Science topic
Writing - Science topic
The act or practice of literary composition, the occupation of writer, or producing or engaging in literary work as a profession.
Questions related to Writing
- A. Result
- B. Methodology
- C. Discussion
- D. Introduction
What informs industrial democracy
How to write a cover letter for journal submission ?
We are preparing to write some review articles on molecular biology of human diseases. Is there anybody expert who wants to participate?
My e-mail address: [email protected]
Please write to me and give some info about yourself.
Dear researchers and scientific authors, 📚 We are currently collecting contributions for a book on Biomass waste towards sustainable industrial applications that will be published by Springer in 2025. We firmly believe in the wealth of your knowledge and expertise to enrich this project. 🌐 If you would like to share your research and insights in the field of biomass waste valorization and sustainable applications, we warmly invite you to contribute by writing a chapter for our book. 📆 If you are interested or know someone who might be, please contact me directly.
email: [email protected]
I’m writing a mixed methods systematic review, and I was about to start my write up when I realised the majority of my papers are cross sectional studies. I know that this isn’t technically primary data. Would this invalidate my dissertation.
Im asking this to get understanding of what the experts think is research topics that is easy for me to do when i get to honours .A topic that needs research to be done .Im writing a concept and will attach it to my Hons Biokinetics and Hons Sports Sci application .I want to write this concept on a topic that a Bio and HP student can work on so if i get into either honours programme i can just get going with my research .Instead of writing two concept notes i just want to write one since it will be my first time writing it .Im going to write it up in my june holidays before semester 2 starts so i can apply to honours with it .Any advice would be appreciated
“History Is Written by the Victors”
This quote is often attributed to Winston Churchill !?
The emeritus professor Art Hobson in his article
"Realist Analysis of Six Controversial Quantum Issues"
from Academia.org writes( ):
“Schrödinger's equation for, say. a moving electron is clearly a "field equation" for a scalar (i.e. number-valued rather than vector-valued) field y(x, y, z,t) entirely analogous to Maxwell's equations for the vector EM field E(x, y, z. t), B(x, y. z, t). Nevertheless, the QP founders retained the Newtonian language, speaking consistently of quantum "mechanics" and quantum "particles." Physicists continue to apply the term "particle" to essentially every quantum object, including even the Higgs field which is clearly a universe-filling quantized field. Because language so shapes our perception of reality. I doubt we will transcend our quantum confusion until we adopt more appropriate words. Electrons, photons, and other quanta are not "particles."
The question of fields versus particles is crucial because, once one adopts the particle misconception, most other issues become unfathomable. For example, if quanta are particles separated by empty space, distant nonlocal comiections become incomprehensible.”
Yes this precisely my main concern since some time ago, as it is energy the fundamental issue, that can be solved if the Basic Systemic Unit is used to deduce the fundamental equations of physics, such as that of QP that defines the behavior of our first form of "measurable" energy, I mean the electron.
For it the concept of particle cannot be applied as it does not behave like that.
Edgar Paternina
\documentclass[legalpaper, 12pt, addpoints]{exam}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{tcolorbox}
\usepackage[paper=a4paper]{geometry}\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage{ucs}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{makeidx}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\usepackage{subfig}
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
%\usepackage{natbib}
\patchcmd{\abstract}{\null\vfil}{}{}{}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
%\newtheorem{defn}{Definition}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}[section]
\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}[section]
%\theoremstyle{definition}
\usepackage{draftwatermark}
\SetWatermarkLightness{ 0.96}
\SetWatermarkText{Walle\&Mitiku}
\SetWatermarkScale{1.25}
\newtheorem{defn}{Definition} [section]
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
%\numcoverpages
\firstpageheadrule{}{}{}
\rhead{Mathematics for Natural Sciences}
\chead{}
\lhead{Mizan Tepi Universty}
\runningheadrule
\firstpagefootrule{}{}{}
\lfoot{Math1011 }
\cfoot{ \thepage}
\rfoot{Final Exam~~~\today}
\runningfootrule
\setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
\linespread{1.5}
\topmargin -0.1in
\setlength{\topmargin}{-10pt}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-2 pt}
\oddsidemargin -20pt
\evensidemargin -1pt
\headheight -0.2in
\headsep 0.3in
\rightmargin -2pt
\leftmargin -2pt
\leftmargin 0in
\textheight 9.2in
\textwidth 6.7in
\parindent 0in
\parskip 0in
\author{walle Tilahun}
\pagenumbering{arabic}
%\usepackage{background}
%\backgroundsetup{contents=\includegraphics{Capture}, scale=, opacity=0.35}
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{tikz}
\CorrectChoiceEmphasis{\itseries\color{red}}
\begin{document}
\begin{center}
\begin{coverpages}
\begin{center}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.25\linewidth]{mtu}
\end{center}
\textbf{MIZAN TEPI UNIVERSITY\\}
\textbf{COLLEGE OF NATURAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE\\ DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS\\Mathematics for Natural Sciences(Math1011) \\Final Exam for First Year Regular Students.~~~~Total mark:~~~~40\%~~~~~ \today}
\end{center}
\vspace{5mm}
\makebox[0.95\textwidth]{Name:\enspace\hrulefill section:\enspace\hrulefill$Id~N_o$~~~ /----/~~~~Time ~~3:00hr}
%\end{center} \newpage
\extraheadheight{-0.8in}
\parbox{6in}{{\textbf{General Instructions:}\\ The exam consisting of 22 questions having 4 True/ false ,4 short answer,8 multiple choice,and 6 workout items within 4 pages.
}
\vspace{0.15in}}
\fbox{\fbox{\parbox{7in}{
\begin{itemize}
\item Before you are starting to do please fill all the above informaton correctly.
\item Write your answer on the ansewrsheet only,and don't mark on the question paper.
\item Students should not to bring any electronic materials(mobiles,laptops.\dots) to exam hall.
\item Cheating in the examination in any form is a serious offense.
\end{itemize} }}}
\end{coverpages}
\end{center}
\parbox{6in}{\textsc{\textbf{Part I.} Write True if the statement is correct or write False if the statement is incorrect on the answersheet space provided(1 pts each) .}}
\vspace{0.1in}
\hrule
\vspace{0.1in}
\begin{questions}
\question Composition functions are always commutative, meaning \( f(g(x)) = g(f(x)) .\)
%\question The hyperbolic function $\cosh(x) $ is always positive for all real number $x$.
\question The graph of $y=sin(x)$ is an increasing function on $[\frac{3\pi}{4},\frac{5\pi}{4}]$
\question Every one to one functions has an inverse.
\question The simplified form of $\log_{5}^{(\log_{3}243)} =1$
\\\parbox{6in}{\textsc{\textbf{Part II.} Fill in the following blank spaces with approprate the most simplified answer for each questions (1pts for each).}}
\vspace{0.1in}
\hrule
\vspace{0.1in}
\question If \( f(x) = x^2 \) and \( g(x) = \sqrt{x} \), then \( (f \circ g)(4) \)=.
\question The domain of the function $f(x)=\sqrt{4-x^2}$ is=\dots\dots
%\question If $g(x)=2x+1$ and \( (f \circ g)(x) \)=$12x^2-2x-9$,then the function $f(x)$=
\question The value of $tanh(\ln3)$=\dots\dots
\question Suppose $f(x)=9-3^x$ ,then $f^{-1}(x)$=\dots\dots
\\\parbox{6in}{\textsc{\textbf{Part III.} Read the following questions carefully,then choose the correct answer from the suggested options and write only the letter of your choice on the separate answer sheet provided(1.5pts each).}}
\vspace{0.1in}
\hrule
\vspace{0.1in}
%\begin{questions}
\question Consider $f(x)=\log_{5}^{(x+4)}$, ~then which of the following is~\underline{Not true} about the graph of $f(x)$?
\begin{choices}
\CorrectChoice The y-axis is a vertical asymptote of the graph of $f(x) $
\choice The function increases as the value of x increases.
\choice the domain of $f(x)$ is the set of all real numbers greater than $-4$
\choice The x-intercept of the graph of $f(x)$ is $-3$
\end{choices}
\question Which one of the following is \underline{true} about $f(x)=x^3+4x^2+5x+2$.
\begin{choices}
\choice $x-2$ is a factor of $f(x)$
\CorrectChoice $x+2$ is afactor of $f(x)$
\choice $x-1$ is afactor of $f(x)$
\choice $3x+1$ is afactor of $f(x)$
\end{choices}
\newpage
\question What does it mean for a function to be one-to-one?
\begin{choices}
\choice Each output value corresponds to exactly one input value
\choice There is no restriction on the number of input-output pairs
\choice The function is not defined for certain values
\CorrectChoice Each input value corresponds to exactly one output value
\end{choices}
\question Which of the following expression is true about relation $R$?
\begin{choices}
\choice Domain$((R^{-1})^{-1})$= Domain$(R^{-1})$
\CorrectChoice Domain$(R)$= Range$(R^{-1})$
\choice Range$(R)$= Range$(R^{-1})$
\choice Domain$(R)$= Domain$(R^{-1})$
\end{choices}
\question Which one of the follwing is correct about $f(x)=-3+\log_{2}(x-1)$?
\begin{choices}
\CorrectChoice x-intercept at $(1,0)$
\choice x=1 is a vertical asymptote
\choice the graph is logarthimc decay
\choice domain is the set of real number
\end{choices}
\question Suppose $f=\{(1,2),(3,5),(6,7)\}$ and $g=\{(a,1),(b,3),(c,6),(d,8)\}$, then $f\circ g$=
\begin{choices}
\choice $\{(1,2),(3,5),(6,7),(d,8)\}$
\choice $\{(a,2),(b,5),(c,7)\} $
\choice $\{(a,1),(b,7),(c,3)\}$
\CorrectChoice $\{(2,a),(5,b),(7,c),(8,d)\}$
\end{choices}
\question The solution set of $\log_{2}^{(x+2)}-\log_{2}^{(x-1)}=2$ is$\dots$
\begin{choices}
\choice $\frac{2}{35}$
\choice $\frac{35}{2}$
\choice $-2$
\CorrectChoice $2$
\end{choices}
\question Let $tan\theta=\frac{3}{4}$ and $sin\theta<0$,then the value of $cos\theta$ is\dots
\begin{choices}
\CorrectChoice $\frac{4}{5}$
\choice $\frac{3}{5}$
\choice $\frac{-4}{5}$
\choice $\frac{-3}{5}$
\end{choices}
\parbox{6in}{\textsc{\textbf{Part II.} read the following questions correctly,then show all necessary steps neatly and correctly on the answer sheet provided (20pts ).}}
\vspace{0.1in}
\hrule
\vspace{0.1in}
\question Show that $2cosh^2(x)-cosh(2x)=1$~~~$\dots\dots\dots(2pts ) $
\question Let $h(x)=4^x$,then show that $h(x+2)=16h(x)$.~~$\dots(2pts ) $
\question Find all solutions when extracting the $3rd$ root of the complex number $z = 4i$.~~$\dots\dots\dots(4pts ) $
\question Find the point $p(x_0,y_0)$ that divides the line segment $AB$ joining points $A(2,3)$ and $B(7,-2)$ in the ratio $2:3$.~~$\dots\dots\dots(4pts ) $\\
a. ~Does the point $p(x_0,y_0)$ lie on the line $L:x-5y+15=0$? ~~ \\b.~Find the distance between $p(x_0,y_0)$ and $L:x-5y+15=0$ ~~
\question Let $g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x)=\sqrt[3]{x+1}$, then show that $g(x)$ is a one to one correspondence. ~~$\dots(4pts ) $
\question If $f(x)=\frac{3x+4}{x^2-9}$,~then find ~~$\dots\dots\dots(4pts ) $
\begin{itemize}
\item[a] the domian of $f(x)$
\item [b] the x-intercept and y-intercept of $f(x)$
\item [c]all asymptotes of $f(x)$
\item[d] Sketch the graph of $f(x)$.
\end{itemize}
\section*{Bonus(3\%):Sketch the graph of $f(x)=2-2^{-x}$,then discuss the domain,range,intercepts,and asymptetes clearly and correctlly.}
\end{questions}
\end{document}
Dear sir/madam,
I hope this mail finds you well. I am writing to express my keen interest to make you as editorial board member of newly proposed journal [Tying to submit proposal to Elsevier] in the title of "Journal of Sustainable AI and IoT sensor data".
In this regards, i would like to know your interest towards this proposal. If it is , kindly share your detailed CV to [email protected]
Thank you
The protocol should indicate how the study will contribute to advancement of knowledge ,how the results will be utilized ,not only in the publications but also how they will likely affect the health care ,health systems and health policies.
Hello,
I am a student from Vytautas Magnus University. I am currently writing my bachelor's thesis on decision-making styles and divergent thinking. I read your article about adapting its decision-making to another language. I wanted to ask, maybe you know which order the questions of the questionnaire are supposed to be in and could tell it to me?
Thanks for Your response in advance.
Regards,
Vitoldas
Department of Psychology
Faculty of Social Sciences
Vytautas Magnus University
Lithuania
What is the typical viscosity range for ceramic pastes used for the Direct Ink Writing (extrusion) process? I have read several articles, and all give different figures; I saw somewhere else that between 20 Pa.s and 50 Pa.s is ideal. What is your answer to this?
I am writing articles on Electrical and Protection Automation, IoT and Artificial Intelligence, I am looking like minded people who can be a co-author with me.
Thanks and Regards,
Madhu
Good day, colleagues. I do now write a thesis about the status of Jerusalem in the conflict between Israel and Palestine and my interest fell on the question of Jerusalem's special regime. however, I failed to find any work dedicated to this plan. I know that I was never created, but its interesting to look how modern researchers analyze at least theoretically its chances fo success
# 126
Dear Alessio Ishizaka · Enrique MU
I read your paper
What is so special about the analytic hierarchy and network process?
My comments
First of all, I want to congratulate you for your extensive bibliographical search about AHP and ANP. I am impressed by the number of authors you mention in your paper, and by your comments.
However, it is only a bibliographic search enumerating papers written on AHP and ANP, but there is not a single line that justifies these methods, other than mentioning the large number of papers published, which is undisputable, and by far more than other MCDM methods
Obviously, you are an advocate of the method and wanted to make its virtues known, but you do not even mention its drawbacks, that outperform several times over those good attributes it may have. You mention multiple applications of AHP, the same as other methods that are not ‘special’, and no mention is done on AHP abundant limitations. Therefore, your analysis is biased.
Technically, AHP is a descriptive process, and as that irrational, considering that it is based on intuitions, very useful in many aspects of life, but normally useless when applied to serious MCDM scenarios, and thus, assuming that the DM judgements are applicable to real-life, and to thousands or millions of persons, against common sense and something that nobody can accept.
AHP is based on the wishes and moods of individuals pursuing what they perceive or feel, without reasoning, which is natural in many instances of our life, instead on addressing on what it ought to be as in normative rational methods, which not coincidently constitute the largest number of MCDM methods. In my opinion, AHP may be appropriate to personal decisions like selecting a restaurant or a site for and you say that it is due to easiness of uses and a vacation, but it has no place in complex scenarios. Simply, it cannot manage them.
However, as you mention, it is the most used MCDM method, due to its easiness, which is true, and to its rigorous mathematical base, which is false.
AHP is probably the easiest MCDM method to learn. The DM determines the criteria, alone or with experts, but curiously, without considering the alternatives they must evaluate, and then compares two criteria at a time and assign a value according to his intuition, and that is all.
Even if he does not reason ‘appropriately’, that is, transitively or consistently according to percentage, the software refutes him and -suggests’ a correction. The DM has no alternative but accept, as a robot, it does not matter if he agrees or not.
What the DM does not realize is that a decrease, for instance from 7 to 6, is not minor, due to the ratio or logarithm scale, the method remains silent about that. Please, correct me If I am mistaken.
In addition, one wonders, and AHP does not explain it, why the DM must be coherent or consistent in his/her estimates? As an example, if you must select among three restaurants A, B and C for dinner and comparing quality and price, and you already determined that for you, quality is three times more important than price, and for that reason, close A, that is, you prefer to lose some money to get a gain in quality.
Now you compare A and C and finds that C has also a good quality, but at a considerably lower price, and you decide that you prefer to lose a little quality, to get a gain in price. That is, you reversed your priorities.
Finally, comparing B and C you reach the conclusion that both have good quality and good price, so it is indistinct what you chose
Consequently, A>B=C>A, there is not transitivity here. And what is wrong with this analysis? Nothing, just human decision. This elemental example also shows two AHP errors.
First, it considers that weights are constant. As you can see, they could not be, and
Second, criteria depend on the alternatives, not the other way around. If you do not have alternatives, it means that always, and for everything, i.e., houses, trips, careers, cars, food, furniture, etc. you prefer quality on price.
A>B=C>A, does this mean that you must respect transitivity?
In AHP, it does not matter that the DM must judge on items on what he may not have the faintest idea, like comparing cost with contamination, cost with public health, or cost with manufacture, and thus, assuming that he must be an expert or knowledgeable in each area, or posses the expertise each stakeholder has in the company that owns the project. I think that you will agree that this is something hard to digest.
In my opinion you should explain which were the advances in AHP that you mention. Which advances, using fuzzy, or becoming hybrid with other methods like TOPSIS or DEMATEL, to name only some of them?
When you consider these serious hidden shortcomings. it is natural that people select AHP; it makes practitioners believe that complex problems can be solved by intuition. Reasoning, researching, consulting, examining? What for? That is unnecessary as per AHP standards. One of the things that bother the most in AHP it is the lack of rational explanations.
What happens if the scenario demands using Boolean notation, i.e., 1 or 0, or if there is precedence between alternatives, or if criteria are interrelated, or if some alternatives are exclusive and other inclusive, or if a criterion establishes conditions on another? According to AHP the solution is easy: Just disregard all of these irrelevant and annoying characteristics of the problem.Don’t worry, simply, ignore all of them; nobody will notice, because the results cannot be validated, since there is not a yardstick to compare to, and also because many journals’ reviewers will accept that and approve the manuscript, something extremely frequent.
Just read the abstracts of problems ‘solved’ by AHP in Scopus on in the Web. The most common is that they disregard something that Saaty said very clearly and in writing: AHP works only - and with reason - with independent criteria, something difficult to find in most real-life projects. Just for that simple fact most AHP solutions are invalid. By the way, it is very easy to prove that Saaty was right in this.
This is the reason of the ‘success’ of AHP. Nobody will discuss it, as nobody rebutted me when I denounced these things along my eight years in RG, and after 270,380 readings of my questions and answers, and 2,277 contributions as of today, according to metrics from this platform.
Curiously, along these years nobody rebutted none of what I assert. Extract your own conclusions.
AHP was useful back in the 70s, but now it is history, ANP, based on the same principles and arbitrariness of AHP, is however a little better, because it is more realistic although very difficult to understand, and also assuming some inexistent concepts such as impact and feedback, and that were never explained by Saaty.
AHP violates System’s’ Theory by claiming that one of its greatest advantages is the decomposition of a problem. True, for understanding it, but not for solving.
You cannot maximize or minimize a criterion independently of the others, because a problem is a system, and as that, it must be solved considering everything at the same time. It is as studying the performance of a car selecting independently the best engine, the best transmission, the best tires, and the best style. It cannot be done separately, due to the fact that the aerodynamics of the car, its tires, its transmission, electronic and electric system, etc. are input to design the best engine. Sounds reasonable?
However, this is what AHP does, and that ANP improvedby using a network.
I guess that Saaty understood that AHP was faulty on this regard, and then decided to correct it by developing ANP, and in so doing burying AHP, and this took place more that 30 years ago.
AHP is the most used MCDM in the world? Absolutely true, but why?
Because it has managed to convince people that real-life problems can be easily solved by intuition, as for instance complex problems like regional planning, or deciding by intuition that photovoltaics cells are better than wind turbines to generate electricity.
They are only technical issues, why to bother with them?
AHP is a system based on false assumptions such as:
1- You can compare two different criteria, that is legit, but what you cannot do is assign a value to those preferences. How for instance, do you decide that tenderness is say three times more important than love? This comparison is fantasy.
2- AHP assumes (Saaty words), that trade-offs are equivalent to weights. Both are completely different concepts and not interchangeable.
3- AHP assumes that what is the mind of the DM, can be applied to the real-world. This may be true only in his / her imagination, and convinced because AHP quietly equals them.
Explanation? No, what for?
4- On what grounds AHP assumes that criteria weights are constant? This misjudgement can be easily demonstrated, as I have done many times in RG
5- To say nothing that the DM is reduced to the role of a robot, when a formula instructs him/her to correct him or herself
6- Where is the rational in using compensation, that means that increasing in 0.5 human health is compensated by a proportional decrease in land use or in paving roads? This is a disparate.
7- Who says they these trade-offs are lineal? Only suppositions and because they were normalized to sum 1.
8- What axiom says that the DM may vote for hundreds or thousands of people? Quite the opposite, the Arrow ‘s theorem just addresses this issue and of course denies it, calling this action a dictatorship.
9- Even the so-called fundamental table is dubious, because it is a poor imitation of the Weber and Fechter law relating incentives increases with log responses. AHP happily assumes that the value in criterion C1 on C5 or ratio importance, equals to incentives increases.
10- Can you imagine using AHP or ANP in simulation where you have to change parameters hundreds of times? It would be a nightmare.
11- How useful can be a method where the criteria must be independent?
I can continue, but this is enough to prove the falsehood of AHP.
I have been many years in RG and since the very first date I commented AHP, mentioning these very aspects. If I were wrong it would have been natural that scientists and practitioners would have rebutted me. Again, I never received a rebuttal. Why?
For obvious reasons: There are not responses to them.
I want now to address some specific points of your paper:
1- In page 2 you say “development of the theoretical foundations of the AHP”
A researcher may have as many theories as he wants; the problem is to demonstrate a mathematical as well as common sense foundation, both absent in AHP, other than the Eigen Value and geometric mean. All other are only assumptions like results from pair-wise comparisons, trade-offs equivalence to weights, need of transitivity, weights that can evaluate alternatives, sensitivity analysis using the ceteris paribus principle, existence of feedback in ANP. etc.
None of them are mathematical, and many rejected by scientists
2- Using fuzzy AHP? What for? To improve arbitrary values?
3- In page 3 you speak about modelling, possibly the most important aspect to be considered in MCDM. It appears that the meaning and importance of modelling is absent in AHP, where it reduces to putting values in a matrix.
Modelling means to represent as close as possible a project or scenario in a mathematical format or matrix. Since I speak based on facts, I will put some examples:
a) How do you model in AHP, that alternative A4 must precede only alternatives A1, A2, A3, A9?. This is applied anywhere as in manufacturing, construction, health cate, etc.
b) How do you model in AHP, that considering alternatives A2 and A7 they are exclusive, i.e., it is one or the other, therefore, one of them must not be in the ranking. This is usual in road projects, for instance determining the best route between two cities.
c) How do you model in AHP that a criterion such as heavy snowfall may alter another criterion as maximum speed in a road, or in other words, the speed criterion depends on the heavy snowfall criterion, only when a certain value is reached. Used in hgh mountain highway is comparison with lower-level routes, of in modal transportation.
d) How do you model in AHP that an alternative must comply with a certain number of criteria? For instance: A6 and A8 must satisfy at least these four criteria C5, C7, C8 and C14. A common question when analyzing urban planning
e) How do you model in AHP, that if alternative A7 is selected, also A1 must be selected?
Found in sewerage networks
f) How do you model in AHP that a certain alternative must forcefully be in the ranking? Typical of projects already initiated or for pollical reasons.? For instance, a promise made by a candidate to major before elections
g) How do you model in AHP that out of 89 environmental indicators, the DM wants as a result only 25 to analyze. Used in selecting indicators
h) . How do you model in AHP, that when you reduce indicators, the resulting indicators in the final result must incorporate as much as possible the information contained in the alternatives not considered in the ranking? Used in urban and regional planning
i) How can you use the same criterion with two different means? For example, in providing water to a housing complex you need to establish a minimum and a maximum limit simultaneously, in such a way for the software to work within these limits?
I have many more questions like these most of them encountered in real-life problems in my life and all of them addressed using MCDM methods. Could you please consider answering how would you model them in AHP or even in ANP?
I will be grateful for your answer
I my humble opinion, it is evident in analyzing these real-world scenarios that AHP was not designed to solve complex problems, but perhaps I am mistaken of did not understand the power of AHP, and for this reason I ask for your answers. Using your own words, which are then the morphological ways used in AHP to solve real problems?
4- In page 7 you cite “I get it, it is like going to the optometrist who asks you whether you see better with one lens or the other; except that there is the additional question of how much better can you see?”
This known example reminds me another from Saaty relative to determine areas of geometrical figures. Both examples are biased because in both cases you know the real result which allows you to make comparisons. As you know, this situation ss inexistent in MCDM
5- In your page 8 you make references to rank reversal in AHP
Yes, it was discovered in AHP, but later it was discovered that it is common practically in all MCDM methods.
In my opinion it is an unavoidable phenomenon related not with the MCDM methods but due to geometrical reasons. It was nothing to do with inconsistencies.
I would love to discuss this subject with you publicly or privately, either in RG, email, or WhatsApp.
Nolberto Munier
Hello,
for my master thesis i need to write a section about electrochemical potential
what is it and its unflunce on the electrochemical cell.
could any one of you please give me some refrences which could help!
thanx
Hello,
Currently, I am writing my master thesis proposal. I have been to provide a method paper for (question creation and interview evaluation). It's my first time planning to conduct interviews. I feel confused here.
Any tips how to write the method paper for (question creation and interview evaluation). I would appreciate if someone has a template or an example.
Thanks!
Hi everyone, for some years now I've been interested in doing meta-analysis in my field of study. I am a botanist, who recently worked in seed biology. during my self-learning, I already knew how to do systematic reviews, but stuck there while I wanted to improve myself in meta-analysis.
Thus, I write to express my desire to reach everyone who may have experience in this topic and is willing to let me learn from their experience. thanks.
I propose that seismologists in the Middle East zone join forces for peace and security for those living in all countries of the Middle East. I am ready to create a united Short-Term Forecast Network Center based on my patent.
From Israel, I cannot write separately to seismologists in some countries (you understand why). Therefore, all correspondence will initially be open in this topic. When we create an enterprise in one of the leading countries with the approval of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, then we will decide where to organize the training Academy. First, I recommend reading book_KaY_ENG_FINAL.pdf
I have found five of this flat worm near the river Rhin, under stones, I can't fine what species it could be. For the file name I write D. romanodanubiale, but I don't think it is this species. It is about 1,5 cm long.
Regards.
I need to use Peng Robinson with Volume explicit to do the parcial derivative dv/dT with P constant of this equation.
I want to write theoritical analysis of DL model how it is better than other models. Please any one idea how to write theoritical analysis of DL model or provide any article for referecne or tutorial to write such discussion in paper.
I am interested in learning more about the issues, challenges or controversies surrounding the process writing approach to teaching. Could anyone provide insight or experience regarding the difficulties encountered in implementing this approach in the classroom? What other controversial aspects or criticisms of the process writing approach are there that educators should consider? I would be very grateful for any input or perspective.
1. Have you come across students using ChatGTP to submit a paper?
2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of ChatGTP and AI in education and academia?
3 How will it enhance learning?
4. How will it compromise academic integrity?
5. How about researchers who use ChatGTP to write?
I am curious if we, the epidemiologists and public health physicians, could think of modified methods using AI in future research some of those may be challenging the traditional epidemiological study designs.
I will be happy to welcome suggestions and ideas in this context, and to perhaps write an article together in this context.
Hi everyone,
Do you know (and recommend) some journal with similar proposal to Nature Protocols or GPB? I am planning to write a paper for one of these journals, and I would like to have a Plan B or C.
Thanks!
Omer
Hi Everyone, I am studying the impact of culture shock on second language acquisition outcome. The hypothesis of my study was : "Culture shock has a negative effect on the overall second language acquisition of students. Moreover, listening, speaking, reading, and writing aspects of second language acquisition will all be negatively affected."
The results of my study showed that culture shock has a negative impact on overall second language acquisition and speaking,reading and writing aspects. However, there is no effect of culture shock on the listening aspect.
So, how should I write the conclusion of my study? should I write that my hypothesis is rejected or should I write it is partially accepted?
Thank you
I am new to write research articles. My reseach area is Computer science and applications.Please give some ideas.
Dear connections,
I am undertaking a Master of Philosophy in IT and as so far progressed with my thesis writing and nearing completion.
I am kindly seeking if anyone is interested in helping me review my thesis, please contact me so that I can share the copy with you as I need your feedback/reviews/comments before I finalize for submission.
I truly appreciate your assistance.
Best Regards
Desmond Narongou
Does anyone know how hurricane are modeled in MATLAB? And how do I use its outputs to show the impact on the distribution network?
Dear colleagues
I was offered to write a chapter in a book for IntechOpen. Is it worth to publish them?
I am usually suspicious of such invitations. Therefore, I would appreciate your opinions in this regard and any past experiences of yours with this publisher.
This work is a project work requiring 600 words, 1.5 spacing, and Chicago Manual Style of Citation.
So help me write a complete project work now base on the above details giving.
Hello, I want to write a scientific research on a topic, but I lack the steps for writing the research and how to arrange and format the research
Why is forgiveness necessary for collective healing after Rwanda's genocide?
How can collective healing after the Rwanda's genocide work without forgiveness?
I need to write a 20 page research paper about these two questions
I was told to do this essay plan using the APA style of writing with citations and more references must be included. And word limit is 1500.
I am a student of public policy studying the policy cycle. I am curious about the potential role of citizens within this cycle as well as critique about the current situation I am writing from New Zealand, interested in health policy and also issues regarding the Treaty of Waitangi
Everyone knows simple classical model of dielectric susceptibility called Lorentz oscillator model, in other words, spring mass model. But I can't find it's all parameter values for different atoms: resonance (spontaneous) frequency - ω0 = \sqrt{k/m}, 2) effective mass of electron - m, 3) damping coefficient - γ = 1/τ, τ - relaxation/scattering time. If there are experimenters or specialists from relating fields which have knowledge of handbooks, databases, catalogs or any writings for experementers, of values of ω0, m, γ, plasma frequency ωp, real (refractive index or relative permittivity) and imaginary parts of susceptibilities \chi(1), please provide information on them.
Related question is the following: Has the Lorentz model expanded for diatomic, triatomic, ... multiatomic molecules? Is it useful for theoretical description of susceptibilities for multiatomic molecules? Why yes or why not? Please provide relevant information.
Thank you in advance...
Dear Colleagues
I am wondering if you would want to do collaborations to write articles about falls prevention in older adults.
Looking forward for your contact.
Kind regards
Tiago
I am interested in the role Artificial intelligence is playing in students writing practices.
Field notes: Where do you write in mixed research in any chapter?
In the procedures chapter or the results chapter? "In doctoral thesis"
I am writing a research paper on resolving workplace conflict. I need help writing problem statement and proposal and any suggestions for references.
English is not my first language, so I must rely on Grammarly to correct my manuscript. Recently, an American college student was on academic probation for using Grammarly in her assigned homework, which caught my attention. AI-generated manuscripts are considered non-acceptable by reputable scientific journals. Should Grammarly-assisted writing be regarded as an AI-generated one? What is the policy of the high-impact journals?
How to write hypothetical research proposal on climate change adaptation strategies adapted by farmers.
Words get thrown around. Terminology changes. Therefore, syntax is center of linguistics.
I have four for loops and one if statement. I want to write the algorithm correctly in IEEE format. Can you suggest examples (best be in latex)? Can you mention any link to learn steps to write them correctly?
Is discretizing a continuous mathematical model and performing its dynamical analysis an effective working method?
Is it a sufficient working method to write the discrete form (via Euler and so n) of the system of equations and perform numerical simulations on it, as is the case in the literature?
I'm in my final year how will i write my chapter two "literature review"
write the research proposal on workplace bulling and give sources?
l know it can vary depending on the specific journal and field of study. However, generally speaking, and in your opinion, what is the best time to submit a paper?
- June, July & August
- September, October & November
- December, January & February
- March, April & May
This is the input concerning these results:
** OUTPUT REQUESTS
**
*Restart, write, frequency=0
**
** FIELD OUTPUT: F-Output-1
**
*Output, field
*Element Output, directions=YES
DAMAGEC, DAMAGET, LE, PE, PEEQ, S
*Output, history,
*Node Output, nset=DeslU2m
U2,
*Node Output, nset=RFsuporte
RF2,
**
** HISTORY OUTPUT: H-Output-1
**
*Output, history, variable=PRESELECT
*End Step
What am I missing? I used to use old Abaqus versions, and this was never a problem. Could it be a bug? Should I be concerned?
Thanks in advance.
The following are the results of 4 channels of recovery of NPAs
H =21.402153
Chi square value= 7.814727903 , Alpha level= 0.05
P value 0.00008685210
Reject Null? Reject Null
With the general availability of Large Language Models (LLMs), will there soon be no point in writing academic papers? Similarly, if the brunt of text in papers will come from LLMs, will peer review become a pointless exercise?
I would like to calculate the volume from certain concentration,
people used 100 µL of 2 g/L solution then add to 100 ml acidic solution. how much volume should be if I will use concentration of 40 mg/L which will be added to 25 ml solution? Please write the calculations in details. Thanks
What are the common theories used in quantitative and qualitative study designs?
How to write credit lines for a figure or table that has been created by the author itself?
How can researchers effectively tailor their writing style and language to different audiences, such as peers, policymakers, or the general public?
Dear researchers,
I am writing to request clarification regarding the minimum number of papers needed for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Could you please offer some guidance on this issue?
Dear Team of Researchgate,
I'm writing this message because I realized somone is not the writer of the article called Propuesta intercultural para la enseñanza de cursos de español como lengua extranjera en Colombia written by Diego Alejandro Usma Restrepo. How can I edit him as author?
Thank you in advance for your help and guidance.
Waiting for a prompt response.
Who is researching or writing on the Gaianthropocene, also known as the Eco-Zoic or ecozoic era, the post anthropocene era? Please share links to articles or books. I'm convening a Free Online Summit on the topic on 20-21 April 2024. Over 45 speakers, dozens of Professors from Australia, Europe, UK and USA. More information at https://gaiarcadia.org/summit/ Free registration at https://events.humanitix.com/gaiarcadia-summit-2024 If you miss it ask how to access the recordings. Next summit will be 2026. New speakers welcome. Send topics and bios to [email protected].
I am Writing an article on "Mandal Art". I am not able to find literature. Please help me by providing articles on "Mandal Art".
If any respected member want to share the work with me.. i am ready.
We assume this form is inappropriate and misleading in many situations.
Numerical statistical mechanics that works efficiently to solve the heat diffusion equation as well as Schrödinger's PDE predicts a more appropriate eigenmatrix form,
( [B] + Constant. V[I] )= λ ( [B] + Constant. V[I] )
with the principal eigenvalue λ = 1 which is equivalent to the principle of least action.
It is clear that the vector V replaces Ψ^2.
This study is about inadequate acquisition of second language in the
subject of Expository Writing-I among the graduates of public sector university.
The primary purpose of writing exposition is to educate reader, not to fascinate
while presenting clear and organized subject matter. This dilemma has turned
into a grave issue when it comes to teach the subject of Expository Writing-I
How to write the research proposal
How to write the report?
Please can anyone suggest me how to write a book chapter in Elsevier?
My apologies if this is a silly question but I am a beginner/student and an amateur who is making his first attempt to write a manuscript. My mentor has been disappointingly unhelpful in this regard, therefore I am on my own.
Hello,
Which are some AI tools that researchers can use in writing scientific paper?
i need to write a literature review on the motivation factors that influence donors to give and be loyal to the charity they support.
Write the research proposal Evaluating the Feasibility and Strategies for the Entry of Tech Innovator into the Indian Market?
Do you think people should read more or write more to improve themselves?
we are writing four dermatological books that will publish in Springer and need experienced authors or co-authors for book chapters, DM if you are interested.
A discussion about the value and function of writing.
Should students be taught process writing or product writing? which one is more important for them to learn?
Hi,
I am going to graduate soon InshaaALLAH.
I have a plan to write a patent, I am currently working in the control and design laboratory and my Prof. expertise is also in control systems.
I will continue as a researcher in my current lab after my MS degree. So, I want to make this journey joyful and full of learning, and doing something great. I want to present some proposals to write a patent during my job as a researcher.
I believe that mechanical engineering is so old and already a lot of areas are explored and it is difficult to find some novel topics for research except integrating AI to make it novel.
I am open to recommendations that use AI in the control systems domain or LiDAR.
I am currently writing my dissertation and need to gain permission or purchase the Knowledge of Developmental Dyslexia Scale and the Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale, but I have had no luck acquiring either one.
How should ChatGPT and other intelligent chatbots be used so that it is ethical, socially responsible and does not break copyright? How should intelligent chatbots that are generative language models be used, so that the texts and other types of works created by tools based on generative artificial intelligence are created fairly, in accordance with the ethics of writing articles, certain documents, photos, graphics, videos, etc., and in such a way that, by the way, within the framework of this type of "creation", copyright is not violated, so that all the necessary footnotes to texts, documents, photos, etc. are reliably shown. source, so that a bibliography with all properly shown sources, source materials, references to source documents, so that materials, articles, books, documents and other source studies are properly and reliably cited?
As chatbots equipped with generative artificial intelligence technology are finding more and more applications within the framework of supporting human creative work, so the level of relevance of discussions concerning the ethical aspects of the use of such tools in the creative production of certain works is also increasing. Since the release of ChatGPT in open access on the Internet, it is a rapidly growing application of this tool in the increasingly automated creation of various types of texts, which until now were written by humans and now for humans can be done by artificial intelligence technology, an intelligent chatbot based on a generative language model. Advanced generative language models are taught to produce various types of texts based on artificial neural network technology, which are taught specific "skills" through a process of deep learning on the basis of data and information from many online databases, online libraries, indexing databases of scientific papers, information portals containing millions of source texts, and are refined through ongoing discussions with millions of users on the Internet. At present, such intelligent chatbots based on advanced generative language models are already being made available on the Internet by almost all leading Internet technology companies, or are currently working on developing and improving such tools and will soon make them available in open access to Internet users. Such increasingly "intelligent" tools that develop various kinds of documents, texts, studies in an increasingly sophisticated way and carry out the "creative" process in an increasingly perfect way are finding a rapidly growing scale of new applications and are being used more and more widely by Internet users. However, on the other hand, in a situation where Internet users use such tools not only for casual discussions, for fun, for entertainment, and commission intelligent chatbots to develop an article, formalized document, photo, graphic, etc. intended for publication, for use in a thesis, in an analytical report on the analysis and evaluation of the functioning of certain real-world economic entities and institutions, etc., then certain problems of an ethical nature arise. then certain ethical problems arise in connection with the use by the said intelligent chatbots from texts, documents, photos, articles and scientific and other books available on the Internet, etc., without first asking the authors of these studies, works, etc. whether they allow the use of their works, works, studies that have been published on the Internet in advance. In addition to this, ethical problems are also related to the fact that the said intelligent chatbots, in the course of automated development of works, often still do not fully show footnotes to sources, on show a full bibliography in the specified standards for the development of bibliographic descriptions of texts and source materials. Besides, also during the discussions conducted by intelligent chatbots with Internet users, it is not obligatory for the company providing the chatbot to obtain consent from the Internet user for the use of his knowledge, his documents and studies, his works, which he will enter into the database system of the intelligent chatbot, which are then used to improve the discussions conducted on the part of the chatbot, and are used to provide answers, to perform commissioned works for subsequent other Internet users. Besides, what is particularly important, in a situation when an intelligent chatbot on the order of an Internet user develops a certain work, and if it even shows sources for data, shows materials, publications, articles, books, photos, other source materials in the footnotes, in the bibliography, then at the same time a request is not sent to the authors of the source works for the possibility of their use by the chatbot in the development of a certain commissioned work by another Internet user, and no consent is taken from the authors of the original sources of data, information, results of previously conducted research, analysis, etc. Besides, in connection with the fact that many of the above-mentioned issues are not regulated by law, so there is still no mandatory requirement for authors of studies created with the involvement of tools based on a certain generative artificial intelligence technology to demonstrate that the work or a part of it, a certain fragment was created with the use of a certain mentioned tool. Accordingly, studies, texts, photos created with the use of such intelligent tools may contain information that is inconsistent with the facts and can be and are used to generate disinformation on the Internet, mainly on social media websites. Therefore, there are various dangers, risks, serious dangers associated with the unauthorized, incompatible with ethical principles, without respect for copyright, creation of certain works through the use of generative artificial intelligence. Thus, it is necessary to properly regulate all the above-mentioned issues concerning the creation of various types of works using generative artificial intelligence. In addition to this, it is necessary to legally sanction the creation of a requirement to automatically mark the works created in this way that a particular study, text, article, document, photo, film, etc. was created using a particular intelligent tool. It is also necessary to systematically organize the collection of consent from the authors of various types of source works, previously written texts, articles, books, made studies, photos, films, whose authors are human creators for the use of their works in the automated creation of further studies and works but already realized by tools based on generative artificial intelligence.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
How should ChatGPT and other intelligent chatbots be used so that it is ethical, socially responsible and does not violate copyrights? How should intelligent chatbots that are generative language models be used, so that the texts and other types of works created by tools based on generative artificial intelligence are created fairly, in accordance with the ethics of writing articles, certain documents, photos, graphics, videos, etc., and in such a way that, by the way, within the framework of this type of "creation", copyrights are not violated, so that all necessary footnotes to texts, documents, photos, etc., are reliably demonstrated. source, so that a bibliography with all properly shown sources, source materials, references to source documents is developed to the full extent, so that materials, articles, books, documents and other source studies are cited correctly and reliably?
How should ChatGPT be used so that it is ethical, socially responsible and does not violate copyrights?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research. In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
This entry started out with the question: Why are there DIFFERENT SCHOOLS of CHINESE CALLIGRAPHY? Does any calligrapher write in SIMPLIFIED CHINESE?
While Traditional Chinese characters hold a prominent place in the practice of calligraphy due to their historical roots and aesthetic richness, Simplified Chinese characters are also used by some calligraphers, particularly in settings or regions where Simplified Chinese is the norm. The beauty of Chinese calligraphy lies in the skill of the calligrapher and their ability to convey emotion and artistic expression through the strokes of the characters, regardless of the script style.
- Artistic Preference: Many calligraphers, especially those focusing on classical styles, prefer Traditional characters due to their complexity and the aesthetic depth they offer. Traditional characters allow for a greater expression of artistic skill and are deeply connected to the historical and cultural heritage of Chinese calligraphy.
- Simplified Characters in Calligraphy: While Traditional characters are more commonly associated with the art form, Simplified Chinese characters are also used in calligraphy, especially in contexts where the audience is more familiar with Simplified Chinese. There are calligraphers in mainland China who practice their art using Simplified characters, and there are artistic explorations and educational materials in calligraphy that utilize them.
- Contextual Use: The choice between Traditional and Simplified characters often depends on the audience, the calligrapher's personal preference, and the historical or cultural context of the work. For instance, calligraphic works intended for a mainland Chinese audience or for educational purposes in regions that use Simplified characters might be more likely to feature Simplified script.
But I come to realise, prompted by Karl below, the more pertinent question is how is Chinese Calligraphy a form of meditative exercise...
Chinese calligraphy is more like a physical exercise because it involves the whole body in a disciplined practice that enhances physical control, mental focus, and emotional well-being. It's a holistic activity that nourishes the mind, body, and spirit, paralleling many forms of physical exercise that aim to achieve the same balance.
Chinese calligraphy is often likened to physical exercise due to the comprehensive engagement and coordination it requires from the body and mind. This art form is not only about the visual outcome but also about the process, embodying principles that resonate with physical and mental discipline. It requires:
1. Posture and Body Alignment
- Practicing Chinese calligraphy requires proper posture and control over one's body alignment. The calligrapher must sit or stand in a way that allows for smooth, unobstructed movement of the arm and wrist. This posture is maintained over extended periods, similar to how certain physical exercises require specific stances for effectiveness and to prevent injury.
2. Hand-Eye Coordination
- Like many physical activities that require precise coordination between seeing and moving, calligraphy demands acute hand-eye coordination. The calligrapher must translate visualized strokes into physical motion with accuracy and intention.
3. Fine Motor Skills and Control
- The practice of calligraphy involves controlling brush movements with finesse to produce strokes of varying thickness, direction, and speed. This control is akin to the fine motor skill development seen in certain sports or musical instrument playing, where nuanced movements determine the quality of the performance.
4. Breath Control
- Breath control is an essential aspect of Chinese calligraphy, much as it is in many forms of physical exercise. The rhythm of one's breath can influence brush movements, helping to achieve a meditative state that aligns with the flow of the strokes. In some traditions, calligraphers are taught to coordinate their breathing with brush movements to enhance concentration and fluidity.
5. Mental Focus and Discipline
- The practice of calligraphy requires a high level of mental focus and discipline, similar to that needed in martial arts or yoga. Calligraphers often describe entering a state of mindfulness where distractions are minimized, and the mind is fully engaged in the act of writing. This mental aspect is a significant part of why calligraphy can be seen as a form of physical exercise, as it trains both the body and the mind.
6. Stamina and Endurance
- Producing a piece of calligraphy, especially on a large scale, can be physically demanding and requires stamina. The continuous practice builds endurance, both for the specific muscles involved in writing and for the calligrapher's overall concentration and ability to maintain control over longer sessions.
7. Therapeutic Effects
- Just as physical exercise is known for its health benefits, including stress reduction and improved mental health, calligraphy offers similar therapeutic effects. The concentration and calmness required can reduce stress levels and promote a sense of well-being.
I came across an interesting article published in The Lancet https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)60144-5/fulltext, which made me think about the purpose of writing. I am curious to know your opinion and to understand what other professionals in the field think.
In my opinion, we write to leave a legacy. Our thoughts and ideas are immortalized in the minds of those who read our work or use our findings to expand their own knowledge. We can measure the impact of our work based on the number of citations we receive, but it's not always an objective measure. Someone can download our work without reading it, or skim through it without really understanding it.
The speed at which scientific articles are produced, with or without the help of AI, is astounding. We produce information that we hope will be useful for others to understand the world around us. As scientists, we share our knowledge and the answers we have found, but we also acknowledge that there is still so much we don't know. We write to be read, to have our ideas challenged, and to contribute to the collective knowledge of humanity. Being cited is a validation of our work, but it's not the only measure of success.
What do you think?
Hace poco encontré este provocador artículo publicado en The Lancet https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)60144-5/fulltext, que suscitó preguntarme para qué escribir. Me gustaría conocer su opinión y entender un poco mejor qué opinan colegas del mundo.
No te conozco, pero me gustaría animarte a participar. Empiezo yo:
Considero que escribimos para no morir, es decir que existimos en la mente de quien nos lee o de quien decide citarnos o utilizar nuestras ideas y hallazgos para ir más allá de lo que llegamos nosotros.
Los indicadores se miden, quizá sea esta la razón del creciente interés por medirnos en cantidad de citas, el que nos lean parece que no puede ser medido con la misma objetividad con la que mides si fuiste o no citado, puedes descargar el texto y no leerlo, es posible, o recorrer el texto sin una detenida lectura.
En esta velocidad en la que se producen artículos científicos, con IA (inteligencia artificial) o sin ella, producimos información, aquella que queremos que otro ser humano disfrute y sea útil para comprender lo que desconoce. Pienso que resultado de la investigación como autores compartimos, el pedacito de información que tenemos sobre respuestas a preguntas constantes: no sabemos. Como científicos sabemos unos más que otros que no sabemos en realidad, y nos ubicamos así, al menos yo me ubico así, no sé, y sobre esta posibilidad de que no sé el deseo de saber es grande, por ello, escribo para ser leído, y que otros puedan discutir con lo que pude comprender de esto que estudio: la vida. Si resultado de esto, soy citado esta bien para mi. Qué opinas tú?
Need articles related to discourse connectors in EFL writing
Can anyone recommend a company or institution (write contact) that would be able to measure supercritical conditions for a liquid mixture?
email: [email protected]
A Literature Review of How ChatGPT is Perceived and Utilized in EFL Writing Classes: Implications for Vietnam
Hello everyone, i'm currently writing an academy writing and have a question about Normas APA.
There is a journal that does not have a person as an author, but an institution. This journal has contributions from different authors. I put a contribution in my work and I would like to reference that journal, but I don't know how to do it. Can you tell me how exactly I have to reference according to the APA seventh edition?
I referenced it in the following way, but my professor told me that it does not correspond. Can you tell me how to do it? Just in case, the last name of the contributor to the book is Goroshanina, N.
"Hueber Verlag in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Goethe Institut.. (1995). Fremdsprache Deutsch. Aussprache, 12, S. 58." This is how I referenced...
I always take the longest time thinking about titles and writing abstracts, so I think it might be a good use. But I wonder if journals should include this in their guidelines, or else, it's not a good practice. Ideas? Experience?
Is there any procedure to follow ?
I am willing to write and publish my work here on ResearchGate, how do I go about it.
Need your guidance.
I am new to education research. I am trying to go back and write up a project that I finished about a year ago, and realize that I only collected student responses at the end of the semester: meaning I don't have pre- and post survey data (just post). I am wondering if there is a chance to still write this paper up? Since I am new to this whole field I don't know if that is appropriate, and if I can still write it up I am not sure how to go about analyzing data. Can you provide me with some advice? It would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Am writing a manuscript I want to publish with Elservier .
My all proposal are rejected. I don't where it was problem. If any one have mathematical proposal ( mostly in mathematical fluid dynamics) which work was already done, please share with me and help me. I really need help.
