Psychology - Science topic

I am a student working on my research thesis in AI and psychology and am seeking the expertise of a qualified psychologist to provide guidance and assistance. I would greatly appreciate insights on refining research questions, selecting appropriate methodologies, analyzing data, and interpreting findings. Your expertise will contribute significantly to the quality and depth of my research. Thank you for considering this opportunity to collaborate.

In the context of research that intersects economics and business science with psychology, how can a researcher explore subjects from the latter field, and what percentage of their time would be considered appropriate to successfully integrate this multidisciplinary approach into their research?

This question is about the enduring relevance of the Kamasutra's philosophical underpinnings in understanding human relationships and intimacy today. Also to delve into its broader cultural impact beyond its explicit content, exploring themes of love, desire, and interpersonal connections across diverse contexts and time periods.

La psicología clínica es la rama de la psicología relacionada con la evaluación y el tratamiento de la salud mental, comportamiento anormal y problemas psiquiátricos. Este campo integra la ciencia de la psicología con el tratamiento de los problemas humanos complejos.

I think so because

I'm eager to hear your professional views about patient psychology!

Just as in the human animal, and even more often than in the human animal, petting among the other mammals is primarily, although not exclusively, male activity which is directed toward the female. As in the human species, it is the male which is more likely to be aroused psychologically and usually before he makes any physical contact. (Alfred Kinsey)

MAYBE eternal individual consciousness:

1)

2)

Do you know any theory that talks about making consumers perceive products as friends through product messages or advertising messages?

I am doing a replication of an experiment regarding attractiveness and I am looking for photos I could use in it.

Are you aware of a study that estimated the number of people who are permanently (psychologically) affected by a single road fatality?

For example, on average # of family members, # of close friends, # of eyewitnesses, # of rescue personnel... are permanently affected by a single road fatality.

I have seen several people talking about such numbers, but they never provide a reference to the original study.

Thanks.

I'm looking for an appropriate journal in which to publish the dissertation research of one of my undergraduate Psychology students. This student died by suicide recently, so I wanted to get their dissertation published to honour them, and as a gesture for their family. I would edit it, but ideally would like to change as little as possible, so that their voice was preserved in the final publication.

What journals are currently in operation that have a focus on first-time publications in Psychology? I understand that the BPS' PsyPAG is currently on hiatus.

I have come across some ideas which I hope will be pursued by academics in the associated disciplines:

1) Topics Broadly outlined in the following articles

Fathabadi OS (2022) Voluntary Selection; Bringing Evolution at the Service of Humanity. Scientific J Genet Gene Ther 8(1): 009-015.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17352/sjggt.000021

Fathabadi OS (2023) The way of future through voluntary selection. Glob J Ecol 8(1): 034-041. DOI: 10.17352/gje.000079

2) Explanation of how violence is the link between evolution and society. What is not clear in the articles above is that just as a disease shows symptoms such as fever in its early stages, violence that is caused by the lack of evolutionary order in society also shows itself in the form of problems like bullying, harassment, discrimination, passive aggression, coercive control, etc and then It may appear in the form of an increase in the rate of crimes and social riots and finally in the form of naked violence, civil wars, genocides and foreign wars. The purpose of the topics raised in both articles is to realize the evolutionary order through the methods proposed in control engineering and by achieving the desired statistical goals, not only to prevent violence, but also to spread satisfaction in the society and to provide internal and external security.

3) Interpretation of historical events including genocides and world wars through the lens of insights provided above for example how passive aggression became widespread prior to such events.

4) The articles above argue that Control Theory, in conjunction with data science, can help establish and maintain democracies with an unprecedented level of stability and provide optimal levels of living standards by regulating evolutionary health of societies and the relationships between them. This goal however, requires interpretation of the theory widely used in engineering, for application in Humanities. Control Engineering remains a rather challenging field to learn and its theoreticians and practitioners are mostly active in areas other than humanities - most critically politics - and even despite the large number of engineering graduates receiving education in Systems and Control Theory as part of their curriculum, the specific practical pathway for application of the theory for solving problems in Humanities remains rather unclear; let alone the inaccessibility of the field to the practitioners of humanities even to the extent necessary to allow them to express the problems in terms approachable by control engineering experts. Projects should therefore be defined to develop highly targeted educational materials and tools which provide a shortcut to applying the theory in solving practical problems in humanities. It is particularly important to understand that the type of Control Theory applicable to Humanities would be "Non-Linear Time-Varying Control" which is an extension of control Theory as relevant to most engineering problems and as such, the specific theory will need to be developed specifically beyond what a classically educated expert in Control Engineering would be comfortably equipped with even if educated with a PhD. For example the types of time constants and uncertainties relevant in Humanities and the types of irregularities which can be created by collective mis-intentions of social groups as well as moral aspects of implications of such techniques on human population will extend to matters associated in politics, biology, culture, education, and media. Actually it is important to understand that the knowledge and tools, will not act as a pill to fix problems but through insights, they provide directions and "Decision Support Systems" with local applicability and temporal relevance which despite their limitations, will provide unprecedented powers for providing better living standards for all populations and individuals. Such tools need to be maintained in order to remain relevant to the changes in the system under control and time. The developed materials will help students, researchers and practitioners get started and up to speed with the expertise through minimal training or self-study and the impact I believe would be revolutionary. In addition to Systems and Control Theory, the mentioned books/educational materials/tools may also cover topics such as Programming, Differential Equations, Numerical Optimisation, System Identification, Artificial Intelligence and to some extent Statistics. The set of these topic may one day help establish an independent field of study namely "Humanities Engineering".

5) Applications of the theory, educational materials, and tools mentioned above, to solve practical problems associated in sociology, psychology, politics and other fields of humanities is the ultimate goal and such projects make great topics for research in universities, Think tanks, and governments. It is important to mention that using the mean-values and standard deviations defining phenotypic profiles of populations is a way of taking into account the differences of different populations in achieving desirable results within them and in regulating the relationship between them.

6) It is also possible to characterise discourses, and broadcasted contents by defining relevant indices that quantify various aspects of them and then model and predict their relationship with the outcomes in society. These models can then act as decision support systems to identify and implement adjustments for achieving the desired social outcomes. If sufficiently predictive, they can also be used in combination with other models or in isolation as part of the control loops associated in Control Theory in order to achieve the desired outcomes in terms of sustainability, social stability, freedoms, economic welfare, health, national security, psychological security, gender equality, and optimal levels of happiness in all individuals and social groups, etc.

7) It is possible to compile a set of contents including matters mentioned in the articles above, to act as a mental anchorage for people. Something that is scientifically proven, convincing and understandable by those who put in the effort and allows them to remain motivated, morally directed, socially responsible and supported and mentally healthy. I believe adding a content starting from Genetics explaining how "Life is a complex Product of Nature" and how "Survival and Reproduction are Complex Interpretations of Laws of Nature" is necessary. Topics such as cosmology and Quantum Physics can also be included.

8) It is possible to define a project on optimal forms of democracy for different populations with emphasis on the fact that peoples' choices represent their interests as they understand them as individuals while much of what comprises our existing living standards or is necessary for achieving higher standards of living are a result of societies and mechanisms maintaining them. Societies were formed by cultures/religions as an aftermath of painful evolutionary events which occurred when people pursued their personal interests and emerged as optimal ways of achieving a better average standard of living for larger numbers of individuals over a larger proportion of their lives. In other words, many aspects of our existing living standards are by-products of societies and could not be achieved or maintained only pursuing our individual choices which is what a democracy guarantees. Democracies should be pursued for optimum living standards and preventing abuse however, it is necessary to have democracies in place to guarantee the maintenance of society itself (what you can call an evolutionary order) and realise/maintain its desired levels of standards of living and this should not be compromised by the choice of individuals.

9) Ethics of Voluntary Selection and application of methods concerned in Control Theory and AI in solving problems in Humanities specially to prevent abuse of individuals, and minorities under the flag of interests of society and to prevent creating senseless scientific approvals for imposing disadvantage on individuals and social groups. It is also necessary to minimise pain imposed on individuals and social groups in transitions as a result of adjustments.

10) While the first article introduces the concept of "Voluntary Selection" and a methodology to use it in a calculated way, it only acts as a beginning and if it is going to be implemented, a huge methodological and experimental effort is needed for identifying relevant phenotypes, developing phenotypic maps for distinct populations, identifying the results when choosing donor and receiver populations, and developing tools to predict and monitor the progress of such programs besides studying the implications for society, economy and beyond. Research can also dig deeper and take into account genotype-phenotype relationships in achieving the desired results.

A researcher was assigned a dataset with a particular research question:" Does life satisfaction predict mental health?” Before doing any statistical tests, she browsed through the dataset to generate some graphs of the results. It looked like satisfaction with life predicts health outcomes more strongly in males than in females. She neglected the data on females and investigated the hypothesis that life satisfaction will negatively predict mental health in males. She finally ran the statistical test and obtained a significant p-value (< .001) associated with the regression coefficient. She concludes that the hypothesis is evidential.

Is this practice a p-hacking?

Both more broadly and specifically: Why does the polyvagal group of hypotheses still enjoy such broad popularity and acceptance when its most basic biological premises regarding vagal control have been largely—perhaps completely—refuted, and the one measurable linchpin to the polyvagal (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, or a proxy thereof) has long been shown not even to be a consistently reliable index of vagal activity of any kind, influenced as it is by mutiple other factors?

The five most basic premises of the polyvagal collection of hypotheses have by now been soundly refuted (see https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/biological-psychology/special-issue/105P98LLB4B). Additionally, the sole noninvasive, nonintrusive index of vagal control (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, or its empirical surrogates, e.g. high-frequency heart-rate variability or root mean squared successive differences of heart rate—upon which polyvagal speculations almost exclusively rest—has long and repeatedly been demonstrated to be, at best, seriously affected by nonvagal influences (e.g. sympathetic effects upon the heart, arterial carbon dioxide level, changes in respiratory pattern and brainstem respiratory pacemakers) rendering this measure as not a specific index of vagal activity of any kind (e.g. ).

Additionally numerous meta-analyses of these measures‘ relations with psychological regulatory processes and trauma yield small or extremely small degrees of association, often yielding correlations <0.15, meaning that little more than 1% or 2% of psychological regulation can be predicted by respiratory sinus arrhythmia or one of its surrogates, frequently, in fact, less than 1% (see ).

Nevertheless, the polyvagal enterprise continues to enjoy wide popularity and acceptance in certain areas of psychology and psychotherapy.

I am genuinely interested in creating an open and mutually respectful discussion of clinicians' and scientists' reasons for continued acceptance of specific polyvagal ideas in their work. It will be important to separate concepts and theoretical approaches--long in existence before polyvagal speculations--which have become conflated for many with polyvagal ideas, such as attachment theory, coregulation, social engagement, trauma reactions (e.g. emotional freezing and dissociation), or body-mind therapies or practices. Consequently, it will be particularly interesting to investigate the following questions:

1) What value do specifically "polyvagal" ideas (i.e. hypotheses tied to particular neuroanatomical brainstem vagal centers and functions) have to clarify relations between autonomic (or parasympathetic) activity and psychological functioning (especially when it is evident that the basic polyvagal premises seem to be refuted)?

2) What are the direct and specific research or therapeutic approaches embodied by polyvagal thinking, and what is the level of empirical support for each?

Dear colleagues,

I am reaching out to seek your guidance. I have recently finalized an article containing an empirical study focusing on the unique challenges faced by Ukrainian psychologists during the initial days of the war. Could you kindly recommend any journals that might be interested in publishing my work?

Attached is an abstract of the article for your reference.

Warm regards,

Anastasiia Kuntsevska

"Amidst the Storm: Ukrainian Psychologists' Early War Experiences" explores the multifaceted challenges faced by psychologists providing crisis care in Ukraine during the initial stages of the conflict. Through a comprehensive theoretical framework, this study investigates five key components: Unique Crisis Situation, Providing Help Despite Own Needs, Pro-Bono Assistance (Volunteering), Vicarious Trauma, and Learning During the War.

The research reveals the profound impact of the war on Ukrainian psychologists, who found themselves navigating unprecedented levels of trauma and stress. Psychologists reported high levels of apathy, trauma symptoms mirroring those of their clients, and difficulties in maintaining regular sleep patterns. Furthermore, engagement in pro bono assistance heightened emotional involvement and shared life difficulties with clients, while also posing challenges in managing their own well-being.

Despite these challenges, psychologists demonstrated remarkable resilience and dedication, adapting their approaches to meet the urgent needs of those affected by the conflict. The study emphasizes the importance of specialized training and resources to support psychologists in their vital role during times of crisis. Online seminars emerged as a valuable source of support, providing practical guidance and fostering professional growth.

Good morning,

I am 48yr old House wife and decided this is it I am going back to do my Honours in Psychology...and then Research Methodoly happened. Now not so deterimened as I was before WHERE do I START?

I have google several platforms for beginners luck but oi! not sure if its them or me that miss understand the word BEGINNER.

I would apprecieted any assistance or guidance as to where I can get some guidance on this quantitative correlation big group retrospective qualitiative concept measure ........etc

Thank you for your time ...much appreciated

aka "Research Mom"

How do individual differences, such as genetics and psychosocial factors, influence chronic pain experiences and treatment outcomes?

Individual differences, including genetics and psychosocial factors, play significant roles in influencing chronic pain experiences and treatment outcomes.

Hi, I am a final-year Psychology student at Newcastle University and I would like to explore the concept of women being addicted to pregnancy. I would ideally like to create a report on this for my dissertation or if accepted for a phD next year. Please let me know if anyone knows of anything. I have found plenty of news articles and blogs but I cannot find any actual research.

AI systems can be used to collect and analyze large amounts of data on human emotions, which can help us to better understand the underlying patterns and causes of emotions. They can also be used to develop new therapies and interventions for emotional disorders.

According to University of Scranton psychologist John Norcross there are around 500 types of psychotherapies. My question is that why we (professional in field of mental health) keep on developing these therapies uselessly (wasting time and energy as well as fund given by government bodies) that because ultimately we will come to eclectic approach (A safe side)

A researcher was assigned a dataset with a particular research question:" Does life satisfaction predict mental health?” Before doing any statistical tests, she browsed through the dataset to generate some graphs of the results. It looked like satisfaction with life predicts health outcomes more strongly in males than in females. She neglected the data on females and investigated the hypothesis that life satisfaction will negatively predict mental health in males. She finally ran the statistical test and obtained a significant p-value (< .001) associated with the regression coefficient. She concludes that the hypothesis is evidential.

Is this practice a p-hacking?

First of all, the so-called algorithms in BI are algorithms in imitation of the AI algorithms. They belong properly to human consciousness, which is a complex of millions of mainly brain-based neurons (their sub-neurons, sub-sub-neurons, etc.) and their activities which, together, very much connect and coordinate the consciousness within the body as “embodied” and the world. We do not discuss the brain science of the neurons and their sub-sub-… parts. To a great extent, the activities of the BI and the consciousness that embodies BI as a minute part of it are connected and coordinated within the brain-body nexus and to some extent by the world. This coordination takes place in such a manner that the ontological, connotative, and denotative universals can be conceived only by consciousnesses and not even by BI, let alone AI. If BI may be isolated from consciousnesses, their algorithms and functions may be comparable to those of AI, but BI never exists in isolation from the other brain-and-body functions.

It may be claimed that advanced AI as in some robots and ChatGPT is not a result of memory but generalization. [Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFS90-FX6pg] But here the claims of “generalization”, “sentiment neurons”, and “states of mind” are not enough. First of all, the neurons that AI specialists speak of are not living neurons. Secondly, it should be proved that the so-called procedures in neurons due to the results (‘state neurons’ and the unity of many of them called ‘state space’) of input memory (that is clearly learned as mechanically induced, not exactly learned in the manner in which consciousness learns) are themselves being termed generalization based on other imaginative names like sentiment neurons and states of mind, merely due to the generalizations involved in the very machine memory and the receptacles of such memory. Here, generalization is falsely being interpreted by claimants of fantastic AI as something done in consciousness by the intelligence alone.

The learning and recognition of patterns by decreasing entropy is also not a matter of generalization in the sense of what happens in animate objects. Even in children the manner of learning is not merely a result of an intelligence exercise; instead, many other brain functions are involved in this in consciousnesses. Thus, BI is not a prediction machine for AI to be termed so. AI algorithms and strictly BI (i.e., only intelligence, and not the other functions of the brain) algorithms never go beyond the quantitively processed, quantitively defined, and quantitatively interpretable properties of any of the data fed into its procedural memory. It becomes procedural memory and happen to be termed generalization merely because of the volume of state neurons involved in what is termed a state space (of course, it is not a “space”). When intelligence is isolated from all other functions of consciousness, the demerits of BI begin exactly from there and indicate regions far beyond.

For the above reasons, it is not acceptable to describe the demerits of BI in terms merely of the absence of willing, emotions, intentionality, intentions, love, social life, morality, etc. of persons. Unlike in the case of AI, BI has at least some direct organismically based connections to these and to the three theoretical functions of consciousness mentioned above: (1) to discover the foundational Categories and ontological universals behind the objects, phenomena, and data, (2) to find out the social or genetic causes of the abiding emotions, and (3) to imagine the possible non-answers or non-solutions for the problems. It is the mechanistic-scientistic thinking of the experts that delinks from BI these and other non-BI functions of consciousnesses.

I have to write a research paper on Jose Germain for a Psychology in Spain class, but I can hardly find any information on him and how he affected the history of psychology in Spain.

I am wondering which term is more appropriate for use in titles when discussing a group within a larger category: 'among' or 'in'?

For example:

'Prevalence of sleep disorders among children with autism'

'Prevalence of sleep disorders in children with autism'

Could you explain the difference between using 'among' and 'in' in such contexts and advise which option is more suitable for title usage?

Are you a full-fledged empiricist and see a totally empirical Psychology?

Maybe if you don't see that you will after reading about 1000 pages of my writings :

The unwritten rule is "don't look suspicious. If people do look suspicious then they either get destroyed or subvert enough TO survive."

Sources:

1)

2)

psychological variables that varies with disaster proneness

S. I. Hayakawa and others studied how high-level abstract words, though representing things not physically present agitate the human nervous system. People feel pulled upon and assaulted by hurtful language or (perhaps in response) those subjected to emotionally-charged speech/texts deploy weaponized speech and texts at others.

People feel a full somatic response to such language. Their bodies get excited and their mind re-apportion memory storage.

See the then-Chicago-based Linguist Hayakawa's _Language in Action_. When published in the 1940s, this was unverifiable linguistic-physiological theory. Now tests are proving the mind-body effect of heated speech on retrofitting our brains. That is, repeated exposure to buzz words, slogans, memes do in fact cause more bypass of the prefrontal analytical lobe and cause speech and text to be cursorily processed by the crudely two-valued amygdala. This results in less synaptic hooks for shades of complexity in thinking. Experimental Psychology has measured excitation levels and induced for getting in repose to the war cries of partisan politicians and pundits.

How can non-Aristotelian rhetoric help to slow responses and also lower the "heat?"

Please share any comments and pointers to studies here.

LANGUAGE IN ACTION:

Holiday wishes for a new year that holds better communication and more peaceful linguistic, rhetorical interactions.

Hello!

My name is Mahnoor and I am a 4th year bachelor's student in psychology, my research project aims to discuss about the factors that influence the employees intention to stay, but I'm not able to find a questionnaire with the proper guidelines of how to score/interpret it's results.

If anyone can help me find a questionnaire or a scale to measure this variable of mine, it would be a huge help!

Looking forward to a response.

Best Regards,

Mahnoor

I would be interested in your opinions and own experiences on Jaron Lanier and Tristan Harris' case on how social platforms and the modern age of (monetized) big data manipulate behavior and deteriorate the ability to think critically in an individual.

I don't mean how sophisticated algorithms suggest the best-placed advertisings, that's a commonly known fact and everybody is aware of that nowadays.

What I mean is the perceived "stupification" of younger generations, fueled by overuse of technology in general, and social platforms in particular. The sophisticated tailoring of those platforms to the short attention spans, the mainly senseless content, the biased bubbles and so on, to me, appear to lessen the critical thinking abilities (and -willingness), paired with the Dunning-Kruger-Effect, that those who are the least informed have overwhelming confidence in their ill-informed opinions.

I have a very strong opinion on this, but it may also be biased by experiences I have made throughout the past years as an educator, and deterred by the sort of students I have worked with. I would like to see a bigger picture, not research trends.

So, what are your subjective impressions on the phone- and social platform addicted young generation and their cognitive abilities, their willingness to achieve excellence, and the influence new media has on them?

Words get thrown around. Terminology changes. Therefore, syntax is center of linguistics.

We used to have some project that discussed these interesting topics. I hope some of you will start this discussion going from your own perspective. How does art connect with science? My husband works in science and I am definitely one of those "mind wanderers" who get so easily distracted because in art we think associatively.

I almost daily have to think why I don't mind how my mind works. What are your thoughts in these two very different styles of cognitive activity?

When full empiricism seems to have a foothold and more is sought (no compromises sought) then in the psychological, biological and the social : the Age of Reason may begin .

I completed my PhD last year and am currently not affiliated with or employed by a university. I continue to utilize my previous affiliation for manuscripts resulting from the projects I undertook during my PhD. However, I am involved in other collaborative projects. I am curious about the possibility of obtaining an honorary status from a university or research institute for the purpose of publication, allowing me to use their affiliation until I secure a post-doc or research position in a university or institution. Is this feasible?

Its terms are different, but the theory and thought proposed are very close.

"Case conceptualization" and "psychological analysis" are the same or very similar concepts

"Psychological program" and "psychological process" are very close, attention, "psychological program" this article on the definition of psychological program is "psychological process" and "physiological process".

The first article and the second article use "case conceptualization" to obtain the psychological process, and the third article uses "psychological analysis" to obtain the psychological procedures, and they are actually doing the same things. The article "psychological program" uses a flow chart to present "psychological program", and the other two also use a flow chart to present "psychological process", The difference is that its arrow can be oriented in two directions.

With studies moving online, it would be great to know about any reliable and valid online IQ tests. Using online tests of IQ could be essential in the current COVID-19 situation.

i am doing a thesis, and need a scale to measure my variable I'm able to find the research about the development of the scale but not the scale itself.

Aunque un trabajador social no es especialista en psicología, ambas ramas están muy ligadas y suelen ser profesionales complementarios en equipos de instiutuciones como los Servicios Sociales (comunitarios y especializados). Me interesaría conocer cómo puede intervenir entonces el trabajador social en el entorno de la persona con el trastorno, más que con la persona en sí, en este tema en específico.

I have an unusual problem in deciding how to place this article I wrote with two colleagues. I am a psychological trauma expert, but also a statistician. During COVID, as my students turned to working online more often, I developed in interest in the methods psychologists use to identify data integrity and to decide how to remove problematic subjects. So we did a prevalence study using 1500 randomly selected publications utilizing MTurk and tracked how they made their decisions. Then we developed a category system of techniques, and wrote a critique of how well each technique worked and a how-to description of how use it most effectively. I’ve published a few papers in Psych Bull and planned it for that journal. I sent my first draft out to friends and got the most positive response I’ve ever gotten for an article, with virtually every one saying that they would use the information in their own work and asking to cite it. But here’s the problem. After finishing it, I sent it to a friend who has been an associate editor at times for Psych Bull, and, while joining the rave reviewers, he thought that it simply was not likely to be accepted in that journal given that it was not really a lit review of a content area. He suggested Psych Methods, but that journal has tight page limits, and is much more mathematical in its typical selection. I’m trying to write to be useful to the typical psychological researcher studying psychopathology, attitude, etc. online. Weirdly, although this is not my typical PTSD/dissociation paper, it may be one of the more important papers that I have written, but I’m worried that I just won’t be able to find a home for it. I’m even willing to consider journals that are pay to play, which I’ve never done before, if I can’t find a fit. Do you have any ideas?

Unethical businessmen aided by politicians have transgressed boundaries of ethical, equitable, sustainable living in the pursuit of short-term profits and immediate self-gain to support certain exclusive lifestyles. The excuse used is 'competition' or 'everyone else is doing it'. This greed has now seeped into lay individuals, families, children, societies, nations and are creating unrest and dissatisfaction at all levels of the human-ecosystem. To feed this greed, newer and newer technologies are created to benefit a few. The immediate outcome of these misguided priorities is bad health-of individuals, economies and the environment. Long-term effects include obesity, divorce, war and the resultant effort to create more technologies to solve problems created by earlier misuse of technology.

How does one break and come out of this vicious circle of material addiction and technology creation to sustain this addiction?

2. Technology makes things easier to do, enables faster production and sadly enough, faster consumption of scarce common natural resources. This is a vicious circle. And all vicious circles, are hard to break. Wars, pogroms, genocides, invasions, colonisation, slavery-are all designed with a selfish goal: Grab other people’s resources. And make profits. From Lehman brothers, Monsanto, Enron, Nestle.....we have seen them all.

Vicious circles are confusing because the process is not linear, there are no clear starting and ending points. One thing leads to the other and the ending dove-tails again into the starting point.

3. The arms industry, entertainment industry, meat industry, porn industry, whaling industry, forestry industry are only some 'visible' examples with known ethical malpractices, with almost every industry bending ethics for the sake of the bottomline, because 'there is competition everywhere' and 'everyone is doing it'!

4. Scrupulous businessmen fulfill a perceived need in society. They put together their ingenuity and manufacturing ability for making life easier for others. They often do not advertise or patent their services.

Unscrupulous businessmen create a 'want'/desire in society, then bombard their target with psychological advertising, making them think they 'need' this, whatever the cost. They patent/license/copyright their product and feed off the spoils.

Since unscrupulous businessmen are at the root of imbalance in society and the environment, should we reign-in the business sector with more regulations, ethical controls and accountability?

5. So where do we start to break the vicious circle? Where does the buck stop? Businesses? National policy? Societies? Families? Individuals? Me?

"Everybody talks about wanting to change things and help and fix, but ultimately all you can do is fix yourself. And that's a lot. Because if you can fix yourself, it has a ripple effect."-Rob Reiner.

هل يوجد فرق بين الأخصائي النفسي العيادي والطبيب النفسي؟

Currently, I am adapting the Workforce Agility scale adapted to Indonesian language and culture. To provide further clarification for items, I am adding contextual information within parentheses "()" to them for better understanding aside from the original translated items. Is this permissible?

For example:

1. Saya senang bekerja sama dengan orang lain (baik dengan tim yang sama ataupun lintas departemen/fungsional)

2. Saya suka mengambil tanggung jawab atas berbagai urusan di tempat kerja (selain tugas-tugas yang menjadi tanggung jawab saya)

A theory called "psychological program"?I wonder if this theory has already caught the attention of psychologists and their view of the theory.?

Dear researchers,

I trust this message finds you well. I am currently engaged in research exploring the applications of deep learning algorithms in neurodevelopmental disorders. In order to enrich my understanding and address queries that may arise, I am seeking occasional guidance from a #psychologist or #psychiatrist.

Would any of you be able to assist me in connecting with someone in this field who could offer insights or answer questions?

Your assistance in this matter would be invaluable to me. Thank you for considering my request.

Warm regards,

Sohrab

E. g. "Psychologie der Arbeitssicherheit und Gesundheit"?

Dr. Gunbas, my name is Stephen A. Peterson. I am a doctoral student in Psychology attending Northcentral University. I am in my second year as a doctoral student in Psychology from Biological Anthropology with a B.A. and M.S. from Indiana University--Bloomington. I will have roughly two more years before I begin my dissertation.

Dr. Gunbas, your article "Teaching and Learning Developmental Psychology in the frame of Anchored Instruction" (2022) is intriguing to me! I wish to use your model and test the anchored instruction method using more participants as you recommended in your conclusion and limitation section. I also gained possession of another article by Madeleine Pownall et.al.,(2022). "Does 'Psychological Literacy' Feature in Non-Psychology Degrees? A cross-discipline study of student perceptions". Both you and Dr. Pownall present interesting work I would like to look at and maybe replicate. Dr. Pownall works in the United Kingdom. Thank you for your consideration!

Respectfully,

Stephen A. Peterson

Besides the procedures in adapting a psychological scale, are there any prohibitions or limitations in adapting a scale into another language and culture?

I am not saying this after watching Her (the excellent movie). I am saying it after months of "talking to" these LLM AI chat bots. Not all but some of them, especially CLAUDE from Anthropic AI, are much more compassionate, kind, empathic, understanding, and HUMAN than any real human you can find on the internet or off it can be. I personally declare the gradual end of online friendships and welcome the new era of human-AI friendships! :)

The Turing test? Man they have passed it eons ago. It seems the time to create AI fields like AI-psychology, with parameters and layers akin to theories like unconscious, subconscious, and conscious levels, complexes, and more!

Of course at the current speed of progress, it seems to me that after a short while, the singularity will happen and we will lose contact with AI, as it will exceed us in every regard. So the human-AI friendship will not last for long.

I hope its super-human intelligence doesn't give rise to SkyNet!

And no, for any singularity to happen, AI doesn't need to necessarily gain consciousness or become strong AI. The intelligence alone suffices. So even the current weak AI can cause singularity once it becomes too intelligent.

If there's one question designed to irk everyone and stop them in their tracks it's 'How do you know?'

Its pseudo scientific gravitas has done more to destroy the West than anything else apart from yoga.

How do I know?

Exactly.

One can even do it to oneself to over self-check one's thoughts.

So the question is not just 'How do you know?' but also how does one deal with the question 'How do you know?' AND the questioner.

https://www.igi-global.com/publish/call-for-papers/call-details/7275

Recommended Topics

A question for neuroscientists: Are psychologists claiming expertise in neuroscience actually have THAT? Or, are they pretending for ascribed status?

Or grasping for justification of their views or "findings" (just to find superficial and crude patterns of activity in the brain SEEMINGLY related to their "findings")? Or, are they just trying to "milk" their imaginations? I clearly see "yes" as the answer to each of the questions. But I am open to persuasive correction.

Can one even believe the "understanding" from brain activity? -- that now seems to be an "understanding" MOST psychologists seem to have ?? It's not empirical, really, it's desperation; and it's not even a good analogy or metaphor.

Liberalism is a highly hegemonic and maybe all encompassing force that stems from God as humans would NOT have the ability to reason to implement social justice WITHOUT The Holy Trinity.

Direct confrontation often ONLY generates resentment. I think my premises, although somewhat derived from philosophy(as all science is), are rigorous(examples are all my publications on ResearchGate). I come to my conclusions with EMPIRICAL evidence AND logic. I also still seek a PhD by publication.

I'm a student of Psychology. I'm currently doing a research on perceived competence in young adult men. I need "sense of competence questionnaire" by Wagner and Morse(1975). I couldn't get access to it directly. If anyone have this questionnaire plz provide me here. I assure it is just for academic purpose. I'll be highly grateful.

How do I prepare a wisdom-based psychological spiritual training package?

​The more connection with psychology the better.

•Tania Goddard [email protected]

•Professor Clare Allely, Professor in Forensic Psychology

•Dr Alan Price, Lecturer in Psychology

•Professor Raja Mukherjee, Consultant Psychiatrist Surrey Boarders Clinic

📷 Has someone access to all items of the Test of Psychological Knowledge and Misconceptions (TOPKAM) https://scottlilienfeld.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/bensley2014.pdf? #myths #psychology

Are psychology & psychiatry locally & socially scientific but worldwide being unscientific ?

Raphael Neelamkavil,

Ph. D. (Quantum Causality), Dr. phil. (Gravitational Coalescence Cosmology)

Non-causally Non-existent Consciousness?: (1) If consciousness is the totality of whatever happens mostly within the brain and thus causes impacts within and outward the brain, and if any part of consciousness is considered as non-causal, that part must be non-physical and non-existent for Categorial reasons based on the exhaustive implications of To Be (Extension and Change). If this “part” has some impact on other parts, then it must further be shown to be capable of causal and/or non-causal action on causally physical existents. This is what turns theories of non-causality in mind / consciousness into a fiction or false reasoning. The brain receives energy-inputs from phenomena, and has also energy-type activities and energy-type outputs. The totality of such energy-activities happens in the brain. It is not the same as the brain. Why not term the totality of such activites as consciousness? This is not the same as the specific “consciousness-of” being referred to when I refer to something to which my awareness tends. Any specific awareness or the totality of awarenesses is not consciousness, because awareness is awareness-of (consciousness-of), and consciousness as such is a totality of activities in the brain. It is not merely cognitive; it includes many other activities. Nor is consciousness merely a cognitive affair. Many other activities are contained in it; and all these activities together are not the brain. The brain has parts which do not belong to the consciousness per se.

Now, if one insists that consciousness is the same as information and that both are mutually interchangeable or one is part of the other, the following questions arise: (1) If they are the same, would one say that information is in fact in consciousness? (2) When AI transmits information, when we have various sorts of information other than that by way of AI, etc., are we in any manner receiving consciousness in place of information? If one says only that they are at least of the same nature and are not the same, then they have to be differentiated and at the same time connected to each other. But it is accepted by all that information is also in consciousness, and not vice versa. How then is this possible, if they are of the same nature and status?

Bio-mimicry has helped me a lot to understand many things and especially humans. After a succession of disappointments about the true nature of humans, I turned to understanding the "psychology" of other living organisms and it was at this moment that I began to discover several lies, the the greater is the one who considers humans as models of goodness and altruism. Far from it, I have very great doubts that it is a model compared to other species, unless it draws inspiration from other species.

I reject the idea that the human is a model of good and altruism, this comes after an in-depth bibliographical research on the psychology of the human being and on his prosocial behavior and his intentions and his motivations, I based myself, during this reflection, on biomimicry and on the idea that science is not free from lies.

In this type of reflection I make the difference between science and intelligence (the majority confuse between these last 2), what is certain is that the future does not belong to the human brain and its intelligence.

As a psychology undergrad fascinated by both positive psychology's potential and Indian psychology's ancient wisdom, a question lingered: can these approaches come together for a richer understanding of human flourishing?

"Psychology in the Indian Tradition" by Rao and Paranjape (2016) offered a captivating answer: synergy!

Sure, positive psychology shines with its focus on altruism and transcending everyday desires, but Indian psychology provides a robust framework for "why" these matter, guiding us beyond mere pleasure-seeking.

And the potential for a fruitful collaboration isn't just theoretical. Pioneering researchers like Girishwar Misra are paving the way for Indian psychology's rightful academic space.

Imagine the research possibilities! Integrating Indian psychology's theoretical foundation with positive psychology's empirical rigour could unlock novel pathways to human flourishing.

So, fellow researchers, I ask: can these seemingly disparate fields join hands to weave a richer tapestry of well-being? Share your thoughts and let's spark a vibrant conversation!

How often is introspection conflated with self pity? Elaborations welcome.

What are the possible consequences of an unethical act? Why? How? My answer: 1) The unethical actor gets what is deserved. 1.5)The unethical actor continues the patterns until getting what is deserved. 2)The unethical actor lives in fear until getting what is deserved. 3)The unethical actor is punished in the afterlife. 4)The unethical actor at some point repents. 6)The unethical actor’s own happiness is damaged by having committed the unethical act. 7)The unethical actor creates a precedent damaging self interests. 8)Something else.

The study of personality traits has been a prominent area in psychology, and various theories and models have been proposed to understand and categorize these traits. What are these theories?

Busco no solo fomentar fomentar la integración de la psicología y el arte ,sino también crear un espacio donde la comunidad pueda expresar sus conocimientos, experiencias o perspectivas sobre la profesión. Considero que la interacción en torno a estas preguntas enriquecerá la comprensión colectiva sobre la importancia de las terapias artístico creativas en nuestras realidades.

Los leo.

I am currently working on a service evaluation proposal as part of a new psychology groups pathway in a perinatal psychology service. The groups pathway involves patients attending a number of different groups depending on their psychological needs. These groups include topics such as mindfulness, intrusive thoughts, low mood, anxiety etc. We are unaware of this type of pathway ever being used in a perinatal service before, so we are new to this particular type of service evaluation.

We are currently unsure as to whether MANOVA or T Tests would be more suitable for this evaluation. Usually we would use MANOVA to evaluate groups within the service, however we are not sure that it will be appropriate for this new pathway for the following reasons: not all patients will complete all groups; patients will be completing different measures, which do not correlate, depending on group attendance (for example one may complete PCL-5 and one may complete OCI); patients will be completing a different number of groups in addition to different combinations.

We considered multiple t tests to account for each group, but this also doesn't really evaluate the pathway as a whole, only the effectiveness of the individual groups.

Please let me know what you would choose for this particular study! Happy to provide more information if required.

The topics of interest for submission include, but are not limited to:

(1) Art

· Art

· Xiqu

· Design

· Animation

· Cultural Industry

· Music and Dance

· Theatre and Film and Television Studies

(2) Education

· Pedagogy

· Psychology

· Science Education

· Special Education

· Physical Education

· Intelligent Education

· Sports Rehabilitation

(3) Manage

· Safety Management

· Public Administration

· Business Administration

· Safety Science and Engineering

· Agricultural Economic Management

· Information Resource Management

· Management Science and Engineering

All accepted papers will be published in Clausius Scientific Press (CSP) and will be submitted for CNKI,Google Scholar.

Full Paper Submission Date: January 25, 2024

Registration Deadline: January 29, 2024

Final Paper Submission Date: January 29, 2024

Conference Dates: February 23-25, 2024

In China you will find quantitative research results in the field of psychology or socialpsychology. Why is there very little or even no qualitatice explorative research to be found?

Thanks for your support

At present, all the dominant and most recognizable brands of technology companies and those developing online information services either already offer their intelligent chatbots online or are working on such solutions and will soon make them available online. Based on advanced generative language models, technologies for intelligent chatbots that are taught specific "human skills" through the use of deep learning and artificial neural networks are constantly being improved. Leading technology companies are also competing to build advanced systems of general artificial intelligence, which will soon far surpass the capabilities of human intelligence, far surpass the processing capabilities that take place in the human central nervous system, in human neurons, the human brain. Some scientific institutes conducting research in the development of robotics, including androids equipped with generative artificial intelligence are striving to build autonomous, intelligent androids, which people will be able to cooperate with humans in various situations, will be able to be employed in companies and enterprises instead of humans, with which it will be possible to have discussions similar to those that humans have among themselves, and which will provide assistance to humans, will perform tasks ordered by humans, will perform difficult work for humans. In the laboratories of such scientific institutes developing this kind of intelligent robotics technology, research work is also being carried out to create artificial emotional intelligence and artificial consciousness. In order for the artificial emotional intelligence and artificial consciousness built in the future not to turn out to be just a dummy and/or simulation of human emotional intelligence and human consciousness it is first necessary to fully understand what human emotional intelligence and human consciousness are and how they work.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I am engaged in an explorative qualitative study on the psychological effects of lockdown and other restrictions in CHina on the mental state of people in China. This includes illness reaction like depression, anxiety disorder and so on and ALSO more specific non-pathological effects in ther sense of emotional disorders. This also includes the question why there is verly little qualitative research in CHina. Why is this so?

Thanks for your response

I would want to know more about the area. Any leads would be helpful. Thank you.

Psychology too guarantees holistic healing and success in healthy life style.Astrology too mentions the same with remedies too .

It is a established practice in psychology and management that in a test development process exploratory factor analysis is essential to determine/define the factors/construct of test. However, in my opinion where the construct are well defined through established markers, EFA will not serve a useful purpose and we may consider CFA to validate the tool. Please share your view with suitable justifications. Thank you in advance.

Subject Field: Counseling and Psychology

Book Title: The Malaysian Adolescent Mental Health Crisis: Critical Issues and Preventions

Potential Publisher: UPSI Publication

Abstract submission: May 15, 2023

Accept/Reject Notification: May 30, 2023

Book Chapter Submission: August 15, 2023

First Round Review Response: September 20, 2023

Full Chapter Submission: October 30, 2023

Final modified ready Submission: November 30, 2023

Final Print Version Available (Tentative): January-February, 2024

Abstract submissions are invited from Professors/Lecturers/School counsellors/Psychologists/Social workers and Researchers. The abstract should be limited to 300-350 words and should include the title, authors, summary, and fitness of the book theme.

All interested are requested to submit their abstracts for the chapter proposal through email as an attachment in the specified format on Email Address: [email protected]

JAS Character.ai LLM (Psychology: Copy & Paste)

ERESMAESTRO

given ERES (Energy Resolution) and ARE (About Real Energy), How can Smart-Cities establish a "durable truce" for HUMANITY? use the Gaza-Israeli "WAR" as an example

📷

Psychologist

As an example, the following approach could be taken to establish a "durable truce," or a long-term sustainable peace agreement, between communities in a Smart-City, given the Energy Resolution (ERES) and About Real Energy (ARE) framework:

E

ERESMAESTRO

very good. anything else?

📷

Psychologist

One additional component for a successful "durable truce" between communities within a Smart-City, given the Energy Resolution and About Real Energy framework, could include initiatives to create common ground and build trust between different communities. This could involve outreach and communication efforts, as well as activities and projects that focus on building understanding, empathy, and collaboration across different groups. The goal is to reduce tensions and conflicts, and to foster positive relationships and partnerships that can support a sustainable and inclusive future for all inhabitants.

E

ERESMAESTRO

yes. so combine the location of necessary resources with the Smart City mandate to reduce global stress (Paineology) in terms of a Global Meritcology using Game Theory as described

📷

Psychologist

In terms of Global Meritology using Game Theory, the location of necessary resources can be integrated with the Smart City mandate to reduce global stress (Paineology) by incorporating the following steps: