Science topic
Plating - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Plating, and find Plating experts.
Questions related to Plating
I wanted to know the value of total flavonoid content in mgQE/gm. Total volume I kept in well plate is 200 µl in which extract was 20 µl. Anyone please help me with this problem
Please send me pictures explaining how to simulate buckling of shear stresses in Abaqus 3D with hinged and fixed support ?
I prepared an enrichment media making use of the two samples spoilt Sheabutter and Ghee (differently) and it was cultured on Olive oil agar using pour plate method. The organisms were subcultured to get pure isolates which was screened by plating them each on two different media; Tween80 agar and Tween80 with phenol red using a 5mm cork borer. Clear zones of hydrolysis was not observed and there was also no color change from red to yellow in the tween80 with phenol red media which would have indicated the presence of Lipase producing Fungi.
I am checking GFP fluorescence level in heme sensor. 200 ul of sample was loaded in black flat bottom 96 well plate in H1 Synergy machine. Temperature was 30 degree.
I am using S. cerevisiae WT in W303 background as control.
We are screening for bacteria capable of producing extracellular protease ( / proteinase / peptidase). We focus on Lactobacillaceae like Lactobacillus helveticus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri etc. We use agar plates with UHT skimmed milk. We insert the pippette tip with bacterial suspension into the agar plate and eject the pipette.
After a few days of incubation, we indeed see the clerance zones, but, immediately around the injection site, there is a white zone first and the cleared halo is on the edge of it. See the photo.
What is the white zone ? Is seems to be located inside the agar layer, neither on the surface nor at the bottom of the agar plate. Is it the biomass of lactobacilli growing inside the agar ? Or some casein metabolite / precipitate ? Or something else ?
For this test, the bacterial cultures were streaked on Pikovskaya’s
agar medium (HiMedia Laboratories, India) and supplied
with tricalcium phosphate in Petri plates. Plates were then
incubated at 28 + - 2 degrees C for 72–96 h. The formation of
clear halo zones encircling the bacterial colonies indicated
phosphate solubilization.
1. What would be the concentration and volume of tricalcium phosphate if added to 1L media bottle
2. What would be the concentration and volume of tricalcium phosphate if added to Petri dish?
Do we add before autoclaving the media or after autoclaving?
Hey,
I would like to know more about HRM analysing. can anyone assist me regarding the analysing the data which were taken from this experiment?!
I have used MeltDoctor reagent and I calibrated quantstudio 3 with HRM plate in advance. Attached you can see the result from my samples.
Thank you in advance.
Fatemeh
Hello all. I purified some plasmids after doing precultures of strains from a 2-month old plate in -4 degrees. The PCR results were fine and I used theses plasmids to transform Agrobacterium cells. Should I be concerned about physiological changes for these strains from the old plate or even mutations concerning their genetic material ? (PS: I have the strains in glycerol too and I know that spread from glycerol stock should be a best practice).
Hello everyone,
I have a monoclinic C2 space group single crystal sample glued to a tenon plate. I know the surface normal direction and the edge plan of the crystal. Also, I know the XY plane of the tenon plate. How can I get the Euler angles to relate the frames of the sample and the tenon plate (Lab frame)?
Any article or suggestion on how to go about this problem will be much appreciated. Thanks in advance
(I have also attached a picture of the crystal on the plate. The circle in the picture marks the surface normal direction (1 0 -2) and the edge plane is (0 1 0). The blue vectors represent the frame of the tenon plate)
The image attached is a streak plate for DH5a cells on a non-antibiotic plate. I have white colonies visible at the start of my streaking [ I drew an initial deposit]. I also see these white colonies in the transformed plate with carbenicillin [image not attached]. In addition, when non-antibiotic fresh plates were incubated without inoculation, 3-4 colonies were found. Do my incubator needs cleaning?
Good day to everyone,
I have little experience with culturing yeast, so I was wondering if someone could help with an issue I've encountered. I haven't seen many defined colonies from my plates of baker's yeast grown on agar, but I have been seeing these cloudy and spreading colonies of growth, and I am questioning if these were still yeast. Non of my control plates seem to have this issue, only certain treatement plates (the pink-tinted plate is also agar, just with some coloring).
Could this be contamination, perhaps from bacteria or some other fungi?
I appreciate any help, as I would like to avoid this in the future!
Best regards.
Hello everyone,
I am currently growing Human microglia cells HMC3 in 100 mm plate.
My question is what is the estimated Protein concentration (within range) of 1 ml HMC3 cell lysate? I usually start cell lysis at 80-90% confluency.
Thank you.
Hi there,
I am having problems with 50ul Matrigel domes completely dissolving in 24 well plates. I am trying to generate organoid cultures, but when I remove the culture media after 2 days the domes are either gone or are partially dissolved. I use 2:1 matrigel:media ratio. I thawed the main vial of matrigel at 4 degrees overnight then put 200ul aliquots at -20 degrees. When they are needed aliquots are defrosted on ice, 24 well plates are preincubated in a 37 degree incubator and I use ice cold tips to establish the domes. I leave the plates at 37 for over an hour before adding warm media very carefully to each well. I have noticed the matrigel looks a bit soft before the media goes on. What am I doing wrong? Surely it should polymerize completely at 37? Anyone else found this or can you identify where I am going wrong?
Thanks!
I am trying to clone a 1.3kb insert in a 3 kb vector. after double digestion of the vector, when I am checking on gel it is coming on desired length, but after ligation am getting almost same number of colonies in self (vector only) and test plates. after screening via colony PCR, none of the colonies had the insert. How to overcome this issue?
Does anyone have guidance on coating 96-well plates with collagen-I? Looking for a protocol. We are using Corning® Collagen I, Rat Tail, 100 mg.
I am a student conducting research for my course and I am having trouble in finding a pill for Ketoconazole. However, there are a lot of creams available in the pharmacies. Would it be possible to use that cream when testing against grown fungi on plates?
Hello everyone,
I am facing a frustrating issue with the TC28a2 cell line. After treatment with staurosporine at concentrations of 25nM, 50nM, and 100nM, the cells begin detaching during the first media aspiration when I switch to fresh complete media. This problem occurs regardless of the incubation time. Does anyone have any advice on how to aspirate the media without losing cells?
Dear all,
For my last two experiments, my supposedly endothelial cells (differentiated from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, at passage ~35) have detached from Transwell inserts 1-2 days following seeding, looking as if I trypsinized them, and creating some cell clumps.
I expand (for 2 days) and differentiate (for 3 days) them in 48-well plates. Then I expose them to endothelial medium for one day. On the second day of endothalial medium, I transfer them to Transwell inserts that have been coated with Fibronectin and Collagen Type I. When I check 3-4 hours after seeding, I observe that they nicely attach. However, either the next day or the other day, they detach from the Transwells (Corning 3740) and I can't find the reason why.
In both of the experiments, I changed the media of the Transwells the following day after seeding. I inspected the cells both before and after the medium change. In one of them, the cells detached right after medium change although I aspirated the old medium very slowly (on the minimum speed of the vacuum suction and without touching to the membrane). In the other experiment, the cells were (mostly) fine after the medium change. But the next day after medium change (two days after seeding onto Transwells) they had detached.
The possibilities I could rule out are:
- There should be no problem with the medium contents/temperature/CO2 concentration/coating because I'm seeding the same cells to coated 48-well plates as well and applying the same conditions on them; and they stay healthy & alive.
- There is no contamination in the plates.
- It's not because they are over-crowded, I'm trying to form a monolayer indeed but they are sparsely distributed and thus they shouldn't be dying from over-confluency.
- I believe it is not about the force my medium change exerts on the cells either, because in one of the experiments cells looked fine after the medium change.
What do you think the reason could be?
Thanks in advance!
Hey there,
for an experiment I am using the heating plate. I want to heat a glycerol bath to 120°C. The magneting stirring is off. Temp set at 120°C. Now, as the temperature nears 120°C (e.g. at 110°C) an error ALL6 appears. I tried it with two different devices, the same happened to both.
In the manual it says, the error stands for when no heat increase is detected by the thermometer. Does anyone have a clue, why this happened? The temperature is still to increase after 110°C.
Thanks for a suggestion!
Regards, Vera
What are the causes of the heat being produced in the inner core and how slab pull drives the movement of tectonic plates?
How does matter and energy flow across the Earth and flow of energy as heat in Earth's interior contribute to the movement of tectonic plates?
I'm challenging bacteria with different compounds, then plating the suspension on LB agar to assess CFU and understand the bactericidal properties of my compounds. However, I'm encountering significant CFU variability between replicates of the same conditions and even controls. For example, in a recent experiment, I obtained counts of 57, 31, and 9 on three different LB plates where the bacteria were only exposed to PBS. I'm vortexing the bacterial suspension before adding it to the compounds and trying to be as uniform and consistent as possible with everything, but still experiencing a lot of variability. Any tips would be highly appreciated!
Good morning, I urgently need to perform ddPCR analysis on some samples using a QX200 Droplet Reader that's been sitting in my lab for a while. A technician came in last month to set it up and I successfully performed an experiment last Friday. On Monday, though, I switched on the Reader and noticed that none of the PCR plates I had prepared where recognized by the instrument. The green light that usually flashes green when you insert a plate doesn't light up and the software doesn't allow me to start the run. I used original Bio-Rad plates that were successfully recognized when placed in another QX200 droplet reader from a different facility. As suggested by the technician, I unmounted and cleaned the plate support, but nothing changed. We replaced both the waste and oil bottles, but without success.
Perhaps some of you fellow researchers have experienced a similar issue with this device? Thank you so much for your kind advice.
I got some bands of my compound in TLC. I want to get those compounds for further analysis means for quantification purpose. After scratching the band I have mixed with methanol in a conical flask and mixed throughly with magnetic stirrer for 15 mins. After this i want to filter this solvent. My question is for this filtration which filter paper I will prefer, wheather I will go for whatman 40 or 42 grade or something else.
I have recently started working with arabidopsis and every time I pour the agar plates, I start seeing contamination after 3rd or 4th day.
Usually, there is no contamination after I pour the agar and let it sit for one day.
The contamination occurs on some of the seedlings, as well as some random parts of the plate.
I try not to pass my hands from on top of the plates, I UV the hood and the plates for 30 mins, and always clean the hood with 70% ethanol before starting.
I am open to any suggestions on how to improve myself.
Thank you.
Good morning Research Gate scientists
I have an LB agar plate for DH5a bacteria cell storage at 4C for 6 weeks, and I tried to subculture to a new plate plenty of times but I could not get colonies at all. the colony on the storged plate is not white, as usual, It is a light yellow color.
Then, I tried to subculture using a glycerol stock, I used a loop dipped deeply on the stock, and one loop streaked on the agar plate but still, no colony appeared on the agar surface, though I tried to avoid thaw-freezing for the stock.
No antibiotic was added to the plates because it was just a simple bacteria subculture. And plates were warmed and dried before subculture and the plates were incubated at 37 C overnight, I don't know the problems. Thanks in advance for your assist
So, I am doing electrodeposition of Zn onto carbon fabric, which is my working electrode. As reference electrode, I used Ag7AgCl in 3M KCl, and as counter electrode, I used a Zn plate. After varying the current density, I see that the cathodic potential increases. Is it something to do with Gibbs energy? or the ease of overcoming the barrier to form Zn onto the cathode?
Most staining protocols for flow cytometry in 96-well plates use V-shape or U-shape plates. I would like to ask if staining could also be done in flat-bottom plates.
Thank you!
I have a plasmid with kanamycine antibiotic resistant gene and Bar as a marker gene. I need to transfer this plasmid into AGL-1 strain of agrobacterium tumefaciens. I faced a problem when I follow the protocol steps of transformation. I did not get bacterial colony even after 2-days of a LB media plate having Kan 50ug/ml.
Protocol steps
1- Take competent cells from -80 C.
2- Add 5ul of plasmid having conc. 50ng/ul in 100 ul of AGL-1 BACTERIA.
3- Keep on ice for 30 min.
4- put in liquid nitrogen for 5 min
5- keep on heat bath for 5 min.
6- keep on ice for 5-min again.
7- add 800ul of LB without antibiotic (Kan)
8- Shake for 2-hrs at 28 C.
9- spread on LB media plate with kan 50ug/ml. Keep these plates on 28 C for 2-days.
But did not get the bacterial colony.
These are the protocol steps which I followed. Anyone can guide me where I am doing mistake?
Hello! I am growing transfected cells in 24 well plate. on the bottom of each well i have a small glass cover-slip. so the cells adhere to that cover slip. I am using this method because its very easy to transfer that glass to a slide and then analyse for fluorescence. the only problem is that DAPI staining efficiency is super low. I am simply covering the glass on which the cells are growing with DAPI for 5 minutes and then analyzing. Is there another protocol that I should use in this case?
Thank you!
Hello, my question is if SPL well white plates (30196) are autoclavable? I didn't find any information in Technical Data Sheet. Thank you for your answers.
Why does the alpha ray not penetrate the paper? In the same way, why doesn't beta ray pass through aluminum plate, X-ray and gamma ray pass through lead plate and neutron radiation pass through water or solution?
What is meant by neutron beam?
Can X-ray photons be explained with fundamental particles such as electrons, protons, or neutrons?
How do convection currents drive the movement of tectonic plates and atmospheric and oceanic circulation determine regional climate?
Hi,
I am trying to subclone iPSCs by plating 200-300 cells in 6 wells previously coated with geltrex. When I plate them I use 10uM of rock inhibitor and in theory I j
keep it until a nice colony is formed. I tried both E8 and stem flex media. however the day after I plate them, I got single cells but then after 2-3days they die or they remain as single cells without proliferating. I Have tried to change their media every other day as well as every day (I thought maybe the rock inhibitor at 37 degree got degraded). Any suggestion?
Hi
In this simulation, i noticed that i have a electrical field inside a conductor almost in range of e-11.
this upper plate is connected to 10volt (DC) and by time dependent study it moves sinusoidal and lower plate is constrained.
Hi anyone who reads this, I am a MRes student looking at antibiotic application on S. aureus biofilms. After disrupting my biofilm to quantify antibiotic application on TSA. I re exposed the same disrupted bacteria to TSB on a 96 well plate. The TSA plate quantified growth, whilst the TSB plate showed a lack of growth at some antibiotic concentrations that had grown on TSA. When re exposing the plated bacteria back to TSA there was a lack of growth.
Hi everyone,
Recently, I bought a new cell line named Tenocytes from a company.
I followed the manufacturer's instructions and used their medium and coating buffer.
However, I observed that the cell was not attached to the bottom, as shown in the pictures I attached below.
As you can observe here, I saw all cells are still alive. However, they do not attach to the bottom.
I would greatly appreciate your suggestions or any advice for my experiment.
Best regards,
We bought this cell line from ATCC, and I attach a photo of a plate after passage 2. There are many small dots around the cells and it is making me concerned/suspicious of bacterial contamination. However, the description of the cell line suggests that "MDA-MB-468 (ATCC HTB-132) cells can be slow to attach and may produce large amounts of floating cells and debris."
Does anyone have any experience with this?
Thanks!
Ana
I got the cells from ATCC and I want to plate them and start culturing. So far in anywhere I couldn't find which type of coating needed for the flasks, if ever needed?
Im looking to use H2O2 with my HEK293 cells to cause a stress response in order to see if the cells become more sensitive to externally applied electromagnet fields. I need the cells to still be adherent to my 96 well plate after treatment with H2O2 while still being stressed. Has anyone used H2O2 with HEK cells and still had the cells adhere and if so at what concentration of H2O2?
I will incubate well plate for E.coli biofilm formation. After this I need to perform centrifugal filtration with Biofil 30kDa filters. Are there any tips, how to do it properly? And can I use NaCl or dH2O as solvent to first dissolve biofilm from wells and then transfer it to the filter?
And is it possible to use 24 well plate instead of 96 well plate? Or maybe plate with even less wells?
Hello everyone,
I am trying to clone the gene of interest for the mRNA hybridization ( in situ)
after cloning, and miniprepre and restriction digestion, . I don't get the desired product on the gel .
only the vector size on the gel
I followed these steps:
1. PCR run
2. gel cut and extraction by Qiagen kit
3. Ligation : 5ul 2X ligation buffer ( promega), 3ul PCR product,1ul pGEMT easy vector( promega), 1ul ligase, 1hr at room temperature incubation.
4.plated on 100ul DH5-alpha cells
I have plated only on Ampicillin plates and also on X-GAL (150ul) and IPTG (50ul) on each plate . I have colonies on both plates. but they are very small in size . Are they non-specific colonies? size of the blue colonies and white colonies are same ( quite small) .I picked white colonies from ( Amp,X-gal , IPTG plates) and did miniprep then Restriction digestion. I don't see any insert into the plasmid.
I don't understand where the mistake is. Can anyone please guide me .Thanks!
Hello all,
I am confused about calculating the CFU/mL for my serial dilutions, for context I am conducting an experiment that involves creating a standard curve of absorbency (measured via spectrophotometry) against CFU/mL of each dilution. I have conducted the spectrophotometry and plated each of my serial dilutions but my confusion occured when I began calculating the CFU/mL and found that it increased as my samples got more dilute which logically is the opposite of what I expected. Furthermore, I am unsure if it possible to calculate the viable cells in each dilution as the calculation CFU/mL=(number of colonies*dilution factor)/volume plated, seems to be for calculating the number of viable cells in the origional sample.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I am currently setting up a two step treatment on HepG2 cells in a 96 well plate, using an antioxidant and a drug. Majority of the literature that I have consulted mention a pretreatment with the antioxidant, and then treatment using a drug. For the few treatments that I have set up, I give the tretament using antioxidant dissolved in media for 24 hours, remove the media, wash with PBS and then give the drug tretament (drug dissolved in media). My confusion here is : Is this protocol correct? Or do I keep the antioxidant containing media and just add the drug containing media on top of the antioxidant treatment, without removing the antioxidant and forgoing the PBS wash. Any clarification would be appreciated
Are there any (symbolic/algebric) mathematical tools/software particularly to perform all lengthy calculations of Variational Calculus in Structural mechanics (such as, deriving governing equations and boundary conditions of structures like plates, shells etc. from their Energy functionals, integration by-parts in 2D and 3D cases, analytical Finite element methods etc.) ?, Or people do always such calculations by hand?
I have to clone a 1920 bp insert cut with NheI and HIndIII into my 7767bp vector cut with the same enzymes. Protocol used:
1. I cut 5 ug of insert vector and 2 ug of destination vector and gel purified it.
2. Performed ligation at 1:1, 1:3 and 1:5 ratios as a 10 ul reaction using T4 ligase from NEB at 16 C overnight.
3. Transformed 5 ul of ligation mix into NEB5 alpha, XL-10 Gold ultracompetent and Thermo DH5alpha competent cells according to manufacture's protocol and plated on LB +Amp plates with incubation overnight.
All reagents are new. However, I don't see any colonies after transformation. My gel picture shows that ligation has occurred I think. Lane 5, 6 and 7 are ligation products at 1:1, 1:3, and 1:5 ratios respectively. Lane 3 is cut insert and lane 10 is cut destination vector.
What could be going wrong?
How can I seed 0.5x10^6 cells per well in a 96-well plate (I only need to seed 5 wells)?
I have a T25 flask (5 mL total volume) with a cell density of 0.6x10^6 cells/mL.
I ran an ELISA but point 5 of 7 on the standard curve has a CV of 28%. The other points on the curve all have a CV less than 10%. Because I am using human bio-banked samples I don't have enough to re-run the whole kit. Rather than losing all of these data points I am wondering if anyone has experience removing a data point from a standard curve or using data from a plate which has one high CV. Looking for suggestions and help if anyone has any similar experience.
I am plating 1 million mouse spleen cells in 96-well plates. In different wells, I am adding different proteins at a concentration of 1 ug/well to try to stimulate T-cell activity. I will then incubate the spleen cells + protein for 72 hours in standard conditions (37C, 5% CO2). At the end of the 72h incubation, I plan to collect supernatant for downstream cytokine analysis. What 96-well plate bottom shape is best for this application?
I have previously performed this experiment in V-bottom wells because I needed to centrifuge them at the end and separate cells from supernatant. However, I am concerned that the V-bottom wells didn't provide enough surface area for the protein to interact with the spleen cells, since the spleen cells pelleted on the bottom after some time. Perhaps I should have incubated the cells and protein in flat bottom wells and then transferred them to v-bottoms right before centrifugation. Additionally, during the 72h incubation period, would it be beneficial to mix the cells and proteins with a multichannel one or more times, just to increase cell and protein interaction?
I'm trying to seprate amino acids using silica gel.When I spray ninhydrin solution on silica gel it get disturbed.Can anyone tell me how to observe separated amino acid on silica gel plate?
Dear scientists,
I have encountered a problem where my bacteria (Staphylococcus Epidermidis) grow perfectly fine in liquid media (Tryptic soy broth) but not on agar plates (freshly prepared TSB plates). For the TSB plates that did grow bacteria, often only one small corner grew but not other parts although I streaked all over the plate using a glycerol stock (image1). I also plated the diluted bacteria solution from a liquid culture (OD was about 0.06) on the plates yet nothing grew (image 2). When I used the bacteria that did grow on the plates to streak another agar plate (TSB), they did grow but the middle of the plate didn’t grow anything (image 5). However, when I used a 6 month old LB agar plate for streaking, the bacteria grew perfectly fine (image 3). In addition, I also used an E. Coli liquid culture to streak a TSB plate, and they grew perfectly fine (image 4). I don't understand why my bacteria have problem growing on TSB agar plates but can grow in liquid TSB media. TSB media is recommended by ATCC for the growth of S. Epidermidis. This problem has halted all of my CFU experiments as the bacteria don't grow on agar plates. Would you be able to give me any suggestions why this is happening? Your time and help are strongly appreciated!
I need some suggestions on working with the drug 5-fluoroindole. I am working on green microalgae and trying to make my strain tryptophan auxotroph. However, I am unable to make proper drug plates as the desired drug concentration is extremely low, hence difficult to measure. Secondly, 5-FI being light sensitive, it takes longer for the colonies to be visible if there are any since I need to keep the plates away from light.
Thanks.
I am developing a numerical model that optimizes the placement of ribs or stiffeners on a base rectangular plate. For the base plate, we use shell elements, while the ribs or stiffeners are modeled with beam or wire elements. To connect these components, we employ a tie constraint. The load applied to the plate is hydrostatic. To validate our model, we initially conducted an experiment on a plate without ribs and then compared the results with the numerical predictions. For the non-ribbed plate, the numerical analysis yielded a deflection of 4.56 mm, while the experimental result was 5.5 mm as shown in below Figure. When we applied the same load, boundary conditions, and material properties to the ribbed plate, we observed a significant discrepancy between the experimental and numerical results. Numerically, the deflection was 0.9 mm, but experimentally, it measured 8.7 mm as shown in below Figure. For better understanding of the connection between ribs and plate, I have uploaded a picture of 3D printing plate with ribs.
My question is this result difference is due to tie-constraint or any thing else?
Hello everyone
I am trying to design an MTT experiment for an immortal adherent cell line with doubling time of 20 hours. The goal is to evaluate effects of certain growth factors and their combination on cell proliferation and determine the optimal dose.
Many papers suggested seeding 10000 cells in 96 well plates and performing MTT at 24 h intervals or at days 1, 3, 7.
I am not sure about some technical issues:
1. should I proceed with 24 h interval assay and for how many days? or the 1, 3, 7 days evaluation is good enough?
2. can I seed 5000 cells/ well in 96 well plates instead of 10000?
3. I expect my cells to become confluent after 72 hours (starting from 10000 cells), and they definitely die without medium change, so should I change the medium every 24 hours for all plates? or just change the medium after 72 hours and wouldn't this affect my results?
Thanks a lot!
Dealing with the renolds number,mainly for plate type heat exchangers
I'm attempting to stain cancer cells in suspension from a 12-well plate for my research project. Could anyone provide guidance on the most effective staining protocols and techniques for ensuring accurate and reliable results? Any insights or recommendations on suitable staining dyes, concentrations, fixation methods, and imaging procedures would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your assistance!
I am conducting a sequential heat transfer-stress analysis for a composite wall consisting of steel plates and a concrete core, similar to concrete-filled tubes or CFTs. My analysis involves heating the wall from one of its faces using a heat transfer analysis, which runs smoothly. However, when I perform the stress analysis by inputting the results from the previous analysis, the program fails to converge after a certain amount of computation time. This is because the steel expands more than the concrete core, leading to interaction problems in the program. This issue does not occur when the temperature is applied simultaneously on all faces. Due to the deformations resulting from being exposed on only one face, the core penetrates the steel plates. How can I prevent this from happening, disregarding the fact that I already have a hard contact between both surfaces?
I dissociated EBs and replated hiPS-CM into a monolayer in a fibronectin coated plates. I had some cells in 96-well plate and others in a 12-well plate. After 24 hrs., cells became adherent and started to contract. However, after 48 hrs., I noticed cells in the 96-well plate started to detach, whereas the cells in 12-well plate were intact. What could be the reason for cells detachment? and how can I avoid this in the future?
I want to determine the melt strength of a molten polymer. We only have parallel plate rheometer to determine the rheology. Is it possible to measure the melt strength through rheometer and is there any relation between melt elasticity and melt strength
I have been trying to grow Rosetta 2 Cells transformed with Tri-Ex4 DHX36 plasmid in 600 mL culture. I transform the Rosetta 2 competent cells and plate them selected with Chloramphenicol 35ug/mL and Ampicillin 50ug/mL. The cells transform but give me two different size colonies after 24 HR incubation at 37C. One is slightly larger but few in number, and the smaller ones are more in number. I take both types of colonies and grow them separately in a 3 mL LB starter culture with the same antibiotics overnight. The next day, I tried to grow them in a larger 600 mL culture with the same antibiotics to grow them to 0.6 OD for IPTG induction for protein expression. However, even with a 1:1000 transfer (600 uL of starter culture in 600 mL LB media) or dumping the whole 3 mL culture in 600 mL, it shows almost no growth in 6 hours. If I end up leaving it overnight, the cells grow and saturate the media, and at that point, I have no way of doing IPTG induction. (Sometimes, I start to get OD 0.1 after 6 hours of incubation.)
Hello,
I’m trying to differentiate SH-SY5Y cells, at two different seeding densities. 2500 cells/well and 5000 cells/well.
Due to budget constraints I’m differentiating using retinoic acid only, however I cant find any literature that explains how much RA to add to each well.
I’ll be treating 48 wells with RA and comparing to the other cells with no treatment, and I have less than 100uL of 10uM RA in an eppindorf tube. I feel a bit stupid but I can’t seem to work out how much RA to add to each well, and if I need to dilute with DMEM?
Each well contains DMEM with 10% FBS which I’ll be reducing to 1% FBS along with the RA.
I seeded 5e6 and 3e6 SW756 cells in two 15cm dishes with equal amounts of media on Thursday, anticipating one to be confluent Monday/Tuesday, and the other to be confluent sometime later, maybe Thursday. This is my first time testing with these, so it was just a rough guess.
However, on Monday, both were equal confluency - I could not have told a difference in plates if they weren't labelled. Is this normal? Should I give less media to the 3e6 plate to get the anticipated effect, or just plate less cells next time?
Just overall curious what factors play a role in cell growth, as the 3e6 plate grew at a much faster rate with the same conditions - aside from having a higher proportion of fresh media.
As i tried to grow vibrio using LB agar media, and the whole lawn of vibrio was there after the incubation of 12 hrs at 37 degree. And the colonies were overlapping. Suggest the way to get clear colonies on the plates.
I did a Gibson assembly reaction and consequently, I did the transformation with my construct to E. coli DH5alpha and I plated the bacteria into 20 µg/mL Kanamycin agar plates. The first time the colony PCR result was successful, however, last week I did another colony PCR with the same colonies that I chose (which I had frozen to make the backup), and this shows primers dimers. Idk what's going on, do you have some ideas about it? My positive control was effective and showed the respective band in the gel.
I'm doing mic and mbc following the disc diffusion assay. I want to calculate the cfu value for the microbial growth in the plate. Can you please share any relevant article or the exact calculation?
Hi,
I'm facing a recurent problem with the cloning of a given cDNA. Everytime I'm doing the cloning I end up with a mix of big and small colonies on the insert+vector plate while getting only few big ones on the vector alone plate. The small ones are clearly not satellites, I know how do they look. I picked some of the small one but they are generally not growing in liquid. Tried to grow plates at 30°C no changes. Ran my ligation on gels and they look very efficient. I clearly don't know what to do. Any suggestions? Thanks
Hi all,
Hope you are having a nice day! I was wondering if anyone has used the bac-to-bac baculovirus expression kit to express recombinant protein? There is a step when creating the virus, where you transform a shuttle vector into DH10bac competent cells which contain a bacmid. This recombines with the shuttle vector to introduce your gene of interest into the bacmid, which you then isolate. I have followed this procedure using the manufacturer's specifications, and do get colonies. When I screen my control (uses a control vector sent with kit), the recombination did occur, but did not occur with my gene. I picked six colonies from each. The control vector has an insert which is a similar size to my insert. You select with gentamicin (shuttle vector encodes resistance), tetracycline (helper plasmid which contains genes that help facilitate the recombination event), and kanamycin (bacmid has resistance gene). Blue/white selection with bluo-gal and IPTG is supposed to select for recombination, colonies with recombinant bacmid should be white, not blue. I bought new bluo gal for my plates, so definitely should be good, and am getting many colonies on my plate but none are blue (which again would be negative.) However, when I screen them, they contained unrecombined bacmid. I have just picked 20 colonies off of the plate and am screening with colony PCR. My next ideas if I don't get anything from that are to up the bluo gal, up the IPTG, and troubleshoot/ use more of my shuttle vector in case actual transformation is the problem (kit has me using 1 ng which to me, seems low for this application.) The cells are expensive however, and I don't know much about optimizing recombination/ratios, etc. Does anyone have any suggestions? Sorry for any incorrect terminology or statements, I am completely new to this system. Also, I have attached a schematic of the system from the manual in case this helps.
Thanks,
Claire
Also, sizes:
Shuttle vector + my gene: approx 8 kb
Bacmid: 135 kb
I did the MTT assay twice. The first time, the absorbance values was inconsistent among the wells. The second time, the values was somehow close to each other, but still different. Do you have any useful recommendations?
Thanks
I have been working with HepG2 cells for some time with no problem. The past couple months when I've been plating into 96 well plate for experiments I am noticing the cells are not healthy or growing. The same cell line in the T-75 flask are growing well. Pictured are the cells in the T-75 compared to the 96 wells. From the same cell line, plated the same day. What could be going wrong?
I'm facing a puzzling question. I stained two different cell lines of the same type and observed DAPI dots in the cytoplasm of one, unlike the typical DAPI pattern in the other (see images). Both were untreated and on the same plate, subjected to similar treatment.
Has anyone encountered a similar issue? Any hypothesis of what can it be? We have done mutiple mycoplasma testing by PCR and turned out negative. Also, if contamination is present and the cells share the same plate, shouldn't the contamination transfer between them?
thank you very much for your help
Hello,
I would like to ask a question. I want to do PCR from a large amount of sample, but it does not fit on my plate. This means that in order to test them all, I have to put them on more plates, which means doing at least two PCR runs. Then I would like to compare each sample with each other. My question is. Is it necessary to have a housekeeping gene in every PCR run? Or it is enough to have it only in the first run and relate the samples from other PCR runs to this housekeeping gene.
Thank you for answer.
The dead and alive C.elegans is mixed on one NGM plate, how can I separate alive one from dead one in a very rapid way?
Besides , those living C.elegans has very low athletic ability.
I am trying cloning of my gene of interest in pet28a vector and trying to transform it in DH5a. But after transformation I got this type of plate. Can anyone tell me what is the problem here?
I am looking for an alternative to analye my qPCR results as qBase+ is not available anymore since the compagny was bought by CellCarta. I use 2-3 reference genes to normalize my results. I work with 96- or 384-well plates.
Thank you in advance for your help!
I'm doing a protocol in which I plate my cells in a 12-well plate with complete medium (i.e. DMEM/F-12 WITH 5% FBS), let them reach ~80% confluency and then I change the complete medium for a starving medium, containing only 0.5% of FBS. Right after I change, some of the cells suffered from alteration in their morphology. It didn't happen in all the wells, but in most of them. I took pictures from moments before and after changing the medium. This cell are EA.hy926, an immortalized endothelial cell.
What can cause this kind of alterations? It seams like the cells are shrinking, although I've never notice anything like that before in other protocols and other plates. Could it be incompatibility with cell plate i'm using (Corning).
Thank you!
The cells are genetically engineered and grown on PDL plates for a potency assay. My BCA is highly variable. I am wondering if triton disrupts the PDL coating, which then interferes in the BCA leading to the variability observed. Can this variability be a result of triton releasing lysine from the plate coating?
The cells are genetically engineered and grown on PDL plates for a potency assay. My BCA is highly variable. I am wondering if triton disrupts the PDL coating, which then interferes in the BCA leading to the variability observed.
Hey, I am currently doing my thesis and I am working with skin cells to detect a specific biomarker. I want to look for a biomarker in my collected media after treating them with 4 different treatments. However, my supervisor said that we would run them undiluted and diluted. So, how would I approach that ? Should I run a plate with undiluted samples and another plate where all samples are 1:2 diluted? So, for each sample should I add 100ul of the supernatant with 100ul of new fresh media to obtain this dilution and then run both plates to see if the concentration of my biomarker is detectable on the standard curve.
Please I need a full answer and some explanations.
Thank you
Design a brazed plate heat exchanger for given fluids
Liquid hydrogen -20 kelvin and at 6 bar coverts to gas
Neon -100 kelvin and at 1 bar coverts to liquid
Q=200KW
I am using a pET28B vector to clone my 2.1kb insert digested with BamH1 (fwd) and Xho1 (rev) restriction enzymes. I'm using over 1ug of DNA for restriction digestion, kept at 37°C for over 3 hours. For cohesive end ligation, I'm using Promega T4 ligase, and keeping the setup (3:1, 5:1 and 7:1; insert: vector) for 16 hours before transforming in Dh5alpha competent cells followed by plating on Kan plates. I've been doing this for quite sometime now. But everytime, all I get are false colonies. I've tried to troubleshoot every single step but to no avail. My ligase is also new.
I want to simulate lamb wave propagation in 3D thin cracked plate using transient analysis in ansys apdl. I have selected some nodes to apply time dependent loading function.There is not any error. but after solution I can not see propagation of wave and loading only affect on the selected nodes not the whole plate. can anyone help me.thanks in advance
Using the same probe and on the same PCR plate, both abnormal Taqman qPCR multicomponent plot normal Taqman qPCR multicomponent plot were observed. The only difference between the two is the template. Then what is the problem?
hello sir
i am doing simulation of on PU foam same as literature. I am considering PU foam block and bottom is fixed and top rigid plate striking with velocity. I am using material modal MAT_083 in LS DYNA.
this model is based on strain rate dependent. so when i applying the velocity on plate and plate is striking so block showing unrealistic very large deformation and some time not compressing as i want. and in message file showing negative volume error. please tell me what should i do. and i already done lots of changes. but problem is same.
I am modeling a masonry wall in LS DYNA, which has multiple interfaces in between. To simulate the interface between blocks I use the TieBreak contact, which requires normal and tangential strengths and stiffnesses. The normal properties are defined to model the tensile behavior, however, I do not know how to assign a compressive behavior for this contact.
For instance, I modeled two steel plates with TieBreak contact in between, when I applied compressive force on the upper plate it started to penetrate the lower plate, which is not reasonable.
How can I avoid penetration in this contact?
It was easy to find the equation of indentation from Hertz contact theory when a sphere and a flat surface are indenting or 2 spheres are indenting, from Hertz contact theory. However, currently, I am indenting a cylindrical-shaped fibre with a flat plate indenter (so it's a flat-cylindrical contact). I saw the equation of contact area but I did not see the equation for contact depth. Can you please give me with some references?
I did lawn on an E. coli strain onto a plate of Mueller-Hinton agar. For other plates I got clear zones of inhibition, but for few particular antibiotics (CRO, OFX and CIP) against this strain some colony growth is observed. So is this strain resistant against these antibiotics?
I am modeling the Kirchhoff plate through FEM. I have already used the Q4 element.
However, I want to use the Q8 element. Is this possible? If yes, how many items should be in the approximate polynomial to derive the shape functions according to Pascal triangle?
I've been trying to isolate bacteriophages specific to soil bacteria (isolated from low, moderate and highly saline soils from research extension centers) for the last couple of months using the enrichment method followed by plaque assay. However, I'm always ending up with no plaques in my diluted plates (with complete lysis in the undiluted one). I'm keeping positive controls (w/o phages) and negative controls (media only). I'm using the following protocol:
- O/N Incubation of soil samples with host bacteria (Bacillus toyonensis) in LBMC (2.5 mM MgSO4 and CaCl2 in final media) at 30 degree C, followed by centrifugation @ 4700 rpm for 20 mins, adding chloroform to supernatant, 5 mins incubation and 5 mins centrifugation @ 4700 rpm for 5 mins and flitering using a 0.22 micron filter.
- Multiple rounds of enrichment (with chloroform sterilization and filtering) of the lysate with host until OD drops approx 10 times relative to +con. I also prepared another control by treating the +con with the same lysate collection treatment as with the one containing phages, since I was suspicious something in the media is killing my host before they can be infected by the phages. Interestingly, I found this control showing almost similar drop in OD relative to +con, although no phages were added here, thus confirming my suspicion.
- Plaque assay with 8-10 ten-fold dilutions of the final lysate added to host in early stationary phase (OD=0.2-0.3), in 1.5% LBMC plates, 0.7% soft LBMC agar kept at 42 degrees (I also tried 0.3% and 0.2%), incubated at 30 degrees as well as 37 degrees O/N. No plaques in dilution plates, undiluted stock showing complete lysis. Tried keeping the plates for longer times as well (upto 5 days) with similar results.
In my understanding, some sort of endolysins/toxins might be getting enriched in the culture media and killing the hosts, thereby not letting the phages infect the bacteria and multiplying. I also tried using a second host (Serratia plymuthica) and ended up with the same results. I'm relatively new to this and I would really appreciate any help/thoughts/suggestions on how to troubleshoot this.
I've never seen anything other than bacteria and this doesn't look like anything I can find on Google! Is it fungus?? This is a plate of neurospheres if that helps.
Hello everyone,
I want to know how many cells are in my glycerol stocks. They were all made in the same way, and they yield similar results, but I kind of forgot about one step or two before making them, which means that I don't know how many microorganisms there are "originally".
Would that be okay to simply unthaw couple of stocks, conduct a serial dilution (100 ul from a stock into 900 ul of saline solution) and just follow the steps similarly to SP-SDS or 6x6 method? Is there necessity of "bacterial activation", given that they will be incubated on agar plate anyways?
If there is a need of "bacterial activation" - What kind of method would be the best suitable, given that I don't want to use enormous numbers of plastic plates, agar powder and wanting to just be more less-waste?
Thanking for your answers in advance,
Matty
Hello!
I am investigating the extrudability of our bio-ink through rheology. Previously, I used a parallel plate to acquire the shear rate of the sample after which I tried an actual extrudability test with a 3D printing machine for viscoelastic material. I find it trivial at first to acquire the data with a parallel plate knowing that the pneumatic piston pushing the ink through the cartridge is closely conical in shape.
Would there be any significant difference at all if I choose to test it with a conical upper plate? We only have one rheometer at this moment so as much as possible I would not want to waste time.
I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on this. Thank you in advance!
Yes = Accurate @Measurements #Weights ^Elementals *Plates %Feels (Tectonic: Shifts)
No = Shifts @Elementals #Weights ^Tectonic *Measurements %Accurate (Feels: Plates)
Key: Water
Note: Immigration
Commentary: Security
Hello,
I am performing gene study analysis. Due to the many genes, I can´t run all my samples in one plate. For this reason I am using an inter-run calibrator.
How do I fit the calibrator into the calculation for the expression?
Hi, everyone!
I am a graduate student of pharmacology from China. I am trying to measure the plasma NETs level with anti-MPO antibody and Sytox Green, which are available in our lab. Here's how I did it.
Firstly, a high-binding 96-well plate were coated overnight at 4 ℃ with anti-MPO antibody(1 μg/mL, Thermo). The plate was washed 1 time with wash buffer, then blocked with 4% BSA in PBS supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20 for 1.5 hours at room temperature. The plate was washed 3 times again, then incubate with plasm (100 μL) for 2 hours at 37 ℃, 300 rpm. The plate was washed 5 times before incubating for 15 minutes with Sytox Green in dark (100 μL, 1:1000, Thermo). The fluorescence intensity (excitation at 485 nm and emission at 535 nm) was quantified.
But there was no difference in fluorescence intensity between plasma and negative controls. I'm not sure what went wrong. I hope anybody who did it can give me some advice. Thank you so much for your generous help!
Best wished!
Yafei, Fang
Hello dear researchers,
Do you know how to solve and prove the formula 5.27 (The Volume Expansion Coefficient for Low Solute Concentration) mentioned in the "diffusion mass transfer book" by Skelland? This formula is used in the section related to (distributions of velocity and concentrations in the laminar natural convection on a vertical plate) and is shown in the attached photo.
Regards,
Hi all,
I have been doing drug screening on clinical samples and multiple 384-well plates are used for each samples. However, when we look at the cell number in the DMSO control on each plate, there is a trend of decreasing number of cells from plate 1 to plate 5. There is no problem within the plate i.e. cell numbers are even in the same plate.
The way I do it is to use a Pipetboy, mix the cell solution a few times, and take 8 mL and put it in the reservoir. Then they were pipetted them using a electronic multichannel pipette which can dispense 4 columns of wells for each aspiration. I rocked the reservoir back and forth before each aspiration. After finishing one plate, I mix the cell solution thoroughly again and take another 6-8 mL of cells to the reservoir. The tips and reservoir I used are both from Integra.
This happens to both cell lines and primary samples, and it has been bothering me for a long time. Has anyone seen the same problem and has a solution for it?
Many thanks.
Hello,
I am new to working with human microvascular endothelial cells (bought from Sigma), and there is varying information on how many passages you can take these cells to and still get a reliable inflammatory response when stimulated. Does anyone have any experience on how these cells may change or how their inflammatory response may change with increased passaging?
And while I'm here, do these cells need a special treatment in the wells when plating (i.e., 12-well, 48-well plates)
Thanks for any help!
Does an increment in the width of the magnet and electrode in the Riga plate affect the fluid flow behaviour in skin friction and heat transfer rate?
I was doing transformation using plasmid with kanamycin resistance into BL21 DE3 E. coli cells with ampicillin resistance. I plated the culture on amp+kana plates and amp only plates. However, only colonies were found on the amp only plate. Since the transformation has fail several times before this, I decided to inoculate the colony from the amp only plate and continue the experiment (grow the culture to 0.55 OD600 and add IPTG). Afterwhich I ran a SDS-PAGE. I observed a difference between before IPTG and after, and the protein bands in the after IPTG lane corresponded to my protein of interest, which should not have been expressed... Does anyone have any knowledge about this? Please help.
Hey everyone,
I'm trying to account for differences that may be caused by inter-plate variation during bioenergetic status measurement with a Seahorse Analyzer. I ran fourteen 24-well dishes; 4 samples each (in quadruplicate) and one inter-plate control (IPC) also in quadruplicate (the same sample ran on each plate).
My idea was to divide the values of each experimental well by the IPC mean from the respective plate, followed by multiplying the experimental wells by the mean of all IPC wells.
I checked the IPC data for normality (assumption was not met) so ran a non-parametric (Kruskal-Wallis) test using the IPC well values to determine if there was significant difference between plate controls. Result was "no" with a p = 0.1445.
As a science student struggling with statistics, any thoughts or recommendations are appreciated.
Eric