Science topic

Steel - Science topic

A tough, malleable, iron-based alloy containing up to, but no more than, two percent carbon and often other metals. It is used in medicine and dentistry in implants and instrumentation.
Questions related to Steel
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
6 answers
Where to get the Elsevier Journal word Template please if I can get this template JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH doc ?
Relevant answer
Answer
i need template of Construction and Building Materials elsevier journal??? can you help me?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
Hi all,
I am trying to model a contact problem in DIANA FEA. I went through the DIANA manual and found that DIANA has contact elements which imposes the contact constraint. But there aren't any tutorial or examples available online to do this.
The material property for the contact element has two options target and contactor. When I try to assign the contact element material properties to an existing steel object, the object loses its steel material properties and contains only the contact elements properties which is friction and penetration depth.
Could someone explain how can I assign the contact constraint in DIANA when two steel cubes are touching each other.
Relevant answer
Answer
I am running though same problem . If you got your answer then can you share it with me?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
The process of heat-treating steel samples for homogenization is crucial for achieving desired material properties, such as uniformity and strength. However, determining the optimal duration of heat treatment considers various factors. Firstly, the size of the steel samples plays a significant role, as larger samples typically require more time for heat to penetrate and achieve homogenization throughout the material. Conversely, smaller samples may require shorter durations. Secondly, the method of heating employed can also impact the duration of the heat treatment. Electric furnaces, resistive heating setups, induction heating, and salt bath systems each have distinct heat transfer mechanisms and heating rates, which can affect the time required for homogenization. Understanding how these factors interact and vary across different sample sizes and heating methods is essential for efficiently and effectively conducting heat-treatment processes in steel manufacturing and research contexts.
Relevant answer
Answer
There are numerous standards regarding this domain and you have to highlight your selected heat treatment and the specific property that you want to obtain, in which the main factor is time for the temperature to homogenize in the bulk of the samples, however, cooling rate is also equally important if not more. Seek ASM volumes for help/further guidance.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Hydrogen Storage
1. Upon storing hydrogen in metal cylinders, in the form of compressed gas, how early, in general, we end up with ‘hydrogen embrittlement’ – that leads to the deterioration of metal cylinders?
Whether multi-layered coatings in such cases, would be able to mitigate hydrogen diffusion in steels?
Even, if random molecular diffusion of hydrogen is assumed to be curtailed, would it remain feasible to curtail surface diffusion as well as Knudsen diffusion, which would essentially ensure hydrogen seal/permeation in high-strength steels, which, in general, remains to be more susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement?
2. If liquefaction method of hydrogen storage is followed, then, would it remain feasible to prevent imbibition of hydrogen in metal cylinders?
3. If hydrogen is compressed @ 500 bar, can we prevent (a) free molecular diffusion, (b) embrittlement and (c) imbibition?
4. For lengthy transportation, whether, liquid organic hydrogen carrier (where, molecules can be hydrogenated and dehydrogenated to prevent any disasters during hydrogen transport) would remain to be successful?
If so, how about the temperature variations and enthalpy changes associated with the long-range hydrogen transportation?
Whether the energy losses and efficiencies associated with both the first law (the ratio of the amount of energy delivered to perform a task to the amount of energy that must be applied to achieve the task) and 2nd law (the ratio of minimum amount of available energy required to carry out a task to the actual amount of available energy used) of efficiencies will remain to be curtailed during its long term transportation (say, greater than 250 km)?
Suresh Kumar Govindarajan
Relevant answer
Answer
These are some possible points of discussion as I have gathered with help of AI
Hydrogen Embrittlement in Metal Cylinders
  1. Onset of Hydrogen Embrittlement:There's no single answer to "how early" embrittlement occurs. It depends on several factors:
  • Steel type: High-strength steels are more susceptible than low-strength ones.
  • Hydrogen pressure: Higher pressure increases diffusion and embrittlement risk.
  • Temperature: Warmer temperatures accelerate hydrogen diffusion.
  • Presence of imperfections: Microcracks and inclusions can act as starting points for embrittlement.
Generally, embrittlement becomes a concern after months to years of exposure in compressed gas storage, depending on the factors mentioned above.
Multi-layered coatings: These can be effective in mitigating hydrogen diffusion. They work by creating a barrier path that lengthens the diffusion time. However, no coating is perfect, and complete elimination of diffusion might not be achievable.
Surface and Knudsen Diffusion: Even with limited random diffusion, surface and Knudsen diffusion can still occur. While multi-layered coatings can help with surface diffusion, Knudsen diffusion is more challenging due to its dependence on pore size within the material. Selecting steels with minimal such pores can help to some extent.
Hydrogen Storage Methods
  1. Liquefaction: Liquefying hydrogen at -253°C minimizes permeation into the container walls. However, some minimal diffusion can still occur over time.
  2. Compressed Hydrogen at 500 bar: At 500 bar, preventing all aspects is difficult:
  • Free molecular diffusion: This can be significant at high pressures.
  • Embrittlement: Risk of embrittlement still exists, especially for high-strength steels used in these tanks. Careful material selection and design considerations are crucial.
  • Imbibition: Similar to liquefaction, some minimal hydrogen absorption can still occur.
Organic Liquid Hydrogen Carriers (LOHC)
  1. LOHC for Transportation: LOHC offers a promising approach for long-distance hydrogen transport. Here, hydrogen is reversibly bound to a carrier molecule. This eliminates the challenges of gaseous hydrogen storage and transportation.
Temperature Variations and Enthalpy Changes: LOHC processes involve exothermic hydrogenation and endothermic dehydrogenation reactions. During transport, temperature control is necessary to manage these energy changes. While some insulation can help, maintaining consistent temperature over long distances can be challenging.
Energy Efficiency: The efficiency of LOHC systems depends on the specific carrier molecule and process conditions. There are energy losses associated with both hydrogenation and dehydrogenation. Researchers are continuously working on improving these processes to minimize energy losses and improve overall efficiency.
Long-Distance Transport: LOHC remains a promising option for long-distance transport (greater than 250 km). Both first and second law efficiencies are crucial considerations, and research is ongoing to optimize these aspects.
Overall: While challenges exist, LOHC offers significant advantages for long-distance hydrogen transport.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
8 answers
I'm looking for information about cleavage facets in steel fracture. In particular, why is it important and necessary to study how facets are oriented at a fracture? Why is it important to evaluate the misorientation angle of the cleavage facets? How will this information be useful? What does it affect? etc.?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Nikolay:
It clearly is of not of no importance as the transgranular cleavage needs to form along low energy crystallographic planes. However, aside from that, personally I do not think that it has that much influence on the resulting fracture resistance.
ROR
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Subject: Request for Access to CEB-FIP Database (or similar) for Developing ML Predictive Models on Corroded Prestressed Steel
Dear ResearchGate Community,
I am in the process of developing a machine learning (ML) predictive model to study the degradation and performance of corroded prestressed steel in concrete structures. The objective is to utilize advanced ML algorithms to predict the long-term effects of corrosion on the mechanical properties of prestressed steel.
For this purpose, I am seeking access to the CEB-FIP database or any similar repository containing comprehensive data on corroded prestressed steel. This data is crucial for training and validating the ML models to ensure accurate predictions. I am particularly interested in datasets that include corrosion rates, mechanical property degradation, fatigue life, and other parameters critical to the structural performance of these materials.
If anyone has access to the CEB-FIP database or knows of similar databases that could serve this research purpose, I would greatly appreciate your assistance in gaining access.
Your support would be invaluable in furthering our understanding of material behavior in civil engineering and developing robust tools for predicting structural integrity.
I am open to collaborations and would be keen to discuss potential joint research initiatives that explore the application of machine learning in civil and structural engineering.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to any possible assistance or collaboration from the community.
Best regards,
M. Kovacevic
Relevant answer
Answer
Access to specific databases like the CEB-FIP database might require institutional or professional memberships. However, you can explore academic databases like Scopus, IEEE Xplore, or Web of Science for research papers and articles on corroded prestressed steel. Additionally, reaching out to relevant academic institutions or research organizations specializing in structural engineering or corrosion might provide access to valuable data and resources.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
In my research, I have included a TEM image of grade 91 steel with point EDS. How to reply this question: "You still need to provide analytical TEM/EDX elemental mapping?"
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your valuable suggestions @Kaushik Shandilya, and @Stefan Baunack.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
5 answers
Good morning I have a question.
How can I calculate the distributed pressure drops for a compressed gases in pipe?
For Example, hydrogen compressed at 30 bar with a flow of 195 Nm^3/h. In a UHP steel tube with a internal diameter 34.80 mm and pipe lenght 50 m. 3
Thank you all.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, with these parameters you can calgulate the mass flow
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Hi all,
I recently did a coupon test on my S355 steel and wanted to calculate the yield strength from the stress-strain plot I am getting. The plot I have does not have a distinct yield point (i.e. curve around the yield), so I am looking to calculate the 0.2% offset yield strength (or 0.2% proof strength, as some may call).
From the code, there was a line that says "Proof strength, non-proportional extension (Rp)" [See attached graph from EN 10002-1 for reference]. Does anyone know what the term "non-proportional extension" means? Does it simply mean any test that doesn't have a distinct peak?
Also, what is meant by a proportional test piece and what is a non-proportional test piece?
Many thanks,
Heng
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your input. That makes sense now.
Regards,
Heng
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
1. Fire 2. Earthquake 3. Flood
But the big bill comes from 4. not maintaining them. How can we maintain the structures if we can't?
Because the buildings will start falling down on their own.
Insulation. We cover everything. We cover everything with external insulation and plasterboard. External walls, ceilings, load-bearing structure made of reinforced concrete, all covered with insulation and plasterboard.
From the inside, plasterboard on ceilings and walls
What a nice coolness, but there goes the visual control.
1.And there's an earthquake. How do I see the crack to repair it? In the next earthquake either the crack will get bigger or the ceiling will come down on our heads. In corner columns you can't see any failure from the inside because the inside of the column is covered by the masonry.
2.And rusting an iron breaks the concrete overlay and the concrete and steel cooperation is lost How do I repair something I don't see; neither in the ceiling nor in the column?
3.Catch a fire We will burn like candles. Do you know how nice styrofoam burns?
Relevant answer
Answer
If you use reinforced concrete it will save you from all of these problems.
1. If you use reinforced concrete after a earthquake it shows crack if you can't see any crack that means it is not so bad in condition.
2. we use steel bars as reinforcement in concrete. Concrete is water resistance characteristics so steel bars are safe for a long time.
3. Concrete is fire resisting material. It can't burn so easily
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
I am not a designer I am just trying to understand how the temper of some PH steels is chosen when manufacturing clamp adjusters or fasteners. Also, what is the effect on torque or clamping forces when adding a flat washer vs flat plus a lock washer.
Relevant answer
Answer
Divyanshu Dev: Thanks a lot for the response and sharing the knowledge.
I understand external forces affects the life and performance of the product and thus the need to deep evaluation to determine the best practices, for torque and clamping forces parameters for the application, in doing so, would it be considered best to have the product material internal stress in compression, in tensile or neutral stress.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I need the relationship equations of yield stress and plastic strain for the input of abaqus. as i'm working on thermo mechanical response of steel structure.
Relevant answer
Answer
Use then built in Johnson-Cook constative model for the steel (you will need parameters for the specific steel your modeling i,e, 4340 Rc ? ect.).
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Currently I am working on numerical validation of the paper 'Laboratory and numerical analysis of steel cold formed sigma beams retrofitted by bonded CFRP tapes - extended research' ( ) in ABAQUS software.
The analysis got aborted due to errors like negative eigen value, displacement too big for contact and numerical singularity.
I have modelled the rigid bodies as discrete rigid, and given the interactions by selecting the surfaces in contact and used fixed boundary conditions.
I am attaching my .inp file for further clarification.
Thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
I think only general advice could be given here:
Strip the problem back to the simplest parts and make sure those work. Specifically, remove contacts and plasticity, does your model solve? (Contact can be substituted with displacement BC to test the overall model behaviour.) If not, review boundary conditions, loads, etc. If so, add in the next 'advanced' feature one by one, try solving until it breaks, and then you will know what caused it and you can fix it. Then onto the next one
Notet1: I haven't investigated what you are doing properly, but it feels like a large forming problem, wouldn't geometric non-linearity be important here?
Note2: If it is truly a contact related problem, consider trying general contact, a lot of research goes into that function from DS, there are some features that should be superior to the contact pair implementation.
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
Hi Everyone;
Can any one tell how we calculate the bond stiffness between steel and concrete, not Bond stree but Bond stiffness. and I wan to understand this formulation about Bond Stifness if anyone have information about it.
You Find the equation below.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • Pu​ represents the ultimate load capacity before bond failure.
  • S 0.5 Pu​​ denotes the slip corresponding to half of the ultimate load capacity. This slip indicates the displacement between steel and concrete at half of the ultimate load capacity.
  • Thus, ks​ quantifies the stiffness of the bond between steel and concrete, with higher values indicating stronger bonding and resistance to slip.
  1. Example Calculation:Suppose we have a reinforced concrete beam. Pu​ represents the ultimate load capacity before bond failure, let's say it's 100 kN. S 0.5 Pu​​ denotes the slip corresponding to half of the ultimate load capacity. Let's assume it's 2 mm. Plug these values into the formula: ks =0.5×100 kN2 mmks​=2 mm0.5×100 kN​ Calculate: ks=50 kN2 mmks​=2 mm50 kN​ ks=25 kN/mmks​=25 kN/mm
  2. Explanation:In this example, the bond stiffness ks​ between the steel reinforcement and concrete is 25 kN/mm. It indicates that for every millimeter of slip between the steel and concrete, there's a resistance of 25 kN
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
6 answers
I am conducting a sequential heat transfer-stress analysis for a composite wall consisting of steel plates and a concrete core, similar to concrete-filled tubes or CFTs. My analysis involves heating the wall from one of its faces using a heat transfer analysis, which runs smoothly. However, when I perform the stress analysis by inputting the results from the previous analysis, the program fails to converge after a certain amount of computation time. This is because the steel expands more than the concrete core, leading to interaction problems in the program. This issue does not occur when the temperature is applied simultaneously on all faces. Due to the deformations resulting from being exposed on only one face, the core penetrates the steel plates. How can I prevent this from happening, disregarding the fact that I already have a hard contact between both surfaces?
Relevant answer
Answer
Denis Benasciutti That only applies to steel bars in reinforced concrete; in this type of structure, the shear load at the interface is transmitted through friction, which is somewhat lesser, and through shear studs. Additionally, I need the plates to detach from the concrete when they buckle, so I cannot perform an analysis with rigid node-to-node contact, which forces me to use surface-to-surface or general contact.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
( paid ).
I need someone speaking Arabic tell me how can do a steel frame with slab concrete subjected to blast load by Abaqus prog.
Relevant answer
Answer
An explosion is a sudden increase in volume that leads to a rise in pressure on the surrounding areas near the blast point. To model an explosion, a bilinear approach can be used, which involves using one ascending line and then another constant line. This approach is commonly used in blast modeling and can be implemented in ABAQUS. There are various methods for implementing this approach, including blast modeling using the pressure amplitude and the introduction of explosive properties. The accuracy of the simulation can be improved by considering other details such as the type of element used and various methods. Additionally, post-processing techniques can be used to visualize the deformation and stress fields resulting from the explosion.
For more connect with me on Https://wa.me/+923440907874
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
In RCC-M standard following french/AFNOR designations for alloy steels were used, 16MND5 & 18MND5 & 20MND5. Howevere there is no difference between their Chemical Compositions in relevant RCC-M. Can any one please try to get their differences as per French/AFNOR steel grading system ?
Relevant answer
Answer
The French/AFNOR designations 16MND5, 18MND5, and 20MND5 refer to different grades of low alloy steels used in construction and pressure vessel applications, particularly in the nuclear industry. While these grades may have similar chemical compositions, they typically differ in terms of their mechanical properties, heat treatment requirements, or intended applications. Let's explore potential differences between these grades:
1. **Carbon Content**: While the chemical compositions may appear similar, there could be slight differences in the carbon content among these grades. Even small variations in carbon content can affect the material's strength, toughness, and weldability.
2. **Alloying Elements**: Although the primary alloying elements may be the same in all three grades (such as manganese and nickel), there could be differences in the exact composition or trace elements present. These variations can influence the material's properties and performance under specific conditions.
3. **Mechanical Properties**: The grades 16MND5, 18MND5, and 20MND5 may have different specified mechanical properties, such as yield strength, tensile strength, elongation, and impact resistance. These properties are critical for determining the suitability of the material for specific applications and service conditions.
4. **Heat Treatment Requirements**: Each grade may have specific heat treatment requirements to achieve the desired combination of mechanical properties. Differences in heat treatment processes, such as quenching and tempering, can result in variations in the microstructure and properties of the steel.
5. **Intended Applications**: The choice of grade may also depend on the intended application and service conditions. Certain grades may be better suited for high-temperature environments, corrosive conditions, or applications requiring high strength and toughness.
6. **Standards and Specifications**: It's essential to refer to relevant standards, specifications, or technical documents provided by organizations such as AFNOR or the nuclear industry regulatory bodies for detailed information on the differences between these grades. These documents typically outline the requirements, properties, and permissible variations for each grade.
To obtain a more detailed understanding of the differences between 16MND5, 18MND5, and 20MND5 according to the French/AFNOR steel grading system, it may be necessary to consult authoritative sources, such as technical standards, material data sheets, or industry experts familiar with these materials and their applications in specific contexts, such as nuclear construction and pressure vessel fabrication.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
5 answers
Steel rebar members used in reinforced concrete pillars. They do not come directly in contact with Oxygen and water so why do they corrode.
Relevant answer
Answer
Corrosion of steel rebar in concrete can be caused by the ingress of chloride ions from external sources, such as seawater or de-icing salt. FeCl2 is much stronger than Fe and is also used as a good reinforcement. These ions can reach the steel even in the absence of direct contact with oxygen and water, causing rust. Additionally, carbonation of concrete can lower its pH, making the environment more favorable for steel corrosion.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
My goal is to determine the volume fraction of M23C6 carbide and/or MX carbonitride in the ferritic/martensitic steels. Could I use Raman spectroscopy for this goal? If yes, are there the positive examples of such application of Raman spectroscopy?
Relevant answer
Answer
Could you add a reference about the subject? I am interested in learning more.
Thank you
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I would like to know what all aspects are to be taken care of when we weld two dissimilar metals, for eg. Mild steel and Galvanized Iron
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Shaji,
Please see the following link for welding onto galvanized steel.
Regards,
Simon
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
VUMAT subroutine which describes cyclic constitutive model of steel bars which tell us the ultimate strain bars using FORTRAN language for ABAQUS user defined material.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello.
Yes, VUMAT is precisely what you need. It is a powerful tool for defining cyclic hardening plasticity in Abaqus software. You can utilize it to specify both isotropic and kinematic hardening behaviors. If you require a convenient reference to learn this, you can follow this learning link.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I am currently conducting a modal analysis on a reinforced concrete structure using Abaqus, and I am encountering an issue where all the natural frequencies calculated are negative. The model consists of a concrete slab reinforced with steel bars. Here are some specifics of my model setup:
  • Element Types: Concrete is modeled with C3D8 elements, and the steel reinforcement is represented with B31 beam elements.
  • Interaction: I have used a constraint with an embedded region for the interaction between the concrete and steel reinforcement.
  • Material Properties: The materials are defined with realistic properties: Concrete (Young's Modulus: 51,000 MPa, Poisson's Ratio: 0.19, Density: 2.4E-09 tonne/mm³) and Steel (Young's Modulus: 210,000 MPa, Poisson Ratio: 0.3, Density: 7.85E-09 tonne/mm³).
  • Boundary Conditions: The structure is constrained with fixed (Encastre) boundary conditions on two sides.
Despite ensuring the mesh quality and reviewing the boundary conditions, material properties, and element connectivity, the simulation consistently results in negative frequencies. I have checked for common issues such as inappropriate constraints, incorrect material properties, and numerical instabilities but have yet to find a solution.
Has anyone encountered a similar issue or can offer insights into potential causes and solutions for this problem in Abaqus? Any suggestions or guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Haider Rizvi Can you share your Abaqus model (.inp)?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
My 3d building( 3 storey 6 bay 4 bay) showing very high stiffness and it is a combination of MRF and gravity frames. In place of gravity frames i want to release moment how can i achieve that.
Relevant answer
Answer
You can duplicate the node at the released end and impose equal displacements/rotations between the new node and the previous one, except for the released DOF.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
I want you to help me in one problemin excel file
Relevant answer
Answer
You may find the following useful: https://sourceforge.net/projects/s-s-curve/
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I am modeling a masonry wall in LS DYNA, which has multiple interfaces in between. To simulate the interface between blocks I use the TieBreak contact, which requires normal and tangential strengths and stiffnesses. The normal properties are defined to model the tensile behavior, however, I do not know how to assign a compressive behavior for this contact.
For instance, I modeled two steel plates with TieBreak contact in between, when I applied compressive force on the upper plate it started to penetrate the lower plate, which is not reasonable.
How can I avoid penetration in this contact?
Relevant answer
Answer
Try setting soft=1 in the contact definition
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Where can I get the mechanical properties of low yield point (LYP) reinforcing steel bars? The mechanical specifications for LYP steel plates are available in scientific articles.
Thank you all.
Relevant answer
Answer
Probably can be found in ASTM for low steel
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Hi everyone!
I am working on ABAQUS model which consists of a reinforced concrete wall and has a cantilevered W-shaped steel beam embedded (see attached picture). In order to make it computationally efficient, I am modeling just half of the full-size specimen. The steel beam is subjected to a cyclic shear loading whereas the wall has its base fixed. I have built the model and am trying to match the output with the experimental results. The stiffness of the connection is more or less matching, but the shape of hysteresis loop is quite different. The connection is failing at the same loading stage as that observed in the experiment. In summary, every other thing looks good but just hysteresis loops are different. When I looked more in detail, I found that results from loading and unloading branches are crossing for some cycles. (Plot for one of the cycles is attached herewith.) I don't know what the reason for this might be. CDP is used for concrete and combined hardening is used for steel for defining plasticity.
I am defining cohesive interaction between steel beam and concrete. (Parameters for cohesive interaction that I am using are: Knn=0, Kss=Kst=32 kips/in2, nominal stress along normal direction=0, along shear1 and shear 2= 0.42 ksi, plastic displacement = 0.1 in.).
Can you please suggest me what may be the reason and what parameters I should focus on to fix these issues?
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
While achieving pinching effects in ABAQUS can be tricky, especially with just Concrete Damage Plasticity, It is possible to capture it by combining UMAT, ULE, and connectors Here it is showcased in my project model, where pinching is quite satisfactory. Check out this YouTube video for a demonstration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yMjWY7lWCk
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Electrodes coating changed its color to purple, in the electrodialysis system (Micro ED, PCCell).
My solutions content as followed:
ER: Na2SO4 0.24 M
C: Na2SO4 3 g/L
D: Na2SO4 3 g/L + 200 ppm MgSO4.
My calibration storage solution for CEM/AEM has remained NaCl 3 g/L. During desalination, I have used AEM at both electrodes, and one cell pair. Before starting the experiments I had washed the system with C solution with 200 ml (C+D) circulation, and also washed electrodes with ER solution.
I wonder if high current for a long period of time can cause these changes, didn't notice color changes at the electrodes while working.
Electrodes material:
Anode: Pt/Ir- coated Titanium.
Cathode: V4A steel (chrome-nickel steel with molybdenum addition).
Hope you have ideas.
Rachel
Relevant answer
Answer
E 6010 electrode color bead
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
What are the best software for bolt connection analysis in modular steel construction
Relevant answer
Answer
Robot structural analysis@
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
I'm looking for information about cleavage facets in steel fracture. In particular, why is it important and necessary to study how facets are oriented at a fracture? Why is it important to evaluate the misorientation angle of the cleavage facets? How will this information be useful? What does it affect? etc.?
Relevant answer
Answer
Again @Vladimir Dusevich is stalking me and copying an using chatgpt to rephrase my answer. Stop bullying me.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Can you please explain the type of steel mentioned in the elemental analysis above
Relevant answer
Answer
Macdenis Onyekachi Egbuhuzor Thе composition you providеd corrеsponds to a typе of stainlеss stееl known as "Austеnitic Stainlеss Stееl." This typе of stееl is charactеrizеd by its high lеvеls of chromium and nickеl, which contributе to its corrosion rеsistancе and ability to withstand various еnvironmеntal conditions. Thе spеcific composition you mеntionеd falls within thе rangе of typical valuеs for austеnitic stainlеss stееl.
It's important to notе that thе dеsignation of thе stееl within thе austеnitic stainlеss stееl catеgory may vary basеd on additional еlеmеnts and spеcifications. Thе composition you providеd includеs thе following еlеmеnts:
Carbon (C): 1.03%
Silicon (Si): 3.73%
Manganеsе (Mn): 2.5%
Nickеl (Ni): 5.41%
Phosphorus (P): 0.037%
Austеnitic stainlеss stееls arе widеly usеd in various applications, including construction, automotivе, and food procеssing, duе to thеir еxcеllеnt corrosion rеsistancе, formability, and durability. If you havе morе spеcific rеquirеmеnts or if additional еlеmеnts arе prеsеnt in thе stееl, it may bе nеcеssary to rеfеr to industry standards or consult with a matеrials еnginееr for a morе prеcisе classification.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
I need to bend a 6 m long mild steel pipe with a diameter of 102 mm and a wall thickness of 3,2 mm. Its a very simple bending proces that is supported for a section of about 300 mm as seen with the orangle lines. A motor pulls the cantilevered end with a chain block untill the pipe takes the L shape. Not the most effective way to bend, but want to use some basic analytical equation to calculate the force required in the cantilevered end to bend the pipe.
Relevant answer
Answer
Where:
( P ) is the power required,( L ) is the length of the bend,( \sigma ) is the flow stress of the material,( \varepsilon ) is the strain,( A ) is the cross-sectional area of the pipe,( t ) is the time of deformation.
Please, Let me know if it works.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
Fibers, such as steel fibers or synthetic fibers are used in UHPC matrix to improve its tensile properties. What are the effects of increasing fiber content on compressive creep and tensile creep of UHPC, respectively? Is the mechanism consistent among different fiber types (synthetic fibers or steel fibers)?
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Hello,
I am performing a monotonic pushover simulation on a steel shear wall configuration. The instances (columns, sheet, and beams) are modeled using S4R elements with a relatively fine quad mesh.Surface-to-surface contact and cartesian connectors are used to model the contact. The default value of automatic stabilization is used. The configuration is pinned at the base and the loading is defined using a monotonic displacement controlled protocol (1 mm/sec for 200 seconds). Initial time increment is set as 0.001 with a max of 0.1. When the material is modeled as perfectly plastic, the analysis runs fine and the results, as far as deformed shape and stress fields go, make perfect sense. However when plastic strain/stress values are introduced (true stress and true strain, based from experiments) the analysis reaches a point (about 50%) where the time step size cuts back to a very small value (1.9e-6). No warnings are reported and the analysis has been running for about 12 hours now without aborting.
Am I missing something? I was under the impression that adding a slope to perfectly plastic material in ABAQUS actually helps with convergence issues. I have attached the input file, any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Had a similar problem. Created a model that worked pretty well when applying force to an elastic material. When I added plasticity, the model did not converged. Weird because not even the elastic domain was beeing simulated.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
8 answers
Which coating are used by automotive industry in the combined die casting of steel/aluminum to improve the bonding and prevent the galvanic corrosion ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Pankaj Vyas Thank you.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
With the martensite transformation retained austenite carbon content increase in carbon steels. This mechanism postpone the martensite transformation of retained austenite to lower temperature. This is one of the reason why we cannot reach %100 martensite transformation in structure.
Relevant answer
Answer
In carbon-free steels alloying elements shift the transformation temperature as up (alpha-stabilizators) as down (gamma-stabilizators) because these elements changes austenite area in phase diagram.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
7 answers
I'm doing a research on numerical investigation of behavior of steel concrete composite beams. I'm using the Abaqus software in my analysis. In my model, I'm using shell element to model the Steel beam and solid element to model the concrete slab where the reinforcement has embedded in it. The steel beam and the concrete slab is connected using the shear studs which were modelled using solid elements. My question is, If we use a tie constrain in between the steel beam top flange (modelled with shell) and shear studs (modelled with solid element) what would happen to degree of freedom in rotation of the steel beam? Here I have used a tie constrain to simulate the welded connection between the steel beam top flange to the shear studs. Will ABAQUS automatically constrain the degree of freedom in rotation if I use this interaction? If so will it cause any inaccuracy in the final results?
Also, is there any possibility to use shell to solid coupling to simulate the same interaction?
Relevant answer
Answer
Akila Dulanjalee Wijethunge Can you share your Abaqus models (.inp format)?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
Dear fellow researchers,
I would like to know where I can find the editable/raw data for a set of points of a S-N curve for a high strenght steel, like a dual phase. I can only find the S-N curves, already built, not the data that originated the curves.
I thank you in advance,
Best regards,
Hugo Silva
Relevant answer
Answer
There is a free software you can use to obtain the data points from any of the S-N graphs of interest and as you define the axis and select points on the curve it will automatically generate the data points for you.
Extracting data from graph image
  • Step 1: Upload the image to PlotDigitizer Go to PlotDigitizer’s free online app, and upload the image by clicking or drag-dropping. Uploading the graph image to PlotDigitizer ...
  • Step 2: Select the graph type ...
  • Step 3: Calibrating the axes ...
  • Step 4: Extracting data points from the plot ...
  • Step 5: Exporting the extracted data ...
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
6 answers
I'm trying to model a wood-steel connection in shear in ABAQUS CAE, but I'm having some troubles with convergence and overlapping in the model.
In one model ('With-interaction') I apply an interaction (surface-to-surface) between the steel plate and wood and another one between the steel plate and the base of the connectors' head, but the model do not converge since the begining.
In the other model ('No interaction') I remove such interaction, the model still perform some steps but there is overlapping of the steel plate on the wood.
Does any one had experienced such type of problem? What maybe the causes? Files and print screens are in attachment.
Best regards
Relevant answer
Answer
P. A. Salvattore Could you share .inp files.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
on conducting reciprocating sliding testing, I found that COF decreases with increase in load.
substrate- Stainless steel
counter body- silicon nitride
Is there is any other study which support these results/
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, this is indeed the basis of Friction in Physics. Remember- Static and Kinetic friction !
So, when the body is at rest and as the load increases, friction is equal to the applied load till the body crosses the hinderance by starting acceleration. F= f in the static friction, F-f = m*a in the kinetic friction. These equations clearly shows that f<F when the acceleration happens i.e. as the load increases, COF decreases.
In the wear test also, as the load increases, volume of worn out material increases according to Archard's law. And higher the COF, higher the wear rates in general except ceramics and solid lubricants- (Bharat Bhushan book)
Hope this should help !
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
Considering that steel is an alloy of iron and carbon, how can we expect to produce steel with zero percent carbon dioxide? In fact, due to the presence of carbon, we will definitely produce CO, and CO2. I wonder why the term green steel was developed today with the goal of zero carbon dioxide production.
Relevant answer
Answer
On British television to-day it was stated that the UK effort to-wards nett zero emissions would involve the use of electric arc furnaces and hydrogen reduction processes to produce steel and the raw/ input material included large quantities of scrap steel. It must be remembered that that the steel making process starts with iron ore and with current technology this needs high grade coal and limestone for the reduction process. The gases evolving include a substantial quantity of carbon monoxide. it will be interesting to see whether we can eliminate all carbon input in the iron ore to high grade, including military grade, steel. Stephen A Lloyd.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Hi everyone! I am working on ABAQUS model which consists of a reinforced concrete wall and has a cantilevered W-shaped steel beam embedded (see attached picture). The steel beam is subjected to a cyclic shear loading whereas the wall has its base fixed. I am using explicit analysis.
When I look at the beam's displacement at the loading point, I am seeing fluctuation at the beginning of the loading. The kinetic energy at those cycles is also fluctuating. However, the kinetic energy is very small as compared to internal energy of the model. Please refer to attached graphs.
Can anyone suggest me what is going on and how can I eliminate this to get the consistent displacements?
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • Sushil Kunwar, when a structure is subjected to a sudden load in Explicit analyses, it will go through an initial transient response where the displacements and kinetic energy will fluctuate until the structure settles into a steady state. This is especially common for cyclic loading. Explicit analysis is based on a time integration scheme, and if the time step is too large, the numerical solution can become unstable, leading to fluctuations in the results. To overcome the issues, use mass scaling to improve the numerical stability of the model. Also, use artificial damping to dampen out high-frequency oscillations or use a dynamic relaxation step at the beginning (I don't recommend this procedure) of the analysis to help the structure settle into a steady state.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
I am currently working on a model which has steel beam whose one end is embedded in a concrete wall. The cantilevered end of steel beam is subjected to cyclic shear load. I am struggling to model the interaction between the portion of the steel beam embedded and the concrete. What will be the appropriate way to do it?
I tried by using 'hard' contact in normal direction and using coefficient of friction of 0.45 along tangential direction. The results obtained are different than experimentally observed.
Now, I am thinking of using surface based cohesive interaction, but I don't have necessary parameters which is needed for defining traction-separation and damage. Is there is a rational way to calculate these parameters without doing experiment?
Any suggestions and help will be appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Jamal Bidadi Thank you for the response. Do you know any papers/materials related to inverse method for finding the constants for the cohesive zone model?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
Can anyone tell me please what difference will i have in results between activating or deactivating NLGeom in steps , knowing that i use plasticity values for steel material in property module, the model consists of a beam to column steel joint, i use static loading.
the job is converging only when i desactivate it.. what is the reason ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Instead of using the pines ans normal steel, use the magnetic materials, all structures will be stable
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
I'm simulating the axial compressive behavior of both circular and rectangular CFSST stub columns. Things went fine with the circular section but the opposite applied to the rectangular section as the solution didn't converge and not even reach at least my desired applied load (displacement control)
I used both C3D8R element for both steel tube and core concrete with contact property as follows:
Tangential direction: Penalty method with 0.6 coefficient
Normal direction: Hard contact (allows for separation after in contact)
The effect of corner region of the steel tube is also considered by partitioning the steel tube into multiple parts (See figures below). I tried both static general and static riks but none of them converge with the step time increment of:
initial increment: 0.001, minimum: 1E-20, max: 0.05 (or even smaller such as 0.025)
Please help me out guys. I'm really desperate for this problem.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear
Samy Elhadi Oussadou
,
Thank you for your details explanation and the possible procedure that could solve my problem.
The thing is, I'm also working on the simulation of circular CFSST columns and it converges fine and very quick to solve as well. But when I applied the setting of the circular section to the rectangular section, this problem arises as I stated earlier.
I try changing the initial time step, but I don't want to modify the contact properties as it was what many researchers employed in their research work which I cited. Plus, I don't think the contact properties could be what causing this problem, but I'll try adjusting them to see if it helps in anyway.
I could send you my CAE file too if you want to investigate in details about my boundary or loading conditions as well as other material properties.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Hello Scholars,
I am performing compositional analysis (using ICP-OES) of electroplated Nickel with mild steel (MS) as base substrate. I want to strip Nickel from MS without contaminating the solution with Fe ions. Nitric acid can not be used as it produces iron nitrate. What solution should I use to strip Nickel?
What are the methods to perform compositional analysis of electroplated metal other than ICP-OES and XRF?
Any thought on EDS?
Relevant answer
Answer
TXRF, or total reflection XRF technique, can be used for such a purpose.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I would like to know the minimum and maximum percentage of steel as per international codes.
Relevant answer
Answer
The minimum and maximum percentage of steel in concrete elements depends on the type of element, the design code and the loading conditions. Different codes may have different criteria for determining the optimal amount of reinforcement to ensure adequate strength, ductility and serviceability of the structure. Here are some examples of the minimum and maximum percentage of steel as per some international codes:
  • According to IS 456:2000, an Indian standard for plain and reinforced concrete, the minimum percentage of steel in beams is 1%, the maximum is 2%, the minimum in columns is 1%, the maximum is 6%, the minimum in slabs is 0.7%, the maximum is 1%, and the minimum in foundations is 0.7%, the maximum is 0.8%1.
  • According to ACI 318-19, an American standard for building code requirements for structural concrete, the minimum percentage of steel in beams and one-way slabs is 0.75% for Grade 60 (420 MPa) bars or 0.5% for Grade 40 (280 MPa) bars, the maximum is limited by the spacing requirements and the strain compatibility, the minimum in columns is 1% for spiral reinforcement or 0.8% for tied reinforcement, the maximum is 8% for spiral reinforcement or 6% for tied reinforcement, and the minimum in foundations is not specified, but it should be sufficient to resist cracking and provide adequate anchorage2.
  • According to BS EN 1992-1-1:2004, a British standard for design of concrete structures, the minimum percentage of steel in beams and slabs is determined by the crack control requirements, which depend on the exposure class, the concrete cover, the bar diameter and the stress level, the maximum is limited by the ultimate limit state design and the serviceability limit state design, the minimum in columns is 0.8% for normal conditions or 4% for fire conditions, the maximum is limited by the confinement requirements and the buckling resistance, and the minimum in foundations is not specified, but it should be adequate to resist punching shear and bending.
These are just some examples of international codes that provide guidance on the percentage of steel in concrete elements. There may be other codes that have different specifications and requirements. It is important to consult the relevant code and design standards for each project and follow the best practices of structural engineering.
for more information :
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
In my study, jellyroll is modelled as steel (crushable foam) which is
analogous to those used in 18,650 lithium-ion batteries.
Can someone provide me the material property of steel (crushable foam) volumetric hardening for Abaqus?
Relevant answer
Answer
Modeling materials with crushable foam behavior, especially in finite element analysis software like Abaqus, requires an understanding of the material’s compressive behavior. "Crushable foam" models often use a volumetric hardening approach to represent the densification of the foam as it is compressed. However, it's important to note that "steel (crushable foam)" isn't a standardized material, and its properties would need to be determined experimentally or sourced from relevant literature or studies.
If you are referring to a "jellyroll" from a lithium-ion battery (which typically consists of layered anode, cathode, and separator materials), modeling it as a steel crushable foam might be a simplification or approximation. Using actual material properties derived from experimental testing of the actual jellyroll material would be more accurate.
However, to give you a general idea of how you might define such a material in Abaqus, here’s a simplified guideline:
In Abaqus:
1. Material Definition:
  • Navigate to the “Material” module.
  • Create a new material.
2. Density:
  • Define the density of your foam under “Density”.
3. Elastic Properties:
  • Provide the Young's Modulus and Poisson's Ratio under “Elastic” properties. If you are using an elastoplastic model, this would represent the initial, uncrushed material properties.
4. Plastic or Crushable Foam Properties:
  • Choose "Foam" under the "Plasticity" model in the material definition, which allows you to define the crushable foam behavior.
  • Here, you need to provide a stress vs. volumetric compression data derived from experimental results or literature.Example data (this is hypothetical and should be replaced by actual material data): scssCopy codeStress (MPa) Volumetric Strain (or Compression) 0.1 0.0 2.0 0.2 5.0 0.4
5. Hardening:
  • If you choose a plasticity model that incorporates hardening, you would define the hardening parameters (such as the hardening modulus and yield stress) in the respective section.
6. Additional Material Properties:
  • Depending on your study, you might need to define additional material properties such as damage initiation, damage evolution, or thermal properties.
7. Model Setup:
  • Once the material is defined, ensure that it is assigned to the appropriate section/part in your model.
  • Validate the material behavior with a simple unit test before incorporating it into a complex model.
Notes:
  • Ensure that the properties you define are backed up by experimental data, especially if this is for a study or research.
  • Verify your model by comparing the FEA results with experimental data to check its validity.
  • The actual material behavior of the jellyroll in a lithium-ion battery is likely to be quite complex and might involve electrochemical degradation, thermal effects, and anisotropic mechanical properties. These might be challenging to represent accurately with a simple crushable foam model.
If you have specific properties from experimental tests or literature for the jellyroll or analogous steel crushable foam, those should be used in your Abaqus model to ensure accuracy and reliability. Always remember to validate your models against known results to ensure accuracy.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
I AM PERFORMING A NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF A MIXED CONCRETE BUILDING WITH GUNNED BEAMS AND STEEL COLUMNS AND BEAMS BUT THE PUSH X ANALYSIS STOPS AT 21%.
ERROR STRUCTURE CHANGED BY ADDING/REMOVING ELEMENTS FOR CASE: PUSH X LOAD CONTROL CHANGED FROM DISPLACEMENT TO FORCE TYPE.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Joel,
Check the material and geometric nonlinearity assigned to the structure.
It is required to assign Flexural and shear hinges to the frame elements.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
How to determine k,n, in the JMAK model through cct diagram and TT diagram ,is it necessary to do thermal simulation experiment?
Relevant answer
Answer
To briefly discuss, I'd like to share a research article that has undergone a comprehensive review by the researcher, similar to above question:
Now let me to write a brief response to your question now. The JMAK (Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov) model is a mathematical model that describes the kinetics of phase transformations in materials. It is a non-isothermal model, which means that it takes into account the effect of cooling rate on the transformation kinetics. To determine the JMAK parameters for HSLA steel, you can use the following steps:
  1. Conduct a continuous cooling transformation (CCT) diagram experiment. This experiment involves cooling a sample of HSLA steel from above the austenite to below the martensite start temperature at different cooling rates. The CCT diagram shows the start and finish temperatures of the different phase transformations as a function of cooling rate.
  2. Conduct a time-temperature transformation (TTT) diagram experiment. This experiment involves cooling a sample of HSLA steel from above the austenite to below the martensite start temperature at a constant cooling rate and holding it at different temperatures for different lengths of time. The TTT diagram shows the start and finish temperatures of the different phase transformations as a function of holding time and temperature.
  3. Use the CCT and TTT diagrams to determine the JMAK parameters. The rate constant k can be determined from the CCT diagram by fitting the JMAK equation to the experimental data. The Avrami exponent n can be determined from the TTT diagram by fitting the JMAK equation to the experimental data.
It is important to note that the JMAK parameters are dependent on the chemical composition and microstructure of the HSLA steel. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct CCT and TTT diagram experiments on the specific HSLA steel that you are interested in. It is also important to note that the JMAK parameters can be determined from thermal simulation experiments. Thermal simulation experiments can be used to predict the CCT and TTT diagrams for a given HSLA steel. The JMAK parameters can then be determined from the predicted CCT and TTT diagrams.
Some of YT videos, not related to your question but for better understanding of the materials are given below:
1) Microstructure Characterization and Post-Heat Treatment Design for High-Strength Low-Alloy Steels https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1E-JrvjpL0&ab_channel=ASMInternational
2) Micromechanical modelling of cracked welded joints made of HSLA steel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nDHqBzleQs&ab_channel=EuropeanStructuralIntegritySociety
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone
I'm modeling a steel-reinforced coupling beam in DIANA which is embedded to an adjacent shear wall. I want to model rods in the embedment region, which only transfer axial loads in compression. For further explanation, these rods are fully attached (welded let's say) to some steel plates, where the steel section of the beam is ONLY placed on these steel plates (there is no connection such as weld or bolts). Therefore, these rods only work if they are in compression. Since all these rods, steel plates, and steel beam are surrounded by concrete, therefore I think these rods can only experience axial deformations.
I'm wondering if there is an specific type of an element in DIANA which only resist compression forces and axial deformations, or I should apply these features by defining some interfaces.
I appreciate every one's time and attention in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
To define an axial element in DIANA software that only transfers compression, you can use the following methods:
Method 1: Using a linear spring with zero stiffness in tension
  1. Create a new material with a Young's modulus of zero and a Poisson's ratio of 0.5.
  2. Create a new element type using the linear spring element template and select the new material.
  3. Draw the element in your model and assign it to the new element type.
Method 2: Using a nonlinear spring with a bilinear stiffness curve
  1. Create a new material with a nonlinear stress-strain curve that has a bilinear shape. The first branch of the curve should have a finite stiffness in compression, and the second branch should have a stiffness of zero.
  2. Create a new element type using the nonlinear spring element template and select the new material.
  3. Draw the element in your model and assign it to the new element type.
Method 3: Using the enhanced truss element
  1. Draw the element in your model and assign it to the enhanced truss element type.
  2. Edit the element properties and set the "Tension stiffness" parameter to zero.
All of these methods will create an axial element that can only transfer compression loads.
Based on the image you provided, I recommend using the enhanced truss element type with zero tension stiffness. This will model the behavior of the rods in the embedment region accurately.
To create the enhanced truss element, follow these steps:
  1. In the DIANA menu, go to Elements > Create Element Type.
  2. In the Create Element Type dialog box, select the Enhanced Truss element type and click OK.
  3. In the Enhanced Truss Element Type dialog box, set the following parameters:Material: Select the material that you want to use for the element. Cross-section: Select the cross-section that you want to use for the element. Tension stiffness: Set the tension stiffness to zero.
  4. Click OK to create the new element type.
Once you have created the enhanced truss element type, you can draw it in your model and assign it to the rods in the embedment region.
Please note that it is important to make sure that the nodes of the enhanced truss elements are properly connected to the nodes of the surrounding concrete elements. This can be done using the Connect Nodes command in the DIANA menu.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
does ABAQUS automatically take effect of stirrups and steel section on confienment of concrete or not
Relevant answer
Answer
hi Ahmed samir Elsemeen ed samir Elsemeen
ABAQUS is a software package for finite element analysis that can simulate various types of structures and materials under different loading and boundary conditions. ABAQUS has several built-in models and features that can be used to model the concrete confinement effect in R.C. columns or concrete encased steel columns. Some of these models and features are:
  • The Concrete Damaged Plasticity model: This is a constitutive model that can capture the nonlinear behavior of concrete under multiaxial loading, including the effects of cracking, crushing, plasticity, and damage. The model can also account for the confinement effect of transverse reinforcement or steel tubes on the concrete core by using a hydrostatic pressure dependent yield criterion and a non-associated flow rule. The model parameters can be calibrated using experimental data or empirical formulas. You can use this model by defining the material type as Concrete in ABAQUS/CAE or by using the *CONCRETE keyword in ABAQUS/Standard input file 1.
  • The Reinforced Concrete Beam model: This is a beam element formulation that can model the interaction between concrete and longitudinal reinforcement in R.C. beams or columns. The model can also consider the effect of transverse reinforcement on the shear strength and ductility of the section by using a modified truss analogy. The model parameters can be specified using experimental data or design codes. You can use this model by defining the beam section type as Reinforced Concrete in ABAQUS/CAE or by using the *BEAM SECTION, REINFORCED keyword in ABAQUS/Standard input file 2.
  • The Embedded Element technique: This is a technique that can model the bond-slip behavior between concrete and reinforcement by using embedded elements. Embedded elements are special connector elements that can transmit forces and moments between two regions of a model without changing the mesh topology. The embedded element technique can also be used to model the interaction between concrete and steel tubes in concrete encased steel columns. You can use this technique by defining the embedded region in ABAQUS/CAE or by using the *EMBEDDED ELEMENT keyword in ABAQUS/Standard input file 3.
These are some of the models and features that ABAQUS software provides to automatically consider the concrete confinement effect in R.C. columns or concrete encased steel columns. However, you may need to adjust some of the model parameters or settings according to your specific problem and requirements. For more information on how to use these models and features, you can refer to the online documentation of ABAQUS software.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
In revealing the prior austenitic Grain boundaries using oxidation method how to do oxidation of steels surface procedure pls
Relevant answer
Answer
@Ganesh, don't worry about the thickness as you can reduce the thickness of the sample, smaller cross section will facilitate you during policing and sample preparation as well, best is you can pick the thickness of the sample around 20 mm.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
In order to assess the effect of ocrrosion pits on fatigue of a steel material, I would like to know if it is possible to create a single corrosion pit on a sample
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use a thin drill (with a diameter of less than 1 mm) to drill a non-through hole in a stainless steel plate, about 1 mm deep, fill this recess with salt, and then place the entire sample in hot water. With a high probability, a single corrosion center is formed at the drilling site.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
During the deposition copper on mild steel , the layer of coating not adhesion on the surface, I dont know which the problem
Relevant answer
Answer
If you use a solution of a copper salt such as copper sulphate, yoy will get a layer of copper, which does NOT adhere to the steel and easily peels off. You need to use a solution containing copper in a complex compound, which will not react with steel without application of electric current. The previous reply by Ameer K Ibraheem contains the same fact.
When I was a high school sudent, approx. 70 years ago, I fould a prescription in some handbook and it worked perfectly. Unfortunately I only remember that the electrolyte contained potassium cyanide and was, therefore, extremely poisonous. As Mr. Ibraheem correctly wrote, you can use a conventional solution such as copper sulphate, if you wish to thicken the thin layer obtained in the first explained step.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I want to use laser to cut a round hole in the aluminum-steel lap joint。Not cutting separately but simultaneously。
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Jing He, a simple question. The simple answer is: YES. Laser cutting of steel and aluminum is state-of-the-art since more than 30 years. In a lap joint configuration without any gap it will work well. Efficiency and quality merely depends on the thickness of the joint, the radius of the aspired hole and the applied laser processing parameters.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
Hi, I am an undergraduate student and doing research on dissimilar metal welding. I am trying to join low carbon steel and Aluminum by MIG welding. For this, very thin metal foil is used in the joint. It is a technique called interlayering. Currently, I am sourcing the required materials for this research. What can be the possible outcome of such joining? If I see the joint is good enough, it will undergo testings, such as tensile testing, fatigue testing, etc.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hey there, fellow researcher! I am here to dive into your question with unbridled enthusiasm.
Yes, it's absolutely possible to join dissimilar metals using MIG (Metal Inert Gas) welding. Your approach of interlayering thin metal foils between low carbon steel and aluminum is quite interesting. Let me share some insights and possible outcomes:
1. **Metallurgical Challenges:** Joining dissimilar metals like steel and aluminum can be challenging due to their vastly different melting points and thermal conductivity. However, the use of thin foils and precise control in MIG welding can help mitigate some of these challenges.
2. **Intermetallic Compounds:** When two dissimilar metals are joined, intermetallic compounds may form at the interface. The composition and properties of these compounds can impact the joint's strength and performance. It's essential to carefully study and characterize these compounds.
3. **Possible Outcomes:** The success of your joint will depend on factors like the welding parameters, interlayer material, and the quality of the welding process. If done correctly, you can achieve a strong, reliable joint with acceptable mechanical properties.
4. **Testing:** Once you have your joints, testing is a crucial step. Tensile testing will assess the joint's strength under tension, while fatigue testing will determine its endurance under cyclic loading. These tests will provide valuable data on the joint's performance and durability.
5. **Applications:** If your research yields positive results, the applications could be numerous. Joining dissimilar metals is often required in industries like aerospace, automotive, and construction, where you need lightweight structures with high strength.
Remember, research is all about exploration and discovery. Embrace the challenges, meticulously document your process, and don't shy away from experimentation. Your work could potentially lead to innovative solutions in the field of dissimilar metal welding. Best of luck, and may your research yield exciting outcomes!
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Hello
What is the best coating method of nanoparticles on ST37 steel?
So that:
1. The coating should have high durability and uniformity.
2. The coating should be operable.
please guide me
Thank.
Relevant answer
Answer
Do you recommend any other material besides zincromate?
A material that does not have anti-corrosion properties?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
I find difficulties in interpreting the diagrams obtained by EDS integrated with the SEM within the framework of the observation of the surface of the steel coupons to check their sensitivity to bacterial corrosion, can you please help me to achieve this (attached file)?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Amina,
The SEM/EDS quantification of light elements is problematic. This is because of the large variations in absorption effects in the low energy range, as well as the variations in background calculation due to high absorption edges and high statistical errors. Quantification for light elements is difficult even with using ultrathin window or windowless X-ray detectors because of the severe self-absorption of low energy X-rays, poor detection efficiency, and low fluorescence yield.
Most SEM-EDS systems use beam energy of 20 keV because it is a good compromise between the requirements of obtaining adequate overvoltage and minimizing absorption in the specimen. However, such high beam energy will penetrate deep into the steel substrate and may mask the X-rays of light elements that produce energies below 2 keV. Therefore, if your have been using high accelerating voltage, I suggest you try to use a low voltage (≤10 kV) to reduce the x-rays generated from the steel substrate. EDS measurements of light elements and many 3d transition elements can still be accomplished at accelerating voltage as low as 1.5 kV, see E. D. Boyes, Adv. Mat. 1998, 10, 1277.
On another topic, have you tried using FTIR spectroscopy in analysing the bacterial induced corrosion on the steel samples? FTIR is much simpler technique and is more suitable for studying organic substances. You may find the attached paper useful.
Hope this helps,
Kind regards
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
I want to understand how the steel temperature will affect the carbon dissolution kinetics in steel. In other words, how Superheat will play a role in carbon dissolution rate in continuous casting process of ULC grades?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for the inputs. Can I get the equation for Carbon dissolution rate with Temperature as one of a factor?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
For researchers familiar with the study of decarburization: In a high-speed machining process applied to carburized quenched steel, where machining temperatures are predicted to be near A1 and of short duration, could decarburization take place on this workpiece surface?
Relevant answer
Answer
Likhon Chandra Roy, High-speed Machining duration is short. While decarburisation takes time as in heat treatment. What is your view?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
What additives or lubricants are required for the operation status of the steel ball in the fixed section of the CVJ of the car, or at what friction coefficient can the steel ball not move at a single point?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hai Dr Jesse., how are you? I am attracted to your question as I have some information on it. Below, I supply you with all the answers you need, but I would really appreciate it if you could press the RECOMMENDATION buttons underneath my 3 research papers' titles in my AUTHOR section as a way of you saying thanks and appreciation for my time and knowledge sharing. Thank you in advance and please read my answers below
The reciprocating motion of a steel ball within a cage, particularly in automotive Constant Velocity Joints (CVJs), involves complex interactions between lubrication, surface properties, and operating conditions. Achieving smooth and reliable motion requires careful engineering of the system. Here are some key factors to consider:
  1. Lubrication:Proper lubrication is essential to reduce friction and wear. Lubricants form a protective film between the steel ball and the cage, preventing direct metal-to-metal contact. High-quality lubricants with additives that enhance film formation, reduce friction, and protect against wear are typically used. Common lubricants include grease and oil-based formulations.
  2. Additives:Depending on the application, lubricants may contain additives such as anti-wear agents, friction modifiers, extreme pressure (EP) additives, and anti-corrosion compounds. These additives help enhance lubricant performance and extend the life of the components.
  3. Surface Treatment:Both the steel ball and the cage surfaces can be treated to improve wear resistance and reduce friction. Techniques such as surface hardening, nitriding, or coatings like DLC (diamond-like carbon) can enhance the durability of the components.
  4. Clearance and Tolerance:Proper clearance and tolerance between the steel ball and the cage are crucial. Adequate clearance ensures that the ball can move freely while minimizing the risk of jamming or excessive play.
  5. Geometry and Design:The design of the cage, raceways, and ball geometry can influence the motion. The geometry should be optimized to provide smooth rolling motion and minimize potential areas of contact or interference.
  6. Friction Coefficient:The friction coefficient between the steel ball and the cage influences the ability of the ball to move within the cage. If the friction coefficient is too high, it may result in increased resistance to motion or even sticking. The lubricant and additives aim to reduce this friction coefficient.
  7. Operating Conditions:The operating conditions, including speed, load, temperature, and vibration, affect the lubrication and overall performance of the system. Lubricants and materials should be selected to withstand these conditions.
  8. Maintenance:Regular maintenance and lubricant replacement are essential to ensure long-term performance. Lubricant degradation over time can lead to increased friction and wear.
It's important to note that the specific lubrication requirements and design considerations can vary based on the application, vehicle type, and manufacturer. Engineers and researchers in the automotive industry continuously study and optimize these factors to ensure the reliable operation of components like CVJs.
For detailed information about the lubrication requirements and additives used in automotive CVJs, it's recommended to refer to technical literature, research papers, and industry standards from reputable sources within the automotive engineering field.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I want to build an CCT diagram for low-alloy steel, where I need to take into account the holding time.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello,
I am not sure about ThermoCalc but most of the software that are used for the same purpose needs austenitization temperature and grain size for calculating the CCT diagram. The holding time will change the grain size at a specific austenitization temperature. Therefore, instead of holding time parameter, you may use the grain size while calculating the CCT diagrams.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
is it possible that use from a verified wps for steel tank and Al tank?
when thickness is equal and MIG process is used.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, it is possible to use a verified welding procedure specification (WPS) for welding both steel tanks and aluminum tanks. However, it is important to note that welding steel and aluminum requires different techniques and procedures due to the differences in their physical properties.
When welding steel, the WPS should be tailored to the specific grade of steel being welded, the thickness of the material, and the welding position. The WPS should also take into account the welding process being used, such as shielded metal arc welding (SMAW), gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), or gas metal arc welding (GMAW).
When welding aluminum, the WPS should also be tailored to the specific grade of aluminum being welded, the thickness of the material, and the welding position. The WPS should also take into account the welding process being used, such as GTAW or GMAW, as well as the use of specialized equipment such as a high-frequency start unit.
In both cases, it is important to follow the WPS carefully to ensure the quality and integrity of the welds and to maintain safety during the welding process. It is also important to ensure that the welder performing the work is qualified to use the specific WPS and has the necessary experience and skills to produce high-quality welds.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
I am preparing an anti-corrosion silica coating on the surface of carbon steel. I use the dip coating sol-gel method with TEOS as precursor. But the resulting silica coat is easily separated from the carbon steel and does not have any adhesion. How do I add adhesion to the silica layer? In some articles it says to use another silane like MPTS as a binder in addition to the first silane which is TEOS when synthesizing the layer, does that help?
Currently, in addition to the TEOS, only poly hydrogen methyl silane (PHMS) is also available in the laboratory. can I use it?
Best regards
Relevant answer
Answer
Ah, the quest for a robust silica adhesive layer on carbon steel! I am here to aid you in your endeavor.
Indeed, achieving strong adhesion between the silica coating and carbon steel is crucial for effective anti-corrosion properties. Let me offer some insights:
1. Incorporate a Silane Binder: Adding a silane binder, like MPTS (3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane), along with TEOS during the sol-gel synthesis can significantly enhance adhesion. The silane binder acts as a coupling agent, promoting strong bonding between the silica layer and the carbon steel surface.
2. Proper Surface Preparation: Ensure the carbon steel surface is thoroughly cleaned and prepared before the dip coating process. Any contaminants or oxide layers can hinder adhesion. Consider surface treatments such as sandblasting, acid etching, or chemical cleaning to improve adhesion.
3. Optimized Dip Coating Parameters: Carefully control the dip coating parameters, including withdrawal speed and drying conditions. Optimizing these parameters can result in a more uniform and adherent silica coating.
4. Multi-Layer Coating: Applying multiple layers of the silica coating may improve adhesion. Each layer can enhance the binding of the subsequent layer, leading to better adhesion overall.
Now, let's address the availability of PHMS in your laboratory. While MPTS is the preferred silane binder, PHMS can also serve as a potential alternative. It might not offer the same level of adhesion improvement as MPTS, but it could still enhance the binding to some extent.
Remember, experimentation and optimization are key in material synthesis. You can try using a combination of TEOS and PHMS to assess the adhesion performance. Keep in mind that results may vary based on the specific conditions and experimental setup.
With these insights, I hope you achieve a robust silica adhesive layer that triumphantly defends carbon steel against corrosion. Now, go forth and conquer, and let your anti-corrosion masterpiece shine!
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
The fibrous lung tissue is being prepared to perform an HP assay and requires full homogenisation. The method we are using is to finely chop the lung tissue and use a FastPrep for 10 cycles using glass/steel beads. Unfortunately, this method is still producing visible pieces of non-homogenised tissue.
Can anyone recommend a better method for full homogenisation of fibrous lung tissue please?
Relevant answer
Answer
you could combine the mechanical method with some protease enzymes: https://lab.plygenind.com/how-to-homogenize-animal-tissue-for-dna-extraction-a-practical-guide
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
We have a WPS to manufacture a steel tank; Can we use that to manufacture a AL tank?
if, the answer is yes/no; pls explain for me.
Thickness of steel = Thickness of AL
MIG process is used for both material.
Relevant answer
Answer
how can we do?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
why the maximum peak in the spectrum is at 2 theta 60?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Ahmed,
Your sample contains more Wustite than other phases; as the highest peaks in your XRD are at 2 theta: 61 and 42. A slag of steel is expected to contain Wustite (iron oxide).
You can interpret XRD data by consulting the XRD tables, an example is given in the following link:
You will see that the 2 theta for the oxides you have mentioned, arranged by intensity (highest to lowest) are as follows:
Wustite: 42, 61 and 36.
Gehlenite: 52, 31 and 37.
Portlandite: 34, 18 and 47.
Hope this helps,
Kind regards,
Ameer
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Can anyone please tell me in detailed explanation what is the difference between the joint and the connection in steel joint?
given that :
joint rotation = total rotation of the beam-end - beam elastic deformation - column elastic deforamtion - block rotation
connection rotation = joint roation - column web in plane rotation + column elastic deformation + block rotation
Those equations are taken from the litterature
Relevant answer
Answer
In the context of steel structures, a joint refers to the point where two or more structural members are connected together, while a connection refers to the actual mechanism or means by which those members are joined.
The joint rotation is a term used to describe the rotational movement or displacement that occurs at the joint between two connected members, such as a beam and a column. It represents the relative rotation between the connected members caused by external loads or deformations. The joint rotation is influenced by various factors, including the stiffness of the members, the type of connection, and the applied loads.
The total rotation of the beam-end refers to the rotation experienced by the beam at its end due to external loads. This rotation is directly related to the applied moments and forces on the beam and can be calculated using structural analysis methods.
The beam elastic deformation refers to the rotational displacement of the beam caused by its own flexibility or elasticity. When a beam is subjected to external loads, it undergoes elastic deformations based on its material properties and cross-sectional characteristics.
The column elastic deformation refers to the rotational displacement of the column caused by its own flexibility or elasticity. Similar to the beam, a column can also experience elastic deformations when subjected to external loads.
The block rotation refers to the rotational displacement of the block or base on which the column rests. It occurs when the column base is not completely fixed and allows for some rotation. The block rotation can be influenced by factors such as the base connection type, soil conditions, and column loading.
The connection rotation is the overall rotational displacement or movement of the joint as a result of the connection and its interaction with the connected members. It is calculated by subtracting the column web in-plane rotation, adding the column elastic deformation, and adding the block rotation from the joint rotation.
The column web in-plane rotation refers to the rotational displacement of the column web (the vertical plate connecting the column flanges) caused by the applied loads and the interaction with the connection. This rotation can occur when the connection transmits forces and moments that induce twisting or rotation of the column web.
To summarize, the difference between joint rotation and connection rotation is that the joint rotation represents the relative rotation between the connected members caused by external loads, while the connection rotation takes into account additional factors such as column web in-plane rotation, column elastic deformation, and block rotation. The connection rotation provides a more comprehensive understanding of the overall rotational behavior of the joint and its connection.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Literatures suggest that unlike non-ferromagnetic materials that lead to a decrease in impedance of the eddy current sensor, ferromagnetic materials lead to an increase in impedance of the coil. It is stated that this behavior is reversed at sensor frequencies > 1 MHz. Is it true?
Relevant answer
Answer
Joshua Depiver, Thanks for your answer
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I am trying to modify a robotic-arm GMAW to perform wire & arc additive manufacturing. I plan to print a few layers of austenitic grade steel to understand the anisotropy in mechanical properties. What will be the best possible WAAM dedicated platforms (preferably open-source) for parameter optimization and Residual Stress Modelling?
Relevant answer
Answer
you can check the references in the last paragraph of WAAM section in this review:
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Is any co-relation between highly strained, strainless samples to see or observed melt pool cross-section after laser powder bed fusion process.
Relevant answer
Answer
you can find the references on PH-17 steel on this review:
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
Is it possible to use EDDY CURRENT TESTING Nondestructive testing method to check Inter-metalic phase of Duplex Steel pipes?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Depivers
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
We found thin black areas of polygon shape in some fatigue fracture surfaces of LPBF 18Ni300 maraging steel over-aged at 585C (6 hours). The EDS analysis indicated the higher carbon fraction, but this is the carbon...
The photo and EDS results are enclosed.
Any comments will be appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
With carbon content 0.03% maximum it is not realistic to expect to see any sizable carbides. SEM image of a region is to poor to be of any use, but since you said you see black area, I would suspect that it is some organic contamination (more carbon, darker than surroundings).
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I have a steel tube, I want to make this steel as an isolator from electricity.
Relevant answer
Answer
One material type that can be used to cover a steel tube and provide insulation against electricity is an insulating polymer or plastic. Examples of such materials include polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene, and epoxy resins. These materials have high electrical resistivity and can effectively prevent the flow of electric current through the steel tube, thereby providing insulation. The specific choice of material will depend on factors such as the required voltage rating, temperature resistance, and mechanical properties needed for the application.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Hey researchers,
I am working on Elliptical CFST short columns, and currently, I am using the Abaqus software to prepare my model. I need to use High strength steel in this model. While modeling, I need to put a property module in this model. But I don't understand how can I do that. Because it should be numerical modeling, not experimental. So please tell me how to input the material properties of HSS in that model.
Thanking you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your answer it was very helpful. But can you explain point no. 2 more deeply, because I cannot find the options here in my Abaqus 6.14. Krishna Subedi
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
I'm struggling to obtain the right behavior of gfrp bars, in the process of validating my model i achieve a bilinear behavior in the displacement x force graph when using gfrp bars as reinforcement, but in the research that i'm using the experimental behavior was linear. Even though i've tried to change a lot of parameters in my model I still couldn't obtain something close.
The model has steel stirrups and upper layer reinforcement and only the lower reinforcement uses GFRP bars.
The bars were modeled as wire T3D2 and the beam as solid c3d8r
For the properties data:
For concrete i'm using de young's modulus, poisson and CDP
For GFRP bars young's modulus, poisson and tensile strenght also rupture strenght
Anyone knows what can i do to correct the behavior that i'm having?
In the image i show the behavior that i need in black and what i am obtaining in the other colors
Relevant answer
Answer
What material model did you use?
Change the bars to solid and use the LaRC05 material model for FRPs.
Good luck
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Which oil is used for quenching of modified 9Cr-1mo steel (P91/Grade91 steel)? Can anyone suggest the name of the quenching oil?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Mr. Depiver for the information. It will help me to finalize the oil.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Hi,
I am modeling a reinforced concrete(RC) slab in DIANA FEA.
The RC slab is simply mounted on a steel girder (see config 1) Therefore, there is no bonding between the RC slab and the steel girder. In order to satisfy these interface conditions, it is set as shown in Figure 2. When a vertical downward pressing force (bending stress) from the center of the slab is applied, it is expected that the slab located on the girder will be lifted up (as in the principle of lever). See Fig 3). As expected, the upward displacement of the slab on the girder occurred, but in some sections it appeared as if it had been bonded and no lifting occurred (See Figure 4) Please advise why this is happening and what interface setting should be done.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Dear Lee,
Could still be lifting up and just a scale issue in the picture. The collor yellow in the picture can be tension or 0. You can output the stress of the interface. stress total tracti to be sure. Or change the legenda with a 0 value in it.
Ab van den Bos
NLyseConsultants.com for all your FEA projects within the built environment.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Imagining you have 1 m3 cubed container made out of steel and inside the container is 5 bar. What will the force be felt on the container if the pressure inside suddenly drops to 1 bar? Temperature can be omitted if needed.
Trying to design a yield limit for pressure-drop resistant materials through tensile/compressive measurements.
Relevant answer
Answer
The force acting on the walls of the container due to the pressure inside can be calculated using the formula:
F = P * A
where:
  • F is the force,
  • P is the pressure, and
  • A is the area.
Given a cubical container with an edge length of 1 m, one side's surface area (A) is 1 m^2. Since a cube has six faces, the total surface area is 6 m^2.
When the pressure inside the container drops from 5 bar to 1 bar, the pressure change (ΔP) is -4 bar. Converting this to pascals (since 1 bar equals 100,000 Pa), the pressure change is -400,000 Pa or -400,000 N/m^2.
So, the total force change experienced by the walls of the container is:
ΔF = ΔP * A ΔF = -400,000 N/m^2 * 6 m^2 ΔF = -2,400,000 N
The negative sign indicates that the force has decreased due to the pressure drop.
The stress on the walls of the container is the force divided by the area over which the force is distributed. In this case, the change in stress on the walls is equal to the change in pressure because the area cancels out:
Δσ = ΔF / A Δσ = -400,000 N/m^2
This means the stress on the walls of the container decreases by 400,000 N/m^2 due to the pressure drop. This stress is what your material must be able to withstand. The yield limit of your material, obtained through tensile or compressive tests, should be higher than this value to prevent deformation.
Please note that this calculation assumes that the stress is evenly distributed over the walls of the container, and ignores other potential factors such as strain hardening, material defects, or localized stresses due to design features (like welds, or changes in thickness). A more detailed analysis using mechanical engineering and material science principles would be needed for a thorough safety assessment.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
have any of you come across articles on the protection of carbon steels by bacterial biofilms? can anyone help me please?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank's for your answer M.Phil Geis
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
An error is showing during the verify all members passed in SAP2000 for a G+3 RC Hill building. The bottom columns of dimension 400x400 mm2 while remaining columns dimension is 300x300 mm2. The percentage of steel is also reached in its max value i.e. 6% as per IS 456:2000. But it shows the capacity failure in the longest columns at ground floors while others have been passed.
In this I am unable to think about how to these three columns will be passed without violating IS 456: 2000 and other irregularity in the models.
May you suggest me as how can I remove further this failure?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank You
Samy Elhadi Oussadou
for your suggestion.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
Kindly tell the electrolytic polishing reagent as well as chemical and electrolytic etchant for 304H austenitic steel.
Relevant answer
Answer
304H Stainless Steel, I am generally use 10% aqueous solution of oxalic acid at a voltage of about 6 volts and a duration of 40-60 seconds. if not etching properly increase voltage up to 12 v and time to 120 seconds
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
3 answers
I am currently working on my thesis in Retrofitting of soft story. At first step i am trying to validate a experimental test. There i need to model a bracing with gap in it. The bracing should act only in compression after the gap is closed and free in tension. For creating simplified model i tried to create compression only element with uniaxial non linear elasticity model available for steel in Diana where i gave input to stress-strain diagram with very small value in tension and in compression, i gave nearly 0 value upto strain when gap closes and after that normal stress strain value of steel. I got the hysterisis result where there is increases in lateral resistance as compared to test result. how an i fix this? Is there any approach to model gap element? i tried contact analysis too but could not make it out.I have attached hysteresis result of Experiment and Diana Modeling. The bracing should start working after 1% drift.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Add an interface element with your manual stiffness properties almost 0 till a certain displacement and then increase the stiffness when the gap is closed.
drop me an email if you need more info.
a.vandenbos_NLyseConsultants.com
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
What is the most convenient method to machine a notch in a compact tension specimen according to ASTM E647 standard?
I do not have the option to use wire cut EDM and I'm just getting into conducting FCGR.
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Shiv Sahaya Shukla , thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately I do not have a wire EDM facility. Do you have any other, suggestions?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Thermo mechanical treatment of steel consists of cooling the steel re-bars with a water pressure of 20 bar and ambient temperature. A martensite ring is formed. I'm confused about how water at ambient temperature attains the critical cooling rate to form martensite.
Relevant answer
Answer
Samy Elhadi Oussadou
Thank you very much for your explanation.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Hello everyone,
I'm currently studying steel bars embedded in concrete and conducting electrochemical measurements to analyze their corrosion behavior. I have used Linear Polarization Resistance (LRP) and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) techniques to measure the polarization resistance. However, I have noticed that the results obtained from these two methods are different, especially when the current corrosion density is low or when the system is in a passive state.
Has anyone encountered similar discrepancies in their research? I would greatly appreciate any insights or suggestions regarding the potential reasons behind this discrepancy. Additionally, if you have any recommendations on alternative techniques or approaches to accurately measure polarization resistance in such conditions, I would love to hear your experiences.
Thank you in advance for your help
Relevant answer
Answer
if the differences are less than an order of magnitude, they're probably not significant. eg 0.7, 0.5 and 1 are all basically the same, and 5 7 and 10 would be a significant difference. its tempting to quote the figures to multiple decimal places, but its probably not that meaningful. EIS is a good way of generating data, but most of the graphs I've seen on concrete are dominated by diffusion anyway. When steel is passive by definition its very easy to polarise, so small applied currents give big shifts in potential, which can aggravate the magnitude of noise.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
6 answers
How accurate are XRD measurements with Rietveld analysis when compared to other measurement methods in determining the weight fraction of carbon in steel?
Hopefully those experienced with this case would be willing to help.
Relevant answer
Answer
you can read https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/4/566, hope you can find what you need
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Dear researchers,
I am currently researching the issue of fracture in thin steel plates containing holes. Some scholars have already conducted static tensile fracture tests on plates with holes [1], and the test model is shown in the attachment. I have derived the stress distribution field under static tensile conditions. However, in my practical applications, the specimen is subjected to high loading rates, where the tensile force approximates an impulse force. Therefore, the static results can only serve as a reference. I would like to further investigate the fracture mechanisms in the transient tensile behavior of the steel plate, including the influence of the distribution of cracks near the hole and hole geometry on the results. It would be ideal to obtain theoretical solutions. Could you provide me with some suggestions or references regarding the research direction? Thank you for your attention.
[1] Wang W and Jiang L 2011 Fracture Mode of High Strength Steel Thin Plates with Elliptical Hole. In: 2011 Fourth International Conference on Information and Computing, pp 338-41
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi
Experimental and numerical methods can be used to investigate transient fracture mechanisms and crack distribution in thin steel plates with holes under high loading.
In the experimental method, it is possible to check the mechanical behavior of the steel plate under high loading by using tensile and bending tests. These tests can help identify weak points and fractures in the steel plate.
In the numerical method, finite element modeling software can be used to simulate the mechanical behavior of steel plates under high loading. These simulations can help us identify transient failure mechanisms and crack distribution in perforated steel plates under high loading.
In both experimental and numerical methods, equipment such as electron microscopes and digital imaging tools can be used to investigate transient failure mechanisms and crack distribution. By using these tools, it is possible to identify weak points and fractures in steel plates more precisely.
On the other hand, to investigate transient failure mechanisms and crack distribution in steel plates with holes, the necessary precautions must be taken in terms of safety and hygiene. For example, safety clothing and masks must be used, and safety devices must also be used to perform tests.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
Hi,
I'm trying to simulate the crack behaviour in the fracture toughness test (CT sample) in ABAQUS using the XFEM crack mode. To simplify the condition, I implemented a uniaxial load. However, the crack seems to proceed to some extent, then rotates as observable in the attached image and propagates.
Changing the mesh size seemed not have an impact on the problem. Also, I moved the crack plan so that the crack tip is not on the node and is inside an element, but the problem persists.
Material properties are typical of Maraging steel (Maxps = 2100 MPa, damage evolution = 0.01).
Please tell me if any other information need to be presented.
Can anyone help me with this?
Bset,
Mohammad.
Relevant answer
Answer
There is an option in the Abaqus where you can scale the deformation. Usually, there are some irregularities in mesh or BC which are difficult to observe at a scale factor of 1. Just observe any output results but scale them, like 1000 times or higher to observe. I am attaching a Fig. for your reference to use a scale factor.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
I am trying to calculate the percentage of retained austenite in Maraging steel through XRD analysis.
How can the chemical compositional % of each element present in the martensite and retained austenite be calculated in order to determine the amount of retained austenite using XRD? In addition, which one contains more iron (Fe): martensite or retained austenite?
ICP provides data for the entire alloy and not for the individual elemental composition of each phase. Can we utilize the EDX results to determine the composition of each individual phase, though?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear friend Qanita Tayyaba
Determining the chemical composition of individual phases, such as martensite and retained austenite, in a material like Maraging steel requires advanced characterization techniques. While XRD analysis can provide information about phase identification and phase fractions, it does not directly provide information about the chemical composition of each phase. However, there are complementary techniques that can be used to determine the elemental composition of individual phases.
One commonly used technique is Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS or EDX), which is typically coupled with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). EDX analysis can provide qualitative and quantitative elemental composition information within specific regions of interest. By analyzing different areas of martensite and retained austenite using EDX, it is possible to determine the elemental composition of each phase.
To calculate the percentage of retained austenite in Maraging steel, XRD analysis can be used to measure the phase fractions. However, to determine the chemical composition of each phase, EDX analysis or other techniques like electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) or wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDS) would be more suitable.
Regarding the question of which phase, martensite or retained austenite, contains more iron (Fe), it depends on the specific alloy composition and heat treatment conditions. Generally, martensite is a solid solution of carbon and iron and contains a higher percentage of iron compared to retained austenite, which is a metastable form of austenite. However, the exact iron content in each phase can vary based on the alloy composition and processing parameters.
For more detailed information on determining the chemical composition of different phases and the iron content in martensite and retained austenite, I recommend consulting the following references:
1. Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. (2017). Martensite and Bainite in Steels: Transformation Mechanisms, Mechanical Properties and Applications. Woodhead Publishing.
2. Ceschini, L., Bartolucci, G., & Rambaldi, E. (2010). Characterization of retained austenite in maraging steel: Comparison between different techniques. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 527(4-5), 1198-1206.
3. Li, L., Li, W., & Huang, M. (2019). Quantitative analysis of retained austenite by X-ray diffraction. Materials Characterization, 147, 61-70.
These references provide insights into the analysis of retained austenite and the determination of elemental composition in different phases of steel alloys.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I have monitored EIS of inhibitor film-coated carbon steel substrate and found the impedance of this kind of impedance response. What can be the plausible explanation behind the variation in impedance at different ranges of frequencies?
Relevant answer
Could you provide the nyquist diagram corresponding to the bode diagram that you provided?
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
#continuouscasting #steel #SEN #clogging
Is there any literature available on this topic?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello!
There are several reasons for the clogging of SEN.
The most important of them is the deposition on SEN walls of corundum graphite of the products of deoxidation of steel with aluminum. At the same time, aluminates are also present in the body of SEN, which undoubtedly contributes to their interaction with each other.
Other important manifestations include:
- deposition of metal drops on the inner surface of SEN due to the disruption of the connection between the SEN and the dispenser nozzle and the development of the splashing effect;
– inconsistency of the design of SEN with pouring modes or the use of low-quality SEN;
- a low level of personnel qualification, when due to a drop in the metal pouring level in the tundish, the coating slag is captured and SEN can clogging over almost instantly.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
I want finding metallurgical length of high alloy steel in continuous casting.
Relevant answer
Answer
HI
In continuous casting of steel, metallurgical length (ML) is the distance between the exit from the mold and the point of full solidification of a steel slab,As ML depends on several factors like casting speed,steel grade,spray water cooling,machine design etc. it is difficult to evolve an
empirical formula solely based on chemical analysis of steel in this complex domain. But external factors by and large the same(keeping constant),through using normalization mathematical techniques i believe one can arrive at an empirical solution depending on steel grade.
thanks & regards,
g.sudhakar
phd(material engineering)
hcu.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
1 answer
Several companies export raw materials to different countries. In return, those countries import finished products from those supplies at high prices.
In your opinion, what hampers these suppliers to connect with SMEs to produce within a country?
who do you think has more challenges upsream (suppliers of raw material) or downstream (SMEs) to adopt this strategy? or any other player? thoughts/suggestions are welcomed. Chers
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear friend Mir Dost
According to a post on ResearchGate, several companies export raw materials to different countries. In return, those countries import finished products from those supplies at high prices. The post also mentions that upstream manufacturing firms (i.e., steel, aluminum, plastic) can face challenges to connect with downstream SMEs to manufacture produce locally (What challenges upstream manufacturing firms...).
In addition, a McKinsey report states that 45% of small businesses have experienced disruptions in supply chains in June 2020. In many cases, leading firms have handed risks down the supply chain to vulnerable SMEs in developing countries, causing job losses and even bankruptcies. Regarding your second question, it is difficult to say who has more challenges upstream or downstream. Both parties face different challenges. For example, upstream manufacturers may face challenges such as raw material availability and transportation costs while SMEs may face challenges such as access to finance and technology. (Helping small and medium-size enterprises thrive..).
On the other hand, the OECD states that SMEs can often be more flexible and responsive to customer needs than large integrated firms. They can pool resources and share the costs of training, research and marketing. Clustering facilitates exchange of personnel and diffusion of technology and creates new possibilities for efficiency gains. This report mentions that they can pool resources and share the costs of training, research and marketing. Clustering facilitates exchange of personnel and diffusion of technology and creates new possibilities for efficiency gains (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Local Strength, Global Reach......).
I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Source:
(3) Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Local Strength, Global Reach - OECD. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/1918307.pdf.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
I have submitted my manuscript to Steel and Composite Structures Journal two days ago. However, until now, I have not received a confirmation email from this journal. At the end of the submission steps, it was written that "Congratulations! Your Submission has been completed!"
Is this normal? What should I do now?
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with Dr Kaleeswaran Balasubramaniam that patience is required for now (beyond getting official confirmation, as I suggested before). Some of the posts on RG tell the story that other people were waiting for a very long time (up to two years) to get a decision. That is assuming they got acknowledgement in the first place, which is obviously what you are missing.
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
4 answers
1. The elastic column has the ability to move elastically in the earthquake as it also has the necessary plasticity for inelastic displacements. On the other hand, it does not put down large torques at the base However, the column does not have dynamics like a rigid reinforced wall, and it does not have a second lever arm in width, which reduces the overturning moment. The wall has great dynamics towards the earthquake, it has a second lever arm in width that reduces the overturning moment, but it does not have great plasticity and on the other hand, it lowers large moments to the base due to stiffness and breaks beams and joists. Also, due to greater mass, the inertia of the structure increases and thus the seismic loads. Question Is there a vertical load-bearing element that has a double lever arm, ductility, elasticity, dynamics, and does not transmit its moment to the beams and joists, and is strong towards the intersection of the base, and economical with the minimum steel reinforcement? Yes there is. But they don't use it It is called an elongated wall with prestressed and ground-consolidated ends.
2. If we want to increase the response of the structure to the earthquake, we increase the mass of the concrete by building walls and large beams. We are still increasing the steel reinforcement. Nicely we built a dynamic rigid structure something like a reinforced concrete precast which has great dynamics. Normally it should withstand the earthquake. However, it does not last, especially when the construction is tall. The reasons are as follows. By increasing the mass, we also increase the inertia of the structure and thus the seismic loads. By increasing the height and stiffness we increase the overturning moment These three factors, if they do not overturn the structure, will at least create a small overturning - swelling in the area of the base of the building. The structure losing partial soil support will divert the now unsupported static loads to the beam cross-sections and break them. This happens when we increase the dimensions of the load-bearing organism to increase the dynamic response of the structure. Question There is a solution? Yes, there is a solution. We must increase the dynamics of the structure without increasing its mass, which causes greater inertia. That is, we can increase the linear and transverse reinforcement, and the quality of the concrete, as well as reduce the diameter (not the kilograms) of the reinforcement, in order to achieve greater resistance, in terms of the shear failure of the coating concrete, due to its super strength steel in tension. This they do today and have greatly improved the dynamics and ductility, but greatly increased the cost of steel reinforcement. A steel of diameter Φ/50 has the ability to lift a two-story building with an area of 100 m2 weighing 140 tons, and today they put 8500 kg of steel on the two-story and we have failures in large earthquakes. And this is because the concrete cannot hold the steel reinforcement in it to cooperate and it breaks. Is there another solution? Yes, there is another solution and it is the one I propose. This solution removes 80% of the reinforcement so the construction becomes more economical. This solution triples the dynamic response of the structure to seismic displacements, without increasing the mass, i.e. the inertia that causes the seismic loads, and this happens because the force that counteracts the earthquake comes from an external factor, that of the ground, so it has no mass added to the structure. This solution diverts the seismic loads outside the structure and the structure is not stressed by the earthquake. This solution is called an elongated wall with prestressed and soil-consolidated ends.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for sharing this interesting topic !!!
Best regards
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
I run an impedance test with mild steel coated with polymer coating. The impedance is showing very abnormal pattern as shown in the pic. On the other hand, when I was running the same Nyquist test with stainless steel it is showing quite a normal graph. Can someone suggest me the real reason why the impedance data is showing very abnormal reading. Thank you.
Working electrode : Polymer coated mild steel sample.
Reference : Saturated calomel electrode
Counter : Graphite counter electrode
Relevant answer
Answer
What kind of organic coating and electrochemical set up do you use. I think that you have a problem with parameters of your set-up - a high impedance of coating and small impedance od EIS apparatus.
stefan
  • asked a question related to Steel
Question
2 answers
Could you please provide insights on the potential impact of adding a DC bias to a sample of Q235 steel magnetized using magnetoacoustic emission (MAE) technique? Specifically, I am interested in understanding how the DC bias may affect the permeability, flux density, or magnetic field behavior of the sample.
Relevant answer
Answer
Respected Professor Kaushik Shandilya
Thank you for your insightful response to my question regarding the potential impact of adding a DC bias. As you rightly pointed out, the specific application or goal for adding a DC bias to MAE may vary depending on the context.
In the context of enhancing the sensitivity of signals, particularly considering the low signal-to-noise ratio associated with MAE, would adding a DC bias in a direction parallel to the applied MAE direction be helpful? I am curious to know if this approach could potentially amplify the magnetization of the sample and increase the amplitude of the acoustic wave, thereby improving the sensitivity of the measurement.
Thank you again for your valuable input and assistance.