Software - Science topic

There are two main approaches to position legends below the graph (outside) in Mathematica:

This method utilizes the built-in PlotLegends function and the Placed option for legend placement.

Here's how it works:

Code snippet

yourPlot = Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, Pi}] legend = LineLegend[{"Sin[x]"}]; (* Create your legend *) finalPlot = Show[yourPlot, Legend -> Placed[legend, Below]] (* Place legend below *)

Use code with caution.

content_copy

In this example:

For more control over legend placement, consider using the PlotLegends package:

Code snippet

Needs["PlotLegends`"] yourPlot = Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, Pi}] legend = LineLegend[{"Sin[x]"}]; finalPlot = Show[yourPlot, Legend -> LegendPosition[{0, -1.2}]] (* Place at {x, y} coordinates *)

Use code with caution.

content_copy

This approach offers finer control:

Remember to replace yourPlot and legend with your specific plot and legend creation code.

These methods allow you to effectively position legends below your graph in Mathematica. Choose the approach that best suits your needs and desired level of control.

For whom it may be of interest, here is a very helpful answer from Krunalkumar Shah:

There are several software options available for analyzing fluorescent imaging data apart from ImageJ. Here are a few popular ones: 1. **FIJI/ImageJ**: Although you mentioned excluding it, ImageJ's extended version FIJI is worth considering due to its wide user base and extensive plugin library specifically designed for image analysis. 2. **CellProfiler**: This is a free, open-source software designed for high-throughput image analysis. It's particularly useful for tasks like cell counting, object identification, and intensity measurements. 3. **Imaris**: Imaris is a powerful software suite for visualizing, analyzing, and interpreting 3D and 4D microscopy data. It's commonly used for tasks like colocalization analysis, tracking objects over time, and quantifying fluorescence intensity. 4. **Volocity**: Volocity is another software package designed for 3D and 4D image analysis. It offers features for colocalization analysis, object tracking, and measurement of cellular dynamics. 5. **MetaMorph**: MetaMorph is a versatile software platform that supports a wide range of microscopy applications, including fluorescence imaging. It provides tools for image analysis, object tracking, and time-lapse analysis. 6. **CellProfiler Analyst**: This is an extension of CellProfiler designed specifically for machine learning-based analysis of large image datasets. It's useful for tasks like classification, clustering, and data exploration. 7. **Huygens Software**: Huygens is known for its advanced deconvolution algorithms, making it suitable for improving image quality in fluorescence microscopy. It also offers tools for image analysis and visualization. Each software has its strengths and may be better suited to specific types of analysis or workflows. It's often helpful to try out a few options to see which one fits your needs best. Many of these software packages offer free trials or open-source versions, so you can explore them before making a decision.

IYH Dear Ancy G C

That's some old software :D

OK, here is a 1990 manual on Borland Turbo Profiler https://doc.lagout.org/science/0_Computer%20Science/0_Computer%20History/old-hardware/borland/turbo_assembler/Turbo_Profiler_1.0_Users_Guide_1990.pdf

If you have some tech savvy and the right emulated environment you can likely run the Borland Profile software and read your files. The sw can be found here https://archive.org/details/borland-turbo-debugger-profiler-assembler

Maybe you could have a look at the research of Johnson & Johnson on cooperation and cooperative learning. They do not address games or gamification but they show the relevant elements for good cooperation.

They also analysed competition and if I remember well, their main result is, that competition works for learning when winning is relatively unimportant and everybody has a chance to win.

Johnson, David W., und Roger T. Johnson. 1999. „Making Cooperative Learning Work“. Theory Into Practice 38 (2): 67–73. https://doi.org/10/b3ftqt.

Johnson, David W., und Roger T. Johnson. 2009. „An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning“. Educational Researcher 38 (5): 365–79. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057.

For some time now, we have been working on translating these research findings on cooperative learning into corresponding game elements using the gamification framework EMPAMOS (www.empmos.de). We want to find out whether it is possible to better understand the motivational core of such scenarios.

Absolutely, there are several software alternatives to Genemapper for fragment analysis on Mac. Here are a few popular options:

pen_spark

The best option for you will depend on your specific needs and budget. Here's a quick comparison to help you decide:

FeatureGeneiousOSIRISGeneMarkerPriceFree trial, then paid licensesFree and open-sourceFree trial, then paid licensesPlatformMac, Windows, LinuxMac, WindowsMac, Windows, LinuxFeaturesWide range of bioinformatics toolsFragment analysis focusedGenotype analysis suiteEase of useUser-friendlyModerately easy to useUser-friendly

Üç yazılım gereken ihtiyacı karşılar.

Dear Andriy,

First, congratulation with your future instrument. I personally love Agilent 6546, I did not work with Revident though.

Second, in my opinion, the most important step in untargeted metabolomics by HRMS is to fully understand what it can and can't do. Basically, I think a researcher has to accept that untargeted metabolomcis will not provide meaningful results immediately. Also, one has to accept that a whole process is so complex (not difficult, but complex), that it will be sub-optimal for most of the chemicals of interest. Therefore, for example, I would not consider APCI as a must have source. In contrast, for the targeted analysis, APCI can be essential in some cases.

The software provided are kind of repeat each other (in my impression), so I ended up using mostly MPP for all tasks. I think it is quite nice, intuitive and powerful. I do prefer to perform post-processing data analysis using external soft, but build-in functions work well for the initial results.

I do recommend to have PCDL, it can save you a lot of time for the primary metabolites annotation on the fly. But you can use external soft and databases too, if PCDL is beyond your budget or so.

Maintenance of 6546 is acceptable. in my case I have to prepare tuning mix by combining purchased components, but I heard Agilent is going to (already did) provide prepared mixes. Cone cleaning is easy, the needle adjustment can be tricky, but hopefully you will not need it often. I also like Agilent's video instructions., but I strongly recommend you to make sure how good is Agilent support in your location. Problems are unavoidable, I had a great support in this cases, but it is in the US. I know that other locations can be different.

Good luck.

The choice of mapping method and tools for bridging-type research depends on the specific requirements and objectives of the study. Bridging research often involves integrating information from different sources, disciplines, or domains to create a comprehensive understanding.

I never realised how much I appreciate patterns until I read this question. I do agree with what Tarik Houichime wrote; I tend to like symmetry and looked on the Internet about patterns in music:

I love listening to my choice of reading, and this link is really interesting.

Yes neural networks is a model in data mining which always gives the best result when compared with other models, especially in predicting and making decisions.

I just encountered a notification about this article on Mathematical Proofs and the value of Proof Assistants, https://www.ams.org/journals/notices/202401/rnoti-p79.pdf

I resonate most with the positions by Lamport (author of LaTex and a Turing Award Laureate) and Laurence Paulson (author of ML for the Working Programmer and working very much in proof assistants). I think it will be clear that the situation about the presentation of proofs and incorporation of such proofs in mathematical publication is still very much up in the air.

I also did a ResearchGate search on "Proof Assistant" and the fire-hose of articles confirmed my view that this is yet stabilizing, although there are extensive favorite approaches.

Here is the above paper's abstract:

“A proof is one of the most important concepts of mathematics. However, there is a striking difference between how a proof is defined in theory and how it is used in practice. This puts the unique status of mathematics as exact science into peril. Now may be the time to reconcile theory and practice, i.e., precision and intuition, through the advent of computer proof assistants. This used to be a topic for experts in specialized communities. However, mathematical proofs have become increasingly sophisticated, stretching the boundaries of what is humanly comprehensible, so that leading mathematicians have asked for formal verification of their proofs. At the same time, major theorems in mathematics have recently been computer-verified by people from outside of these communities, even by beginning students. This article investigates the different definitions of a proof, the gap between them, and possibilities to build bridges. It is written as a polemic or a collage by different members of the communities in mathematics and computer science at different stages of their careers, challenging well-known preconceptions and exploring new perspectives.”

There is already an objection to this material on the list where I found it. The objection is to this statement: "This puts the unique status of mathematics as exact science into peril.” That statement disturbs me too, but maybe not for the same reason.

use java -Dprism.forceGPU=true -jar. Its works for me

Dear Kaviani,

You can try to use qc, xqc or yqc (to macromolecules) in the scf keyword.

Thanks dear Arghavan,

I have force to use this type of colour.

Have you ever done this type of gel? Did you use to use stain free gel in a special instrument?

Package ‘modifiedmk’ October 13, 2022

I cannot open it. No connection seems to be available.

thank you for

Najib Abusalbi I did yes, I searched in datasets websites like hugging face and kaggle, google datasets, searched on Google search engine and Google Scholars, and across journals and many websites, I didn't manage to find any public repository except the one made by the National council of Italy, other than that, did not find datasets, even searching in published papers and articles, no one mention from where they got their datasets or where it can be available, a few who do that sadly.

Hello Alex,

The best type of software, in my humble opinion, that my company uses is "Royalty-Free" software. This means that once it is purchased the company that one bought it from cannot not insist on more monies to use the images. I use software from Softkey International Inc. for my food research. I added two images of two types of breads and one of a slice of the lemon citrus fruit.

A. Gulsah Atasever

The files should open as normal on any computer. Try another browser, or download on another computer and transfer them over.

1. How about something around "Leadership in a complex world". Newtonian linear solutions of cause and effect are often no longer valid in a world of complex adaptive systems - it requires a quantum approach that includes emotional and spiritual (values-based) intelligence as well as rational intelligence.

2. See https://www.mybabble.chat/ - you said you were looking for entrepreneurial opportunities. This is one and it will make the world a better place too. Contact me at [email protected] if interested in discussing either any further.

You can try to join a free online course for plant image analysis

SPSS, as my results necessitate analysis using SPSS

Hello @Mazedul can You remember how you went about this problem??

First several setups might exist. In some of them (e.g., so called PetrelStudio), the data is not in the Petrel project but rather in a database elsewhere and the project only reference data with or without cache. In the following I will focus on (quite common) case in which the data is in the Petrel project. In this case, the file to data correspondance is not transparent nor bijective. The formats are not explicit and not straightforward. You will have to access via Petrel and export your data. There could be exception in which you might be inposition to reverse engineer format and file allocation, but this would typically be very rare exception and unreliable. If the problem you face is lack of access to petrel, you are in a bad spot. If it simply not knowing how to do it, then it usually takes a bit of trial but export is typically doable, reasonnably trusworthyt for accuracy and completeness and can be automated. It certainly is possible to transfer most of the data to something that can bea read in CMG suite with anot too much (but not zero) reformatting efforts. Am I clear?

Saif Haider Kayani

How can I contact because I have same problem

You're welcome Omkar Damle

A free eval can be obtained - https://www.tetcos.com/contact.html. May be you can complete your project within the eval period!

Maria Anna Dzierżyńska, ma'am you can try AutoGrow4. It uses a genetic algorithm to evolve predicted ligands on demand and is not limited to a virtual library of pre-enumerated compounds. It can also be used to generate entirely novel drug-like molecules and for optimizing preexisting ligands.

Have you fixed the problem?

Emad, it has been few years since you raised this question. I am working on X-rite version of hue test. Did you publish your work? How may I get a PDF?

Antonio Luca Conte There are various software choices available for creating a climate change risk map for an oak ecosystem. Some common choices are:

1. ArcGIS is a geographic information system (GIS) program that may be used to produce comprehensive maps and analyze data. It is capable of analyzing climatic data and creating danger maps for specific ecosystems.

2. QGIS is a free and open-source geographic information system (GIS) program that may be used to build and analyze maps. It shares many of ArcGIS's features and may be used to generate risk maps for specific environments.

3. R is a statistical computing and graphics programming language and software environment. It's commonly used for data analysis and visualization, as well as risk mapping. Many R packages, such as 'raster' and 'dismo,' may be used to construct risk maps.

4. Google Earth Engine is a cloud-based platform for accessing and processing huge volumes of geographical data, including climate data. It may be used to generate risk maps for individual environments.

It should be noted that developing a risk map for a given ecosystem would need an understanding of GIS, data analysis, and modeling. If you lack such information, it may be preferable to seek advice from professionals in the subject, such as ecologists, climatologists, or geologists.

I need more information on the way the device is connected. Is the Analog to Digital conversion being done in the Device (Spec.) and only results communicated to the computer, or is the communication being done over one of the "standard" interfaces like HDMI or any PD (thru PD++)or just Ethernet, but with the conversions being done within the computer. There are 2 basic questions: 1) where are the control function decisions being made 2)how are the communications being managed. The difference is how much the vendor is using commercial off the shelf (COTS) components with industry standard interface definitions, and how much is a custom proprietary implementation?

You would need to know these details of the interface to diagnose the issues you described.

I have used "swimplot" in R for a previous study, link and instructions here:

Contour mapping software

I would say you must build a new quantitative method in "MS Quantitative Analysis" software. It takes some time to build a method, however, if you do it once then you'll find it easy to do it another time.

Thermofisher Scientific has a virtual lab training option on cell culture. You can check here: https://www.thermofisher.com/bd/en/home/global/forms/cell-culture-basics.html

Hello Irene Borghini re: Flame Spectrometer by Ocean Insight ... software... tutorial?

You probably have their manuals and documentation, but OceanView has a YouTube playlist with at least three specific spectrographic items:

Cheers,

Leo

Through adoption of telehealth applications concerning chronic diseases in terms of control, prevention and management.

In IT area, to create one friendly use telehealth application that serve to improve health promotion regarding chronic diseases.

In research area, to assess the effectiveness and practicality of the telehealth applications. And to evaluate healthcare providers competencies related to telehealth approach.

In education, to integrate telehealth content in both education and practice courses.

In administration, to adopt, support and eliminate the potential barriers to these applications.

Sincerely yours.

Thanks colleagues. Could we discuss pros & cons of each code, please!

Arduino Software can be used to take a quick demonstration or test of RFID devices nd also to install some functions or filters to RFID....although to connct it with any mobile or web app u can create some APIs to get and transfer data to RFID reader

Dear Sreeraj Arole ,

Nowdays there is a lot of hype about node.js in the micro-service field due to its productivity and the great community, and indeed node.js is really a powerful platform for cloud computing development, but don’t forget that all its productivity relays on various layers of abstraction which come with a penalty in performance and a huge stack of components to make it work. But I do not want to start here a polemic about which one is best, this article is about using modern C++ to implement a microservice where the idea is using the modern syntax to reach the level of productivity that node.js provides but with the performance benefits of C++, and if you are like me that loves C++ and its great performance thanks to its zero levels of abstractions, then this article is for you.

Regards,

Shafagat

FCS express is definitely the much user friendly than flowjo. I would say Kaluza is far batter than any other analysis software. Once try this.

The formulas used are different.

For AMOS, James Arbuckle assumes that only large samples will be used (n>200) and thus SE_sk=sqrt(6/n) and SE_ku=sqrt(24/n).

The general formula that SPSS uses (good for any sample size) are:

SE_sk =sqrt( 6*n*(n-1) / ((n-2)*(n+1)*(n+3)))

SE_ku=sqrt(4*(N^2-1)*(SE_sk)^2 / ((n-3)*(n+5)))

As I said, for large sample sizes the differences are at the 3rd decimal place...

Wintoki et al. (2012) adapt the procedure for testing the relevance of the instruments in 2SLS settings, that is to say they examined the F-Statistics for the joint significance of the instruments on the instrumented variable after the first stage, which is the reduced form equation where we regress the instrumented variable on all exogenous variables (x) + some some excluded instruments (z).

They carried out two separate procedures, one for the difference equation and for the level equation as they use system GMM estimator. In case you are using differenced GMM then you can follow the procedure for the differenced equation. For each procedure you use the instruments for the corresponding equation, for example, when you do the test for the level equation, use the instruments that were used in the level equation.

For more details you can consult their paper:

Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of financial economics, 105(3), 581-606.

Best software for better research is one's own brain; essentially, IT software is a tool for managing elements of the research process---it can't actually do the research for you.

Dear respected colleagues,

Related to this valuable discussion thread of Prof. Nabaraj Gautam, please let me point to another critical issue related to plagiarism software-detectors.

After about five months, his promotion process to associate professor was rejected because of plagiarism. When he checked the promotion report, he found that one of his papers was accused of plagiarism and with a 100% percentage. The reason is that his manuscript was checked by his co-author using one of these checkers. It took him several months time of following up to solve the problem and removing the manuscript from their database. After that long period, he re-applies the promotion order for the second time.

Therefore, plagiarism software may retain a copy of the manuscript in its database. To state the truth, this is depending upon the settings and type of account subscription.

So, you may face a similar situation when you submit your manuscript after plagiarism checking to a journal. It may be rejected instantly because it would show up 100% similarity index.

To solve the problem, it may take several months time of following up and removing the manuscript from their database.

If there were accusations of plagiarism, it is not well for your reputation, in any meaning.

Dear Prof. Abdullah Al-Mamun Bulbul & all the honorable researchers,

Plagiarism is a common problem facing almost all professors. This respected portal (i.e. RG) defines plagiarism as:

On the other side, self-plagiarism is when the author republishes portions of his/her own previously written research work while authoring a new work.

I may be somewhat old-fashioned, but please have a look at the following golden principles on how to avoid plagiarism in academic writing, especially Self-Plagiarism:

Finally, believe me, or not: If you make one plagiarizing, you may solve one problem and fall into many others where some of which may be described as a knockout. Again and again, please always remember that if there were accusations of plagiarism, it is not well for any researcher's reputation, in any meaning.

Get your results analyzed using this website!

Check out this website:

The service is not free but it's very affordable and definitely worth it.

You might try deleting the current product system and make new flows, processes and product system. Seems like some mistake has been made in previous steps.

What you are looking for is probably a multislice simulation code. There's plenty of them out there, all with their individual strengths and weaknesses, but based on the same principle. Most of them are open source I believe. Packages you could check out for example:

- Dr Probe (https://pgi-jcns.fz-juelich.de/barthel/drprobe/drprobe-doc.html)

- muSTEM (https://github.com/HamishGBrown/MuSTEM)

- abTEM (https://github.com/abTEM/abTEM)

- MULTEM (https://github.com/Ivanlh20/MULTEM)

You'd have to have a look at the documentations to check out all available simulation modes and extra capabilities of these codes. I reckon they can all do what you want. I personally use MULTEM for my simulations, but the choice is yours.

Most of those packages come with some sort of interface to crystallographic files (cif) or some other form of building crystal structures internally, but generally building atomic structures is a bit of a separate problem. I believe abTEM has quite a bit of stuff in that regard though. For Multem I have a little repository to assist with the specimen creation as well (https://github.com/ThFriedrich/atomic_specimen_creation). Cif-files you can easily get from the COD (http://www.crystallography.net/cod/) or the Materials Project Database (https://materialsproject.org/)

This respected portal (i.e. RG) defines plagiarism as: The term “plagiarism” has different meanings, but it usually includes copying somebody else’s work without permission.

I may be somewhat old-fashioned, but please have the following golden rules on how to avoid plagiarism, especially Self-Plagiarism:

Finally, believe me, or not: If you make one plagiarizing, you may solve one problem and fall into many others where some of which may be described as a knockout. Again and again, please always remember that if there were accusations of plagiarism, it is not well for any researcher's reputation, in any meaning.

You need to use APEX. You can create geometry in it and mesh it.

There is a lot of free and editable flowchart templates in .ppt formats online. Also, there are several online flowchart makers like https://miro.com/flowchart-maker/, https://app.diagrams.net/, https://www.draw.io/ etc.

Blessings.

Dear Derek,

There is an option to section the test runs and you can specify how long these segments are. Please refer to 1.21 Segment of Test in the attached handbook. Hope this helps!

Download from http://genebank.rda.go.kr/powercore.do

Use chrome to convert Korean to English which helps you in downloading

Try emailing [email protected] and they will send you the installation file.

Maybe I'm a little late but...

In PSO, min and max values usually will define the algorithm search space. I'm not that familiar with path planning, but , In your case it looks like the search space is the minimum and maximum values the path can assume. That is, if the path goes from point (0,0) to point (5,5), that would be the min and max values.

RediCore、ItraxPlot、iPoint、Xelerate(open-source) are all the data visualization software.

hi,

kindly refer this lik:

I know that I contact you 6 years after your question, but I am in the same situation as you. I would like to perform coastal trend analysis too. do you have the software link? Can you help me please

Metaheuristic algorithm and machine learning - MATLAB Central

https://www.mathworks.com ›

Engineering Optimization: An Introduction with Metaheuristic ... https://www.mathworks.com

metaheuristic-algorithms · GitHub Topics https://github.com › topics › metaheuristic-algorithms

Beatriz Lopo Teixeira Muchas gracias!!

Thank you all of you for the input. After following your tips and doing some R&D, I came out with the idea of using 3ds Max and VESTA for drawing 3D devices of 2D materials. The good thing is both software are free for students and research scholars including postdoc. Initially, one can use VESTA software to draw 2D materials and then import them into 3ds Max for 3D device drawing. Soon, I will make a quick tutorial on YouTube and upload it. Thanks again!!

Mac is best option.

Usually a PhD can be submitted on Word or as a pdf. Everyone can access and search these on just a normal computer. No management system required

Dear Kiprotich Kiptum and , thank you so much for your kind recommendations!

try dash_bio or bioinfokit module in python for creating volcano plot.

But I believe R programming is easier.

Hi Arjun, back to your question, have you eventually found out whether the two are compatible and if not how did you solve it? Thanks.

Dear all, ORIGIN is the most suited for scientific data processing. It is not a free software. My Regards

There are many online servers are available to do this, even if you are using any desktop-based software they too have the same like Schrodinger is having SiteMap do the same job. Anyhow if you can visualise the Surface diagram of the protein, the pocket used to be clear but following computational calculations is a good step.

Celine Lim

Take a look:

Dear Paolo Pelini Kindly visit..

Dear Dr. Bushra Saadoon Mohammed Alnoori

I am also pleasure to cooperate with you.

I would like to get acquainted with modern and up-to-date sciences about agronomy.

I tried Adobe Illustrator and it works really fine.