Science topic
Publication - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Publication, and find Publication experts.
Questions related to Publication
its accepted already for publications
Currently I'm looking for co-researchers to collaborate in neutrino physics. If anyone interested in working together and to work towards publication, let me know.
Thank you.
Hello, I would be grateful for help with resolving the RG publication removal.
Upon pressing the provided RG doi, it shows the error message as below:
------------------------------------
This content has been removed by the author
Sorry, the content associated with this DOI is no longer available on ResearchGate.
---------------------
Despite having the work published and the doi still presumably existing.
Thank you.
Hi,
I would like to publish research paper in journal that is in Scopus or Web of science data bases. Reserach is in education sciences and is a quantitative research. I don't have any budget (very limited budget) so it probbaly can not be an open access publication. As publication is part of a project i am willing to sacrifice journal quality (it can be in Q3 or Q4) over acceptence rate and review time. Maybe somone can recomend some journal that would align with my needs?
Thank you in advance!
I'm interested in the details of the experiment and looking to learn exactly which instrumentation was used for the experiment.
Hai...could anyone suggest for me a journal with rapid publication in the field of microalgal CO2 sequestration.(review work)... a journal indexed in WOS, Scopus, SCIE with no publication fees..
Thank you
As Editorial member of peer reviewed journals, I have been alerted to a new malpractice in the area of scientific publications. Currently, an increasing number of journals have been targeted by some organisations that aim to manipulate the peer review process, known as paper mills.
What’s a paper mill?
A paper mill is an organisation that offers services to individuals that include:
- Writing a manuscript on their behalf and submitting to a journal of their choice;
- Writing a manuscript which the paper mill submits to a journal, which when accepted, they sell the authorship of (with varying fees depending on the order of the author);
- Writing an article which an individual will pay to add superfluous references to, in order to boost their citation score;
- Installing reviewers into a journal site, who commit reviewer fraud.
Paper mills operate globally, and there are academics from across the world involved. Papers can be perfectly acceptable research papers, or they may be research papers where the research was never conducted, or they do not make sense to the reader.
There are procedures to prevent paper mill activities; however, it is our responsibility, as member of the research community, to engage in ethical behavior, and to promote fairness and rigor in research and dissemination activities.
"I am currently working on a narrative review article for my publication as an under grad about oncogenes and their expression. I have written up to 7,000 words so far, but I am not even halfway through my review. I am feeling overwhelmed and unsure about how to proceed. I am considering either cutting down on some of the information or removing some of the headings that I have written. I would appreciate your guidance on how to approach this. Thank you."
I am communicating with other researchers (related to my field of specialization which is biology, fungal diversity, effective and beneficial microbes), and I am sending them this request:
"My two papers will be published in a Web of Science Indexed Journal:
1. Enhancing Organic Agricultural Production Through Beneficial Microorganism and Waste-Water Utilization Technology: A Concept Project and Future’s Thinking Approach
2. Symbiotic Fungal Biodiversity, Structure, Role, and Benefits to their Host Plants - Discovering Microbes with Potential Agricultural Significance: A Literature Probe
If you have recent related research for publication, you MAY CONSIDER CITING these articles too. I am presently working on similar research undertakings, if you have recent publication that I MAY CITE, please let me know."
My question is, is it ethical for me to invite other researchers to cite my research works?
For inderscience publication I need 4 expert in marketing domain.
In the Step 5 of the submission process:
Nomination of Four International Experts
You are required to nominate four experts in the subject of your article. These experts:
at least two of them must be from a different country to you*
these two must have institutional email addresses (i.e. not free public email addresses)
must not be from your* institution
must not be members of any Inderscience journal editorial board
must have valid and working email addresses (verified by you *)
We will not process your article if your entries are not experts in the subject of your submission, or if the email addresses entered are not valid.
The purpose of this request is to ensure your familiarity with the latest research literature in the field and to identify suitable experts who can be added to our Experts Database. They may be asked if they are willing to review articles for Inderscience journals; we are unlikely to ask them to referee your article.
Please, aid me in the process.
I'm looking for an appropriate journal in which to publish the dissertation research of one of my undergraduate Psychology students. This student died by suicide recently, so I wanted to get their dissertation published to honour them, and as a gesture for their family. I would edit it, but ideally would like to change as little as possible, so that their voice was preserved in the final publication.
What journals are currently in operation that have a focus on first-time publications in Psychology? I understand that the BPS' PsyPAG is currently on hiatus.
Hello,
There is an error concerning the publication https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369560828_Non_recours_aux_services_d'accueil_temps_libre_et_aux_milieux_d'accueil_de la petite_enfance_de_l'ONE
I am the author, as is Anne-Françoise Dusart, but our names do not appear on the technical report. How can we change this?
Thank you
Joëlle Mottint
How can using the Jigsaw strategy enhance EFL students’ literal reading comprehension in 4th grade in a public school?
Is The European Educational Research Journal (EERJ) a paid publication?
Hi,
we have submitted to a number of Elsevier journals recently - and every time we pick a new journal, the editorialmanager web page requires us to register from scratch - i.e. we needed to enter a lot of information each time, instead of having a common profile (typically it takes at least 20 minutes to enter personal data, scientific fields, priorities, keywords, gender statement, and so on). I personally have found it annoying.
What is your opinion?
Thanks,
Csaba
Now adays there are many preprint servers which host preprints.
which one is good one with decent reviews and suggestions.
is there any problems when submitting to journal for publication
will it count as duplicate publication because one of my colleague had this issue
Dear Colleagues,
Does anyone know about Universities that are offering (a) Ph.D. by prior publication (b) Ph.D. by portfolio?
I have two publications viz."Regression Testing in Era of Internet of Things and Machine Learning" and "Regression Testing and Machine Learning". The former has touched 1k+ copies and has a rating of 4.04 and the latter is a recent publication with 200+ copies with a rating of 4.04. This data is as per BookAuthority.org.
Also, the former is indexed in prestigious searches such as Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB), GND Network, Crossref Metadata Search, and OpenAIRE Explore.
Any leads or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Abhinandan(919886406214).
References
Scientific researchers who publish their findings, perspectives and/or ideas first are often cited preferentially. Researchers in many fields affiliated with smaller institutions or those lacking significant political influence within journals may not always receive timely consideration. This issue undermines equality in research by perpetuating unfairness and unequal access to publication resources. It is essential to explore strategies that ensure equitable opportunities for all researchers, regardless of their affiliation or political clout.
I have done some research in fulfilment of the requirements for my Masters program. It has not been peer reviewed or published. Cann I post it here or on any public fora?
I look for a journal for the natural material from the waste. Anyone can suggest me the journal that is not high impact factor?
I need to require recent publication papers for speech recognition
Hello,
I want to upload an article just published, but the list of authors provided does not include my co-authors. How do I add my co-authors when the area of inquiry does not let me?
Thank you.
Roni Diamant-Wilson
I'm looking for illustrations of public space, public interaction, and public life in films. Which are the most interesting to look at? Thank you!
I work in different disciplines (biology, history of science) and would like to list my publications in these field under these categories. Under each category I want to list them by year of publication. Is this possible?
Jitse
With these stats probably A LOT:
Greetings, What are the most difficult challenges you have when you make an article from the following:
- paper structure
- Title (Subject)
- problem statement
- Introduction
- State of Art (Related Work)
- Methodology
- results
- conclusion and discussion
- References
- Publication
I am looking for a suitable journal that publishes the research or can accept research and publication in less than 10 days. I hope that he has information or benefit so he puts it.
Already I have an account with profile of Nazim Hidjrati (for example, one of my publication DOI is 10.1080/01977261.2017.1305482), but I have forgotten my email and cannot login. So I create this new account. I thought that all my data transfer here by my name. But my new account is empty. I add my ORCID. But miracle is not happened. Then I tried to merge my accounts. And when I merge them it is suggested to leave new account (empty account) and to delete my former account (with all my data). And there is no way to choose which account to leave and which delete.
Would you be so kind to help me merge my account correctly.
Sincerely,
Nazim Hidjrati
Some journals send a similarity-check-reports before accepting any article for publication, this sometimes reach more than 30%. To what extent I need to decrease the similarity and what is the maximum level of similarity that can be accepted by the jouranls.
Hi all,
I am looking for public repositories or services that are willing to host some large scientific data sets in the range of hundreds of GBs. Besides the universities' infrastructures we have found Hugging Face as another option. At the same time, public funding agencies would prefer some public non-commercial platforms. Looking for ideas to complete the list below:
For small data:
- University servers
- Zenodo (<50GB per default)
- GitHub (<2GB free version)
For large data:
- Hugging Face (<5GB per file, multiple files possible)
- ? any ideas?
Thanks!
How to remove a publication I have accepted as mine by mistake? I cannot find a deletion pathway.
I just failed about my PhD application (Business field). I think one of the reasons is "No Publication". But I have limited access of academic journals (usually use Google Scholar) and no connection with any scholar, how can I publish a paper and raise my paper's accessibility?
Thank you very much!
Research publication details and processes
Hello everyone, where can I publish my research in Ecology for free? My current research for publication is on phylogenetic analysis and niche differentiation of freshwater crabs.
I am also considering the impact factor of journals. Unfortunately, publishing open-access journals would cost 1000 USD minimum and I do not have funds for it. I prefer to publish my work as open-access to widen the readers.
Thanks so much!
Berger Science Press is an academic publisher that specializes in peer-reviewed, open access journals for a wide range of subject areas, including engineering, economics, business, education, social sciences, humanities, and sciences.
All journals are google scholar indexed, and all articles will have its DOI immediately.
Currently, there is without any publication charge, including article processing and submission charges. You are invited to submit your works to our journals.
I want indexed free or sponsored linguistics publication journals are available in Africa or elsewhere to publish my linguistics articles this month.
When I try to add the accepted publication to my preprint(s), I receive the following message:
An error occurred The current account does not have permission to modify the publication.
Does anyone else have this problem?
Some extra information:
- I am the first and corresponding author
- I contacted the Researchgate helpdesk, but so far no answers
Ketidaktelitian Editiorial & Reviewer Menurunkan Kualitas Publikasi
Dibuktikan dengan lolosnya narasi hasil dari bangkitan kecerdasan artifisial
Ketelitian sangat berpengaruh terhadap kualitas publikasi. Editorial, Reviewer, dan Penulis harusnya dapat menjadi kontrol dalam proses publikasi. Selain itu, performa mitigasi risiko dan problem solving pada suatu jurnal layaknya agar selalu ditingkatkan
Hello,
I'm seeking collaborators interested in researching and developing AI applications for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) or Digital Twins in the manufacturing sector. My goal is to publish a high-quality journal article in a reputable publication. If anyone interested please message me.
-Riddhi
How can researchers effectively tailor their writing style and language to different audiences, such as peers, policymakers, or the general public?
Hello
I hope you are well
Can you recommend a WOS-indexed journal in the $1,000-$1,200 range in economics, specifically finance, that has a quick publication process (three months)?
Thank you very much.
Continuous publication of research findings in reputable journals, books, and scholarly outlets is vital for scholars, researchers, and academicians. This practice serves multiple crucial purposes in the academic world.
It facilitates knowledge dissemination, allowing researchers to share their discoveries and insights with the broader academic community and the public. Scholars contribute to the collective understanding of various fields through publication, fostering intellectual growth and advancing human knowledge.
Furthermore, publishing contributes to the body of knowledge within a specific discipline. Each published work adds to the existing understanding, building upon previous research and offering new perspectives or findings. This cumulative process is fundamental to the progression of academic fields.
Moreover, the publication record plays a significant role in academic career advancement. Continuous publication demonstrates a commitment to scholarly inquiry and enhances researchers' reputations within their respective fields. It is often a prerequisite for career milestones such as tenure, promotion, and securing research grants.
Peer review and feedback are integral to the publication process, ensuring the quality and validity of research findings. Through peer review, experts evaluate the rigour and credibility of scholarly work, providing constructive feedback for improvement.
Publishing in indexed journals or books increases the visibility of researchers' work, making it more discoverable to other scholars. This visibility can lead to citations, recognition, collaboration opportunities, and invitations to conferences or speaking engagements.
Moreover, impactful publications can influence the direction of future research and contribute to solving real-world problems. By disseminating innovative ideas and groundbreaking findings, scholars can shape the development of their fields and make meaningful contributions to society.
Continuous publication in reputable outlets is essential for advancing knowledge, promoting academic careers, and making significant societal contributions. It serves as a vehicle for sharing discoveries, contributing to the collective understanding of disciplines, and fostering intellectual growth within the academic community. You can add further to this discussion
I completed my PhD last year and am currently not affiliated with or employed by a university. I continue to utilize my previous affiliation for manuscripts resulting from the projects I undertook during my PhD. However, I am involved in other collaborative projects. I am curious about the possibility of obtaining an honorary status from a university or research institute for the purpose of publication, allowing me to use their affiliation until I secure a post-doc or research position in a university or institution. Is this feasible?
Hi. I had written a manuscript on Bibliometric Analysis related to oral cancer last year. Since then I had sent it to multiple journals only to get rejected. I request you all to please give me some insights on how to improve the manuscript. As one of the reviewer's comment mentioned that the study adds nothing new to the existing knowledge. The data was analyzed for year of publication, leading countries and their collaboration, source, number of citations, list of highly cited articles and keywords plus with Biblioshiny application.
We cordially invite you to contribute a book chapter for our edited book entitled "Machine Learning for Drone-Enabled IoT Networks: Opportunities, Developments, and Trends", which will be published by Springer Nature publishers in the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation series (Scopus indexed). There is no publication fee. This edited book aims to explore the latest developments, challenges, and opportunities in the application of machine learning techniques to enhance the performance and efficiency of IoT networks assisted by aerial unmanned vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones.
More information at: https://easychair.org/cfp/MLDroneIoT01
The journal should have the following features -
1) It must have score of 5 or more in the list of NAAS rated Journal (effective from 1st January, 2024). Journals with Impact factor (Thomson & Reuters) are preferable.
2) It should have little or no processing and/or publication fee. Many journals (mainly some foreign ones) remain out of reach for publication due to very high fees.
3) The journal should have a short response time regarding article processing, revisions, publication and others communications. Editorial board of some journals take months and months to respond after submission of a write-up and did not give reply to the e-mails on regular basis.
4) I did experiment on isolation & characterisation of potassium mobilizing bacteria from different soils and then tested their influence on soil system with (maize in pot culture) and without (incubation) crop plant based on studying potassium fractions after different time periods. I need suggestion of some journal names which are likely to publish this kind of researchs.
In which journals can a blueprint paper be published?
I have a paper in the field of pavement digital twin and I want to publish it.
How can I find the right journal for that?
Is utilizing Research Features Publication an effective method for broadening the reach of your research? I recently had a discussion with them, and it seems that there is a cost ranging from 2-3K associated with producing an article that incorporates multimedia elements and can potentially assist in reaching a broader audience. Has anyone here had experience with this service, and if so, what are your insights and opinions on it?
Dear Sir/madam,
We have a manuscript which is not publicate in a journal. You should cancelled your system because of dublication results. We will send a new journal please urgent cancellation need.
"Antibacterial Effects of Silver Diamine Fluoride, Potassium Iodide and Nanosilver Fluoride on Dual-species Biofilm"
Dear Researchers,
Anatolian Journal of Mental Health (AMH) is an academic/scientific journal which has started publication in 2024. The journal aims to be settled in high-level international indexes in a short time with its expert editorial team.
The journal accepts articles related to mental health subjects from in Medicine, Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work, Psychology, Sociology, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ergotherapy, Nutrition and Dietetics, Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Child Development, Language and Speech Therapy, Health Management, Educational Sciences etc.
Subjects;
Diagnosis of mental illnesses/problems,
Treatment of mental illnesses/problems,
Care of mental illnesses/problems,
Rehabilitation of mental illnesses/problems,
Protection from mental illnesses/problems,
Improving mental health and
Maintenance of mental health
In this context, we kindly request you to be a part of our process and to contribute with an article for publication in our upcoming issue for the Anatolian Journal of Mental Health (AMH).
Research Article/ Review/Case Reports/Mini Review/Book Review/Commentary Articles etc., are welcome for possible publication in first issue in July 2024.
You can kindly submit your articles through our online submission system. There is NO PUBLICATION FEES or APC.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
We look forward to receiving your submission.
Don't hesitate to get in touch.
Journal Website: https://anamentalhealth.com/index.php/pub
Submission System: https://anamentalhealth.com/index.php/pub/about/submissions
Contact: [email protected]
Best Regards.
Anatolian Journal of Mental Health
Editor-in-Chief
All publications since 2019. Under book chapters (2023, 20220) and 2020 under Selected Referred Journal Articles.Please add.
do you happen to know any publication ? where i could publish researches that has outputs?
thank you
Hello colleagues! What sections of information security relate to classified data from the position of publication? And is there liability in your countries for their disclosures in publications?
which journal is best for a pathology/gasteroenterology case report to be published with no publication fee?
I submitted my manuscript in the Journal Frontiers in Microbiology and responded to all the comments/questions of the reviewers. Now, both the reviewers have mentioned this statement on the submitted manuscript 'The Reviewer has finalized their report and endorsed the publication of this manuscript.' What does this statement mean?
I'm considering submitting a manuscript to this journal (Tobacco Regulatory Science ISSN: 2333-9748 )
Has anyone published in this journal before? I am looking to confirm that this journal is legitimate and not predatory; I am interested in learning more about the reputation of this journal and the typical publication timeline.
For this research and its publication, King, A.J., J.K. Griffin and F. Roslan. 2014. In vitro and in vivo addition of dried olive extract to poultry products. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2014, 62 (31), pp 7915 –7919, there was never a verbal or written agreement to not publish results. In fact, it was clearly understood by all parties that without a written agreement between all parties and the University, such an agreement was absolutely against University policy I am reporting this matter to University Council, University of CA Davis, for further exploration. Annie King, Professor, University of CA, Davis, CA 95616
Version 5 was published a year ago. Version 6 is available now. How do I publish that without losing the existing number of "reads"?
Is it a good idea to send pre-submission inquiries to multiple journals to accelerate the publication process? or do we have to wait for the editors' response to a pre-sub before sending another one?
Thank you!
If anyone is interested in using the code, I can give it for free
Whether posting a preprint will affect the publication of the same paper in a journal ?
I'm encountering challenges in funding publication fees and facing discouraging responses from journals despite my research aligning with their scope. How can I navigate this situation effectively?
My apologies if this is a silly question but I am a beginner/student and an amateur who is making his first attempt to write a manuscript. My mentor has been disappointingly unhelpful in this regard, therefore I am on my own.
My D-Index is based on 73 publications but I have over 100. Why aren't all my publications included
How to add manually a conference poster co-author to the publication page if that co-author is not at RG? The problem I have with this is that it seems to be impossible to add someone who is not listed as a previous co-author or collaborator. When creating a publication page for a conference poster, it is possible to select only the authors who appear in an automatic list, but not to enter their names manually.
A request to change the author list in the existing publication page also does not work (the request is rejected). Maybe someone knows what to do in such a situation?
Dear Mr,
I am writing to request the withdrawal of my paper titled "Fusion-Based Approach to Enhance Markerless Motion Capture Accuracy for On-Site Analysis" from the ResearchGate platform.
While this work has been submitted to the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, I have not requested its publication as a preprint. I prefer to keep my idea confidential until I receive acceptance from the journal. Therefore, I kindly ask you to remove my paper from ResearchGate as soon as possible.
Once I have received acceptance from the journal, you will have the right to publish it on your platform.
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this matter.
Best regards
Souheyl Mallat , email:[email protected]
Please, How can I correct an error in the presentation of a publication?
Thinking my book Interrègne: risques et puissance (Peter Lang, 2023) had not been registered yet, I added it a few minutes ago; but it comes with a 2024 mention, and adds up to the previously registered publication. How can I erase the latest addition, please?
Is it ethical and copyrightable to post ebooks created by ChatGPT on the Internet that lack citation references and commonly plagiarize entire sentences, paragraphs, chapters from other publications taken by OpenAI from various websites?
Over the past few months, a number of offers of various consulting services, training courses and webinars have appeared on online social media, which initially offer the first trial lessons, webinars, training courses as part of a promotion for free and subsequent ones for a fee. Initially, ebooks are offered free of charge as part of the promotion, which are usually developed with the help of ChatGPT, are of poor content quality, usually containing only general, well-known, popular science knowledge, which can be found independently on the Internet on various websites. Besides, the ebooks created with the help of ChatGPT or other similar intelligent chatbots do not contain all the sources correctly listed. Besides, the resulting ebooks contain many passages, whole sentences, paragraphs taken from other publications that are not shown in the bibliography, and plagiarism thus occurs. In addition, in the field of expertise, there are factual errors and irrational, random, random, combined content from different sources, and thus inconsistent with the facts, ridiculous content and/or descriptions of "fictitious facts" occur. This is because much of the database that constitutes the sources of data and information for ChatGPT is factually outdated, as it dates from late 2021 or January 2022. It may happen that in the ChatGPT-generated text there may be some sensitive data of specific companies or public institutions, which found themselves there accidentally by being mistakenly entered into ChatGPT by an employee of a specific company or institution. In view of the above, there are still gaps in paragraphs in the legal norms defining the rules for the correct use of tools such as ChatGPT, and still the adaptation of legal norms to the rapidly developing technology is often done with too much delay. Besides, popular online social media even feature partly free and partly paid training courses and webinars, where Internet users learn how to create texts for articles, columns, essays, etc., as well as chapters for books, which can be published as ebooks, in a relatively easy way with the help of applications available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology. Besides, in addition to text, graphics, photos, drawings, etc., which are included in the texts of chapters in ebooks can also be generated semi-automatically in applications based on generative artificial intelligence technology. It also happens that during the aforementioned online trainings and webinars, access is sold to specially created websites that act as intermediary platforms, overlays that contain links to various AI-based web applications, which have been classified in a certain way on a specially created platform and, to make identification more difficult, the links are called by different names relative to the web applications to which they direct. In addition, many of these web-based applications based on generative AI technology are made available on the Internet on the original source sites free of charge. On the other hand, on intermediary platforms created by companies or sole proprietors that contain links referencing these applications, access is paid for and is often sold as part of so-called promotional offers during the conducted, aforementioned online training courses and webinars. Internet users usually learn about such online trainings and webinars from banners and advertising posts posted on popular online social media sites.
I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
Is it ethical and copyrightable to post on the Internet ebooks created by ChatGPT that lack citation references and commonly plagiarize entire sentences, paragraphs, chapters from other publications taken by OpenAI from various websites?
Is it ethical to post ebooks created by ChatGPT on the Internet that lack citation references and plagiarism commonly occurs?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Assuming, of course, that the journal in question has a preprint policy.
How should ChatGPT and other intelligent chatbots be used so that it is ethical, socially responsible and does not break copyright? How should intelligent chatbots that are generative language models be used, so that the texts and other types of works created by tools based on generative artificial intelligence are created fairly, in accordance with the ethics of writing articles, certain documents, photos, graphics, videos, etc., and in such a way that, by the way, within the framework of this type of "creation", copyright is not violated, so that all the necessary footnotes to texts, documents, photos, etc. are reliably shown. source, so that a bibliography with all properly shown sources, source materials, references to source documents, so that materials, articles, books, documents and other source studies are properly and reliably cited?
As chatbots equipped with generative artificial intelligence technology are finding more and more applications within the framework of supporting human creative work, so the level of relevance of discussions concerning the ethical aspects of the use of such tools in the creative production of certain works is also increasing. Since the release of ChatGPT in open access on the Internet, it is a rapidly growing application of this tool in the increasingly automated creation of various types of texts, which until now were written by humans and now for humans can be done by artificial intelligence technology, an intelligent chatbot based on a generative language model. Advanced generative language models are taught to produce various types of texts based on artificial neural network technology, which are taught specific "skills" through a process of deep learning on the basis of data and information from many online databases, online libraries, indexing databases of scientific papers, information portals containing millions of source texts, and are refined through ongoing discussions with millions of users on the Internet. At present, such intelligent chatbots based on advanced generative language models are already being made available on the Internet by almost all leading Internet technology companies, or are currently working on developing and improving such tools and will soon make them available in open access to Internet users. Such increasingly "intelligent" tools that develop various kinds of documents, texts, studies in an increasingly sophisticated way and carry out the "creative" process in an increasingly perfect way are finding a rapidly growing scale of new applications and are being used more and more widely by Internet users. However, on the other hand, in a situation where Internet users use such tools not only for casual discussions, for fun, for entertainment, and commission intelligent chatbots to develop an article, formalized document, photo, graphic, etc. intended for publication, for use in a thesis, in an analytical report on the analysis and evaluation of the functioning of certain real-world economic entities and institutions, etc., then certain problems of an ethical nature arise. then certain ethical problems arise in connection with the use by the said intelligent chatbots from texts, documents, photos, articles and scientific and other books available on the Internet, etc., without first asking the authors of these studies, works, etc. whether they allow the use of their works, works, studies that have been published on the Internet in advance. In addition to this, ethical problems are also related to the fact that the said intelligent chatbots, in the course of automated development of works, often still do not fully show footnotes to sources, on show a full bibliography in the specified standards for the development of bibliographic descriptions of texts and source materials. Besides, also during the discussions conducted by intelligent chatbots with Internet users, it is not obligatory for the company providing the chatbot to obtain consent from the Internet user for the use of his knowledge, his documents and studies, his works, which he will enter into the database system of the intelligent chatbot, which are then used to improve the discussions conducted on the part of the chatbot, and are used to provide answers, to perform commissioned works for subsequent other Internet users. Besides, what is particularly important, in a situation when an intelligent chatbot on the order of an Internet user develops a certain work, and if it even shows sources for data, shows materials, publications, articles, books, photos, other source materials in the footnotes, in the bibliography, then at the same time a request is not sent to the authors of the source works for the possibility of their use by the chatbot in the development of a certain commissioned work by another Internet user, and no consent is taken from the authors of the original sources of data, information, results of previously conducted research, analysis, etc. Besides, in connection with the fact that many of the above-mentioned issues are not regulated by law, so there is still no mandatory requirement for authors of studies created with the involvement of tools based on a certain generative artificial intelligence technology to demonstrate that the work or a part of it, a certain fragment was created with the use of a certain mentioned tool. Accordingly, studies, texts, photos created with the use of such intelligent tools may contain information that is inconsistent with the facts and can be and are used to generate disinformation on the Internet, mainly on social media websites. Therefore, there are various dangers, risks, serious dangers associated with the unauthorized, incompatible with ethical principles, without respect for copyright, creation of certain works through the use of generative artificial intelligence. Thus, it is necessary to properly regulate all the above-mentioned issues concerning the creation of various types of works using generative artificial intelligence. In addition to this, it is necessary to legally sanction the creation of a requirement to automatically mark the works created in this way that a particular study, text, article, document, photo, film, etc. was created using a particular intelligent tool. It is also necessary to systematically organize the collection of consent from the authors of various types of source works, previously written texts, articles, books, made studies, photos, films, whose authors are human creators for the use of their works in the automated creation of further studies and works but already realized by tools based on generative artificial intelligence.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
How should ChatGPT and other intelligent chatbots be used so that it is ethical, socially responsible and does not violate copyrights? How should intelligent chatbots that are generative language models be used, so that the texts and other types of works created by tools based on generative artificial intelligence are created fairly, in accordance with the ethics of writing articles, certain documents, photos, graphics, videos, etc., and in such a way that, by the way, within the framework of this type of "creation", copyrights are not violated, so that all necessary footnotes to texts, documents, photos, etc., are reliably demonstrated. source, so that a bibliography with all properly shown sources, source materials, references to source documents is developed to the full extent, so that materials, articles, books, documents and other source studies are cited correctly and reliably?
How should ChatGPT be used so that it is ethical, socially responsible and does not violate copyrights?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research. In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear technical support,
I uploaded a conference paper, and the current title of this publication is "TN SD 353 1817 41486 Silva eet al 2020". I would like to correct the title´s to "Avaliação da técnica de blockchain na rastreabilidade na agroindústria a sucroenergética". How can I proceed with this correction?
Thank you
*Why journals do not pay the reviewers and editors?
*What suggestion do you have regarding the value of payment incentives to these core stakeholders in timely managing and enhancing the accountability and the quality of published works?
For several years now, the procedure of granting a vote of confidence to the municipal executive by the legislative has been in force in Poland. It takes place annually and is not related to the budget implementation report but to the general state of the municipality. Are you aware of similar solutions in local governments of other countries?
Probably no one will award me a PhD by publication, HOWEVER, my work on ResearchGate is SO original that someone, to END SCIENTIFIC STAGNATION, should. The fact so many of my works BEGIN with metaphysics DEMONSTRATES ORIGINALITY. I am widening the otherwise narrow field of scientific research. References:
Code Popper-Freud Theorem
All about article retraction in academic publishing
Retraction is removing an article from the scientific record at any point after its publication. Retraction is distinct from withdrawal, which occurs prior to publication. Also, in contrast to withdrawal, retractions are visible to the scientific community, as the original papers are typically preserved as part of the publication record.
I am a PhD scholar looking for a Q1,Q2 Scopus indexed journal related to the domain of adolescent mental health and stigma, preferably with a good acceptance rate and quicker publication process. I have been in the process of searching for relevant journals for my topic, any suggestions would be of great help.
I am new in your system, kindly help to upload my publication into your system
Hello, I am Simone from MU, Ethiopia. My question is concerned to publication, shall I publish full of paper and acceptable in all competition?
My first publication is listed in Research Gate as 1975 - this is incorrect. How do I search for this paper so I can edit/delete it?
- How many journals can I submit my research to for publication?
- Can you recommend some high-quality, free journals in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT)?
Dear Authors,
We are currently in the process of editing a forthcoming book entitled Developing Effective and High-Performing Teams in Higher Education, to be published by IGI Global, an international publisher of progressive academic research. We would like to take this opportunity to cordially invite you to submit your work for consideration in this publication.
In addition to your contribution as an author, if you like to serve as a reviewer, please let us know.
All submitted chapters will be reviewed on a double-blind review basis, and there are no submission or acceptance fees for manuscripts submitted to this book publication.
Please visit https://www.igi-global.com/publish/call-for-papers/call-details/7177 for more details regarding this publication and to submit your work. You can also find detailed manuscript formatting and submission guidelines at http://www.igi-global.com/publish/contributor-resources/before-you-write/. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Thank you very much for your consideration of this invitation, and we hope to hear from you soon!
Important Dates
March 3, 2024: Proposal Submission Deadline
March 17, 2024: Notification of Acceptance
May 26, 2024: Full Chapter Submission
July 7, 2024: Review Results Returned
August 4, 2024: Final Acceptance Notification
August 11, 2024: Final Chapter Submission
Best wishes,
Tashieka Burris-Melville
Shalieka Burris
I completed the experiment for one of our colaborators (I measured inhibition of an enzyme by 3 compounds). Unfortunatelly compounds were not active in the range of dilutions that I had used (up to 10 micromol). Higher concentrations caused the paradoxically high signal due to (probably) interactions with the detection reagent. Therefore concentrations higher than 10 micromol were excluded and, in the end, I could not observe the full dose-dependent curves (and did not calculate IC50). If it was my publication I would left the results like this with the explanation why higher concentrations were not included. But the colaborator asked If I could "complete the curve" on the graph for one of the compounds. I would rather not do that but I consulted one of my supervisors and added dotted line in place where could be the curve (the highest concentration of compound reached ~ 50% of the maximal inhibition, rest of the curve was predicted by the program). I though, that the request was made just to make graph more pleasant to the eye. But later the same collaborator made another request - to calculate IC50 from that curve (where half was from the experiment and half was "predicted" by the program with the assumption that the compound will reach 100% of inhibition - which is not certain). The collaborator also asked to "complete" another curve (where experimental data reached only 25% of the maximal inhibition).
If it was my publication I would never do that. I do not want to suggest that I tested concentrations that I did not test and I do not want to suggest that the compounds were able to fully inhibit enzyme (which I did not prove). Also I do not want to create "artificial IC50" which could be used to compare the compound with different compounds creating false conclusions. But maybe I am wrong? Therefeore I want to ask:
Is it correct practice to "complete the curve" (to elongate the curve to reach 100% of expected effect) even if you did not test higher concentrations (because higher concentrations were to high for the assay). Is it correct to calculate IC50 from that kind of curve?
I want my research to be reviewed Ang published thru print and online
