleum (East China) is iL can‘t imagine such a bullshit academia more than this. east-squares RTM in nonorthogonal coordinates and applicati...

I think some MDPI journals are problematic. Others are pretty good, and have impact factors. But as of this writing (March 2024), they have suffered some scrutiny from Web of Science over issues like publishing too many articles and special issues (in certain journals) and having too much overlap among special issues, and some other problems. MDPI, as I understand, is working to manage these issues more carefully, though Web of Science (I have heard) has removed some otherwise pretty good journals of theirs from the Journal Citation Reports. I hope MDPI will fix these problems, but if you are going to submit to MDPI, be careful to check into your target journal carefully and see what others are saying and what they have been publishing recently.

Interested

Thank you so much Sir for this information.

Finding a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) based on the journal’s name, volume, and page can be straightforward. Here are some steps you can take:

Remember that DOIs play a crucial role in scholarly communication, making it easier to retrieve and cite works. If you encounter any difficulties, consider reaching out to the journal or using Crossref to locate the DOI. Happy researching! 📚

Respected all ,

i would be interested in reviewing . Kindly pass on any opprtunities . Thank you

"Scientific publishers have started to use AI tools such as ImageTwin, ImaCheck and Proofig to help them to detect questionable images. The tools make it faster and easier to find rotated, stretched, cropped, spliced or duplicated images. But they are less adept at spotting more complex manipulations or AI-generated fakery..."

Worst Journal. Never submit to it.

Yes, they can be indexed.

"We have listened to and consulted with the community and, as a result, we have removed a restriction in order to avoid unjustly penalising reputable journals.

In November 2023, we announced new criteria for inclusion in DOAJ relating to the publication of special issues. We were pleased that community feedback on the new criteria was generally positive as a step towards ensuring that all special issues are published with adequate editorial oversight..."

Go to the Wiley Author Services website: https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/Prepare-Your-Manuscript/LaTeX-templates.html (ref to Abdul Hai )

And replace the "STIX1COL" with "STIX2COL" in "APA//wileyNJD-APA.tex" file to get two column style, which would make the first codeline:

'''

\documentclass[APA,STIX2COL]{WileyNJD-v2}

'''

dear author,

I am the assistant editor of the CSSE journal. Have you solved the issue?

Most of the trusted and indexed journals are free of charge regarding the APC.

The problem has been solved, I think it is due to the contribution of researchgate's power in reaching a wide scientific community.

Yours Sincerely

Dear Sonal M Manohar ,

Your observation has to do with the fact that starting in 2023 Clarivate assign an impact factor to journal titles indexed in their ESCI database, see the announcement here https://clarivate.com/news/clarivate-announces-changes-to-the-2023-journal-citation-reports/

While in other years numerous RG members released the latest JCR report (with either only the impact factors or with the quartile Q info as well) it seems that Clarivate effectively prohibited this possibility (since the impact factor info etc. requires a license so payment). All the (incomplete) JCR lists of last year shared here on RG lack (impact factor etc.) info about the ESCI indexed journal titles.

However the good news is that the (claimed) index in ESCI can be checked free of cost here https://mjl.clarivate.com/home If you search for a title (like Scientia Pharmaceutica) and the info confirms the ESCI indexing then you can trust the impact factor info. I never saw examples where the journals lie about this when one visits the websites of journals from serious publishers (like Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and also MDPI) so the impact factor mentioned can be trusted.

Best regards.

نعم، أن إحدى مواضيع الرأسمالية اليوم هو كيف جني الأرباح من حقل العلم، ويأتي ذلك عن طريق فتح الجامعات والمعاهد والمدارس، وهدفهم الأوحد في هذا الشأن ليس لتطوير المعارف وإنما هو جني الأرباح لا غير.

1) It's authentic. Just sometimes back, my Ph.D. batchmate published her paper there.

2) I've not been able to view any previous articles, I guess it's strictly subscription-based viewing. However, Abstracts at least should have been made available.

3) After they accept papers, they ask for "Production fee", my batchmate paid around INR 9.5K

4) Decision time was 2 months for her.

I had submitted a manuscript to a journal (I am keeping it anonymous). I opted to make the preprint available online by mistake and the manuscript preprint appeared in the research square from the date of submission. The manuscript was rejected from the journal after the review process. The review process itself took more than one year. By the time, we (authors) switched to another institution and our affiliations, and our contact mail ids mentioned on the research square preprint became invalid. We noticed that the content of our preprint was copied from the research square to other repositories without any consent from us (authors). We got continuous rejections from other journals due to serious plagiarism when we tried to submit an extended version of our rejected manuscript. We regret to say that the preprint posted on the research square really became a trap that haunted us and spoiled our freedom to extend our research in the same direction and revise the manuscript. From our experience, other journals reject the manuscripts with preprints of previous journal submissions posted on the research square at editorial level itself. The name of the previous journal is clearly written on the research square preprint. As the journals get sufficiently large number of submissions, editors reject such papers at editorial level itself, to avoid further conflicts. A lot of hard work is involved in writing a research paper. It is so painful that authors are not able to submit their research work to a journal of own choice because of the issues caused by the preprint posted on the research square by mistake. We honestly request you to think twice before opting to publish preprints on research square during the manuscript submissions. Research square never removes the preprint content. They just keep the preprint content with a "Withdrawal Notification". The content will still cause problems during plagiarism checks.

JCR Impact factor 2023

Could you send me the link of reviewer certificate

Dear Anak Agung Bagus Wirayuda ,

Well first of all the publisher OPAST is mentioned in the Beall’s list (https://beallslist.net ) of potential predatory publishers. This is a red flag and by itself not enough to say they are predatory but there are more red flags:

-The most important is that their indexing info (https://www.opastpublishers.com/international-publisher/indexing-abstracting.html ) is full of so-called misleading metrics (https://beallslist.net/misleading-metrics/ ) such as OAJI and CiteFactor often used by predatory journals/publishers

-Their prominently mentioning of PubMed articles is a misleading practice (again often used by predatory journals/publishers. It is misleading since PubMed index papers where at least one of authors has a NIH grant and this is irrespective of the journal (in other words it says nothing about that particular journal)

-I checked one of their “most popular” authors and the picture they used for a certain Dr. Galyna Khrushch https://www.prof-medicina.ru/liposakciya/article/korrekciya-figuri--s-pomocshu-rf-liposakcii-body-tite is someone active in liposuction etc. but looking at Google Scholar not very active in writing serious scientific papers (actually I found none)

-See for some more arguments why one better should avoid this one my reply of August 7th , 2021 here https://www.researchgate.net/post/I-wish-to-publish-my-article-in-Journal-of-Chemistry-Education-research-and-practice-it-has-been-accepted-for-publication-but-am-not-sure-if-it-real

Best regards.

I just started in the field of computational materials, and I did the same system calculations.My SCF process is always non-converging.Hope to get your guidance.Can I read the contents of your Fe3GeTe2_JXC.inp file?

Access to articles before the journal review is typically restricted, but some journals offer preprints or early access versions. You can check the specific journal's policies.

Dear Nandisha P S ,

The journal is as indicated by Harshitha Mahesh a subscription-based journal see https://link.springer.com/journal/11814 for more information. However, the journal is originally published by a Korean Society https://www.kiche.or.kr/kjche/ and if you open the already published issues and click on one of the papers you can download the paper. Making it effectively open access.

There are more journal titles in Springer’s portfolio published this way, like for example “Journal of Biosciences” where on the Springer site https://link.springer.com/journal/12038 the papers are behind a paywall while at the original publishing site https://www.ias.ac.in/Journals/Journal_of_Biosciences/ they are effectively open access. I’ve published a paper this way:

Best regards.

PS. Because of the above ‘construction’. I presume this journal is not a so-called hybrid journal (where you can opt. for open access) like for example “The Journal of Membrane Biology” https://link.springer.com/journal/232

📷

Fig 1. A quantum particle in a 2D infinite potential well

The basis for generating an eigen or proper matrix is the 2D matrix B with 9 equidistant free nodes as shown in Figure 2, nodes 1-9.

Note that RO=0 because PE is zero.

It is expressed by the same matrix M1 explained previously in the example of 2D thermal conduction.

Compose the proper or eigen matrix M2 as given by,

M2=M1+S(x,y)

Where S(x,y ) is a diagonal matrix and S=C1*V(x,y)

The resulting eigenmatrix M2 will be given by,

Where C1 is substituted for by the factor 1/14.

The energy eigenvector E(x,y) is equal to the principal diagonal of the matrix A which gives the following eigenvector equation,

2/14 1/4 0 1/4 0 0 0 0 0

1/4 4/14 1/4 0 1/4 0 0 0 0

0 1/4 2/14 0 0 1/4 0 0 0

1/4 0 0 4/14 1/4 0 1/4 0 0

0 1/4 0 1/4 9/14 1/4 0 1/4 0

0 0 1/4 0 1/4 4/14 0 0 1/4

0 0 0 1/4 0 0 2/14 1/4 0

0 0 0 0 1/4 0 1/4 4/14 1/4

0 0 0 0 0 1/4 0 1/4 2/14

*

[2/14  4/14  2/14  4/14  9/14  4/14  2/14  4/14  2/14]T

is equal to,

[8/49 123/392 8/49 123/392 137/196 123/392 8/49 123/392 8/49] T

Showing that the energy eigenvector is=

[2/14 4/14 2/14 4/14 9/14 4/14 2/14 4/14 2/14 ] T

with a dominant eigenvalue almost equal to 1.

The reason why we multiply the nodes 1,3,6 and 9 by the factor 2 is that these nodes are located at the four intersections of the two axes x and y where the rule E=Ex+Ey applies.

The x-oriented eigenvectors and the y-oriented eigenvectors are shown in Figure 2 in black and red lines.

Dear Rukma Ramachandran As far as I can see there is this year no correct (and complete) JCR Report distributed by one of the RG members.

But since you published your paper at a trustful publisher you can fully rely on their own info:

https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/bij?distinct_id=%24device%3A18c3c1d66fbc2d-01dd760f47db2b8-49193101-13c680-18c3c1d66fbc2d&_gl=1*nidiob*_ga*Njg5MDcyNjkuMTcwMTgxNTYwOQ..*_ga_45RWY1YP1V*MTcwMTgxNTYwOS4xLjAuMTcwMTgxNTYwOS4wLjAuMA..&_ga=2.84091866.276597632.1701815609-68907269.1701815609

So, congrats with this paper.

Best regards.

Dear Rodney thank you so much.

Dear Sang woo Jung Interestingly enough both replies given to your question are either wrong or not answering your question.

The answer to your question is no you cannot add a new journal title by yourself, see https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14293139566353-Journals Here they state that only CrossRef titles will eventually be listed.

The reply by Arsalan Rasheed refers to a new phenomenon (and a means for RG to generate some money) called "Journal Home"

Though the info is correct it does not means that paying 2000 euro will get your journal title listed in the database of RG (these are two different things).

Best regards.

Sir read comments of this -https://www.linkedin.com/posts/prof-dr-amit-kumar-9a89a8a5_invitation-received-from-edwin-group-of-journals-activity-7056624478755110912-_6fd

Rahim Alijani Thank you for your comments!!

I have observed after pandemic, there are open access journals. So, editors suggest to submit in the open access journals. As a result, we are facing this issue. It can be one of the reason. Solution to this problem from my point of view:

1) Target IEEE Journals (there are fare chances of acceptance here)

2) Focus on experimental research work

3) Focus on patents based on original research work

The number of participants and their demographics could be a factor. Race and differences in cardiometabolic issues might be influencing the differences miRNA expression. Try look at the DEGs associated with the miRNAs that didn't match up, this will give you more insight into what's happening. It could be technical differences like choice of housekeeping genes, normalization process.

Yes, although they expire.

Scopus is the largest database of citations and abstracts of peer-reviewed research literature in the world, and therefore being a reviewer of Scopus magazine gives you academic standing in addition to serving you in the annual evaluation if you work in the academic field.

NAAS-RATED JOURNALS COME UNDER UGC APPROVED OR NOT.

Analytica Chimica Acta 6.2 Impact Factor

Dear Bahi Selma,

the journal and the editors are 100% fair. My manuscript had to be submitted twice. In the first round, it was rejected based on professional reviews. I improved and revised the paper, and submitted it once again. Please consider that the whole process can be relatively long. I waited 16 months since the first submission for the acceptance. Do not hesitate to submit in GEGE (Geotextiles and Geomembranes).

Regards,

Szabolcs Fischer

Dear Ilse Fouche ,

You question the legitimacy of the journal “Discovery Education” (https://link.springer.com/journal/44217 ). I have a number of papers published by Springer and the lay-out changed over the last couple of weeks/months (?), see for example:

If I recall correctly then this lay-out was first used for exclusively open access journal titles published by Springer but it is now for all their titles.

So, SpringerLink is definitely a Springer product and no sign of being predatory.

As you can see at https://link.springer.com/journal/44217 they don’t promise a 7 days turn-over time but an average “First decision” time of 7 days, meaning that the editor will decide to hand-over your manuscript for peer review or decide for desk rejection. I am pretty sure that this journal will get their indexing (Scopus, Clarivate’s ESCI etc.) pretty soon, for now one can benefit of a little launching discount https://link.springer.com/journal/44217/updates/19784724

Best regards.

PS. Their peer review time looks more than reasonable, see for example: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-023-00063-w#article-info Received 01 April 2023, Accepted 08 October 2023 and Published 18 October 2023

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-023-00065-8#article-info Received 22 May 2023, Accepted 11 October 2023 Published 16 October 2023

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-023-00050-1#article-info Received 05 June 2023, 17 August 2023, Published 04 September 2023

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-023-00044-z#article-info Received 01 March 2023, Accepted 02 August 2023, Published 15 August 2023

Etc. Etc.

Well, when I click on their homepage, I get a security alert that their website uses unsafe certificates thus banning me from accessing it from my work computer. So, even if it's not predatory, your chances of not getting read when you publish there are quite high.

Wa ale kum salam

There are two different strategies for submitting this type of work: 1) find a statistical journal that accepts more applied work or 2) find a scientific journal that finds your work of interest. What scientific, engineering, or medical problem are you trying to solve with your new method? What does your work add or provide to the community that is not addressed in the current literature? Once you know the answer to these two questions, you can better determine which journal to submit.

Please note that you wrote to the ResearchGate community, not to the RG team. You may try to contact them at https://www.researchgate.net/contact.

Several years ago, it was possible to add journal names manually. Then they changed this, although many journals are missing in RG's database. See https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14293139566353: "Due to resourcing constraints, please understand that we cannot accept requests to manually add journals to our database. Currently, we only import journal data from CrossRef. ..." - When a journal is missing in RG's database, I add the bibliographic data to the abstract field (like in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268925009 or https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344474227).

Many journals are missing in RG's database. See https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14293139566353: "Due to resourcing constraints, please understand that we cannot accept requests to manually add journals to our database. Currently, we only import journal data from CrossRef. ..." - When a journal is missing in RG's database, I add the bibliographic data to the abstract field (like in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268925009 or https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344474227).

See also this help page ("How to add research") for general instructions how to add publications to ResearchGate: https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14293005132305

It is not that easy to list a new journal on RG. If I see it right, as a user I don't even have the option. There are many important national or even international journals that RG has not inventoried. There are probably algorithmic mapping and matching procedures that decide whether and, if so, which titles are newly included.

I received the same message, same words, same objectives and same doubts.

Hello Parami

If you need to reduce your references significantly, there are some actions you can take. Here are some suggestions:

- Limit your sources for research to the last 10 years.

- Prioritize the lead authors and main studies you argue with.

- Summarize theses, findings, and insights in a result-oriented way by referring only to the most important sources.

- Consider whether you need to cite sources for commonplaces that can be assumed to be widely known.

When writing a journal paper about deep learning and image classification, there are several key aspects to focus on to ensure acceptability and quality:

By addressing these aspects and paying attention to detail, you can increase the acceptability and quality of your journal paper on deep learning and image classification. Additionally, it's important to follow the specific guidelines and requirements of the journal you plan to submit to, as they may have their own formatting and submission guidelines.

Wolfgang R. Dick Thank you

Dear Anis Hamza Stop 'polluting' RG with questions which are not yours. This question is taken from https://www.ilovephd.com/how-journal-impact-factor-h-index-calculated/

As indicated before by https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ljubomir-Jacic don't copy paste without citing the source.

Dear Fahim Arif

As you know the “Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing” (https://www.hindawi.com/journals/wcmc/about/ ) is one of the journals delisted by Clarivate from the WoS indexes ESCI, SCIE etc. see for the complete list for example here https://retractionwatch.com/2023/03/21/nearly-20-hindawi-journals-delisted-from-leading-index-amid-concerns-of-papermill-activity/ as indicated here this means and I quote “Removing a journal from Web of Science means Clarivate will no longer index its papers, count their citations, or give the title an impact factor, which can have negative effects for authors, as universities rely on such metrics to judge researchers’ work for tenure and promotion decisions. The company also suppresses journals from its yearly Journal Citation Report that publishes impact factors, as we’ve reported in the past.”

There is more bad news since the journal is also discontinued from Scopus https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/17543 if you click on “Scopus content coverage” it is clear that in 2021 the journal started to accept and publish suspiciously more papers (all caused by the introduction of more special issues).

There is however also some ‘good’ news in this matter:

-If you look at the Scopus source list (see enclosed file) and click on the tab “Discontinued title Sept. 2023” then it is clear that the coverage in Scopus stops here

Art. No. 9898169 (January 21st 2023) Retracted: Text Mining Based on the Lexicon-Constrained Network in the Context of Big Data meaning that your paper is still indexed in Scopus

-Not entirely sure how this will work with the indexing with Clarivate (I have no access to the database since I have no license) but it would not surprise me if it is more or less the same as with Scopus

-Even if the indexing in WoS does not count for your paper I think there is reason for some optimism that the journal will get the impact factor back in a reasonably short time (since the ‘problem’ is identified and the publishing partner Wiley is having a good reputation)

Hope this clarifies the matter somewhat.

Best regards.

Whether there are special mentoring programs for prospective reviewers in tourism science, I do not know ad hoc. But I would not want to rely on this, especially since there are a number of low-threshold opportunities to participate in the scientific discourse as a 'reviewer'. For instance, in each discipline there are relevant scientific journals with appropriate sections in which I can submit small independent reports and articles (such as conference reports or book reviews). Over time, I not only acquired important knowledge and gained basic experience in terms of publications and reviews, but I also slowly became noticed in the scientific community. Then it is usually only a small step to actively participate once in a regular peer review on the relevant example.

Dear Indika Wettasinghe

The published papers look in terms of lay-out highly professional, but I see a number of disturbing things:

-International Sci Ink Press Ltd (https://mdpub.net/?sec=aboutpublisher ) is the publisher of not only “International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports” but also of the very similar looking “International Journal of Surgery and Medicine” (https://www.ejos.org/index.php ) and a unsuccessful journal titled “International Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Food Sciences” (https://www.agropub.net )

-Contact info (57 Antim I str., Vazrazhdane, Sofia, 1303, Bulgaria) leads to well … not Sofia’s finest neighborhood

-The owner/editor published a suspiciously large number of papers in his own journal(s) see research items here https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ivan-Inkov

-The journal management system eJM (eJManager) is mentioned in the Beall’s list (https://beallslist.net ), see also https://forbetterscience.com/2023/01/25/the-pullulating-polyps-of-omics/ where eJM was discussed not that positively

-Indexing info https://mdpub.net/index.php?sec=jindex mentions ESJI and ASI examples of so-called misleading metrics (https://beallslist.net/misleading-metrics/ )

-Not sure where some found the info about their impact factor but be clear this journal (https://mdpub.net ) has NO impact factor (simply because they are not indexed in Clarivate’s ESCI/SCIE or SSCI index, which can be checked here https://mjl.clarivate.com/home )

-The same is true for Scopus, they are NOT indexed in Scopus which can be checked here https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri?zone=TopNavBar&origin=searchbasic and not indexed in PubMed (or PMC)

So not sure whether predatory is the right word but the lack of any serious indexing would for me personally mean: avoid this one.

Best regards.

A good peer reviewer displays efficient behaviors and adds value to the process. The good thing about a reviewer who does bad things is that they can change. There are quite a few ways to shift bad behaviors and habits of reviewers to become not just good, but great peer reviewers...

Hello Pedro Goncalves

It sounds to me that the editor of that particular journal was slow to start with. Are there other journals in the same topic that might also be suitable if this remains problematic?

Here are some journals that are known for their contributions to software engineering:

Elsevier Journals:

Journal of Systems and Software (JSS): JSS publishes research articles and reviews on software systems and software engineering. It covers a wide range of topics in the field and typically has a reasonable review process.

Journal Link: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-systems-and-software

Information and Software Technology (IST): IST focuses on the practical aspects of software engineering and covers topics such as software development, maintenance, and management.

Journal Link: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/information-and-software-technology

Empirical Software Engineering (EMSE): EMSE publishes empirical studies and research on software engineering practices, making it a valuable resource for researchers in this area.

Journal Link: https://www.springer.com/journal/10664

Springer Journals:

Software Quality Journal: This journal focuses on software quality assurance, testing, and measurement. It often features research on improving software quality practices.

Journal Link: https://www.springer.com/journal/11219

Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development (JSERD): JSERD publishes original research articles on various aspects of software engineering, including development methodologies and tools.

Journal Link: https://www.springer.com/journal/11219

Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM): SoSyM is an international journal that covers modeling techniques and tools in software and systems engineering.

Journal Link: https://www.springer.com/journal/10270

Please keep in mind that the response times for journal submissions can vary depending on factors such as the journal's workload, the complexity of the review process, and the specific area of research. To get the most accurate and up-to-date information on response times, it's recommended to visit the journal websites and review their submission guidelines. Additionally, you can consider contacting the editorial boards or editors-in-chief of these journals for inquiries regarding response times and publication schedules.

the editor in a analytical chemistry journal accepted this after changing the title to highlight the new investigations and findings. best

Seyyed Morteza Hashemi Toroujeni I may be able to assist, pro-bono (free) with acknowledgment, but not as a co-author. Co-authorship without a research contribution would not be appropriate. Please check my profile and message me.

Cheers,

Leo

Dear Ashraf Magableh As indicated by Wolfgang R. Dick (re)claim the paper:

Best regards.

see. -

many other publications