Science topic

Molecular Biological Techniques - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Molecular Biological Techniques, and find Molecular Biological Techniques experts.
Questions related to Molecular Biological Techniques
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
I am performing a KO of my gene by frameshift in zebrafish. I have been screening this by the disruption of a restriction enzyme site in a PCR fragment. I now have an incross of 2 mutant fish and am hoping raise the progeny and get some homozygous fish. I will use DNA from tissue sample as the PCR template but I am wondering how I can separate homozygous from heterozygous. In my experience so far the F1 generation from an outcross with wild type showed an extremely faint undigested band (wt DNA) compared to the really bright digested band (indicating mut DNA) for some reason even though an outcross should automatically result in heterozygous fish containing both wt & mut (digested & undigested) DNA. I presumed that the concentration of the mut & wt allele would be similar. Has anyone come across this difficulty before. Could there be a reason a mutant would amplify more in a PCR reaction (it is only 7 bp shorter)? Any suggestions for a way to tell the difference? I am concerned since the band is so faint on heterozygotes I may misidentify heterozygotes as homozygotes.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Esteemed Colleague,
Greetings. I trust this message finds you well and engrossed in the cutting-edge realm of genome editing, particularly employing CRISPR-Cas9 technology. Your inquiry about separating homozygous from heterozygous mutations post-CRISPR is both crucial and timely for ensuring the precision and efficacy of genetic modifications. Below, I provide a comprehensive guide outlining methodologies for distinguishing between these genetic variants, thereby enhancing the resolution of your CRISPR-based experiments.
Overview
The CRISPR-Cas9 system enables targeted genomic alterations with high specificity. Following the introduction of CRISPR-Cas9 components into cells, the repair of the induced double-strand break can result in modifications leading to homozygous or heterozygous alleles. Determining the zygosity of these modifications is essential for characterizing the functional consequences of the edits.
Methodologies for Zygosity Determination
  1. PCR and Sanger Sequencing:Procedure: Amplify the target region surrounding the CRISPR-induced modification using PCR, followed by Sanger sequencing of the PCR products. Analysis: Compare the sequencing chromatogram of the edited sample to that of a wild-type control. Homozygous mutations will show a single, clean peak at the modification site, whereas heterozygous mutations will display overlapping peaks, indicating the presence of both the wild-type and edited alleles.
  2. Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) Analysis:Procedure: If the CRISPR edit introduces or abolishes a restriction enzyme site, perform a PCR to amplify the target region, followed by digestion with the appropriate restriction enzyme. Analysis: Resolve the digested PCR products on an agarose gel. The pattern of bands will differ between homozygous and heterozygous alleles based on the presence or absence of the restriction site.
  3. T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI) Assay:Procedure: Amplify the target region via PCR and denature and reanneal the PCR products to form mismatched duplexes if both edited and wild-type alleles are present. Treat the reannealed products with T7 Endonuclease I, which cleaves mismatched DNA. Analysis: Homozygous edits will not generate cleavage products, whereas heterozygous edits will result in a cleavage pattern visible on an agarose gel, indicating the presence of mismatches.
  4. Digital Droplet PCR (ddPCR):Procedure: Design allele-specific probes for ddPCR that can distinguish between the wild-type and edited alleles. Analysis: Quantify the absolute number of edited and wild-type alleles. The ratio of these alleles can precisely determine zygosity, with a 1:1 ratio indicating heterozygosity and a predominance of one allele type indicating homozygosity.
  5. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS):Procedure: Perform deep sequencing of the target region in a population of cells. Analysis: Bioinformatic analysis can quantify the proportion of reads representing the wild-type versus edited alleles, providing a detailed assessment of zygosity at the population level. For clonal populations, NGS can definitively characterize the zygosity of individual clones.
Considerations and Best Practices
  • Clonal Isolation: For precise zygosity determination, especially in heterogeneous populations, isolating single clones and expanding them for individual analysis is recommended.
  • Validation: Confirm the editing and zygosity results using multiple, complementary methods when possible to ensure accuracy.
  • Bioinformatic Support: Leverage bioinformatics tools for analyzing complex sequencing data, particularly when using high-throughput methods like NGS.
By employing these strategies, you can accurately determine the zygosity of CRISPR-induced genetic modifications, a critical step in validating the success of your genome editing endeavors and understanding the functional implications of your edits.
Should you require further assistance or wish to delve deeper into any of these methodologies, please do not hesitate to reach out. I am here to support your research journey and contribute to the advancement of genome editing technologies.
Warm regards.
Take a look at this protocol list; it could assist in understanding and solving the problem.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
Hi All, I am transfecting two vectors (one gRNA vector and a HDR vector) to KO a gene. I have puromycin resistant in HDR vector. I am using Fugene for transfection purpose. I was wondering to know how long should I wait to start selection after transfection of the crispr vectors?
Relevant answer
Answer
The timing for starting selection after transfection of CRISPR vectors can depend on various factors, including the specific experimental setup, the type of CRISPR system used, and the characteristics of the target cells. However, here are some general considerations to help you determine when to initiate selection after transfection:
  1. Transfection Efficiency: Allow sufficient time for the CRISPR vectors to be transfected into the target cells and express the components necessary for genome editing (e.g., Cas9 enzyme, sgRNA). Transfection efficiency can vary depending on the transfection method and cell type, but it typically ranges from a few hours to a day.
  2. Expression of CRISPR Components: The timing for initiating selection should ensure that the CRISPR components have had enough time to be expressed and become functional within the cells. This can range from several hours to a day or more, depending on the kinetics of gene expression and protein production in the specific cell type.
  3. Off-Target Effects: Initiating selection too soon after transfection may increase the risk of off-target effects, where the CRISPR system induces unintended mutations at genomic loci with partial sequence homology to the target site. Allowing sufficient time for specific on-target editing to occur before applying selection pressure can help minimize off-target effects.
  4. Cell Proliferation Rate: Consider the proliferation rate of the target cells when determining the timing of selection. Cells with faster proliferation rates may require shorter selection times compared to cells with slower proliferation rates to achieve the desired level of genome editing.
  5. Optimization: Perform pilot experiments or optimization studies to determine the optimal timing for selection in your specific experimental system. Test different time points for initiating selection and assess the efficiency and specificity of genome editing under each condition.
  6. Balancing Selection Pressure and Cell Viability: Initiate selection early enough to exert adequate selection pressure on cells containing the CRISPR-mediated edits while ensuring that cell viability is not compromised. Too long a delay in starting selection may allow unedited or less efficiently edited cells to outgrow edited cells.
Based on these considerations, it's common to start selection for edited cells within 24-48 hours after transfection of CRISPR vectors. However, the optimal timing may vary depending on the specific experimental setup and cell type. It's essential to empirically determine the best timing for selection in your particular experimental context through pilot experiments and optimization studies.
l This list of protocols might help us better address the issue.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
9 answers
I am planning to work with Addgene's pLKO-tet-on plasmid. I checked the protocol on the website and comments left here so far. I am a bit confused. Should I design the oligos exactly in the protocol (5'-CCGG for AgeI and 5'-AATT for EcoRI)? Because it is one bp missing in both RE sites and it results in oligos which have mutant RE sites. If they are mutant, how will the ligation work? I would be really happy if someone could explain me. One more thing, I came across so many people who had troubles of getting positive clones after ligation. I am wondering what is the latest situation. Is there any tricks that I should know? Thank you very much for your answers in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Designing shRNA (short hairpin RNA) oligonucleotides for the pLKO-tet-on plasmid involves several steps to ensure specificity, efficiency, and compatibility with the vector system. The pLKO-tet-on system allows for doxycycline-inducible expression of shRNA, offering controlled gene silencing. Here's a general guide on how to design shRNA oligos for this system:
1. Target Gene Selection
  • Choose the gene you wish to silence. It's crucial to select a target sequence that is unique to your gene of interest to avoid off-target effects.
2. shRNA Sequence Design
  • Target Sequence Length: Typically, 19-21 nucleotides long sequences within the target mRNA are chosen for shRNA design.
  • GC Content: Aim for a GC content of 40-60% to ensure stable shRNA formation and efficient target binding.
  • Blast Search: Use the NCBI BLAST tool to check the specificity of your chosen sequence against the genome of your organism to avoid off-target silencing.
  • Avoid Polypurine Stretches: Sequences with long stretches of Gs or Cs can form strong secondary structures or promote Pol III termination, reducing shRNA efficiency.
3. Loop Sequence
  • A loop sequence is required to connect the sense and antisense strands of the shRNA. A commonly used loop sequence is TTCAAGAGA, but others can also be effective.
4. Termination Signal
  • A string of 5-6 thymidines (T's) acts as a Pol III termination signal and should be added at the end of the antisense strand.
5. Incorporating Overhangs for Cloning
  • The pLKO-tet-on vector uses specific restriction sites for cloning (commonly AgeI and EcoRI). You'll need to add 5' overhangs compatible with these sites to your oligos. For example:Forward oligo: 5'-CCGG(N19 sense sequence)TTCAAGAGA(N19 antisense sequence)TTTTTG-3' Reverse oligo: AATTCAAAAA(N19 reverse complement of antisense sequence)TCTCTTGAA(N19 reverse complement of sense sequence)-3'
  • The CCGG and AATT sequences at the ends of the oligos correspond to the overhangs created by AgeI and EcoRI digestion, respectively.
6. Oligo Synthesis and Cloning
  • Have your designed oligos synthesized by a reputable company. Upon receiving, anneal the oligos to form double-stranded DNA and ligate into the digested pLKO-tet-on vector.
7. Validation
  • After cloning, sequence verify the insert to ensure correct shRNA sequence integration. It's also important to test the efficiency of gene knockdown by your shRNA in a pilot experiment before proceeding with more extensive studies.
8. Inducibility Test
  • Verify the inducibility of your shRNA expression by treating transfected cells with and without doxycycline and measuring the target gene's mRNA and protein levels.
Designing effective shRNA oligos requires careful consideration of the target sequence, shRNA structure, and cloning strategy. The pLKO-tet-on system's inducible nature adds an extra layer of control to your gene silencing experiments, making it a powerful tool for studying gene function.
l Perhaps this protocol list can give us more information to help solve the problem.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
I have generated the lentivirus particles with my GOI. But  did not get transduction efficiency in Jurkat cells post 72 hrs why? any suggestion ?
Particulas: used 24 well plate :
50,000 cells with Polybrene 8ug/ml
Thank you in anticipation
Relevant answer
Answer
Lentiviral transduction is a widely used method for introducing foreign genes into various cell types, including hard-to-transfect cell lines like Jurkat cells. Jurkat cells, a human T lymphocyte cell line, are commonly used in research on T-cell signaling and function. Here are some tips and considerations for successful lentiviral transduction in Jurkat cells based on common practices and literature:
Optimize Multiplicity of Infection (MOI)
  • Multiplicity of Infection (MOI) refers to the ratio of viral particles to target cells. For Jurkat cells, starting with an MOI of 5-10 is common, but this can vary based on the viral titer and the gene of interest. Optimization experiments to find the best MOI for your specific construct and goals are essential.
Use Polybrene
  • Polybrene (hexadimethrine bromide) is a cationic polymer used to enhance viral transduction efficiency by neutralizing charge interactions between the cell surface and viral particles. A final concentration of 4-8 µg/mL is typically used, but high concentrations can be toxic to cells, so optimization is necessary.
Spinoculation
  • Spinoculation (centrifugal transduction) can improve transduction efficiency. This involves centrifuging the cells with the viral supernatant at low speeds (e.g., 800-1,000 g for 1-2 hours at 32°C). However, the optimal conditions (speed, temperature, and duration) should be determined experimentally.
Incubation Time
  • After adding the virus, cells are usually incubated for several hours to overnight to allow for sufficient viral entry. Post-transduction, cells can be refreshed with new media to remove viral particles and polybrene, reducing toxicity.
Selecting Transduced Cells
  • If your lentiviral vector includes a selectable marker (e.g., puromycin resistance), applying the selection drug 48-72 hours post-transduction can help enrich for transduced cells. The optimal concentration and duration of selection should be determined for Jurkat cells in advance.
Assessing Transduction Efficiency
  • Transduction efficiency can be evaluated by flow cytometry if the vector expresses a fluorescent marker (e.g., GFP) or through PCR, Western blot, or functional assays for your gene of interest.
Considerations
  • Jurkat cells are suspension cells, making certain steps (like changing media post-transduction) slightly different from adherent cell protocols.
  • Ensure that the lentiviral vector's promoter is active in T-cells. Some promoters (like CMV) can be silenced in certain cell types.
  • Be aware of biosafety considerations when working with lentiviral vectors. Generally, lentiviral work is conducted under BSL-2 conditions.
Tips for Success
  • Always start with a pilot experiment to optimize the MOI and polybrene concentration.
  • Consider using a lentiviral vector with a reporter gene to easily monitor transduction efficiency and optimize conditions before using your experimental vector.
  • Ensure your lentiviral preparation is of high quality and titer. Poor-quality virus can lead to low transduction efficiency and high cell death.
Collaborating with a lab experienced in lentiviral transduction or consulting the literature for protocols specific to Jurkat cells can also provide valuable insights and help troubleshoot common issues.
l This list of protocols might help us better address the issue.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
I am working on unknown large plasmids (50-500 kb) that I need to characterize. I plan to use the Large Construct kit for extracting them and remove chromosomal DNA.
1) Will I see large plasmids on a gel???
2) Is Primer Walking a good approach?
Is there any other methods less time consuming?
NGS will be done but I want to confirm using Sanger Sequencing.
Thanks,
Relevant answer
Answer
Sequencing large plasmids, which can range from a few thousand to over a hundred thousand base pairs, presents a challenge due to their size and complexity. However, there are several effective methods for sequencing large plasmids:
  1. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS):Illumina Sequencing: This technique provides high-throughput, accurate, and cost-effective sequencing. It involves fragmenting the plasmid DNA, sequencing these fragments, and then assembling the sequences using bioinformatics tools. However, repetitive regions can be challenging to assemble. Long-Read Sequencing (PacBio and Oxford Nanopore): These technologies generate longer reads, which are particularly useful for sequencing large plasmids and resolving complex regions. PacBio's SMRT sequencing and Oxford Nanopore's technology can produce reads over 10,000 base pairs long, aiding in spanning repetitive sequences and simplifying assembly.
  2. Sanger Sequencing:While this method is more traditional and has lower throughput, it is highly accurate for shorter DNA sequences. For large plasmids, a strategy of 'primer walking' can be used, where sequential rounds of sequencing are conducted, each starting where the last one left off.
  3. Hybrid Approaches:Combining short-read (e.g., Illumina) and long-read (e.g., PacBio or Nanopore) sequencing can provide both the accuracy of short-read sequencing and the long-read ability to span complex regions. This approach can effectively resolve the structure of large plasmids.
  4. Optical Mapping:Technologies like BioNano Genomics provide large-scale, high-resolution mapping of DNA. While not sequencing per se, optical mapping can help in assembling and validating the plasmid structure, especially useful for very large or complex plasmids.
The choice of method depends on the specific requirements of the project, such as the size of the plasmid, the complexity of its sequence (like the presence of repetitive elements), the required accuracy, and the available budget. For most purposes, a combination of high-throughput short-read sequencing for accuracy and long-read sequencing for spanning complex regions provides a comprehensive approach to sequencing large plasmids.
l Check out this protocol list; it might provide additional insights for resolving the issue.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
I've been trying to perform a Northern blot for a while now, with no positive results.
I use Digoxigenin labeled PCR products as a probe (after boiling for 5min) in hybridization buffer (50%formamide + 5xSSC, 50mM Na-P, 1%SDS, 10ugssDNA/ml, 5xDenharts) @42*C o/n, dollowed by wash, block in 2%milk 0.3% PBS-T, and incubation with an anti-Digoxin antibody.
I know the transfer works, and that RNA is present after prehybridization (via methylene blue), I also know the antibody works due to dot blotting the DIG-labeled probes.
Does methylene blue staining inhibit probe binding?
Every time Ive tried N.blot Ive stained my membrane with methyl blue before in order to see whether the transfer worked. It's all I can think of at this point, otherwise it has to be my probes.
-CP
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, the MeBlue had no real effect. The issue was due to my blocking reagent. I had been using 5% milk (because I'd adapted my Southern Blot protocol). After switching to Maleic Acid Blocking buffer, everything worked.
Maleic Acid Blocking buffer (0.1M Maleic Acid; 0.15M NaCl2) + 10%w/v Roche Blocking reagent (10X)- Maleic Acid made first, filtered. 10% w/v Blocking reagent added and mixed via microwave, then autoclaved. This is 10X so dilute 1:10 for blocking steps.
I've attached my protocol in case anyone needs it.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
I am analyzing samples transfected by CRISPR using the T7 assay. And when I am trying to analyze it on the gel, I can found smears on my samples. I don't know if I added too much enzyme or very long incubation time. Any suggestions?
Here is my recipe/protocol used.
purified PCR product -150ng
NEB buffer 2- 1uL
Water- 9.5uL
Reaction 95C-10min, 85C- 5min (0.1C/sec), 65C-2min (0.1C/sec), 45C-2min (0.1C/sec), 25C-hold
Add 0.5uL T7 enzyme. Incubate for 1hr. Stop reaction by adding 1.5uL 0.25M EDTA. Run on gel.
thank you.
Reaction: 
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello,
Achieving clean and distinct bands in a gel after a T7 Endonuclease I assay, which is commonly used for detecting CRISPR-Cas9 induced mutations, requires careful attention to various steps in the procedure. Smearing can often be a challenge, but here are some effective strategies to minimize it:
  1. Optimal Digestion Conditions: Ensure that the T7 Endonuclease I digestion is performed under optimal conditions. This includes the correct buffer, enzyme concentration, and incubation time and temperature. Over-digestion can lead to smearing, so it's crucial to find the right balance.
  2. Quality of DNA: Use high-quality, purified DNA for the assay. Impurities in DNA samples can inhibit enzyme activity or interfere with electrophoresis, leading to smears.
  3. Gel Concentration: Choose the appropriate agarose gel concentration. A higher percentage gel can resolve smaller fragments more effectively, which might be beneficial depending on the expected size of the digested products.
  4. Loading Buffer: Use an appropriate loading buffer and ensure that it is mixed thoroughly with your samples. This helps the DNA to enter and migrate through the gel evenly.
  5. Electrophoresis Conditions: Run the gel at a consistent and appropriate voltage. Higher voltages can cause the gel to heat up and lead to smearing. A slower run at a lower voltage often yields better resolution.
  6. Sample Volume: Avoid loading too much sample into the wells, as overloading can cause smearing. If necessary, load multiple wells with smaller volumes.
  7. Gel Loading Technique: Be careful while loading the samples into the wells. Pipetting gently and accurately is key to preventing smearing.
  8. Avoiding Contamination: Ensure that all pipettes, tubes, and tips are clean to avoid cross-contamination between samples.
  9. DNA Fragment Size: Be mindful of the expected size of the cleaved DNA fragments. If the fragments are very small, they might appear as a smear. Adjusting the gel concentration or running time can help resolve this issue.
  10. Post-Electrophoresis Handling: Handle the gel carefully after electrophoresis. Excessive handling or harsh staining/destaining procedures can cause smearing.
  11. Positive Controls: Include a positive control known to yield clear bands in the assay. This will help you determine if the smearing is a sample-specific issue or a more general problem with the assay conditions.
  12. Troubleshooting: If smearing persists, consider troubleshooting by varying one condition at a time, such as enzyme concentration, digestion time, or gel percentage.
By following these guidelines, you can minimize smearing in your gels after a T7 Endonuclease I assay, leading to clearer and more interpretable results. Remember, meticulous technique and optimization are often key to successful gel electrophoresis.
This protocol list might provide further insights to address this issue.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
2 answers
Is there any affinity of microRNA to glass surfaces? I tried to homogenize brain samples in order to get maximum yield of microRNA.
Relevant answer
Answer
the glass surface is likely to adsorb DNA/RNA, it's better to use some other beads such as ceramic or metal https://lab.plygenind.com/mastering-bead-selection-for-effective-homogenization
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hi I am looking for any alternative protocols to purify TMV virions, other than the commonly used PEG precipitation. 
Two main problems that I have with PEG protocol is that,
1\ any macromolecule will co-precipitate as well
2\ so that PEG cannot purify full length (300nm) TMV virions from other shorter rods (probably breakage), and other small discs. (thanks to people responded to my earlier question)
So I am wondering if there is any purification protocol or method that can get mostly the full length rods and rid breakage ones and discs? 
Thanks a lot in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
Ammonium Sulphate precipitation works and may help resolve the particles by size. Note that the salt itself may affect the stability of the particles. In my hands, a 45% cut contained TMV CP monomer and multimers up to ~300k( analysed with boiled, reduced SDS-PAGE). I have read elsewhere that a 15% saturation is enough to precipitate rods.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
I am trying to isolate a nuclear protein NF-kB from raw cells in order to do a western blot.
I have searched some protocol for nuclear isolation and finally came up with one. But in that protocol, apart from adding 420mM Nacl for NE buffer , they have added an extra 400mM using 5M NaCl directly onto nuclear pellet and again 1 pellet volume of NE buffer. Can anyone tell why extra NaCl should be added, and if we add double the volume of NE buffer, won't the protein get diluted? I'm attaching that protocol along with this.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Sabina. According to the 1983 paper that described the preparation of NE from Hela cell, transcription looks good in 0.42 M NaCl. So the high salt buffer condition, 420 mM is adopted in most cases. Here is the paper Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
2 answers
i am new to enzymology and want to study the discipline through history based books (i,e, how was the Kreb's cycle discovered, methods used then, etc). what are your suggestions to achieve this?
better to be from wiley or springer.
Relevant answer
Answer
Arthur Kornberg, For the Love of Enzymes: The Odyssey of a Biochemist, is mainly focused on the discovery of enzymes involved in nucleic acid acid replication.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hello, I have developed a Surface Plasmon resonance sensor using LED of wavelength 635nm and CMOS webcam as source. I am using the diverging rays of the LED as the change in incident angle. When I put silver coated glass slide on the prism I get a dip at a particular angle. I have test the sensor by immobilizing with MUA , EDC/NHS and IgG. The sensor can detect the shift in angle for all the layers. But when I put liquid dielectric medium like DI water, BSA or PBS buffer the shift disappears. I can monitor real-time data with the webcam and so when the liquid sample is passed I should be able to detect the shift. I have attached the file of how the dip looks like.
Relevant answer
Answer
Did you find the solution? I am in the same trouble.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
20 answers
I am having a rather odd issue with a ligation procedure. After a (hopefully) successful ligation of a 1kb insert into a 6kb vector, I transformed some Top 10 cells and got (very few) colonies on LB+Amp plates, but always more than the no-ligation control plates (indicating a hopefully successful ligation). I screened several (5-10) of these colonies and isolated DNA using a mini prep, after which I linearized all the DNA and ran on a gel. At first, I got really fuzzy bands, both in the samples and in the ladder, so it was hard to distinguish if they had any insert in them. Also, the unligated vector ran at a different size than expected, and some of the samples had two bands in them or ran faster than the unlighted vector. Overall, it seemed like a very messy gel, so I re-optimized my gel conditions to make sure I could at make any conclusions from the DNA sizes (made new buffer, made sure the loading was done correctly, lowered the voltage to use 90V for 2 hours using a 0.7% gel). After this, my ladder looked crisp and properly separated, and my unligated vector (linearized) ran at the right length and also looked pretty clear. However, all my ligated samples had absolutely no product in them at all! For the first gel, I used 500 ng per well, and all the wells looked equally bright and with similar amounts of DNA. Noticing this was a lot of DNA to run, I reduced it to 125ng of DNA, which showed up perfectly fine for the vector but not for the samples. There is no smear so I don't think it's degradation or nuclease contamination, so I am not sure what to do next. Any ideas? Thanks! I am attaching an image of the gel, with the only visible band being the linearized unligated vector (6kb), and all other wells being my ligation products. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Relevant answer
Answer
I also had this problem. Before you run the gel, purify the ligation product to remove the buffer and the T4 ligase, then you will see the band.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
I expect a 70 bp amplicon which shows up only with 2% (or higher) DMSO in the PCR. But with DMSO, the size of this amplicon goes from 70 bp to ~110b bp on 3% agarose gel. Same happens when a positive control PCR is done using same primers. In the positive control too, the size goes from 70 bp to ~110 bp when done with 2%DMSO. Is this size shift common if DMSO is added in to PCR?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
I'm bringing up this post!
Sanjay Premi your sequencing results gave me some hope ... Let me explain, I try to amplify yan ITS target on grapevine DNA, expected amplicon size : variable around 200 and some.
Here is what I get
Without DMSO: non reproducible results between samples or between pcr on the same sample. In general: very weak amplification (bands not visible or very weak), one or more bands, very variable band sizes, some are > 500 bp.
With DMSO: VERY reproducible results between samples and PCR, ALWAYS only one very visible band slightly < 500 bp.
I have not done any sequencing for the moment.
Sanjay Premi if you still have pictures of your gels with and without DMSO, are you ok to share them with me? or do you simply know more about the origin of this?
Kind regards
Paola
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
Hi
I would like to ask about protein precipitation by salting out method.
I'm going to precipitate collagen from fish scales. Some articles said the supernatant of the extract salted out by adding NaCl to a certain concentration, for example 2.0 M. Does it mean adding solid NaCl or NaCl solution? And how to calculate it?
Can you explain it more detail?
I've read ebook from Coligan (2001), Current Protocols in Protein Science. The book explain about salting out method and the calculation. Can I use that equation to calculate the mass of NaCl?
(The equation on the attached file)
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
May i know how much nacl needed to precipitate the collagen solution?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
I  have a stack of 96 well plates containing lysates in RLT Plus. I dont want to process them all at once, rather a few wells per plate to start. Will re-freezing the rest of the plate damage the samples?
Relevant answer
Answer
Ferhat Ozturk, did you really mean RNase? As far as I know, RNase digests RNA and we try to avoid it as hell during the RNA isolation :)
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
9 answers
Does anybody have a lot of experience with Image Studio Lite by LI-COR and quantitative Western blotting?
Relevant answer
Answer
Can anyone share the image studio lite dmg file? I really appreciate it.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
I am using Griess lysis buffer for cell lysis which contains DTPA & EDTA. Will that interfere with CuCl2 when detecting RSNOs in the cells? How to overcome this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Shruti Dumbre hey Shruti, do you have any update regarding this issue?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
Hallo everyone,
I've been having some trouble isolating bacterial RNA from a gram positive organism for a RNA Seq analysis. My problem is that I always get a very intense "cloud band" on the agarose gel around the position where the 5S RNA band should be.. I've tried several protocols and kits, with and without bead beating, Trizol, Lysozyme, but it happens every time.. The first idea was that these are products of degradation, but then again the intensity of the 23S and the 16S bands clearly remains very high. And also, on a Bioanalyzer this 5S band definitely does not look like degradation, but rather as a sharp peak around 127 nt.. Does anyone have any experience with that? If this is in fact the 5S rRNA, why do I get such accumulation, how should I get rid of it and would it temper with my RNA Seq results?
Thank you all in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Antony, which protocols have you used? In all of them you get the same result shown in the photo?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
1 answer
Antibody for NOX4
Relevant answer
Answer
Maybe you can try the NOX4 Antibody from CUSABIO. It had been used to test the HEK-293 cells, HeLa cells, mouse kidney tissue through WB, and get positive results.
For more details, please visit:
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
The purpose of denaturation is the break down of dsDNA, so what is the need of intial denaturation while denaturation can do the same.
Relevant answer
Answer
Use of the initial denaturation conditions for all cycles can result in deactivation of the polymerase (depends on type) which is why there is a separate initial denaturation stage for standard PCR conditions. The initial denaturation is sometimes carried out at a higher temperature and for longer than the melting carried out during subsequent cycles. This is because some templates can have a high GC content or secondary structures (like hairpin loops) which inhibit the PCR reaction. By having a hotter/longer initial denaturation it is possible to separate the DNA strands enabling the first round of PCR to take place generating shorter/less complicated products that can then be melted under milder denaturation conditions.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
7 answers
We would like to dephosphorylate purified proteins (in vitro). How do we decide what type of alkaline phosphatase to purchase?
Relevant answer
Answer
Maybe this Recombinant Human Alkaline phosphatase, placental-like (ALPPL2) works for this situation. You can view the details on this page:
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
I'm in the initial stages of planning a miRNA seq experiment using human cultured cells and decided on TRIzol extraction, Truseq small RNA prep kit, using an illumina HiSeq2500. The illumina webinar suggests 10-20 Million reads for discovery, the QandA support page suggests 2-5M, and I wrote the tech support to ask, who suggested I do up to 100M reads for rare transcripts. Exiqon guide to miRNA discovery manual says there is not really any benefit on going over 5M reads. I was hoping to save money by pooling more samples in a lane, so I was hoping someone with experience might be able to suggest a suitable number of reads.
Relevant answer
Answer
i am working on cardiomyopathy patients Blood samples . and wanted to do miRNA sequencing can some one please suggest how many millions reads i need to sequence 20 millions or 30 millions and also please suggest the platform as well .
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
i got mann whitney test value U=1402, i am confused about this so large value. this value is right? i mean if value comes in thousands then no need to worry or there is any problem??? please
Relevant answer
Answer
I want to know the answer too because I got a mann-Whitney of 1754
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
2 answers
I'm going to view localization of certain fluorescent protein in Enterococuccus. As they tend to form chains, and for analysis I need to use single cells images, I wonder if I can fix in first with PFA and then proceed with microscopy? Are they still considered alive?
Another question is if I want to track the appearance of my protein on the cell surface during the cell growth, may I use agarose pad, or it wouldn't divide on it? Can I use BHI agar instead or it will interfere with imaging due to less-transperent properties?
That's where fixing becomes a problem, once fixed will I be able to track division or not?
Relevant answer
Answer
I thought PFA killed everything dead, too, but CD4+ T cells, fixed with PFA, can still activate resting B cells.
Source:
Yellin, M. J., Sippel, K., G Inghirami, Covey, L. R., Lee, J. J., Sinning, J., Clark, E. A., Chess, L., & Lederman, S. (1994). CD40 molecules induce down-modulation and endocytosis of T cell surface T cell-B cell activating molecule/CD40-L. Potential role in regulating helper effector function. The Journal of Immunology152(2), 598–608. https://www.jimmunol.org/content/152/2/598.long
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
1 answer
Does anyone know how to make the fluid to remove the coverslip of glass bottom dishes?
Relevant answer
Answer
Assalamulaikum Ayni Sharif
I am trying to remove the coverslip from the dish. Could you share your experience?
Thanks
Mohammad
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
10 answers
Hello everyone!
I am using AB Stepone system with Qiagen QuantiNova PCR kit. After doing my first trial, my qPCR results were very strange, the plot are "hook"-shaped (attachment). Anyone know what happen? The machine I use is not calibrated (the last calibration was around 2012~2013), will that cause any problem like this?
Our plate centrifuge are out of order and I cannot centrifuge properly, but no visible droplets remains on the wall. There are still some bubbles on the top liquid surface, is it a possible cause for my results (I thought the bubbles will be removed upon heating)?
I am doing a quantification experiment with 5 standards (300,000 copies, 1:10 diluted to 30 copies). I am new to qPCR and really confused by the result, please help :(
Thank you for your help!!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi there! I don't know if you solved this already, but just in case I write. I had recently this problem and came to this post to try to find a solution, I found it elsewhere in the end, so I am writing for all the future newcomers as well. The problem with this is that the machine is reading the ROX value on your endogenous control. If you didn't add ROX to your samples (like me), this makes the machine subtract the values of your endogenous to all the samples, resulting in no amplification. Go to "set up" and, on the "assign targets to wells" tag, select the endogenous and select "none" in the reference. Then go to "analysis" and click on the "analyze" button. Magically, all your amplification curves will suddenly appear!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
1 answer
Hello everyone!
My protein which has a GFP tag is well expressed in nuclei. To visualize cell boundaries in different layers of the root sample, I am planning to counter stain my samples with propidium iodide and DAPI.
I will be taking images using 3i spinning disc confocal microscope.
I want to know if anyone has a working protocol for such settings.
Earlier, I tried Hoechst 33342 to stain nuclei but it appears that even incubating for 30 minutes, the stain was not able go inside the cells as the cell boundaries were clearly visible during microscopy. I tried DAPI as well, but the background was very high even after 3-4 washes and the intensity of nuclei was not great.
I will appreciate if you could share with me your experiences and suggestions regarding my question.
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, are you planning to use the propidium iodide for both cell boundaries and nuclei?
If your GFP tag is well expressed in the nuclei, you do not need to stain it again. But if the fluorescence signal is not as bright as you want it to be, open the pinhole for more light to reach your sample.
I have used propidium to stain the cell boundary of Arabidopsis roots in the past, and it worked brilliantly. I stained the root for just 5 minutes using the recommended concentration on the bottle.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
9 answers
Does anybody have experience with ACC (Acetyl Coenzyme A Carboxylase) and pACC detection by western blotting?  It is often used to confirm the status of AMPK activity. The antibodies we use are from Cell Signaling Tech. and they are cited in several publications. However, our anti-ACC does not work at all, while anti-pACC recognizes an unspecific sharp band at 100 kDa and a signal, which  is running around the expected MW 265 kDa,  not as a defined band, but as a “diffused zone”. It should be pACC, because its intensity mirrors that of pAMPK. I am not sure, if it is a problem related to our SDS-PAGE 6% gels or blotting or lysate preparation (RIPA buffer + protease and phosphatase inhibitors, then treated 5 min at 95 °C in highly reducing  conditions (beta-mercaptoethanol, 5% in lysates). We are trying to detect ACC in HepG2 cells and rat liver lysates. This is really frustrating, because according to several publications pACC and ACC should be sharp bands. Please help us to identify the critical problem and get nice pACC/ACC blots.
Relevant answer
Answer
You used 10% gel and you say you had good results letting the dye get to the bottom of the gel.
How many amps did you use for gel run and membrane transfer?
How much time did you spend on these two steps?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
I infected the cell lines H1437, H2073 and H2228 with a lentivirus that express resistance to puromycin. Does anyone knows the best dosis and time for selection? I have found information using 2 micrograms per ml for 3 days, but when I did the kill curve for H2228 it did not seem to be enough.
Any information or experiences would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Perfect! I am following up the kill curve that I made just in case and those are great suggestions!
Thank you,
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
14 answers
For examination in a laboratory.
Relevant answer
Answer
The most accurate and reliable method for seeing viable Cells is Colony Forming Units (CFU) /ml. Make serial dilution of the desired sample and you can go for pour plating by adding 10-100ul serially diluted sample to petriplate. Incubate for 24 hours and count next day the colonies formed on PDA
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
I want to make point mutations/corrections in iPSCs.
Which iPSC vectors would have a high efficiency?
Puromycin selection may be better than GFP/FACS sorting?
Relevant answer
Answer
I do not know how old this discussion is…but…
Actually, doing with RNPs (ribonucleoprotein complexes) of sgRNA and spCa9 protein together with a HDR template using oligos you would get a higher indel efficiency!
It also avoids DNA damage caused by antibiotics usually applied for selection.
So I would give preference to RNPs
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
8 answers
I'm at the moment trying to overexpress a protein known as amidohydrolase from Rhodococcus into e.coli BL21/DE3 using pET28a vector. To confirm the expression, I did western blot with a Anti-6X His tag antibody (given that there is no antibody specifically for amidohydrolase). Surprisingly, my negative control, which is the cells transformed with pET28a without my insert, gives me strong signal at 40KDa. Has anybody encountered a similar situation? Does anyone have an explanation for this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Empty pET28 expresses a 58 aa protein.
Here is the sequence:
MetGlySerSerHisHisHisHisHisHisSerSerGlyLeuValProArgGlySerHisMetAlaSerMetThrGlyGlyGlnGlnMetGlyArgGlySerGluPheGluLeuArgArgGlnAlaCysGlyArgThrArgAlaProProProProProLeuArgSerGlyCysEnd
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
1 answer
I had made a cDNA library with infusion smarter cDNA library kit using Stellar Electrocompetent cells, 7 months back. Now when I grow white colonies in LB -Amp they are slow growing and don't achieve requisite culture growth. Also from them I get no plasmid when I proceed.
Relevant answer
Answer
It seems that stellar cell is not compatible to grow in LB broth. I spread recovery medium SOC containing stellar cells after transformation on LB+ carberniciline. They can grow on this plate. However, after 4 months in the fridge, I cannot grow them on LB.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
1 answer
We are using mouse muscle DNA but ideal sonication condition is elusive. I wonder if anyone used Misonix S 4000 to fragment DNA into 500-1000 bp for CHIP?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Zhegnxing, I'm wondering did you figure out the best setting using S-4000 to shear genomic DNA? I'm doing a similar experiment and looking for a relevant protocol.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
11 answers
Do I need to use DNA ladder or it is not important? what is the programme used for analysisi? and also if I have many samples could I make two electrophoresis gels or they must be in one gel?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr@aya Gaber..this program offer free trial for one month and there are many videos in their website showing step by step how to analyse gel electrophoresis results
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
Hi everyone,
I am trying to improve sustainability in my institute and I realized that there is an overuse of MilliQ water. I believe that for most of the operations done in a microbiology lab (buffers and bacterial media preparation, PCRs, restriction reactions, ligations, DNA assemblies, ...), using distilled water might be sufficient. I was wondering if someone has an overview of which water can be used for which protocol and maybe a list of the operations which really require MilliQ water.
Thank you very much in advance for your help!
Best,
Filippo
Relevant answer
Answer
For molecular reactions (PCR, restriction digests, etc.) it is best to use molecular grade water - purchased in a bottle & not out of a filtration set up.
For buffers & media, regular ddH2O from your filtration system is preferred, but dH2O is good enough.
For washing dishes, use tap water & rinse in dH2O.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
I am having issues with unexpected flourescent bands occurring in my negative control samples (heat inactivated / minus telomerase samples) whilst using the TRAP assay to look for telomerase activity. I have ruled out contamination,  run a temperature gradient for annealing temperatures and varied cycle numbers but this had no effect. I have contacted the assay's producers but they gave no useful suggestions. Has anyone else had the same problem?!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, I am having this problem - did you ever figure out how to resolve it? Maybe telomere fragments in the sample?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
2 answers
Can anyone share a protocol for a ferrozine assay for tissue samples that is reproducible, including the lysis protocol? Also, what is the minimal amount of iron detectable using this protocol and which method was used to quantify the tissue amount (by protein?)?
Relevant answer
Answer
Respected sir,
i want to estimate non heme iron in Fe+2 state, in a protein. Please tell what method i can use? It is very urgent
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
11 answers
Hi,
For the FreeStyle HEK 293F cell serum-free suspension culture, is it possible to use another media (a cheaper one) than the FreeStyle 293 Expression Medium? 
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Alisa,
I cultured 293F cells in the Cytiva SFM4Transfx-293 and finally used FectoPro from Polyplus for transfection on a regular basis.
Small tip:
- Use 0.8 ug DNA + 0.8 ul Fectopro per ml
- Seed cells at 1.7E/ml 7-8 hours before transfection in fresh medium
Best
Andreas
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
I have been working on a TBI mouse model and looking at AQP4. The literature provided by abcam shows the western blot data to have a band at 46 kDa and another one at 20kDa that they cannot identify. My blots have a double band at 48 and 46 kDa and a large band at 20 kDa. Does anyone have any experience working with this antibody? Any suggestions or ideas about what these bands represent?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have been looking into this, as well. I have seen bands at ~90kDa, at ~50kDa, and at ~20kDa. Primary literature points to the ~90kDa band as likely some SDS-insoluble oligomer. But, I can't seem to find anything for the 20kDa band. Have you found anything yet?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
Hello. I am currently developing a protocol for a neutrophil phagocytosis assay using flow cytometry. We will use a GFP-expressing bacteria. Can anyone tell me if the addition of trypan blue will quench the GFP-signal of the non-internalized bacteria? I know trypan blue is used to quench the signal of fluorescently labeled extra-cellular antibodies, but I wasn't sure if it would work if the fluorescent signal was coming from protein inside the bacteria?
Relevant answer
Answer
Did you try to just quench fluorescence of GFP-bacteria (by themselves, no need for neutrophils) with trypan blue?
I would like to try phagocytosis with GFP-yeast, and quenching free yeast.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
12 answers
I am using Dot Blot study to detect 5hmC level. Dot blot detection is ok but when I use methylene blue stain to check the control, the dots are not so clear. Very faint color I can see on the membrane. Two methylene blue staining methods I used but result is same.
Method-1: Membrane is washed with miliQ water and then treated with 0.04% methylene blue in 0.5M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) for over night.
Method-2: Membrane is washed with miliQ water and then treated with 5% acetic acid solution for 15 min at room temperature. After that treatment with 0.04% methylene blue in 0.5M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) for over night.
Is there anybody who can give some valuable suggestions that could help me to solve this problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
I am putting up a protocol here in case someone is still looking for it. This works quite well with us.
1. Make 0.02% (w/v) methylene blue in 0.3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5).
2. Stain for 3-5 minutes
3. Destain with water.
4. Change the water several times.
Note: In case you doing this protocol post hybridization wash membrane with 100 % ethanol for 2-3 minutes followed by water and then stain it.
best wishes
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
Our group is looking at moving away from traditional western blot methods as there are many more time efficient options now available. I have seen an impressive demonstration of using a few ml of "1-Step™ NBT/BCIP Substrate Solution" to detect protein bands on the membrane. However, I have heard that this technique is limited in that it does not allow for stripping and re-probing with different antibodies. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how this can be overcome? Or are there any other limitations that I should be aware of?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Vivek Bhakta Mathema From my experience, it could be a blocking problem when your background appears quicker than your protein band of interest. Try using a fresh blocking buffer. What blocking buffer did you use?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
After rounds of washing and antibody staining, the protein ladder seems to fade. Does anyone know why?
Relevant answer
Answer
This may be an old question but I may have the answer.
There was a time when I first joined a new lab, I adapted to the WB protocol then. Turned out washing with highspeed (say, 110rpm) actually washed away much of my protein ladder. So I moved back to my old washing speed (70rpm) and the ladders were saved, happily ever after
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
Hello, I am running an Optiprep iodixanol gradient density to isolate my exosomes. With each run I also have a control which I exact 12 fractions and from the protocol it said I need to calculate the density of each fraction so I will know in which might be my exosomes. 
However, although it might be quite straight forward, I am having difficulties in calculating the density of each fraction. I have been given the coefficient of extinction 320 L g-1 cm-1 and the wavelength 244nm. And with that I dilute each franction to 1:10000 and read the absorbency. However, I do not know how to get to the density from there. Any suggestion?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
@julien siracusa
I have the very same problem. But I have twice higher OD than recommended in all 5,10,20 and 40% fractions. I thought its handling error. So I have repeated again very carefully, no Pipestone error no calculation errors. Yet it's same. If someone knows about this kindly help me to figure out.
Thanks in advance
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
7 answers
I was reading SDS PAGE and methodology it was mentioned, I searched it online but i couldn't find the answer.
Relevant answer
Answer
The ability of Coomassie R-250 dye to bond to proteins is most effective at low pH contributed by acetic acid. Methanol is a fixative which sort of dehydrates the gel. Methanol isn't a requirement. The same concentration of ethanol works just as well and it is safer.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
I ran samples (looking for c.bovis in swabs and tumors) using the same primes/probes, Taqman Master Mix, DEPC H2O that was used last week on samples that worked fine. These new samples that should had been negative tested positive for c. bovis. I replaced all reagents and reran the samples. Still positive. Some samples are negative and the NTC is negative so I do not thing contamination is the cause. I can not think of any other cause for the false positives. Can anyone offer any assistance? Thank You.
I have also included an image of the results for better visual. 
Relevant answer
Answer
@Maria, have you solved the problem with false positives? I have been getting similar false positives only in Hex probe tagged gene in a cheaper enzyme only at Ct between 29 and 34 which is typical for all the false positive cases. In other standard enzymes it does not occur though the primer mix used is the same. This is a multiplex reaction and the other probes are FAM and Rox which are working good. The shapes of the curves for false positive are mostly sigmoidal and some are non-sigmoidal. Please help.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hi, 
I'm trying to disrupt some genes of the genome of E. coli. For achieving this, I'm following the protocol of the P1 phage in which this phage transfers genetic material from one strain to another. The recipient strain is from the keio collection, so I don't have any problem with the selection of the colonies which were succesfully trasduced.
But after the confirmation of the disruption with the antibiotic screening and PCR, I tried to remove the Kn resistance using flippase. The flippase is a recombinase that recognize FRT (Flippase recognition target) sites and removes all the flanked area.
This plasmid must be electroporated and then grow it at 30°C, because it has a temperature sensitive ori.
I have done all of this but I have not obtained any transformant. Do you have any clue of why I don't get colonies? Can you give me some tips?
Relevant answer
Answer
Mercedes Vazquez Can I as you what plasmid you are talking about? Is it pCP20?
Many thanks?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hello
Today i want to ask about whether there is optimal condition of centrifugation
(speed, time, and temperature) to obtain cell pellet.
I have already searched many protocols, but i only can find those mentioning about bacterial culture.
What i want to ask is about the optimal condition of centrifugation to get pellet of HUVECs. For me, i collect HUVECs to 1.5ml tubes with 1X PBS and I spin down the samples with small centrifuge for about just 30 seconds.
Then i can see the pellet at the bottom.
But i learned that there are numerous conditions of pelleting down cells
so i want to ask whether my protocol described above is ok
Thank you very much!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello
Using 400g for 5 minutes in tubes of 15 and 50mL I have been able to form pellets of cell lines and tissue cells in suspension without problems. To pellet 96 well plates, I have used 900g for 2 minutes.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
7 answers
When determining titer of T7 phage by plaque assay, I get a gradient of plaques where one side of the plate is clearing and the other half of the plate is a lawn of bacteria.  Anyone experience this issue?
Relevant answer
Answer
AS YOU KNOW WELL THE T PHAJES ARE OF TWO TYPES
the ODD. T1, T3, T5 T7, and
THE EVEN ARE T2.T4, T6,
As I KNOW LOT OF WORK AND LITERATURE EXITS BECAUSE THE PLAQUE SIZE ID GOOD ENOUGH TO OBSERVE AND EASY TO WORK AND DETECT MUTATIONS
AND VARIOUS KINDS OF EXPERIMENTs have been done
With odd phages the plaque size is too small and little work has been done
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
there are many methods to mtDNA extraction from human blood , what about the positive control used as marker in gel electrophoresis
Relevant answer
Answer
How mtDNaA is extracted from genomic DNA for next generation mtgenomics?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
Every time I try to isolate DNA, it ends with a smear like band on gel, or the pellet obtained is very little. Currently I am using a protocol which requires 2 days to isolate DNA.  If possible please suggest a protocol that enables isolation within the same day.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for nice queries. Total genomic DNA (gDNA) from milk could be extracted using different protocols including automated platform like Maxwell 16 (Promega). See the the latest protocols in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.09.039.
Howver, for RNA extraction, milk should be collected aseptically, and transported to the Laboratory keeping in a RNA later solution. The extraction of RNA from milk somatic cells or else using different cutting-edge protocols. See the protocols in the following manuscript: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11184; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0955-8.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
Which is the best method and software for Microsatellite markers analysis?
Relevant answer
Answer
NTysys is fine i think
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
7 answers
Urgent for help!!!!!
I want to elute proteins fron Aminophenyl-m7GTP (C10-spacer)-Agarose(Jena Bioscience).
I searched some articles and some answers on Research Gate, there are many different ways. I want to elute it with sample loading buffer,and then running SDS-PAGE gel. 
I want to know how can I wash unbinding protein away from the Agarose? Do I need to check the concentration again after I add same volume of loading buffer to the Agarose? 
Can some tell me detailed procedure to do this?
Thanks advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
I know I'm "bumping" a now ancient thread, but I recently used these beads (Jena, AC-155S) to successfully test binding of a plant 4EHP-homolog to m7GTP. Elution was performed by resuspending the beads in 1x Laemmli sample buffer and boiling at 95C for 5 min. A few observations that may be helpful for people considering using these beads:
  • After samples cool, the agarose will congeal as a mass at the bottom of the tube.
  • Using a 4:1 elution buffer to bead ratio seems to result in only half the initial volume of elution buffer as pipettable; the other half gets incorporated into the congealed agarose. 7:1 elution buffer to bead ratio seems to work well.
  • I wonder if elution issues observed by others is due to proteins getting trapped in congealed agarose?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hello everyone,
I am trying to clone 4 inserts (816 bp, 864 bp, 1226 bp and 1699 bp) into Xho I digested pBSK (+) vector (2598 bp) using NEB's Gibson assembly kit. All the fragments used are gel purified and have a good yield. I have set up reactions by taking 0.025 pmoles of vector and 0.05 pmoles of each of the inserts, with a total reaction volume of 15ul. The reaction is incubated as per the manufacturer's instructions. I have been checking my assembly on the gel before I transform it into XL-1 Blue competent cells and I observe a faint band of expected size (7.2 kb). However, I am unable to get any recombinants post-transformation and end up with only self-ligated vector. The vector has been XhoI digested, gel extracted and treated with antartic phosphatase to prevent self-ligation. Can someone suggest tips to drive the reaction so as to achieve more efficient assembly of the fragments?
Thanks a lot!
Kajal
Relevant answer
Answer
follow these points and you will most likely get cloned vector:
1) Keep the molar ratio of vector to insert as 1:3. Your insert DNA should be 3X fold and not less than 3X.
2) Insert should have complementary bases (on 3' and 5' ends) to your BB of at least 20-25bp.
3) Strictly try to use the vector BB as a PCR amplified product and not as restriction enzyme digested product. Most of the time, there is little amount of undigested vectors in digestion reaction and this causes the false colony appearance on ampicillin plates.
Hope this helps.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
From the standard text, I found that ethidium bromide intercalates the double stranded DNA, then how single stranded DNA can be visualized by ethidium bromide? I am curious about different visualization methods and mechanism?
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with Mohsen Ashrafi . In addition , Ethidium Bromide is carcinogenic dye and there are another dye more safety like SYBER GREEN.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
1 answer
If I vortex stock primer for PCR strongly, will it break easily?
Relevant answer
Answer
Don't vortex too much. But you can vortex gently for 5-10 for proper mixing. It would not break primers.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
7 answers
I'm trying to find the best way to measure acetylcholine (ACh) levels in brain areas of interest. I've used some commercially available kits but the results are not great (maybe problems with detection of ACh).
Relevant answer
Answer
I tried the kit few times and it gives higher values for Free choline than Total choline hence negative values for acetylcholine. Even if all acetylcholine is converted to choline during brain tissue processing, free choline should never exceed total choline. Is it possible that choline acetyltransferase is rapidly converting choline to acetylcholine?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
10 answers
I need to know if you can induce gene expression by injecting it into the mouse. There are plenty of examples of using the system in cell culture but I wasn't able to find anything about using it in animals. Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
At least in zebrafish embryo, cumate is too toxic to be used. Even 1xconcentration of cumate (from SBI) drove all embryonic death within few hours. So, I do not recommend cumate applying to in vivo experiments. Eric R Hugo
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
10 answers
Hii
I need help. I need to send some RNA samples to my service provider in US. I am planning to send my samples in Ethanol and Sodium acetate precipitate form. But my issue is I dont have an option to send in DRY ice or cold condition. Can anyone tell me will my RNA in ethanol and sodium acetate be stable at room temperature? 
I know, until there is no RNase in my samples, nothing can happen. As we all tried till now is keeping in -80C until use, But still anyone tried to keep the RNA in ethanol and sodium acetate at room temperature for more than 24hr? I know i may be asking a  stupid question, but accidents can happen always in someones life. Like, forgetting to keep the samples in -80C, something like that happened to anyone?
I need answers from experienced hands so that with confidence i can send my samples in room temperature in ethanol and sodium acetate. 
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Imene,
Happy to help you. I isolated total RNA through the traditional method (refer to my publication for protocol) and checked the quality. Samples were shipped in normal Ice by adding 2.5 volumes of absolute ethanol. One of my friends carried it in luggage while flying and RNA was stable. The samples had around 7 RIN values after reprecipitating and got good RNA seq results. For the safer side, you can follow the kit method (Qiagen or Sigma) so that it will be more stable and can avoid RNase contamination by handing the traditional method. Keep in mind, if you handle the samples properly and perform a good RNA preparation, they will be stable. Even you can isolate and try to keep it in ice for 1 or 2 days and have a check before sending it. I don't know anything about your samples (plant or animal) also how the properties of the tissue. If you can share the information, I will be happy to help you more.
Good Luck!
Best,
Sajeevan
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
I have been trying to arrest immortalized MEFs using double thymidine chase, I have used two different protocols, in one I added 2mM thymidine for 15 hours released 10 hours and back to thymidine for 17 hours, but when I took the cells to flow cytometry I cannot see a nice peak at the beginning of S phase instead I saw an increase of cells on S phase indeed but I still can see a G1 peak and some cells on G2/M, has anyone arrested these cells or has any suggestion? Thanks,
Relevant answer
Answer
I have not tried Thymidine block yet and I am not getting nice results with Nocodazole. The method that has given me a reliable result to track S-phase is serum depletion.
12h with depletion media (DMEM+glutamine+0.1%FCS) and then release in DMEM+glutamine+10%FCS.
I hope it helps.
Edd R-C
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
Is there any DAB staining method for ROS detection in pea leaves??
Relevant answer
Answer
We only use in situ detection of H2O2. Histochemical staining is described in:
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
8 answers
The storage buffer of the RiboLock RNase reagent contains 50% (v/v) glycerol that prevents the overdrying of RNA. My question is what if we would use ethanol along with glycerol for DNA drying too.
Тhank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Follow
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
9 answers
I had done PCR in two batches. I had casted a agarose gel using two combs. I had loaded few samples from the first batch (most of them had been already visualized and had given good amplification) and then ladder and the few samples from second batch in the upper well. The remaining samples of second batch were loaded in lower wells of same gel.
After visualizing the gel under UV no bands were seen in the upper wells except the ladder while good amplification was seen in lower wells.
Why it occurred?
Relevant answer
Answer
The same thing I experienced today. I am sure, I have loaded the samples with dye, and at the upper left lane, I used the ladder. So it happened!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Dear all, I am currently using Qiagen miRNA profiler plates (catalogue number: MIBT-659ZF-24) to identify deregulated miRNAs in cattle under certain physiological condition.
I have ordered the product and the product arrived as well, however I did not find any product manual and the plate layout of that particular product in the internet page of the company. If someone used it before can you please provide me the plate layout.
Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Dr. Hasan,
Did you get the plate layout for 384 well formats? I'm looking for miRNA list on the panel, if you have would you please share it.
Thanks,
Ankita
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
Hi, question about cloning. I tried to do a massive cloning experiment, but when I ran PCR to test for positive clones, only a very small percent of the transformations were successful so back to the beginning unfortunately. I was going through troubleshooting issues and realized that "too much ligation reaction" was a reason for low efficiency. I used 5 uL of my reaction rather than the suggested 2uL that my protocol called for, thinking that I wasn't going to use it again so why not? I think this might have been my problem. Can anyone tell me why using too much ligation reaction would be a reason for poor and low cloning efficiency? Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Use 10% vol/vol of ligation mix/DNA solution to chemically transform competent bacterial cells. If your volume is higher, dry at 37 deg C or vacuum-dry to reduce it to 10% volume.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
47 answers
Can anyone please suggest some related topic or area in microbiology and immunology except COVID/SAARS?
Relevant answer
molecular virology
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
TOP10 bacteria supposed to be ccdB sensitive. I transfected them with a gateway plasmid and the selections does not work for me.
can anyone give me some hints? Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Domokos,
I'm having exactly the same issue as you do with TOP10. I transformed them with the pDEST as a control and obtained a lot of colonies on an antibiotic agar plate. Were you able to figure out where the issue came from?
Thanks,
Carole
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
2 answers
Does anybody have experience visualizing intestine whole mounts by confocal microscopy (IF) and could give me some details about the protocol to get clear images of crypts and villi?. In my hands, the tissue is too thick and antibodies cannot penetrate so well, besides the fact that is very difficult to focus on the microscope.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hope you got a good protocol for whole mount staining on mouse intestine? I am more interested toward the isolation of intestinal layer for doing immunostaining on myenteric and submucosal plexus on mouse colon.
Thanks in advance
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
In NHS/EDC protocol, there are two buffers. coupling buffer and activation buffer. (+washing buffer) And, I will conjugate PEG-COOH to amine-modified oligonucleotide.
In the NHS / EDC reaction protocol, the composition of the coupling buffer is shown but the composition of the activation buffer is not shown. In addition, all of these protocols are protocols for the conjugation of amine to -COOH in proteins, and there is no mention of what buffer to use when attaching an amine modified oligonucleotide to -COOH.
1. If the pH is kept between 8.5 and 9.5, does the activation buffer have a similar pH? What is the composition of the activation buffer?
2. In the case of the coupling buffer, the pH of the protein in the protocol is 6.0, which is higher than 7.2. Is it okay to use it as a coupling buffer for oligonucleotides (for immersing PEG particles)?
ps. If you have an EDC / NHS protocol for conjugation of the amino-modified oligonucleotide you have with -COOH (which is better for polyethylene glycol-COOH), I would appreciate it. Other reagents can not afford to buy.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, Kyungsun,
I have the same question now, have you resolved the question about the buffer pH when coupling COOH to a NH2 modified oligonucleotide?
Thanks for reply!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hi!
I'm wondering about how RNA later works when DNA is the end goal. I am planning to culture some bacteria and send the pellet for genomic sequencing, and I was told it's ok to send the pellet in RNAlater instead of freezing it (I don't have access to liquid nitrogen and they would prefer not using glycerol).
I haven't found any clarifications about this, so I wonder will DNA really be preserved well, especially if it turns out the pellets will stand in RNAlater solution at room temperature for at least a few days.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you can extract DNA you can store it at -80 0r even -20 for a few days. Transporting it can be done in dry ice. For short journeys you can even use ice packs. But if you need RNA later which is expensive, I am attaching a link from Github which tells you how to make your own RNA later
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
We know that the amplification efficiency significance in optimization and validation of PCR data. Here I am stuck with above formula how it was derived. Of course, the above formula derivation is not important as most of the PCR are fully automated but I am very much curious to know the mathematical background of PCR. So please can anyone show the path to resolve it?
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree that the authors of https://www.gene-quantification.de/rudledge-2003.pdf – jumped too quick on the basic qPCR equation, but that doesn’t mean (E+1) is out of thin air! The equation has meaning, and indeed has a derivation.
First thing first, let’s be on the same page. We are deriving linear region of semi-log qPCR curve (log[concentration or dilution] vs C values set at the threshold. The no. of copies shall, ideally, increase by a factor of two.
Hence, the basic equation in this region shall be
N_C = N_0 * 2^C (eq 1)
Ok, so far so good, but how this “2” appears in the equation. One can explain via exponential growth curve fit and so on. For simplicity, “2” means N_C has been doubled the number of copies a cycle before i.e. N_C / N_[C-1] = 2, where C-1 is subscript to represent a cycle before.
Lets replace the numerical value of "2" with terms. The eq (1) shall be (which is, actually, the right basic qPCR equation)
N_C = N_0 * (N_C / N_[C-1])^C (eq 2)
Next, let’s define what is efficiancy. In basic terms, it is
E = [(final product conc. or copies) - (initial product conc. or copies)] / (initial product conc. or copies)
Multiply with 100, if one wants percent efficiency.
Thus, efficiency is
E = (N_C - N_[C-1]) / N_[C-1]
Why N_C, not N_0? : because, remember, we are talking about “2” or the doubling in the linear region of curve!
or E = N_C / N_[C-1] - 1 (rearrangement of previous equation)
or (E + 1) = N_C / N_[C-1] (eq 3)
From eq. (2) and (3), you shall get author’s eq (1) i.e.
N_C = N_0 * (E + 1)^C
The rest portion is derived in the paper.
Hope this will help and
All the best!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
4 answers
I am trying to isolate membrane bound protein from a number of different mouse tissues and I wanted to know if high salt (400mM) RIPA buffer would work on fat.
Relevant answer
Answer
RIPA buffer is very inefficient for extract protein from adipose tissue. Following link gives pretty good answers.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
10 answers
the protein will be measure at absorbance of 280 nm and I can know the concentration of it in mg/ml using the extension coefficient but how if this protein is conjugated with HRP, because the HRP will be measure at this absorbance spectrum??
Relevant answer
Answer
It should be OK to quantify the concentration of HRP using the 403 nm absorbance, as long as you are confident that the protein is not aggregated (which would cause an overestimate). You could also quantify it using the standard protein assays such as Bradford and BCA, which would not be affected by aggregation.
If you are interested in using the HRP for its catalytic activity, you should also measure the specific activity of each batch, which also requires an accurate knowledge of the protein concentration.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
9 answers
I am working with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, Small RNA Kit and with the software of Agilent 2100 Expert version B02.08.SI648. I obtained results of my last run. However, I do not how to change the scale of (s) to (nt) in the electropherogram. I tried with several options in the software, but it did not work.
Relevant answer
Answer
On "electropherogram" drop down menu, select "show sizes"
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
We have tried various modifications to our standard Western Blotting procedures now trying to detect CHOP (GADD153) in our human cell lysates after e.g. stimulation with 1 µg/l tunicamycine, but to no avail.
Do you have some helpful pointers as to how to detect CHOP?
We have used nitrocellulose and PVDF membranes in the past. Primary antibody is the recommended Santa Cruz monoclonal mouse anti-GADD153 (B-3) at 1:250. For technical reasons, we don't do the transfer on ice, however, actin signal is always strong on our membranes.
Is it a matter of amount of protein loaded? We have done roughly 20-30 µg/lane so far.
Thanks for any good ideas or working protocols!
Relevant answer
Answer
I stumbled upon this conversation as we were also experiencing difficulties in detecting CHOP protein. For your information, using a fixation step with glutaraldehyde optimized the detection of CHOP on Western Blots.
cf: "Improvement of immunodetection of the transcription factor C/EBP homologous protein by western blot"
  • May 2020Analytical Biochemistry
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113775
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
2 answers
2D Micronic vs. Fluidx Tubes
My main concern is tube quality and evaporation
Relevant answer
what is the cost for Micronic?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hi everyone
I am planning to use the Qiagen RT2 Profiler PCR array for signaling pathways. Is it really necessary to use the RT2 SYBR Green Mastermixes and the RT2 First Strand Kit with the profiler array? Can I use Applied Biosystems SYBR Green PCR mastermix instead (Cat no. 4309155) as well as my already synthesized cDNAs? The platform is Roche Light Cycler 480.
Looking forward for some help. Many thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
u should use rt2 first strand kit, otherwise, the controls will not work. controls are required for data analsis.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
19 answers
it is monoplex not multiplex and not RFLP
Relevant answer
Answer
RABD PCR
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
10 answers
I performed agarose gel (1%) for PCR products of COX-2 from saliva samples of patients suffering from periodontitis. I could not see any bands and therefore in order to check if the RNA was isolated appropriately, I also performed agarose gel electrophoresis and again could not see even a band of RNA. Can anyone suggest where we are making mistake? 
Relevant answer
Answer
Revise the whole experiment from the first like sample collection and the final stage. Depend on other person is not good.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
8 answers
Does anyone have a protocol for isolating exosomes from milk?
Relevant answer
Answer
As you might have noticed, there are many different isolation procedures for extracellular vesicles from milk.
Just some advice from my side:
What species are you working with? Because depending on the species, the contents of milk vary greatly. For instance, cows milk contains far more casein micelles than human milk. So you need to adjust the protocol to the content of the milk.
Ideally, you should obtain fresh milk and remove the milk fat globules (which are relatively unstable vesicular structures). By centrifuging the sample, a layer of fat (these are the MFG) will develop, which you can easily scoop off. Then, you can freeze the milk supernatant, without risking contamination of disrupted MFGs in your sequential isolation.
In general, but also in case of milk: precipitation methods using commercial kits or pelleting of EVs give a lot of impurities (especially caseins in ruminant milk) and does not allow you to isolate pure EVs from milk. Best is to apply either differential centrifugation and density gradient separation and/or size exclusion chromatography. This is a lot of extra work (which, unfortunately is not always performed), but you gain a lot of purity with these approaches.
Kind regards
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
Dear Researcher, As far I know  that Azotobacter species gram negative.Is it possible to have gram positive Azotobacter species by gram staining procedure ?
Relevant answer
Answer
As far I know Azetobactor are gram negative.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
7 answers
I'm trying to get subcellular fractions (specifically, I only need the nuclear fraction) from neuronal tissue.  However, all my current samples were flash frozen and stored in -80C subsequently (for whole cell lysate, which was my original intent for the samples). 
Does subcellular fractionation for nuclear protein require fresh tissues and cells?  Will flash freezing might cause ice crystals to form and pierce the nuclear membrane, so I wouldn't get good separation?
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Late to the party but I have performed sub-cellular fractionation on frozen heart tissue with good results - yet to be published. This paper describes liver tissue frozen and subjected to fractionation also with good results.
Just give it a try, most of the important nuclear proteins complex with a structural binding partner (DNA, Lamins) anyways, so will be probably remain in the nuclear fraction even if the membrane has been a bit pierced with ice crystals. also, careful flash freezing i.e. in isopentane, should limit the number of crystals that form.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
11 answers
I designed four  primer pairs and i want to set up the PCR reaction conditions (Temperatures and numbers of cycles) for these  primer pairs .. is there any recommended software or programme to do this job? 
Thank you..
Relevant answer
Answer
you can use optimase writer protocol to predict PCR program
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
8 answers
The ThermoBrite Elite system automates the pre- and post-hybridization steps in FISH testing.
How efficient is it? Is it a closed system? Is it FDA approved?
Relevant answer
Answer
Alguien ha probado el Xmatrx® NANO de Biogenex?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
Is there any better option than these cell lines to study oligodendrocytes in vitro?
I need to create hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic condition. Then I aim to inhibit perticular protein by adding inhibitor to the culture to understand effect of that protein on oligodendrocyte survival.
Relevant answer
Answer
I'm also looking for an oligodendrocyte cell line and I came up with this 11004-02 from Celprogen. Do you know any others?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
11 answers
Hello everyone,
I used ExoSAP-IT™ PCR Product Cleanup Reagent for PCR purification, then I cleaned up the sequencing PCR with different clean up kit (spin columns kit) and I got an excellent sequencing results after applying the sample in the analyzer.
I am trying now to use the ExoSAP-IT reagent for both purification and cleanup steps. I used 10ul of sequencing PCR product with 4ul ExoSAP-IT reagent for cleaning then I loaded the total volume on the analyzer after the two steps of incubation (15 min 37C then 15 min 80C).
unfortunately, I got a very bad sequencing results.
Any suggested for trouble-shoot please?
Relevant answer
Answer
My answer will come much too late for you but may be important for any new readers of this question . EXO-SAP is an excellent process but it does have one major problem. It cannot digest double stranded DNA which is good for your template but if the primer has a G quadruplex or can form a loop then exosap will not destroy all of that primer and then in the sequencing reaction you may have 2 primers not just the one sequencing primer that you added so the sequencing will be a mixture of 2 sequences and will be a mess
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
15 answers
Hi,guys!
Does anyone know the difference between 2X and 5X sds loading buffer?  It is said that maybe you cannot get appropriate results using 5X Loading buffer. Does anyone know the reasons? 
Thanks a lot
zhiyuan
Relevant answer
Answer
This question is old but it might help someone. In my response, I use loading buffer and sample buffer interchangeably.
Question ( taken from Harpal Singh comment) : why we prepare or use different concentration of buffer (2X, 5X, 6X, 10X) when finally we use as 1X during final working solution
Answer:
If you have a sample that has low protein concentration, you would use a higher concentration of the sample buffer. This is because you don't need as much volume of the high concentrated sample buffer (ex. 5X) to dilute to 1X as you would a lower concentrated buffer ( ex. 2X). Therefore, you can essentially load a more concentrated sample.
Question: Does anyone know the difference between 2X and 5X sds loading buffer?
Answer:
The difference is the starting concentration of the sample or loading buffer. 5X sample buffer is more concentrated than 2X buffer. We always load 1X on a gel.
- To prepare samples in 2X sample buffer, dilute to 1X using 1:1 ratio ( sample: sample buffer)
- To prepare samples in 5X sample buffer, dilute to 1X using 4:1 ratio (sample: sample buffer)
Question: It is said that maybe you cannot get appropriate results using 5X Loading buffer.
Answer: You will get the same results because regardless of the concentration of loading buffer you use, we will dilute to 1X prior to loading.
Here is a good website from University of Vermont that provide examples of common lab calculations:
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
20 answers
We are trying to isolate CD63+ exosomes in order to characterize them by electronic microscopy, Nanosight and ultimately by proteomics/transcriptomics. To isolate them we use the “Total Exosome Isolation” kit (Invitrogen cat#4478359) obtaining the total exosome population from our cell’s culture media followed by and immunoisolation of the CD63+ exosomes subpopulation using the Exosome – Human CD63 Isolation/Detection kit (Invitrogen cat#10606D). This second kit consists on magnetic beads coated with anti-CD63 antibodies. Our main concern before analysing the particles that we obtain is detaching the exosomes from the beads, especially for Nanosight evaluation. The techsupport team from Invitrogen could not recommend us any buffer but their suggestion was using a solution with a high salt concentration or low pH. Still, they are not sure it will work.
Can anyone suggest us a buffer or strategy to detach the exosomes from the beads’ surface?
Relevant answer
Answer
Stefano, yes, I called SBI and they told me that it is possible to purchase only the exoflowbuffer2. You have to call them, it is not possible to order online.
My question now is if the exoflowbuffer2 would also dissociate the antibody from the exosome, since in my case, I need the exosomes alone (without bead or antibody) to treat cells.
TIA in case anyone knows the answer to that question!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
7 answers
Hello Everyone
I tried to differentiate Embryoid bodies (EBs) from mouse Embryonic Stem cells (E14tg2a) following the protocol I attached. However i failed during the process because despite cells aggregate and accumulate they don't differentiate and form an Embryoid body. I already tried with a larger amount of cells (1000 cells per Embryoid body) in the same medium and they formed correctly but when are treated with Activin A (5 ng/ml and 50 ng/ml) mesoderm isn't induced (what is my principal purpose) so i decided to try with a lowest amount of cells and according to my literature research 250 cells is a the lowest amount feasible to differentiate into an embryoid body. Any suggestions will be well received.
Relevant answer
Answer
I would like to ask how do you change the medium in the embryoid body culture? I am using a 96 well plate and I have to change the medium every day.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
18 answers
I have transformed my cloned plasmid DNA into bacteria and cultured bacteria. Then, I extracted DNA from bacteria and run in 0.5% agarose gel. But I am not seeing any DNA band except ladder.
(In nanodrop, the conc. was 86ng/microliter, but 260/280 ratio was 1.62)
To check the gel, I had run another DNA besides this DNA. But I found the band of another DNA.
What could be the problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, Rahul Mallick,
I think your plasmid may lose during plasmid amplification in bacteria, in this case, slowing down the rotation speed would be helpful. Or the plasmid was not extracted from bacteria, you should optimize your plasmid extraction method.
We launched a product of Lipogene, suitable for transfection, comparable to lipofectamine 3000, but with fewer cytotoxic effects. You could find the protocol of it attached.
Hope it helps.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
We are looking for a good antibody for plasma/serum zonulin (haptoglobin 2). There are few antibodies in the market but the problem most of them don´t have any citation. Some of them are not correctly mapped. We want to see all of the possible bands (alpha chains, or intact peptide  seq). We are planning to do western blot. 
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Quite old question, but it may still be interesting to someone else. Unfortunately, there are only predatory ELISA kits commercially available (for instance Immundiagnostik and Cusabio as the most common, but there are many others) for "zonulin", to understanding of zonulin being the same protein as pre-haptoglobin 2 has to be carefully taken, as a quick BLAST search will give that sequence to be gamma immunoglobulin heavy chain.
This considered, one should look at these papers on Immunodiagnostik kit ( )and on CusaBio kit ( )
Zonulin as shown in the original publication is definitely not pre-haptoglobin 2. However, this paper ( ) suggests that it is, even if the sequence of zonulin has still not been described whatsoever. There is a good pre-haptoglobin 2 antibody, but it is not commercially available ( ), but this one fits genotyping of Hp genes. Have fun!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
Hello researchers
I have a fresh oral tissue samples collected by Rovers Orcellex Brush , unfortunately I can not use any kit.
Please, I need trusted protocol to extract DNA from this brush .
Best regard
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Hayder
You can find a good protocol in http://mcblabprotocols.com/protocols
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
I am trying to do Laser Capture Micro-dissection on samples that have been frozen at -80C, for many years. My purpose is to isolate specific cell type and isolate RNA for RNA-seq experiment. I have read some reports saying that it is not possible to use OCT if your tissue is already frozen. My question now if this is just a technical issue that can be solved or some serious problem with no solution?
Relevant answer
Answer
HELP!! my tissue sections have thawed overnight in OCT medium, can I salvage them? HOW?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
3 answers
I am doing RNA immunoprecipitation, using the RNA TRAP technology, with which you can capture actively translating ribosomes with the L10 ribosomal subunit fused with GFP, using GFP antibody coated magnetic beads. Right now I'm testing it on HEK293T cells transfected with L10-GFP and I am having trouble finding good reference genes / controls for qPCR.
GADPH & b-actin seem to be differentially expressed between the IP & the unbound (the supernatant of the IP) fractions, which result in very different & unreliable results when I look at enrichment of GFP between IP & unbound. For example, b-actin sometimes shows Ct value difference of 5 between IP & unbound fraction, of the sample.. Actually b-actin seems to be 'enriched' in the IP sample (so I suspect it binds to the beads..)
What do you suggest I do? Should I compare with the input sample? n
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, I know this topic may be a while ago. But I recently gained some knowledge from somewhere else about what should be used as RIP-qPCR controls.
Theoretically, there is "no" proper controls when assessing RIP-qPCR, since regular internal controls such as gapdh, actin, tubulin, they should normally not be bound by the RBP of interest, which in theory, should not be in your IP-ed RNAs. I got a calculation chart downloaded from Sigma to show how to calculate ChIP and RIP-qPCR fold change, which is, you have your input, anti-RBP, and anti-IgG RNAs, input here just serves as one kind of control that amplicons will be amplified using IP-ed RNAs can be amplified in your input. Then, the comparison should only be done between anti-RBP RNA and anti-IgG RNA (none of them should contain gapdh, actin or tubulin), but you know they came from the same amount of cells (you control this), then the only thing you should do is to directly test your amplicons of interest, and calculate the (fold compared to IgG) of your anti-RBP IP-ed RNAs. Since anyway in a regular qPCR, internal control genes are only used to normalize RNA amount due to different cell numbers to start with.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hi everyone I was wondering if anyone had used the Jazz Mix Drosophila food from Fisher or WARDS instant Drosophila media from VWR in their research, and if you find it convenient and easy to use, and does the flies seem happy with it? If you have used it, do you continue to use it? Makes your life easier? Or if you don't like it why? Which one do you prefer if you have tried both?
Thanks for all the feedback I will really appreciate it :)
Relevant answer
Answer
Came across this while having breakfast with my younger daughter and thought I'd add a bit of history to Jazz mix. I formulated this some years ago for Grier Eubank's company (I don't recall its name), which was subsequently bought by Fisher. Our purpose was to get micronutrients into the food, which helps weak stocks. Of note, the name of my daughter is...Jazz.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
6 answers
Hi
I've been doing whole mount ISH on E9.5-10.5 mouse embryos (with DIG-labeled RNA probes). For a long time, I've been struggling with getting a decent signal before the background starts to become too strong (NBT/BCIP). On gel electrophoresis, the RNA probe seems ok, so I'm assuming the probe quality is ok and I've included several steps to reduce background (levamisole, acetic anhydride in TEA, RNAse).
After sectioning some embryos that were hybridized for a cardiac specific probe and showed a signal in the heart as well as some overall background, I found some weak expression in the heart, but also a very strong signal all over the embryo surface.
Has anyone seen this before? I've googled google extensively, but I have not been able to find a convincing answer. I suspect it may be residual background signal, but am also considering overfixation/suboptimal protK treatment causing suboptimal penetration of the probe (even though I do a 9-10 minute incubation with 10 ug/ml prot K at room temperature). 
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Maybe, you can try the longer and more specific RNA probes for your target mRNAs.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
I have an Env vector (5.5kb), Gag-pol vector (12.5 kb) and a gene of interest (8.7 kb) to be transfected using lipofectamine to 293T cells. According to the protocol of lipofectamine the concentration of DNA to be used is 500ng per well.
My question is, if I have three vectors of different sizes how should I calculate the concentration to be used? 5ug of 5.5kb vector carry more particles compared to 12.5 kb vector - how to calculate the concentration of these to bring equality for viral protein preparation? I am confused, please help. Protocol is attached for reference.
Relevant answer
Answer
Here is the lentivirus protocol, hope it can help you with the following step.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Biological Techniques
Question
5 answers
Dear all,
I am in the middle of an experiment of sequencing the retinoic acid receptor (OCX 32) gene in Guinea fowl, and because there is no published one for Guinea fowl I tried to use chicken sequence and turkey sequence but I got nothing. However I tried several times with different primers, what should I do? Please advice.
Nada
Relevant answer
Answer
Retinoic acid receptor is present only in order Anseriformes. Only in ducks and geese and you wont get in guinea fowls, chicken, turkey etc..