Social Media - Science topic

1)

2)

Hi,

I am a student in business school at the EU in Barcelona and as part of our marketing research class we are doing a report on social media online consumer behaviour. In order to conduct our research, we design a survey destined to professionals to understand and gather data on the impact of social media on online consumer behaviour.

If you want to help us, here is a survey:

Thank you for your consideration.

Many research institutions have included among the main types of threats and risks developing globally in 2023 the question of the increase in the scale of organized disinformation operating in online social media. The diagnosed increase in the scale of disinformation generated in online social media is related to the use of applications available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology. With the help of applications available on the Internet, it is possible without being a computer graphic designer and even without artistic skills to simply and easily create graphics, drawings, photos, images, videos, animations, etc., which can represent graphically professionally created “works” that can depict fictional events. Then, with the help of other applications equipped with generative artificial intelligence technology and advanced language models, i.e. with the help of intelligent chatbots, text can be created to describe specific “fictional events” depicted in the generated images. Accordingly, since the end of 2022, i.e. since the first such intelligent chatbot, i.e. the first versions of ChatGPT, were made available on the Internet, the number of memes, photos, comments, videos, posts, banners, etc. generated with the help of applications equipped with tools based on artificial intelligence technology has been growing rapidly, including the rapid increase in the scale of disinformation generated in this way. In order to limit the scale of the aforementioned disinformation developing in online media, on the one hand, technology companies running social media portals and other online information services are perfecting tools for identifying posts, entries, comments, banners, photos, videos, animations, etc. that contain specific, usually thematic types of disinformation. However, these solutions are not perfect, and the scales of disinformation operating in internecine social media are still high. On the other hand, specific institutions for combating disinformation are being established, NGOs and schools are conducting educational campaigns to make citizens aware of the high scale of disinformation developing on the Internet. In addition, proposed regulations such as the AIAct, which as a set of regulations on the proper use of tools equipped with artificial intelligence technology is expected to come into force in the next 2 years in the European Union may play an important role in reducing the scale of disinformation developing on the Internet.

I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

how can improve the crédibilité of a brand in social media ?

Among the areas in which applications based on generative artificial intelligence are now rapidly finding application are marketing communication processes realized within the framework of Internet marketing, within the framework of social media advertising campaigns. More and more advertising agencies are using generative artificial intelligence technology to create images, graphics, animations and videos that are used in advertising campaigns. Thanks to the use of generative artificial intelligence technology, the creation of such key elements of marketing communication materials has become much simpler and cheaper and their creation time has been significantly reduced. On the other hand, thanks to the applications already available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology that enable the creation of photos, graphics, animations and videos, it is no longer only advertising agencies employing professional cartoonists, graphic designers, screenwriters and filmmakers that can create professional marketing materials and advertising campaigns. Thanks to the aforementioned applications available on the Internet, graphic design platforms, including free smartphone apps offered by technology companies, advertising spots and entire advertising campaigns can be designed, created and executed by Internet users, including online social media users, who have not previously been involved in the creation of graphics, banners, posters, animations and advertising videos. Thus, opportunities are already emerging for Internet users who maintain their social media profiles to professionally create promotional materials and advertising campaigns. On the other hand, generative artificial intelligence technology can be used unethically within the framework of generating disinformation, informational factoids and deepfakes. The significance of this problem, including the growing disinformation on the Internet, has grown rapidly in recent years. The deepfake image processing technique involves combining images of human faces using artificial intelligence techniques.

In order to reduce the scale of disinformation spreading on the Internet media, it is necessary to create a universal system for labeling photos, graphics, animations and videos created using generative artificial intelligence technology. On the other hand, a key factor facilitating the development of such a problem of generating disinformation is that many legal issues related to the technology have not yet been settled. Therefore, it is also necessary to refine legal norms on copyright issues, intellectual property protection that take into account the creation of works that have been created using generative artificial intelligence technology. In addition to this, social media companies should constantly improve tools for detecting and removing graphic and/or video materials created using deepfake technology.

I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I have participated in trainings whose organizers advertised on social media and during which they first presented their achievements in social media, pointed out the large income they generate within the framework of large reach in these online media, then talked about social media, marketing and online advertising used in these media, the possibility of using various applications based on artificial intelligence technology within the framework of marketing activities, creating and running advertising campaigns in social media and then presented their paid offers to gain access to these applications through created additional overlays, intermediary platforms, websites. Such training courses, webinars are usually free of charge. After the training, participants can receive free certificates confirming their participation in the training. This is a free additional form of incentive to participate in the training. On the other hand, among the forms of encouraging the purchase of access to specific AI applications is a promotional offer that lasts until the end of the training time and/or until the end of the day. however, it happens that the people conducting this type of training are not computer scientists who create AI applications, they are influencers, youtubers who have contrived to sell access to selected applications based on artificial intelligence technology, which for a certain fee will be available on created overlays, websites that act as intermediary applications to access specific source applications that are available for free on the Internet. In addition, it happens that those who conduct this kind of training do not even have a registered business and cannot even issue a VAT invoice for the services sold in this way in mediating access to selected AI applications. Surprisingly, the tax authorities in the various countries where such youtubers operate have not yet addressed this issue, given that some unethical individuals operating in this way boast about the high income they earn during such training sessions. It can be a problem of sorts for public tax authorities operating in individual countries if this kind of training and business activity is conducted via the Internet from other countries, which can be a kind of tax haven for this kind of activity. However, the problem can be serious if this kind of activity is conducted from a country referred to as a tax haven and is aimed at citizens of other countries. Apparently, there is still a lack of legal regulations that would effectively limit the use of unethical, unreliable business practices in the use of certain solutions based on artificial intelligence.

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Lot of misinformation on social platforms - how could we minimize this?

C-level executives and high-ranking managers are prime targets for phishing attacks using malicious QR codes, termed "quishing."

In the fourth quarter of 2023, C-suite members were 42 times more likely to receive QR Phishing attacks compared to non-executive employees.

Let’s learn how QR phishing campaign works:

Also read: The Potential Risks of “QR Code Phishing” a.k.a “Quishing”Attackers create malicious QR codes that impersonate legitimate websites like bank login pages or popular online stores.

These malicious QR codes are then strategically placed in various locations, both physical (posters, packaging) and digital (emails, social media ads).

Leveraging social engineering tactics, the attackers employ messages that either exploit urgent needs like password rest or offer exclusive rewards to manipulate users into scanning the code.

When the user tries to access it, it takes them to an attacker-controlled malicious website.

The malicious website prompts users to enter their login credentials, personal details, or financial information.

Sometimes, right after scanning the code, the website would download malware straight onto the user's device.

Read our research article on the above attack mitigation:

360159651_Secured_Secret_Sharing_of_QR_Codes_Based_on_Nonnegative_Matrix_Factorization_and_Regularized_Super_Resolution_Convolutional_Neural_Network

In recent years, there have been an increasing number of examples of situations of deliberate practices in which companies operating social media portals consciously shape the general social awareness of citizens, Internet users through specific information policies applied. The Senate Committees of Inquiry at the U.S. Capitol, which have been taking place for several years, address, among other things, the issue of verifying the use of, for example, algorithms on Facebook platforms that promote certain content, including not only socially positive content, but also socially negative content. The aforementioned algorithms are then changed so that the scale of social negativity is reduced. However, recently there have been an increasing number of similar socially negative cases of algorithms promoting specific political content, e.g. promoting content typical of right-wing political options and limiting the spread of certain social media sites typical of left-wing political content. Thus, these are situations of intentional discrimination against a part of the community of citizens holding certain political views, which the owners of certain companies operating social media portals have deemed to be contrary to the information policy applied in their social media and/or the specific ideology promoted in these media. This type of activity does not correlate with the issue of freedom of speech, unrestricted development of the information society, democracy.

Recently, companies running social media sites have been improving the aforementioned media through the implementation of new Industry 4.0/5.0 technologies, including Big Data Analytics and generative artificial intelligence. The aforementioned technologies can also be used to technically improve the algorithms that control and promote selected content typed and passed on by Internet users, users of the aforementioned online media, which is an important part of shaping information policy in these media.

I have described the issues of the role of information, information security, including business information transferred through social media, and the application of Industry 4.0/5.0 technologies to improve data and information transfer and processing systems in social media in the following articles:

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I think by merging AI's personalized learning capabilities with the interactive, community-oriented features of social media, language learning can become a more dynamic, engaging, and effective process, deeply impacting both the cognitive development and social integration of learners.

In celebration of the release of the 3rd edition of my book 'Effective Science Communication', IOP publishing is making the 2nd edition FREE via open access until the end of May!

All you need to do is follow this link and fill in a super short (7 questions; 1 minute) survey:

https://comms.ioppublishing.org/k/Iop/effective_science_communication_free_ebook

I hope some of you find this useful.

Sam

Social media, linguistic security

Disinformation is currently the most frequently cited problem occurring in social media from which children and young people gain knowledge. Companies engage advertising companies that specialize in running online advertising campaigns, in which advertising spots, videos and banners informing people about promotional offers for products and services sold are posted on social media. The aforementioned online social media are also viewed by children and teenagers. For some of these social media, the primary audiences for profiled information and marketing messages are mainly school-aged youth. Children and adolescents are particularly susceptible to the influence of information transferred through the aforementioned online media. Advertisements are thematically profiled to correlate with issues that are in the field of the main interests of children and adolescents. Unfortunately, many offers of various products and services promoted through online advertising campaigns are not suitable for children and adolescents and/or generate a lot of negative effects. Nowadays, applications based on generative artificial intelligence technology, intelligent chatbots, are increasingly used to generate banners, graphics, photos, videos, animations, advertising spots. With the help of these tools, which are available on the Internet, it is possible to create a photo, graphic or video on the basis of a written command, i.e. a kind of digitally generated works of such high graphic quality that it is very difficult to determine whether they are, for example, authentic photos taken with a camera or smartphone or are supposedly photos generated by an intelligent chatbot. It is especially difficult to resolve this kind of issue for children and young people who view these kinds of artificial intelligence technology-generated "works" used in banners or advertising videos. It is necessary, therefore, that education should develop in children the ability to think critically, to ask questions, to question the veracity of the content of advertisements, not to accept uncritically everything found in online social media. It is essential to add the issue of learning critical thinking to the process of educating children and young people. The goal of such education should be, among other things, to develop in children and young people the ability to identify disinformation, including the increasingly common factoids, deepfakes, etc. in online social media. In connection with the fact that in the creation of disinformation occurring mainly in the aforementioned social media are involved applications based on artificial intelligence, so children and adolescents should, within the framework of education, learn about the applications available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology, through which it is possible to generate texts, graphics, photos, drawings, animations and videos in a partially automated manner according to a given verbal command. This is how the applications available on the Internet based on the new technologies of Industry 4.0/5.0, including generative artificial intelligence and Big Data technologies, should be used to help develop critical thinking and a kind of resistance to misinformation in young people. During school lessons, students should learn about the capabilities of AI-based applications available on the Internet and use them creatively to develop critical thinking skills. In this way, it is possible to reduce disinformation directed through online social media towards children and young people.

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

I described the applications of Big Data technologies in sentiment analysis, business analytics and risk management in my co-authored article:

APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE IN INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATION

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In order to reduce the growing scale of disinformation, including disinformation generated in social media through in the increasing scale of emerging fakenews, deepfakes, disinformation generated through the use of applications available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology, the just mentioned GAI technology can be used. Constantly improved, taught to carry out new types of activities, tasks and commands, intelligent chatbots and other applications based on generative artificial intelligence technology can be applied to identify instances of disinformation spread primarily in online social media. The aforementioned disinformation is particularly dangerous for children and adolescents, it can significantly affect the world view of the general public's awareness of certain issues, it can affect the formation of development trends of certain social processes, it can affect the results of parliamentary and presidential elections, it can also affect the level of sales of certain types of products and services, and so on. In the absence of a developed institutional system of media control institutions, including the new online media; lack of a developed system of control of the level of objectivity of content directed to citizens in advertising campaigns; lack of consideration of the issue of disinformation analysis by competition and consumer protection institutions; lack of or poorly functioning democracy protection institutions; lack of institutions that reliably take care of a high level of journalistic ethics and media independence, the scale of disinformation of citizens by various groups of influence, including public institutions and commercially operating business entities may be high and may generate high social costs. Accordingly, new technologies of Industry 4.0/5.0, including generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies, should be involved in order to reduce the scale of growing disinformation, including the generation of factoids, deepfakes, etc. in social media. The aforementioned GAI technologies can help identify fakenews pseudo-journalistic content, identify photos containing deepfakes, identify factually incorrect content contained in banners, spots and advertising videos published in various media as part of ongoing advertising and promotional campaigns aimed at activating sales of various products and services.

I described the applications of Big Data technologies in sentiment analysis, business analytics and risk management in an article of my co-authorship:

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In a nutshell ,the effect of social media on the mental wellbeing of youth

How the social media influences the well being of students in higher institution

When a user has set notifications or alerts to start an exercise or do the chores, when the notification is delivered, the user may be too engaged in another activity (like social media) which will lead to dismissal of the notification.

Briefly explain how libraries can utilise different applications of social media to market and promote new and existing information resources and services to their users and non-users in academic setting. Provide evidence of sources to support your assertions or claims in your answer.

---

social media influence and social media marketing both are the almost same concepts.

I know, what is new media like instagram, facebook, and etc...

but, is there an academic definition of new media even though I have a some diea of what new media is?

Over the past few months, a number of offers of various consulting services, training courses and webinars have appeared on online social media, which initially offer the first trial lessons, webinars, training courses as part of a promotion for free and subsequent ones for a fee. Initially, ebooks are offered free of charge as part of the promotion, which are usually developed with the help of ChatGPT, are of poor content quality, usually containing only general, well-known, popular science knowledge, which can be found independently on the Internet on various websites. Besides, the ebooks created with the help of ChatGPT or other similar intelligent chatbots do not contain all the sources correctly listed. Besides, the resulting ebooks contain many passages, whole sentences, paragraphs taken from other publications that are not shown in the bibliography, and plagiarism thus occurs. In addition, in the field of expertise, there are factual errors and irrational, random, random, combined content from different sources, and thus inconsistent with the facts, ridiculous content and/or descriptions of "fictitious facts" occur. This is because much of the database that constitutes the sources of data and information for ChatGPT is factually outdated, as it dates from late 2021 or January 2022. It may happen that in the ChatGPT-generated text there may be some sensitive data of specific companies or public institutions, which found themselves there accidentally by being mistakenly entered into ChatGPT by an employee of a specific company or institution. In view of the above, there are still gaps in paragraphs in the legal norms defining the rules for the correct use of tools such as ChatGPT, and still the adaptation of legal norms to the rapidly developing technology is often done with too much delay. Besides, popular online social media even feature partly free and partly paid training courses and webinars, where Internet users learn how to create texts for articles, columns, essays, etc., as well as chapters for books, which can be published as ebooks, in a relatively easy way with the help of applications available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology. Besides, in addition to text, graphics, photos, drawings, etc., which are included in the texts of chapters in ebooks can also be generated semi-automatically in applications based on generative artificial intelligence technology. It also happens that during the aforementioned online trainings and webinars, access is sold to specially created websites that act as intermediary platforms, overlays that contain links to various AI-based web applications, which have been classified in a certain way on a specially created platform and, to make identification more difficult, the links are called by different names relative to the web applications to which they direct. In addition, many of these web-based applications based on generative AI technology are made available on the Internet on the original source sites free of charge. On the other hand, on intermediary platforms created by companies or sole proprietors that contain links referencing these applications, access is paid for and is often sold as part of so-called promotional offers during the conducted, aforementioned online training courses and webinars. Internet users usually learn about such online trainings and webinars from banners and advertising posts posted on popular online social media sites.

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Among the areas in which applications based on generative artificial intelligence are now rapidly finding application are marketing communication processes realized within the framework of Internet marketing, within the framework of social media advertising campaigns. More and more advertising agencies are using generative artificial intelligence technology to create images, graphics, animations and videos that are used in advertising campaigns. Thanks to the use of generative artificial intelligence technology, the creation of such key elements of marketing communication materials has become much simpler and cheaper and their creation time has been significantly reduced. On the other hand, thanks to the applications already available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence technology that enable the creation of photos, graphics, animations and videos, it is no longer only advertising agencies employing professional cartoonists, graphic designers, screenwriters and filmmakers that can create professional marketing materials and advertising campaigns. Thanks to the aforementioned applications available on the Internet, graphic design platforms, including free smartphone apps offered by technology companies, advertising spots and entire advertising campaigns can be designed, created and executed by Internet users, including online social media users, who have not previously been involved in the creation of graphics, banners, posters, animations and advertising videos. Thus, opportunities are already emerging for Internet users who maintain their social media profiles to professionally create promotional materials and advertising campaigns. On the other hand, generative artificial intelligence technology can be used unethically within the framework of generating disinformation, informational factoids and deepfakes. The significance of this problem, including the growing disinformation on the Internet, has grown rapidly in recent years. The deepfake image processing technique involves combining images of human faces using artificial intelligence techniques.

In order to reduce the scale of disinformation spreading on the Internet media, it is necessary to create a universal system for labeling photos, graphics, animations and videos created using generative artificial intelligence technology. On the other hand, a key factor facilitating the development of this kind of problem of generating disinformation is that many legal issues related to the technology have not yet been regulated. Therefore, it is also necessary to refine legal norms on copyright issues, intellectual property protection that take into account the creation of works that have been created using generative artificial intelligence technology. Besides, social media companies should constantly improve tools for detecting and removing graphic and/or video materials created using deepfake technology.

I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

The survey was done through a link placed on social media, so it wasn't random selection (i.e. probability sample). But I need to show that it can be viewed as representative to a certain degree, as stratified and clusters approach have been used.

Children and adolescents represent the youngest generations using online social media. The youth currently attending schools and studying in universities are mainly the so-called Generation Z, who grew up with smartphones equipped with Internet access, including online social media. Today, the children and young people of Generation Z are thus at the greatest risk of being negatively influenced by online social media, including various types of misinformation, fake news, misleading unreliable offers of advertised products and services, influencers and youtubers promoting themselves, etc., which are increasingly appearing in them. In addition, there are many untrustworthy offers of products and services in social media, offers presented by influencers and youtubers, offers presented as part of advertising campaigns conducted in these media, offers promoted through spots, animations and advertising videos, in which generative artificial intelligence technology is increasingly used. It is increasingly common for advertising companies to create AI-generated influencer avatars based on intelligent chatbots for their online advertising campaigns. AI-generated fictional influencer personas look, speak and behave like real people in videos posted on social media. Internet users watching these digital influencers often don't realize that they are watching not real people but digitally generated non-sisterly real characters. In addition, in recent years there has been a growing scale of hate speech most often generated by peers from class, school. The developing hejt was the reason for the increasing scale of child and adolescent suicides in some countries in recent years. In addition, many people, especially young girls, have psychological problems due to a sense of low self-worth and self-esteem which is related to spending a lot of time on online social media and watching influencers promoting certain sublime standards, what is in a certain subculture of youth recognized and promoted as informal canons of beauty, attitudes, possession of certain material goods, etc. In addition, such psychological problems were exacerbated during the Covid-19 pandemic, which was associated with locdowns imposed in some countries on selected sectors of the economy, bans on being in certain types of public places, periodically introduced national quarantines and education conducted remotely in the form of e-learning. In some countries, the scale of such bans and restrictions, which were intended to slow down the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus, was exceptionally large. This was the case, for example, in the country where I operate. Unfortunately, the mortality rate of citizens during the Covid-19 pandemic in Poland, despite the large-scale introduction of the aforementioned anti-pandemic bans and restrictions, was exceptionally high. Besides, the mentioned anti-pandemic bans and restrictions were introduced without adequate public consultation, on the basis of special legal regulations in the form of laws and ordinances, with the bases of prior research and analysis of the potential negative effects of such controversial measures. At present, in 2024, it is known that in the country in which I operate the negative effects of the aforementioned introduced on a record large scale so-called anti-pandemic measures, including bans, lockdown-type restrictions, periods of national quarantine were much more in comparison with the expected but not realized positive effects. In view of the above, taking into account the available technological solutions and applications offered by ICT service providers, as well as the growing scale of psychological problems of children using smartphones and online social media, it is necessary to improve the computerized systems and applications running on smartphones that enable effectively conducted parental control of what a child does on the aforementioned social media. On the other hand, citizens should influence politicians, and politicians should influence the technology companies that run online social media, so that these companies also take much greater care of the safety of children and young people using these media. The aforementioned technology companies should not treat children and young people merely as potential customers for product and service offers presented during advertising campaigns conducted on social media. The technology companies running these media should not create algorithms that promote posts, posts, comments, banners, animations, videos, etc. that contain negative and socially harmful content. That this is how this kind of media works was proven during the Senate committee hearings of former managers who previously worked at Meta, for example, and developed certain solutions within Facebook and Instagram. TokTok has also grown rapidly in recent years, which also features many examples of disinformation, factoids, posts, memes, entries, banners, videos, etc., containing unreliable and factually incorrect content, as well as many advertisements presenting various product and service offers aimed mainly at children and young people.

I have described the key issues of the determinants of the development of social media with attention to the issue of cyber security and the technologies used Industry 4.0 in my article below:

The postpandemic reality and the security of information technologies ICT, Big Data, Industry 4.0, social media portals and the Internet

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technologies in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Thank you,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In today's most popular online social media, there have recently been many untrustworthy advertisements for various products and services, including misleading ads presenting false, unreliable, fraudulent offers of pseudo financial services. Often beginners or experienced influencers and youtubers play the role of presenting certain offers. Sometimes the people presenting certain untrustworthy offers of products or services are seemingly random people who, seemingly as mere citizens of the Internet who want to share their experiences of using various offers, presenting mainly or exclusively positive aspects of using certain presented products and services in reality are paid by the companies whose offers they present. Sometimes influencers and youtubers are given ownership of a specific advertised product for free as a form of gratification. In addition, artificial intelligence technology is increasingly being used to create advertising spots broadcast on social media. Individuals and companies using generative artificial intelligence technology, including applications based on AI technology available for free on the Internet to create advertising spots are taking advantage of legal loopholes, i.e. the lack of legal regulations that would normalize this sphere of the use of AI technology and limit the scale of misinformation, generation of fejknews, untrustworthy advertisements presenting various product and service offers using misleading content to the public that is inconsistent with facts, unverified using reliable, objective expert knowledge, scientific research conducted, etc. In addition, in AI-generated spots, animations and advertising videos, more and more often, instead of human influencers and youtubers, there are replacing them with a kind of avatars, digitally generated people who do not exist in reality. It happens that digitally generated images of real existing public figures of politicians, athletes, showbiz people, actors, singers, etc. are used in unreliably generated spots, animations and advertising videos, into whose mouths are put statements, texts, words that in reality they have never spoken. Recently, more and more often in the online social media, in which there are certain segments, generations of Internet users, citizens, there are many unreliable, taking advantage of the low level of knowledge in the field, offers of pseudo financial services, offers of supposedly super easy and highly profitable investments in cryptocurrencies, in miraculous investment strategies in Bitcoin requiring virtually no knowledge of finance, extra unique investment offers in precious metals, in contracts on selected securities, shares of dynamically growing startups basing their development on artificial intelligence technology, conducting innovative research projects with the aim of creating a miracle cure for cancer or other difficult-to-treat or incurable diseases. Public organizations and institutions representing the interests of consumer citizens, dealing with the issue of consumer protection and competition, investigating the problem of unreliable and misleading citizens presented in social media spots, animations, advertising videos, NGOs and socially active organizations are trying to warn citizens against such unreliable, fraudulent, false content ads. However, the main role in protecting citizens acting as consumers of information should be played by the technology companies running the aforementioned online social media. Leading online technology companies running popular social media sites are developing new technologies and are most equipped with modern ICT, Industry 4.0/5.0 technologies, and are therefore most predisposed to create reliably effective systems for verifying the content used in advertising campaigns run on their social media. This is because there is a lack of legal regulations in the legal normatives that would oblige the companies running social networks earning money from the advertisements posted to verify the content used in the advertisements, to check the issue of compliance of the content of the advertisements with the facts, with the generally applicable expert knowledge, with the results of scientific research conducted, and to make the said technology companies fully responsible for the content of the advertisements posted in their social media and for the financial, social, moral and other damages caused by the advertisements not properly verified. Besides, in addition to the necessary legal regulations, there should be a system of mandatory insurance fund financed by the said technology companies, from which compensation would be paid for all the negative effects caused by the broadcast on social media of fake news, misleading product and service offers, unreliable influencers, youtubers, advertising companies, etc. An additional solution that should be introduced is the possibility of legal enforcement of financial claims on the aforementioned insurance funds from unreliable influencers, youtubers, advertising companies, etc.

I have described the key issues of the determinants of the development of social media with attention to the issue of cyber security and the technologies used Industry 4.0 in my article below:

The postpandemic reality and the security of information technologies ICT, Big Data, Industry 4.0, social media portals and the Internet

I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technologies in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

How can tourism businesses identify and engage with their target audience effectively through digital channels, including social media, search engines, and travel-related websites?

What quantitative techniques and measures can be used to evaluate the relationships between parents and their adult children?

I am completing my thesis on the potential moderating effect of parent social media use frequency on parent-child communication and family functioning. Literature has indicated relationships between all variables however my correlation matrix does not show any significant correlations.

However, upon running my moderation analysis in SPSS with the Process macro I have found no significant interaction effect but there is a significant effect between social media use frequency (moderator) and family functioning (DV).

Can I confirm my study found a relationship between social media use frequency and family functioning despite the correlation matrix not supporting the findings of the moderation?

Despite my hypothesis that my moderator would be significant being unsupported it would still be great for my study if social media use frequency was shown to be related to family functioning. Past studies had not measured one specific aspect of social media as I have here so this could be an opportunity for future research recommendations.

I am researching the relationship between social media and the sexual behaviour of secondary school students. One of my null hypotheses is that "There is no moderating impact of sex in the relationship between social media and sexual behaviour"

What method of analysis can I use? and how do I go about it

please

Nowadays, humans from toddlers to the elderly have a high level of existence to feel validated on the stage of life, especially on social media. if we relate this statement to real life, there are boundaries that must be obeyed, where to give assertiveness that social media has a negative effect on those who do not comply with the rules.

Recently, accelerated technological progress is being made, including the development of generative artificial intelligence technology. The aforementioned technological progress made in the improvement and implementation of ICT information technologies, including the development of applications of tools based on generative artificial intelligence is becoming a symptom of the transition of civilization to the next technological revolution, i.e. the transition from the phase of development of technologies typical of Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. Generative artificial intelligence technologies are finding more and more new applications by combining them with previously developed technologies, i.e. Big Data Analytics, Data Science, Cloud Computing, Personal and Industrial Internet of Things, Business Intelligence, Autonomous Robots, Horizontal and Vertical Data System Integration, Multi-Criteria Simulation Models, Digital Twins, Additive Manufacturing, Blockchain, Smart Technologies, Cyber Security Instruments, Virtual and Augmented Reality and other Advanced Data Mining technologies. In addition to this, the rapid development of generative AI-based tools available on the Internet is due to the fact that more and more companies, enterprises and institutions are creating their chatbots, which have been taught specific skills previously performed only by humans. In the process of deep learning, which uses artificial neural network technologies modeled on human neurons, the created chatbots or other tools based on generative AI are increasingly taking over from humans to perform specific tasks or improve their performance. The main factor in the growing scale of applications of various tools based on generative AI in various spheres of business activities of companies and enterprises is due to the great opportunities to automate complex, multi-criteria, organizationally advanced processes and reduce the operating costs of carrying them out with the use of AI technologies. On the other hand, certain risks may be associated with the application of AI generative technology in business entities, financial and public institutions. Among the potential risks are the replacement of people in various jobs by autonomous robots equipped with generative AI technology, the increase in the scale of cybercrime carried out with the use of AI, the increase in the scale of disinformation and generation of fake news on online social media through the generation of crafted photos, texts, videos, graphics presenting fictional content, non-existent events, based on statements and theses that are not supported by facts and created with the use of tools available on the Internet, applications equipped with generative AI technologies.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

I am conducting research in this area. Particularly relevant issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technologies are described in my article below:

And what is your opinion about it?

What do you think about this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

What role do social media platforms play in learning English as a foreign language?

#Social Media

#Mental health

What are the possible problem statements for this?

I have a public policy theory assignment on intersectionality and public policy. We are expected before the Tuesday night deadlne to address the connection between intersectionality and woke, as exemplified by the case of Britney Grier - essential reading attached - and how this fits in with woke and its opponents such as Trump, alt-right and Musk through social media. I'm struggling with getting 200 words or so togetheron this.So on the off-chance yoy have time I attach the reading and ask for ideas, angles etc.

Thanks

Liam

A system that thinks it has achieved representation as a process of chosen sentience without going through an entire process of complete choice, could that become a problem with AI?

I use Accessibility Usabaility Scale on Level of Accessibility and Usability for each communication channels (television, radio, social media, government websites, and print media) in obtaining information about the provisions and benefits of the Expanded Solo Parent Welfare Act. Hence, I also useto measure the level of the level of awareness of solo parents regarding the provisions and benefits of the Expanded Solo Parent Welfare Ac using unipolar 5point likert scale. But in correlation of the two how to analyze the correlational or relationship of the two levels? level of accessiblity/usability and level of awareness?

I am doing research on ghosting in interpersonal relationships on social media how long does it take to get the full pdf after a request has been sent.

The scale of the development of disinformation on the Internet including, among other things, fakenews has been growing in recent years mainly in social media. Disinformation is mainly developing on social media sites that are popular among young people, children and teenagers. The growing scale of disinformation is particularly socially damaging in view of the key objective of its pursuit by cybercriminals and certain organisations using, for example, the technique of publishing posts and banners using fake profiles of fictitious Internet users containing fakenews. The aim is to try to influence public opinion in society, to shape the general social awareness of citizens, to influence the assessment of the activities of specific policies of the government, national and/or international organisations, public or other institutions, to influence the ratings, credibility, reputation, recognition of specific institutions, companies, enterprises, their product and service offerings, individuals, etc., to influence the results of parliamentary, presidential and other elections, etc. In addition to this, the scale of cybercriminal activity and the improvement of cyber security techniques have also been growing in parallel on the Internet in recent years. Therefore, as part of improving techniques to reduce the scale of disinformation spread deliberately by specific national and/or international organisations, computerised platforms are being built to detect fake news and other forms of disinformation on the internet built using Big Data Analytics, artificial intelligence and other Industry 4.0 technologies. Since cybercriminals and organisations generating disinformation use new Industry 4.0 technologies in the creation of fake profiles on popular social networks, new information technologies, Industry 4.0, including but not limited to Big Data Analytics, artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning, etc., should also be used to reduce the scale of such harmful activities to citizens.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what do you think about it?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

We are currently conducting a qualitative research on the effects of influencer marketing on purchase behavior. However, before that, our panel has suggested to conduct a pre-survey to (1) identify the products endorsed by influencer marketing that students mostly purchase, and (2)the social media platforms that students purchase influencer-endorsed products. The purpose of the pre-survey will help us narrow down our scope based on the results of the pre-survey by focusing on a specific social media platform and product.

Our question is how can we determine the sample size?

Thank you in advance!

There has not been any intentional probe on the role of youth and social media in reforming Nigeria’s democratic process whereas recent involvement of the Nigerian youth in socio-political matters and their engagement on different social media has shown the tendency to impact the democratic process and engineer changes that could herald reforms.

I am currently a senior high school student, and I consider myself a beginner in this field. We are tasked to conduct a qualitative study about the effects of influencer marketing on purchase behavior. I am interested to know about purchase behavior for our research project in marketing. Is there any literature that may help? May I ask what is purchase behavior and how does it differ from consumer behavior?

Thank you in advance!

Hello everyone. I have question about obtaining data from Internet.

In my research I will analyze comments from websites and social media platforms. And I am searching for applications/apps/technologies other tools to download comments from Internet to my computer.

Do you know any tools/apps to download comments for free?

There is around 10.000 comments and if I would copy/paste one by one it would take me a lot of time. I want to obtain data quickly.

Do you have any suggestions for me?

Thank you so much for help.

Regards, Nejc

How much of a social media following do I need to become a desirable debate opponent? Here is my current social

On the one hand, online social media, which has been developing for 2 decades now, is making a significant contribution to the development of remote online communication, social remote communication, open communication of sending content created on the fly, sending information to friends, promoting oneself and/or specific product or service offers, informal data transfer, expressing one's emotions in the information sent, including positive as well as negative emotions, and so on. In this way, online social media on a local, regional or global scale have also contributed to the objectification of information in the context of news reported in official, meanstream media. In this regard, online social media are fulfilling their role of social and objectification of media information both in countries with democratic power systems and in non-democratic, dictatorial power systems as long as they are not blocked and restricted by the power system.

On the other hand, there has long been a lot of fake news and disinformation in online social media, the transmission and forwarding by more Internet users of memes, posts, videos, banners, comments containing unverified, unconfirmed content, data and information. In addition, new ICT and Industry 4.0 information technologies, new versions of graphic and other applications are being used to generate disinformation. Also, cyber criminals and hackers breaking into social media user profiles, stealing sensitive data of social media users are also using new technologies. Recently, machine learning, deep learning and artificial intelligence technologies have also been used by cybercriminals and untrustworthy social media users to generate disinformation. As part of this, cybercriminals, hackers and unethical Internet users generating disinformation take advantage of security gaps in information systems, exploit diagnosed inadequacies in cyber security tools operating in the aforementioned social media sites. Thus, it is necessary to conduct relentless monitoring of information traffic on these portals, to identify cybercriminal, hacking, fake news and disinformation generating activities, and to improve cyber security systems, instruments, tools as efficiently and quickly as possible.

In view of the above, what prevails in recent times? Do new technologies rather help cyber criminals, hackers and foul Internet users generating disinformation, or do they rather help the development of social media portals and the improvement of cyber security systems?

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on a fair approach to the discussion of scientific issues, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Is social media use a predictor of poor academic performance? According to Pew Research (2021), “adults ages 18 to 29 say they ever use any social media sites, which is similar to the share of those ages 30 to 49.” Specifically, college-aged students self-reported using Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok over other platforms. The majority self-reported using these services daily, often several times a day. One particular study used artificial intelligence to analyze student profiles as a predictor for success. They found students who remained engaged showed a higher predictor for continuous success, whereas at-risk students were difficult to course-correct, even with over a month remaining before their final marks. With social media use growing exponentially during and following the COVID-19 pandemic, can we correlate this growth as a predictor for student success in the classroom?

Auxier, B. Anderson, M. (2021). “Social Media Use in 2021”. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/

Subirats L, Palacios Corral A, Pe´rez-Ruiz S, Fort S, Sacha G-M (2023) Temporal analysis of academic performance in higher education before, during and after COVID-19 confinement using artificial intelligence. PLoS ONE 18(2): e0282306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282306

I would like to find out if there is any impact of social media on the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity. I have two groups (Online business entrpreneurs and traditional business entrepreneurs) and 20 statements in total that I have measured using 5 point likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree and Not applicable(suggested by my Supervisor)). Those who run traditional business chose "not applicable" for 8 items and I have ignored those 8 items and proceed with rest of the 12 items for further analysis e.g. Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Walis test and correlation analysis.

Now I have 3 questions:

1. Is it okay to ignore those items having "not applicable"?

2. I have tried exploratory factor analysis for both groups and got 3 factors for each, however, one factor among them has only two items under it. Is two items under a factor acceptable?

3. What other tests or analysis I can do other than the above mentioned tests?

lol ~ when they try, realize they don't intend to enforce their hypocrisy beyond certain individuals #RIOT @WAR (Fun Fun Fun til daddy takes the Zeus-Herd away...)

if blood can't describe the solution to the problem, is science qualified to comment?

Leading Internet technology companies that also have and are developing search engines in their range of Internet information services are working on developing technological solutions to implement ChatGPT-type artificial intelligence into these search engines. Currently, there are discussions and considerations about the social and ethical implications of such a potential combination of these technologies and offering this solution in open access on the Internet. The considerations relate to the possible level of risk of manipulation of the information message in the new media, the potential disinformation resulting from a specific algorithm model, the disinformation affecting the overall social consciousness of globalised societies of citizens, the possibility of a planned shaping of public opinion, etc. This raises another issue for consideration concerning the legitimacy of creating a control institution that will carry out ongoing monitoring of the level of objectivity, independence, ethics, etc. of the algorithms used as part of the technological solutions involving the implementation of artificial intelligence of the ChatGPT type in Internet search engines, including those search engines that top the rankings of Internet users' use of online tools that facilitate increasingly precise and efficient searches for specific information on the Internet. Therefore, if, however, such a system of institutional control on the part of the state is not established, if this kind of control system involving companies developing such technological solutions on the Internet does not function effectively and/or does not keep up with the technological progress that is taking place, there may be serious negative consequences in the form of an increase in the scale of disinformation realised in the new Internet media. How important this may be in the future is evident from what is currently happening in terms of the social media portal TikTok. On the one hand, it has been the fastest growing new social medium in recent months, with more than 1 billion users worldwide. On the other hand, an increasing number of countries are imposing restrictions or bans on the use of TikTok on computers, laptops, smartphones etc. used for professional purposes by employees of public institutions and/or commercial entities. It cannot be ruled out that new types of social media will emerge in the future, in which the above-mentioned technological solutions involving the implementation of ChatGPT-type artificial intelligence into online search engines will find application. Search engines that may be designed to be operated by Internet users on the basis of intuitive feedback and correlation on the basis of automated profiling of the search engine to a specific user or on the basis of multi-option, multi-criteria search controlled by the Internet user for specific, precisely searched information and/or data. New opportunities may arise when the artificial intelligence implemented in a search engine is applied to multi-criteria search for specific content, publications, persons, companies, institutions, etc. on social media sites and/or on web-based multi-publication indexing sites, web-based knowledge bases.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What is your opinion on the subject?

What do you think about this topic?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Please 🙏 your valuable information on date you can see through social media,paper and TV that so thousands of fishes are dead in the water of the Ganges and floating.someone told me that your question absurd and RG community rejected.My dear I ask when I see with my own eyes and every week my readers and fan following highest.please search Google and see that dead fishes floating on water.Also i told these water may be filtered but already chemical action happened and it was requested please share your valuable opinions but please don't miss me and Watching Google where so many posted through social media.

Dr saroj Kumar khan Kolkata

To increase your audience in most search engines, you need to focus on search engine optimization (SEO). Here are some key strategies to help improve your website's visibility:

1. Keyword Research: Identify relevant keywords and phrases that your target audience is likely to use when searching for your content.

2. High-Quality Content: Create valuable, informative, and engaging content that addresses the needs and interests of your audience. High-quality content is more likely to rank well in search results.

3. On-Page SEO: Optimize your website's on-page elements, including title tags, meta descriptions, headers, and image alt text, to incorporate your chosen keywords.

4. Mobile Optimization: Ensure your website is mobile-friendly and responsive, as mobile-friendliness is a ranking factor for search engines.

5. Page Speed: Improve your website's loading speed to enhance user experience and boost search engine rankings.

6. Quality Backlinks: Build high-quality backlinks from reputable websites in your niche. Backlinks from authoritative sources can improve your site's authority and ranking.

7. Social Media Presence: Promote your content on social media platforms to increase visibility and encourage sharing.

8. User Experience: Create a user-friendly website with easy navigation and a clear site structure.

9. Regular Updates: Keep your content fresh by regularly updating and adding new information.

10. Monitoring and Analytics: Use tools like Google Analytics to track your website's performance, monitor keyword rankings, and make data-driven improvements.

11. Local SEO: If your business serves a local audience, optimize for local search by claiming and optimizing your Google My Business listing and ensuring consistent NAP (Name, Address, Phone number) information across the web.

12. Schema Markup: Implement schema markup to provide search engines with structured data about your content, making it easier for them to understand and display your information in rich snippets.

Remember that SEO is an ongoing process, and it may take time to see significant improvements in your search engine rankings. Be patient and consistent in your efforts, and consider seeking the assistance of an SEO expert if needed.

What do you think?

And what can anyone add useful advices to get into this point?

Statistics about number of Facebook and/or social media users per country since 2004

This second section of the literature review seeks to discuss the issue of the privacy paradox that is affecting students when it comes to balancing their concern and behaviour. Are they negotiating the privacy issues according to the theory by Sandra Petronio Communication Privacy Management or the Privacy Paradox model of weighing benefits vs risks? 

I am looking for a collaborator familiar with Solomon's four-group analysis to do experiments and write articles together, focusing on analyzing the social media video reception.

Research Collaboration Request - Effects of Social Media on Academic Performance and Health

Dear researchers,

I'm Deepak, a Research Scholar specializing in Applied Statistics. My focus is on exploring the effects of social media on academic performance and health.

I humbly request your collaboration on this fascinating topic. Together, we can combine our knowledge and resources to make a significant impact.

If you're interested, please kindly reach out to me at [email protected] or call/WhatsApp me at +91 7008978993. I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss collaboration opportunities with you.

Thank you for considering my request. Let's work together to uncover the secrets of social media's impact!

Best regards and gratitude,

Deepak

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the way businesses approach social media marketing. As the world becomes more digitally connected, the vast amount of data generated by social media platforms poses both challenges and opportunities for marketers.

This is where AI steps in, providing invaluable insights, enhancing customer engagement, and optimizing social media strategies like never before.

Do you believe it is important for researchers to ensure effective communication of their research with society? In our country, we often complain about the lack of support from the public, but are we as researchers truly communicating effectively with society?

I also take this opportunity to invite you to explore my proposal for scientific dissemination on Instagram.

I'm not sure about your country, but here in Brazil, 95% of funding comes from public sources. That's why I consider it important for the population to know about the developments that have been taking place.

How you confirm that your account safety in social media or other app.

I conducted an online survey for my research and the initial invitation to participants through email were 290. However, the survey link was also distributed through website and other means of social media (Whatsapp, snowballing, etc).

The total responses was almost double from the initial number of target participants, although the completed responses to be analysed are almost 60% from the target number.

How do I justify the response rate? Or should I analyse the completed responses with meaningful answers and ignore the response rate?

Hi colleagues,

We've been struggling to use only one term in research to refer to that behavior ‘culturally abnormal behavior(s) of such intensity, frequency or duration that the physical safety of the person or others is likely to be placed in serious jeopardy, or behavior which is likely to seriously limit the use of, or result in the person being denied access to, ordinary community facilities (Emerson & Einfeld, 2011). Or yet PB has been defined as ‘socially unacceptable behavior that causes distress, harm or disadvantage to the persons themselves or to other people, and usually requires some intervention’ (Deb et al. 2009). Some researchers (maybe most of the field) use problem behavior. In contrast, others use challenging behavior, and now I'm seeing on social media some practitioners using the term 'interfering behavior.' As I understand, this change comes along with the neurodiversity movement to have a less stigmatizing term for this type of behavior.

In my case, I can use anyone who feels better for the neurodiversity movement and make sense when we operationalize it. But my whole problem is with research. It's tough to do systematic reviews, or any type of review, to fill the introduction for an article without the right keywords. As a field, I think it's necessary to facilitate communication between researchers.

I would love to see your comments on that.

Best

A year ago, I published e philosophical-sociopolitical article (SN Soc Sci 2, 66 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00350-7 which initially received good online attention scores from Altmetric. Thereafter, the scores dropped and are tending to reach 0. Suspecting ideologic censureship, I contacted Altmetric for clarification. Simon Bilevych from support&altmetric.com responded: “If a social media user (e.g Twitter user) deletes a post or deletes their whole profile, we would automatically remove the post(s) from the relevant details pages, which would cause the score for the research output to go down. Unfortunately we are unable to restore these mentions.”

If I understand this correctly, it means that all researchers Altmetric scores will drop to 0 over time, as any researchers post/account will once disappear from the internet (the so far top-rated Twitter even doesn’t exist anymore). So do Altmetric scores have any real value? What is your experience/ opinion?

"Unraveling the Dynamics of Social Media Engagement in Islamic Schools: What are the key factors influencing engagement levels on social media platforms for Islamic schools in Indonesia, and how can ethical considerations be integrated to enhance their digital presence without compromising religious values?"

Good day. I am looking for expert validators to check the suitability of our questionnaire in THE IMPACT OF CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE IN SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING ON RELATIONSHIP QUALITY TOWARDS PURCHASE INTENTIONS. Hope you can help me. Thank you so much!

No, you don't have to become Linked In or some other form

of social media. But you could be better.

Why can't I send messages to people who want my articles?

I wish you would let me. I'll publish my email address and urge them

to write to me ([email protected])

I often want to give them access to a copy of an article I've written, but I can't do it

because I don't have the full text myself and I don't have access to it either. But

I could tell them that if only I could be in contact.

I've found this a BIG frustration in ResearchGate.

You can write me any time with suggestions: you have my email address.

You can call me or text me, too: (240) 423-6651

At first, I just deleted your message to me, but then decided, no, let me give them

one more try.

I have found some literature in reference to virual world and social media. But I am unable to find direct link of spiral of silence with organizational settings.

I am interested in studying Predictors for spiral of silence in IT industry. I need help with articles providing direct link of spiral if slience with organisational settings in IT industry.

When analyzing dialogues being exchanged on Facebook and youtube like social media, it's seen that there are more queries on health-related problems. It is good to research the sociological aspect of why people believe in social media on health-related issues.

I'm a second-year college student at De La Salle Araneta College, and we're seeking for both a local (Philippines) and an international validator for our thesis. The validator must possess a master's or doctorate degree in business administration or marketing management. Thank you in advance if you can assist us or refer us to someone who can.

Title: THE IMPACT OF CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE IN SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING ON RELATIONSHIP QUALITY TOWARDS PURCHASE INTENTIONS