Science topic

RNA - Science topic

A polynucleotide consisting essentially of chains with a repeating backbone of phosphate and ribose units to which nitrogenous bases are attached. RNA is unique among biological macromolecules in that it can encode genetic information, serve as an abundant structural component of cells, and also possesses catalytic activity. (Rieger et al., Glossary of Genetics: Classical and Molecular, 5th ed)
Questions related to RNA
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
I have been trying to isolate RNA from magur fish testis, at the end of RNA isolation, RNA pellets becoming gel when DEPC water is added, what could be the possible reason for that? What is the solution?
Relevant answer
Answer
It is most likely the result of impurities like salts, proteins, or other organic components co-precipitating with the RNA during the isolation process that causes RNA pellets from testis samples to become gel-like during the isolation process. These impurities may prevent the RNA pellet from dissolving in water or RNA resuspension buffer, resulting in the production of a gel-like material rather than a transparent RNA solution.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
I am using Purelink RNA mini kit (Fischer Scientific) to extract total RNA from bacteria. i need to get better RNA integrity number like more than 7, but for only one sample I got 7.4, for other samples it is less than 7. Can anyone please suggest anything what and how can I get better result? Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
I don't see any connection to your post related to my post here.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Does anyone have any advice regarding 16s metagenomics and an appropriate sequencing depth and paired end reads. Expecting around 10-15 organisms within the samples.
Thank you :)
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for your reply :) I'm looking to find the low abundance organisms!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
For researchers who have conducted transcriptomics using the adult rat prefrontal cortex, is it necessary to optimize the RNA extraction method? Additionally, what is the average weight of the rat prefrontal cortex, and how much RNA can typically be extracted from it?
Relevant answer
Answer
The average brain weight of a rat is 1.5-2 g, depending on the body weight and the age.
TRIZOL is a good option for RNA isolation; typical yields from brain tissue (mg RNA/mg tissue) are 1‑1.5 mg.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
6 answers
Who (first) proposed/used/coined the term ‘translation’ in biology/genetics? What is the history behind the use of the word? Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
The oldest relevant reference in the OED is to a paper by Gamow and Yčas from 1955, namely Statistical Correlation of Protein and Ribonucleic Acid Composition.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
8 answers
The amount of total RNA used by each group was different during reverse transcription. Can it be compensated by adjusting the same CT value during PCR?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, it's generally okay to start with different amounts of RNA in reverse transcription (RT). However, the amount of RNA you start with can influence the efficiency and accuracy of the RT reaction.
Starting with more RNA can sometimes lead to better detection of low-abundance transcripts while starting with less RNA might be necessary if you're working with limited sample material or if you're trying to avoid bias in your downstream analysis.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Unfortunately, there is a delay of about an hour between the the tumor extraction by the surgeon and sample freezing. How can I protect the RNA in the tumor from degradation at this time?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yasaman Naeimzadeh I think RNAlater (https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/brands/product-brand/rnalater.html) will help you. It can keep the samples at 25°C for one week.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
Hi,
I recently made a mutant cell line by excising an exon from the gene, DNMT1, using CRISPR-CAS9. I isolated a single cell population that has this mutation and confirmed the mutation using PCR and Sanger sequencing. My PI also wants to use RT-qPCR to show that the sequence is missing in the mRNA. I made 3 sets of primers targetting the exon, so I would only expect amplification in the negative control cell line and not in the mutant line. However, when I ran the qPCR, I got normal amplification of this DNMT1 exon in both the negative control and the mutant line (~ct values around 23 for both).
I've extracted RNA three separate times to make sure I didnt have RNA contamination the times prior, but I still get the same result.
If anyone has experience with this or may have solutions, any help is appreciated!
Relevant answer
Answer
Using RT-qPCR to validate CRISPR-based knockout (KO) experiments can be highly effective but may also encounter several challenges that need careful consideration and troubleshooting. Here’s a structured approach to effectively use RT-qPCR for confirming gene knockouts and addressing potential issues:
1. Design of RT-qPCR Assays
  • Primer Design: Ensure that the primers for RT-qPCR are designed to specifically amplify the target region affected by the CRISPR KO. Primers should flank the CRISPR target site or span exon junctions to avoid amplification of potential non-targeted isoforms or residual non-edited transcripts.
  • Control Genes: Select appropriate housekeeping genes as controls for normalization. These should be genes known to have stable expression across your experimental conditions.
2. RNA Extraction and Quality Control
  • RNA Quality: Extract high-quality RNA using a reliable method. The integrity of RNA can be assessed using gel electrophoresis or a bioanalyzer. Degraded RNA can lead to unreliable RT-qPCR results.
  • Contamination Check: Ensure that the RNA is free from genomic DNA contamination. Treat the RNA samples with DNase I to remove any potential contaminating DNA that could affect the RT-qPCR results.
3. cDNA Synthesis
  • Reverse Transcription: Use a high-quality reverse transcription kit for cDNA synthesis. The choice between random hexamers and oligo(dT) primers depends on the location of your qPCR primers and the RNA regions you aim to detect.
4. qPCR Reaction Setup
  • Efficiency Validation: Before performing RT-qPCR on your samples, validate the efficiency of your primers. Perform a standard curve analysis using a serial dilution of cDNA to ensure that primer efficiency is between 90% and 110%.
  • Technical Replicates: Include technical replicates for each sample to ensure reproducibility and reliability of the RT-qPCR data.
5. Data Analysis
  • Relative Quantification: Use the ΔΔCt method for relative quantification of gene expression. This method involves comparing the Ct values of the target gene normalized to a reference gene and then comparing the normalized value to a control sample.
  • Statistical Analysis: Perform statistical analysis to compare gene expression levels between CRISPR-edited and control samples. This can help confirm whether the gene knockdown or knockout has been successful.
6. Troubleshooting Common Issues
  • Inconsistent Results: If results are inconsistent, check for primer-dimer formation, non-specific amplification (check melt curves), or issues with RNA quality.
  • Partial Knockdown Observed: Sometimes, CRISPR may not completely knock out a gene but reduce its expression. Consider the possibility of incomplete editing or existence of differentially edited cell populations.
  • No Change in Expression: If no change in expression is detected, verify the CRISPR target site and mutation by sequencing the genomic DNA. It's possible that the CRISPR system did not induce the expected edits, or that compensatory mechanisms in the cell have maintained the expression levels.
Conclusion
Using RT-qPCR to validate CRISPR knockouts involves careful experimental design, precise execution, and thorough data analysis. By addressing each step with meticulous detail—from RNA extraction to data analysis—you can robustly validate the success of CRISPR-mediated gene knockouts and gain insights into the genetic manipulations within your experimental system.
Perhaps this protocol list can give us more information to help solve the problem.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hi all
earlier I have seen in some papers people go for DNA extraction and normal PCR using 16S rRNA primers for the identification of bacteria. However recently I have seen few papers particularly dealing with Uncultured “Candidatus” bacteria, researchers go for RNA extraction, reverse transcription RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR ? Molecular biology experts can you please tell me …..
1. what’s the key advantage between the two ? is there any particular advantage of RT PCR for the identification of Uncultured “Candidatus” bacteria ?
2. Is it because of the possibility of “relative quantification” of the bacterium by real-time RT-PCR by targeting the 16S rRNA gene of the bacterium?
3. Is there any advantage when (RT PCR) used for uncultivable bacteria?
4. what is this Cycle threshold ? what is the significance of this in the above reaction ?
5. Also “The eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha from the host was used as a control of the RNA amount, and a good extraction was expected to give a Ct-value around 15 (the cycle threshold was set to 0.1). ? all results with Ct-values above 45 were considered negative !, what does it all mean?
My aim is just to identify the unculturable bacteria from tissues! Can I go for just normal PCR (16s rDNA) and sequencing the PCR products? Please
thank you
regards,
Relevant answer
Answer
hi Jonathan, thank you for your all response.
i am not referring to the paper exactly you mentioned, But of course I wanted to identify a Candidatus/uncultured bacteria. will go ahead with the 16S PCR and sequence the product....thank you again ...regards
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Hello everyone,
I have performed EMSA experiment with an RNA-binding protein and RNA. For both ssRNA and dsRNA, for higher concentration of protein, I observe a high intensity band at the dye front (lower than the free RNA band). The intensity of this band decreases with decrease in protein concentration. I have performed the experiments in a cold room with 0.5X TAE buffer and 8% gel.
Any idea why this is happening?
Relevant answer
Answer
In an Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA), the mobility of RNA-protein complexes (RNP-RNA) and free RNA is affected by various factors including size, charge, and shape. Here's why RNP-RNA might migrate faster than free RNA at higher protein concentrations . the combination of changes in size, charge, shape, and gel interaction due to the formation of RNP-RNA complexes at higher protein concentrations can lead to faster migration of the complexes compared to free RNA during EMSA.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
I'm teaching a student to do Drosophila embryo whole mount RNA in situs. She's using the same solutions that I use however her embryos turn light tan to medium brown after incubating O/N in prehyb. Does anyone have suggestions for how this is happening?
Relevant answer
Answer
In RNA in situ hybridization experiments, especially with Drosophila embryos, it's not uncommon for embryos to turn brown after the prehybridization step. This can happen due to various factors: Endogenous Enzymatic Activity, Non-specific Binding, Fixation Artifacts,
To address this issue, you can try the following:
Optimize the fixation protocol to minimize artifacts.
Use stringent wash conditions to reduce non-specific binding.
Optimize the prehybridization and hybridization conditions to improve probe specificity.
Reduce the incubation time with detection substrates and monitor the staining process closely to prevent over-development.
Experiment with different detection systems or substrates to minimize background staining.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Prior to the research carried out by the research group who published this journal, they assessed HDV RNA detection's diagnostic efficacy utilizing the HDV RNA detection technique and discovered that it had a good diagnostic yield. However, HDV serology's diagnostic effectiveness hasn't been thoroughly assessed and documented, thus, the need to consider the factors needed in developing a reliable serological test for HDV antibodies.
Relevant answer
Answer
Developing a reliable serological test for HDV antibodies that can effectively account for diverse genotypes requires careful consideration of several factors:
  1. Antigen Selection: Identifying antigens that are conserved across different HDV genotypes is essential to ensure the test's effectiveness across various strains. Antigenic regions that are highly conserved among different genotypes would be preferable for maximizing test sensitivity.
  2. Cross-Reactivity: Assessing potential cross-reactivity with antibodies from other related viruses, such as hepatitis B virus (HBV), is crucial to avoid false-positive results. HDV commonly infects individuals with HBV, so distinguishing between antibodies to HDV and HBV is important for accurate diagnosis.
  3. Genotype-Specific Detection: Developing assays capable of detecting genotype-specific antibodies can provide valuable information about the specific HDV strain present in an individual. This may involve incorporating genotype-specific antigens or optimizing assay conditions to enhance genotype discrimination.
  4. Sensitivity and Specificity Optimization: Ensuring high sensitivity to detect even low levels of antibodies and high specificity to minimize false-positive results is critical for the reliability of the test. This may involve optimizing assay parameters, such as antigen concentration, incubation time, and detection methods.
  5. Validation with Diverse Patient Samples: Testing the serological assay with a diverse range of patient samples, including those infected with different HDV genotypes and individuals with co-infections (e.g., HBV/HDV), is necessary to validate its effectiveness across various populations.
  6. Quality Control Measures: Implementing robust quality control measures throughout the development and manufacturing process is essential to ensure the consistency and reproducibility of the test results.
By carefully considering these factors, researchers can develop a serological test for HDV antibodies that effectively accounts for the diversity of HDV genotypes and provides accurate diagnostic information. This can significantly improve our ability to diagnose and manage HDV infections in clinical settings.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
9 answers
So I'm using TRIzol for RNA extraction, but suddenly I'm getting no pellet during the isopropanol step *even though I added glycogen.*
A few weeks ago I:
1. Took a large quantity of bacteria
2. Resuspended in TRIzol
3. Made a bunch of aliquots
4. Stored them all at -80
And those couple weeks ago, I was getting~50 ug of RNA per aliquot (with good RINs, and they looked great on RNA gels).
Yesterday, I took another aliquot and tried to prep it using the exact same process, and got nothing. No pellet appeared during the isopropanol precipitation step even though I added GlycoBlue.
I continued the purification to see if the pellet was just hard to see: ~0 ng/uL by nanodrop
Did I just make a pipetting error? Was my isopropanol bad? No: I repeated the repeated the process *again* with completely new sample, completely new isopropanol, and still no pellet at all.
I'm confident I'm lysing my samples well. I optimized the lysis a while ago, but even before optimization, my yields were never this bad.
I'm sure I added the GlycoBlue. I watched it diffuse into my sample.
I'm sure I added isopropanol. I watched the alcohol/water mix and used brand new isopropanol.
I'm sure I mixed the isopropanol/aqueous phase. I watched it carefully.
I'm sure I actually spun my samples. I tried it over and over.
Protocol:
1. Take bacteria+TRIzol aliquot from -80 (which used to give ~50 ug)
2. Lyse via bead beating (same beads, same bead beater, same settings, same duration that gave 50 ug in the past)
3. Add 0.2 V chloroform
4. Centrifuge 12k xg for 15 min
5. Take upper, colorless aqueous phase
6. Add 1 V of RT isopropanol
7. Add ~30 ug GlycoBlue
8. Invert a bunch of times to mix well
9. Incubate 10 min RT
10. Centrifuge ~20k xg for 10 min
Nothing. No pellet at all. Even with glycogen.
I tried spinning again: No pellet
How is this possible?
Relevant answer
Answer
I’ve had similar issues recently isolating small quantities of RNA (ribosome protected fragments). I use 300 mM sodium acetate pH 5.2 and 5 mM magnesium chloride followed by ethanol precipitation (2.5 volumes) overnight at -20 C with addition of 1.5 uL GlycoBlue. Spin at 20,000 x g for 1 h at 4 C in Eppendorf low bind tubes. I see good pellets in some samples but not for others. I do invert tubes sufficiently after addition of ethanol. I wonder if vortexing and centrifuging again might help. In some samples in looks like several particles precipitated on the side of the tube and not the bottom. Perhaps such multi-localized pelleting is the issue. Otherwise my best guess is RNase contamination. Although I am very careful with using fresh gloves and RNase Away on pipettes and gloves.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Hi,
I have recently been working on RNA purification from RNA-binding proteins. I used a protein-specific antibody to immunoprecipitate the protein RNA complex and then extracted RNA from the complex. I used Trizol to extract RNA and precipitated the RNA using ethanol. After centrifugation, I got a liquid drop of RNA but not a solid pellet.
Does anybody have any idea about what happened?
Thanks
Baoye
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello
Try using a carrier molecule like glycogen, LPA etc. during precipitation
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
I am about to perform 5'RACE with TAKARA kit on total RNA isolated (trizol method) from neuronal samples differentiated in the same time frame. So I have 3 RNA replicates of one sample, all isolated at the same time. Can I combine the RNA (for example ,1 microgram from each replicate) from replicates of one biological sample and then perform the 5'RACE ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Combining RNA from technical replicates of one biological sample is a common and valid approach for 5' Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE) experiments. This practice can enhance the robustness and reliability of the experiment by minimizing variability introduced during sample preparation and processing. Key considerations include ensuring consistency in RNA preparation methods, normalizing RNA concentrations if needed, verifying RNA quality, designing experiments to account for technical variability, and interpreting results appropriately, considering potential technical artifacts. Overall, combining RNA from technical replicates can improve the reliability of 5' RACE experiments, provided that proper experimental design and data analysis techniques are employed.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
Dear Researchers,
I have a couple of falcons with collected media from cell cultures. I have been storing them for a year in 4*C. They were collected for an experiment that I hadn't had the chance to finish. My question is, can I perform any analysis on them while they were stored in such conditions for this long? Anything with DNA/RNA/proteins? Or everything is degraded by now? I will appreciate every idea.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you have media from old cell cultures, you can consider several options:
  1. Attempt to revive viable cells by subculturing into fresh media.
  2. Use the media for various assays or experiments, such as cell viability assays or biochemical assays.
  3. Use the old media as a control in experiments with newly cultured cells to ensure consistency.
  4. Dispose of the media properly if unsure of its quality or preservation.
  5. Be cautious about potential contamination and perform sterility checks.
  6. Consult with colleagues or experts for guidance on the suitability of the media for your specific needs. The decision depends on factors like cell type, storage conditions, and experimental requirements.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
I wanted to add a methyl group in the adenine N6 position in the RNA for some docking and simulation studies. Is there any protocol or CODE for such editing to CH3 to the existing RNA ?? Is it possible in the discovery studio or modeler??? what is the process??
#INSILICO_BIOLOGY #Computational_Biology #DISCOVERY?_STUDIO
Relevant answer
Answer
Pymol i used but not working great.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Hello All,
Do you have any suggestions to extract RNA from frozen blood samples collected from mice, for miRNA studies? The blood samples were stored in Eppendorf tubes at -80C.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
You will use the blood RNA extraction kit, such as 1154G84 Quick-RNA Whole Blood Kit (50 Preps), however RNA degrades quite quickly even in -80 so if your samples several weeks old it is quite likely that you will extract highly degraded RNA.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
what is an acceptable RIN level for an RNA sequ experiment? G
Relevant answer
Answer
our core suggests a RIN > 7 andt can work with RIN >3 but results might not be as good
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Hi,
I am growing Caco2 cells in 24 Transwell cell inserts. I am planning to induce gut leakage by LPS and want to study gene expressions. My concern is to isolate the RNA from transwell inserts since those are very tiny and hard to use cell scrapper. Any protocol or suggestions would be greatly appreciated
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
I hope the attachment is useful for your reference.
According to the protocol provided in the reference, you can harvest and lysis cells using Buffer RLT directly without any scraping, followed by RNA purification as instructed.
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
I am planning to get some blood from patients to perform RNA seq (circular RNA which requires deep sequencing). I am wondering if anyone can share the protocol with details. I am also wondering about the amount of blood (whole / plasma / serum) to isolate RNA for deep sequencing. Thank you so much for your help!
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use EasyPure® Genomic DNA Kit, 200ul from clotted blood is enough to start your protocol then follow the pamphlet protocol
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
I'm getting very low yields - 1/2ng and unfortunately can only take 20mls from the donors. Any help would be much appreciated!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Arbesu, I am wondering such RNA concentration of 15-20 ng/uL is enough to do cDNA Reverse Transcription? And from your experience, what ratio of A280/260 were you getting from Nanodrop of the platelet RNA sample? I appreciate any replies from you!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hey,
Usually, when I perform total RNA extraction, I directly synthesize cDNA and run qPCR without even analyzing or testing the purity of RNA. I am asked to use 15µl of RNA when synthesizing DNA. However, I am not able to understand the reason that is given to me, because in academia they taught us that RNA has to be tested for purity before proceeding with further experiments. I also don't understand the idea behind just using 15µl exactly to synthesize cDNA instead of calculating the exact amount needed. If there is logic behind that, can someone explain it to me in simple words?
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
If you have a DNAse treatment step during the extraction process, verification of the purity of your RNA might be optional.
However, for best practice, it is always good to run an agarose gel that shows:
-Purity of RNA (no gDNA on the top of the gel)
-Quality of the RNA (2 discrete bands corresponding to rRNA), no smear of degradation.
The latest is especially important ave inconsistent qPCR results with low-quality RNA.
When I run RT-qPCR, I prefer to always use the same quantity (usually 1 ug of total RNA) rather than simply adding equal volumes of random quantities.
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone. I am interested in performing a time-course bulk RNA-seq experiment of FACS sorted cell populations. I will use a live-cell fluorescent for sorting so fixing before sorting is out of the question. I need to sort cells at 0-6h-12h-24h-48h-72h but I want to prepare the RNAs at the same time from each sample. Is it possible to fix the cells after sorting and isolate RNA later? Or is it possible to freeze the cell pellet after sorting and isolate RNA later? Any recommendations by any means (protocol, kits, etc.)?
Relevant answer
Answer
In addition to Tom's response, another option is to preserve the sorted cells in RNALater, then proceed to freeze them and subsequently isolate RNA.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
5 answers
I've been trying to extract RNA from mouse lung tissues (normal and tumour) and slowly improving the yield and purity measured via Nanodrop and Qubit (I'm consistently getting 260/280 ratios of ~2 and 260/230 >2 + yields of 40-100 ng/uL). I'm using the Qiagen Mini kit with DNase I and have been using all the small tweaks I can find from here and papers to optimize my yield. I've also been trying to work with RNaseZap and maintain as clean of an environment as possible.
My trouble currently is with RNA degradation- on the Bioanalyzer my samples have come back with RIN values with a range of 5.4 to 6.9 (attached), which from what I've read is unfortunately too low for RNA-seq. I've been using an OMNI tissue homogenizer for 20 seconds x3, is this possibly leading to shearing of my RNA? Has anyone else used a rotor homogenizer on tissue and had good RIN values? I can't think of what else to optimize and I'm wondering if it's potentially a sample issue (the samples are 2-4 years old stored in the -80), but I want to maximize everything I can before coming to that conclusion.
Would another extraction method potentially lead to less degradation? Would Trizol + then running it through an RNeasy column potentially help with this issue?
Relevant answer
Answer
The reason you re getting less yield with gauge needles might be due to incomplete/partial mechanical breakdown. I see you said that you used 8 (perhaps you meant 18?), perhaps the 8 gauge isn't breaking down enough of the tissue clumps so that the 21 and 25 gauge can finish off at a finer level. I would stress that the first gauge is crucial for the success of the finer needles. 21 and 25 are quiet tough, I know 21 gauge was giving me real difficulty/strain on my fingers.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
5 answers
I want to covert RNA aptamer to DNA aptamer.
I try this process by Discovery studio.
This software includes the "Build and Edit Nucleic Acid tool".
I could modify the sugar easily.
However, I edit the 5H to methyl in U to convert T with manually process. It is very time-consuming.
Do you have a good idea to convert U to T easily?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have done a 6 mins video to answer the question.
Find the solution very easily in the link below:
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
Hello!
I'm extracting RNA from fiddler crab (Leptuca pugilator) larvae and embryos for Tag-Seq. I've extracted using an RNAqueous RNA Extraction Kit and we wanted to determine RNA quality and integrity using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer System.
I'm attaching screen grabs of the gel and peaks produced by the bioanalyzer. I expected to see 28S and 18S bands and peaks. However, I have one larger band on the gel and one large peak that seems to lie between 28S and 18S.
Has anyone seen anything similar using this instrument? Any insight would be highly appreciated. I would love to hear from someone that's worked with a similar species if y'all are out there!
Relevant answer
Answer
Colleen M Ingram We determined that it was not DNA contamination! We found an article on honeybees that saw a similar pattern. We figured out that the heating step of my RNA extraction kit was the problem, which looks like what is discussed in this publication! Thank you so much for sharing, I will definitely give this a read -- wish I could send it back in time to me a few years ago, haha. :')
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hi All,
I would like to seek for your expert input for below queries on RNA QC for RNASeq:
Can we proceed for RNASeq run on RNA less than 10ng, with DV200 in between 68 - 80%?Details as below:
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6
ng/uL 4.36 5.36 4.14 4.69 2.85 14.7
A260/280 2.472 2.061 1.636 2.057 1.968 1.968
A260/230 2.044 1.511 0.857 0.837 0.610 2.011
RQS NA NA NA NA NA 2.6
DV200 68.9 80.3 75.5 72.2 80.5 71.8
FYI, the RNA samples were extracted from the laser capture microdissected tissues.
Many thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
John Hardy Lockhart Thank you very much for sharing your perspective and advice. This input will guide our decision-making process moving forward. Indeed, we utilize the Qubit Fluorometer 4.0 for RNA quantification purposes.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
For DNA islolation
Relevant answer
Answer
Mostly monocytes, lymphocytes and neutrophils are the most cells contributed to the blood clot, so I think it is hard to study all these cells together under one project.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
My student optimizes the RNA dot-blot method using a biotinylated cDNA probe. The aim is to detect a positive hybridization signal of a probe complementary to transcripts of a housekeeping gene for Human actin beta in the human RNA samples. So far, we have not been able to detect consistent hybridization signals. Either there were non-specific, very weak or no hybridization signals at all. Above it, we have recently observed a reverse white signal in dot-blot spots with our human RNA after colourimetric detection. The only such phenomenon I found when googling for the solution appears after chemiluminescent signal detection. The alleged ghost bands or spots appear when a sample or antibody excess consumes chemiluminescent substrates too quickly. However, in the case of colourimetric detection, the chromogenic substrate accumulates instead of being consumed, even in the excess of both sample and antibody. In search of a solution, we performed a dot-blot with a matrix of sample and antibody amount combinations, which resulted in either reverse or no signal et all. Does anybody have any idea where the problem could be?
Please, see the attached photo of the dot-blot results. There are 3 membrane strips, the numbers 1, 3, and 5 at each strip indicate the antibody dilution 1:1000, 1:3000, and 1:5000 respectively. The pink strip on the top of the photo shows the identity (and in the case of RNA samples also the total amount) of loaded samples in the indicated order. There are total RNA samples at the concentrations 5 ug, 500 ng, and 50 ng, followed by positive control spots of biotinylated lectin (positive control of colourimetric development of a signal produced by reporter molecule HRP in conjugate with streptavidin) and the rightmost spot is the labelled probe.
I will be very grateful for any suggestions!
Relevant answer
Answer
White residue does usually mean too much signal and the chromophore has been used up but I wonder in your case if the saple has not bound to the membrane but has affected the loading spot so that it is blocked more than the rest of the filter producing no signal.
Samples are usually bound to the membrane in high salt so that everything binds and then the filter is washed at lower salt to get a strong bound signal but also a low background. I would check the type of membrane to ensure good sample binding ( heating the membrane or incubating in NaOH for some nylon membranes) Possibly use a higher salt wash to ensure getting a strong signal but possibly with high backround and if that works then try more stringent washes but getting a positive signal will make troubleshooting easier because negative results can come from many sources...wash temperature.wash or binding salt concentrations or faulty reagents
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
I am working on a variety of DNA and RNA structures (generally quite short 20-40bp) and I have seen some worrying results around stability. I understand the nature of the solution will affect the structures ie ice crystallization, pH etc but I was just wondering what others have used and why? Obviously there's Glycerol, trehalose etc any off the shelf solutions others can recommend before I spend the money?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
RNA can be subject to self hydrolysis by its reactive 2'-OH group on its ribose sugar moiety at basic pH > 7. The hydrolysis seems to be magnesium enhanced so inclusion of EDTA to 1 mM in 10 - 20 mM Tris buffer chelates away the magnesium. Some people recommend acidic buffers. I have never actually worked with RNA directly. You also have to watch out for RNAse which is a nasty contaminant enzyme that enzyme that can survive an autoclave.
DNA is pretty difficult to destroy. It can be destroyed by DNAse but fortunately DNase doesn't survive an autoclave. Scientists have extracted DNA from thousand year old mummies so DNA is quite stable under extreme conditions.
DNA can be stored at -20C and RNA probably should be stored at -80C. I don't think ice crystal formation is even an concern for RNA and DNA. The concern is enzymatic or pH or metal driven hydrolysis.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
6 answers
I would like help reading the quality and integrity of my RNA. This picture makes me think all my RNA seems degraded?
I have been trying to extract RNA from mouse lung tumor and normal tissue for the past month with varied success in terms of concentrations and purity from Nanodrop and Qubit (concentrations too low to measure to 80 ng/uL). My tissue sizes are very small (about 7 to 20mm3), so I've been trying to do all I can to maximize my yield like using RNALater-ICE and using RNAse Zap on my equipment. I currently use an Omni tissue homogenizer for 40s on my tissue in RLT buffer plus beta-mercaptoethanol. My extractions have been done with the Qiagen Mini kit and I've read all the posts I can find on here and several papers about how to optimize RNA yield with this kit; yet my yields are just averaging about 40 ng/uL of RNA.
I've decided to add the optional DNAse digestion step to my extractions and I wanted to check for gDNA contamination and assess the RNA quality of my extractions by gel electrophoresis since we do not have access to a Bioanalyzer. I've seen that RNA can be run on native gels, so these pictures are of a 1% agarose gel with 1X TBE and 60V at 60 minutes with a DNA ladder to check running of the gel and my RNA samples +/- DNase, samples were mixed with 6x loading dye. Are these images indicative of RNA degradation or do I need to run a non-denaturing gel (if so, how do I do that)? There's a dark pinkish band on the bottom half of the gel that's hard to see in the picture very clear in normal lighting and I'm not sure what that represents? I definitely don't see bands for 28S and 16S so I'm feeling kind of hopeless that all my RNA quantities measured by Qubit represent poor quality RNA. I would like to send my RNA for RNA sequencing eventually (not specifically from these samples, which are more for practice).
Thanks so much in advance for reading through and offering any guidance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes you could combine the RNA from different columns together.
The Qiagen kit also says you should get 10-20ug of RNA from lungs, assuming 30mg. However, the binding capacity for the column is 100ug. So in theory, you could use 150-300mg tissue and still be under the max binding capacity.
Depending on how the samples were frozen years ago, flash freeze in liquid nitrogen then store at -80 vs just putting them in the -80 to freeze, could definitely contribute to degradation.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
6 answers
I'm using TRIzol+bead beating to extract RNA from a gram positive bacteria, but I'm getting very low yields (<1 ug total). Years ago, people in my lab got more like 50 ug RNA from this same quantity of bacteria, and I calculated a theoretical max yield of ~200 ug.
I take 2-6*10^9 cfu
Wash once in PBS
Resuspend in 1 mL TRIzol
Bead beat
Then I follow the exact protocol described in the TRIzol documentation:
Starting with step 2 for "Lyse samples and separate phases"
Which is just a generic alcohol precipitation.
The protocol is basically shown here:
I'm not losing the pellet as I have GlycoBlue and I can see a tiny, tiny, tiny blue pellet that I can resuspend.
As far as I understand, this can't be degradation as degraded RNA will still pellet. Is that correct?
Therefore, it must be incomplete lysis. Is that correct?
But I've checked the literature and found papers using the exact same bead beater I use. They all use the same or shorter bead beating times.
This protocol uses the exact same bead beater and lysis steps: 3 min total with a mini-beadbeater-8
Am I correct that degraded RNA will still precipitate? How could my lysis be incomplete if it works for everyone else?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello...!
I would like to know if vortex agitation in excess of time and speed can affect the quality of DNA extraction directly from buffalo feces? I am using Power fecal pro kit but I am not getting good results in terms of DNA quality and I have a suspicion that it could be the excessive vortexing? Does anyone have experience with this?
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
I am doing western blots with an RNA binding protein and believe due to the vertical streaks, that I have RNA contamination. I have tried boiling the samples for longer as well. Another protein I have probed for does not have the vertical streaks and is not an RNA binding protein. Could someone recommend a protocol they have used or know of to get rid of RNA contamination in protein preps for western blots?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Anna Schorr , if your protein is prepared by Trizol there should be little-to-no RNA contamination. Have you actually confirmed there is RNA in the sample, or could the streaks just be electrophoretic artifact?
Very simply you could just treat the samples with RNAse A.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
11 answers
Various pandemic diseases have taught us various lessons from time to time, lastly, the spread of corona virus spread has shown how fickle human condition or survival is in face of sudden outbreak of dangerous diseases!
What are the human security implications of 'corona virus spread' around the world?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Esteemed Reader,
The spread of the coronavirus, specifically referring to the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has posed unprecedented challenges to human security around the globe. The impacts of this pandemic extend far beyond the immediate health crisis, affecting various dimensions of human security, including economic stability, access to essential services, social cohesion, and the functioning of governance systems. Below, we delve into the multifaceted ways in which the spread of the coronavirus threatens human security worldwide.
1. Health Security:The most direct impact of the coronavirus is on health security. The rapid spread of the virus has overwhelmed healthcare systems in many countries, leading to a shortage of medical supplies, hospital beds, and healthcare personnel. This situation has not only jeopardized the care for COVID-19 patients but also disrupted routine healthcare services, affecting the management of other diseases and health conditions.
2. Economic and Livelihood Security:The pandemic has triggered a global economic downturn, affecting livelihoods, increasing unemployment rates, and exacerbating poverty. Lockdown measures, while necessary to contain the virus's spread, have led to the closure of businesses, disruptions in global supply chains, and significant losses in income for workers and families. The economic impact is particularly severe for vulnerable populations and those working in informal sectors.
3. Food Security:Disruptions in agricultural production and supply chains have raised concerns over food security. In some regions, the pandemic has affected food availability and accessibility, increasing the risk of hunger and malnutrition. The economic fallout from the pandemic further compounds food insecurity, as more individuals and families struggle to afford basic necessities.
4. Social Security:The pandemic has strained social fabrics, leading to increased isolation, mental health issues, and domestic violence. Social distancing measures, while crucial for public health, have disrupted traditional support systems and community networks. The situation is exacerbated by the stigma and discrimination associated with COVID-19, affecting certain groups more profoundly.
5. Political and Community Security:The coronavirus has tested the resilience of governance and political systems. In some cases, it has led to the postponement of elections, restricted civic freedoms, and heightened tensions among communities. The effectiveness of governmental responses to the pandemic has also become a source of public scrutiny, influencing trust in public institutions.
6. International Security:On a global scale, the pandemic has impacted international relations and cooperation. Issues such as vaccine nationalism, restrictions on travel, and competition for medical resources have highlighted the challenges of managing a global health crisis in a politically fragmented world. The pandemic underscores the need for strengthened international cooperation and solidarity to address shared threats.
In conclusion, the spread of the coronavirus represents a profound threat to human security, touching upon all aspects of life. Addressing these challenges requires a holistic and coordinated approach that goes beyond immediate health responses, encompassing economic support, social protection, and international collaboration. As we navigate through and beyond this pandemic, the lessons learned will be crucial for building more resilient societies capable of withstanding future crises.
Should you require further insights or wish to discuss specific aspects in more detail, please do not hesitate to reach out.
Best regards,
With this protocol list, we might find more ways to solve this problem.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
I wanted to confirm the binding of a lncRNA to a known protein. The protein is mostly disordered except for the part that may be involved in the binding (a coiled-coil region at the end). I was thinking of performing an EMSA to confirm the binding. And then maybe I was thinking of doing a CLIP-seq to delve deep into the binding motifs and sites to see if the RNA binds to the binding domain or some other site of the protein.
My question is - is CLIP-seq something that one can perform after establishing a binding between two components? As far as I know, CLIP-seq can give more detailed and confirmed binding data concerning motif and site-based proof of the RNA binding to the protein. If not, what can be some other in-vivo experiment that can be done to check the nucleotide-level binding of the RNA-protein?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Haimantika.
EMSA is being used to detect protein-nucleic acid complexes. However, with your protein being disordered, it may not migrate as a single band, and also your lncRNA may be too long for this type of analysis, complicating interpretation of the results.
If you want a relatively quick experiment, you my use your protein of interest as a bait (e. g. FLAG/His-tagged, bound to beads) and test whether your lncRNA binds to it (include also a different RNA as a negative control). You can then detect/quantitate your lncRNA by various approaches (e. g. RT-qPCR).
Best,
Libor
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Greetings!
I started my thesis and I need to research on the methods to extract RNA from vine leaves.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hari Shankar Gadri I will investigate that method. Thank you!
Aissa Saidi Thank you so much for the links!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
I am facing an issue regarding the concentration and purity of RNA, the 260/280 ratio shows contamination.
1. Aspirate media from plated cells.
2. Rinse cell monolayer with room temp PBS only once.
3. Scrape the cell monolayer with cell scraper.
4. Transfer cell to 1.5 ml microfuge tube. Centrifuge at 5000 rpm for 5 min.
5. Remove the supernatant and added 400µl TRIzol. Mix till the pellet dissolve by pipetting thoroughly.
The volume of TRIzol added should be as follows:
For 1 well of a 6 well plate or a 35 mm plate use 400 µl TRIzol.
(After this The lysate is stored at -80 degrees C).
6. Before the phase separation the lysates are thawed on ice.
7. Incubate the lysate for 5 minutes at room temperature.
8. Phase separation: Add 0.2 ml of chloroform to the supernatant (per 1 ml of TRIzol reagent).
9. Shake vigorously for 15 seconds and incubate at room temp for 2-3 min.
10. Centrifuge for 15 min at 12,000 x g at 4ºC.
11. Following centrifugation, the mixture separates into lower red, phenol chloroform phase, an interphase, and a colorless upper aqueous phase. RNA remains exclusively in the aqueous phase. Transfer upper aqueous phase carefully without disturbing the interphase into fresh tube.
12. RNA precipitation: Precipitate the RNA from the aqueous phase by mixing with ice cold isopropyl alcohol. Use 0.5 ml of ice cold isopropyl alcohol (per 1 ml of TRIzol reagent used). Incubate for 10 min on ice (if cloudy, precipitate for an additional 10–15 min).
13. Centrifuge at no more than 12,000 x g for 15 minutes at 4 degree C.
14. After centrifugation, a small white RNA precipitate should be visible on side of the tube at this point.
15. RNA wash: Remove the supernatant completely. Wash the RNA pellet once with 75% ethanol, adding at least 1 ml of 75% ethanol (per 1 ml of TRIzol reagent used). Mix by flicking and inverting tube.
16. Centrifuge at no more than 7,500 x g for 5 minutes at 4 degree C.
17. Repeat the above washing procedure once. Remove all leftover ethanol.
18. Air-dry RNA pellet for 5-10 minutes.
19. Resuspend the pellet in 20ul RNase free water.
20. incubate at 55ºC for 3 min.
21. stored at -20 degree C.
The nanodrop reading is very low (in tens and hundreds) and the 260/280 ratio is coming in 1.8-1.9 range. What is the issue I am not able to understand. Is it due to a handling error or do I need to change in protocol something?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Kishan,
I think you may be losing cells by collecting them and then spinning them down. I first rinse with PBS one time, then I collect the cells by directly adding Trizol (500ul for a 6cm dish or 6 well plate) to the plate. I do not scrape my cells and I just pipette the solution up and down about 5-10 times to help the extraction. With this method I am able to extract RNA from very few human macrophages. I also do use 1ul of glycogen to help pellet my RNA before precipitation, it also prevents me from accidentally disrupting my RNA if I have a visible pellet (alot of times the pellet is too small to see). I am including a reference for the protocol that I use that was published by former colleagues of mine. Please let me know if you have more questions. Hope this helps.
Skylar
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
9 answers
Is there any reason for i failed getting any bands on electrophoresis after i did plasmid isolation from E. coli DH5a? My plasmid is ~17 kb in size and i already checked the transformant with colony PCR but strangely i did not get any plasmid band after i isolated them using alkali lysis method even i have confirmed the pellet presence.
I already include RNase A in my isolation protocol so i am quite sure that the pellet was not from RNA. I also have tried to upscale the culture volume to 50 ml and did the midiprep version of alkali lysis. I already reduced the elution volume to 30 ul. I even tried to use Presto Mini Plasmid Kit from Geneaid but i got no result. This is the first time i encounter such problem. If anyone could give me some suggestions i will be very glad.
p.s. currently i don't have access to nanodrop because the facility that has it currently on lockdown
Relevant answer
Answer
Bruno Ricardo Villanueva Orozco Back then we asked our neighboring lab for a new batch of competent cells as a last attempt (they're on a different building). I don't quite remember but i suppose it was caused by blackouts resulting in a mess of our original stock of competent cells.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Hi guys, I am currently working on qRT-PCR. However, the amount cDNA I got from RT reaction is too little to assess all the targets.
I saw some papers and websites mentioning amplifying cDNA with PCR, I wonder if it is a good thing to do, or if it is better to redo all from the very beginning (extract RNA from tissue).
Many Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
If you don't have enough cDNA, then you have to start with more RNA. There is no way to ensure that you can increase all of the cDNA molecule types and keep the proportions the same.
Typically, unless your target genes are all really low copy number, you can dilute out your cDNA before using it for qPCR.
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Hi! I am trying to do RNA extraction from p7 mice's somatosensory cortex and hippocampus. But I am not sure if the RNA was extracted from the correct brain region. I was wondering if there are any standard ways to test it. Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hippocampus is relatively easy to isolate from the brain but somatosensory cortex isolation needs some practice and needs to be performed under a surgical microscope.
  • Quantitative PCR (qPCR) with region-specific primers: This technique allows amplification and quantification of specific mRNA transcripts unique to the desired brain region. If the primers amplify the expected regions, it can indicate successful RNA extraction from that area. However, negative results might not always definitively rule out the presence of RNA from the target area.
  • Drop-seq or single-cell RNA sequencing: These advanced techniques analyze RNA from individual cells, enabling researchers to directly assess the cell types and their spatial distribution within the extracted RNA sample. This provides confirmation not only of RNA origin but also information on cellular composition.
  • Immunofluorescence with specific markers.
Thanks,
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Hello, I am using the conrad chromatin-associated RNA extraction protocol.
Everything was fine, until it was time to resuspend the pellet corresponding to the chromatin fraction, since a kind of jelly was formed, which absorbed the water.
I need to know how to solve that and if it is normal.
How can I solubilize the pellet?
Relevant answer
Answer
In my experience, "Jelly" is almost aways caused by long, genomic DNA, with the warning that I have not worked with chromatic-associated RNA myself yet, I could imagine you could solve your problem by adding RNAse-free DNAse, there are commercial RNASe-free DNAse preparations available. I know it feels a bit scary to digest (fairly stable) DNA to isolate (fairly unstable)RNA. But the HBV group in my thesis lab did this routinely to get rid of plasmid DNA from transfection of HBV genomes. Worked for them to do HBV northern blots. To avoid the jelly, harsher pipetting (Yellow tips) might help too as it shears long DNA. but as a "clean" solution, the DNAse is probably better.
Good luck and let me know how that turns out as down the line I may have similar problems..
Best, Thomas :-)
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
What is the most effective kit or method for extracting RNA from a very small number of cells?
Relevant answer
Answer
miRNeasy Tissue/Cells Advanced Kits
For phenol-free purification of micro RNA and total RNA from tissues and cells, including small samples.
RNeasy Plus Mini Kit
RNeasy Plus Kits are next-generation QIAGEN RNA extraction kits, that combine high-quality RNA purification with effective gDNA removal with unique gDNA Eliminator columns or plates. Total RNA of high purity and yield is obtained from a wide range of cultured cells and easy-to-lyse tissues. The RNeasy Plus Micro Kit is specially designed for limited amounts of samples and isolates up to 45 µg pure total RNA The RNeasy Plus Mini Kit purifies up to 100 µg total RNA (>200 nt) from a single extraction with efficient gDNA removal. Both kits can be automated on the QIAcube Connect and samples can be conveniently stabilized using RNAprotect Tissue Reagent or Allprotect Tissue Reagent and efficiently disrupted using a TissueRuptor II or TissueLyser II or LT system (available separately). The RNeasy Plus 96 Kit is for high-throughput purification of total RNA from cultured cells grown in 96-well plates.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
I've been conducting RNA extraction from 200 microliters of whole blood using the Purelink RNA Minikit according to the provided instructions. Despite several attempts, I'm consistently obtaining low yields (less than 20ng) with poor quality, indicated by a 260/280 ratio of 3+ and low 260/230 ratios. Unfortunately, I'm unable to switch to a different kit at the moment. Could someone please give me some advice on how to improve both the yield and quality of my RNA extraction?
Relevant answer
Answer
Can Kiessling yeah, I am making a fresh Beta-mercaptoethanol.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hi,
I want to study RNA interacting with my test compound
I am planning to do a RNA- pulldown experiment using streptavidin magnetic beads and biotin conjugated compound. I will detect interacting RNA by PCR.
I am wondering how to elute the RNAs from beads, heating may degrade the RNAs.
Any suggestions appreciated.
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Follow the protocol provided by the manufacturer and use an elution buffer: see e.g. https://www.neb.com/en/protocols/0001/01/01/protocol-for-streptavidin-magnetic-beads
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
ratio is around 1.4-1.8
Relevant answer
Answer
To check the integrity of RNA, you should run RNA sample on denaturing agarose gel. Have you used denaturing agarose gel?
If you have used non-denaturing gel, then the results will be difficult to interpret because the secondary structure of RNA alters its migration pattern in non-denaturing gel so that it will not migrate according to its true size. Moreover, you will also observe multiple bands representing different structures of a single RNA species.
Please note that non-denaturing gel will not give you sharp bands as they would be seen in denaturing gel, a clear 28S and 18S rRNA bands seen for eukaryotic sample.
Please find attached below the protocol for preparing denaturing agarose gel for RNA samples, if you need one.
Best.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
Hi fellows, I've started a project in a new lab where I have to extract RNA from mice liver, brain, and muscles. Upon dissection I immediately snap-freeze the tissue in liquid nitrogen and store it for later isolation. When I had to isolate, I separated a piece of the tissue frozen in the tube with small tweezers, put it in trizol, and returned the tube to -80C.
I've been reading some places and it occured to me that the tissue must be ground to powder while it's frozen before it's used for RNA isolation in trizol. Can anyone please clarify this procedure (everything you do with the dissected tissue up until you put your sample in trizol and homogenize it)? Why is the tissue ground to powder? How long do you wait after snap freezing your tissue to grind it? What tools do you use? What do you do to make sure you preserve the RNA in your sample? How do you measure 50-100mg of tissue (Trizol protocol says thats the range u should use in 1mL) while avoiding the thawing of the tissue and activation of endogenous RNAses?
Any insight will be appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello, You don't necessarily need to pulverize your samples before extraction with Trizol; I have seen this procedure being used more with plants. For animal tissue, you usually add Trizol directly onto the tissue while it's still frozen, or just thawed (preferably still frozen).
In our laboratory, we usually aliquot enough tissue mass for extraction (between 50 and 100 mg) into a new tube free of DNAses and RNAses, and immediately add 1 mL of Trizol. This sample is then homogenized using the BioSpec Tissue Tearor (we've tried other brands and never got good results) or a pestle. To ensure that you preserve RNA, it's important to follow the protocol steps rigorously, minimizing any contamination by endonucleases as much as possible. Use gloves and reagents suitable for molecular biology and good laboratory practices. With mouse tissue, you probably won't have any problems. The link recommended by Uma Dharshini K Vijayamuthuramalingam is very worth reading. You should also read the complete Trizol protocol, Troubleshooting, and FAQs.
Sincerely,
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Please send me some standardized manual protocols for the extraction of RNA from Streptomyces sp.
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Extracting RNA from Streptomyces species can be challenging due to their complex cell walls and the presence of secondary metabolites. However, there are several manual protocols available that have been successfully used for RNA extraction from Streptomyces. Here is a standardized manual protocol that you can try:
Materials:
  • Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer (pH 8.0)
  • Lysozyme
  • Proteinase K
  • Phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1)
  • Chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1)
  • Isopropanol
  • Ethanol (70% and 100%)
  • RNase-free water
  • DEPC-treated water
  • RNase inhibitor (optional)
Protocol:
  1. Harvest Streptomyces cells by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in TE buffer (pH 8.0).
  2. Add lysozyme to a final concentration of 10 mg/ml and incubate the suspension at 37°C for 30 minutes to lyse the cells.
  3. Add proteinase K to a final concentration of 100 μg/ml and incubate the suspension at 55°C for 1 hour to degrade proteins.
  4. Add an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), mix gently by inverting the tubes, and centrifuge at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C.
  5. Transfer the aqueous phase (top layer) to a new tube, avoiding the interface and the organic phase.
  6. Add an equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1), mix gently by inverting the tubes, and centrifuge at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C.
  7. Again, transfer the aqueous phase to a new tube, avoiding the interface and the organic phase.
  8. Precipitate the RNA by adding 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and 2.5 volumes of cold absolute ethanol. Mix well by inverting the tubes and incubate at -20°C for at least 1 hour or overnight.
  9. Centrifuge the tubes at 12,000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C to pellet the RNA.
  10. Carefully remove the supernatant without disturbing the RNA pellet.
  11. Wash the RNA pellet with 1 ml of 70% ethanol, centrifuge at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C, and carefully remove the supernatant.
  12. Air-dry the RNA pellet for 10-15 minutes or until the ethanol evaporates completely.
  13. Resuspend the RNA pellet in 20-50 μl of DEPC-treated water or RNase-free water.
  14. Optional: Add RNase inhibitor to the RNA solution to protect it from degradation.
  15. Store the RNA at -80°C or use it immediately for downstream applications such as RT-PCR, qPCR, or RNA sequencing.
This protocol should yield RNA of sufficient quality and quantity for downstream applications. However, optimization may be required based on the specific Streptomyces species and growth conditions used in your experiments. Additionally, using RNase-free reagents and equipment throughout the protocol is essential to prevent RNA degradation.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Hello Fellow researchers !
I am doing RLM 5'RACE to validate mirRNA cleavage on it's target genes using GeneRacer kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After when purified mRNA using Dynabeads where i used ~32ug of RNA and yielded 17ng/ul for 20ul of volume. After searching i found it is potentially more than 1% of of my original RNA (~32) which i moved ahead with ligation step. I followed this link from page 22 https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2Fgeneracer_man.pdf and once i finished i ran 1ug of ligated mRNA with 1 ul of 6X loading dye and 2ul of water. I don't see anything on the gel except my ladder, is it normal? I was wondering if SYBR stain is good to stain mRNA or since this time i diluted mRNA to run on the gel and it was pretty less amount of mRNA which is why i did not see anything.
it would be really helpful to get your comments :)
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Sameena, did you expect such a small product? (it does not look fine for me...) did you make the PCR? (if it is OK you should get a clear well defined band; do you have an idea of the size of the final product you could expect?
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
Using a standard rt qPCR kit. When looking at non human miRNA species there is a sort of 'background level' of expression in my results when there shouldnt be - i have tried running samples of pbs, Te buffer, RNA storage solution, H20 as a negative control and they all express at around 33 Cts - i have tried opening new RT kit, new qPCR master mix, new assays/primers, new pipettes, changed all equipment, completing in a pcr hood, all new reagents and a different lab ensirely. I use bleach, RNAseaway and ethanol all the time to remove any contamination. Still no change. I dont believe its from contamination at this stage because of how 'stable' every repeat is - I tried a stabiliser also and that is always clear too, which is also evidence it is not contamination going on here. Any sort of buffer seems to express at ct 33 has any one else experienced this? Do i have my threshold wrong on my qPCR machine? is there something going on with the sequence binding? Please help ! any advice appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Really, any PCR-based reaction will tend to produce weird stuff if you leave it long enough: when the reaction is exponential, anything, anything that the primers can bind (including the taqman probe, and themselves) to will tend to end up being amplified. Even if the binding affinity is terrible and the chances are almost zero, it only needs to happen once to get something that can be amplified by subsequent rounds.
But that's usually ok: Cq of 33 is very, very close to the barest minimum quantification anyway (rule of thumb is that Cq 35 roughly corresponds to a single target molecule per well), and if your miR of interest is routinely present at Cq values comparable to your 'background' Cq of 33, then it's safe to conclude that your miR of interest isn't meaningfully present.
In my experience, miRs are usually fairly robustly expressed (Cq 20-26) or not at all (Cq 33+).
It honestly sounds to me like you're wasting a lot of time, energy and effort trying to remove non-existent contamination: this isn't contamination, it's just the way your assay works, and that's...ok: assays are rarely perfect.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Has anyone extracted total RNA from stained H&E slides? We have cases in our study that have no tissue left in the FFPE blocks, and no other tumor source.
Relevant answer
Answer
We typically employ the TRIZOL method for extracting total RNA from tissues. I am unsure if the TRIZOL method can be used in this case, but I believe it is worth attempting if the dye does not interfere with the TRIZOL reagent and does not degrade the RNA.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
9 answers
Hi all,
I have been trying to synthesize luciferase self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) by in vitro transcription (IVT), and this vector has approximately 11kb. The main problem is that I am getting a product of approximately 8kb. (p.s. I am using the NEB HiScribe kit)
I have linearised my plasmid with MluI and the bands on the gel seem to be fine (see the picture attached). Upon completing my RNA IVT, I usually get a good RNA yield that is around 800-1000 ng/ul.
The main problem seems to be the premature termination of the polymerase, hence the shorter RNA product. Does anyone know if there could be other causes for this? Or how to prevent premature termination?
Many thanks,
Beatriz
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Beatriz, have you resolved your problem with shorter than expected IVT RNA? I'm having the same problem. Any suggestions will help!
Thanks
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
I encounter the following problem: I want to send viral RNA for further analysis. As the receiver requires, I must process my samples according to a regular RNA extraction protocol and send the filtered spin columns from the RNA extraction kit, without performing the final elution step. But I don't have the original sample preserved, only the RNA already extracted is stored. Can I do a re-extraction using the stored eluate as the starting material?
Relevant answer
Answer
I believe that, even if your RNA sample is pure, making its making up its volume to 200 µL will be OK because most columns have high affinity for RNA. No doubt, you will lose some RNA, but I hope it will be enough for you analysis.
Secondly, don’t worry about RNA degradation at 56°C for 15 minutes because we routinely perform proteinase K treatment at 55°C overnight to separate RNA from proteins. Secondly RNA is exposed to 70°C for 10 minutes for melting before cDNA synthesis.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
6 answers
Hi everybody,
Im trying to isolate RNA from umbilical cord total tissue by nitrogen freezing and powdering and then Qiazol/Choloroform extraction. I have obtained good results with placental total tissue but with cord the problem is that the pellet is very viscous, and when I try to solubilize it in water to quantify, I cannot even to pippete because of this.
Could anyone show me a protocol to do this?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Francisco,
I am also curious if you succeed with RNA isolation. I am having the same problem; my pellet is very viscous, and I am looking for a solution right now.
Thanks,
Tetiana
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Total RNA concentrations aren't bad, but the PCR never comes out. What can I do?
Relevant answer
Answer
In general I agree with Hongdao Zhang ...can you provide more information about the yield and the purity of your RNA isolation... Few studies normalize circulating lncRNAs with miR-16 or other snRNAs.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
I have tried isolating RNA from dead roots with no success. We call them dead just because they are discolored and black/dark brown but not sure if that means they are completely dead. I have tried many RNA isolation methods but none works for these particular roots.
Any insights?
Relevant answer
Answer
Katie A S Burnette we have ground the roots as best possible, but I have not tried that kit yet. Maybe I can give it a try.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
RNA
I have found some trouble with succesfully extracting RNA from ToBRFV infected tomatoplant samples. Currently I am using the MolGen 96-prep machine. When I put RNA on 1% agarosegel it is all smeared and lowered in the gel.
cDNA
For cDNA synthesis I am using random primers (100 µM), Maxima reverse transcriptase (1:5) 0,1 µL per sample, RNase free water, RT-buffer, DNTP's (10 µM). I use 2 µL of RNA to synthesis. PCR programme as followed:
25◦C 10 min
65 °C 30 min
4 °C 3 min
50 °C 42 min
85 °C 5 min
12 °C ꚙ
I can use some tips and advice to improve these experiments. Because I am working on this for 6 months now without some useful results.
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
I guess you are using one of the Plant PurePathogen kits.
You also need to make sure that your PCR primers are working and have an appropriate positive control to test them.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hi!
I'm using the TRIsure method to isolate proteins and RNA from tissue (the procedure is similar to Trizol method). I usually store the RNA precipitacion with isopropanol at -20°C overnight for the next day I get the pellet. Could RNA be left in isopropanol more days, like all weekend, without effects on quality? Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Hector Javier Lasso Avila Great! Thank you for your quick reply!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Does anyone have any protocols?
Relevant answer
Answer
You should be fine using the standard kit instructions as you can use anywhere from 0.01 pg to 1 ug of starting RNA, it's a huge dynamic range. Your 100 ng/ul is well within the recommended amount of starting material (if you use 1 ul that's 100 ng or 0.1 ug). Hope this helps!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Does anyone have a protocol/experience with extracting total protein or RNA from formalin or PFA fixed tissues that have not been paraffin embedded? I want to extract protein/RNA from mouse brains that were fixed by perfusion with 10% neutral buffered formalin. Older samples are cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, but if I can cut a piece of tissue before the sucrose step that is also doable.
I want to perfuse my mice to better preserve tissues for cryosectioning and IHC, but it would be nice to use less animals and perform less surgeries especially since I only need little protein or RNA to run Western blots or RT-qPCR experiments and it seems a shame spend extra time and mice.
I have searched the literature and see many papers discussing techniques for FFPE sections, but no discussion of fixed tissues that are not paraffin embedded or mounted on slides.
Relevant answer
Answer
We extract protein from the coronary artery from formulin perfused bodies from the Medical School. We use the same protocol as from FFPE tissues, but they are not embedded in paraffin. We are able to get protein out (unless the tissues have been fixed for a long time, then the protein is degraded). Here is the paper with the protocol that we use: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.657313. You will just skip the deparaffinization methods. The extraction buffer that we use is the RIPA LB. I also attached my preprint so you could see the Western blot analysis from the protein that was extracted (Figure 2A). Please let me know if you have any questions. Hope this helps!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
7 answers
I use a DNA/RNA synthesizer from LGC (Biosearch), a MerMade6, to make oligos. The machine has operated for around 16 months and produced about 1500 oligos during this period. As you can see, it is not a heavily used machine.
All preventive maintenances were ok, and the machine was operating just fine and yielding very good quality oligos......
But then it started to present a misalignment between the cart/columns block and the capilaries, pouring reagents out of the columns.
If you look closely you can see that, when the cart with the columns moves and gets to the position assigned, it doesn't stop completely, but slides juuuust a little bit instead. Such a mess!
Calibration doesn't solve the problem: after a calibration, reagents will be delivered correctly into the columns in the first cycle, but as with every move the cart slides a little bit, the misalignment starts to sum up with every move and, at the 3rd cycle, reagents are being spilled outside the columns already.
We are in Brazil. Remotely, LGC team couldn't help. They couldn't even find the problem. The visit of LGC engineering team will coast a lot, and while we are working in resources an bureaucracies to get them here, tips from other users would be welcome and much appreciated.
This machine works with step motor / step motion, which is similar to printers and a lot of other machines. Have you ever seen this kind of issue?
Alternatively, do you know other MerMade users you can put me in touch with?
Thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks, Andrei!
I certainly did! I took pictures and I have a meeting with them scheduled for tomorrow!
Maybe they won't replace it because the machine is out of warranty... But I'll make some noise anyway, that brought us a lot of trouble!
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
We are slicing our human hippocampus with cryostat and wanted to know how much RNA (in ug) can you obtain from a cryostat slice? Obviously it depends on the thickness, but if anyone has any insight, please share!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, I copied the link of a very detailed article about RNA extracted from cryostat slices of a mouse tibial.
I don't known the dimension of a human hippocampus, but, maybe, this can used as comparison.
Valeria
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Hello RG Hivemind,
For RNAseq of Aspergillus (or other filamentous fungi) with Oxford nanopore MinION, I am wondering:
1. What is the expected percent yield purified mRNA from total RNA? From a cursory search, a range from 1 to 5 % mRNA/total RNA seems standard at a broad taxonomic scale, but what is your experience with fungi?
2. Anyone done PCR-free direct cDNA sequencing with Aspergillus? With low mRNA concentration we may investigate PCR-cDNA sequencing instead.
Some background:
Using liquid N2 mortar-pestle homogenization and Qiagen RNeasy Plant Mini Kit we extracted total RNA from Aspergillus (cultured on liquid media) mycelia with good yield (~300 ng/μl, Qubit IQ integrity = 10).
Using this total RNA as input to the Oxford Nanopore direct cDNA sequencing kit, cDNA synthesis was performed on four input concentrations of total RNA ranging from 0.5 to 5 μg, resulting in a cDNA yield plateauing around 1.75 ng/μl (see attached image; analyzed after RNA degradation and second strand synthesis but before End Prep and Barcode Ligation).
Given that 70 to 200 ng of cDNA are required as input for End Prep and barcode ligation, my cDNA yield is prohibitively low, but perhaps not lower than is expected given the small fraction of mRNA in the input total RNA?
Of course, why not purify the mRNA before cDNA synthesis? Using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module with 2 μg input total RNA, effectively all mRNA was lost resulting in below 1ng/μl yields of low purity mRNA, if any.
So my choice is between:
(A) troubleshooting mRNA purification until yield is high enough (≥100ng for direct cDNA sequencing or ≥1ng for PCR-cDNA sequencing), or
(B) use ≥50ng total RNA as input for PCR-cDNA sequencing.
I used the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module previously with wasp tissues and had no issue getting good mRNA yield from the insect total RNA. So I am puzzled and open to advice from anyone working in this area :) Thank you in advance for your time and your advice!
- Andrew Legan
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Andrew,
Thanks very much for your answer. We have also not had any issues with the polyA selection service performed by sequence providers, but in this case we are trying to obtain mRNA for a yeast one-hybrid screen. Given the NEB mRNA isolation kit seems to work fine on total RNA from non-fungal organisms, we figured that there must be some kind of inhibitors coming through with the fungal RNA. We have now tried with fungal RNA that we processed further with multiple sodium acetate precipitation steps to remove carbohydrate, which is a common contaminant of fungal RNA preps. This increased mRNA yields from ~1.5 ng/µL to ~20 ng/µL (300 ng output from 50 µg input using the large-scale kit) - still not great, but a definite improvement!
Cheers,
Daniel
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Does anyone know which tubes the PAXgene Blood RNA Tube corresponds to? Are they EDTA tubes or Heparin tubes?
Best regards,
Hind Sebbah
Relevant answer
Answer
they are their own tubes with proprietary preservative in them. they should be collected last at the draw
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hello, I am currently isolating nuclei from adipose tissue and I am interested in obtaining high-quality RNA for further assays. What extraction methods do you recommend?
I´m currently using the TRIzol protocol, without modifications but in addition to obtaining very little amount of RNA, the ​​280/260 and 280/230 values are very low, any suggestions?
Relevant answer
Answer
i agree with Emilee Bargoma RNA from tissue can be tough. are you getting good nuclear isolation? if so then use a lysis buffer with sodium dexoycholate (RIPA) to help punch holds in the membrane and lyse on ice for up to 30 minutes then perform RNA isolation. if you are not using a column then be very conservative when you are transferring phases and err on the side of less but clean RNA rather than trying to get every single ul of aqueous phase
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
Colleagues, tell me which dye is optimal for staining RNA during gel electrophoresis? Which one do you use in your laboratory?
Relevant answer
Answer
Formaldehyde Load Dye.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
13 answers
I am trying to adapt a DNA extraction protocol to allow me to extract both RNA and DNA from the same sample. I plan to put the sample through Qiagen Allprep DNA/RNA mini kit, but I am not sure at what step I lose the RNA.
SDS/CTAB cleanup
a. Add 10 μl SDS (10%) + 1 μl proteinase K (10 mg/ml stock) to each tube and incubate at 56 °C for 20 min. At this point, pre-incubate CTAB/NaCl solution at 65 °C.
b. Add 35 μl NaCl (5 M) + 28.1 μl CTAB/NaCl (2.5%). Pulse vortex. Incubate at 65 °C for 10 min then perform a quick spin.
c. Add 200 μl phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) pH 8.0. Pulse vortex. Centrifuge 8,000 × g for 5 min at RT.
d. Collect the aqueous fraction. Add 200 μl chloroform. Pulse vortex for 3–5 sec. Centrifuge 8,000 × g for 5 min at RT.
e. Collect the aqueous fraction. This is final Virus Nucleic Acid.
The final viral nucleic acid goes through the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit.
I am not sure if the final nucleic acid contains RNA. If it does not contain RNA, I would like to know at which step I should put my sample through the kit.
I read protocols using CTAB to extract RNA as well as DNA, but I am not so sure about phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol or plain chloroform. I read a similar protocol for extracting RNA that used CTAB and phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol, but they replaced the chloroform with isopropanol and centrifuged, collecting the pellet as final RNA.
If someone could help me sort this out, it would be great!
FYI, this is part of a protocol to enrich for viral particles and extract the nucleic acid from stool with the least amount of human or bacterial contamination.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello,
In the context of RNA extraction, both phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and plain chloroform have been traditionally used, each serving specific roles in the process of isolating high-quality RNA.
  1. Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl Alcohol: This mixture is commonly used in RNA extraction protocols for its effectiveness in separating nucleic acids from proteins. The phenol denatures proteins and facilitates their partitioning into the organic phase, while chloroform enhances the separation of the aqueous and organic phases. Isoamyl alcohol, typically added in a smaller proportion (e.g., 25:24:1 phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol), helps in reducing foaming and also aids in the phase separation. When this mixture is added to an aqueous solution containing RNA, upon centrifugation, it forms two phases: an aqueous phase (containing RNA) and an organic phase (containing proteins and lipids). The RNA in the aqueous phase can then be further purified.
  2. Plain Chloroform: Plain chloroform can also be used in RNA extraction, primarily to remove phenol (if used in previous steps) or to further purify the RNA. When used after a phenol treatment, chloroform helps to eliminate residual phenol from the aqueous phase, which is crucial because phenol can interfere with downstream applications such as RT-PCR. Chloroform alone is less effective than the phenol:chloroform mixture in separating RNA from proteins and DNA, but it's a valuable step in ensuring the removal of potential contaminants.
  3. Protocol Considerations: It’s important to follow the protocol's specific guidelines for the use of these chemicals, including the ratios and volumes. The choice between using phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol or plain chloroform will depend on the nature of the sample, the presence of contaminants, and the specific requirements of the downstream applications.
  4. Safety and Handling: Both phenol and chloroform are toxic and require careful handling under a fume hood, with appropriate personal protective equipment. Their disposal must also adhere to safety and environmental regulations.
  5. RNA Quality and Yield: The quality and yield of RNA obtained can be affected by factors such as the pH of the phenol used (acidic phenol is often used for DNA extraction, while neutral or slightly alkaline phenol is preferred for RNA), the integrity of the sample, and the thoroughness of the phase separation.
In summary, both phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and plain chloroform have roles in RNA extraction, with the choice and use depending on the specific requirements of the RNA extraction protocol and the nature of the sample. Proper handling and adherence to protocols are essential for obtaining high-quality RNA suitable for downstream applications.
Check out this protocol list; it might provide additional insights for resolving the issue.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
I have performed RNA extraction of blood sample using TRIzol method. I ran RNA samples on non-denaturing gel (1.5%) that showed extreme DNA contamination and degraded RNA band. Please suggest me how should I overcome this issue.
Relevant answer
Answer
Right, so...again: whole blood won't have a lot of DNA in it. Most of your RNA will be from erythrocytes, but maybe that's what you want.
And again: DNA contamination is only a problem if you make it a problem. Design primers to span introns (this means gDNA won't be amplified), but even if you can't do this, you can just run -RT controls and empirically demonstrate that gDNA contamination (if present) is sufficiently low so as to leave your conclusions unaffected.
Basically, if you run a qPCR with cDNA samples prepared without reverse transcriptase (such that all that can be amplified is genomic DNA contamination), and all your Cq values are ~6 cycles higher than they are when using proper cDNA, then...you really don't need to worry: this corresponds to a 64-fold difference, i.e. genomic DNA represents <2% of your total signal.
qPCR is for detecting pretty large fold changes in gene expression, not very subtle changes: a consistent but very low background contribution from gDNA can be safely ignored.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
I have used STAT60 to isolate RNA successfully. I am wanting to collect RNA and protein from tissues, and according to the manufacturer's information I could allegedly use STAT60 to collect both types of molecules. What I would ideally like to do is precipitate both RNA and protein from the same tissues and submit the protein for mass spectrometry. Has anyone used STAT60-isolated proteins successfully for mass spectrometry?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Katherine,
the question is what you are looking at. Are you going to perform MS for global proteomics analysis via digestion (InGel or InSolution)and LC-MS of the peptides or pergorm MALDI-MS to identify single proteins after InGel digestion?
However be aware that in the STAT60 procedure precipitation of proteins is included which can result in different recovery of proteins between samples to compare and also can lead to a bias towards proteins which are precipitating easier with the used technique and therefore possibly lead to a loss of proteins which are not precipitating iso well.
You also need to consider that if you want to perform an InSolution digestion of the precipitated proteins for global LC-MS based proteomics you need to resuspend the protein pellet in an appropriate buffer or if you want to use the solubilisation buffer of 1% SDS, 10M Urea which is proposed in the STAT60 protocol (At this point I am wondering how they are able to resolve 10M Urea without heating?), You can use the FASP (Filter Aided Sample preparation method for the digestion.of your proteins.
Good Luck
Murat
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
I tried to use RNAase to study protein and I have tried to digest protein to get nucleic acid also. The problem is yield is low and RNA is fragmented. I am trying to purify both of them in functional form. Can anyone please guide me with it? Thanks a lot.
Relevant answer
Answer
It might be possible to remove the RNA from the protein by chromatography on a heparin column.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
I am currently collecting 1k-100k cells through FACS sorting for qPCR and RNA-seq. Several online protocols suggest sorting cells directly into TRIzol, and I have found this method effective for cell collection and RNA extraction. However, I am concerned about the aerosolization of TRIzol during this process. Does anyone have suggestions or best practices to prevent TRIzol aerosolization during FACS sorting?
Relevant answer
Answer
Didier Poncet Thank you for your comment. My concern is that aerosolization of TRIzol might occur when the sorted cells come into contact with it, due to the high-speed flow during the sorting process.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
Hi,
I extracted total cellular RNA from HEK293T cells by using a commercial kit. I left samples untreated or treated with 2ul RNaseA/T1 mixture (invitrogen) in the presence of PBS or protein lysis buffer NP40 (because I will use RNase in the presence of lysis buffer later). The labels of shared gel pic are as follows:
1) 1kb NEB DNA ladder
2) 500ng total RNA
3) 500ng total RNA incubated at 37C for 30min in the presence of water (untreated)
4) 500ng total RNA incubated at 37C for 30min in the presence of 1X PBS (treated)
5) 500ng total RNA incubated at 37C for 30min in the presence of lysis buffer (treated)
6) 100bp Promega Benchtop DNA ladder
1) Why there is only one thick band in 2 and 3 but no band or smear in 4? Why there is a band shift in 5?
I ran non-denaturing 1% agarose gel in TAE buffer at 30V.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Didier. I will re extract the good quality RNA to validate the results. Although the quality of RNA was not good but can I still assume that absence of any visible band in 3 means the positive activity of RNase?
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
I want to check mRNA expression levels in these NPWT samples. Is there any way to isolate RNA from these? I tried TriZol based extraction but all I got was a smear (considering the samples were thawed multiple times, I expected this).
Thank You
Relevant answer
Answer
Multiple freeze-thaw cycles can cause the RNA in your samples to degrade. If the RNA is already degraded, then no extraction method will work. For your TriZol-extracted samples, are you able to see 28S and 18S bands? The 28S:18S ratio should be approximately 2:1.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
I am having problems with the stability of a microRNA against exo/endonucleases in serum. I have seen that there are several modifications to make it more resistant, including modification with phosphothiorates. My question is where and how to place these modifications along the RNA strand and how can they also affect the recognition by intracellular RNase H?
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
You could use a T7 self splicing intron to make your RNA circular which would protect against exonucleases.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
I have performed 3 RNA isolations on Jurkat cells using the phenol-chloroform principle, using Omega Bio-Tek RNA Solv® & following the protocol. I took care in not disturbing the separated phases when removing two thirds of the aqeous phases but the data I get when I measure the 260/280 & 260'/230nm absorbance ratios lead me to suspect contamination of the samples with phenol or other reagents.
Most of the samples have a 260/280 ratio below 1,6 and only one sample has a 260/230 ratio that comes close to 2 (1,84 to be exact). Subsequent cDNA synthesis & RT-qPCR have not resulted in genes of interest to show any fluoresence at all, only the housekeeping genes in 2 of 7 samples showed up. Problems with primers & RT-qPCR were ruled out as the same setup yielded viable results previously.
Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with Julie Ann Dougherty . RNA quality can be affected by impurities like phenol which can be carried over to samples. Residual phenol is assumed to inhibit PCR reactions by denaturation of enzymes such as polymerases and reverse transcriptase in a concentration dependent manner. So, try to use lower concentration of RNA than what you would be presently using.
You may want to refer to the articles attached below for more information.
Best.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Hi everyone,
I ran a 1% agarose in 1X TAE with SybrSafe. I ran same mRNA (left well: undenatured, right well: denatured). The only difference is that right band mRNA was denatured at 72'C for 3 min and cooled on ice for 2 min prior to gel running. Why does undenatured mRNA shows up as two peaks and not one?
Thanks,
Maria
Relevant answer
Answer
The non-denatured mRNA migrates in two forms: (i) as a higher order structure (due to secondary structures inherent to RNAs); this form seems to dominate; and (ii) as a form without these secondary structures formed. Denaturing then abolishes formation of the secondary structures, resulting in one band, which should correspond in size to the length of the mRNA.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
I have tried to extract RNA from fish semen and testis using the RNEasy kit and also have the PureLink RNA kit. I have tried a few modifications I've found online, but the RNA comes either highly degraded, despite what a simple gel run would suggest, or contaminated with other biomolecules. When trying to initially homogenize the tissue it becomes extremely gelatinous and therefore impossible to pipette, and unfortunately I do not have sophisticated equipment to use beads and other methods, although I am inclined to think the sample would still be too gelatinous for this method. I haven't found many references using liquid nitrogen to homogenize the tissues, so any past experiences would be highly appreciated. Also, if anyone has some suggestions for any of the two kits' protocols it would be appreciated too. I've read the addition of AGPC could be useful in this case.
Thanks to everyone in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Did you try to load your sample on a shredder column before the extraction?
it helps with saliva.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
8 answers
Hello Fellow researchers !!!!
I have been trying to isolate mRNA from extracted RNA (Alfalfa Plant leaves) using Dynabeads mRNA purification kit. I have been following the protocol exactly the same but used 32ug (100ul) of RNA instead of 75ug and was eluting in 20ul . I used exactly the same proportion of reagents as mentioned in the protocol. Still i got very less yield ~ 17ng/ul. The concentration of RNA was 319.7ng/ul from which i was trying to extract mRNA. I was following the given protocol .. https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2FMAN0015808_Dynabeads_mRNA_Purification_UG.pdf .. please let me know if anyone has some opinions on it... it would be really helpful :)
Relevant answer
Answer
So from my reading you put in 32ug = 32,000ng of RNA, and you got out 17ng/uL * 20uL = 340ng of mRNA? That's just over 1% recovery which in my experience is pretty normal. Most total RNA samples contain 1-5% mRNA depending on the cell type and you'll never get back all of it, so honestly 1% is pretty good. What do you intend to do with the mRNA? 340ng of poly(A) selected mRNA is quite a lot and it should be plenty for most downstream workflows.
If you do want to try to optimise recovery, the first thing you should do is check your RNA integrity because poly(A) selection yield is extremely dependent on input sample quality. Do you have access to a BioAnalyzer or TapeStation to check the integrity of your input sample?
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
5 answers
RNA and DNA
Relevant answer
Answer
Your profile shows a degree in microbiology, hopefully this topic was covered. I'm concerned that someone with an advanced degree lacks resources to answer this sort of basic question.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
During RNA FISH, the fluorescent probes are hybridized with target RNAs with 20-24bp base pairing.
But how strong this interaction is with only several hydogen bonds?
How much salt or fomamide are needed for break this interaction?
Relevant answer
Answer
You can check NUPACK to calculate your exact break solution concentration. Moreover you can just use DNaseI to remove the probes or use high concentration formamide(about ~60%)
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Hi
I isolated RNA samples from cells and made cDNA.
In the case of troubleshooting, I would like to validate my RNA sample by looking at 18s and 28s.
but I don't know how to do it. I have searched the protocol but it didn't clearly show it up.
can you help me out?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Jae Hyo Lee,
The most common method to check the integrity of your RNA samples is to run an aliquot of your samples on a denaturing agarose gel and later stain the gel with ethidium bromide. Sometimes you may have to use Sybrgold instead of the traditional ethidium bromide to stain the gel in order to increase the sensitivity.
The denaturing gel system is suggested because most RNA form extensive secondary structure via intramolecular base pairing, and this prevents it from migrating strictly according to its size.
If your RNA sample is intact, you will get a clear, sharp 28S and 18S rRNA bands for eukaryotic samples. The intensity of the two bands 28S:18S should be in the ratio 2:1 which is an indication that your RNA sample is intact. Partially degraded RNA will have a smeared appearance and will not show the 2:1 ratio as that seen for intact RNA. Completely degraded RNA will be seen as a low molecular weight smear.
For the protocol, you may refer to the link provided below.
Best.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
5 answers
We are currently working on a project involving the extraction of DNA and RNA from various types of animal samples, such as whole blood, serum, faeces, etc. The objective is to detect various pathogens through Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Our approach for each animal is to combine all the extracted DNA and RNA (converted to cDNA) together (e.g., its DNA from faeces + RNA from faeces + RNA from serum + ...), thus reducing the number of samples to be processed during library preparation.
We have an extraction kit that allows us to either extract DNA and RNA together in a single tube, or extract DNA in one tube and RNA in a different tube. Since our intention is to mix them anyway, we are considering the former option. Nevertheless, we are uncertain whether this will impact the RNA-to-cDNA conversion. Will the presence of DNA affect the conversion process? Additionally, are there any potential effects on the integrity of the DNA? While extracting DNA and RNA together would offer significant benefits in terms of saving time, consumables, and reagents, we will not proceed with this option if it might adversely affect the quality of our extracted DNA or RNA.
Thank you very much for your time and assistance.
Relevant answer
Answer
The presence of genomic DNA in the sample can be considered as a contaminant because of that during running Real time PCR, it affects quantity of cDNA (which is expected to come from expressed genes/transcripts). Since some DNA probes can bind to any double stranded DNA molecules, the presence of genomic DNA can affect quantification of cDNA.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
I want to extract RNA from blood sample and storing the phenol layer that contain proteins without processing, is this will affect the protein?
Relevant answer
Answer
You will have to precipitate out the DNA from the lower, organic phenol-chloroform phase which contains both DNA as well as protein. The DNA may be precipitated out by the addition of ethanol, and the proteins may remain in the phenol-ethanol supernatant.
The paper attached below has demonstrated that the proteins isolated from samples stored as phenol-ethanol supernatants for up to 3 years at −20°C did not suffer from significant degradation as assessed by Western blot analysis.
The proteins may be recovered from phenol-ethanol supernatant by either precipitation or by dialysis, although the dialyzed pellets are significantly easier to solubilize and thereby result in better recovery efficiency. A combination of 0.05% SDS and 4 M urea in Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, will allow for complete solubilization of dialyzed pellets without apparent decrease in the integrity of the isolated proteins.
You may want to refer to the below attached article for more information.
Best.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
Kidney RNA extraction
Relevant answer
Answer
Looks you want RNA from outer layer of kidney. Is it not possible for you to do microdissection under microscope and dissect the ourer layer. I will also recommend to do microdissection when whole kidney is under RNALATER solution, that will protect from RNAases
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
I would like to know if it is a common reagent kit for the target amplification of both DNA and RNA, or does it show amplification only for the RNA targets. Will the presence of DNA in the sample affect the reaction and its results?
Relevant answer
Answer
YES, you can, just before starting you have to add a step of RT deactivation (e.g. 94°C for 10 min) at the beginning of your PCR thermoprofile. However, the cost of the run will be more expensive when using RT-mastermix than ordinary PCR-mastermix.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
When I ran qPCR on my samples, some of them returned N/A results (I replicated it twice, and the replicated sample returned Cq value results), so I decided to run qPCR on the same samples again. The sample that previously gave N/A results turned out to have Cq values. What does this mean? And what are the possible issues that cause the first run to return N/A results in some samples?
 
 
Example (because I am not fluent in English, using the example will make it easier to understand that we are on the same page):
 
Sample A:
Gene A -> Cq: N/A
Gene B -> Cq: 36.55
Gene C -> Cq: 35.75
Sample A (replicated):
Gene A -> Cq: 34.78
Gene B -> Cq: 35.97
Gene C -> Cq: 36.12
 
And because gene A of sample A gave N/A as a result, I decided to run qPCR with the same sample again (to see if it could give me a Cq value).
Sample A:
Gene A -> Cq: 35.04
Gene B -> Cq: N/A
Gene C -> Cq: N/A
 
Sample A (replicated):
Gene A -> Cq: N/A
Gene B -> Cq: N/A
Gene C -> Cq: N/A
Relevant answer
Answer
Cq of 35-36 is basically "there was a single target molecule in this well". It's usually the highest Cq value you can get before you hit "N/A".
So exactly like Katie A S Burnette says, what you have here is things like "one, none, none" or "none, one, none".
Your target is there, maybe.
Now you can use more cDNA, potentially, but PCR is exponential: you'd need to add a LOT more to substantially change matters. Twice as much would really only give you results like "none, two, one", at best.
Unless you're already using cDNA at incredibly high dilution, I don't think "adding more" will really change the conclusion that your target is there, maybe.
So you would then need to consider whether "is there, maybe" really represents a finding of biological consequence: it might be detectable, but only just, and only because PCR is incredibly sensitive. If you can barely detect it, can it really be contributing, meaningfully, to your biological scenario?
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hi everyone,
I would highly appreciate it if anyone could answer how phosphorothioates will affect DNA/RNA's synthesis and purification. If there are more than one phosphorothioates present in the DNA/RNA strand, will there be crosslinking? Can phosphorothioates form disulfide bonds? If no, what could be the major crosslinking format?
Thanks,
Yiqun
Relevant answer
Answer
Your question is too general to be answered in a few sentences. PS do not influence the synthesis to a major extent except for two points:
1. The capping step is conducted after the sulfurization.
2. If an oligo contains both PS and PO linkages, the oxidation to the PO should be done under milder conditions to prevent desulfurization. Iodine should not exceed 0.05 M concentration. Alternatively, tBuOOH/MeCN can be used, with the contact time of 15 min.
In reversed-phase purification, 5'-DMT oligos with PS usually give more than one peak. IE HPLC, in contrast, gives a single peak. In IE, PS oligos are eluted slower than the respective PS. To elute an oligo with high percentage of PS, the use of a strong chaotropic salt (e.c. NaBr) plus 10 to 15% MeCN in buffer B is mandatory.
Formation of intra- or intermolecular disulfides during the synthesis, deprotection, or isolation is not observed. This can probably be done by a mild activation of one pf the phosphorothioates with, for instance, dipyridyl disulfide. I however think that the disulfide formed might be unstable to mild basic hydrolysis to form one PS plus one PO.
There is plenty of literature on the subject of the synthesis and purification of PS oligos. Getting familiar with the subject will save you a lot of time and grief in the lab.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Any suggestion on microarrays (protein/ DNA/ RNA) that measure enzymes in the phospholipid metabolism pathways? Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Several companies offer microarray kits and services that can be used to analyze gene expression levels, including those related to phospholipid metabolism. Some well-known providers of microarray technology and related products include:
  1. Affymetrix (Thermo Fisher Scientific): Affymetrix provides a range of microarray products, including GeneChip® arrays that can be used for gene expression analysis in various biological processes, including lipid metabolism.
  2. Agilent Technologies: Agilent offers microarray platforms and related solutions for gene expression profiling, including customized microarray services that can be tailored for specific research needs, such as studies of lipid metabolism-related genes.
  3. Illumina: Illumina offers microarray-based gene expression analysis platforms, including the Infinium® arrays, for studying large-scale gene expression profiles in different biological pathways, including those related to lipid metabolism.
  4. Arrayit Corporation: Arrayit provides microarray technology platforms, custom microarray services, and microarray kits that can be applied to gene expression studies, including the investigation of phospholipid metabolism.
  5. Thermo Fisher Scientific: In addition to Affymetrix products, Thermo Fisher Scientific offers a wide range of microarray solutions, including custom microarray services for gene expression profiling and pathway analysis, which can be utilized in studies of lipid metabolism.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
I have used Trizol method but there has been huge DNA contamination along with shearing.
Relevant answer
Answer
You can try DNA digestion by using the DNase I:
1. Thaw the RNA sample on ice.
2. Add 2 µL of 10× DNase I reaction buffer. Add 1 unit of DNase I per 1–2 µg of RNA. Adjust the final volume to 20 µL with RNase-free H2O. Incubate the sample for 30 min at 37˚C.
3. Inactivate the DNase I by adding 2.5 µL of 25 mM EDTA. Incubate the sample for 5–10 min at 65˚C–75˚C.
4. Centrifuge the sample briefly to collect the contents of the tube, and chill the sample on ice.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
We would like to preserve RNA from mammal blood samples. Unfortunately the only product I am aware is RNA Later and it is very very expensive for our limited budget. Any ideas? Thank you very much
Relevant answer
Answer
To make a homemade alternative for RNA Later, mix 75% ethanol with 25% diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water. Keep it at -20°C. Use this solution to immerse and preserve biological samples for RNA stabilization.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
I am trying to learn RNA quantification from BV2 cell using easy blue reagent. but the RNA quantity is very low. may be the cell density per ml is low. i m using 6well plate . i cant find where i m lacking. so my guess is, may b the cell density is low.. need experts help.
Relevant answer
Answer
As mentioned in the protocol, you should count the cell number and use 3-10 million cells per 1 ml of easy-BLUE.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
i have tried invitrogen pureLink RNA mini kit, and It didn't work
Relevant answer
Answer
Then I would suggest extracting with Trizol and then using the column from your kit to do a cleanup.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
I have red poultry mite samples which have been stored in ethanol. Now I need to perform RNA and DNA extraction followed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. I would like to know if there is a way to successfully extract the nucleic acids so that I have no inhibition or problems during the sequencing run. You opinion and experience is highly appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Pretty much all RNA/DNA extraction kits (Qiagen, Zymo, or even homogenization followed by etoh precip) will remove inhibitors. You may worry more about the degradation of nucleic acid especially if it was stored in ethanol for an extended period of time - you can check that on a Bioanalyzer.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
1 answer
We did not get the RNA pellet after the fase separation. Seems Very difficult to lyse the cells.
Relevant answer
Answer
  1. Harvesting Cells:Grow Geobacillus/Parageobacillus cultures to the desired OD600. Pellet cells by centrifugation at a suitable speed and duration.
  2. Cell Lysis:Resuspend the cell pellet in Trizol reagent, following the manufacturer's instructions. Add chloroform and perform phase separation.
  3. RNA Precipitation:Transfer the aqueous phase to a new tube and precipitate RNA with isopropanol. Centrifuge and wash the RNA pellet with 75% ethanol.
  4. RNA Purification:Air-dry the RNA pellet or use a speed vacuum. Dissolve RNA in RNase-free water or an appropriate buffer.
  5. DNase Treatment:Treat RNA with DNase I to remove genomic DNA contamination.
  6. RNA Quality Control:Assess RNA integrity and purity using gel electrophoresis or a bioanalyzer.
  7. Quantification:Quantify RNA concentration using a spectrophotometer or fluorometer.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
when extraction of RNA save the blood with trizol or serum or plasma
Relevant answer
Answer
There is a debate over whether serum or plasma is the most appropriate sample type to detect both miRNA and RNA expression. Several studies have found that plasma samples provide a higher recovery of miRNA (based on real-time RT-PCR), although others have seen no or minimal difference between serum and plasma.
I feel serum sample would be more appropriate because additional RNA may be released from cells during the coagulation process. Cell lysis, especially the highly abundant red blood cells, during the coagulation process is one of the possible explanations for the RNA concentration difference between serum and plasma. During the coagulation process, blood cells are exposed to a stressful environment which in turn may stimulate the release of certain miRNAs and RNAs. Additionally, the platelets also contain significant amounts of RNA which might also be released into the serum during the coagulation process.
I have attached a few articles below which you may want to refer.
Best.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
4 answers
Hello. This is my first research and I find it kind of hard to do this on my own. I would like to perform gene expression analysis using qRT-PCR. So at firs I extracted RNA from plasma using miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit. I've got really different and low concentrations. For example, 3 RNA samples (elution 20 ul) with concentrations of 6.9 ng/ul, 63.4 ng/ul, 5.4 ng/ul. I have bought High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit for cDNA synthesis. In the methodology is written that I have to take 10 µL of RNA sample and there is no need to make all the RNA samples have the same concentration before taking 10uL, as long as the total RNA that will be included in these 10uL stays between 20pg-2ug (0.002ng/ul-200ng/ul?). Is that true? If no, how can I put the same quantity of RNA to o cDNA with this really low RNA concentration? I know that I should not measure cDNA concentration with nanodrop, but I did and I did get the concentration of 7 samples between 2196.5 and 2404.2 ng/ul. 260/280 from 1.80 to 1.81, 260/230 from 2.04 to 2.22. This will be my first time doing RT-PCR with taqman, I will use GAPDH as housekeeping gene. Do I need to dilute cDNA sample before qRT-PCR?
Relevant answer
Answer
You should definitely dilute your cDNA before using it in qPCR. Too much DNA will inhibit a PCR reaction, and also there are components of the RT reaction that can inhibit qPCR. I use different kits and different amounts than you, but just to give you an idea my cDNA is diluted to 1:50 in the final qPCR reaction.
You don't need to use the same quantity of RNA in the RT reaction across your samples because the qPCR analysis involves an internal normalization step (to the GAPDH housekeeping gene). However, it's a good idea to have roughly similar amounts of RNA in the RT reaction because the reaction can behave differently with very high or very low amounts of RNA.
The last thing I'll say is that if you are measuring your RNA by Nanodrop it will be very inaccurate, especially for low concentrations like your samples. If you have access to a fluorometric method (like Qubit) or an automated electrophoresis apparatus (like a Bioanalyzer), those methods will be much more accurate.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
Hello!!
Can anyone tell what could be the reason to get completely opposite Cts value in 2 different qPCR with same qPCR components?
I was testing a certain primer on different tissues, first time i TurboDNAse treated on 1ug of extracted RNA then made 10ul of CDNA with 0.5ug treated RNA and run qPCR 10ul of reaction
I got CT values pretty high (28-38) except in one tissue where it was around 22Ct.
Second time i wanted to run with reference gene, so i remade cDNA with 0.5ug but with 20ul of cDNA reaction and ran with a bit different cycling conditions.
And i got pretty low CT around 8-12 except the same tissue which had 22 Ct in previous run had Ct 33. So, it was just opposite results.
Can anyone has any idea why it can be?
Regards
Relevant answer
Answer
That will do it! I hope it keeps working :)
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
3 answers
If yes, then how can I interpret the results?
Relevant answer
Answer
I don't see the point in using multiple size markers. Size markers are used to estimate the size of your fragment. If the bands of your marker are too close in the region of your fragment, adjust the concentration of your gel. For instance, for an agarose gel, if the fragment size is in several kilobase pairs, use a low-concentration gel (between 0.4% and 0.8%). If the fragment size is in a few hundred base pairs, use a more concentrated gel (between 1.5% and 2%). I think it's more useful to adjust the gel concentration rather than using multiple different markers.
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
The outline of my experiment is I have fragmented RNA, I will add poly A to the RNA end, and then I design a primer that contains poly T and a specific tail for downstream enrichment. My question is which sequencing method can be applied to the downstream analysis?
Relevant answer
Answer
RNAseq on illumina i miseq or hiseq
  • asked a question related to RNA
Question
2 answers
Hi,
I am trying to extract total RNA from chondrogenic micromass after 14days of chondrogenesis. I have used Qiagen RNAesay plus mini kit. It was extremely difficult to dissolve the micromass in RLT plus buffer. I used qiashredder as well. The RNA yield was extremely low.
I have also tried trizol extraction. Again it was difficult to get the micomass dissovled into trizol. My goal is to check for chondrogenic markers by qPCR.
If any of you have experience of RNA extraction from micromass and could share with me, that would be great.
Thanks,
Nandina.
Relevant answer
Answer
You can crush tissue with small mortar and pestle, tissue under liquid Nitrogen all the time till get into powder. You may need to pool many micromass in one group,
Alternatetively if you want more ex vivo tissue generated, you can generate disc cartilages instead of micromass (see my paper 2016 on my RG