Science topic

Plating - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Plating, and find Plating experts.
Questions related to Plating
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
I wanted to know the value of total flavonoid content in mgQE/gm. Total volume I kept in well plate is 200 µl in which extract was 20 µl. Anyone please help me with this problem
Relevant answer
Answer
Rishibha Gupta Thank you so much for providing clear answer.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Please send me pictures explaining how to simulate buckling of shear stresses in Abaqus 3D with hinged and fixed support ?
Relevant answer
Answer
It is easy. You should watch the tutorial videos on YouTube. Use LOAD and BOundary condition in ABAQUS.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I prepared an enrichment media making use of the two samples spoilt Sheabutter and Ghee (differently) and it was cultured on Olive oil agar using pour plate method. The organisms were subcultured to get pure isolates which was screened by plating them each on two different media; Tween80 agar and Tween80 with phenol red using a 5mm cork borer. Clear zones of hydrolysis was not observed and there was also no color change from red to yellow in the tween80 with phenol red media which would have indicated the presence of Lipase producing Fungi.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hey Sofiyat, I would take a step wise approach: first isolation, second lipase activity confirmation. I’ll focus on isolation. If you have any evidence the fungi grow through the sample, then you could try break open the piece of butter or eventually cut a layer off with a sterile tool. Then you would take a small chunk of core butter and dilute it, probably with Tween80. Make serial dilutions (~3) and plate 100 uL of each in different media. Spread with a digralski loop or sterile beads. This should help isolating strains with different abundance in the original sample. I would expect these strains to grow very slow.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
I am checking GFP fluorescence level in heme sensor. 200 ul of sample was loaded in black flat bottom 96 well plate in H1 Synergy machine. Temperature was 30 degree.
I am using S. cerevisiae WT in W303 background as control.
Relevant answer
Answer
There will be some level of autofluorescence from blank cells without eGFP. This is to be deducted from your samples.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
5 answers
We are screening for bacteria capable of producing extracellular protease ( / proteinase / peptidase). We focus on Lactobacillaceae like Lactobacillus helveticus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri etc. We use agar plates with UHT skimmed milk. We insert the pippette tip with bacterial suspension into the agar plate and eject the pipette.
After a few days of incubation, we indeed see the clerance zones, but, immediately around the injection site, there is a white zone first and the cleared halo is on the edge of it. See the photo.
What is the white zone ? Is seems to be located inside the agar layer, neither on the surface nor at the bottom of the agar plate. Is it the biomass of lactobacilli growing inside the agar ? Or some casein metabolite / precipitate ? Or something else ?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have seen this article, where opaque zone around the colony is interpreted as weak proteolysis, and clear zone means strong proteolysis.
I would still wellcome some more information. It seems like I have opaque zone surrounded by a clear halo. Why would I have weak proteolysis near the colony and strong proteolysis further away ?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
For this test, the bacterial cultures were streaked on Pikovskaya’s
agar medium (HiMedia Laboratories, India) and supplied
with tricalcium phosphate in Petri plates. Plates were then
incubated at 28 + - 2 degrees C for 72–96 h. The formation of
clear halo zones encircling the bacterial colonies indicated
phosphate solubilization.
1. What would be the concentration and volume of tricalcium phosphate if added to 1L media bottle
2. What would be the concentration and volume of tricalcium phosphate if added to Petri dish?
Do we add before autoclaving the media or after autoclaving?
Relevant answer
Answer
According to Pikovskaya R, Pikovskaya RI. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with the vital activity of some microbial species. Microbiol. 1948;17:362–70,
PKO liquid medium consist of NaCl 0.3 g, Glucose 10 g, KCl 0.3 g, Ca3(PO4)2 - 5 g, (NH4)2SO4 0.5 g, MgSO4· 7H2O 0.3 g, MnSO4 0.03 g, FeSO4· 7H2O 0.03 g, distilled water 1000 mL, pH 7.0–7.2, agar 15-20 g, autoclave (30 min).
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
Hey,
I would like to know more about HRM analysing. can anyone assist me regarding the analysing the data which were taken from this experiment?!
I have used MeltDoctor reagent and I calibrated quantstudio 3 with HRM plate in advance. Attached you can see the result from my samples.
Thank you in advance.
Fatemeh
Relevant answer
Answer
How big is your HRM amplicon? And what are you targetting? A single SNP? Methylation?? From the melting curves, it looks like your amplicons might be quite large ??
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
Hello all. I purified some plasmids after doing precultures of strains from a 2-month old plate in -4 degrees. The PCR results were fine and I used theses plasmids to transform Agrobacterium cells. Should I be concerned about physiological changes for these strains from the old plate or even mutations concerning their genetic material ? (PS: I have the strains in glycerol too and I know that spread from glycerol stock should be a best practice).
Relevant answer
Answer
I wouldn't use 2 month old plates unless there was no other option, personally.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
I have a monoclinic C2 space group single crystal sample glued to a tenon plate. I know the surface normal direction and the edge plan of the crystal. Also, I know the XY plane of the tenon plate. How can I get the Euler angles to relate the frames of the sample and the tenon plate (Lab frame)?
Any article or suggestion on how to go about this problem will be much appreciated. Thanks in advance
(I have also attached a picture of the crystal on the plate. The circle in the picture marks the surface normal direction (1 0 -2) and the edge plane is (0 1 0). The blue vectors represent the frame of the tenon plate) ​
Relevant answer
Answer
Please read Busing-Levy articles; if you want, I can send them to you. They have developed an algorithm called, the Busing - Levy algorithm, which involves a lot of Matrix operations only. First, you should use a U Matrix called a Material Matrix. Then B Matrix. After finding these two matrices one can find out the angles for the h k l values and scan it for all the planes and finally collect the data and solve the single crystal structure.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
The image attached is a streak plate for DH5a cells on a non-antibiotic plate. I have white colonies visible at the start of my streaking [ I drew an initial deposit]. I also see these white colonies in the transformed plate with carbenicillin [image not attached]. In addition, when non-antibiotic fresh plates were incubated without inoculation, 3-4 colonies were found. Do my incubator needs cleaning?
Relevant answer
Answer
You may look into the article here. Hope it helps
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Good day to everyone,
I have little experience with culturing yeast, so I was wondering if someone could help with an issue I've encountered. I haven't seen many defined colonies from my plates of baker's yeast grown on agar, but I have been seeing these cloudy and spreading colonies of growth, and I am questioning if these were still yeast. Non of my control plates seem to have this issue, only certain treatement plates (the pink-tinted plate is also agar, just with some coloring).
Could this be contamination, perhaps from bacteria or some other fungi?
I appreciate any help, as I would like to avoid this in the future!
Best regards.
Relevant answer
Answer
You may look into the article here. Hope it helps
10.1007/s13762-024-05635-3
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone,
I am currently growing Human microglia cells HMC3 in 100 mm plate.
My question is what is the estimated Protein concentration (within range) of 1 ml HMC3 cell lysate? I usually start cell lysis at 80-90% confluency.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
We usually use the Bradford protein assays, both Bradford and BCA have advantages and disadvantages, but both are commonly used.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
6 answers
Hi there,
I am having problems with 50ul Matrigel domes completely dissolving in 24 well plates. I am trying to generate organoid cultures, but when I remove the culture media after 2 days the domes are either gone or are partially dissolved. I use 2:1 matrigel:media ratio. I thawed the main vial of matrigel at 4 degrees overnight then put 200ul aliquots at -20 degrees. When they are needed aliquots are defrosted on ice, 24 well plates are preincubated in a 37 degree incubator and I use ice cold tips to establish the domes. I leave the plates at 37 for over an hour before adding warm media very carefully to each well. I have noticed the matrigel looks a bit soft before the media goes on. What am I doing wrong? Surely it should polymerize completely at 37? Anyone else found this or can you identify where I am going wrong?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Victoria Gillan . Have you got a solution for the matrigel dissolving issue? I am currently facing the same problem. I dissolved the cell pellet in a 1:1 Matrigel: Media ratio and allowed it to polymerize for 10 minutes in a 37C incubator by inverting the plate. When the media is added, the dome dissolved in some wells and becomes soft in others. When observed the next day, all the domes were dissolved. Kindly help me out.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
I am trying to clone a 1.3kb insert in a 3 kb vector. after double digestion of the vector, when I am checking on gel it is coming on desired length, but after ligation am getting almost same number of colonies in self (vector only) and test plates. after screening via colony PCR, none of the colonies had the insert. How to overcome this issue?
Relevant answer
Answer
If you're performing a self-ligation reaction and a control reaction (test) without any insert, and you're observing the same number of colonies in both, it suggests that the ligation reaction has occurred, but there hasn't been successful insertion of any additional DNA fragment (insert) into the vector during the ligation process.
Here are a few reasons why you might observe the same number of colonies in both reactions:
  1. Vector Self-Ligation: The vector itself may have undergone self-ligation, resulting in circularization of the vector without any insert. This can happen when the vector DNA molecules close upon themselves due to the ligation reaction, forming circular DNA molecules that are capable of transforming host cells and forming colonies.
  2. Incomplete Digestion: If you're using restriction enzymes to digest both the vector and the insert DNA, incomplete digestion of the vector or insert could occur, leading to self-ligation of partially digested fragments. This can result in colonies even in the absence of an insert.
  3. Background Colonies: Sometimes, bacterial cells can spontaneously generate colonies due to factors unrelated to the experimental manipulation. These background colonies can contribute to the observed colony count in both the self-ligation and test reactions.
  4. Contamination: Contamination with DNA fragments from previous reactions or from the environment can also lead to the formation of colonies.
To troubleshoot and confirm whether the ligation reaction was successful but without insert, you can:
  • Perform colony PCR using primers that anneal to sequences flanking the insertion site in your vector. If no insert was successfully ligated, you will amplify the empty vector sequence.
  • Sequence a few colonies to verify if they contain the expected sequence of the vector without any insert.
If you confirm that the self-ligation reaction occurred but no insert was successfully ligated, you may need to optimize your ligation conditions, ensure complete digestion of the vector and insert, and carefully monitor for contamination to improve the efficiency of your ligation reactions.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Does anyone have guidance on coating 96-well plates with collagen-I? Looking for a protocol. We are using Corning® Collagen I, Rat Tail, 100 mg.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Jacob Leighty,
Use the following protocol.
1. Determine the volume of collagen-I solution needed.
 2. Dilute collagen-I to 50ug/ml in 0.02M acetic acid to the needed volume.
 3. Add diluted collagen at 5ug/cm^2 surface area. The area of a well for a 96- well plate is 0.33 cm^2. To coat 5ug/cm^2 of collagen-I, you will need 1.65ug of collagen-I per well in a 96 well plate i.e.,(5 x 0.33/1=1.65ug). You will use 50ul volume to cover a well of a 96 well plate.Therefore, you will need 1.65ug/50ul for each well.
4. Incubate for 1 hour at room temperature.
5. Carefully aspirate the remaining solution.
6. Rinse well 3 times to remove acid, using PBS or serum-free medium.
 7. The plate may be used immediately or air dried and stored at 2-8° C for up to one week under sterile conditions.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
I am a student conducting research for my course and I am having trouble in finding a pill for Ketoconazole. However, there are a lot of creams available in the pharmacies. Would it be possible to use that cream when testing against grown fungi on plates?
Relevant answer
Answer
Using topical cream as the source of antibiotic for the disk diffusion method may not be the most reliable or standard approach. The disk diffusion method typically requires the use of standardized antibiotic disks containing specific concentrations of antibiotics. These disks are manufactured under controlled conditions to ensure accuracy and reproducibility of results.
Topical creams may contain various other ingredients besides the active antibiotic compound, which could interfere with the diffusion of the antibiotic into the agar medium or affect the results of the test. Additionally, the concentration of the antibiotic in a topical cream may not be suitable for the disk diffusion method.
If you need to perform the disk diffusion method, it's best to use commercially available antibiotic disks that are specifically designed for this purpose and have been validated for accuracy and reliability. If you're looking to test the efficacy of a topical cream, it's more appropriate to use other methods such as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Hello everyone,
I am facing a frustrating issue with the TC28a2 cell line. After treatment with staurosporine at concentrations of 25nM, 50nM, and 100nM, the cells begin detaching during the first media aspiration when I switch to fresh complete media. This problem occurs regardless of the incubation time. Does anyone have any advice on how to aspirate the media without losing cells?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Rogerio,
In addition to staurosporine treated arms (25nM-100nM), do you also have a control arm that has not been treated with staurosporine ?
Is it possible that staurosporine is simply cytotoxic to your TC28a2 cell line and that’s why they are detaching?
staurosporine is commonly used to induce apoptosis in various cell lines. I’ve used staurosporine for that purpose in HCEC-1CT cell line( human colon epithelial cells) and some tumor cell lines( HUH-7 and NG108-15).
After treatment with staurosporine, cells become round and detach. Under microscope, you can tell that membrane integrity is compromised.
I understand that staurosporine is used as a differentiating agent in chondrocytes. However, there are some literature out there stating that staurosporine can also induced apoptosis in chondrocyte monolayer.
I would simply treat your arms as suspension cells after detachment. Collect them, pellet them and check their viability.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Dear all,
For my last two experiments, my supposedly endothelial cells (differentiated from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, at passage ~35) have detached from Transwell inserts 1-2 days following seeding, looking as if I trypsinized them, and creating some cell clumps.
I expand (for 2 days) and differentiate (for 3 days) them in 48-well plates. Then I expose them to endothelial medium for one day. On the second day of endothalial medium, I transfer them to Transwell inserts that have been coated with Fibronectin and Collagen Type I. When I check 3-4 hours after seeding, I observe that they nicely attach. However, either the next day or the other day, they detach from the Transwells (Corning 3740) and I can't find the reason why.
In both of the experiments, I changed the media of the Transwells the following day after seeding. I inspected the cells both before and after the medium change. In one of them, the cells detached right after medium change although I aspirated the old medium very slowly (on the minimum speed of the vacuum suction and without touching to the membrane). In the other experiment, the cells were (mostly) fine after the medium change. But the next day after medium change (two days after seeding onto Transwells) they had detached.
The possibilities I could rule out are:
- There should be no problem with the medium contents/temperature/CO2 concentration/coating because I'm seeding the same cells to coated 48-well plates as well and applying the same conditions on them; and they stay healthy & alive.
- There is no contamination in the plates.
- It's not because they are over-crowded, I'm trying to form a monolayer indeed but they are sparsely distributed and thus they shouldn't be dying from over-confluency.
- I believe it is not about the force my medium change exerts on the cells either, because in one of the experiments cells looked fine after the medium change.
What do you think the reason could be?
Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Mohammad,
Thanks a lot for sharing your experience!
I switched to iPSCs after trying with MSCs for a long time, and keep failing. I usually did not have a problem with the iPSC-derived endothelial cells (iECs) on Transwells, but I was doing half-medium change each day. They were fine when I had to do whole-medium change for a permeability assay too, but I'm changing the media slowly, and never use vacuum suction on Transwells. Although this may explain why the MSCs were detaching right after the media change, I'm still clueless about why they would detach later despite looking fine immediately after a medium change.
We are culturing iECs as well as HUVECs on PDMS microfluidic chips, besides Transwells. For iECs, we coat the PDMS surfaces with 100 ug/mL Fibronectin and 50 ug/mL Collagen type I (this is the same recipe we use for Transwells), following a 1-hour surface activation with UV light (for HUVECs, the Collagen concentration is 100 ug/mL). I believe your Fibronectin concentration should suffice. The endothelial cells are indeed sensitive to medium change from what we have observed, so we do it as slow as possible. Despite this, for instance yesterday evening, most of my iECs had detached from the microfluidic chip that they were nicely attached yesterday morning (and they were under a constant flow of 4 uL/h, so I did not exert an extra force with micropipettes for medium change). There must be reasons, which we're not yet aware of, for the detachment problem, thus I'm looking forward to hearing from others too!
Best regards,
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
Hey there,
for an experiment I am using the heating plate. I want to heat a glycerol bath to 120°C. The magneting stirring is off. Temp set at 120°C. Now, as the temperature nears 120°C (e.g. at 110°C) an error ALL6 appears. I tried it with two different devices, the same happened to both.
In the manual it says, the error stands for when no heat increase is detected by the thermometer. Does anyone have a clue, why this happened? The temperature is still to increase after 110°C.
Thanks for a suggestion!
Regards, Vera
Relevant answer
Answer
'Afternoon Vera,
To be fair, the typical 'nice' thermocouple or Pt100 thermometer has an intrinsic accuracy of +- 0.5 to 1.0 K.
<at least - can be higher!>
So if the display shows 99°C, there really isn't a physical difference if it were to show 100°C.
As to why there is such a large discrepancy (20°C!) between the target and actual temperatures, that is a puzzle.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
What are the causes of the heat being produced in the inner core and how slab pull drives the movement of tectonic plates?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr Suresh Kumar thank you for your contribution to the discussion
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
8 answers
How does matter and energy flow across the Earth and flow of energy as heat in Earth's interior contribute to the movement of tectonic plates?
Relevant answer
Answer
The movement of tectonic plates are primarly driven by the mantle convection, heat transfer and by the plume activity.
The convection is due to the radioactive elements decay releases the heat and residual heat left since the formation of the prototype planet which causes the matle material to become less dense, so that the less dense material rise and cold lithospherric slab sinks. This creates the continous cycle. The convection is the major contribution of heat trafnser whcich in terms creat the plate tectonics cycle.
The heat is also transfer by condction as well as radiation. But their contribution is minor. Rk Naresh
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
7 answers
I'm challenging bacteria with different compounds, then plating the suspension on LB agar to assess CFU and understand the bactericidal properties of my compounds. However, I'm encountering significant CFU variability between replicates of the same conditions and even controls. For example, in a recent experiment, I obtained counts of 57, 31, and 9 on three different LB plates where the bacteria were only exposed to PBS. I'm vortexing the bacterial suspension before adding it to the compounds and trying to be as uniform and consistent as possible with everything, but still experiencing a lot of variability. Any tips would be highly appreciated!
Relevant answer
Answer
Are you vortexing your samples/dilutions right before plating? They will settle to the bottom of tubes over time, even when shaken.
But honestly, having less than 1 log of variability between replicates of the same condition when plating bacteria for CFUs isn't that uncommon or concerning. You'll almost never end up with 50, 53 and 49 colonies from three replicates.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Good morning, I urgently need to perform ddPCR analysis on some samples using a QX200 Droplet Reader that's been sitting in my lab for a while. A technician came in last month to set it up and I successfully performed an experiment last Friday. On Monday, though, I switched on the Reader and noticed that none of the PCR plates I had prepared where recognized by the instrument. The green light that usually flashes green when you insert a plate doesn't light up and the software doesn't allow me to start the run. I used original Bio-Rad plates that were successfully recognized when placed in another QX200 droplet reader from a different facility. As suggested by the technician, I unmounted and cleaned the plate support, but nothing changed. We replaced both the waste and oil bottles, but without success.
Perhaps some of you fellow researchers have experienced a similar issue with this device? Thank you so much for your kind advice.
Relevant answer
Answer
If the QX200 Droplet Reader is not recognizing the plate during digital PCR (ddPCR), there could be several potential issues to consider:
  1. Plate Compatibility: Ensure that the plate being used is compatible with the QX200 Droplet Reader. Different plate formats or types may not be recognized properly.
  2. Plate Positioning: Make sure that the plate is correctly positioned in the reader. Ensure that it is aligned according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  3. Plate Condition: Check the condition of the plate for any damage or deformities that may prevent proper recognition by the reader.
  4. Software Compatibility: Verify that the software being used with the QX200 Droplet Reader is compatible with the device and the plate format being used.
  5. Connection Issues: Ensure that the device is properly connected to the computer and that all connections are secure. A loose connection may prevent the reader from recognizing the plate.
  6. Software Settings: Check the settings in the software to ensure that the correct plate type and format are selected. Incorrect settings may result in the reader not recognizing the plate.
  7. Firmware Updates: Ensure that the firmware of the QX200 Droplet Reader is up-to-date. Updates may include improvements or fixes that address recognition issues.
  8. Technical Support: If the issue persists, contact technical support from the manufacturer of the QX200 Droplet Reader for further assistance. They can provide troubleshooting guidance and may recommend additional steps to resolve the issue.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
I got some bands of my compound in TLC. I want to get those compounds for further analysis means for quantification purpose. After scratching the band I have mixed with methanol in a conical flask and mixed throughly with magnetic stirrer for 15 mins. After this i want to filter this solvent. My question is for this filtration which filter paper I will prefer, wheather I will go for whatman 40 or 42 grade or something else.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Subhrakanta Jena,
The pore size of the filter paper can be compared with the diameter of silica, and the one with a smaller pore size than the diameter of silica can be selected for filtration.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
I have recently started working with arabidopsis and every time I pour the agar plates, I start seeing contamination after 3rd or 4th day.
Usually, there is no contamination after I pour the agar and let it sit for one day.
The contamination occurs on some of the seedlings, as well as some random parts of the plate.
I try not to pass my hands from on top of the plates, I UV the hood and the plates for 30 mins, and always clean the hood with 70% ethanol before starting.
I am open to any suggestions on how to improve myself.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you are using glass petri plates(autoclavable), make sure you choose a perfect pair otherwise if there is any space left in between then it could be a source of contamination.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
Good morning Research Gate scientists
I have an LB agar plate for DH5a bacteria cell storage at 4C for 6 weeks, and I tried to subculture to a new plate plenty of times but I could not get colonies at all. the colony on the storged plate is not white, as usual, It is a light yellow color.
Then, I tried to subculture using a glycerol stock, I used a loop dipped deeply on the stock, and one loop streaked on the agar plate but still, no colony appeared on the agar surface, though I tried to avoid thaw-freezing for the stock.
No antibiotic was added to the plates because it was just a simple bacteria subculture. And plates were warmed and dried before subculture and the plates were incubated at 37 C overnight, I don't know the problems. Thanks in advance for your assist
Relevant answer
Answer
What medium is in your plates? Are they LB or similar or a minimal medium?
Secondly, DH5a is a RecA- strain (as are most E. coli cloning hosts). These do not survive long on plates, maybe 2 weeks max. So I think everything is dead on your 6 week old plate.
However I don't understand why the frozen stock did not grow, which is why I asked about the medium you are using. You might grab a small chunk of the -80 stock and put in liquid broth to let it grow then streak out for single colonies. If you get it to grow then I would make a new -80 stock.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
So, I am doing electrodeposition of Zn onto carbon fabric, which is my working electrode. As reference electrode, I used Ag7AgCl in 3M KCl, and as counter electrode, I used a Zn plate. After varying the current density, I see that the cathodic potential increases. Is it something to do with Gibbs energy? or the ease of overcoming the barrier to form Zn onto the cathode?
Relevant answer
Answer
Your calculation of the combined electrode potential (E = E⁰_Zn -E⁰_Ag/AgCl) is correct
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
5 answers
Most staining protocols for flow cytometry in 96-well plates use V-shape or U-shape plates. I would like to ask if staining could also be done in flat-bottom plates.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you very much Hanh Hong Nguyen
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
I have a plasmid with kanamycine antibiotic resistant gene and Bar as a marker gene. I need to transfer this plasmid into AGL-1 strain of agrobacterium tumefaciens. I faced a problem when I follow the protocol steps of transformation. I did not get bacterial colony even after 2-days of a LB media plate having Kan 50ug/ml.
Protocol steps
1- Take competent cells from -80 C.
2- Add 5ul of plasmid having conc. 50ng/ul in 100 ul of AGL-1 BACTERIA.
3- Keep on ice for 30 min.
4- put in liquid nitrogen for 5 min
5- keep on heat bath for 5 min.
6- keep on ice for 5-min again.
7- add 800ul of LB without antibiotic (Kan)
8- Shake for 2-hrs at 28 C.
9- spread on LB media plate with kan 50ug/ml. Keep these plates on 28 C for 2-days.
But did not get the bacterial colony.
These are the protocol steps which I followed. Anyone can guide me where I am doing mistake?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello, remove kanamycin from nutrient media and see do you have a grow of culture or not, if you see grow it mens kanamycin resistance gene transfection or expression problem.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
5 answers
Hello! I am growing transfected cells in 24 well plate. on the bottom of each well i have a small glass cover-slip. so the cells adhere to that cover slip. I am using this method because its very easy to transfer that glass to a slide and then analyse for fluorescence. the only problem is that DAPI staining efficiency is super low. I am simply covering the glass on which the cells are growing with DAPI for 5 minutes and then analyzing. Is there another protocol that I should use in this case?
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Hello, my question is if SPL well white plates (30196) are autoclavable? I didn't find any information in Technical Data Sheet. Thank you for your answers.
Relevant answer
Answer
Malcolm Nobre thank you very much.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
Why does the alpha ray not penetrate the paper? In the same way, why doesn't beta ray pass through aluminum plate, X-ray and gamma ray pass through lead plate and neutron radiation pass through water or solution?
What is meant by neutron beam?
Can X-ray photons be explained with fundamental particles such as electrons, protons, or neutrons?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Dr. @Gerhard Martens ,
you're welcome.
Thank you so much for your help, My question was solved by your answer.
Best Regards.
Nesa.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
6 answers
How do convection currents drive the movement of tectonic plates and atmospheric and oceanic circulation determine regional climate?
Relevant answer
Answer
The magma becomes attached to crust as the magma cools. The attached crust moves with the magma as the magma is moves by the convection currents. The convection currents in the magma moves the attached crust of the tectonic plates. Convection currents drive the movement of Earth's rigid tectonic plates in the planet's fluid molten mantle. In places where convection currents rise up towards the crust's surface, tectonic plates move away from each other in a process as seafloor spreading. Heat from Earth's interior causes currents of hot rising magma and cooler sinking magma to flow, moving the crust along with them. Convection currents occur in the mantle due to the heating of the Earth's interior. The two statements that describe events that help drive tectonic plate movement are convection currents cause hotter magma to rise and cooler magma to sink and subduction plates cause cooling at convergent boundaries. Diverging boundaries are where the convection currents move upwards. Converging boundaries are where convention current move downward. When a ocean plate meets a continental plate in a convergent boundary the mantle current carrying the ocean plate is forced downward. The energy for all that movement comes from sunlight that is absorbed and re-radiated by the surface of the Earth and the rotation of the Earth. Atmospheric circulation, along with ocean circulation, distributes heat across the entire surface of the Earth, bringing us our daily weather and shaping regional climates. The reason we have different weather patterns, jet streams, deserts and prevailing winds is all because of the global atmospheric circulation caused by the rotation of the Earth and the amount of heat different parts of the globe receive. Heating and cooling of the fluid, changes in the fluid's density, and the force of gravity combine to set convection currents in motion. Heat from the core and the mantle causes convection currents in the mantle. This is how the heat is transferred, and how the earth's plates are able to move.Heating and cooling of the fluid, changes in the fluid's density, and the force of gravity combine to set convection currents in motion. Heat from the core and the mantle causes convection currents in the mantle. This is how the heat is transferred, and how the earth's plates are able to move.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Hi,
I am trying to subclone iPSCs by plating 200-300 cells in 6 wells previously coated with geltrex. When I plate them I use 10uM of rock inhibitor and in theory I j
keep it until a nice colony is formed. I tried both E8 and stem flex media. however the day after I plate them, I got single cells but then after 2-3days they die or they remain as single cells without proliferating. I Have tried to change their media every other day as well as every day (I thought maybe the rock inhibitor at 37 degree got degraded). Any suggestion?
Relevant answer
Answer
The cell seeding density of 200-300 cells per 6 well is probably to low. iPSC like adjacent cells for better survival. You could try 48 or 24 well plates and/or more cells. The thawing AND freezing protocol should be optimized. iPSC should be frozen approximately 2-4 days after passaging. Freezing them significantly later after the last passaging, strongly decreases cell survival after thawing. Please find further information attached.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Hi
In this simulation, i noticed that i have a electrical field inside a conductor almost in range of e-11.
this upper plate is connected to 10volt (DC) and by time dependent study it moves sinusoidal and lower plate is constrained.
Relevant answer
Answer
In a conductor, such as a metal, charges are free to move due to the presence of mobile electrons. When an external electric field is applied to a conductor, these free charges redistribute themselves within the material until they reach a stable configuration. This redistribution creates an electric field inside the conductor that exactly cancels out the external electric field.
However, it's important to note that this only happens in static conditions or when the conductor is in electrostatic equilibrium. In other words, the charges have stopped moving and there is no current flowing. If the electric field were not canceled out within the conductor, charges would continue to move until equilibrium is reached. This cancellation of the electric field inside the conductor is known as electrostatic shielding.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Hi anyone who reads this, I am a MRes student looking at antibiotic application on S. aureus biofilms. After disrupting my biofilm to quantify antibiotic application on TSA. I re exposed the same disrupted bacteria to TSB on a 96 well plate. The TSA plate quantified growth, whilst the TSB plate showed a lack of growth at some antibiotic concentrations that had grown on TSA. When re exposing the plated bacteria back to TSA there was a lack of growth.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, I had not done this as this was a while back, but growth was seen originally on TSA which is seen In my graph, but upon re exposure of the same bacteria that had been re incubated in TSB back onto TSA didn’t promote growth.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
Hi everyone,
Recently, I bought a new cell line named Tenocytes from a company.
I followed the manufacturer's instructions and used their medium and coating buffer.
However, I observed that the cell was not attached to the bottom, as shown in the pictures I attached below.
As you can observe here, I saw all cells are still alive. However, they do not attach to the bottom.
I would greatly appreciate your suggestions or any advice for my experiment.
Best regards,
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Tina Trinh ,
I would highly recommend to get in tough with the company asap, since they are stating this at the end of the link you have provided:
"Due to the sensitive nature of primary cells and cell lines, all quality related issues about the cells products must be reported back to us within ONE month period after receiving the products, no quality warranty (i.e. replacement of cells) will be provided after the ONE-Month period. Thank you for your understanding."
They should check their batch of the cell stock and give you maybe more clear thawing protocol.
We are usually thawing (different cells) like this:
Thaw the cells 30-60s with in a 37°C water bath (ice should/must still be visible which will keep the cells still cool). Than we are are transferring the cells into 10 ml pre-warmed medium I do use a pipet for that set to 800 µl. After 3-4 pipetting steps adding warm medium into the vial and removing than cells an the medium into the 10 ml reservoir, I spin the cells down (5 min 250 x g) aspirate the medium and plate the cells in new medium into the cell flask or dish. On the next day the medium is exchanged to get ridge of the rest of the DMSO.
Best wishes
Soenke
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
We bought this cell line from ATCC, and I attach a photo of a plate after passage 2. There are many small dots around the cells and it is making me concerned/suspicious of bacterial contamination. However, the description of the cell line suggests that "MDA-MB-468 (ATCC HTB-132) cells can be slow to attach and may produce large amounts of floating cells and debris."
Does anyone have any experience with this?
Thanks!
Ana
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
Thanks for your responses.
Yes, these cells are grown in L15 media with 10% FBS, with P/S, in an incubator without CO2. I don't observe any changes in media colour/transparency, and the cells seem to grow normally, although a bit slowly (I think they are still adjusting to being thawed).
I will inoculate some culture on LB tonight to know for sure.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I got the cells from ATCC and I want to plate them and start culturing. So far in anywhere I couldn't find which type of coating needed for the flasks, if ever needed?
Relevant answer
Answer
I believe you could use Poly D lysine
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Im looking to use H2O2 with my HEK293 cells to cause a stress response in order to see if the cells become more sensitive to externally applied electromagnet fields. I need the cells to still be adherent to my 96 well plate after treatment with H2O2 while still being stressed. Has anyone used H2O2 with HEK cells and still had the cells adhere and if so at what concentration of H2O2?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi. I've had them done when studying the protective effect of H. itama honey towards oxidatively stressed HEK293 cells.
The concentration of H2O2 I used to maintain HEK293 cell attachment to the flask is 100 μL of 1 mM. However, I recommend determining the IC50 of the H2O2 you plan to use in your lab, as it may differ from my conditions.
Typically, when inducing oxidative stress, cell death occurs, and as a normal observation, dead cells detach and clump together.
However, if you want to ensure cell attachment during stress, consider the following tips:
  1. Optimize the H2O2 concentration. Begin with a low concentration of hydrogen peroxide and gradually increase it while monitoring cell viability and attachment.
  2. Control exposure time. Limit the exposure time of H2O2 to your cells; shorter durations may help maintain cell viability while still inducing stress.
  3. Consider using substrate coating based on your experimental design.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I will incubate well plate for E.coli biofilm formation. After this I need to perform centrifugal filtration with Biofil 30kDa filters. Are there any tips, how to do it properly? And can I use NaCl or dH2O as solvent to first dissolve biofilm from wells and then transfer it to the filter?
And is it possible to use 24 well plate instead of 96 well plate? Or maybe plate with even less wells?
Relevant answer
Answer
First, it's important to note that biofilm formation is a complex process that can be influenced by various factors such as bacterial strain, nutrient availability, temperature, and surface topography. Therefore, it's essential to optimize the incubation conditions for your specific experimental setup.
Here are some general tips for performing centrifugal filtration with Biofil 30kDa filters:
Prepare the filters: Before starting the filtration process, make sure the Biofil 30kDa filters are properly prepared. According to the manufacturer's instructions, the filters should be sterilized by exposing them to UV light for 30 minutes. Additionally, you can also perform a quick rinse with sterile water to remove any potential contaminants.
Choose the appropriate solvent: When it comes to dissolving the biofilm and transferring it to the filter, you have two options: NaCl or dH2O. Both solvents are suitable for this process, but they have different properties that may affect the outcome. NaCl (sodium chloride) is a common solvent used in many biofilm studies, as it has a lower critical concentration than dH2O, which means it can dissolve biofilms more effectively. However, keep in mind that NaCl may also affect the biofilm's structure and stability. dH2O (deionized water), on the other hand, is a more gentle solvent that may be better suited for sensitive biofilms. Ultimately, the choice between NaCl and dH2O will depend on your specific experimental requirements and the properties of the biofilm you're working with.
Dissolve the biofilm: Once you've selected the solvent, add it to the wells containing the biofilm and gently mix it with a sterile pipette. Avoid vigorous agitation or sonication, as this can damage the biofilm. Let the mixture sit for a few minutes to allow the solvent to dissolve the biofilm effectively.
Transfer the biofilm to the filter: Use a sterile pipette to transfer the biofilm-solvent mixture to the Biofil 30kDa filter. Make sure to handle the filter carefully to avoid any potential contamination.
Wash the filter: After transferring the biofilm to the filter, wash it with sterile water or dH2O to remove any residual solvent and debris.
Dry the filter: Once the washing step is complete, gently remove excess water from the filter using a sterile paper towel or a lint-free cloth. This will help prevent any bacterial growth or contamination.
Store the filter: Finally, store the filter in a sterile container or bag until further analysis. Make sure to label the filter appropriately to avoid any confusion.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
Hello everyone,
I am trying to clone the gene of interest for the mRNA hybridization ( in situ)
after cloning, and miniprepre and restriction digestion, . I don't get the desired product on the gel .
only the vector size on the gel
I followed these steps:
1. PCR run
2. gel cut and extraction by Qiagen kit
3. Ligation : 5ul 2X ligation buffer ( promega), 3ul PCR product,1ul pGEMT easy vector( promega), 1ul ligase, 1hr at room temperature incubation.
4.plated on 100ul DH5-alpha cells
I have plated only on Ampicillin plates and also on X-GAL (150ul) and IPTG (50ul) on each plate . I have colonies on both plates. but they are very small in size . Are they non-specific colonies? size of the blue colonies and white colonies are same ( quite small) .I picked white colonies from ( Amp,X-gal , IPTG plates) and did miniprep then Restriction digestion. I don't see any insert into the plasmid.
I don't understand where the mistake is. Can anyone please guide me .Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
If the blue and white colonies are similar size then it should be ok, a few extra hours in the incubator would let them get bigger.
How big is your insert? Was the plasmid mini prep good so that you say plenty of vector size DNA?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
6 answers
Hello all,
I am confused about calculating the CFU/mL for my serial dilutions, for context I am conducting an experiment that involves creating a standard curve of absorbency (measured via spectrophotometry) against CFU/mL of each dilution. I have conducted the spectrophotometry and plated each of my serial dilutions but my confusion occured when I began calculating the CFU/mL and found that it increased as my samples got more dilute which logically is the opposite of what I expected. Furthermore, I am unsure if it possible to calculate the viable cells in each dilution as the calculation CFU/mL=(number of colonies*dilution factor)/volume plated, seems to be for calculating the number of viable cells in the origional sample.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
  1. Determine the concentration of cells in the diluted sample:Count the number of colonies on the petri plate after incubation. Divide this count by the amount of diluted sample added to the petri plate (in mL). The formula is: [ \text{CFU in diluted sample (cells/mL)} = \frac{\text{Number of colonies counted on the petri plate}}{\text{Amount of diluted sample added to the petri plate in mL}} ]
  2. Calculate the concentration of cells in the original sample:To find the CFU/mL in the original sample, multiply the CFU/mL from the diluted sample by the dilution factor. The formula is: [ \text{CFU/mL in original sample} = \text{CFU/mL in diluted sample} \times \text{Dilution factor} ]
Remember that the dilution factor accounts for the dilution performed during the serial dilution process. For example, if you counted 150 colonies on a plate with a dilution factor of 1:100, you can calculate the CFU/mL for the original sample using the above steps1
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I am currently setting up a two step treatment on HepG2 cells in a 96 well plate, using an antioxidant and a drug. Majority of the literature that I have consulted mention a pretreatment with the antioxidant, and then treatment using a drug. For the few treatments that I have set up, I give the tretament using antioxidant dissolved in media for 24 hours, remove the media, wash with PBS and then give the drug tretament (drug dissolved in media). My confusion here is : Is this protocol correct? Or do I keep the antioxidant containing media and just add the drug containing media on top of the antioxidant treatment, without removing the antioxidant and forgoing the PBS wash. Any clarification would be appreciated
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Malhar Desai,
Your using protocol is correct. But you do must without PBS washing. Both set up give best results.
Thank you
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Are there any (symbolic/algebric) mathematical tools/software particularly to perform all lengthy calculations of Variational Calculus in Structural mechanics (such as, deriving governing equations and boundary conditions of structures like plates, shells etc. from their Energy functionals, integration by-parts in 2D and 3D cases, analytical Finite element methods etc.) ?, Or people do always such calculations by hand?
Relevant answer
Answer
Based on my experience, doing this through Mathematica is pretty straightforward. You need to use the "VariationalMethods`" package. Check the following link for details.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
I have to clone a 1920 bp insert cut with NheI and HIndIII into my 7767bp vector cut with the same enzymes. Protocol used:
1. I cut 5 ug of insert vector and 2 ug of destination vector and gel purified it.
2. Performed ligation at 1:1, 1:3 and 1:5 ratios as a 10 ul reaction using T4 ligase from NEB at 16 C overnight.
3. Transformed 5 ul of ligation mix into NEB5 alpha, XL-10 Gold ultracompetent and Thermo DH5alpha competent cells according to manufacture's protocol and plated on LB +Amp plates with incubation overnight.
All reagents are new. However, I don't see any colonies after transformation. My gel picture shows that ligation has occurred I think. Lane 5, 6 and 7 are ligation products at 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5 ratios respectively. Lane 3 is cut insert and lane 10 is cut destination vector.
What could be going wrong?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for the information. Sounds like you have a problem with the ligation reaction itself.
Here are a few things you might want to try different (and what I have always done with success):
1. Perform the ligation at RT O/N.
2. Cut the amounts of vector/insert way back - use 1ng of vector and then adjust your vector ratios based on that.
3. Increase you ratios to 1:40, 1:50, 1:60 - never found the 1:1, 1:3, 1:5 ratios to work consistently.
4. Use 1ul for transformation.
5. Resuspend transformed cells in 250ul SOC and after incubation plate the entire amount.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
How can I seed 0.5x10^6 cells per well in a 96-well plate (I only need to seed 5 wells)?
I have a T25 flask (5 mL total volume) with a cell density of 0.6x10^6 cells/mL.
Relevant answer
Answer
To seed 0.5x10^6 cells per well in a 96-well plate (but only 5 wells) and considering you have a T25 flask with a cell density of 0.6x10^6 cells/mL, you can follow these steps:
1. Calculate Total Cells Needed:
0.5×10^6 cells per well x 5 wells = 2.5×10^6 total cells needed.
2. Calculate Volume of Cells Needed:
(2.5×10^6 cells): (0.6 ×10^6 cells/mL)=4.17mL
This is the total volume of the cell suspension needed to get the required number of cells.
3. Prepare Cell Suspension:
Take the cell suspension, centrifugate at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes and remove the supernatant of the existing media (to make space for the cell suspension).
4. Add Fresh Media:
Add 4,17 mL of fresh media to the cells pellet and gently mix the cells to ensure a homogeneous cell suspension.
6. Transfer to 96-Well Plate:
Dispense 0.83 mL (830 μL) of the cell suspension into each of the 5 wells in the 96-well plate.
7. Incubation:
Place the 96-well plate in the incubator for cell attachment and growth.
Ensure that you maintain proper sterile techniques throughout the process to avoid contamination. Additionally, be mindful of the timing and conditions required for the specific cell type you are working with.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
I ran an ELISA but point 5 of 7 on the standard curve has a CV of 28%. The other points on the curve all have a CV less than 10%. Because I am using human bio-banked samples I don't have enough to re-run the whole kit. Rather than losing all of these data points I am wondering if anyone has experience removing a data point from a standard curve or using data from a plate which has one high CV. Looking for suggestions and help if anyone has any similar experience.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Corinne,
I am having a similar issue. I wonder, what was your conclusion for this situation?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
I am plating 1 million mouse spleen cells in 96-well plates. In different wells, I am adding different proteins at a concentration of 1 ug/well to try to stimulate T-cell activity. I will then incubate the spleen cells + protein for 72 hours in standard conditions (37C, 5% CO2). At the end of the 72h incubation, I plan to collect supernatant for downstream cytokine analysis. What 96-well plate bottom shape is best for this application?
I have previously performed this experiment in V-bottom wells because I needed to centrifuge them at the end and separate cells from supernatant. However, I am concerned that the V-bottom wells didn't provide enough surface area for the protein to interact with the spleen cells, since the spleen cells pelleted on the bottom after some time. Perhaps I should have incubated the cells and protein in flat bottom wells and then transferred them to v-bottoms right before centrifugation. Additionally, during the 72h incubation period, would it be beneficial to mix the cells and proteins with a multichannel one or more times, just to increase cell and protein interaction?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Gage,
For your application, you will need to consider the growth support topography and growth culture conditions in terms of surface area and volume of culture medium available to the cultured cells.
The V-bottom wells are not ideal for your application because as you mentioned, it will not provide enough surface area for the protein to interact with the spleen cells, since the cells will settle at the bottom after some time and cell activity will be significantly lowered. Moreover, in V-bottom wells, the cell morphology will also be affected as cells will appear to aggregate in the centre of the well. This is more relevant if cells are adherent in nature.
I agree to what you mentioned regarding
incubating the cells and protein in flat bottom wells and then transferring them to V-bottom wells right before centrifugation.
During the 72h incubation period, do not mix the cells and proteins with a multichannel one or more times because this action of yours will disturb the interaction between the cells and the environment, and you will be doing more harm than good. Cell and protein interaction will occur within the wells due to the Brownian motion of protein molecules. You need not worry about that.
The article attached below will be helpful!
Best.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
I'm trying to seprate amino acids using silica gel.When I spray ninhydrin solution on silica gel it get disturbed.Can anyone tell me how to observe separated amino acid on silica gel plate?
Relevant answer
Answer
amino acids are polar molecules i think you need to change stationary phase to C8 or C18 of your plates
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Dear scientists,
I have encountered a problem where my bacteria (Staphylococcus Epidermidis) grow perfectly fine in liquid media (Tryptic soy broth) but not on agar plates (freshly prepared TSB plates). For the TSB plates that did grow bacteria, often only one small corner grew but not other parts although I streaked all over the plate using a glycerol stock (image1). I also plated the diluted bacteria solution from a liquid culture (OD was about 0.06) on the plates yet nothing grew (image 2). When I used the bacteria that did grow on the plates to streak another agar plate (TSB), they did grow but the middle of the plate didn’t grow anything (image 5). However, when I used a 6 month old LB agar plate for streaking, the bacteria grew perfectly fine (image 3). In addition, I also used an E. Coli liquid culture to streak a TSB plate, and they grew perfectly fine (image 4). I don't understand why my bacteria have problem growing on TSB agar plates but can grow in liquid TSB media. TSB media is recommended by ATCC for the growth of S. Epidermidis. This problem has halted all of my CFU experiments as the bacteria don't grow on agar plates. Would you be able to give me any suggestions why this is happening? Your time and help are strongly appreciated!
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you so much for answering my question! The recipe for TSB media is 15 g/ 500 ml of water (suggested by sigma), and that for TSB plates is 6 g of TSB + 3 g of agarose in 200 ml of water. The agar concentration is 1.5%, and the TSB concentration is the same for TSB broth and plates. The only thing I am worried about when making the plates is that I didn't put the agar flask into a 56 oC water bath after autoclaving to lower the temperature. But I will definitely make a new batch of TSB plates and try again!
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I need some suggestions on working with the drug 5-fluoroindole. I am working on green microalgae and trying to make my strain tryptophan auxotroph. However, I am unable to make proper drug plates as the desired drug concentration is extremely low, hence difficult to measure. Secondly, 5-FI being light sensitive, it takes longer for the colonies to be visible if there are any since I need to keep the plates away from light.
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
  1. Preparation of 5-Fluoroindole Stock Solution:Utilize amber glassware or aluminum foil to shield the drug from light exposure during preparation. Dissolve 5-fluoroindole in a suitable solvent known to enhance solubility (e.g., dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) at a concentration exceeding its solubility limit. Employ gentle heating or sonication if necessary to facilitate dissolution. Exercise caution to prevent excessive exposure to heat, which may degrade the compound. Filter the solution through a sterile filter (e.g., 0.2 μm pore size) to remove particulate matter and ensure sterility. Store the stock solution in opaque vials or wrapped in aluminum foil at a temperature conducive to stability (-20°C is recommended).
  2. Preparation of Agar Medium:Select a suitable agar-based medium compatible with the growth requirements of the target microorganism or experimental system. Common choices include nutrient agar or Sabouraud agar for bacterial and fungal cultures, respectively. Follow standard protocols for the preparation of agar medium, incorporating appropriate nutrients and pH adjustments as per experimental requirements. Ensure that the agar medium is free from contaminants and adequately sterilized through autoclaving or filtration.
  3. Incorporation of 5-Fluoroindole into Agar Plates:Under subdued light conditions, aseptically dispense the desired volume of the 5-fluoroindole stock solution into the molten agar medium at a predetermined concentration, considering the desired final concentration and solubility limitations. Thoroughly mix the agar medium to ensure uniform dispersion of 5-fluoroindole throughout the medium while minimizing exposure to ambient light. Pour the agar medium containing 5-fluoroindole into sterile petri dishes, ensuring even distribution and adequate solidification. Seal the plates with parafilm or aluminum foil to further shield the drug from light.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
I am developing a numerical model that optimizes the placement of ribs or stiffeners on a base rectangular plate. For the base plate, we use shell elements, while the ribs or stiffeners are modeled with beam or wire elements. To connect these components, we employ a tie constraint. The load applied to the plate is hydrostatic. To validate our model, we initially conducted an experiment on a plate without ribs and then compared the results with the numerical predictions. For the non-ribbed plate, the numerical analysis yielded a deflection of 4.56 mm, while the experimental result was 5.5 mm as shown in below Figure. When we applied the same load, boundary conditions, and material properties to the ribbed plate, we observed a significant discrepancy between the experimental and numerical results. Numerically, the deflection was 0.9 mm, but experimentally, it measured 8.7 mm as shown in below Figure. For better understanding of the connection between ribs and plate, I have uploaded a picture of 3D printing plate with ribs.
My question is this result difference is due to tie-constraint or any thing else?
Relevant answer
Answer
Zuffain Hussan Can you share your Abaqus model (.inp)?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
Hello everyone
I am trying to design an MTT experiment for an immortal adherent cell line with doubling time of 20 hours. The goal is to evaluate effects of certain growth factors and their combination on cell proliferation and determine the optimal dose.
Many papers suggested seeding 10000 cells in 96 well plates and performing MTT at 24 h intervals or at days 1, 3, 7.
I am not sure about some technical issues:
1. should I proceed with 24 h interval assay and for how many days? or the 1, 3, 7 days evaluation is good enough?
2. can I seed 5000 cells/ well in 96 well plates instead of 10000?
3. I expect my cells to become confluent after 72 hours (starting from 10000 cells), and they definitely die without medium change, so should I change the medium every 24 hours for all plates? or just change the medium after 72 hours and wouldn't this affect my results?
Thanks a lot!
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you very much
I learned a lot
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Dealing with the renolds number,mainly for plate type heat exchangers
Relevant answer
Answer
In plate heat exchangers, the heat is transferred between two fluids though a conductive plate. There, convection and conduction are the heat transfer processes between the fluid and the plate, and conduction is the process through the plate itself. Since convection is much more efficient when the flow is turbulent, high Reynolds numbers (>4000) are looked for.
The same is needed in heat pump heat exchangers, since the heat is transferred from the hot fluid to the heat pump gas through the walls of tubes.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I'm attempting to stain cancer cells in suspension from a 12-well plate for my research project. Could anyone provide guidance on the most effective staining protocols and techniques for ensuring accurate and reliable results? Any insights or recommendations on suitable staining dyes, concentrations, fixation methods, and imaging procedures would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance!
Relevant answer
Answer
What do you intend to stain: cell surface markers, an intercellular protein, organelles, nuclei, nucleoli, ... ? Without knowing any details of your experimental set-up it is impossible to give you any advice; do some research on your own and then ask such more specific questions.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
6 answers
I am conducting a sequential heat transfer-stress analysis for a composite wall consisting of steel plates and a concrete core, similar to concrete-filled tubes or CFTs. My analysis involves heating the wall from one of its faces using a heat transfer analysis, which runs smoothly. However, when I perform the stress analysis by inputting the results from the previous analysis, the program fails to converge after a certain amount of computation time. This is because the steel expands more than the concrete core, leading to interaction problems in the program. This issue does not occur when the temperature is applied simultaneously on all faces. Due to the deformations resulting from being exposed on only one face, the core penetrates the steel plates. How can I prevent this from happening, disregarding the fact that I already have a hard contact between both surfaces?
Relevant answer
Answer
Denis Benasciutti That only applies to steel bars in reinforced concrete; in this type of structure, the shear load at the interface is transmitted through friction, which is somewhat lesser, and through shear studs. Additionally, I need the plates to detach from the concrete when they buckle, so I cannot perform an analysis with rigid node-to-node contact, which forces me to use surface-to-surface or general contact.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I dissociated EBs and replated hiPS-CM into a monolayer in a fibronectin coated plates. I had some cells in 96-well plate and others in a 12-well plate. After 24 hrs., cells became adherent and started to contract. However, after 48 hrs., I noticed cells in the 96-well plate started to detach, whereas the cells in 12-well plate were intact. What could be the reason for cells detachment? and how can I avoid this in the future?
Relevant answer
Answer
The detachment of cells after replating into a monolayer can occur due to various reasons, including:
  1. Inadequate cell adhesion: Despite using fibronectin-coated plates, there might be variations in the quality or quantity of coating between the 96-well plate and the 12-well plate. Insufficient coating or uneven distribution of fibronectin can lead to poor cell adhesion in the 96-well plate, resulting in cell detachment.
  2. Variability in cell density: The cell density at the time of replating can influence cell adhesion and survival. Cells plated at higher densities may experience increased competition for nutrients and space, leading to detachment. Ensure consistent and appropriate cell density across all plates to minimize variability.
  3. Differences in culture conditions: Environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and CO2 levels can vary between different culture vessels, potentially affecting cell behavior. Make sure to maintain consistent culture conditions across all plates to minimize discrepancies.
  4. Handling and manipulation: Variations in handling and manipulation techniques during replating can impact cell viability and adhesion. Ensure gentle handling and consistent methodology when transferring cells to different plates to minimize stress and damage.
To avoid cell detachment in the future, consider the following strategies:
  1. Standardize coating procedures: Ensure consistent and thorough coating of culture plates with fibronectin to promote uniform cell adhesion. Optimize coating conditions such as concentration, incubation time, and temperature to achieve optimal results.
  2. Maintain consistent cell density: Determine an optimal cell density for replating based on previous experience and experimental requirements. Avoid overcrowding or under-seeding cells to prevent competition-induced detachment.
  3. Monitor culture conditions: Regularly monitor and maintain consistent culture conditions, including temperature, humidity, and CO2 levels, to create a stable environment conducive to cell attachment and growth.
  4. Standardize handling procedures: Establish standardized protocols for cell handling and replating to minimize variability and ensure reproducibility. Train personnel to follow these protocols consistently to maintain experimental consistency.
By implementing these strategies and optimizing experimental conditions, you can minimize the risk of cell detachment and improve the reproducibility of your experiments. Additionally, troubleshooting specific issues encountered during cell culture can help identify and address underlying factors contributing to cell detachment.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I want to determine the melt strength of a molten polymer. We only have parallel plate rheometer to determine the rheology. Is it possible to measure the melt strength through rheometer and is there any relation between melt elasticity and melt strength
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Vinay,
You can measure the melt Temperature (Tm) together with the glass Temperature (Tg) as well as the G'/E' G"/E" and Tang (delta) of polymers with a Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) and Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC). The measurement of these parameters should tell you pretty much everything about the rheological properties. DMA more accurate measurements but is more expensive.
I have done tests longtime ago as a part of my Masters thesis but the principal is the same.
Below is an article I have found that described how these measurements are done as well as the explanations of the results. You may also take a look at the references the publishers have cited.
Ignace
Pharmaceutics. 2010 Jun; 2(2): 78–90.
Published online 2010 Mar 24. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics2020078
PMCID: PMC3986708
PMID: 27721344
Assessment of Thermal Transitions by Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) Using a Novel Disposable Powder Holder
Mohamad G. Abiad,1,† Osvaldo H. Campanella,1 and M. Teresa Carvajal2,*
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
Go to:
Abstract
Foods and pharmaceuticals materials are exposed to various environmental conditions during processing and while in storage; therefore, stability and quality are key attributes of concern. The properties of foods and pharmaceutical materials that define their quality are affected by conditions such as temperature, humidity and time. Glass transition is considered a key material property to understand how these external conditions affect the stability and quality of foods and pharmaceuticals. Thus, investigating the thermo-mechanical properties of these materials as well as characterizing the glass transition temperature have a great interest not only in the food industry, but also extend to the pharmaceutical and polymer industries. The aim of this study was to design and test a new disposable powder holder that allows the use of a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) instrument to test and characterize loose powder samples. The disposable aluminum powder holder was designed and constructed to be used in the single cantilever configuration on a TA Instruments RSA III DMA. Three different powder samples – Felodipine, polyethylene-oxide (MW 900 kDa) and HPMC (E4M) – were used for validation. The use of this powder holder allows the detection of different thermal changes of powder samples without compacting and when large sample size is necessary for detection and/or interpretations
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I have been trying to grow Rosetta 2 Cells transformed with Tri-Ex4 DHX36 plasmid in 600 mL culture. I transform the Rosetta 2 competent cells and plate them selected with Chloramphenicol 35ug/mL and Ampicillin 50ug/mL. The cells transform but give me two different size colonies after 24 HR incubation at 37C. One is slightly larger but few in number, and the smaller ones are more in number. I take both types of colonies and grow them separately in a 3 mL LB starter culture with the same antibiotics overnight. The next day, I tried to grow them in a larger 600 mL culture with the same antibiotics to grow them to 0.6 OD for IPTG induction for protein expression. However, even with a 1:1000 transfer (600 uL of starter culture in 600 mL LB media) or dumping the whole 3 mL culture in 600 mL, it shows almost no growth in 6 hours. If I end up leaving it overnight, the cells grow and saturate the media, and at that point, I have no way of doing IPTG induction. (Sometimes, I start to get OD 0.1 after 6 hours of incubation.)
Relevant answer
Answer
The fact you have 2 sizes of colonies is not good, I would use 100ug/mL Amp on your plates to increase selectivity for your key plasmid, this should eliminate the differing sizes.
Have you considered using autoinduction method with Terrific Broth, Studier F.W. et.al.
This is a super rich media that can get 14 OD600 cultures, when used in baffled flasks, when the glucose runs out as a food source then lactose becomes available once the cells are at a good OD and induction kicks in.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Hello,
I’m trying to differentiate SH-SY5Y cells, at two different seeding densities. 2500 cells/well and 5000 cells/well.
Due to budget constraints I’m differentiating using retinoic acid only, however I cant find any literature that explains how much RA to add to each well.
I’ll be treating 48 wells with RA and comparing to the other cells with no treatment, and I have less than 100uL of 10uM RA in an eppindorf tube. I feel a bit stupid but I can’t seem to work out how much RA to add to each well, and if I need to dilute with DMEM?
Each well contains DMEM with 10% FBS which I’ll be reducing to 1% FBS along with the RA.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Kelly Smith,
For differentiation of SH-SY5Y cells, usually 10μM all-trans retinoic acid (RA) is used namely, DMEM containing 1% FBS + 10μM (RA) for 72 hours to induce differentiation.
You have 10μM RA which upon addition to each well will get further diluted in DMEM + 1% FBS. You need to have a stock solution of a higher concentration. So you prepare a fresh stock solution of RA (say 5mM) and use the below formula
C1V1= C2V2
Where
C1 = concentration of stock solution 5mM
V1= volume of stock solution required (say X)
C2= working concentration (10μM)
V2= volume needed for the experiment (50 wells x 100ul) i.e.,5000ul if you use 100ul per well.
5000μM x X =10μM x 5000ul
X = 10ul
You may add 10ul of 5mM stock RA to 4.990ml of media (DMEM + 1% FBS) to give 5ml of media which you could use for differentiation by adding 100ul per well in 48 wells.
I have attached an article below which may be helpful.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I seeded 5e6 and 3e6 SW756 cells in two 15cm dishes with equal amounts of media on Thursday, anticipating one to be confluent Monday/Tuesday, and the other to be confluent sometime later, maybe Thursday. This is my first time testing with these, so it was just a rough guess.
However, on Monday, both were equal confluency - I could not have told a difference in plates if they weren't labelled. Is this normal? Should I give less media to the 3e6 plate to get the anticipated effect, or just plate less cells next time?
Just overall curious what factors play a role in cell growth, as the 3e6 plate grew at a much faster rate with the same conditions - aside from having a higher proportion of fresh media.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Ethan,
As per the information provided by you, there could be two possiblities.
1. You may have wrongly counted the cells while plating, or
2. You may have wrongly concluded the confluency state of cells.
I would infer that 15cm dish with 5e6 seeding density may have become overconfluent on Monday because of which there is lack of space for cells to grow further as well as the media may have been depleted of nutrients.
On the other hand, the 15cm dish with 3e6 seeding density may have almost reached confluency with some space left for cells to grow besides the media still being fresh and nutrient- rich.
I would suggest you plate less cells this thursday (say 3e6 so that it reaches 80-90% confluency after 4 days i.e., Monday/Tuesday and 1.5e6 cells so that it reaches near confluency at one/two days later i.e., Wednesday/Thursday) with the SAME amount of media in both the 15cm dishes.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
As i tried to grow vibrio using LB agar media, and the whole lawn of vibrio was there after the incubation of 12 hrs at 37 degree. And the colonies were overlapping. Suggest the way to get clear colonies on the plates.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you are trying to isolate colonies on the plate it appears that your original inoculum has too high of a density. Dilute it in half, and then half again, and maybe again and then do your pour plate or streak for isolation so that you can get isolated colonies for your pure cultures.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
I did a Gibson assembly reaction and consequently, I did the transformation with my construct to E. coli DH5alpha and I plated the bacteria into 20 µg/mL Kanamycin agar plates. The first time the colony PCR result was successful, however, last week I did another colony PCR with the same colonies that I chose (which I had frozen to make the backup), and this shows primers dimers. Idk what's going on, do you have some ideas about it? My positive control was effective and showed the respective band in the gel.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you still get the right size bend (showing that your plasmid is in) I would not worry about primer dimers
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
I'm doing mic and mbc following the disc diffusion assay. I want to calculate the cfu value for the microbial growth in the plate. Can you please share any relevant article or the exact calculation?
Relevant answer
Answer
Your enumeration of microbes as Colony Forming Unit ( CFU), you should be very perfect what type of microbes you are dealing with. Accordingly you should proceed serial dilution pour plate or spread plate technique. For instance, if you are dealing with bacteria, your accurate dilution will be 10‐⁴, 10-⁵ and 10-⁶ . Suppose you get 30 colonies in 10-⁵ by inoculating 0.1 ml, Then your CFU will be average count x dilution factor and find out as CFU per ml or per gram as follows: 30 x 10⁵= 3x 10⁶ for 0.1 ml So CFU per ml will be 3 x 10⁷. It is better to express as log value. Your answer is 7. 477. Why log value? Because exponential growth of bacteria is always in log phase. If you deal with Actinobacteria , go one step lower dilution I.e., your sampling will be 19³, 19⁴ and 10⁵ ( because Actinobacterial population is less than bacteria in normal soil). Similarly, when you deal with fungi, choose the dilution 19², 19³ and 10⁴. Hope, I could clear your doubt.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
Hi,
I'm facing a recurent problem with the cloning of a given cDNA. Everytime I'm doing the cloning I end up with a mix of big and small colonies on the insert+vector plate while getting only few big ones on the vector alone plate. The small ones are clearly not satellites, I know how do they look. I picked some of the small one but they are generally not growing in liquid. Tried to grow plates at 30°C no changes. Ran my ligation on gels and they look very efficient. I clearly don't know what to do. Any suggestions? Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Can you please tell me how much of transformed cells you are spreading onto the plate
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Hi all,
Hope you are having a nice day! I was wondering if anyone has used the bac-to-bac baculovirus expression kit to express recombinant protein? There is a step when creating the virus, where you transform a shuttle vector into DH10bac competent cells which contain a bacmid. This recombines with the shuttle vector to introduce your gene of interest into the bacmid, which you then isolate. I have followed this procedure using the manufacturer's specifications, and do get colonies. When I screen my control (uses a control vector sent with kit), the recombination did occur, but did not occur with my gene. I picked six colonies from each. The control vector has an insert which is a similar size to my insert. You select with gentamicin (shuttle vector encodes resistance), tetracycline (helper plasmid which contains genes that help facilitate the recombination event), and kanamycin (bacmid has resistance gene). Blue/white selection with bluo-gal and IPTG is supposed to select for recombination, colonies with recombinant bacmid should be white, not blue. I bought new bluo gal for my plates, so definitely should be good, and am getting many colonies on my plate but none are blue (which again would be negative.) However, when I screen them, they contained unrecombined bacmid. I have just picked 20 colonies off of the plate and am screening with colony PCR. My next ideas if I don't get anything from that are to up the bluo gal, up the IPTG, and troubleshoot/ use more of my shuttle vector in case actual transformation is the problem (kit has me using 1 ng which to me, seems low for this application.) The cells are expensive however, and I don't know much about optimizing recombination/ratios, etc. Does anyone have any suggestions? Sorry for any incorrect terminology or statements, I am completely new to this system. Also, I have attached a schematic of the system from the manual in case this helps.
Thanks,
Claire
Also, sizes:
Shuttle vector + my gene: approx 8 kb
Bacmid: 135 kb
Relevant answer
Answer
One easy attempt would be to reattempt just as you described but make sure your antibiotic selection reagents are new. Kan and G418 can break down over time. If you still have your transformed bacteria vial, just spread that on the new plates to not waste anything.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
I did the MTT assay twice. The first time, the absorbance values was inconsistent among the wells. The second time, the values was somehow close to each other, but still different. Do you have any useful recommendations?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Hey Alaa A. Rashwan , I think u should think about the following:
1. Cell singularity: make sure when u trypsinize the cells, they become single. and if u centrifuge afterwards, make sure when u reconstitute in media, u pipette properly to ensure the cells are single again. Having cell clumps (>3 cells) might cause this difference
- P.S. avoid aggressive pipetting as it might shear the cell membrane and decrease cell viability
2. Cell Seeding: make sure u seed the same number of cells in each well. i.e. u have proper pipetting techniques. aspirating extra or less volume might contribute to such differences.
3. Cell Detachment: when u add drugs/PBS/MTT to the wells, make sure the pipette touches the wall and don't release the liquid in the center of the well as this might was away some cells.
4. Media aspiration: if u r using an aspirator to remove the media, make sure u don't aspirate the cells as well by doing the following:
a. decrease the pump pressure to be the least.
b. don't touch the bottom of the well. this would increase the chance of cell aspiration
c. monitor ur aspiration technique by checking the wells before and after the aspiration
Hope this helps.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
I have been working with HepG2 cells for some time with no problem. The past couple months when I've been plating into 96 well plate for experiments I am noticing the cells are not healthy or growing. The same cell line in the T-75 flask are growing well. Pictured are the cells in the T-75 compared to the 96 wells. From the same cell line, plated the same day. What could be going wrong?
Relevant answer
Answer
I met the same problem! Have you figured this out?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
6 answers
I'm facing a puzzling question. I stained two different cell lines of the same type and observed DAPI dots in the cytoplasm of one, unlike the typical DAPI pattern in the other (see images). Both were untreated and on the same plate, subjected to similar treatment.
Has anyone encountered a similar issue? Any hypothesis of what can it be? We have done mutiple mycoplasma testing by PCR and turned out negative. Also, if contamination is present and the cells share the same plate, shouldn't the contamination transfer between them?
thank you very much for your help
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello.
Your cell culture probably infected by mycoplasm.
Read about cell line contamination by mycoplasm
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Hello,
I would like to ask a question. I want to do PCR from a large amount of sample, but it does not fit on my plate. This means that in order to test them all, I have to put them on more plates, which means doing at least two PCR runs. Then I would like to compare each sample with each other. My question is. Is it necessary to have a housekeeping gene in every PCR run? Or it is enough to have it only in the first run and relate the samples from other PCR runs to this housekeeping gene.
Thank you for answer.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes it is necessary to include a housekeeping gene for each plate, and calculate expression values based on that. Cannot extrapolate values for housekeeping genes as each PCR run is different due to small pipetting errors, machine readings, reagent thaw/freeze cycles etc
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
The dead and alive C.elegans is mixed on one NGM plate, how can I separate alive one from dead one in a very rapid way?
Besides , those living C.elegans has very low athletic ability.
Relevant answer
Answer
To quickly distinguish between live and dead C. elegans on a mixed NGM plate, you can use a technique called "gentle touch." Live worms will respond to touch by moving, while dead ones will remain motionless. Gently touch the worms with a platinum wire or an eyelash pick, and observe their response to identify the live individuals.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
I am trying cloning of my gene of interest in pet28a vector and trying to transform it in DH5a. But after transformation I got this type of plate. Can anyone tell me what is the problem here?
Relevant answer
Answer
Are you trying to express your protein of interest? In that case, you might need to use BL21 or some other expression vectors. DH5a in not a protein expression vector, so your pET28a containing the gene of interest might not get expressed, thus everything is growing on the plates!
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I am looking for an alternative to analye my qPCR results as qBase+ is not available anymore since the compagny was bought by CellCarta. I use 2-3 reference genes to normalize my results. I work with 96- or 384-well plates.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, I found out, that they offer qBase+ for free https://cellcarta.com/genomic-data-analysis/, how did you solve your problem?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
6 answers
I'm doing a protocol in which I plate my cells in a 12-well plate with complete medium (i.e. DMEM/F-12 WITH 5% FBS), let them reach ~80% confluency and then I change the complete medium for a starving medium, containing only 0.5% of FBS. Right after I change, some of the cells suffered from alteration in their morphology. It didn't happen in all the wells, but in most of them. I took pictures from moments before and after changing the medium. This cell are EA.hy926, an immortalized endothelial cell.
What can cause this kind of alterations? It seams like the cells are shrinking, although I've never notice anything like that before in other protocols and other plates. Could it be incompatibility with cell plate i'm using (Corning).
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
IF the cells really are shrinking, they are probably sick and dying, and the starvation medium is insufficiently nutritious (containing only 0.5% of FBS-does this mean that the FBS is the only additive in this solution, or are there any other constituents?)
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
The cells are genetically engineered and grown on PDL plates for a potency assay. My BCA is highly variable. I am wondering if triton disrupts the PDL coating, which then interferes in the BCA leading to the variability observed. Can this variability be a result of triton releasing lysine from the plate coating?
Relevant answer
Answer
Non-ionic surfactant Triton X-100 can break down cell membranes to remove proteins and cause cell lysis. It breaks down hydrophobic connections to solubilize proteins and lipids. Bicicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay variability may be associated with Triton X-100's effect on PDL coating. Triton X-100 may interfere with the way proteins interact with one another, which could have an impact on how PDL binds to the plate. Try varying amounts, evaluate the stability of the PDL coating, run control tests, and think about other cell lysis techniques to learn more about this. To find the cause of the assay's variability, it is essential to troubleshoot and validate each step.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
The cells are genetically engineered and grown on PDL plates for a potency assay. My BCA is highly variable. I am wondering if triton disrupts the PDL coating, which then interferes in the BCA leading to the variability observed.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Dr. Deepika Jain
Triton X-100 will not disrupt the PDL coating. Triton X-100 is a non-ionic detergent used to denature cell membranes. It does not denature protein. It is considered as a mild surfactant as it breaks protein-lipid, lipid-lipid but not protein-protein interactions.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
Hey, I am currently doing my thesis and I am working with skin cells to detect a specific biomarker. I want to look for a biomarker in my collected media after treating them with 4 different treatments. However, my supervisor said that we would run them undiluted and diluted. So, how would I approach that ? Should I run a plate with undiluted samples and another plate where all samples are 1:2 diluted? So, for each sample should I add 100ul of the supernatant with 100ul of new fresh media to obtain this dilution and then run both plates to see if the concentration of my biomarker is detectable on the standard curve.
Please I need a full answer and some explanations.
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
If you have enough wells, you may run both the undiluted as well as the diluted samples (1:2) in the same 96-well plate. I would suggest you also include one more dilution (1:4) in the run.
Run the standards as well as the samples (both undiluted and diluted) in triplicates. In case the wells are not sufficient, you may use another 96-well plate. Sample volumes are usually between 50-100μl; however, this can vary from assay to assay. I suggest you use 100ul of undiluted sample and for the diluted sample (1:2), add 50ul of the supernatant to 50ul of fresh media. Samples that generate values which are higher than the highest standard need to be repeated using a higher dilution factor.
Note that sample values should fall within the assay’s dynamic range. Values outside the range of the standard curve are usually non-linear, and because of this property it is not possible to extrapolate a value correctly using this curve.
You may also note that a standard curve should be run for every plate which means each plate should have a standard curve. If you cannot afford to run the standard curve for every plate because of limited supply or cost, at least you should run one standard curve with each set of plates for that day. If you are using serum-containing medium, it is necessary that you run an uncultured medium blank to obtain the baseline signals which can then be subtracted from the cultured media sample data.
Good Luck!
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Design a brazed plate heat exchanger for given fluids
Liquid hydrogen -20 kelvin and at 6 bar coverts to gas
Neon -100 kelvin and at 1 bar coverts to liquid
Q=200KW
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
I am using a pET28B vector to clone my 2.1kb insert digested with BamH1 (fwd) and Xho1 (rev) restriction enzymes. I'm using over 1ug of DNA for restriction digestion, kept at 37°C for over 3 hours. For cohesive end ligation, I'm using Promega T4 ligase, and keeping the setup (3:1, 5:1 and 7:1; insert: vector) for 16 hours before transforming in Dh5alpha competent cells followed by plating on Kan plates. I've been doing this for quite sometime now. But everytime, all I get are false colonies. I've tried to troubleshoot every single step but to no avail. My ligase is also new.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Aniket Banerjee i agree with several points from Mariana. The key points that can go wrong is that not both enzymes cut efficiently, the Ligase is not efficient, or (less likely) your transformation efficiency is low. When you say false colonies, are they the empty pET28B? The things to make sure are: A) is your vector cut by both enzymes? check that u are using a good buffer for both enzymes (see company webpages tools, e.g. Thermo double digest calculator), and add a bit more of the enzyme with less efficiency. You can make a control with no, 1, the other, and 2 enzymes and run on the gel together to double check that they both work. Cut and purify always from the gel. You can include dephosphorylation of the digested vector directly after digestion before running the gel to keep any remaining vector that is only cut by one enzyme from religating. B) is your insert cut well? Are you cutting out of a backbone and can see well that both ends are cut or are you digesting a PCR product? restriction sites close to the ends are less efficiently cut (eg. check here https://www.neb.com/en/tools-and-resources/usage-guidelines/cleavage-close-to-the-end-of-dna-fragments). Subcloning the PCR fragment first can help in that case. Also purify the digested insert via gel of course. For the Ligation, the concentrations should be verified by running an aliquot on gel (nanodrop especially low values are sometimes not so accurate). 2:1 or 3:1 is ok, more is not helpful i think. For Ligase u can also make a control with a singe enzyme digested not dephosphorylated vector. Finally, check that transformation efficiency is decent. Low efficiency makes it harder to get larger plasmids. Good luck.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I want to simulate lamb wave propagation in 3D thin cracked plate using transient analysis in ansys apdl. I have selected some nodes to apply time dependent loading function.There is not any error. but after solution I can not see propagation of wave and loading only affect on the selected nodes not the whole plate. can anyone help me.thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
Kindly understand that the other well known name of Lamb wave is "Plate wave". This means that two Rayleigh waves are generated at the two sides of the plate simultaneously and they they travel without any interference first. Accordingly, plate thickness is being taken care of first to generate symmetrical mode Lamb waves. Then if the plate thickness is getting reduced then one can produce asymmetrical Lamb waves. Rayleigh wave wavelength, its frequency, plate thickness, material attenuation, etc. are the important considerations...
Kindly refer Symmetric and Asymmetric Lamb waves in the Google search...
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
5 answers
Using the same probe and on the same PCR plate, both abnormal Taqman qPCR multicomponent plot normal Taqman qPCR multicomponent plot were observed. The only difference between the two is the template. Then what is the problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi did you happen to figure out what caused that abnormal reaction?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
hello sir
i am doing simulation of on PU foam same as literature. I am considering PU foam block and bottom is fixed and top rigid plate striking with velocity. I am using material modal MAT_083 in LS DYNA.
this model is based on strain rate dependent. so when i applying the velocity on plate and plate is striking so block showing unrealistic very large deformation and some time not compressing as i want. and in message file showing negative volume error. please tell me what should i do. and i already done lots of changes. but problem is same.
Relevant answer
Answer
I run your k file successfully! Version : smp d F14
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
I am modeling a masonry wall in LS DYNA, which has multiple interfaces in between. To simulate the interface between blocks I use the TieBreak contact, which requires normal and tangential strengths and stiffnesses. The normal properties are defined to model the tensile behavior, however, I do not know how to assign a compressive behavior for this contact.
For instance, I modeled two steel plates with TieBreak contact in between, when I applied compressive force on the upper plate it started to penetrate the lower plate, which is not reasonable.
How can I avoid penetration in this contact?
Relevant answer
Answer
Try setting soft=1 in the contact definition
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
It was easy to find the equation of indentation from Hertz contact theory when a sphere and a flat surface are indenting or 2 spheres are indenting, from Hertz contact theory. However, currently, I am indenting a cylindrical-shaped fibre with a flat plate indenter (so it's a flat-cylindrical contact). I saw the equation of contact area but I did not see the equation for contact depth. Can you please give me with some references?
Relevant answer
Answer
Contact between a rigid cylinder with flat end and an elastic half-space. Also there is a reference:
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
I did lawn on an E. coli strain onto a plate of Mueller-Hinton agar. For other plates I got clear zones of inhibition, but for few particular antibiotics (CRO, OFX and CIP) against this strain some colony growth is observed. So is this strain resistant against these antibiotics?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you very much @Micheal. I will ignore the colonies and measure the initial zone of inhibition.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
I am modeling the Kirchhoff plate through FEM. I have already used the Q4 element.
However, I want to use the Q8 element. Is this possible? If yes, how many items should be in the approximate polynomial to derive the shape functions according to Pascal triangle?
Relevant answer
Answer
Many thanks for your response.
I do not think it is that easy, as for Kirchhoff plate there are three unknowns at every node ( transverse disp., and two rotations). The two rotations are the differentiation of the transverse displacement itself.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
I've been trying to isolate bacteriophages specific to soil bacteria (isolated from low, moderate and highly saline soils from research extension centers) for the last couple of months using the enrichment method followed by plaque assay. However, I'm always ending up with no plaques in my diluted plates (with complete lysis in the undiluted one). I'm keeping positive controls (w/o phages) and negative controls (media only). I'm using the following protocol:
  • O/N Incubation of soil samples with host bacteria (Bacillus toyonensis) in LBMC (2.5 mM MgSO4 and CaCl2 in final media) at 30 degree C, followed by centrifugation @ 4700 rpm for 20 mins, adding chloroform to supernatant, 5 mins incubation and 5 mins centrifugation @ 4700 rpm for 5 mins and flitering using a 0.22 micron filter.
  • Multiple rounds of enrichment (with chloroform sterilization and filtering) of the lysate with host until OD drops approx 10 times relative to +con. I also prepared another control by treating the +con with the same lysate collection treatment as with the one containing phages, since I was suspicious something in the media is killing my host before they can be infected by the phages. Interestingly, I found this control showing almost similar drop in OD relative to +con, although no phages were added here, thus confirming my suspicion.
  • Plaque assay with 8-10 ten-fold dilutions of the final lysate added to host in early stationary phase (OD=0.2-0.3), in 1.5% LBMC plates, 0.7% soft LBMC agar kept at 42 degrees (I also tried 0.3% and 0.2%), incubated at 30 degrees as well as 37 degrees O/N. No plaques in dilution plates, undiluted stock showing complete lysis. Tried keeping the plates for longer times as well (upto 5 days) with similar results.
In my understanding, some sort of endolysins/toxins might be getting enriched in the culture media and killing the hosts, thereby not letting the phages infect the bacteria and multiplying. I also tried using a second host (Serratia plymuthica) and ended up with the same results. I'm relatively new to this and I would really appreciate any help/thoughts/suggestions on how to troubleshoot this.
Relevant answer
Answer
How many dilutions did u make equal to plates inoculated?
and what are values of these dilutions?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
I've never seen anything other than bacteria and this doesn't look like anything I can find on Google! Is it fungus?? This is a plate of neurospheres if that helps.
Relevant answer
Answer
Could you please isolate and culture the organism on a growth medium so as to know the type of organism it is?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
7 answers
Hello everyone,
I want to know how many cells are in my glycerol stocks. They were all made in the same way, and they yield similar results, but I kind of forgot about one step or two before making them, which means that I don't know how many microorganisms there are "originally".
Would that be okay to simply unthaw couple of stocks, conduct a serial dilution (100 ul from a stock into 900 ul of saline solution) and just follow the steps similarly to SP-SDS or 6x6 method? Is there necessity of "bacterial activation", given that they will be incubated on agar plate anyways?
If there is a need of "bacterial activation" - What kind of method would be the best suitable, given that I don't want to use enormous numbers of plastic plates, agar powder and wanting to just be more less-waste?
Thanking for your answers in advance,
Matty
Relevant answer
Answer
Chidi Nduka Amadi-Ikpa Yup, I just did :)
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
6 answers
Hello!
I am investigating the extrudability of our bio-ink through rheology. Previously, I used a parallel plate to acquire the shear rate of the sample after which I tried an actual extrudability test with a 3D printing machine for viscoelastic material. I find it trivial at first to acquire the data with a parallel plate knowing that the pneumatic piston pushing the ink through the cartridge is closely conical in shape.
Would there be any significant difference at all if I choose to test it with a conical upper plate? We only have one rheometer at this moment so as much as possible I would not want to waste time.
I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on this. Thank you in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with your estimation of the appropriate gap as a three characteristic size of particles.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
10 answers
Yes = Accurate @Measurements #Weights ^Elementals *Plates %Feels (Tectonic: Shifts)
No = Shifts @Elementals #Weights ^Tectonic *Measurements %Accurate (Feels: Plates)
Key: Water
Note: Immigration
Commentary: Security
Relevant answer
Answer
the main thing being the main thing = capitalism relies on personal property ownership, which will mean exactly nothing when true emergencies overwhelm the architecture supporting it, which in America's case means' Mexico will invade (before or after the quakes) and with or without China's help, which would only happen if America tried to take over "their way of life" (e.g. Hong Kong or Taiwan), which America did to Russia (remember!), and look what happened ... don't mention Iraq or Afghanistan in this breath, right?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Hello,
I am performing gene study analysis. Due to the many genes, I can´t run all my samples in one plate. For this reason I am using an inter-run calibrator.
How do I fit the calibrator into the calculation for the expression?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Alison, did you solve your question? I'm trying to do the same thing and just found Jan M. Ruijter work to do it but seems complex. Thanks in advance,
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Hi, everyone!
I am a graduate student of pharmacology from China. I am trying to measure the plasma NETs level with anti-MPO antibody and Sytox Green, which are available in our lab. Here's how I did it.
Firstly, a high-binding 96-well plate were coated overnight at 4 ℃ with anti-MPO antibody(1 μg/mL, Thermo). The plate was washed 1 time with wash buffer, then blocked with 4% BSA in PBS supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20 for 1.5 hours at room temperature. The plate was washed 3 times again, then incubate with plasm (100 μL) for 2 hours at 37 ℃, 300 rpm. The plate was washed 5 times before incubating for 15 minutes with Sytox Green in dark (100 μL, 1:1000, Thermo). The fluorescence intensity (excitation at 485 nm and emission at 535 nm) was quantified.
But there was no difference in fluorescence intensity between plasma and negative controls. I'm not sure what went wrong. I hope anybody who did it can give me some advice. Thank you so much for your generous help!
Best wished!
Yafei, Fang
Relevant answer
Answer
There may be two explanations for this:
1) The concentration of Sytox green is too high (5mM diluted 1000 times = 5µM, which is a lot for this type of agent). It is preferable to work between 10-100nM to hope to see differences
2) Sytox green is a reagent which sticks to nucleic acid, it is impermeant to live cells. Therefore, this reagent also marks any cellular debris that is found in media, this will mask the differences between your different conditions. Flow cytometry makes it possible to overcome this signal which comes from cellular debris.
Below , please find a link for a paper describing the quantification of NETs by flow cytometry,
Best regards
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Hello dear researchers,
Do you know how to solve and prove the formula 5.27 (The Volume Expansion Coefficient for Low Solute Concentration) mentioned in the "diffusion mass transfer book" by Skelland? This formula is used in the section related to (distributions of velocity and concentrations in the laminar natural convection on a vertical plate) and is shown in the attached photo.
Regards,
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Dr. Ersin Sayar,
I am very grateful for your responsiveness. Yes, that is absolutely correct, this is the formula for the volume expansion coefficient. Do you know how this formula has been calculated? What were the steps of proving this formula from the initial assumptions to obtaining formula 5.27?
I sincerely appreciate your help and guidance.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
7 answers
Hi all,
I have been doing drug screening on clinical samples and multiple 384-well plates are used for each samples. However, when we look at the cell number in the DMSO control on each plate, there is a trend of decreasing number of cells from plate 1 to plate 5. There is no problem within the plate i.e. cell numbers are even in the same plate.
The way I do it is to use a Pipetboy, mix the cell solution a few times, and take 8 mL and put it in the reservoir. Then they were pipetted them using a electronic multichannel pipette which can dispense 4 columns of wells for each aspiration. I rocked the reservoir back and forth before each aspiration. After finishing one plate, I mix the cell solution thoroughly again and take another 6-8 mL of cells to the reservoir. The tips and reservoir I used are both from Integra.
This happens to both cell lines and primary samples, and it has been bothering me for a long time. Has anyone seen the same problem and has a solution for it?
Many thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Kent Fung I would speculate that rocking may actually be causing segregation in the sample between the larger or more dense cells. Other solution (not a bad pun!) is to integrate the values from all wells/plates and thus measure the entire 8 mL of sample. No sampling errors if all is measured...
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
2 answers
Hello,
I am new to working with human microvascular endothelial cells (bought from Sigma), and there is varying information on how many passages you can take these cells to and still get a reliable inflammatory response when stimulated. Does anyone have any experience on how these cells may change or how their inflammatory response may change with increased passaging?
And while I'm here, do these cells need a special treatment in the wells when plating (i.e., 12-well, 48-well plates)
Thanks for any help!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Shawn. I have worked with human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC) and their derived cell line HMEC-1 for the past two years. For the HDMEC my magic number is ten for consistent response to TNF 1-50 ng/mL in 6 to 24 hours. After 12 hours morphology changes are quite visible in bright field microscopy.
You are asking the right questions, microvascular Endothelial cells tends to be quite needy as well size increase. In my opinion they are sensible to edge effect. 96-48-24 are stable if you avoid edges. Expect some variance in the outer wells with 6-wells near the edge. Usually they do well with 0.2 ml/cm2 media. Cheers.
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
1 answer
Does an increment in the width of the magnet and electrode in the Riga plate affect the fluid flow behaviour in skin friction and heat transfer rate?
Relevant answer
Answer
Could you please re-word your question?
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
3 answers
I was doing transformation using plasmid with kanamycin resistance into BL21 DE3 E. coli cells with ampicillin resistance. I plated the culture on amp+kana plates and amp only plates. However, only colonies were found on the amp only plate. Since the transformation has fail several times before this, I decided to inoculate the colony from the amp only plate and continue the experiment (grow the culture to 0.55 OD600 and add IPTG). Afterwhich I ran a SDS-PAGE. I observed a difference between before IPTG and after, and the protein bands in the after IPTG lane corresponded to my protein of interest, which should not have been expressed... Does anyone have any knowledge about this? Please help.
Relevant answer
Answer
What is the source of the Ampicillin resistance?
But there are going to be a few different proteins expressed with IPTG induction one of which will be the T7 polymerase that may well have many metabolic consequences.
If your gene is only on the Kan plasmid then it likely is not really your protein being expressed but you can confirm by western blot as suggested by Jahaziel Gasperin Bulbarela
There should not be any difference in using agarose vs bacto agar (other than a large difference in price).
  • asked a question related to Plating
Question
4 answers
Hey everyone,
I'm trying to account for differences that may be caused by inter-plate variation during bioenergetic status measurement with a Seahorse Analyzer. I ran fourteen 24-well dishes; 4 samples each (in quadruplicate) and one inter-plate control (IPC) also in quadruplicate (the same sample ran on each plate).
My idea was to divide the values of each experimental well by the IPC mean from the respective plate, followed by multiplying the experimental wells by the mean of all IPC wells.
I checked the IPC data for normality (assumption was not met) so ran a non-parametric (Kruskal-Wallis) test using the IPC well values to determine if there was significant difference between plate controls. Result was "no" with a p = 0.1445.
As a science student struggling with statistics, any thoughts or recommendations are appreciated.
Eric
Relevant answer
Answer
I understand what you Sal Mangiafico mean, but the point here is to give you an idea of the best approach to standardization, and that's the purpose of the question, if you don't mind me saying so. The type of standardization chosen will be the distribution procedure thereafter, but first identify.
Warm Regards,
Abdi-Basid ADAN