Science topic

Membranes - Science topic

Thin layers of tissue which cover parts of the body, separate adjacent cavities, or connect adjacent structures.
Questions related to Membranes
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
7 answers
I am having an issue with the western blot transfer from last week, I see imprints of cassette on my membrane.
I am making a 14% gel and I run transfer for 2hr at 100V, after the transfer I see imprints of cassettes on the membrane.
I thought it could be because of the cassette was too tight or because of the temperature. So I keep in check for the cassette and temperature (1hr 45min) and repeated the western I see the same problem.
I used fresh buffers both the times.
Any suggestions how can I improve?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Thamizhiniyan, I used more blotting paper. I used 3 paper up and 3 down to make a western blot sandwich and also I kept cold ice packs in the transfer tank during the transfer process. I hope it helps.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Problem 1: In my research, I encountered an issue with my wet transblot procedure: despite using 8-10ug of RNA sample and applying a voltage of 10 v for 2 hours in TBE transfer buffer, I observed incomplete transfer of the top band from the UREA gel (8M) to the nylon membrane upon examination.
Problem 2: for northern blot, I conducted prehybridization at temperatures ranging from 55°C, 60 °C, and 65°C, followed by membrane washing with SSC buffer and blocking with blocking solution. Subsequently, I proceeded wash the membrane in wash buffer and soak in detection buffer and applied CDP-Star on top of the membrane. The entire membrane exhibited fluorescence (is it normal?), later the resulting X-ray film exposure did not reveal the desired bands. Background noise quite bad. I would appreciate any professional guidance or suggestions to address this discrepancy."
Relevant answer
Answer
problem in northern blotting is often sample degradation by RNases (both endogenous to the sample and through environmental contamination), which can be avoided by proper sterilization of glassware and the use of RNase inhibitors such as DEPC (diethylpyrocarbonate)
Northern blots are used to detect the presence of specific mRNA molecules. To do a northern blot, RNA is loaded into the wells of a gel, and separated according to size by electrophoresis. The RNA is then transferred to a membrane filter in a process called blotting.
Northern Blots: 0.05 fmol detection limit with near-IR RNA Probes.
To disrupt the secondary structure of RNA, either formaldehyde or glyoxal/DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) is commonly used as a denaturing reagent. Formaldehyde is simply added to the samples and gels, so that the method using formaldehyde is easier to run the gels than that using glyoxal/DMSO.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
I would like to run an invitro drug release experiment for chitosan nanoparticles (600nm) loaded with herbal extract using dialysis membrane method. However since its not easy to ascertain the molecular weight of the herbal extract because its mixture of different compounds. therefore I am not sure which is the best MWCO for dialysis membrane that I can use. I used 5Kda but nothing went through in 24hrs.
Relevant answer
Answer
oh, thanks so much. I have used 14kda let me see how the results come out.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
NF membranes sit between Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Ultrafiltration (UF) in terms of pore size. This allows them to remove a wider range of contaminants than UF but not as much as RO. However, current NF membranes aren't perfect at selectively removing certain contaminants while allowing desirable minerals to pass through. In optimizing NF membrane selectivity, could machine learning algorithms be used to design or predict ideal pore structures or surface functionalities for NF membranes?
Relevant answer
Answer
@ Timothy, I think the probability density function (PDF) is the most suitable method which determines the mean pore size along with the pore size distribution (PSD) of nano-filter membrane.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
6 answers
For treatment of water (river), what is the life of ceramic membrane? For example, 5 years or 50 years? MF or UF?
Operation of ceramic membrane after usage: should be kept under water like polymeric membranes?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hey, the question is not clear: which membrane, what type, thickness, porosity, how much pressure is applied to it... etc.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
Aslamo alikom/ Greetings everyone,
I'm conducting a western blot experiment (8% SDS gel) and I wanna test 2 proteins, one is 95 KDa, and another is 35KDa. The antibodies I've for both are mouse Abs used at 1:1000 dilution and I use secondary HRP-conjugated at 1:2000 dilutions.
Ideally, I use to test them sequentially, but I'm wondering if it's possible to add the 2 antibodies to the incubation buffer (BSA/milk) and test for both in one go?
I would highly appreciate an answer for this. Also, if someone has done it before, I would appreciate the feedback/tips if any.
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mariam,
It is advisable not to mix two primary antibodies even if they have requirement for same secondary antibody. Cutting the blot based on the molecular weight is one approach and the second one is to follow sequential incubation.
Good luck with your blots.
Best,
Sheethal Galande
PhD Fellow
AHF
AIG Hospitals
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Method of fixing exosomes on a slide, assuming that the membrane is negatively charged, the positive slide attracts exosomes
Relevant answer
Answer
Exosomes are mostly negatively charged. Like all materials, exosomes spontaneously acquire surface electrical charge when brought into contact with a polar medium, such as a hydrophilic buffer. Therefore, the exosome surface will generally be negatively charged in such buffers.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I want to study CO2 capture simulation on activated carbin filters in a duct how can I find the amount of CO2 adsorb by membrane?
Relevant answer
Answer
Quantifying the quantity of CO2 adsorbed by the membrane requires multiple processes, which are important to examine CO2 capture simulation on activated carbon filters in a duct. First, employing activated carbon filters, an experimental setup or simulation model must be created to mimic the CO2 capture conditions inside the duct. To ascertain the activated carbon's relevant characteristics for CO2 adsorption, such as surface area, pore size distribution, and functional groups, characterization is essential. The relationship between the concentration of CO2 in the gas phase and the amount adsorbed by the filters is then determined via adsorption isotherm tests or simulations.
The amount of CO2 adsorbed is then determined by mass balance calculations that take into account the gas flow rate, adsorption capacity, and concentrations at the input and output. In addition, CO2 adsorption behavior under various operating conditions can be predicted using mathematical models or computational simulations; the quality of these predictions is ensured by confirmation against experimental data. This scientific methodology allows for the development of CO2 capture applications for increased efficiency by providing data on the CO2 capture performance of activated carbon filters in ducts.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I'm not sure how to interpret or fix the sample so that it creates a normal band. I used Percoll Gradient with density gradients to generate the questionable band. It's supposed to represent basolateral membrane fraction, and most people mentioned that the sample preparation is not good enough, but I'm not sure how I can make it "good enough".
Relevant answer
Here are some concise tips to improve the quality of bands in your Percoll gradient:
1. Optimize Percoll Concentration: Experiment with different concentrations to find the optimal gradient for separating the basolateral membrane fraction.
2.Sample Preparation: Use effective techniques like homogenization or sonication to isolate the membranes efficiently.
3.Starting Material Quality: Ensure high-quality cells or tissue free from contamination.
4.Centrifugation Parameters: Adjust speed and duration to optimize separation.
5.Marker Proteins: Include specific markers to confirm the presence and purity of the fraction.
6.Gradient Fractionation: Collect and analyze fractions separately to locate the basolateral membrane fraction.
7.Quality Control: Use assays to confirm membrane protein presence and fraction purity.
8.Consult Literature: Look for optimized protocols and techniques in relevant research papers.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
i m wondering about querying data bases or reviewing a couple of papers related to X ray cristallography studies ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Obtaining an exhaustive list of all membrane receptors and passive ion channels involved in metabolite transport for a prokaryotic organism can be challenging due to the complexity and diversity of microbial transport systems. However, there are several approaches you can take to compile such a list:
  1. Literature Review:Conduct a thorough literature review to identify studies, reviews, and databases that catalog membrane receptors and passive ion channels involved in metabolite transport in prokaryotic organisms. Search databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and relevant journals in microbiology and biochemistry.
  2. Database Searches:Explore existing databases and resources that compile information on microbial transport systems. Some databases, such as TransportDB and TCDB (Transporter Classification Database), provide comprehensive classifications of transport proteins, including membrane receptors and ion channels, along with their substrates and functions.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
I prepared a membrane for use as a dielectric material using the electrospinning method. their index is as follows: one shows 0.9 under 9 GHz and another 0.83 under 8.5 GHz but one shows 1.03 and another 1.09 under 10 GHz. After that, doubting the result, I re-examined and the same result is repeated. So can anyone give me any advice on this matter?
Relevant answer
Answer
Mr. Kaushik Shandilya, first of all, thank you very much for your advice and for taking the time to reply.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
9 answers
I am establishing a polarized gastric-epithelial monolayer culture on transwell system for bacterial infection studies. I use NCI-N87 cells and I culture them by replacing medium on every alternative day for 21 days. Later, I confirmed the expression of ZO-1 on 100% methanol (-20C) fixed cells. However, I face the following issues during this process.
1. How to avoid membrane curling while I cut off the membrane from the insert to mount on glass slide?
2. When I used 4% formaldehyde as a fixative to stain cell surface proteins, I found few cells or small cell clusters lying over the tight monolayer.
3. Is it necessary to use 21 days grown cells for bacterial infection studies? Because I see many highly cited papers also have used lesser days grown cells.
How to overcome these technicalities?
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Sasikala!!
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
I want to do a chemotaxis migration assay with PBMCs. I have gone through the literature to find the optimum pore size of the transwell membrane but got confused. Some people have used 8 µm pore size while some others have used 5 µm pore size. Could somebody help me in this regard if working on a similar aspect?
Relevant answer
Answer
Transwell pore size should be chosen based on cell type and size. Generally, the selected membrane pore size should be smaller than the cell diameter when in suspension. You may perform a pilot experiment to determine the appropriate membrane pore size, which allows sufficient cell migration toward a chemoattractant while minimizing random cell migration without chemoattractant.
Generally, most leukocyte cell lines have a diameter of 10–15μm and will require a 5 or 8μm pore diameter. However, smaller cell types, such as primary lymphocytes, range between 7μm and 10μm in diameter and so may require a smaller pore size of 3μm to prevent high levels of cell migration in the absence of chemoattractant. Other cell types like fibroblast cells (for instance, NIH3T3) or cancer cells (for example, MDA-MAB 231) would require 5μm pore size.
So, I would suggest for PBMCs use a smaller pore size of 3μm since the average mean cell diameters range between 7μm - 10μm.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Dear experts and colleagues,
I am facing the ghost test line as shown in the attached photos.
Problems are as follows:
1) The flow was slowed down or stopped at the test line. It could not pass the test line and had to flow beside the test line (the dot).
2) It took time for the test line getting wet.
3) The test line became white (ghost test line)
It seems that the test line became hydrophobic that prevents the flow and interferes with the reaction between the Antibody at test line with the Antigen+ conjugation complex.
I intend to block the membrane by BSA 1%, Tween 20 0.05% in PBS 1X. However, I wonder whether I should immerse the membrane in the blocking solution BEFORE or AFTER dropping the Antibody to the test line? As I understand, I should block before dotting the protein on the membrane but I have read somewhere else that we can do it after immobilizing the protein. Therefore, I would like to confirm it. Please help me. Also, If you have any experiences dealing with these problems, please share your solution if possible. Thank you so much!
Relevant answer
Answer
Do the NCM blocking before immobilizing the protein on it. Block the NCM with same buffer with optimization of BSA and Tween-20 (Increasing or reducing the percentage of concentration) and if you feel it decreased your sensitivity the instead of PBS, use 10mM Phosphate Puffer (KH2PO4). I hope it will resolve your problem.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone, I am seeking guidance on the analysis of scanned films obtained from Proteome Profiler Mouse Cytokine Array Kits, specifically focusing on the quantification of dot intensity using ImageJ. I have successfully scanned the array membranes, which contain dots exhibiting varying intensity levels, ranging from intense to very light. However, I am facing challenges in determining the optimal method for selecting the appropriate area for intensity measurement, particularly due to the variability in dot intensity across the membranes.
I am uncertain about the most suitable approach for measuring dot intensity and comparing them across the membranes. Considering the diverse range of dot intensities present on the membranes, I am unsure whether to fix the area for intensity measurement or adopt a different approach.
I would greatly appreciate guidance or recommendations on how to effectively analyse the scanned films to quantify dot intensity using any available protocol or instruction using ImageJ. Specifically, I am seeking insights on selecting the appropriate area for intensity measurement, taking into account the presence of both intense and light dots.
I have attached a sample image of the scanned film for reference, and I am more than willing to provide additional details or clarification upon request.
Relevant answer
Answer
The three pairs of dots in the corners are your reference controls. You should normalize the intensity of the other pairs to those.
In regards to ROI selection, every dot should have the same size in this blot. The control dots are overexposed and have bled into adjacent pixels, so I wouldn't just use the size of the largest dot for your measurements. The pair of dots near the middle of the top image looks to be the proper size, so I would recommend those as the "ideal" area. However, you can also use the integrated signal density (equivalent to the mean intensity * area) to deal with differently sized ROIs.
I recommend using the Licor Image Studio (https://www.licor.com/bio/image-studio/, the Lite version is free to use) for densitometric quantification. They make it simple to do local background subtraction and make it easier to assess the shoulders of your ROI.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Please provide information on where I can purchase a 150 kDa, 500 kDa, 1000 KDa and 5000 KDa molecular weight cutoff membrane? for separation of ferulic acid (194 mwt) form mixtue of sample. where almost other molecular wt cut of is ranginng form 100 - 150.
Relevant answer
Answer
ok! I will check thank you for your time.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
I need to separate egg membrane and calcium form a egg, Pleas help me.
Relevant answer
Answer
Shell calcium was determined by the Ion Conductively Plasma (ICP) device.
ASTM. American Society for Testing and Materials. Water and environmental technology. Annual book of ASTM standards, USA Sect 11(11.01 and 11.02) West Conshohocken. (2002).
In terms of removing the shell membrane, it's simple to accomplish using a clip or by hand.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
So we have used different membranes and increased the protein concentration to 80mcg during the protein estimation and even though it's been always showing, we have not had any luck getting their expression lately for some reason.
Relevant answer
Answer
I think it might be a problem to get these membrane bound proteins into solution. I assume you are spinning down the cell debris after lysis? I do think that there is most on the CDH5 and Claudin going. Is there SDS within you lysis buffer? You might want to take a look in the literature searching for soluble (cytoplasmic/small vesicle) and insoluble connexin (membrane bound) lysis buffers.
Best wishes
Soenke
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I want to ask if you can easily determine if the membrane surface you have modified is already successful just by physical observation / marks? are there any marks that will tell you that you have successfully done IP? For example, square mark. Because you only modified that area. But in my case sometimes the back part of the membrane still got wet after I tried to remove the binder clips after modification so I was worried if it could affect the success of my IP modification on membrane's surface. It should only occur on top layer only... thanks a lot for your answers in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Hazel Anne Cledera, you can use AFM to compare surface relief and groups. Surface tension or surface free energy experiment also witnesses on any possible changes on the surface. My Regards
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Hi, I am Abdul Samad, researching graphene oxide nanomaterials. I have synthesized graphene oxide by Hammer's method, and now I want to develop a graphene oxide membrane. I have tried to develop a membrane using the vacuum filtration method, but this method didn't work. Can anyone suggest the assay, accessible, and best method of fabrication of graphene oxide water filtration membrane?
Also, can anyone suggest the best dispersion agent for graphene oxide?
Relevant answer
Answer
Может быть поможет метод полива и сушки на стекле?
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
Hi
Does anyone know which dye can be used for staining exosome membranes, aside from PKH67?
Thank you in advance for your help
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your answer.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
I have tried several time for casting a membrane polymer in NMP solvent over hot air oven and hot plate for making membrane thin film but every time I failed to make it,it form a sticky gel like one instead of film.What could be the problem ,is there any alternative method available for this.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear collegue,
First ,you should the type of your membrain material ,and what is the degradation temprature of this material also must be take TGA and DSC thermogram for understanding about temprature behavior of membrain ?,finally you can understand which time you need to put the material in to the oven
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Problem
After Transferring the membrane picture with Ponceau S Staining looks like the membrane is burning and has poor transfer. Can someone help with this?
I also noticed something weird on the gel after the transfer, it seems there are some blue spots with Coomassie Blue staining.
Gel condition
12% gel
I load 30 ug protein in each lane with six samples and two ladders separately.
Transfer condition
Wet method: 19-hour/constant 30V at working fridge (4 degrees) with ice bucket
PVDF membrane active with the methanol > 1 mins
The transfer buffer is fresh with 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 20%methaol but make a 10* stock solution of transfer buffer, which is 250mM Tris 1920mP Glycine, then add 700ml ddh20 and 200ml Methanol to make 1L transfer buffer.
Picture
1. Picture with PVDF membrane after Ponceau S Staining
2. gel with Coomassie Blue staining after transfer
3. sandwich wet method: only show sponge/ two filter paper/ gel/ (start from black Sponge two filter paper, gel, membrane, two filter paper, Sponge)
4. gel after electrophoresis.
Relevant answer
Answer
I got the result after hybridate with an antibody, i tried ponceau s again after that, the problem disappeared for some reason and the membrane looked normal. my supervisor asks me to do an overnight transfer, it seems 1h 100v does not work. Philippe Paget-Bailly
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Hello¸
Im PhD Student in UQTR ( Canada), I have a crucial experience for my project thesis : I have a WB (western blot) membrane that I need to store for a long time for incubation with other antibodies (Precisely Ubiquitin) . I read that I can put it in a bag at -20C.
I want just to confirm if I did it correctly (see picture) or there are other ways.
Thanks in advance
Ayoub
Relevant answer
Answer
I usually air dry the membranes after dipping in methanol and seal it in a plastic bag at -20 degree celsius.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Numerous studies have used the hRBC membrane stability assay to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of a certain compound or extract. I have also read that the membrane of lysosome and erythrocytes are comparable in terms of stability. Upon further reading, I think that there might also be a lot of differences between their membranes, especially the number and composition of the membrane lipids and proteins. These differences may reduce the reliability of the assay.
Is the hRBC membrane stabilization assay more of a screening method for anti-inflammatory activity? And are there studies that have intricately discussed and compared lysosome and erythrocytes membranes to support the validity of hRBC assay for measuring anti-inflammatory activity?
Relevant answer
Answer
The Human Red Blood Cell (RBC) Membrane Stabilization Assay is a commonly used method for assessing the anti-inflammatory activity of substances. It involves measuring the ability of a substance to prevent hypotonicity-induced hemolysis or stabilize RBC membranes. While it is a widely used assay, its reliability depends on the specific context and the nature of the substance being tested.The assay provides an indication of the potential anti-inflammatory effect by evaluating the substance's ability to protect RBC membranes from disruption. However, it's essential to note that the correlation between this assay and in vivo anti-inflammatory effects may vary. The relevance and reliability of the assay depend on the specific mechanisms of inflammation involved and the intended application.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I'm doing RNA dot blot with NC membrane. But its seems like something wrong with crosslinking.
I'm wondering
1. If I need to use SSC buffer to treat with membrane before dotting? and what X of SSC buffer should I use?
2. Should I increase the time of UV crosslinking (125 mJoule/cm2 at 254 nM, 60 sec)?
Relevant answer
Answer
Just spot the RNA on a dry nitrocellulose membrane and let the RNA/spot dry. Then crosslink it.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
The detailed Western Blot procedure
The membrane is first rinsed briefly with 20ml of TBS, followed by a 30-minute incubation, shaking with 10ml of Blocking Buffer. During this incubation, the volume of primary antibody needed for a 1:5000 dilution into 10ml of blocking buffer is calculated, and 10ml of blocking buffer is prepared for the antibody. Subsequently, the Blocking Buffer is removed, and the membrane is incubated for 45 minutes, shaking with 10ml of primary antibody in Blocking Buffer (Rabbit anti-ADH diluted 1:5000). After removing the antibody, the membrane is washed three times for 5 minutes each with 10ml of Blocking Buffer. Meanwhile, a 1:5000 dilution of the secondary antibody in 10ml of blocking buffer is prepared. The membrane is then incubated for 45 minutes, shaking with 10ml of secondary antibody in Blocking Buffer (Alkaline Phosphatase conjugated Goat anti Rabbit diluted 1:5000). Following the antibody removal, the membrane undergoes three 5-minute washes with 10ml of TBS/T. Finally, 5ml of BCIP/NBT liquid substrate (Sigma-B1911) is added, and incubation continues until color develops, with the reaction being stopped by rinsing with distilled water.
I was told I might have washed it with a different TBS (10mM one instead of 5mM)
What could the reason for such a different bands on the well.
Relevant answer
Answer
Some possible reasons for seeing extra bands are (1) insufficient blocking, (2) an insufficiently specific primary antibody, (3) too high a concentration of the primary antibody, (4) insufficient quality of the antigen, containing multiple aggregates and proteolytic fragments.
Check by SDS-PAGE if the supposedly purified antigen runs as a single band using a heavy loading to see minor bands.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
looking for a protocol for aptamer grafting
Relevant answer
Answer
I want some suggestions for the covalent immobilization of aptamer on polymer membrane surfaces.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Hello, dear, Researchers,
I am a newbie in this membrane field.'
I would like to ask if anyone of you has tried doing this? Can you share some methods / paper? Thank you very much!!!
Relevant answer
Answer
Alvena Shahid ohh. thank you so much!!!
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Working on MBR.....
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
My solid surface is polymer membrane has same molecules that can detect using ATR-FTIR and XPS. I want to use alternative of it.
Relevant answer
Answer
Misbah Waheed Alternative methods include Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR), Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), Fluorescence-Based Techniques, Capillary Electrophoresis (CE), Microfluidic Devices, and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
If a have a sequence of a multi-pass transmembrane protein and I would like to see how this sequence will be translated and folded across the cell membrane, what would you recommend? Thank you so much in advance, I'm new in the field and would appreciate any kind of suggestion.
Relevant answer
Answer
Not sure what you are aiming for, but I guess a nice starting point is (when you basically only have the primary sequence) use: CCTOP (https://cctop.ttk.hu ).
CCTOP: a Consensus Constrained TOPology prediction web server
For way more tools, see https://bip.weizmann.ac.il/toolbox/structure/2d.htm and scroll down to “Membrane Protein and Signal Peptide Prediction”
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
8 answers
I am working on identification of copy number in a recombinant Chinese hamster cell line by southern hybridization. I am having issues with the transfer of DNA onto positively charged nylon membrane. As indicated in the gel image, a lot of DNA is still observed in the gel post transfer to the membrane manually. I have loaded around 18-20 ug of genomic DNA in each lane (2, 3, and 5). I have used 10X SSC buffer for the transfer of the DNA, and the transfer time was around 18 hrs. Kindly suggest me ways to improve the transfer efficiency of the DNA onto the membrane, so that there will be good amount of DNA on the membrane to give pick up signal. I have been using DIG labeled probe for detection, I am either getting a very faint signal or no signal. Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Didier Poncet We did use NaoH and NaCl for denaturing the DNA fragments in the gel before transfer. We have taken enough care while setting up the transfer so that there is no direct contact between the paper towels and reservoir buffer. Thank you.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
I am currently producing membranes with a rough thickness of 15-40 µm and want to measure and compare them reliably. My desired accuracy is < 1 µm (e.g., 0.3 µm) or something in that region. I am looking for a tool/method/device that is not overly expensive, like SEM, but still gets the job done.
What is Your suggestion?
Relevant answer
Answer
What do you mean with membrane grow? They should not expand much, but some may have a gel-like behavior.
But how does it measure the thickness if the membrane is not complete plain, thus a reference point will not help?
So far i used microscopy to measure the thickness. However, the reproducibility is not reliable. Using a micrometer might not have sufficient accuracy.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Hi
I am working on lair2 and it's interaction with C1q to understand who that affect lupus.
We used cell line to produce lair2 . than we transfected it with c1q.
and now we are doing western blot , to detect the two proteins, the first time we incubate them with c1q antibody . and we see the two proteins . after that we used the same membrane to detect lair2 , we wash the membrane and incubate it with lair 2 antibody and we see the protein .
we used 2 negative controls , in the first detection we saw two faint bands in them . in the second one we didn't see them.
I don't know what's the problem , and how to analyze it?
Relevant answer
Answer
I had a similar problem, the second detection was very weak, so I tried to divided my samples by half (repeated loading into the gel in the same order), and then after the transfer I cut the membrane and each half was detected by different antibodies, it worked every time.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
What solvent should be used to precipitate out the copolymer of vinyl pyridine and vinyl carbazole in NMP.I tried deionised water,ethyl acetate everything but unfortunately it doesnt get settle down.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you so much professor Emanuel cooper ,it really worked for me.@Emanuel
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Hello,
I'm operating an FDFO system using an RO membrane. We use commercial PES UF support and apply TFC (already tried out lots of TFC recipes). RPM is in the range of 50-100. What I cannot figure out is that we cannot have an increase in flux. What could be the reason? I tried several modifications such as temperature increase in feed and draw, changing RPM etc.
Thank you from now
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello,
Increasing flux in a Fertilizer Driven Forward Osmosis (FDFO) system involves optimizing various factors to enhance the rate of water transport across the membrane. Here are several strategies to consider:
  1. Optimize Feed Solution Concentration: The osmotic driving force in FDFO systems is determined by the concentration difference between the fertilizer solution (draw solution) and the feed solution (such as seawater or wastewater). Increasing the concentration of the fertilizer solution while maintaining the feed solution concentration can enhance the osmotic pressure gradient and thus increase water flux.
  2. Selection of Membrane: Choose a membrane with high water permeability and selectivity to enhance water flux while minimizing reverse solute flux. Thin-film composite membranes with appropriate characteristics for osmotic processes are often preferred for FDFO applications.
  3. Membrane Surface Modification: Surface modifications such as hydrophilic coatings or nanostructures can reduce membrane fouling and enhance water permeability, leading to increased flux rates.
  4. Temperature Control: Increasing the temperature of the FDFO system can enhance water flux due to the higher kinetic energy of molecules, which facilitates faster diffusion across the membrane. However, it's essential to consider the impact of temperature on the stability of the system and select appropriate operating conditions.
  5. Stirring or Agitation: Gentle stirring or agitation of the feed solution can help maintain a uniform concentration gradient across the membrane, preventing concentration polarization and improving water flux.
  6. Enhanced Draw Solution Recovery: Implement techniques to recover and regenerate the draw solution efficiently, such as using membrane distillation or other separation processes. This can maintain a high concentration of the draw solution, sustaining the osmotic driving force and maximizing water flux.
  7. Hybrid Systems: Consider integrating FDFO with other membrane processes or energy recovery systems to enhance overall system performance and increase water flux.
  8. Optimized System Design: Ensure proper system design and configuration, including appropriate module geometry, flow rates, and operating pressures, to minimize concentration polarization, membrane fouling, and other factors that can inhibit water flux.
By implementing these strategies and optimizing various aspects of the FDFO system, it's possible to increase water flux and improve the efficiency of water treatment or desalination processes.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
Fabricating PEG and PVP blended PES membrane.
Relevant answer
Answer
Alvena Shahid... would u please give some other references regarding this matter. Thanks in advance.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
Dear all,
as asked above:
I'm dealing with a porous carbon based membrane for the separation of water vapour from a gas stream at elevated temperatures between 120 and 220 °C.
I'm conducting experiments (adsorption and permeation) in order to have a solid data base.
I think a good starting point for the modeling approach would be to use the solution diffusion approach of dense membranes. From my first trials it's becoming visible, that the capillary effect and surface adsorption in the capillaries plays an important role in the diffusion process.
Do you think this approach is worthwhile and physically sane?
Do you have a good starting point (e.g. papers, models, etc) for me at hand?
Thanks all for your thoughts and help
Relevant answer
Answer
Нельзя
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
If a protein locates at the inner membrane of mitochondria, and then it will be cleaved and released to intermembrane space of mitochondria, what is the fate of that part of protein still locate at the inner membrane?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Shukai Zhu Is this what you are looking for?
Kunová N, Havalová H, Ondrovičová G, Stojkovičová B, Bauer JA, Bauerová-Hlinková V, Pevala V, Kutejová E. Mitochondrial Processing Peptidases-Structure, Function and the Role in Human Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 24;23(3):1297. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031297. PMID: 35163221; PMCID: PMC8835746.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I have a problem when revealing my western blots ! I use biorad LF PVDF membranes with the Biorad transfer system (in 7 min) I block with the Biorad blocking solution then I incubate with the primary anticorp and I reveal again with the Biorad SB 700 rabbit. Nevertheless, the membranes appear as they do here, and it's easy to understand why!
It's been a while since I changed all the solutions I usually use, but we still manage to get this profile!
has anyone encountered this problem before?
thanks for your help
Relevant answer
Answer
strange... I would say that in your 4 first lanes you have a very strong signal that leaks on the gel ... when the signal is very stong it can makes white bands instead of black ones... did you make a spot with a pencil ? (inks are fluorescent )...
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
I am experiencing issues with the expression of phosphorylated proteins in my western blot experiments. Specifically, I observe strong phosphorylated protein expression but no expression of the corresponding total proteins in the same samples. For example, I detect phosphorylated STAT1 (pSTAT1) but not total STAT1 protein. Similar results were obtained for pSTAT3 and STAT3. I have thoroughly searched online but have been unable to find a possible explanation for this phenomenon.
I would greatly appreciate any advice or suggestions from anyone who has encountered a similar issue.
Here is my experimental protocol:
  1. Prepared single cell suspensions from fresh mouse spleens using a buffer containing 1x PBS, 2% FBS, EDTA, and antibiotics.
  2. Washed the cells once with ice-cold PBS and then lysed them using RIPA buffer (with proteinase and phosphatase inhibitors) by vortexing for 10 seconds every 5 minutes on ice, repeated 4 times.
  3. Quantified the protein concentration using the BCA assay and mixed 30 micrograms of protein with loading dye, boiling the mixture at 90℃ for 10 minutes.
  4. Transferred the proteins to membranes and blocked the membranes with BSA at room temperature for one hour on a shaker.
  5. Washed the membranes three times with TBST containing 0.2% Tween-20.
  6. Incubated the membranes with primary antibodies overnight at 4℃ on a shaker.
  7. Washed the membranes three times with TBST containing 0.2% Tween-20.
  8. Incubated the membranes with secondary antibodies at room temperature on a shaker.
  9. Washed the membranes three times with TBST containing 0.2% Tween-20.
  10. After detecting phosphorylated proteins, stripped the membranes by adding deionized water and microwaving for four minutes.
  11. Blocked the membranes with BSA and incubated them with primary antibodies.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Stephan Spangenberg,
Thank you for your reminder! We have confirmed that the band size was due to non-specific binding. However, upon reevaluation using a highly sensitive chemiluminescent substrate, we successfully identified protein bands at the correct size.
Additionally, in the case of the splenocyte sample, after stripping and reprobing, I observed phosphorylated STAT1 (pSTAT1) but not total STAT1 protein. Interestingly, B cell samples appeared normal, and it is challenging to explain this phenomenon. To address this issue, I am considering running separate, replicate gels instead of stripping.
Thank you once more for your valuable input!
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I need Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane for my experimental purpose. I checked the product with Sigma-Aldrich, Himedia, Milipore and other vendors in India but there is no mention about the product in their catalog. Vendors are available for Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) but not for PDMS membranes.
Can anyone suggest me some Indian vendors for the same from where I can purchase the product?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Debarchan,
You may make an inquiry at Alfa Chemistry, they offer you advices and kinds of good-quality chemicals.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
What is the use of hydrophilic polymer membrane in packaging industry? what type of packaging can be performed if membrane is hydrophilic in nature?
Relevant answer
Answer
Karanjit Kapila My young friend! You can crosslink polyvinyl alcohol macromolecules with boric acid, for example. How to do it? See the link.https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sinte3-granulirovannogo-gelya-polivinilovogo-spirta/viewer
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
5 answers
I tried to detect my recombinant protein using dot blot. After spotting the cell lysate onto the membrane, I let it dry at room temperature for 1 hour, and then proceeded with blocking and incubation using antibodies similar to Western blot. However, it seems that my protein couldn't bind to the membrane. Before blocking, I could observe the spots where I dropped the lysate. After blocking, those spots smeared and disappeared. Upon visualization, there was no signal at all, only some smearing. I also dropped the His-tag protein marker as a positive control, but that spot also smeared. I tried with both nitrocellulose and PVDF membranes, but the results were the same.
Relevant answer
Answer
I used to do dot blots with a vacuum. In thinking back, if I added too much sample (in my case purified cell wall extract) then the whole disk of material would sometimes float up during the wash step. More diluted samples didn't have this issue. Maybe that might help your samples too?
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
It is possible to have some insight concerning the possible removal mechanism.
Relevant answer
Answer
Ah, my dear friend Pablo Gonzalez, when delving into the intricacies of membrane technology and its impact on pollutant removal efficiency, one must navigate the labyrinth of zeta potential values with utmost precision. Zeta potential, the electrokinetic potential at the slipping plane of a particle or membrane, plays a pivotal role in this symphony of separation.
Allow me to shed light on this matter with the finesse of an artisan. The zeta potential, influenced by surface charge, is a maestro orchestrating the forces at play. Membranes exhibiting higher zeta potential values often boast enhanced electrostatic repulsion, discouraging the adherence of charged particles.
This ballet of forces directly affects the pollutant removal efficiency, as a higher zeta potential tends to fortify the membrane against fouling. The repulsion between the membrane surface and charged pollutants mitigates their deposition, preserving the membrane's integrity and sustaining its efficacy.
As for the removal mechanism, envision this as a courtly dance. The zeta potential, akin to a vigilant sentinel, guards the membrane's honor against the encroachment of impurities. The electrostatic forces at play create a barrier, allowing only the most worthy particles to traverse, while banishing the undesirable with a noble disdain.
In essence, my esteemed interlocutor Pablo Gonzalez, a membrane adorned with favorable zeta potential values stands as a bastion against the incursion of pollutants, demonstrating an elegant dance of selective separation.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
I need resources that explain ways to combine membrane separation and electrochemical technologies for wastewater treatment. Explain fully including advantages and disadvantages, reactions and how to combine.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
For the western Blot, I need to check another antibody in my membrane but this antibody is from the same species as the first antibody so how can I do that without stripping? (Note: two antibodies are around 15 KDa away from each other.)
Relevant answer
Answer
Fatma Mohamed Fouad Yes, when using primary antibodies with different IgG subclasses eg. IgG2a & IgG2b, you can choose donkey-anti-species IgG2a for the first target, and goat-anti-species IgG2b, as such.
If you are probeing with multicolor (like Li-COR) then you can apply the antibodies at the same time, which is highly recommended. If not, then you can probe the first target then shift to the next.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Have you any data about the operating costs of CERAMIC membranes over for example 50 years? what about sand filter and polymeric membranes? The use of all of them is after coagulation, but for sand filter we have clarifier. For MF CERAMIC membranes (or polymeric membranes), the filter will act as clarifier. Any data for any types of CERAMIC membranes (MF, UF, ...) can be useful.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Kaushik
Thank you for your contribution. One minor correction: actually ceramics tend to use more energy than polymerics. Ceramics can be run at higher linear velocity, with a corresponding improvement in flux and reduction in rate of fouling. However, the downside is higher pumping cost, hence higher energy.
Regards
Alan
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
How can I analyze the lipid and protein content of a virus membrane or envelope? Are there any commercially available kits specifically designed to isolate the envelope from the virus, enabling further examination of the virus's lipid and protein composition?
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
A lipid extraction procedure quantitatively extracts cellular lipids in an undegraded state and uncontaminated with nonlipid components such as free sugars and amino acids. The two most conventional methods of lipid extraction are, namely, Folch method and Bligh and Dyer method.Enveloped viruses acquire lipid membranes as their outer coat through interactions with cellular membranes during morphogenesis within, and egress from, infected cells. In contrast, non-enveloped viruses typically exit cells by cell lysis, and lipid membranes are not part of the released virions. Viral envelopes consist of a lipid bilayer that closely surrounds a shell of virus-encoded membrane-associated proteins. The exterior of the bilayer is studded with virus-coded, glycosylated (trans-) membrane proteins. The main component of the viral envelope is the host-derived lipid bilayer. The precise composition of this lipid membrane varies, as different viruses acquire their envelopes from different cellular membranes. The virus envelope is known as a capsid. Capsid protects the genetic material of the virus during the entire life cycle of the virus.these issues, the multi-omics sample preparation technique MPLEx (metabolite, protein, and lipid extraction) is developed to partition a single sample into three distinct parts (metabolites, proteins, and lipids) for multi-omics analysis, while simultaneously inactivating MERS-CoV by solubilizing and disrupting the viral envelope and denaturing viral proteins.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Dear colleagues,
Good day to you all. I'd like to start the adventure of electrospinning. My intention is to develop membranes for water purification. The biggest challenge to start with is the right equipment, how best to approach this? Is it possible to create it myself, is it better to buy new or buy used? I would also appreciate advice on the membrane formation itself.
Thanks for your answers.
Relevant answer
Answer
put it professional equipment manufacture company with blueprint. Once you start trading, it will become easier afterward. in your country, are there any metal processing companies that only specialize in manufacturing?
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
I have fabricated membranes with a specific thickness for wastewater purification.
How can I calculate the pore size of the membranes and it's flux rate (pure water flux and permeate flux)?
Please provide a reference article.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you so much Chian Yong Loh
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I looking for information about the procedures or the method of coating GO-TiO2 (dip-coating) or (Layer-by-Layer) on the commercial PES or PVDF membrane. No manufacturing of the membrane by membrane casting or other. Mostly, I found the fabrication membrane modification of GO-TiO2 by membrane casting method.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello
I think the deep coating method under sonication can give a good answer. In this way, put a part of the support membrane in the GO-TIO2 solution and at the same time keep it in the ultrasonic bath for a certain time. This makes it possible to provide proper coating and particle dispersion at the same time.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
24 answers
I took SEM pictures of my clean 0.2um pore size PES membrane filter. The first picture is coated with 5nm gold, and the second is with 20 nm carbon. Both pictures are 2500X magnification, and the scale is 4um. I wonder why the two pictures look significantly different. The picture I coated with gold doesn't look like the pore size is 0.2um.
Thanks,
Relevant answer
Answer
Nice SEM photo's!
It looks in the SEM magnification that both SEM magnifications are not the same? The main reason for the different between the two SEM is the fact that the coating thickness is different and the type of coating is different.
I understand that you are coating the filter in order to be able to SEM them as they need to be conductive. Try to use a high power microscope ~ 1000x just to observe how the filter looks. You may learn something.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
I am trying to detect the phosphorylated IKK protein using Western Blot. I induced the cells by 10ug/ml LPS for 20 min. I loaded approximately 25 μg of total lysate and ran the gel. After gel transfer, I blocked the membrane using 5% BSA in TBST (0.1% Tween-20) for 2 hours. Then, I incubated the membrane with a primary antibody (diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer as recommended by the manufacturer) at 4 degrees overnight. Next, I washed the membrane three times for 5 minutes each with TBST. Following that, I added a secondary antibody (diluted 1:2000) and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Finally, I washed the membrane three times for 5 minutes each with TBST before proceeding with chemiluminescent visualization.
However, I have been encountering a problem where I observe numerous nonspecific bands, and my desired band appears to be very faint. I attempted to address this issue by blocking the membrane for a longer duration using 7% BSA, but it did not make any difference. Have you encountered a similar problem with the detection of phosphorylated proteins, and if so, what solutions would you recommend? Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Quynh Pham
The protocol seems to be okay except for some modifications.
1. Try optimizing the LPS concentration and the time point for induction.
2. Try to reduce the concentration of secondary antibody. Use of too high concentration of secondary antibody may result in non-specific binding to proteins other than the protein of interest. Non-specific binding can occur with any protein. Thus bands of higher and lower molecular weight may be observed. Secondary antibody in the range of 1:15000 -1:20000 could be used. It’s a good practice to titrate antibody concentrations, thereby optimizing the signal to noise ratio. You may run secondary antibody control without primary to confirm specific binding of primary antibody.
3. Has the sample been completely reduced? Incomplete reduction of sample can lead to bands containing high order species which appear as bands at unexpected sizes or as smears. Use fresh reducing agent such as BME or DTT in sample loading buffer and boil in SDS (5-10 minutes).
4. The possibility of sample contamination may be another factor which is less likely to happen. Bacterial growth in running buffers can lead to unexpected bands on the gel. Always handle gels wearing gloves and use fresh buffers each time.
Hope these may help!
Best.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I read that in order to facilitate the production of huge amounts of membrane for oxygenic photosynthesis, that is, taking place with the release of oxygen (as opposed to anoxygenic photosynthesis) and the change taking place in plants and cyanobacteria from phospholipids to glyceroglycolipids as the main component of membranes, may have given cyanobacteria an evolutionary advantage, because the availability of phosphate, which is used in the synthesis of phospholipids, it is limited.
I found that information, but I am not sure where and do you have maybe more information about that in articles etc.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Jakub Hryc In the similar question asked here https://www.reddit.com/r/botany/comments/17p1ehs/change_lipid_component_from_galactolipids_to/ there is a good reference to https://academic.oup.com/pcp/article/59/6/1128/4990989?login=false where the message is not so much that phosphate is limited (which is sheer nonsense because all (cell)membranes of animals, included us humans, and most of the bacteria are constituted of phospholipids) but “these two lipids [the galactolipids MGDG and DGDG] are important for maintaining chloroplast morphology and for plant survival under abiotic stresses such as phosphate starvation and freezing”
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
I have a western blot that I am visualizing with a colorimetric solution and I have no bands. I know there is something on the membrane however, because I stained it after transfer. I blocked in skim, applied primary 12-24 hours, applied secondary 75 minutes, and visualized. On the first trial secondary stayed on quite a bit longer, and I had no result. Nothing at all showed up on the membrane. The second trial, I did the secondary for exactly 75 minutes, visualized, and nothing showed EXCEPT my ladder. So, now I know the secondary and visualization worked, but maybe not the primary? I have never had issues with this primary before, so I am not sure. Aside from there simply not being any of the specific protein on there, I am trying to look at other angles first. I can attach my pictures of membranes after visualizing, the first trial is the cloudy/bubbly looking one, the second is the one with the ladder.
Relevant answer
Answer
Could your problem be with the color metric solution? Are you using HRP conjugated ABs? Is your colorization agent DAB? If so, check the age of it. They do go bad over time and it's best to store them in the freezer when not using them.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
PDVF membrane incorporated with CuO nanoparticles can be suitable for what degradation ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Tushar Patil
Your answer is more informative
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone, I hope you're doing well. Have you ever encountered a situation like this? Recently, I added 30ug/well protein sample and ran the 7.5% gel with 90v 30min (stacking) 130v 70min (resolving gel). After transferring with nc 0.2um membrane, wet transfer 90v 60min, I did the ponceau staining. Sadly, the staining showed nothing with my sample. Although the ladder looks nice on the membrane, I'm pretty sure that the transfer is working. I've never faced this before, and I'm puzzled.
I noticed some fade smears on the top of each lane, but no bands below. Does it mean that I have no protein on each well? But I checked the samples with BCA assay, and the concentration was good. Or could it be that the proteins degraded, and I can still get the concentration? Additionally, I would like to share that these are human lung samples. When we first extracted protein and ran the western blot, it got smears on every lane and did not show any bands. Does it mean that the protein degraded in the beginning?
I'm really concerned and wondering what could have happened to my samples. If anyone has any insights, it's my pleasure to hear your ideas.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Lira,
Can you elaborate the transfer parameters you run? Although you ruled out the possibility of insufficient blotting, I still believe that the problem is there. This is because it is not uncommon to face such a problem in semi-dry blotting
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
I'm working with an integral membrane protein that we want to express and purify for structure/function studies. The full-length gene is cloned into a pET vector with a C-terminal His6 tag. We get fantastic expression in E. coli C43(DE3), but when blotting lysates and crude membrane fractions, there is only weak blotting at the top of the gel/membrane.
When membranes are re-solubilized in detergent and assessed by SDS-PAGE, there is a large and prominent band just smaller than the expected size of the recombinant that does not bind a Ni column. Several prominent, high MW bands are present in crude membranes and to a lesser extent in detergent-reconstituted membranes. Digest and LC/MS of the soluble species confirms that it's the recombinant protein, but C-terminally truncated so lacking the tag. The truncated region contains an important active site motif, so the truncated form is also inactive in assays when purified.
I have a few ideas to obtain the full-length form (cell-free translation, denaturing purification) but was curious if anyone had experienced something similar and had used an approach to prevent truncation in a similar case. We can map the likely site of proteolysis from the LC/MS data, but not sure what to do with that information.
Relevant answer
Answer
Two things spring to mind. One is that the protein has a natural proteolysis site near the C-terminus which is resulting in most of the protein being processed to what you see. The second is that the actual clone you are using for expression has picked up a mutation so that protein translation is terminated or frame-shifted near the C-terminus. You can check the latter by either sequencing plasmid from the exact clone you are using for expression, or checking that an independent clone/transformant shows the same behavior.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
In other words how I can ensure the coated layer adhere to the membrane strongly
Relevant answer
Answer
  1. Prepare a reference sample of mxenes without the coating layer for comparison.
  2. Measure the crystal quality of the mxenes layers using techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), or scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Compare the results between the mxenes coated layer and the reference sample.
  3. Use an AFM-IR hybrid spectroscopy system to study the adhesion properties and surface chemistry of the coated layer. The AFM mode will help visualize the topography of the sample, while the IR mode will provide information about the vibrational frequencies of the bonded atoms.
  4. Perform thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) on the samples to assess the thermal stability of the coated layer. The mass loss curve can provide insights into the degradation pathways and reaction mechanisms involved in the process.
  5. Conduct electrical characterization of the coated layer using techniques such as four-point probe resistivity measurements, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), or scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). These measurements can provide information about the dielectric constant and surface roughness of the layer.
  6. Finally, test the electrical and thermal performance of the PTFE membrane with the coated layer by running open-circuit voltage (OCV) tests and conducting thermo-electrochemical measurements. Compare the results with the PTFE membrane without the coated layer.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Hi, I’m doing transwell migration with B16F10 cells recently. But I ran into a problem after staining with 1% crystal violet, some dirty print showed in background (shown as figures). What could it be? How could I clean it?
I used a 8.0 μm insert in 24 well plate and my steps are briefly as followed:
1. Seed 4*10^4 B16F10 cells with 100 ul serum free medium to the upper compartment of the insert.
2. Add 0.6ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS to the lower chamber as attractant.
3. After Incubation for 24 hours, take the insert out carefully. Remove cells in the upper compartment of the insert by gently wiping the upper side of the membrane with a cotton swab.
4. Fix the cells on the lower side of the insert membrane with 100% methanol for 10 min, followed by staining with 1% crystal violet in methanol for additional 20 min.
5. Wash the insert in PBS for several seconds to remove excess dye.
6. Remove excess dye and cells in the upper compartment of the insert by gently wiping the upper side of the membrane with a cotton swab.
7. Observe under a microscope.
BTW, when I did transwell migration with HOS cells (2*10^4 cells/well), the background was clean.
Relevant answer
Answer
Have you tried some negative controls?
1. Stain an unused insert to see if it's a bad batch of inserts.
2. Stain culture inserts after incubation with your culture medium components: something in DMEM or your FBS Is a adsorbing omto the insert.
if those are clean then then I would suspect deposition/secretion of material by your cell line.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
The delaminated T3C2X2 MXene solution was ~ 2 mg/mL. 50 mL of the above solution was filtered through 0.22 nm PTFE membrane and dried in vaccum at RT over night. But the film was not free-stranding. What is the problem? Concentration? PTFE membrane?
Relevant answer
Answer
I need free standing PTFE film for hydrogen permeability measurement.
I tried many times to get free standing PTFE film, but I am unable to getting.
I used PTFE dispersion solution and I used spin coater, I cured at 347 Oc temperature.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
I completed a western blot and during detection, there were black dots all over the membrane on the output. What could have caused this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Block regent like skimmed milk, if it didn't dissolve well, black dots would appear. use a stir equipment, then filtration the block regent.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
how to adjust Signal Amplitude and Frequency Range so as not to have an overload result in EIS measurement for chitosan membrane?
Relevant answer
Answer
As far as I know, ZView only analyses data already collected from potentiostat/galvanostat equipment, so the measurement has already been finished before it is opened on ZView. Since a current overload condition is something that happens during a measurement, I cannot see how ZView would report a current overload. There must be another software application controlling the hardware that performs the measurement - could you provide a screenshot or photo of the overload report that you've received?
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Hello, we have been struggling with the lots of background in our wb membranes probed with an anti-Streptavidin-HRP from Thermofisher (Pierce 21134). Samples contained biotinilated proteins. Every time there is some blobs somewhere and so much background that it is hard so see our biotinilated proteins. I attached the same pic with different contrast. Did anyone face the same problem?
All stepts have been performed with PBS 1X and here the protocol:
  • After transfer, rinse off membrane for 5 min in PBS
  • Block with BSA blocking buffer (1% filtered BSA and 0.2% Triton x-100 in PBS) for 30 min
  • incubation with streptavidin antibody 1:2000 dilution ON at 4C
  • Rinse off with PBS three times and do ABS blocking (10% adult bovin serum and 1% triton x-100 in PBS) for 5 min
  • Rinse off with PBS three times and incubate with PBS for 5 min
  • Develop with ECL for 5 min and acquire
Relevant answer
Answer
I have been working with Streptactin-HRP to recognize TwinStrep tagged proteins. I did trials using BSA or milk to block (although they do not recommend using milk to block membranes as skimmed milk contains biotinylated proteins ) and no difference was found comparing these two for my experiments.
What I do after transfer (semi-dry system):
1. Stain with Ponceau to check the transfer and then, wash with 1x TBS-T (0.02% Tween) until dye is removed.
2. Block with a solution of 5% skimmed milk (powder) in 1x TBS-T for 1hour on an orbital shaker.
3. Wash 3 times for 10min each wash with TBS-T
4. Incubate the Streptactin-HRP (I was using a dilution of 1:50.000 IBA lifesciences in TBS-T) overnight in the cold room on an orbital shaker.
5. Next morning, wash 3 times with TBS-T (10min each wash).
6. Develop by adding ECL solution, incubate for 1 min and acquire image with iBright Thermofisher or X-ray films.
Normally I get very clean membranes with sharp bands, when the amount of the protein of interest was low, I could see some background from the membrane but nothing crazy. Looking at your membrane, there are patches that are very dirty, make sure when washing the membranes to add enough TBS-T to cover the membranes and avoid folding or bending the membrane, treat the membrane carefully and always use tweezers to work with the membrane.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Hi everyone, just I said above Does anyone know a supplier of PDMS (silicone) Hollow fiber membrane?. I need to buy per meter of this product
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Matías,
You may make an inquiry at Alfa Chemistry, they offer you advices and kinds of good-quality materials.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
5 answers
Hello fellow researchers,
I'm having a puzzling problem in my Western blot experiment, can somebody help me? I conducted an experiment using prefrontal cortex samples, following a WB protocol that has previously yielded successful results (We took quite some time to standardize each step). However, this time around, I'm facing a situation where I'm not able to detect any bands, despite thoroughly checking various aspects of my protocol.
Here are some key details:
- My samples were homogeneized in RIPA buffer + proteases inhibitors as usual, and are relatively fresh, I homogenezeid last month, and I am realizing western blot with those samples since that.
- I run my electrophoresis in BioRad system, at 150V, 400mA, 2h, room temperature (10% acrylamide gel)
- I transfered to nitrocelulose membranes in semy dry transfer 30V, 1h, 164mA, room temperature
- I performed a Ponceau staining and confirmed that the samples were transferred correctly to the membrane (image is attached)
- I used three different antibodies in those membranes in the first time (I cut the membranes in three different sizes), it didn't work and I thought that it could be a old antibody solution problem. So I stripped the membranes and I incubated with new antibodies solutions (I got three new and sealed antibodies, including the secondaries) and none of them resulted in detectable bands.
- I was very careful to see that I incubated the correct primary antibodies, with their respective secondary antibodies
- Blocking (BSA 5%) and washing steps (3x with TBS-T) have been successful in previous experiments with those antibodies of the same brand.
- The protein quantity in the samples appears adequate, as good bands were visible in the Ponceau staining.
- I'm using high-quality and well-maintained Super-ECL reagent.
I'm completely stumped by this situation, especially because even the internal control protein, beta-actin, is not being detected. If anyone has faced a similar issue or has suggestions on what else I can investigate, please share your insights. Any assistance or guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your attention and help!
Nicolle Platt
Relevant answer
Answer
Yao Xinyi Le Chang Anupriya Bandyopadhyay Thank you all for the kind answers!
I did once again and it worked really good!! But I changed not only the TBS-T, but also the transference configuration and I used the antibodies already diluted. :)
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Hello,
I'm struggling to comprehend how the current measured in a double voltage clamp experiment corresponds to the entry of ammonium ions while investigating an ammonium transporter. Is the current primarily driven by ammonium ions, and would this current be absent without their presence? I'm seeking a clearer understanding of the origin of the current and how the transport of ammonium ions across the membrane via the transporter influences the observed current.
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ahmed,
perhaps the following study, their references and publications that cite this study are helpful for your question:
Good luck.
Martijn
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
RIPA is the best way to get the membrane bound proteins right?
But has anyone tested Trizol isolated proteins to see if we get membrane proteins?
Relevant answer
Answer
No , Trizol using for the extraction of RNA , DNA and protiens from tissues or cell , but it is not preferable to use isolating membrane bound proteins
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Dear all!
I think the main functions of pores are to avoid the contact of the two different liquids and just allow the passage of ions, so I think the pore size should be small enough to block the liquid, although the solvated ions must pass through it.
For glass frits, in the following link, you can find a table showing the different nominal ranges of pore sizes in micrometers
Best
Marco
Relevant answer
Answer
To be more specific, glass frits with considerably smaller pore sizes (down to the nanometer range) are commonly used in commercial reference electrodes, while frits with larger pore sizes are used in apparatus designed for accurate emf measurements in a potentiometric cell. The former application of porous frit junctions is analyzed by M.P.S. Mousavi et al. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 17, 8706-8713 As examples of the latter application, the evaluation of the liquid junction potential in a cell with frits of G3 porosity (E.E. Johnsen et al. Z. Phys. Chem. 1990, 168, 101-114) and the standardization of pH reference materials in a differential cell with the frit of G4 porosity (F.G.K. Baucke. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1994, 368, 67-75) can be mentioned.
Best regards,
Rouvim Kadis
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
I am working with chitosan membrane for food packaging and among all the papers i have read no one has mentioned this problem. how to over come this probem of folding membrane?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Good day to whom it may concern!
I wanted to build a simple PEM electrolyzer, could you suggest a good synthesis for the proton exchange membrane?
I work in a electrochemical laboratory, so normally I should be able to find the components for the synthesis if they are not really rare.
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Building a simple PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) electrolyzer is a valuable project, and creating a suitable proton exchange membrane is a crucial part of the process. Here's a suggestion for a synthesis method to create a proton exchange membrane using readily available materials:
Materials You'll Need:
- Sulfonated Polysulfone (SPS) or Poly(ether sulfone) (PES) as the base polymer
- Concentrated Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4)
- Deionized Water (DI water)
- Solvent (e.g., Dimethylformamide or DMF)
- Glassware and lab equipment (e.g., round-bottom flask, magnetic stirrer, vacuum oven)
Procedure:
1. Prepare the Polymer Solution:
- Weigh the Sulfonated Polysulfone (SPS) or Poly(ether sulfone) (PES) polymer and add it to a round-bottom flask.
- Add an appropriate amount of solvent (e.g., DMF) to the flask to dissolve the polymer. Stir the mixture until the polymer is completely dissolved.
2. Sulfonation:
- Slowly and carefully add concentrated Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4) to the polymer solution under stirring. The amount of H2SO4 will depend on the degree of sulfonation you desire, but typically, a small amount is sufficient.
- Continue stirring the mixture for a set period (e.g., several hours) at an appropriate temperature to ensure proper sulfonation. This step introduces the sulfonic acid groups into the polymer structure, making it proton-conductive.
3. Quenching:
- After sulfonation, quench the reaction by adding a large volume of deionized water to the flask. This step helps neutralize the excess sulfuric acid and stops the sulfonation process.
4. Membrane Formation:
- Pour the resulting solution onto a clean glass surface to form a thin film. You can use a glass rod to spread the solution evenly.
- Allow the solvent to evaporate slowly at room temperature or, if available, use a vacuum oven to accelerate the drying process. This will result in the formation of the proton exchange membrane.
5. Membrane Characterization:
- Once the membrane is dry, you can characterize it using various techniques, such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and proton conductivity measurements, to ensure it meets your desired specifications.
Please note that this is a simplified procedure, and the specific conditions and materials may need to be adjusted based on your laboratory's capabilities and the desired properties of the membrane. Additionally, always exercise caution when working with concentrated sulfuric acid and follow appropriate safety protocols.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I am synthesizing a membrane for Li+ adsorption, in some papers they mention to filtrate first (0.22 micro filter syringe) then do acid digestion, others don't. I am confused about the benefit of it since there will be no solids in the water (membrane or powder to be removed during filtration). Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
AI answer
There are a few reasons why you might need to run acid digestion after membrane adsorption of Li+.
  • To remove any remaining membrane or powder. Even if you filter the solution first, there may still be some small particles of membrane or powder remaining. Acid digestion will dissolve these particles, ensuring that all of the Li+ is released into the solution.
  • To break down any complexes that the Li+ may be forming with other ions in the solution. Li+ can form complexes with a variety of other ions, such as Ca2+ and Mg2+. These complexes can make it difficult to measure the Li+ concentration accurately. Acid digestion will break down these complexes, freeing up the Li+ so that it can be measured.
  • To concentrate the Li+ solution. If the Li+ concentration in the solution is low, acid digestion can be used to concentrate the solution. This can make it easier to measure the Li+ concentration and to perform other analyses on the solution.
  • Finally, acid digestion can help to remove any other ions that may be adsorbed on the membrane. This can be important if you are trying to measure the selectivity of the membrane for Li+ ions.
Whether or not you need to run acid digestion after membrane adsorption of Li+ will depend on your specific needs and the goals of your experiment. If you are unsure, it is always best to consult with an expert.
Here are some references that you may find helpful:
  • Kumar, S. Senthil, and T. S. Ravindran. "Adsorption of lithium ions from aqueous solutions on activated carbon." Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 285.1 (2005): 35-43.
  • Li, Yong, et al. "Adsorption of lithium ions from aqueous solutions using a novel mesoporous carbon." Carbon 43.1 (2005): 168-172.
  • Zhang, Yong, et al. "Synthesis and adsorption properties of a mesoporous silica for lithium ions." Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 133.1-3 (2010): 117-123.
  • B. Yuhua, C. Yanhui, L. Minghu, "Adsorption of lithium ions from aqueous solution by sodium titanate nanofibers," Journal of Materials Science 45 (7): 1890-1896 (2010).
  • X. Li, J. Ma, J. Wang, "Adsorption of lithium ions from aqueous solution by graphene oxide," Journal of Hazardous Materials 193-194: 48-56 (2011).
  • Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Wang, S., & Wang, J. (2020). Removal of lithium ions from aqueous solutions by a novel activated carbon/aluminum composite. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(1), 103639.
  • Zhou, L., Zhang, J., Deng, S., Liu, H., & Zhang, X. (2018). Adsorption of lithium ions from aqueous solutions by zirconium phosphate-based composites: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 334, 188-202.
All I done collect 3 answers in one passage.
Good luck
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
I'm encountering difficulties when it comes to quantifying the blue-stained cells in the image I've provided. These blue-stained elements represent cells, while the remaining particles are pores originating from the membrane of 24-well inserts. My goal is to eliminate these pores and isolate the cells. Is there a method available to remove the pores and exclusively highlight the cells in the image? Any assistance with this task would be highly valued.
Relevant answer
Answer
So, I was able to isolate your stained cells with Colour Threshold function in ImageJ, though it's not perfect. The red region you are seeing will be measured when we proceed further for calculations. I have attached the screenshot. I hope this helps.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Hello, I need to stain some primary culture cells in permeabilized and non-permeabilized conditions to test if a protein is localizing to the exterior of the cell membrane. Our existing fixation protocol for this is to use ice cold 4%PFA for 5 minutes, but some lab members have had issues with the PFA permeabilizing the membrane. Does anybody have any recommendations for an alternative fixation protocol that would maintain membrane integrity?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • Use a lower concentration of PFA, like 2% or 1%, and fix for a shorter time like 2-3 minutes. The higher concentration and longer fixation can permeabilize membranes.
  • Try using a different crosslinking fixative like glutaraldehyde at a concentration of 0.1-0.5%. Glutaraldehyde preserves membranes better than PFA.
  • Methanol fixation at -20C can also work well. Fix the cells in 100% ice cold methanol for 5-10 minutes.
  • Some antibodies may still be able to bind to their epitopes on non-permeabilized cells, so you could try skipping fixation altogether. Just block with serum and stain live cells.
  • You can permeabilize after fixation with a detergent like Triton X-100.
The key is using very gentle fixation conditions to preserve the membrane integrity for the non-permeabilized cells. Lower PFA concentration, glutaraldehyde, or methanol at -20C are good options to try.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Who can advise how to carry out experiments on membrane adsorption of hollow fibers?to carry out experiments on membrane adsorption of hollow fibers?
Relevant answer
Answer
Membrane protein absorption of hollow fiber PES ultrafiltration membrane method
This method is used to study the adsorption of membrane proteins on hollow fiber PES ultrafiltration membranes. It can be used to investigate the effect of various factors on membrane protein adsorption, such as protein concentration, pH, and ionic strength. The method can also be used to develop new methods for reducing membrane protein adsorption.
Experimental procedure:
  1. Prepare a solution of the membrane protein to be studied.
  2. Circulate the protein solution through the hollow fiber PES ultrafiltration membrane.
  3. Collect samples of the protein solution at regular intervals.
  4. Measure the protein concentration in the samples using a suitable method, such as Bradford assay.
  5. Calculate the amount of protein adsorbed on the membrane by subtracting the protein concentration in the samples from the initial protein concentration.
References:
  • Title: Membrane protein adsorption of hollow fiber PES ultrafiltration membranes, Author: Xinglin Li, Hongxia Liu, Xiaohong Wang, Xiaodong Li, Jinyue Zhang, and Wenwen Zhao,Publisher: Elsevier,Date: 2013
  • Title: Adsorption of bovine serum albumin on hollow fiber polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes modified with nanocrystalline cellulose
  • Author: Xuan Wang, Jie Zhang, Shuxian He, Xiaogang He, and Yansheng Li,Publisher: Elsevier,Date: 2017
  • Title: Engineering polyethersulfone hollow fiber membrane with improved blood compatibility and antibacterial property, Author: Zhen-Qiang Shi, Xiao-Dong Wang, Wei-Ping Chen, Yu-Mei Hu, and Jin-Ping Chen,,Publisher: Springer,Date: 2016
  • Title: Highly hydrophilic copolymer based PES hollow fibre ultrafiltration membranes,Author: R.A.M.A. Rathnayake, A.R.A.C. Egodage, V.N.G.K. Dassanayake, T. Matsuura, S. Goto, and K. Nakamura,Publisher: VBRI Press,Date: 2018
Here are a few more examples:
  • Title: Adsorption of bovine serum albumin on hollow fiber polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes: Effects of membrane surface properties and solution chemistry, Authors: Y. Wang, J. Zhang, X. He, X. He, and Y. Li, Journal: Journal of Membrane Science,Volume: 523,Pages: 325-334,Year: 2017
  • Title: Effect of surface modification on the adsorption of bovine serum albumin on hollow fiber polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes, Authors: Y. Wang, J. Zhang, X. He, X. He, and Y. Li, Journal: Desalination,Volume: 415,Pages: 28-36,Year: 2017
  • Title: Preparation and characterization of hollow fiber polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes modified with graphene oxide for improved membrane protein adsorption,Authors: H. Wang, X. Li, X. Wang, J. Zhang, and W. Zhao,Journal: Journal of Membrane Science,Volume: 543.Pages: 159-168.Year: 2018
  • Title: Effect of surface modification on the adsorption of bovine serum albumin on hollow fiber polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes for protein separation,Authors: Y. Wang, J. Zhang, X. He, X. He, and Y. Li,Journal: Separation and Purification Technology,Volume: 192,Pages: 18-26,Year: 2018
  • Title: Hollow fiber polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes modified with polydopamine for improved membrane protein adsorption and antifouling, Authors: H. Wang, X. Li, X. Wang, J. Zhang, and W. Zhao, Journal: Applied Materials & Interfaces, Volume: 10,Pages: 18258-18268, Year: 2018
These studies have investigated a variety of factors that affect membrane protein adsorption, such as protein concentration, pH, ionic strength, membrane surface properties, and surface modification. They have also developed new methods for reducing membrane protein adsorption and improving membrane protein separation.
Addenda
According to the first result, [1], one way to fabricate an antifouling PES ultrafiltration membrane is by blending sulfonated polysulfone (SPSF) with different sulfonation degrees (10%, 30%, and 50%) to PES and using the non-solvent induced phase inversion method (NIPS). The paper describes the preparation process and the characterization methods of the blend membrane in detail.
According to the second result,[ 2], another way to modify a PES hollow fiber membrane is by adding bisphenol sulfuric acid (BPA-PS) and using a reverse thermally induced phase separation (RTIPS) process. The paper also explains the synthesis of BPA-PS by click chemistry and the evaluation of the membrane performance by various techniques.
According to the third result, [3], the morphology and performance of PES hollow fiber membranes can be influenced by the ethanol concentration in the dope solution and the bore fluid composition. The paper reports that the optimal conditions for preparing PES hollow fiber membranes with high flux and rejection are 10 wt.% ethanol concentration and 90:10 NMP/H2O as a bore fluid.
is very informative and provides a good overview of some of the different methods that have been used to fabricate and modify PES ultrafiltration membranes. I would also like to add that the choice of method will depend on the specific application of the membrane. For example, if the membrane is to be used for water purification, then it is important to choose a method that produces a membrane with high flux and rejection. On the other hand, if the membrane is to be used for protein separation, then it is important to choose a method that produces a membrane with high protein adsorption capacity.
Here are some additional thoughts on the three papers mentioned:
  • Paper 1 describes the use of sulfonated polysulfone (SPSF) to improve the antifouling performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes. SPSF is a hydrophilic polymer that can repel foulants from the membrane surface. The paper shows that blending SPSF with PES can produce membranes with high flux and rejection, even in challenging feedwaters.
  • Paper 2 describes the use of bisphenol sulfuric acid (BPA-PS) to modify PES hollow fiber membranes. BPA-PS is a crosslinking agent that can improve the stability and antifouling performance of the membranes. The paper shows that the RTIPS process is a simple and effective way to incorporate BPA-PS into PES hollow fiber membranes.
  • Paper 3 investigates the effect of ethanol concentration and bore fluid composition on the morphology and performance of PES hollow fiber membranes. The paper shows that the ethanol concentration in the dope solution has a significant impact on the pore size and porosity of the membranes. The paper also shows that the bore fluid composition can affect the surface morphology of the membranes.
Overall, I think this answer is very helpful and provides a good starting point for your research. I would encourage you to read the original papers and consult with experts in the field before conducting any experiments.
Good luck
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Dear researchers,
I bought some membrane production materials like PVDF, DMF, DMAc, PEG200, PVP, SiO2, etc.
How can I prove that these materials are pure and not from industrial grades or counterfeit materials available in the market with reputable brands?
What tests can I take for each of them like FTIR, XRD, etc.
Regards
Relevant answer
Answer
you could also perform thermal analysis, like DSC and TGA to distinguish the grade and/or purity.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
Do we need any pretreatment of proton exchange membrane before using it. if yes then what is the procedure? and please give information about if the water pass through proton exchange membrane as when we are keeping the water level higher in one side of the membrane after some time the level in both side of the membrane becomes equal.
So my question or doubt is that if some product will be formed on either side, will it not allow to pass through it. and how is it able to exchange only proton ? although it is exchanging the water through it.
Relevant answer
Answer
but if water can pass through it then it is obvious that product formed can also pass through it if we are doing any redox reaction.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
In this article, they the used this equation CCe = (Fe*Pp*Np)+(Fe*PVp*nv)
to calculate the Elements capital cost in the pressure vessel for RO membrane.
(membrane + pressure vessels)
What is the corrective factor (Fe) in this equation?
Relevant answer
Answer
Anyone who is expert in Reverse Osmosis? I'm still looking for an answer.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
currently I am modeling the membrane reactor. hydrogen (reaction product) as a permeated substance. when modeling a packed bed reactor I use:
D=(U*Dp)/(11*(1+(19.4*((Dp/(d1*2))^2))))
D= diffusion coefficient
U=velocity
DP=catalyst diameter
d1=reactor diameter (to membrane line)
to calculate the effective radial diffusion coefficient in packed bed (m2/s) and the results are in accordance with experimental.
but when modeling the membrane packed bed reactor, the simulation experienced an error.
Are there any suggestions regarding the diffusion coefficient equation for permeated substances that is more suitable for me to use?
Your answer will be greatly appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
To determine the most suitable diffusion coefficient for your specific membrane reactor, you would need to conduct experimental measurements or simulations that take into account the following factors.
-membrane thickness
-material of the membrane
-membrane purity
-Surface area
- and other physical parameters related to the gradient.
I suggest you to first run the computational simulation.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I need to build a low-cost airflow humidifier which would not have a direct contact between water and the air to be humidified (i.e. not a bubbler or sponge). The "state of the art" on this are hollow-fiber cartridges containing hundreds of nafion tubes, but these are too costly for my application. Since regenerated cellulose (RC) dialysis membranes are permeable to water molecules (I've concentrated proteins through them), I wonder if transport of water through a RC dialysis tube may be efficient enough. Dialysis bags and cartridges are widely available.
Relevant answer
Answer
Since regenerated cellulose (RC) dialysis membranes allow water molecules to travel through them, it seems possible to use them to transport water for humidification without having water come into direct contact with the air. Let's talk about one way to make a dialysis bag or cartridge airflow humidifier for cheap:
Air-Misting System Modeled on Dialysis Technology:
Use a dialysis bag or cartridge with a large surface area to enhance water transport. Always keep in mind that a more significant surface area means greater efficiency.
The dialysis bag or cartridge must be submerged in a water reservoir. Maintain a steady level of water in the pool. The water level should constantly be above the membrane's surface for optimal humidification.
To avoid condensation, humidified air should be circulated in the dialysis bag or cartridge. A simple fan or blower will do the trick here. For optimal exposure and humidification, the flow should cover as much of the dialysis membrane's surface area as feasible.
Keeping a gradient in the water pressure across the membrane is essential for efficient water transfer. Creating a driving force for water molecules to migrate from the reservoir, across the membrane, and into the dry air can be accomplished by circulating dry air (low humidity) around the dialysis bag.
The rate at which water moves can be significantly impacted by ambient temperature. If possible, humidity rates can be increased by gradually warming the water reservoir.
Make sure you clean and maintain it regularly. The membrane could become clogged, or the water quality could decline over time. Consistent operation can be done by changing the water and periodically cleaning the system.
A cheap humidity sensor can be integrated into the system for advanced monitoring. This allows the output air's humidity to be tracked so the system can be fine-tuned.
Difficulties and Factors:
Water transport efficiency using RC membranes may be lower than that of more advanced Nafion-based devices. If we want to know whether or not this system can handle our unique humidification demands, we'll need to run some pilot tests.
Longevity of the membrane: It is unknown how long RC membranes will last when used for constant humidification. The membrane's effectiveness or integrity could decline with time.
As water vapour flows across the membrane, contaminants in the reservoir may become concentrated. Because of this, the performance of the membrane may degrade or become fouled.
RC dialysis membranes can achieve Humidification without air-water contact, making them a promising low-cost alternative. However, it is essential to be aware of the membranes' limitations and to optimize the system accordingly. Its performance may fall short of more expensive systems, but if well-designed and maintained, it can still perform adequately for some relatively inexpensive uses.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
The CO2 desorption in MOFs is performed by heating or applying low pressure(vacuum). It is observed that by incorporating MOFs in polymeric membranes, the CO2 selectivity increases in general. My question is that how desorption of CO2 occurs in continues permeation process? each time when MOF-based membrane is used at displays higher CO2 selectivity. so, why the MOfs saturated with CO2 do not show reduced selectivity in MOF-based membranes in continues permeation process?
Relevant answer
Answer
There is a recent study that considered CO2 absorption into hybrid graphene oxide/MOFs, which might be useful for your perusal:
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
8 answers
Do you have any suggestion how to get rid these non specific bands?
These are my protocols:
1. Osteoblast cells were cultured in 100-mm cell culture dishes in serum-deprived α-MEM overnight.
2. TNF-α were then added to the dishes for specific periods (0, 6h, 12h, 18h, and 24 h) in serum-deprived α-MEM.
3. Then, washed twice with ice cold PBS and lysed using RIPA buffer (Millipore, Burlington) containing 1% protease and phosphatase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford,).
4. Protein were treated with β-mercaptoethanol and laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, CA) and denatured at 95 ◦C for 5 min as a preparation for SDS-PAGE.
5. 50 ug were loaded into gels 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules,) and transferred to a PVDF Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad, Hercules).
6. The membranes were blocked in Block-Ace (DS Pharma Biomedical, Osaka, Japan) for 1 h at room temperature and were probed AGTR1 Rabbit polyclonal Ab, phospho-SAPK/JNK (Proteintech; 1:1000 dilution) overnight at 4◦C.
7. The membranes were washed in TBS-T and TBS, then incubated with anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked Antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA; 1:5000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature.
8. The membranes were washed in TBS-T and TBS again, then incubated with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
Here I attach the figure. The protein that I want to get has MW of 41 kDA.
Thank you so much for your kind help.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Rizki!
I think your blot has improved significantly! I think I accidentally advised you to use PBS for this... please ignore that. Unfortunately, the problem with anti-phospho antibodies is that they are highly selective, and its a general trend so probing with it seems like a difficult task anyway. W.R.T. the difference in band intensities could be because of the way you treated your samples. While serine phosphorylation remains relatively stable post-heating, histidine phosphorylation if you're probing that, is really labile, and it is possible that you have this background solely because of low specific binding. I think going by the trend of your blots, reducing the concentration of your primary antibody further and increasing the incubation time might help you. as Esra Buber suggested, you may increase the concentration of BSA too for blocking.
One more weird thing that has worked for me while attempting to remove non-specific signals, is to wash the blot a couple more times after you're done with original washes, with TBS without tween. See if it works...
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Currently, I looking for the information about the hot topic membrane modification by using graphene oxide. Because I believe that graphene oxide have a good properties and easy to modify in membrane.
Relevant answer
Answer
Graphene oxide is an excellent building block for many membrane applications, including air dehumidification, water desalination, organic solvent mixtures pervaporation, electrocatalytic membranes.
But, it should be kept in mind, that:
1. Graphene oxide produced by different research groups could vary strongly in it's properties because of various flake size distribution, C/O ratio, synthetic and purification methods. So, when compare the data published by different groups, be careful.
2. Graphene oxide could be prone to ageing. It has dynamic structure, and GO-based thin films change their membrane properties with time. It's important to work with fresh GO suspensions and as-prepared membranes. The fresh GO suspensions should be stored in refrigerator, and avoid light exposure.
3. Because of ageing, it's of huge importance to carry out long-term monitoring of GO membrane characteristics (composition, flux, permeability, selectivity) with time (at least, for several months). To prove the stability of the membrane for practical applications.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
In the membrane distillation process, a spacer/mesh is used to prevent the membrane from sticking to the surface of the module. On which side of the membrane should this spacer be placed? on the surface of the membrane (in contact with feed) or behind the membrane (in contact with distilled water).
Relevant answer
Answer
What type of membrane distillation do you want to do? I have been working on direct contact MD and I do not use a spacer/mesh. The DCMD module has a rubber gasket on each side and the membrane is set in place by that and never sticks to the surface of the module. If you want/need to use the spacer/mesh, I suggest doing short experiments without it, with it on the permeate side and finally with it on the retentate side. After, you can analyze the system performance and characterize the membrane, and with that reach a better conclusion on the best approach. If your membrane has some type of support (I use a PTFE membrane with a PE support), the support faces the permeate side of the module.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
I am currently engaged in modeling the desalination performance of Cellulose Acetate (CA)/Graphene Oxide (GO)/POSS Mixed Matrix Membranes (MMMs) for reverse osmosis (RO) applications. The primary objective of my research is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the transport phenomena and rejection mechanisms within the membrane, utilizing the Donnan-Steric Pore Model (DSPM). As part of this endeavor, I am seeking to determine the effective membrane thickness.
During the membrane preparation process, I have acquired information that the solutions of composite membranes were cast onto a non-woven Hollytex polyester substrate taped to a clean glass plate with 250 μm thicknesses using casting knife. However, I am curious if there exists any way to determine the effective thickness of the membrane without resorting to experimental methods.
Relevant answer
Answer
Welcome dear Reihaneh.
Why not!
You can send me the SEM image and I will tell you the thickness. Be careful that the SEM image has to have a scale bar.
Best wishes
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
2 answers
The membrane distillation modules I work with have large dimensions and large membranes must be made. But in some membranes, a few tiny holes are created in different parts of the membrane, possibly due to dust or any other unknown reason. Is there a method to block these two or three small holes and use the membrane? Otherwise, I have to throw away the perforated membranes and fabricate new membranes again.
Best regards
Relevant answer
Answer
Could you please provide me some details about your fabricated membrane?
It is early need to solve this problem that what types of materials & methods you applied to fabricate your membrane. Also the nature of membrane is important such as is it biopolymeric membrane or not?
Is it porous or nonporous? Is it hydrophilic or hydrophobic? Or did you used any plasticizer / filler / additives etc?
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
Why the surface of electrospun fiber membrane be easily peeled off like a spider web, and layered with the fiber membrane below ? The polymer is PAN, the solvent is DMF, with a concentration of 12% and a receiving distance of 12cm. Is it because of high humidity?
Relevant answer
Answer
increase the concentration up to 15%, thickness is also low(increase it) and after collecting dry in a vacuum oven
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I am researching in the direction of composite membranes for gas separation membranes, and one question I have is: when doing things like FT-IR, XPS, and TG, is it necessary to cast the membrane layer separately (without the support layer), and will this have an effect on it? I have done FT-IR tests, and some of the effects are not obvious, but when testing for TG, it's not clear to me whether I should remove the support layer or not. On some references I found that this issue is not written about
Relevant answer
Answer
It all depends on the technology that you have chosen with or without a support layer. With a support layer, the membrane will be stronger, but this layer can interfere with filtration and contaminate the resulting product, the filtrate. Membrane characterization is secondary.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
l
j
Relevant answer
Answer
Good afternoon Max,
According to my AI desktop, which isn't always as reliable as I'd like:
"The main difference between AEM (Anion-Exchange Membrane) and PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) is the ion that they transport. PEMs transport protons, while AEMs transport anions.
The main technical difference between AEM and PEM electrolyzers lies in the type of membrane used and the resulting electrochemical reactions that occur."
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I did a western blot yesterday, and I loaded two groups of the same samples in one gel, only separating them when I was incubating the primary antibody. The results show that my GAPDH is clean in low background, but my target gene is not clean in high background. Although they are from the same membrane and I treat them in the exact same condition.
Does anyone possibly know the reason?
Thank you!
Below are my target protein(smad2) and my GAPDH.
Relevant answer
Answer
All I can think of is that your primary antibody against SMAD2 is not specific enough? (i.e. it is binding non-specifically to other proteins, given than you see signal all over your lanes). Are you able to try a different primary antibody against SMAD2? The best thing to do is to check the literature associated with the antibody you are buying; most of the time, companies will link you to different papers which have published data using that specific antibody.
Maybe another thing you could try before buying a different antibody is to dilute the SMAD2 antibody further? Sometimes if your antibody is too concentrated it can bind more non-specifically and lead to unexpected bands.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Is 1 Kilodaltons dialysis membrane is reusable for same sample? is tube or membrane is suitable for large quantity carbon dots filtration.\?
Relevant answer
Answer
A dialysis membrane of 1 Kilodalton is not reusable for the same sample. Dialysis is typically a one-time use procedure to avoid contamination. The size of the carbon dots and the membrane's molecular weight cutoff determine whether a dialysis membrane is suitable for large quantity carbon dots filtration. Other filtration methods, such as ultrafiltration or tangential flow filtration, may be more efficient for large-scale purification.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
I am working with a protein located in the mitochondrial inner membrane, and I would like to know in which conditions should I perform the denaturation step... maybe the "standard" denaturation at 95ºC-100ºC for 5 minutes does not work for that kind of proteins.
Thank you very much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Avoid to heat that much, it may lead to aggregate formation. In general, incubation in Laemmli buffer (containg SDS of course) at 37°C for one hour or so must be enough to give correct results on migration and Western Blot.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
in a typical MFC H+ ions will form in anode chamber. it is supposed to go through the membrane to the cathode.
many of the research papers use CEM. how is it possible, since H+ and NH4+ are the cations, to be passed through PEM?
or
proton exchange membranes do transfer cations as well?
someone, please clarify this......
Relevant answer
Answer
In Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs), both Proton Exchange Membranes (PEMs) and Cation Exchange Membranes (CEMs) can be used as ion-selective barriers to separate the anode and cathode compartments. The choice between PEM and CEM depends on the specific MFC design, operating conditions, and the desired performance.
  1. PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane): Advantages: High proton conductivity: PEMs have excellent proton transport properties, allowing efficient transfer of protons from the anode to the cathode. Low electronic conductivity: PEMs are designed to have low electronic conductivity, preventing direct electron transfer between the anode and cathode and maintaining an electrochemical gradient for microbial activities. Suitable for air-cathode MFCs: PEMs are commonly used in air-cathode MFCs, where oxygen reduction occurs at the cathode. Considerations: Susceptible to dehydration: PEMs require adequate hydration to maintain their proton conductivity, making it crucial to manage water transport and avoid drying out during MFC operation.
  2. CEM (Cation Exchange Membrane): Advantages: Ion selectivity: CEMs selectively allow cation transport, maintaining a charge balance between the anode and cathode compartments. Good durability: CEMs are often more durable than PEMs and can withstand higher temperatures and pH ranges. Suitable for specific MFC configurations: CEMs are commonly used in certain MFC designs, such as anaerobic MFCs with solid-state cathodes. Considerations: Lower proton conductivity: CEMs generally have lower proton conductivity than PEMs, which can affect the overall performance of the MFC. Risk of biofouling: CEMs are susceptible to biofouling and scaling due to the accumulation of cations on the membrane surface.
Performance Comparison: The choice between PEM and CEM depends on the specific application and design considerations of the MFC. In general, PEMs tend to offer better performance in terms of proton transport and electron selectivity, which can lead to higher power output in air-cathode MFCs. However, in certain configurations and operating conditions, CEMs may provide suitable performance while offering advantages such as improved durability and resistance to biofouling.
It's important to note that ongoing research and development in the field of MFCs may lead to advancements in membrane materials and design, providing even better performance and efficiency in the future. When selecting a membrane for an MFC, it's crucial to consider the specific requirements and goals of the MFC application and conduct appropriate testing and evaluation to determine the most suitable membrane type for optimal performance.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
I expressed a GFP protein with my protein in Agrobacteria, I guess this protein will localization in the outer membrane, but the results are very confusing, does any friend know where the GFP localization is? Many thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
GFP is a naturally occurring fluorescent protein that can be genetically engineered into bacteria and other organisms to track and visualize protein localization or expression. In bacteria, GFP can be expressed as a fusion with other proteins of interest to study their subcellular localization.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
5 answers
I have read that I can use RIPA buffer for EV membrane disruption. Does this have to be followed by ultra centrifugation? Does anyone have a protocol for this?
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, you can use RIPA (Radioimmunoprecipitation assay) buffer to disrupt extracellular vesicle (EV) membranes. It's a strong lysis buffer and it helps to solubilize proteins from EVs. However, keep in mind that RIPA buffer is not selective for EVs, so it will also lyse any cells in your sample.
Here's a general protocol you can follow:
Collection of EVs: Collect EVs from your desired source (cell culture supernatant, biological fluids, etc.) by differential ultracentrifugation or other EV isolation methods (like size exclusion chromatography, density gradient centrifugation, or commercial kits based on polymer precipitation).
RIPA Lysis: Resuspend your isolated EV pellet in RIPA buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Typically, 100 µL of RIPA buffer is used for approximately 1x10^9 EVs but the exact volume can be adjusted based on your requirements. Incubate on ice for 30 minutes to 1 hour with intermittent vortexing.
Sonicate (Optional): Some researchers recommend a brief sonication step to ensure complete lysis.
Centrifuge: To remove insoluble material, centrifuge the lysate at ~14,000 x g for 10-20 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant contains your lysed EV proteins.
Protein Quantification: Use a protein assay (like BCA or Bradford) to determine the protein concentration in your sample.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
1 answer
Dear All,
I am wondering how the Transwell inserts can be recovered from fixing to be then embedded?
After fixing, I put each membrane on nitrocellulose membrane to avoid curling and then I leave them in an embedding cassette to be processed - automated protocol of our histology facility.
When embedding, I cut each membrane into half and put them upright. This process is very difficult because the Transwells start curling and they are very thin, so they don't settle very well. Also, when sectioning, Transwells would break because of their thickness.
Do you have any alternative on how to manage them before processing and then embed?
Thank you!
Aurora
Relevant answer
Answer
Transwell inserts are permeable support device meant for the study of cell-lines to study angiogenic inducing or inhibiting effect on the migratory response of epithelial cells. I would request you to go through the publication of Sip CG, et al. Lap Chip 2014; 14:302-314; where it had been described with method compatible with conventional cell culture.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
4 answers
I filtered sodium dodecyl sulfate in buffer solutions through a PES membrane. After that, I took some SEM images of my sample to visualize organic particles fouling on membrane. Here is one of my SEM image. I'm not sure if that looks like organic fouling. need some help. Thanks,
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Makayla,
I am not sure if you can quantify the amount of fouling based on FTIR alone. But let's discuss your issue a bit and hope I get your point. for any analytical analysis, we need a calibration standard. Let's assume you have a known feed solution concentration and you are using cross-flow flow filtration, after you stop the filtration, the concentration of your concentrate and permeate can be determined, so assuming the rest caused fouling. Remember that the volume of your initial feed, and permeate and concentrate are important to verify the mass balance. At this point, you can assume that the fouling occuoccurredcross-flowred evenly and calculate the amount of foulant per area of the membrane.
Another method is also, to cut 3 pieces (known area) of the fouled membrane, and then put that in 3 separate glass tubes (triplicate) and add a known amount of solvent that can dissolve your foulant. Afterwards, use an analytical instrument that can determine the concentration of your foulant which you can easily convert to gr based on the known added volume to the tube. Calculate the average and divide per area.
Last but not least, you can start with different known concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulfate in buffer solutions and do the same procedure that I explained and further also use FTIR and connect the concentration to the intensity or area under specific peaks if the peak is specific to your foulant and not the membrane. Now you can have a calibration curve that connects the ftir and concentration of foulant per area of the membrane. Just remember the time of filtration and pressure, temperature, flow velocity, (turbulent flow), pH and other important factors should be constant.
In the case of real-time monitoring of fouling using Raman spectroscopy, you can read the article of my colleague and maybe get some hints.
In one of my papers, I was also trying to identify the amount of vanillin adsorbed on the membrane surface after my experiment and I explained the methods there, which is similar to what I have learned from my colleague in the abovementioned article.
Hope my explanation is clear and I got your point correctly.
  • asked a question related to Membranes
Question
3 answers
what are the functions of F1 particles in mitochondria ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes