Science topic
Membranes - Science topic
Thin layers of tissue which cover parts of the body, separate adjacent cavities, or connect adjacent structures.
Questions related to Membranes
I am having an issue with the western blot transfer from last week, I see imprints of cassette on my membrane.
I am making a 14% gel and I run transfer for 2hr at 100V, after the transfer I see imprints of cassettes on the membrane.
I thought it could be because of the cassette was too tight or because of the temperature. So I keep in check for the cassette and temperature (1hr 45min) and repeated the western I see the same problem.
I used fresh buffers both the times.
Any suggestions how can I improve?
Problem 1: In my research, I encountered an issue with my wet transblot procedure: despite using 8-10ug of RNA sample and applying a voltage of 10 v for 2 hours in TBE transfer buffer, I observed incomplete transfer of the top band from the UREA gel (8M) to the nylon membrane upon examination.
Problem 2: for northern blot, I conducted prehybridization at temperatures ranging from 55°C, 60 °C, and 65°C, followed by membrane washing with SSC buffer and blocking with blocking solution. Subsequently, I proceeded wash the membrane in wash buffer and soak in detection buffer and applied CDP-Star on top of the membrane. The entire membrane exhibited fluorescence (is it normal?), later the resulting X-ray film exposure did not reveal the desired bands. Background noise quite bad. I would appreciate any professional guidance or suggestions to address this discrepancy."
I would like to run an invitro drug release experiment for chitosan nanoparticles (600nm) loaded with herbal extract using dialysis membrane method. However since its not easy to ascertain the molecular weight of the herbal extract because its mixture of different compounds. therefore I am not sure which is the best MWCO for dialysis membrane that I can use. I used 5Kda but nothing went through in 24hrs.
NF membranes sit between Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Ultrafiltration (UF) in terms of pore size. This allows them to remove a wider range of contaminants than UF but not as much as RO. However, current NF membranes aren't perfect at selectively removing certain contaminants while allowing desirable minerals to pass through. In optimizing NF membrane selectivity, could machine learning algorithms be used to design or predict ideal pore structures or surface functionalities for NF membranes?
For treatment of water (river), what is the life of ceramic membrane? For example, 5 years or 50 years? MF or UF?
Operation of ceramic membrane after usage: should be kept under water like polymeric membranes?
Aslamo alikom/ Greetings everyone,
I'm conducting a western blot experiment (8% SDS gel) and I wanna test 2 proteins, one is 95 KDa, and another is 35KDa. The antibodies I've for both are mouse Abs used at 1:1000 dilution and I use secondary HRP-conjugated at 1:2000 dilutions.
Ideally, I use to test them sequentially, but I'm wondering if it's possible to add the 2 antibodies to the incubation buffer (BSA/milk) and test for both in one go?
I would highly appreciate an answer for this. Also, if someone has done it before, I would appreciate the feedback/tips if any.
Thank you
Method of fixing exosomes on a slide, assuming that the membrane is negatively charged, the positive slide attracts exosomes
I want to study CO2 capture simulation on activated carbin filters in a duct how can I find the amount of CO2 adsorb by membrane?
I'm not sure how to interpret or fix the sample so that it creates a normal band. I used Percoll Gradient with density gradients to generate the questionable band. It's supposed to represent basolateral membrane fraction, and most people mentioned that the sample preparation is not good enough, but I'm not sure how I can make it "good enough".
i m wondering about querying data bases or reviewing a couple of papers related to X ray cristallography studies ?
I prepared a membrane for use as a dielectric material using the electrospinning method. their index is as follows: one shows 0.9 under 9 GHz and another 0.83 under 8.5 GHz but one shows 1.03 and another 1.09 under 10 GHz. After that, doubting the result, I re-examined and the same result is repeated. So can anyone give me any advice on this matter?
I am establishing a polarized gastric-epithelial monolayer culture on transwell system for bacterial infection studies. I use NCI-N87 cells and I culture them by replacing medium on every alternative day for 21 days. Later, I confirmed the expression of ZO-1 on 100% methanol (-20C) fixed cells. However, I face the following issues during this process.
1. How to avoid membrane curling while I cut off the membrane from the insert to mount on glass slide?
2. When I used 4% formaldehyde as a fixative to stain cell surface proteins, I found few cells or small cell clusters lying over the tight monolayer.
3. Is it necessary to use 21 days grown cells for bacterial infection studies? Because I see many highly cited papers also have used lesser days grown cells.
How to overcome these technicalities?
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Hello everyone,
I want to do a chemotaxis migration assay with PBMCs. I have gone through the literature to find the optimum pore size of the transwell membrane but got confused. Some people have used 8 µm pore size while some others have used 5 µm pore size. Could somebody help me in this regard if working on a similar aspect?
Dear experts and colleagues,
I am facing the ghost test line as shown in the attached photos.
Problems are as follows:
1) The flow was slowed down or stopped at the test line. It could not pass the test line and had to flow beside the test line (the dot).
2) It took time for the test line getting wet.
3) The test line became white (ghost test line)
It seems that the test line became hydrophobic that prevents the flow and interferes with the reaction between the Antibody at test line with the Antigen+ conjugation complex.
I intend to block the membrane by BSA 1%, Tween 20 0.05% in PBS 1X. However, I wonder whether I should immerse the membrane in the blocking solution BEFORE or AFTER dropping the Antibody to the test line? As I understand, I should block before dotting the protein on the membrane but I have read somewhere else that we can do it after immobilizing the protein. Therefore, I would like to confirm it. Please help me. Also, If you have any experiences dealing with these problems, please share your solution if possible. Thank you so much!
Hello everyone, I am seeking guidance on the analysis of scanned films obtained from Proteome Profiler Mouse Cytokine Array Kits, specifically focusing on the quantification of dot intensity using ImageJ. I have successfully scanned the array membranes, which contain dots exhibiting varying intensity levels, ranging from intense to very light. However, I am facing challenges in determining the optimal method for selecting the appropriate area for intensity measurement, particularly due to the variability in dot intensity across the membranes.
I am uncertain about the most suitable approach for measuring dot intensity and comparing them across the membranes. Considering the diverse range of dot intensities present on the membranes, I am unsure whether to fix the area for intensity measurement or adopt a different approach.
I would greatly appreciate guidance or recommendations on how to effectively analyse the scanned films to quantify dot intensity using any available protocol or instruction using ImageJ. Specifically, I am seeking insights on selecting the appropriate area for intensity measurement, taking into account the presence of both intense and light dots.
I have attached a sample image of the scanned film for reference, and I am more than willing to provide additional details or clarification upon request.
Please provide information on where I can purchase a 150 kDa, 500 kDa, 1000 KDa and 5000 KDa molecular weight cutoff membrane? for separation of ferulic acid (194 mwt) form mixtue of sample. where almost other molecular wt cut of is ranginng form 100 - 150.
I need to separate egg membrane and calcium form a egg, Pleas help me.
So we have used different membranes and increased the protein concentration to 80mcg during the protein estimation and even though it's been always showing, we have not had any luck getting their expression lately for some reason.
I want to ask if you can easily determine if the membrane surface you have modified is already successful just by physical observation / marks? are there any marks that will tell you that you have successfully done IP? For example, square mark. Because you only modified that area. But in my case sometimes the back part of the membrane still got wet after I tried to remove the binder clips after modification so I was worried if it could affect the success of my IP modification on membrane's surface. It should only occur on top layer only... thanks a lot for your answers in advance!
Hi, I am Abdul Samad, researching graphene oxide nanomaterials. I have synthesized graphene oxide by Hammer's method, and now I want to develop a graphene oxide membrane. I have tried to develop a membrane using the vacuum filtration method, but this method didn't work. Can anyone suggest the assay, accessible, and best method of fabrication of graphene oxide water filtration membrane?
Also, can anyone suggest the best dispersion agent for graphene oxide?
Hi
Does anyone know which dye can be used for staining exosome membranes, aside from PKH67?
Thank you in advance for your help
I have tried several time for casting a membrane polymer in NMP solvent over hot air oven and hot plate for making membrane thin film but every time I failed to make it,it form a sticky gel like one instead of film.What could be the problem ,is there any alternative method available for this.
Problem
After Transferring the membrane picture with Ponceau S Staining looks like the membrane is burning and has poor transfer. Can someone help with this?
I also noticed something weird on the gel after the transfer, it seems there are some blue spots with Coomassie Blue staining.
Gel condition
12% gel
I load 30 ug protein in each lane with six samples and two ladders separately.
Transfer condition
Wet method: 19-hour/constant 30V at working fridge (4 degrees) with ice bucket
PVDF membrane active with the methanol > 1 mins
The transfer buffer is fresh with 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 20%methaol but make a 10* stock solution of transfer buffer, which is 250mM Tris 1920mP Glycine, then add 700ml ddh20 and 200ml Methanol to make 1L transfer buffer.
Picture
1. Picture with PVDF membrane after Ponceau S Staining
2. gel with Coomassie Blue staining after transfer
3. sandwich wet method: only show sponge/ two filter paper/ gel/ (start from black Sponge two filter paper, gel, membrane, two filter paper, Sponge)
4. gel after electrophoresis.
Hello¸
Im PhD Student in UQTR ( Canada), I have a crucial experience for my project thesis : I have a WB (western blot) membrane that I need to store for a long time for incubation with other antibodies (Precisely Ubiquitin) . I read that I can put it in a bag at -20C.
I want just to confirm if I did it correctly (see picture) or there are other ways.
Thanks in advance
Ayoub
Numerous studies have used the hRBC membrane stability assay to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of a certain compound or extract. I have also read that the membrane of lysosome and erythrocytes are comparable in terms of stability. Upon further reading, I think that there might also be a lot of differences between their membranes, especially the number and composition of the membrane lipids and proteins. These differences may reduce the reliability of the assay.
Is the hRBC membrane stabilization assay more of a screening method for anti-inflammatory activity? And are there studies that have intricately discussed and compared lysosome and erythrocytes membranes to support the validity of hRBC assay for measuring anti-inflammatory activity?
I'm doing RNA dot blot with NC membrane. But its seems like something wrong with crosslinking.
I'm wondering
1. If I need to use SSC buffer to treat with membrane before dotting? and what X of SSC buffer should I use?
2. Should I increase the time of UV crosslinking (125 mJoule/cm2 at 254 nM, 60 sec)?
The detailed Western Blot procedure
The membrane is first rinsed briefly with 20ml of TBS, followed by a 30-minute incubation, shaking with 10ml of Blocking Buffer. During this incubation, the volume of primary antibody needed for a 1:5000 dilution into 10ml of blocking buffer is calculated, and 10ml of blocking buffer is prepared for the antibody. Subsequently, the Blocking Buffer is removed, and the membrane is incubated for 45 minutes, shaking with 10ml of primary antibody in Blocking Buffer (Rabbit anti-ADH diluted 1:5000). After removing the antibody, the membrane is washed three times for 5 minutes each with 10ml of Blocking Buffer. Meanwhile, a 1:5000 dilution of the secondary antibody in 10ml of blocking buffer is prepared. The membrane is then incubated for 45 minutes, shaking with 10ml of secondary antibody in Blocking Buffer (Alkaline Phosphatase conjugated Goat anti Rabbit diluted 1:5000). Following the antibody removal, the membrane undergoes three 5-minute washes with 10ml of TBS/T. Finally, 5ml of BCIP/NBT liquid substrate (Sigma-B1911) is added, and incubation continues until color develops, with the reaction being stopped by rinsing with distilled water.
I was told I might have washed it with a different TBS (10mM one instead of 5mM)
What could the reason for such a different bands on the well.
Hello, dear, Researchers,
I am a newbie in this membrane field.'
I would like to ask if anyone of you has tried doing this? Can you share some methods / paper? Thank you very much!!!
My solid surface is polymer membrane has same molecules that can detect using ATR-FTIR and XPS. I want to use alternative of it.
If a have a sequence of a multi-pass transmembrane protein and I would like to see how this sequence will be translated and folded across the cell membrane, what would you recommend? Thank you so much in advance, I'm new in the field and would appreciate any kind of suggestion.
I am working on identification of copy number in a recombinant Chinese hamster cell line by southern hybridization. I am having issues with the transfer of DNA onto positively charged nylon membrane. As indicated in the gel image, a lot of DNA is still observed in the gel post transfer to the membrane manually. I have loaded around 18-20 ug of genomic DNA in each lane (2, 3, and 5). I have used 10X SSC buffer for the transfer of the DNA, and the transfer time was around 18 hrs. Kindly suggest me ways to improve the transfer efficiency of the DNA onto the membrane, so that there will be good amount of DNA on the membrane to give pick up signal. I have been using DIG labeled probe for detection, I am either getting a very faint signal or no signal. Thank you.
I am currently producing membranes with a rough thickness of 15-40 µm and want to measure and compare them reliably. My desired accuracy is < 1 µm (e.g., 0.3 µm) or something in that region. I am looking for a tool/method/device that is not overly expensive, like SEM, but still gets the job done.
What is Your suggestion?
Hi
I am working on lair2 and it's interaction with C1q to understand who that affect lupus.
We used cell line to produce lair2 . than we transfected it with c1q.
and now we are doing western blot , to detect the two proteins, the first time we incubate them with c1q antibody . and we see the two proteins . after that we used the same membrane to detect lair2 , we wash the membrane and incubate it with lair 2 antibody and we see the protein .
we used 2 negative controls , in the first detection we saw two faint bands in them . in the second one we didn't see them.
I don't know what's the problem , and how to analyze it?
What solvent should be used to precipitate out the copolymer of vinyl pyridine and vinyl carbazole in NMP.I tried deionised water,ethyl acetate everything but unfortunately it doesnt get settle down.
Hello,
I'm operating an FDFO system using an RO membrane. We use commercial PES UF support and apply TFC (already tried out lots of TFC recipes). RPM is in the range of 50-100. What I cannot figure out is that we cannot have an increase in flux. What could be the reason? I tried several modifications such as temperature increase in feed and draw, changing RPM etc.
Thank you from now
Fabricating PEG and PVP blended PES membrane.
Dear all,
as asked above:
I'm dealing with a porous carbon based membrane for the separation of water vapour from a gas stream at elevated temperatures between 120 and 220 °C.
I'm conducting experiments (adsorption and permeation) in order to have a solid data base.
I think a good starting point for the modeling approach would be to use the solution diffusion approach of dense membranes. From my first trials it's becoming visible, that the capillary effect and surface adsorption in the capillaries plays an important role in the diffusion process.
Do you think this approach is worthwhile and physically sane?
Do you have a good starting point (e.g. papers, models, etc) for me at hand?
Thanks all for your thoughts and help
If a protein locates at the inner membrane of mitochondria, and then it will be cleaved and released to intermembrane space of mitochondria, what is the fate of that part of protein still locate at the inner membrane?
Hello,
I have a problem when revealing my western blots ! I use biorad LF PVDF membranes with the Biorad transfer system (in 7 min) I block with the Biorad blocking solution then I incubate with the primary anticorp and I reveal again with the Biorad SB 700 rabbit. Nevertheless, the membranes appear as they do here, and it's easy to understand why!
It's been a while since I changed all the solutions I usually use, but we still manage to get this profile!
has anyone encountered this problem before?
thanks for your help
I am experiencing issues with the expression of phosphorylated proteins in my western blot experiments. Specifically, I observe strong phosphorylated protein expression but no expression of the corresponding total proteins in the same samples. For example, I detect phosphorylated STAT1 (pSTAT1) but not total STAT1 protein. Similar results were obtained for pSTAT3 and STAT3. I have thoroughly searched online but have been unable to find a possible explanation for this phenomenon.
I would greatly appreciate any advice or suggestions from anyone who has encountered a similar issue.
Here is my experimental protocol:
- Prepared single cell suspensions from fresh mouse spleens using a buffer containing 1x PBS, 2% FBS, EDTA, and antibiotics.
- Washed the cells once with ice-cold PBS and then lysed them using RIPA buffer (with proteinase and phosphatase inhibitors) by vortexing for 10 seconds every 5 minutes on ice, repeated 4 times.
- Quantified the protein concentration using the BCA assay and mixed 30 micrograms of protein with loading dye, boiling the mixture at 90℃ for 10 minutes.
- Transferred the proteins to membranes and blocked the membranes with BSA at room temperature for one hour on a shaker.
- Washed the membranes three times with TBST containing 0.2% Tween-20.
- Incubated the membranes with primary antibodies overnight at 4℃ on a shaker.
- Washed the membranes three times with TBST containing 0.2% Tween-20.
- Incubated the membranes with secondary antibodies at room temperature on a shaker.
- Washed the membranes three times with TBST containing 0.2% Tween-20.
- After detecting phosphorylated proteins, stripped the membranes by adding deionized water and microwaving for four minutes.
- Blocked the membranes with BSA and incubated them with primary antibodies.
I need Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane for my experimental purpose. I checked the product with Sigma-Aldrich, Himedia, Milipore and other vendors in India but there is no mention about the product in their catalog. Vendors are available for Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) but not for PDMS membranes.
Can anyone suggest me some Indian vendors for the same from where I can purchase the product?
What is the use of hydrophilic polymer membrane in packaging industry? what type of packaging can be performed if membrane is hydrophilic in nature?
I tried to detect my recombinant protein using dot blot. After spotting the cell lysate onto the membrane, I let it dry at room temperature for 1 hour, and then proceeded with blocking and incubation using antibodies similar to Western blot. However, it seems that my protein couldn't bind to the membrane. Before blocking, I could observe the spots where I dropped the lysate. After blocking, those spots smeared and disappeared. Upon visualization, there was no signal at all, only some smearing. I also dropped the His-tag protein marker as a positive control, but that spot also smeared. I tried with both nitrocellulose and PVDF membranes, but the results were the same.
It is possible to have some insight concerning the possible removal mechanism.
I need resources that explain ways to combine membrane separation and electrochemical technologies for wastewater treatment. Explain fully including advantages and disadvantages, reactions and how to combine.
For the western Blot, I need to check another antibody in my membrane but this antibody is from the same species as the first antibody so how can I do that without stripping? (Note: two antibodies are around 15 KDa away from each other.)
Have you any data about the operating costs of CERAMIC membranes over for example 50 years? what about sand filter and polymeric membranes? The use of all of them is after coagulation, but for sand filter we have clarifier. For MF CERAMIC membranes (or polymeric membranes), the filter will act as clarifier. Any data for any types of CERAMIC membranes (MF, UF, ...) can be useful.
How can I analyze the lipid and protein content of a virus membrane or envelope? Are there any commercially available kits specifically designed to isolate the envelope from the virus, enabling further examination of the virus's lipid and protein composition?
Thanks.
Dear colleagues,
Good day to you all. I'd like to start the adventure of electrospinning. My intention is to develop membranes for water purification. The biggest challenge to start with is the right equipment, how best to approach this? Is it possible to create it myself, is it better to buy new or buy used? I would also appreciate advice on the membrane formation itself.
Thanks for your answers.
I have fabricated membranes with a specific thickness for wastewater purification.
How can I calculate the pore size of the membranes and it's flux rate (pure water flux and permeate flux)?
Please provide a reference article.
I looking for information about the procedures or the method of coating GO-TiO2 (dip-coating) or (Layer-by-Layer) on the commercial PES or PVDF membrane. No manufacturing of the membrane by membrane casting or other. Mostly, I found the fabrication membrane modification of GO-TiO2 by membrane casting method.
I took SEM pictures of my clean 0.2um pore size PES membrane filter. The first picture is coated with 5nm gold, and the second is with 20 nm carbon. Both pictures are 2500X magnification, and the scale is 4um. I wonder why the two pictures look significantly different. The picture I coated with gold doesn't look like the pore size is 0.2um.
Thanks,
I am trying to detect the phosphorylated IKK protein using Western Blot. I induced the cells by 10ug/ml LPS for 20 min. I loaded approximately 25 μg of total lysate and ran the gel. After gel transfer, I blocked the membrane using 5% BSA in TBST (0.1% Tween-20) for 2 hours. Then, I incubated the membrane with a primary antibody (diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer as recommended by the manufacturer) at 4 degrees overnight. Next, I washed the membrane three times for 5 minutes each with TBST. Following that, I added a secondary antibody (diluted 1:2000) and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Finally, I washed the membrane three times for 5 minutes each with TBST before proceeding with chemiluminescent visualization.
However, I have been encountering a problem where I observe numerous nonspecific bands, and my desired band appears to be very faint. I attempted to address this issue by blocking the membrane for a longer duration using 7% BSA, but it did not make any difference. Have you encountered a similar problem with the detection of phosphorylated proteins, and if so, what solutions would you recommend? Thank you!
I read that in order to facilitate the production of huge amounts of membrane for oxygenic photosynthesis, that is, taking place with the release of oxygen (as opposed to anoxygenic photosynthesis) and the change taking place in plants and cyanobacteria from phospholipids to glyceroglycolipids as the main component of membranes, may have given cyanobacteria an evolutionary advantage, because the availability of phosphate, which is used in the synthesis of phospholipids, it is limited.
I found that information, but I am not sure where and do you have maybe more information about that in articles etc.
I have a western blot that I am visualizing with a colorimetric solution and I have no bands. I know there is something on the membrane however, because I stained it after transfer. I blocked in skim, applied primary 12-24 hours, applied secondary 75 minutes, and visualized. On the first trial secondary stayed on quite a bit longer, and I had no result. Nothing at all showed up on the membrane. The second trial, I did the secondary for exactly 75 minutes, visualized, and nothing showed EXCEPT my ladder. So, now I know the secondary and visualization worked, but maybe not the primary? I have never had issues with this primary before, so I am not sure. Aside from there simply not being any of the specific protein on there, I am trying to look at other angles first. I can attach my pictures of membranes after visualizing, the first trial is the cloudy/bubbly looking one, the second is the one with the ladder.
PDVF membrane incorporated with CuO nanoparticles can be suitable for what degradation ?
Hello everyone, I hope you're doing well. Have you ever encountered a situation like this? Recently, I added 30ug/well protein sample and ran the 7.5% gel with 90v 30min (stacking) 130v 70min (resolving gel). After transferring with nc 0.2um membrane, wet transfer 90v 60min, I did the ponceau staining. Sadly, the staining showed nothing with my sample. Although the ladder looks nice on the membrane, I'm pretty sure that the transfer is working. I've never faced this before, and I'm puzzled.
I noticed some fade smears on the top of each lane, but no bands below. Does it mean that I have no protein on each well? But I checked the samples with BCA assay, and the concentration was good. Or could it be that the proteins degraded, and I can still get the concentration? Additionally, I would like to share that these are human lung samples. When we first extracted protein and ran the western blot, it got smears on every lane and did not show any bands. Does it mean that the protein degraded in the beginning?
I'm really concerned and wondering what could have happened to my samples. If anyone has any insights, it's my pleasure to hear your ideas.
I'm working with an integral membrane protein that we want to express and purify for structure/function studies. The full-length gene is cloned into a pET vector with a C-terminal His6 tag. We get fantastic expression in E. coli C43(DE3), but when blotting lysates and crude membrane fractions, there is only weak blotting at the top of the gel/membrane.
When membranes are re-solubilized in detergent and assessed by SDS-PAGE, there is a large and prominent band just smaller than the expected size of the recombinant that does not bind a Ni column. Several prominent, high MW bands are present in crude membranes and to a lesser extent in detergent-reconstituted membranes. Digest and LC/MS of the soluble species confirms that it's the recombinant protein, but C-terminally truncated so lacking the tag. The truncated region contains an important active site motif, so the truncated form is also inactive in assays when purified.
I have a few ideas to obtain the full-length form (cell-free translation, denaturing purification) but was curious if anyone had experienced something similar and had used an approach to prevent truncation in a similar case. We can map the likely site of proteolysis from the LC/MS data, but not sure what to do with that information.
In other words how I can ensure the coated layer adhere to the membrane strongly
Hi, I’m doing transwell migration with B16F10 cells recently. But I ran into a problem after staining with 1% crystal violet, some dirty print showed in background (shown as figures). What could it be? How could I clean it?
I used a 8.0 μm insert in 24 well plate and my steps are briefly as followed:
1. Seed 4*10^4 B16F10 cells with 100 ul serum free medium to the upper compartment of the insert.
2. Add 0.6ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS to the lower chamber as attractant.
3. After Incubation for 24 hours, take the insert out carefully. Remove cells in the upper compartment of the insert by gently wiping the upper side of the membrane with a cotton swab.
4. Fix the cells on the lower side of the insert membrane with 100% methanol for 10 min, followed by staining with 1% crystal violet in methanol for additional 20 min.
5. Wash the insert in PBS for several seconds to remove excess dye.
6. Remove excess dye and cells in the upper compartment of the insert by gently wiping the upper side of the membrane with a cotton swab.
7. Observe under a microscope.
BTW, when I did transwell migration with HOS cells (2*10^4 cells/well), the background was clean.
The delaminated T3C2X2 MXene solution was ~ 2 mg/mL. 50 mL of the above solution was filtered through 0.22 nm PTFE membrane and dried in vaccum at RT over night. But the film was not free-stranding. What is the problem? Concentration? PTFE membrane?
I completed a western blot and during detection, there were black dots all over the membrane on the output. What could have caused this?
how to adjust Signal Amplitude and Frequency Range so as not to have an overload result in EIS measurement for chitosan membrane?
Hello, we have been struggling with the lots of background in our wb membranes probed with an anti-Streptavidin-HRP from Thermofisher (Pierce 21134). Samples contained biotinilated proteins. Every time there is some blobs somewhere and so much background that it is hard so see our biotinilated proteins. I attached the same pic with different contrast. Did anyone face the same problem?
All stepts have been performed with PBS 1X and here the protocol:
- After transfer, rinse off membrane for 5 min in PBS
- Block with BSA blocking buffer (1% filtered BSA and 0.2% Triton x-100 in PBS) for 30 min
- incubation with streptavidin antibody 1:2000 dilution ON at 4C
- Rinse off with PBS three times and do ABS blocking (10% adult bovin serum and 1% triton x-100 in PBS) for 5 min
- Rinse off with PBS three times and incubate with PBS for 5 min
- Develop with ECL for 5 min and acquire
Hi everyone, just I said above Does anyone know a supplier of PDMS (silicone) Hollow fiber membrane?. I need to buy per meter of this product
Hello fellow researchers,
I'm having a puzzling problem in my Western blot experiment, can somebody help me? I conducted an experiment using prefrontal cortex samples, following a WB protocol that has previously yielded successful results (We took quite some time to standardize each step). However, this time around, I'm facing a situation where I'm not able to detect any bands, despite thoroughly checking various aspects of my protocol.
Here are some key details:
- My samples were homogeneized in RIPA buffer + proteases inhibitors as usual, and are relatively fresh, I homogenezeid last month, and I am realizing western blot with those samples since that.
- I run my electrophoresis in BioRad system, at 150V, 400mA, 2h, room temperature (10% acrylamide gel)
- I transfered to nitrocelulose membranes in semy dry transfer 30V, 1h, 164mA, room temperature
- I performed a Ponceau staining and confirmed that the samples were transferred correctly to the membrane (image is attached)
- I used three different antibodies in those membranes in the first time (I cut the membranes in three different sizes), it didn't work and I thought that it could be a old antibody solution problem. So I stripped the membranes and I incubated with new antibodies solutions (I got three new and sealed antibodies, including the secondaries) and none of them resulted in detectable bands.
- I was very careful to see that I incubated the correct primary antibodies, with their respective secondary antibodies
- Blocking (BSA 5%) and washing steps (3x with TBS-T) have been successful in previous experiments with those antibodies of the same brand.
- The protein quantity in the samples appears adequate, as good bands were visible in the Ponceau staining.
- I'm using high-quality and well-maintained Super-ECL reagent.
I'm completely stumped by this situation, especially because even the internal control protein, beta-actin, is not being detected. If anyone has faced a similar issue or has suggestions on what else I can investigate, please share your insights. Any assistance or guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your attention and help!
Nicolle Platt
Hello,
I'm struggling to comprehend how the current measured in a double voltage clamp experiment corresponds to the entry of ammonium ions while investigating an ammonium transporter. Is the current primarily driven by ammonium ions, and would this current be absent without their presence? I'm seeking a clearer understanding of the origin of the current and how the transport of ammonium ions across the membrane via the transporter influences the observed current.
Thanks
RIPA is the best way to get the membrane bound proteins right?
But has anyone tested Trizol isolated proteins to see if we get membrane proteins?
Dear all!
I think the main functions of pores are to avoid the contact of the two different liquids and just allow the passage of ions, so I think the pore size should be small enough to block the liquid, although the solvated ions must pass through it.
For glass frits, in the following link, you can find a table showing the different nominal ranges of pore sizes in micrometers
Best
Marco
I am working with chitosan membrane for food packaging and among all the papers i have read no one has mentioned this problem. how to over come this probem of folding membrane?
Good day to whom it may concern!
I wanted to build a simple PEM electrolyzer, could you suggest a good synthesis for the proton exchange membrane?
I work in a electrochemical laboratory, so normally I should be able to find the components for the synthesis if they are not really rare.
Thanks
I am synthesizing a membrane for Li+ adsorption, in some papers they mention to filtrate first (0.22 micro filter syringe) then do acid digestion, others don't. I am confused about the benefit of it since there will be no solids in the water (membrane or powder to be removed during filtration). Thanks!
I'm encountering difficulties when it comes to quantifying the blue-stained cells in the image I've provided. These blue-stained elements represent cells, while the remaining particles are pores originating from the membrane of 24-well inserts. My goal is to eliminate these pores and isolate the cells. Is there a method available to remove the pores and exclusively highlight the cells in the image? Any assistance with this task would be highly valued.
Hello, I need to stain some primary culture cells in permeabilized and non-permeabilized conditions to test if a protein is localizing to the exterior of the cell membrane. Our existing fixation protocol for this is to use ice cold 4%PFA for 5 minutes, but some lab members have had issues with the PFA permeabilizing the membrane. Does anybody have any recommendations for an alternative fixation protocol that would maintain membrane integrity?
Who can advise how to carry out experiments on membrane adsorption of hollow fibers?to carry out experiments on membrane adsorption of hollow fibers?
Dear researchers,
I bought some membrane production materials like PVDF, DMF, DMAc, PEG200, PVP, SiO2, etc.
How can I prove that these materials are pure and not from industrial grades or counterfeit materials available in the market with reputable brands?
What tests can I take for each of them like FTIR, XRD, etc.
Regards
Do we need any pretreatment of proton exchange membrane before using it. if yes then what is the procedure? and please give information about if the water pass through proton exchange membrane as when we are keeping the water level higher in one side of the membrane after some time the level in both side of the membrane becomes equal.
So my question or doubt is that if some product will be formed on either side, will it not allow to pass through it. and how is it able to exchange only proton ? although it is exchanging the water through it.
In this article, they the used this equation CCe = (Fe*Pp*Np)+(Fe*PVp*nv)
to calculate the Elements capital cost in the pressure vessel for RO membrane.
(membrane + pressure vessels)
What is the corrective factor (Fe) in this equation?
currently I am modeling the membrane reactor. hydrogen (reaction product) as a permeated substance. when modeling a packed bed reactor I use:
D=(U*Dp)/(11*(1+(19.4*((Dp/(d1*2))^2))))
D= diffusion coefficient
U=velocity
DP=catalyst diameter
d1=reactor diameter (to membrane line)
to calculate the effective radial diffusion coefficient in packed bed (m2/s) and the results are in accordance with experimental.
but when modeling the membrane packed bed reactor, the simulation experienced an error.
Are there any suggestions regarding the diffusion coefficient equation for permeated substances that is more suitable for me to use?
Your answer will be greatly appreciated.
I need to build a low-cost airflow humidifier which would not have a direct contact between water and the air to be humidified (i.e. not a bubbler or sponge). The "state of the art" on this are hollow-fiber cartridges containing hundreds of nafion tubes, but these are too costly for my application. Since regenerated cellulose (RC) dialysis membranes are permeable to water molecules (I've concentrated proteins through them), I wonder if transport of water through a RC dialysis tube may be efficient enough. Dialysis bags and cartridges are widely available.
The CO2 desorption in MOFs is performed by heating or applying low pressure(vacuum). It is observed that by incorporating MOFs in polymeric membranes, the CO2 selectivity increases in general. My question is that how desorption of CO2 occurs in continues permeation process? each time when MOF-based membrane is used at displays higher CO2 selectivity. so, why the MOfs saturated with CO2 do not show reduced selectivity in MOF-based membranes in continues permeation process?
Do you have any suggestion how to get rid these non specific bands?
These are my protocols:
1. Osteoblast cells were cultured in 100-mm cell culture dishes in serum-deprived α-MEM overnight.
2. TNF-α were then added to the dishes for specific periods (0, 6h, 12h, 18h, and 24 h) in serum-deprived α-MEM.
3. Then, washed twice with ice cold PBS and lysed using RIPA buffer (Millipore, Burlington) containing 1% protease and phosphatase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford,).
4. Protein were treated with β-mercaptoethanol and laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, CA) and denatured at 95 ◦C for 5 min as a preparation for SDS-PAGE.
5. 50 ug were loaded into gels 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules,) and transferred to a PVDF Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad, Hercules).
6. The membranes were blocked in Block-Ace (DS Pharma Biomedical, Osaka, Japan) for 1 h at room temperature and were probed AGTR1 Rabbit polyclonal Ab, phospho-SAPK/JNK (Proteintech; 1:1000 dilution) overnight at 4◦C.
7. The membranes were washed in TBS-T and TBS, then incubated with anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked Antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA; 1:5000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature.
8. The membranes were washed in TBS-T and TBS again, then incubated with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
Here I attach the figure. The protein that I want to get has MW of 41 kDA.
Thank you so much for your kind help.
Currently, I looking for the information about the hot topic membrane modification by using graphene oxide. Because I believe that graphene oxide have a good properties and easy to modify in membrane.
In the membrane distillation process, a spacer/mesh is used to prevent the membrane from sticking to the surface of the module. On which side of the membrane should this spacer be placed? on the surface of the membrane (in contact with feed) or behind the membrane (in contact with distilled water).
I am currently engaged in modeling the desalination performance of Cellulose Acetate (CA)/Graphene Oxide (GO)/POSS Mixed Matrix Membranes (MMMs) for reverse osmosis (RO) applications. The primary objective of my research is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the transport phenomena and rejection mechanisms within the membrane, utilizing the Donnan-Steric Pore Model (DSPM). As part of this endeavor, I am seeking to determine the effective membrane thickness.
During the membrane preparation process, I have acquired information that the solutions of composite membranes were cast onto a non-woven Hollytex polyester substrate taped to a clean glass plate with 250 μm thicknesses using casting knife. However, I am curious if there exists any way to determine the effective thickness of the membrane without resorting to experimental methods.
The membrane distillation modules I work with have large dimensions and large membranes must be made. But in some membranes, a few tiny holes are created in different parts of the membrane, possibly due to dust or any other unknown reason. Is there a method to block these two or three small holes and use the membrane? Otherwise, I have to throw away the perforated membranes and fabricate new membranes again.
Best regards
Why the surface of electrospun fiber membrane be easily peeled off like a spider web, and layered with the fiber membrane below ? The polymer is PAN, the solvent is DMF, with a concentration of 12% and a receiving distance of 12cm. Is it because of high humidity?
I am researching in the direction of composite membranes for gas separation membranes, and one question I have is: when doing things like FT-IR, XPS, and TG, is it necessary to cast the membrane layer separately (without the support layer), and will this have an effect on it? I have done FT-IR tests, and some of the effects are not obvious, but when testing for TG, it's not clear to me whether I should remove the support layer or not. On some references I found that this issue is not written about
I did a western blot yesterday, and I loaded two groups of the same samples in one gel, only separating them when I was incubating the primary antibody. The results show that my GAPDH is clean in low background, but my target gene is not clean in high background. Although they are from the same membrane and I treat them in the exact same condition.
Does anyone possibly know the reason?
Thank you!
Below are my target protein(smad2) and my GAPDH.
Is 1 Kilodaltons dialysis membrane is reusable for same sample? is tube or membrane is suitable for large quantity carbon dots filtration.\?
I am working with a protein located in the mitochondrial inner membrane, and I would like to know in which conditions should I perform the denaturation step... maybe the "standard" denaturation at 95ºC-100ºC for 5 minutes does not work for that kind of proteins.
Thank you very much.
in a typical MFC H+ ions will form in anode chamber. it is supposed to go through the membrane to the cathode.
many of the research papers use CEM. how is it possible, since H+ and NH4+ are the cations, to be passed through PEM?
or
proton exchange membranes do transfer cations as well?
someone, please clarify this......
I expressed a GFP protein with my protein in Agrobacteria, I guess this protein will localization in the outer membrane, but the results are very confusing, does any friend know where the GFP localization is? Many thanks.
I have read that I can use RIPA buffer for EV membrane disruption. Does this have to be followed by ultra centrifugation? Does anyone have a protocol for this?
Thanks.
Dear All,
I am wondering how the Transwell inserts can be recovered from fixing to be then embedded?
After fixing, I put each membrane on nitrocellulose membrane to avoid curling and then I leave them in an embedding cassette to be processed - automated protocol of our histology facility.
When embedding, I cut each membrane into half and put them upright. This process is very difficult because the Transwells start curling and they are very thin, so they don't settle very well. Also, when sectioning, Transwells would break because of their thickness.
Do you have any alternative on how to manage them before processing and then embed?
Thank you!
Aurora
I filtered sodium dodecyl sulfate in buffer solutions through a PES membrane. After that, I took some SEM images of my sample to visualize organic particles fouling on membrane. Here is one of my SEM image. I'm not sure if that looks like organic fouling. need some help. Thanks,
what are the functions of F1 particles in mitochondria ?