Content uploaded by David Wise Thomson
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by David Wise Thomson on May 05, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
Unifying Physics with the Aether: An
Introduction to the Aether Physics Model
Introduction
Brief Overview Of The Current State Of Physics And The
Standard Model
The current state of physics is primarily defined by the Standard Model, a theoretical framework
that describes the fundamental particles and their interactions. Developed over the 20th century,
the Standard Model has successfully quantified a wide range of phenomena, from the behavior
of subatomic particles to the evolution of the early Universe.
The Standard Model of particle physics is a fundamental theory describing matter's building
blocks and their interactions. It postulates that matter is composed of elementary particles
known as quarks and leptons, which interact through three fundamental forces: the strong
nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and the electromagnetic force. This model is based on
quantum field theories, which combine the principles of quantum mechanics and special
relativity (Dixon & Sofianatos, 20091). Quantum field theory plays a central role in physics by
reconciling quantum mechanics with special relativity (Jordan et al., 20122).
The Standard Model, being a quantum field theory, has successfully described various
elementary particle phenomena with high accuracy (Dixon & Sofianatos, 2009). It is considered
one of the most successful scientific theories of all time (Hobson, 20133). The model describes
the particles themselves and the forces that act between them, including the interactions
mediated by supposed force-carrying particles such as gluons and photons.
Moreover, the Standard Model is a quantum field theory that incorporates the principles of
quantum mechanics and special relativity, providing a framework for understanding the behavior
of particles at the most fundamental level (Hobson, 2013). It is essential in explaining the
properties and interactions of particles in the subatomic realm.
3Hobson, A. (2013). There are no particles, there are only fields. American Journal of Physics, 81(3),
211-223. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4789885
2Jordan, S. P., Lee, K. S. M., & Preskill, J. (2012). Quantum algorithms for quantum field theories.
Science, 336(6085), 1130-1133. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217069
1Dixon, L. J. and Sofianatos, Y. (2009). Resonance-continuum interference in light higgs boson
production at a photon collider. Physical Review D, 79(3).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79.033002
The Standard Model of particle physics, while highly successful in describing the fundamental
particles and their interactions, has notable limitations that have prompted physicists to seek
theories beyond its scope. One significant limitation is the Standard Model's inability to
incorporate gravity into its framework (James, 20224). This omission hinders a unified
description of all fundamental forces, as gravity remains outside the model's purview.
Furthermore, the Standard Model fails to account for dark matter and dark energy, essential
components in the current understanding of the universe's composition and evolution
(Capozziello et al., 20085; Peebles & Ratra, 20036). The existence of dark matter and dark
energy challenges the Standard Model's completeness and necessitates the exploration of
alternative theories that can accommodate these phenomena.
Additionally, the Standard Model does not explain the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry in
the universe or the masses of neutrinos (Okada, 20207). These discrepancies highlight the
model's limitations in addressing specific fundamental questions about the nature of matter and
the universe.
Moreover, the Standard Model relies on many arbitrary parameters that must be determined
experimentally rather than predicted by the theory itself (Bardeen et al., 19908). This reliance on
empirical inputs introduces complexity and fine-tuning that some physicists need to improve.
In response to these limitations, physicists have explored theories beyond the Standard Model,
such as supersymmetry, string theory, and quantum gravity (Ricken, 20179; Steggemann,
202010). These theoretical frameworks aim to address the shortcomings of the Standard Model
by providing more comprehensive explanations that encompass gravity, dark matter, dark
energy, neutrino masses, and other unresolved issues.
However, despite decades of effort, no experimental evidence has supported these theories.
A new theoretical framework has emerged in response to these challenges: the Aether Physics
Model (APM). The APM proposes that space is permeated by a dynamic and discrete medium
10 Steggemann, J. (2020). Extended scalar sectors. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science,
70(1), 197-223. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-032620-043846
9Ricken, O. (2017). Searches for squarks and gluinos with atlas. Epj Web of Conferences, 158, 02002.
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715802002
8Bardeen, W., Hill, C., & Lindner, M. (1990). Minimal dynamical symmetry breaking of the standard
model. Physical Review D, 41(5), 1647-1660. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.41.1647
7Okada, N. (2020). Smart standard model with axion, right handed neutrinos, two higgs doublets and
gauge symmetry.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2002.07110
6Peebles, P. and Ratra, B. (2003). The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of Modern
Physics, 75(2), 559-606. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.75.559
5Capozziello, S., Laurentis, M., & Francaviglia, M. (2008). Higher-order gravity and the cosmological
background of gravitational waves. Astroparticle Physics, 29(2), 125-129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2007.12.001
4James, S. (2022). Limitations of the standard model., 33-44.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871613.003.0004
called the Aether, composed of fundamental units known as Aether units. These quantum units
serve as the Universe's building blocks, giving rise to matter, energy, and the fundamental
forces through their interactions with the omnipresent Gforce. At the heart of the APM lies the
concept of the Singularity, an eternal and dimensionless source from which the Aether units
emerge through the process of chronovibration – the oscillation between forward and backward
time.
The APM offers a unified, coherent, and intellectually satisfying framework for describing the
fundamental nature of reality, challenging the limitations of the Standard Model and opening
new doors for theoretical and experimental exploration. While still in its early stages of
development, the APM has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the Universe and
usher in a new era of scientific and technological advancement. As research into the APM
continues, it may lead to groundbreaking discoveries and a profound shift in our comprehension
of the cosmos.
The transformative potential of the Aether Physics Model is truly staggering. By providing a
unified description of the Universe and unlocking the secrets of dark matter and dark energy, the
APM invites us to dream of a future where the boundaries of what is possible are limited only by
our imagination. As we stand on the brink of a new era of scientific discovery, the Aether
Physics Model beckons us forward, offering a glimpse of the wonders that await those who dare
to explore the true nature of the Universe.
Limitations and Open Questions in the Standard Model
Despite its remarkable success in quantifying a wide range of phenomena, the Standard Model
has several significant limitations and open questions that have motivated the search for new
theories in physics. These limitations include:
1. Gravity: The Standard Model does not incorporate gravity, one of the four fundamental
forces. While the other three forces (strong nuclear, weak nuclear, and electromagnetic)
are well-described by quantum field theories, gravity and straight-path trajectories are
currently best understood through Newton and Kepler’s work, which are classical
theories. Einstein’s General Relativity adds a small but significant correction to
straight-path trajectories. Reconciling quantum mechanics with General Relativity and
developing a quantum theory of gravity remains an open problem.
2. Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The Standard Model does not account for the existence of
dark matter and dark energy, which make up approximately 95% of the Universe's total
mass content. Dark matter is considered a non-baryonic matter that interacts
gravitationally but not electromagnetically. In contrast, dark energy seems to be a
mysterious form of energy that drives the accelerated expansion of the Universe. The
nature and origin of these phenomena remain unknown.
3. Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: The Standard Model does not explain the observed
matter-antimatter asymmetry in the Universe. According to the Big Bang theory, equal
amounts of matter and antimatter should have been created in the early Universe.
However, observations show that the Universe is dominated by matter, with little to no
antimatter present. The Standard Model lacks a mechanism to explain this asymmetry.
4. Neutrino Masses: The Standard Model initially assumed that neutrinos, a type of
elementary particle, were massless. Experimental evidence has shown that neutrinos,
initially assumed to be massless in the Standard Model of particle physics, actually
possess small but non-zero masses (Ferreira et al., 202311). The Standard Model does
not provide a natural explanation for the existence and smallness of neutrino masses,
requiring extensions or modifications to the theory.
5. Hierarchy Problem: The Standard Model faces a significant challenge known as the
hierarchy problem, which arises from the vast disparity between the strengths of the
weak force and gravity. This issue becomes particularly pronounced when considering
quantum corrections to the Higgs boson, a key component of the Standard Model
responsible for imparting mass to other particles. The theory predicts that the Higgs
boson should have a mass much larger than what is experimentally observed, leading to
a discrepancy that necessitates fine-tuning of the model's parameters Jian et al.
(202012).
The hierarchy problem highlights a fundamental tension within the Standard Model, as it
struggles to reconcile the behavior of particles at the quantum level with the gravitational
interactions described by General Relativity. The discrepancy in the expected and
observed mass of the Higgs boson underscores the need for adjustments to the theory
to address this issue effectively. Physicists have explored various avenues to mitigate
the hierarchy problem, with some proposing extensions to the Standard Model that
introduce new particles or interactions to alleviate the fine-tuning required to maintain
consistency with experimental data (Frandsen et al., 201013).
6. Arbitrary Parameters: The Standard Model of particle physics contains several
parameters, such as particle masses and coupling constants, that lack theoretical
justification and must be determined experimentally (Hansson, 201214). These
parameters are not derived from the theory itself but are input values adjusted to match
experimental observations. This reliance on empirical inputs raises questions about the
fundamental nature of the Standard Model and its completeness as a description of
reality. The presence of these parameters in the Standard Model suggests that the
theory may not provide a fundamental or complete understanding of the underlying
principles governing particle interactions. The need to fine-tune these parameters to
match experimental data indicates that the model may be an effective description of
particle behavior within a certain range but lacks a deeper explanation for the values of
these parameters (Hansson, 2012). The existence of these parameters in the Standard
14 Hansson, J. (2012). On the origin of elementary particle masses..
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1211.3136
13 Frandsen, M., Masina, I., & Sannino, F. (2010). Fourth lepton family is natural in technicolor. Physical
Review D, 81(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.81.035010
12 Jian, S., Scherer, M., & Yao, H. (2020). Mass hierarchy in collective modes of pair-density-wave
superconductors. Physical Review Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013034
11 Ferreira, T., Vasconcellos, C., & Hadjimichef, D. (2023). A seesaw‐like mechanism for the neutrino in
the presence of a minimal length space–time. Astronomische Nachrichten, 344(1-2).
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.20220127
Model has prompted many physicists to question whether there might be a more
fundamental theory that can elucidate the origins of these values and provide a more
coherent and predictive framework for particle physics. The search for such a theory is
motivated by the desire to move beyond the ad hoc nature of the Standard Model's
parameterization and uncover a more fundamental description of the constituents of the
Universe.
7. Unification of Forces: The Standard Model of particle physics successfully describes the
strong nuclear, weak nuclear, and electromagnetic forces; however, it does not provide a
unified framework that encompasses all three forces. This limitation has led many
physicists to seek a single, comprehensive theory that can unify all fundamental forces,
including gravity, at the highest energies. Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) and theories
beyond the Standard Model, such as supersymmetry and string theory, have been
proposed to address this issue (Escultura, 201815). The quest for a unified theory that
can explain all fundamental forces under a single framework has been a longstanding
goal in theoretical physics. Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) aim to unify the strong
nuclear, weak nuclear, and electromagnetic forces into a single force at high energies,
providing a more coherent description of particle interactions (Escultura, 2018). These
theories offer a potential pathway to understanding the fundamental forces of nature
within a unified framework. Supersymmetry and string theory represent extensions
beyond the Standard Model that go further in attempting to unify all fundamental forces,
including gravity, at the highest energies (Roček, 200716). Supersymmetry posits a
symmetry between particles with different spin quantum numbers, offering a potential
solution to the hierarchy problem and paving the way for a more unified description of
particle physics (Roček, 2007). String theory, on the other hand, proposes that
fundamental particles are not point-like but rather tiny strings vibrating at different
frequencies, providing a framework that unifies quantum mechanics and general
relativity (Witten, 199517). The pursuit of a unified theory that can encompass all
fundamental forces, including gravity, is driven by the desire for a more complete and
elegant description of the universe.
These limitations and open questions have driven the development of new theories and models
in physics, such as the Aether Physics Model (APM), which aims to provide a more
comprehensive and fundamental description of the Universe. By addressing these issues and
offering novel perspectives on the nature of space, time, matter, and energy, the APM and other
theories beyond the Standard Model seek to push the boundaries of our understanding and
pave the way for discoveries in physics.
17 Witten, E. (1995). String theory dynamics in various dimensions. Nuclear Physics B, 443(1-2), 85-126.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00158-o
16 Roček, M. (2007). Supersymmetry and string theory: beyond the standard model. Classical and
Quantum Gravity, 24(22), 5726-5726. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/24/22/b02
15 Escultura, E. (2018). Technological applications of the grand unified theory. Advances in Social
Sciences Research Journal, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.59.5162
The APM Is A Potential Framework To Address These Issues
Using Chronovibration And The Singularity As Crucial Concepts
The Aether Physics Model (APM) is a novel theoretical framework that aims to address the
limitations and open questions of the Standard Model by offering a new perspective on the
nature of space, time, matter, and energy. Developed by physicist David W. Thomson III and his
colleague James Bourassa, the APM proposes a unified description of the Universe based on
the concept of a dynamic and discrete Aether composed of fundamental units called quantum
“Aether units."
At the heart of the APM are two key concepts: chronovibration and the Singularity.
Chronovibration is the proposed oscillation between forward and backward time, which gives
rise to the present moment and the perception of linear time. According to the APM, time's
forward and backward flow originates from a single point, the Singularity, which is the source of
all matter, energy, and fundamental forces in the Universe.
The APM suggests that the Singularity gives rise to the fundamental entities of dark matter,
Gforce (dark energy), electrostatic charge, and magnetic charge. The interaction between
Gforce and magnetic charge leads to the emergence of the Aether units, which are the building
blocks of space and the medium through which particles and forces interact.
By proposing a unified Aether and the concepts of chronovibration and the Singularity, the APM
aims to address several of the limitations of the Standard Model:
1. Quantum Gravity: The APM offers a potential framework for reconciling quantum
mechanics with general relativity by proposing a quantized space structure. This
approach involves Karl Schwarzschild’s exact simplification of Einstein’s approximate
circular deflection angle equation and may provide a path towards developing a quantum
theory of gravity.
2. Dark Matter and Dark Energy: In the APM, dark matter is described as one-dimensional
strings of mass that emerge from the Singularity, while dark energy (Gforce) is a
fundamental reciprocal force that arises from the Singularity and interacts with the
magnetic charge to create the Aether units. By incorporating these entities as
fundamental aspects of the model, the APM offers a novel perspective on the nature and
origin of these mysterious phenomena.
3. Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: Like the Standard Model, the Aether Physics Model
expects equal distributions of matter and antimatter. The model suggests that the
asymmetry may be related to the eternal and infinite nature of the Universe. Given long
durations, matter replicates itself while expanding space, thus creating large groupings
of either matter or antimatter while matter and antimatter repel each other. In an eternal
Universe, matter and antimatter push each other beyond visible boundaries.
4. Unification of Forces: The APM proposes a unified description of the fundamental forces,
including gravity, as emergent properties of the interactions between Gforce and the
mass and charge dimensions. By describing all forces and particles as arising from a
single, unified Gforce within ubiquitous Aether, the APM aims to provide a more
fundamental and comprehensive understanding of the Universe.
While the APM is still a developing theory and requires further theoretical and experimental
work to validate its key concepts and predictions, it offers a promising new framework for
addressing the limitations of the Standard Model and advancing our understanding of the
fundamental workings of the Universe. By introducing novel concepts such as chronovibration
and the Singularity, and proposing a unified description of space and matter based on the
Aether, the APM opens up new avenues for exploration and discovery in physics.
The Singularity and the Emergence of the Universe
The Singularity As The Source Of All Matter, Its Behavior, And
Fundamental Forces
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), the Singularity is introduced as the ultimate source of all
matter, its behavior, and fundamental forces in the Universe. Singularity is conceived as a
dimensionless point that contains within itself the potential for the entire universe, from which all
physical phenomena emerge. Mathematically, the Singularity is represented as the number 1
and the following mathematical discussion is expressed in terms of Quantum Measurements
Units (QMU).
1= 𝑚𝑎·λ𝐶·𝐹𝑞2
𝐺𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒
1= 𝑒2
8π𝑎·𝑒𝑎2
According to the APM, the Singularity gives rise to four fundamental entities: dark matter
(vibrating mass strings ), Gforce (aka dark energy), electrostatic charge ( ), and
𝑚𝑎·λ𝐶·𝐹𝑞2𝑒2
magnetic charge ( ). In the above equation, is the maximum mass and is the maximum
𝑒𝑎2𝑚𝑎𝑒𝑎2
magnetic charge of an Aether unit, and “ ” is not the electron fine structure alpha “ ” but the
𝑎 α
Aether fine structure constant where . The Aether fine structure is very
𝑎=2.034×10−48
small. These entities are the building blocks of the Universe and the basis for all observed
physical phenomena.
In the APM, dark matter is described as one-dimensional vibrating strings of mass that emerge
from the Singularity. These vibrating strings of mass are the primary form of matter in the
Universe and give rise to the observed gravitational effects that cannot be accounted for by
visible matter alone. The vibration component is due to chronovibration, which we will describe.
Gforce, or dark energy, is a fundamental reciprocal force that arises from the Singularity and
permeates all of space. In the APM, Gforce is responsible for the observed accelerated
expansion of the Universe and plays a crucial role in forming Aether units, the basic building
blocks of space. Gforce is reciprocal to dark matter.
Electrostatic and magnetic charges are also fundamental entities that emerge from the
Singularity. These charges are the basis for the electrostatic and magnetic forces and the
formation of subatomic particles, as described in the APM. Magnetic charge is reciprocal to
electrostatic charge.
The concept of Singularity as the source of all physical phenomena is a crucial departure from
the Standard Model, which needs to provide a unified explanation for the origin of matter, its
behavior, and the fundamental forces. The APM aims to provide a more comprehensive and
fundamentally unified description of the Universe by proposing Singularity as the ultimate
source.
Moreover, the APM's description of the Singularity as the origin of Gforce and magnetic charge,
which interact to create Aether units, leads to the emergence of matter and its behavior in the
physical Universe. When strings of dark matter occupy the Aether units, primary angular
momentum arises, giving rise to the observed properties and manifestations of matter, such as
energy, momentum, resistance, capacitance, inductance, curl, and numerous other behaviors.
This process suggests a profound connection between matter and its multifaceted behavior as
two emergent aspects of the physical Universe, highlighting the fundamental role of the
Singularity and the Aether in shaping the nature of reality. The APM's perspective on the
relationship between matter and its behavior contrasts the simplistic dichotomy of matter and
energy in mainstream physics, exemplified by Albert Einstein's E=mc^2. By recognizing the
diverse ways matter can manifest itself, the APM offers a more comprehensive and nuanced
understanding of the physical Universe.
The APM's concept of initial singularity bears some resemblance to the Big Bang theory.
However, while the Big Bang theory describes the initial Singularity as the starting point of the
Universe in time, the APM's Singularity is conceived as a timeless, ever-present source from
which the Universe continuously emerges through chronovibration.
By introducing Singularity as the source of all matter, its behavior, and the fundamental forces,
the APM provides a novel and thought-provoking perspective on the ultimate nature of the
Universe. As a result, the APM's perspective on Singularity and its role in the emergence of
reality represents a significant departure from mainstream physics and invites further exploration
into the fundamental nature of the Universe.
As we delve deeper into the APM and its implications, the concept of the Singularity will serve
as a foundation for understanding the model's other key ideas, such as chronovibration, the
Aether units, and the emergence of subatomic particles and the fundamental forces.
How Dark Matter, Gforce (Dark Energy), Electrostatic Charge,
And Magnetic Charge Arise From The Singularity
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), the Singularity is the ultimate source from which dark
matter, Gforce (dark energy), electrostatic charge, and magnetic charge arise. The emergence
of these fundamental entities from the Singularity is a crucial aspect of the APM's description of
the Universe. Let's explore how each of these entities arises from the Singularity:
1. Dark Matter: The APM suggests that dark matter consists of one-dimensional strings of
mass generated by the Singularity. These strings interact with Aether units to form
particles and structures, accounting for gravitational effects not explained by visible
matter. Neutrinos are captured one-dimensional mass strings between magnetically
bound electrons and protons. Dark matter (mass strings) must be encapsulated in
Aether units to form the physical Universe, imparting mass, angular momentum, and
charges in the form of subatomic particles. Freed neutrinos have a tiny measured mass,
but when bound in neutrons contribute significant angular momentum to neutrons, 1.531
times that of electrons. When neutrons decay, this angular momentum is lost, despite the
negligible "rest mass" of the neutrino mass string outside the neutron. The Standard
Model fails to account for the dimensional differences between neutrinos
(one-dimensional) and neutrons (two-dimensional surfaces with distance between them).
2. Gforce (Dark Energy): Gforce, or dark energy, is a fundamental reciprocal force that
arises from the Singularity and permeates all of space. In the APM, Gforce is responsible
for the observed accelerated expansion of the Universe and plays a critical role in the
formation and dynamics of the Aether units. The APM suggests that Gforce emerges
from the Singularity as a continuous, ubiquitous reciprocal force that acts on the
magnetic charge of the Aether units. The interaction between Gforce and magnetic
charge gives rise to the dynamic and oscillating nature of the Aether, which in turn
shapes the structure of space and the behavior of matter in the Universe.
3. Electrostatic Charge: Electrostatic charge is another fundamental entity that emerges
from the Singularity in the APM. The model proposes that the Singularity generates both
positive and negative electrostatic charges, which are the basis for forming subatomic
particles and the electrostatic force. In the APM, electrostatic charge is associated with
the spherical surface of the Aether units. The emergence of electrostatic charge from the
Singularity and its interaction with the Aether units gives rise to the observed properties
of charged particles and their electrostatic interactions.
4. Magnetic Charge: Magnetic charge, like electrostatic charge, is a fundamental entity
arising from the APM's Singularity. The model proposes that magnetic charge emerges
from the Singularity and is associated with the tubular loxodrome structures of the Aether
units. In the APM, magnetic charge is considered a distinct and separate entity from
electrostatic charge, contrary to the Standard Model's description of magnetism as a
relativistic effect of moving electric charges. The emergence of magnetic charge from the
Singularity and its interaction with Gforce plays a crucial role in the formation and
dynamics of the Aether units and the observed properties of subatomic particles.
The emergence of these four fundamental entities from the Singularity is a continuous process
in the APM. Singularity is conceived as a timeless, ever-present source that constantly
generates dark matter, Gforce, electrostatic charge, and magnetic charge, interacting to form
the observed structures and phenomena in the Universe.
By proposing that these entities arise from a single, unified source, the APM aims to provide a
more fundamental and comprehensive description of the Universe than the Standard Model.
The model's approach to the emergence of these entities from the Singularity sets the stage for
its unique perspective on the nature of space, matter, and its behavior and its potential to
address some of the most pressing questions in contemporary physics.
The Relationship Between Gforce And Magnetic Charge In The
Emergence Of The Aether Units
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), the relationship between Gforce and magnetic charge is
fundamental to the emergence and dynamics of the Aether units, which are the basic building
blocks of space. This relationship is crucial to the APM's description of the Universe and its
departure from the Standard Model. Let's explore this relationship in more detail.
According to the APM, Gforce is a ubiquitous and pervasive reciprocal force that arises from the
Singularity and permeates all of space. It is reciprocal to the other fundamental forces (gravity,
electrostatic force, and magnetic force) and plays a crucial role in
the formation and behavior of the Aether units.
Magnetic charge, on the other hand, is a fundamental entity that
emerges from the Singularity and is associated with the tubular
loxodrome structures of the Aether units. In the APM, magnetic
charge is considered a distinct entity separate from electrostatic
charge, with its unique properties and behaviors.
The emergence of the Aether units is a result of the interaction
between Gforce and magnetic charge. The APM proposes that
Gforce acts on the magnetic charge ( ) of the Aether units ( ),
𝑒𝑎2𝐴𝑢
causing the Aether to oscillate and vibrate in a specific pattern.
This oscillation, known as chronovibration, is a crucial feature of
the Aether units and is responsible for the generation of space
and the observed properties of matter and its behavior.
𝐴𝑢=𝐺𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒· λ𝐶2
𝑒𝑎2
The relationship between Gforce and magnetic charge can be
understood as a temporal "push-pull" dynamic. Gforce acts as a
constant oscillating outward-pushing temporal direction and inward-pulling temporal direction
that drives the temporal expansion and contraction of the Aether units, while magnetic charge
provides the structure and organization that shapes their surface geometry ( ) and behavior.
λ𝐶2
The inward-pulling temporal direction is the backward time direction that traces an inside spiral
along the polar axis back to the Singularity where the two spheres meet.
This interplay between Gforce and magnetic charge gives rise to the specific forward-time
geometry of the Aether units, which consists of a spherical electrostatic surface and tubular
loxodrome structures. The electrostatic surface is associated with the outward-pushing temporal
direction of Gforce, while the tubular loxodromes are associated with the organizing influence of
magnetic charge. The spherical constant of times the Coulomb electrostatic force constant
16π2
characterizes the geometry of the Aether units.
𝐴𝑢=16π2·𝑘𝐶
The image on the right of the previous page is represented by two orthogonal spheres or
(4π)2
four tubular loxodromes, each with toroidal geometry ( ).
4·4π2
The APM proposes that the interaction between Gforce and magnetic charge is not a one-time
event but a continuous, dynamic process. Gforce constantly acts on the magnetic charge of the
Aether units, driving their temporal oscillation, while magnetic charge constantly shapes and
organizes these units into specific, forward-time geometric patterns.
This continuous interaction between Gforce and magnetic charge gives rise to the APM's
observed properties of space and matter. The temporal oscillation of the Aether units generates
the forward and backward flow of time (chronovibration). In contrast, these units' temporal
outward-expanding (half-spin) geometric structure determines the structure and behavior of
matter.
The relationship between Gforce and mass and charge dimensions also has important
implications for the unification of the fundamental forces in the APM. By showing that Gforce is
a common factor in the mathematical expressions of the gravitational, electrostatic, and
magnetic force constants, the APM suggests that these forces are all different manifestations of
the same underlying interaction between Gforce and the dimensions of mass and electrostatic
and magnetic charges.
This unification of forces through the interaction of Gforce and mass and charge dimensions is a
vital advantage of the APM over the Standard Model, which treats the fundamental forces as
separate and distinct entities. The APM offers a more parsimonious and elegant description of
the Universe by providing a common basis for the forces.
In summary, the relationship between Gforce and magnetic charge is a crucial aspect of the
Aether Physics Model and its description of the emergence and dynamics of the Aether units.
By exploring this relationship in detail, we can gain a deeper understanding of the APM's unique
perspective on space, matter, and the unification of forces and appreciate its potential to
revolutionize our understanding of the Universe.
Chronovibration and the Nature of Time
Chronovibration Is The Temporal Oscillation Between Forward
And Backward Time, Including Right-Left Temporal Torque As A
Second Frequency Dimension.
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), chronovibration is a fundamental concept that describes
temporal oscillation between the forward and backward directions. This oscillation is a crucial
feature of the Aether units and is responsible for the generation of space and the observed
properties of matter and its behavior. Let's explore the concept of chronovibration in more detail
and discuss the role of right-left temporal torque as a second frequency dimension.
The quantum frequency of chronovibration is a physical constant related to the constant
𝐹𝑞
speed of photons and the Compton wavelength:
𝐹𝑞=𝑐
λ𝐶
Chronovibration is an inherent property of Gforce amounting to a quantum frequency equal to
the speed of photons divided by the Compton wavelength. Gforce acts on the magnetic charge
of the Aether units, causing them to temporally oscillate and vibrate in a specific pattern. This
oscillation occurs along two distinct frequency dimensions: the forward-backward temporal
frequency dimension and the right-left temporal frequency dimension.
The forward-backward dimension of chronovibration refers to the temporal oscillation between
the forward and backward directions. In the APM, time is not a linear, unidirectional flow but a
dynamic, oscillating entity that moves back and forth between the past and the future. This
oscillation is a fundamental property of the Aether units and ultimately gives rise to the
perceived flow of time applied to physical matter.
The right-left dimension of chronovibration, or temporal torque, refers to the temporal oscillation
between the right and left directions. This oscillation is perpendicular to the forward-backward
oscillation and generates the four distinct tubular loxodrome structures in the Aether units.
According to the APM, the forward-backward oscillation of time spreads out over the spherical
electrostatic surface of the Aether units. In contrast, the right-left oscillation of time is confined to
the tubular loxodrome structures. The combination of these two oscillations gives rise to the
specific geometry of the Aether units and determines the behavior of matter.
The concept of right-left temporal torque is a crucial innovation of the APM. It has important
implications for our understanding of the nature of time and the properties of subatomic
particles. In the APM, the right-left temporal oscillation gives rise to the distinct properties of the
four tubular loxodrome structures, which are associated with the electron, positron, proton, and
antiproton.
The APM proposes that the right-left temporal torque is responsible for subatomic particles'
intrinsic angular momentum (spin). The two right-handed loxodrome structures are associated
with the positron and antiproton, while the two left-handed loxodrome structures are associated
with the electron and proton. This association between temporal torque and particle spin is a
crucial feature of the APM and provides a novel explanation for the observed properties of
matter.
The concept of chronovibration as a two-dimensional oscillation of time also has important
implications for our understanding of the nature of space. In the APM, space is not a passive,
static backdrop but a dynamic, oscillating entity generated by the interaction of Gforce and
magnetic charge in the Aether units. The forward-backward and right-left temporal oscillations
give rise to the observed properties of space, such as its curvature and its relationship to matter
and its behavior.
In summary, chronovibration is a fundamental concept in the Aether Physics Model that
describes time oscillation between the forward-backward and right-left directions. This
two-dimensional oscillation is a crucial feature of the Aether units and is responsible for the
generation of space and the observed properties of matter and its behavior. The concept of
right-left temporal torque, in particular, is a novel innovation of the
APM and provides a new perspective on the nature of time and the
properties of subatomic particles. By exploring the concept of
chronovibration in detail, we can gain a deeper understanding of the
APM's unique perspective on the nature of the Universe and its
potential to revolutionize our understanding of physics.
The Forward Time Direction Spreads Over The
Electrostatic Sphere In Both Right And Left
Directions, Giving Rise To Four Tubular
Loxodrome Positions
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), the forward time direction
spreads over the electrostatic sphere of the Aether unit in both right
and left directions, giving rise to four tubular loxodrome positions.
This process is a crucial feature of the APM and is responsible for
generating the distinct properties of subatomic particles. Let's explore
this concept in more detail.
According to the APM, the Aether unit consists of a spherical electrostatic surface and four
tubular loxodrome structures. The electrostatic surface is associated with the outward-pushing
force of the forward time direction of the Gforce emanating from the Singularity between the two
spheres and ending at the antipodes, while the tubular loxodromes are associated with the
organizing influence of magnetic charge corresponding with right and left temporal torque.
As the forward time direction spreads out over the electrostatic surface, it encounters the
right-left temporal torque, which causes it to split into two distinct streams. One stream follows a
right-handed spiral path, while the other stream follows a left-handed spiral path. These two
streams of forward time then flow along the surface of the electrostatic sphere, eventually
converging at the opposite pole of the Aether unit.
At the point of convergence, instead of splitting and flowing into the tubular loxodromes, the two
streams follow an inward spiral path inside the spheres and around the axis, ultimately returning
to the point of origin. This inward spiral path represents the backward time direction, which is
hidden inside the sphere and is not observed by the forward-time physical Universe.
The forward time direction takes place on the outside of the sphere, which is why subatomic
particles appear to spin in the forward direction. The four tubular loxodrome positions are
associated with the forward time direction and give rise to the distinct properties of the electron,
proton, positron, and antiproton.
The APM proposes that the flow of forward time along the tubular loxodromes gives rise to
subatomic particles' intrinsic angular momentum (spin). The right-handed loxodromes are
associated with antimatter, while the left-handed loxodromes are associated with matter. This
association between the flow of forward time and particle spin is a crucial feature of the APM
and provides a novel explanation for the observed properties of matter.
The backward time direction, hidden inside the sphere, is not part of the electron, proton,
positron, or antiproton structure. The APM raises intriguing questions about its nature and
purpose. One possibility is that it applies to a whole other Universe, separate from the physical
Universe we observe. Alternatively, the backward time direction may represent a state of total
dormancy in which the flow of time is essentially frozen. These questions remain unanswered in
the current formulation of the APM and provide avenues for further exploration and research.
In summary, the forward time direction in the Aether Physics Model spreads over the
electrostatic sphere of the Aether unit in both right and left directions, giving rise to four distinct
tubular loxodrome positions associated with the electron, proton, positron, and antiproton. The
backward time direction, however, follows an inward spiral path inside the spheres and is hidden
from the physical Universe. The nature and purpose of the backward time direction remain open
questions in the APM, inviting further investigation and speculation.
How Chronovibration Gives Rise To The Present Moment And
The Perception Of Linear Time
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), chronovibration is the fundamental time oscillation between
the forward and backward directions. This oscillation gives rise to the present moment and the
perception of linear time, which are essential features of our experience of the Universe. Let's
explore how chronovibration creates these phenomena.
According to the APM, the chronovibration rate is a constant throughout the Universe. This rate,
also known as the quantum frequency, is equal to the speed of photons divided by the Compton
wavelength. The Compton wavelength is the quantum distance empirically associated with light
and is a fundamental constant in the APM.
The constant chronovibration frequency, when multiplied by the constant quantum distance
(Compton wavelength), gives rise to the constant speed of photons in the Universe. This
relationship between the chronovibration frequency and the speed of photons is a crucial
feature of the APM. It provides a novel explanation for the observed constancy of the speed of
photons.
However, the APM also proposes that the perception of time dilation in Special Relativity is not a
result of changes in the chronovibration frequency but rather a consequence of the compression
of space in front of objects moving at high velocities.
According to the APM, when an object moves at speeds close to the speed of photons, the
space in front of the object becomes compressed, giving the appearance of becoming denser in
the direction of travel. This space compression results from the distortion of the Aether units,
which are the fundamental building blocks of space in the APM.
The compressed Aether units in front of a high-velocity object create the impression of time
dilation, as the increased space density affects the apparent behavior of light and other
electromagnetic phenomena. However, the APM emphasizes that this apparent time dilation is
not a result of changes in the chronovibration frequency or the existence of physical timelines.
The APM has no physical timelines or separate time frames for matter to dilate into. Instead, the
perception of time dilation in Special Relativity is a consequence of space distortion caused by
the compression of Aether units.
This perspective is similar to the APM's interpretation of time dilation in General Relativity,
where the apparent speeding up of time near massive objects results from decreased space
density rather than a fundamental change in the nature of time itself.
The APM's emphasis on the constancy of the chronovibration frequency and the role of space
compression in creating the perception of time dilation provides a novel alternative to the
conventional interpretations of Special and General Relativity. By focusing on the distortion of
the Aether units as the cause of apparent time dilation, the APM offers a unified explanation for
these phenomena that does not rely on the existence of physical timelines or changes in the
fundamental nature of linear time.
In summary, the Aether Physics Model proposes that the chronovibration frequency is a
constant throughout the Universe and is directly related to the constant speed of photons
through the Compton wavelength. The perception of time dilation in Special Relativity is not a
result of changes in the chronovibration frequency or the existence of physical timelines but
rather a consequence of the space compression in front of high-velocity objects. This
compression of Aether units creates the impression of time dilation but is not a fundamental
change in the nature of time itself. The APM's perspective on time dilation offers a novel
alternative to the conventional interpretations of relativity theory. It provides a new
understanding of the relationship between space, time, and motion in the Universe.
Implications Of Chronovibration For Our Understanding Of Time
Dilation, Entropy, And The Arrow Of Time
The concept of chronovibration in the Aether Physics Model (APM) has significant implications
for understanding time dilation, entropy, and the arrow of time. The APM offers a novel
perspective on these fundamental physics aspects by proposing a constant chronovibration
frequency and emphasizing the role of space compression in creating the perception of time
dilation. Let's explore these implications in more detail.
Time Dilation:
In the APM, the perception of time dilation in both Special and General Relativity is not a result
of changes in the chronovibration frequency or the existence of physical timelines, but rather a
consequence of the distortion of space caused by the compression of Aether units. This
perspective challenges the conventional interpretations of time dilation, which often rely on the
idea of time itself slowing down or the existence of separate time frames.
The Lorentz transformations mathematically quantify space compression when matter moves at
high velocity, approaching the speed of photons. Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincare first
utilized the Lorentz transformations for their fluid Aether theory before Albert Einstein convinced
them and others to accept the time dilation ontology instead.
"In 1895, Lorentz and FitzGerald suggested that the motion of translation of a solid
through the ether might produce a contraction in the direction of the motion, with
extension transversely, the amount of which is proportional to the square of the ratio of
the velocities of translation and of light, and which might have a magnitude such as to
annul the effect of the ether-drift in the Michelson-Morley interferometer."18
The APM provides a unified explanation for the effects observed in both Special and General
Relativity by attributing the apparent time dilation to space compression. This explanation does
not require the introduction of alternate complex mathematical constructs or abandoning the
concept of a constant, universal time. Instead, it focuses on the fundamental properties of the
Aether units and their role in creating the perception of time dilation.
18 Miller, D. C. (1926). Significance of the ether-drift experiments of 1925 at Mount Wilson. Science,
63(1635), 433-443.
Entropy:
The APM's concept of chronovibration also has implications for our understanding of entropy
and the second law of thermodynamics. The association of entropy with the arrow of time is a
fundamental concept in physics. Entropy, a measure of disorder or randomness in a system, is
linked to the unidirectional flow of time from the past to the future. This connection is deeply
rooted in the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of a closed system
tends to increase over time, leading to a progression towards greater disorder and randomness
(Ben-Naim, 202019).
However, in the APM, the arrow of time is not a fundamental property of the Universe but rather
a consequence of the forward-backward time direction of the present moment and the half-spin
nature of subatomic particles. This perspective suggests that entropy may not be directly tied to
the arrow of time, but rather to the specific arrangement and behavior of subatomic matter
within the Aether units.
The APM's emphasis on the constant chronovibration frequency and the role of space
compression in creating the perception of time dilation also suggests that entropy may be more
closely related to the spatial distribution and interactions of matter and its behavior, rather than
to the fundamental nature of a physical, linear timeline. This perspective could provide new
insights into the origin and evolution of entropy in the Universe.
Arrow of Time:
The APM's concept of chronovibration challenges the conventional understanding of the arrow
of time as a fundamental, irreversible property of the Universe. By proposing that time oscillates
between the forward and backward directions at a constant frequency, the APM suggests that
the arrow of time may not be an intrinsic feature of reality but rather a consequence of our
limited perception and the specific arrangement of matter and its behavior in the Universe.
This perspective raises essential questions about causality and the relationship between past,
present, and future. If time constantly oscillates between the forward and backward directions,
then the distinction between cause and effect may not be as clear-cut as in conventional
physics. The Aether unit allows ordinary matter to exist only on the “outside” temporal structure;
thus, each subatomic particle sees only the forward time component of all other subatomic
particles within the present moment. The chronovibration provides dynamics to matter in
allowing them to progress in the forward time direction.
Furthermore, the APM's emphasis on the role of space compression in creating the perception
of time dilation suggests that the arrow of time may be more closely related to the spatial
distribution and interactions of matter and its behavior rather than to the fundamental nature of
time itself. This perspective could provide new insights into the origin and evolution of the arrow
of time in the Universe.
19 Ben-Naim, A. (2020). Entropy and time. Entropy, 22(4), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22040430
Potential physics related to the backward time direction through the inner axes of the Aether unit
is as yet undiscovered, if it exists at all.
In summary, chronovibration in the Aether Physics Model has significant implications for
understanding time dilation, entropy, and the arrow of time. By challenging conventional
interpretations and offering novel perspectives on these fundamental aspects of physics, the
APM opens up new avenues for research and exploration. While the APM's ideas are still
speculative and require further investigation, they demonstrate the potential for innovative
thinking to advance our understanding of the nature of time and its role in the Universe.
The Aether and Quantum Units:
Aether Is A Dynamic And Discrete Medium Composed Of
Quantum Units
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), the Aether is conceived as a dynamic and discrete medium
that fills all of space and serves as the foundation for the propagation of photons, the
transmission of forces, and the manifestation of matter. The Aether comprises fundamental
entities of quantum space units, the Universe's building blocks.
Quantum units are not material particles in the conventional sense but rather discrete, indivisible
units of space that possess intrinsic properties such as spin, charge, and reciprocal mass.
These properties arise from the specific geometry and behavior of the quantum units, which are
governed by the fundamental principles of the APM.
The arrangement and interactions of these quantum units define the basic structure of the
Aether. Each quantum unit can be visualized as two spherical surfaces reciprocally coexisting
with four tubular loxodromes. The spherical surfaces represent the quantum unit's electrostatic
charge, while the tubular loxodromes represent the magnetic charge.
Each tubular loxodrome possesses its north-south magnetic dipole, a fundamental property of
the magnetic charge associated with that loxodrome. The four tubular loxodromes are arranged
in a specific pattern, with two loxodromes exhibiting right-handed spin and two exhibiting
left-handed spin. This arrangement is crucial to the behavior of the quantum units and the
manifestation of matter in the Universe.
The Aether unit as a whole possesses an electrostatic dipole, which arises from the two
spherical surfaces. However, only one subatomic particle may exist in any single Aether unit,
occupying only one of the spherical shells. As a result, a subatomic particle will have either a
positive or negative electrostatic monopole charge, depending on which half of the Aether unit it
occupies.
The spin of the loxodromes is not a material rotation but rather a fundamental property of the
quantum units that arise from the geometry of the tubular-loxodrome structure. All four tubular
loxodrome spin positions exist in the forward time direction and trace along the forward time's
spherical surface path. The APM proposes that this spin is directly related to the forward flow of
time, with the right-handed loxodromes associated with positrons and antiprotons and the
left-handed loxodromes associated with electrons and protons.
The unseen return paths from the poles to the Singularity, which connect the two halves of the
Aether unit, experience the backward time direction. This backward flow of time is hidden from
our perception and does not directly influence the behavior of subatomic particles confined to
the forward-time direction.
The dynamic nature of the Aether is a crucial feature of the APM and distinguishes it from the
static, immutable Aether proposed in classical physics. In the APM, the Aether is not a passive
medium but rather an active participant in the behavior of matter and its behavior in the
Universe.
The aether's discrete nature, composed of individual quantum units, also sets the APM apart
from continuous space models. By proposing a discrete structure for the Aether, the APM
provides a natural framework for quantizing space and unifying quantum mechanics with
general relativity.
In summary, the Aether in the APM is a dynamic and discrete medium composed of quantum
units, each consisting of a double-spherical structure with four tubular loxodromes. Each
loxodrome possesses its north-south magnetic dipole, while the Aether unit as a whole
possesses an electrostatic dipole. Subatomic particles may occupy only one-half of an Aether
unit, resulting in an electrostatic monopole charge while still possessing a magnetic dipole
charge due to the spin of the loxodromes. The forward time direction is associated with the
tubular loxodrome spin positions, while the backward time direction is hidden in the unseen
return paths from the poles to the Singularity.
The Role Of Aether Units In The Emergence Of Subatomic
Particles And The Transmission Of Forces
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), Aether units play a crucial role in the emergence of
subatomic particles and the transmission of forces. The structure and dynamics of Aether units
give rise to the fundamental properties of matter and its behavior and provide a mechanism for
the interaction between particles and fields. Let's explore these roles in more detail.
Emergence of Subatomic Particles:
Aether units are the fundamental building blocks of matter in the APM. Each Aether unit has a
specific structure, consisting of an electrostatic spherical surface and a magnetic charge tubular
loxodrome surface, giving rise to subatomic particle properties.
In the photoelectric effect, photons can transfer angular momentum to empty Aether units, such
as those in an atom's valence position (Andersen et al., 200620). This process results in the
emergence of subatomic particles (Afanasev et al., 201321).
However, creating visible matter from dark matter is a distinct process in phenomena such as
the Casimir effect and nuclear fission/fusion processes. In these cases, subatomic particles
become magnetically aligned at one quantum distance (Compton wavelength), and their
combined action draws on the Gforce to create a new Aether unit between them. During the
creation of this new Aether unit, a string of mass equal in quantity to the mass of the subatomic
particles creating this disturbance is absorbed from the sea of dark matter (mass strings) that
exists "outside" of Aether units. Thus, visible matter is made from dark matter by forming new
photons, and the photons are eventually absorbed by empty valence positions to create new
subatomic particles.
Transmission of Forces:
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), the transmission of forces is described through the
relationship between the Gforce and the fundamental force constants: Newton's gravitational
constant ( ), Coulomb's electrostatic force constant ( ), and the Aether unit or magnetic force
𝐺 𝑘𝐶
constant ( ). These constants are unified by the Gforce, which acts through each space
𝐴𝑢
quantum (Aether unit) and on the dimensions of mass, electrostatic charge, and magnetic
charge to produce the respective fundamental forces.
Gravitational Force:
The Newton gravitational force constant ( ) describes the nature of gravity in the APM as the
𝐺
tendency of space to be filled with mass. It is given by the equation:
𝐺= λ𝐶3·𝐹𝑞2
𝑚𝑎
where is the Compton wavelength, is the quantum frequency, and is the maximum
λ𝐶𝐹𝑞𝑚𝑎
amount of mass an Aether unit may contain. This constant can be interpreted as the quantum
space per maximum mass, indicating that gravity is the tendency of space to be filled with mass.
21 Afanasev, A., Carlson, C., & Mukherjee, A. (2013). Off-axis excitation of hydrogenlike atoms by twisted
photons. Physical Review A, 88(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.88.033841
20 Andersen, M., Ryu, C., Cladé, P., Natarajan, V., Vaziri, A., Helmerson, K., … & Phillips, W. (2006).
Quantized rotation of atoms from photons with orbital angular momentum. Physical Review Letters,
97(17). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.170406
Regarding the Gforce, the gravitational constant can be expressed as:
.
𝐺=𝐺𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒· λ𝐶2
𝑚𝑎2
This relationship demonstrates how the Gforce acts through the space quanta (Aether units) to
give rise to the gravitational force. The ratio equals the Schwarzschild radius for a black
𝑚𝑎
λ𝐶
hole, further supporting the interpretation of gravity as the tendency of space to be filled with
mass.
Magnetic Force:
The Aether unit, also known as the magnetic force constant ( ), is given by the equation:
𝐴𝑢
𝐴𝑢=𝑚𝑎·λ𝐶3·𝐹𝑞2
𝑒𝑎2
where is the maximum magnetic charge an Aether unit may contain. The constant
𝑒𝑎2𝐴𝑢
represents the maximum mass per maximum magnetic charge, or the maximum magnetism a
space quantum may contain. As a side note, the mass per magnetic charge ratio is the same for
the Aether unit and all subatomic particles.
In terms of the Gforce, the magnetic force constant can be expressed as:
.
𝐴𝑢=𝐺𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒· λ𝐶2
𝑒𝑎2
This relationship shows how the Gforce acts on magnetic charge through the Aether units to
give rise to the magnetic force, just as it does for mass and the gravitational force.
Electrostatic Force:
Coulomb's electrostatic force constant ( ) is also related to the Gforce. In the APM, it is given
𝑘𝐶
by the equation:
.
𝑘𝐶=𝐺𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒· λ𝐶2·16π2
𝑒𝑎2
This relationship demonstrates how the Gforce acts through the electrostatic charge of the
Aether units to give rise to the electrostatic force.
Unification of Forces:
The magnetic force constant ( ) mediates the magnetic force, Coulomb's constant ( )
𝐴𝑢𝑘𝐶
mediates the electrostatic force, and Newton's gravitational constant ( ) mediates the
𝐺
gravitational force. All three force constants are unified by the Gforce, which acts through each
space quantum (Aether unit) and on the dimensions of mass, electrostatic charge, and magnetic
charge to produce the respective fundamental forces.
This unification of forces through the Gforce and its relationship to the fundamental force
constants is a crucial feature of the Aether Physics Model. It provides a coherent framework for
understanding the transmission of forces and the interconnectedness of gravity, electrostatics,
and magnetism.
In summary, the transmission of forces in the Aether Physics Model is described through the
relationship between the Gforce and the fundamental force constants. The Gforce acts through
each space quantum (Aether unit) and on the dimensions of mass, electrostatic charge, and
magnetic charge to give rise to the gravitational, electrostatic, and magnetic forces, respectively.
Unifying these forces through the Gforce and its relationship to the force constants provides a
novel perspective on the nature of forces and their transmission in the Universe.
Gravitational Force and Black Holes:
In the APM, gravity is an inherent property of each Aether unit. Each subatomic particle is
constructed from an Aether unit; matter and space are intimately connected. The gravitational
force is the result of subatomic particles interacting with space.
In regions of extremely high space density, such as the centers of galaxies, the Aether reaches
its maximum density and cannot become more dense. Exceeding the maximum density of
space and matter can cause Aether units to collapse, forming a "black hole." This black hole
represents the condition of a physical “edge” of the Universe, beyond which Aether units cannot
exist. The length density (mass per length) of matter at which this collapse occurs is quantified
by the Schwarzschild radius.
It is important to note that, in the APM, a black hole is not considered a physical object but
rather a limit to the existence of Aether units and the physical matter they contain. When visible
matter “enters” a black hole, it loses its Aether structure, and the mass strings return to their
dark matter state. There are two separate causes for black holes. A galactic black hole is
caused by the size of a galaxy and its dark matter. For example, a material black hole
(collapsing star) is caused by matter reaching the maximum length density.
In summary, Aether units play a crucial role in the emergence of subatomic particles and the
transmission of forces in the Aether Physics Model. The photoelectric effect involves the transfer
of angular momentum from photons to empty Aether units, resulting in the emergence of
subatomic particles. On the other hand, the creation of visible matter from dark matter occurs
through the formation of new Aether units in phenomena such as the Casimir effect and nuclear
processes. Forces are properties of quantum Aether units. In regions of extremely high space
density, Aether units can collapse, forming a black hole representing the Universe's physical
edge and the limit of the existence of visible matter.
The Structure of Space and Matter:
The APM Proposes A Quantized Structure Of Space. The Three
Dimensions Of Length In The Aether Unit Correspond To The
Overall 2D Structure Of The Curved Surfaces And The Distance
Between Them
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), the space volume arises from the interactions of quantum
units called Aether units. These units have a specific three-dimensional structure and are
characterized by the Compton wavelength, which serves as the fundamental quantum length
scale. The quantum frequency, defined as chronovibration, equals the speed of photons divided
by the Compton wavelength.
Three Dimensions of Length and Aether Unit Structure:
The three dimensions of length at the Aether unit scale are determined by the curved surfaces
of the Aether units and the distance between adjacent units. Each Aether unit has an
electrostatic spherical surface and a magnetic charge tubular loxodrome surface. The surface
area of each sphere and each tubular loxodrome is precisely equal to the Compton wavelength
squared ( ).
λ𝐶2
Moreover, the distance between adjacent Aether units equals the Compton wavelength. This
consistent spacing and size of the Aether units give rise to the quantized space structure in the
APM.
Deformation and Conservation of Volume:
The shape of the spherical charge and tubular loxodromes within the Aether units can be
deformed under certain conditions, such as in relativistic effects. However, the APM postulates
that the total surface area of the Aether units tends to be conserved. In cases where the surface
area of an Aether unit deviates from the Compton wavelength squared, the distance between
adjacent units must compensate for the difference in length, ensuring that the total volume
remains conserved.
This volume conservation is a fundamental principle in the APM and is thought to give the
Universe its spatial consistency. Aether units throughout the Universe maintain a quantum
volume of , and any deviation from this volume, such as in particle collisions, can lead to a
λ𝐶3
breakdown of the quantized space structure.
Aether Fabric Structure and Packing Ratio:
The APM suggests that the geometric structure of the Aether units and their arrangement in
space are related to certain fundamental constants. The quantum Aether unit has a geometrical
constant , while the proton-to-electron mass ratio equals .
16π26π5
Based on these relationships, the APM proposes that the Aether packing ratio, which describes
the arrangement of Aether units in space, is given by . This packing ratio may
6π5
16π2=6
16π3
provide insights into the precise geometry of the Aether units and their relative positions, which
could help understand the physical processes underlying the theories of relativity.
The relationship between the Aether packing ratio and the fundamental constants suggests that
space structure in the APM is intimately connected to the properties of matter and its behavior.
Furthermore, the precise electron and proton masses may result from the Aether unit geometry
and its packing structure. By exploring these connections, the APM aims to provide a coherent
framework for unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity.
In summary, the Aether Physics Model proposes a quantized structure of space based on the
interactions of Aether units, characterized by the Compton wavelength and quantum frequency.
The three length dimensions at the Aether unit scale arise from the curved surfaces of these
units and the distance between them, which is also equal to the Compton wavelength. The APM
postulates that the volume of the Aether units is conserved, maintaining the spatial consistency
of the Universe. The Aether packing ratio, derived from fundamental constants, may provide
insights into the geometry and arrangement of Aether units, potentially leading to a deeper
understanding of the physical processes underlying the theories of relativity.
The Formation Of Subatomic Particles From One-Dimensional
Strings Of Mass (Dark Matter) Interacting With Aether Units
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), subatomic particles are formed through the interaction of
one-dimensional strings of mass, which are identified as dark matter, with Aether units. This
process is fundamental to the emergence of visible matter in the Universe and provides a novel
perspective on the relationship between dark matter and visible matter. Let's explore this
process in more detail.
One-Dimensional Strings of Mass (Dark Matter):
According to the APM, dark matter exists as one-dimensional mass strings. These strings are
the primary form of matter in the Universe and are responsible for the observed gravitational
effects that cannot be accounted for by visible matter alone.
The one-dimensional nature of these strings distinguishes them from the three-dimensional
structures of visible matter. In the APM, these mass strings are considered the fundamental
building blocks of matter, existing independently of the Aether units that give rise to space.
Interaction with Aether Units:
The formation of subatomic particles occurs when a one-dimensional string of mass interacts
with an Aether unit. The Aether unit, which consists of an electrostatic spherical surface and a
magnetic charge tubular loxodrome surface, provides the necessary structure for the string of
mass to manifest as a subatomic particle.
When a string of mass encounters an Aether unit, it becomes "trapped" within the unit,
occupying one of the four tubular loxodrome spin positions. The specific spin position that the
string occupies determines the type of subatomic particle that is formed, such as an electron,
positron, proton, or antiproton.
As the string of mass occupies a spin position within the Aether unit, it takes on the properties of
the corresponding subatomic particle. The string of mass acquires the charge and spin
characteristics associated with the specific loxodrome it occupies and the mass associated with
the particle.
Emergence of Visible Matter:
The APM explains the emergence of visible matter from dark matter through the interaction of
one-dimensional strings of mass with Aether units. As mass strings become trapped within
Aether units and take on the properties of subatomic particles, they become observable and
interact with other particles and fields in the Universe.
This particle formation process is ongoing, with dark matter continually interacting with Aether
units to give rise to new subatomic particles. The APM suggests that the balance between dark
matter and visible matter in the Universe is maintained through this dynamic process of particle
formation and dissolution.
Implications for Dark Matter Research:
The APM's description of dark matter as one-dimensional strings of mass and its role in forming
subatomic particles has important implications for dark matter research. By providing a
mechanism for the interaction between dark matter and visible matter, the APM offers a new
framework for understanding the nature of dark matter and its effects on the Universe.
This perspective on dark matter may guide future research efforts, suggesting new avenues for
experimental investigation and theoretical modeling. The APM's approach to particle formation
also has the potential to shed light on the problem of dark matter detection, as it provides a
specific mechanism for the interaction between dark matter and ordinary matter.
In summary, the Aether Physics Model proposes that subatomic particles are formed through
the interaction of one-dimensional mass strings, identified as dark matter, with Aether units. As
a string of mass becomes trapped within an Aether unit, occupying a specific tubular loxodrome
spin position, it acquires the properties of a subatomic particle, such as charge, spin, and mass.
This process is fundamental to the emergence of visible matter in the Universe and provides a
novel perspective on the relationship between dark matter and ordinary matter. The APM's
approach to particle formation has important implications for dark matter research and may
guide future experimental and theoretical efforts in this field.
The Significance Of The Two Frequency Dimensions,
Representing Both Forward-Backward Oscillation And Right-Left
Temporal Torque, In The Emergence Of Matter And The
Properties Of Subatomic Particles
In the Aether Physics Model (APM), the mass of subatomic particles is not determined by the
frequency of the temporal forward-backward oscillation (chronovibration) within the Aether unit.
Instead, it is likely determined by two fundamental constants: the Aether's geometrical constant
and the packing structure constant.
The Aether's geometrical constant, which is related to the structure and dimensions of individual
Aether units, and the packing structure constant, which describes the arrangement and
relationship between Aether units, together define the minimum and maximum mass that can be
contained within a tubular loxodrome spin position.
According to the APM, the electron mass represents the minimum mass contained within a
tubular loxodrome, while the proton mass represents the maximum mass. The specific values of
these masses are determined by the geometry of the Aether units and their packing structure
rather than by the frequency of the forward-backward time oscillation.
The ratio of the proton mass to the electron mass is a fundamental constant in the APM and
must agree with the geometry of the Aether units and their packing structure. This ratio is
approximately 1836.15, and its precise value is likely related to the specific dimensions and
arrangement of the Aether units.
Chronovibration and the Speed of Photons:
The frequency of chronovibration, which represents the forward-backward oscillation of time
within Aether units, is a physical constant in the APM. However, this frequency does not
determine the mass or behavior of subatomic particles.
Instead, the frequency of chronovibration establishes the constant speed of photons through the
Aether. This frequency is uniform throughout the Universe, and all Aether units must oscillate in
unison at the same chronovibration frequency to maintain temporal phase coherence.
The constant speed of photons, a fundamental feature of the Universe, is thus a direct
consequence of the uniform chronovibration frequency across all Aether units. This relationship
highlights the importance of temporal forward-backward oscillation in maintaining the stability
and consistency of the Aether as a medium for the propagation of light.
Right-Left Temporal Torque and Matter-Antimatter Distinction:
The right-left temporal torque, which represents the oscillation of time between the right and left
directions within Aether units, plays a crucial role in determining the matter-antimatter nature of
subatomic particles.
In the APM, the two right-handed loxodrome spin positions within Aether units are associated
with antimatter particles (positrons and antiprotons). In comparison, the two left-handed
loxodrome spin positions are associated with ordinary matter particles (electrons and protons).
The right-left temporal torque thus serves as the physical basis for the distinction between
matter and antimatter in the Universe. The orientation of this temporal torque within an Aether
unit determines whether the subatomic particle occupying that unit will exhibit the properties of
matter or antimatter.
It is important to note that the right-left temporal torque does not directly influence the mass or
energy of subatomic particles, as the geometry and packing structure of the Aether units
determines these properties.
In summary, the mass of subatomic particles in the Aether Physics Model is determined by the
Aether's geometrical constant and the packing structure constant, which define the minimum
and maximum mass that can be contained within a tubular loxodrome spin position. The
frequency of chronovibration, a physical constant, establishes the constant speed of photons
through the Aether and does not vary with the mass of subatomic particles. All Aether units
must oscillate at the same chronovibration frequency to maintain temporal phase coherence.
The right-left temporal torque determines whether a subatomic particle is ordinary matter or
antimatter but does not directly influence its mass or behavior.
The Implications Of The APM For Our Understanding Of The
Nature Of Matter, Its Behavior, And The Appearance Of Volume
The Aether Physics Model (APM) offers a novel perspective on the nature of matter, its
behavior, and the appearance of volume, which has significant implications for our
understanding of the fundamental structure of the Universe. The APM challenges conventional
notions of matter, behavior, and volume by proposing a quantized space based on the
interactions of Aether units and the emergence of subatomic particles from one-dimensional
strings of mass. Let's explore these implications in more detail.
Nature of Matter:
In the APM, matter is not fundamentally composed of solid, indivisible particles but rather
emerges from the interaction of one-dimensional strings of mass (dark matter) with Aether units.
This perspective challenges the traditional notion of matter as consisting of discrete, point-like
particles with intrinsic properties such as mass and charge.
According to the APM, the properties of subatomic particles, such as mass, charge, and spin,
arise from the specific geometry and dynamics of the Aether units that the particles occupy. The
mass of a particle is determined by the Aether's geometrical constant and the packing structure
constant. At the same time, its magnetic charge and spin are related to the orientation and
dynamics of the tubular loxodrome spin positions within the Aether unit.
This view of matter as an emergent phenomenon arising from the interaction of dark matter
strings with the structure of space offers a new framework for understanding the nature of
material reality. It suggests that the properties of matter are not intrinsic but rather are a
consequence of the underlying structure and dynamics of the Aether.
Nature of Energy:
The APM also offers a new perspective on the nature of energy. In conventional physics, energy
is often treated as a fundamental quantity, with various forms such as kinetic, potential, and rest
energy. However, in the APM, energy is seen as a consequence of the dynamics and
interactions of Aether units.
The oscillation and vibration of Aether units, driven by the forward-backward oscillation
(chronovibration) and the right-left temporal torque, give rise to the various forms of energy
observed in the Universe. For example, the kinetic energy of a moving particle can be
understood as the result of the propagation of oscillations through the Aether. In contrast, the
potential energy of a system can be seen as the result of the deformation and strain of Aether
units. Moreover, energy is just one of many behaviors experienced by subatomic particles, such
as potential, current, resistance, magnetic flux, angular momentum, etc.
The APM's perspective on energy suggests that it is not a fundamental quantity but rather an
emergent behavioral property of the dynamics and interactions of the underlying space
structure. This view may offer new insights into the nature of energy conservation, the
relationship between energy and matter, and the role of energy in the evolution of the Universe.
Appearance of Volume:
One of the most striking implications of the APM is its explanation for the appearance of volume
in the Universe. In conventional physics, the three-dimensional nature of space is often taken
for granted, and the origin of volume needs to be better understood. However, in the APM, the
appearance of volume is a consequence of the specific geometry and arrangement of Aether
units.
The APM proposes that the three-dimensional structure of space arises from the curved
surfaces of the Aether units and the distance between adjacent units. Each Aether unit has a
specific volume, determined by the Compton wavelength cubed ( ), and the arrangement of
λ𝐶3
these units gives rise to the large-scale structure of space.
However, the APM also suggests that the appearance of volume at the subatomic level is a
consequence of the two-dimensional structure of the tubular loxodrome spin positions within
Aether units. Although subatomic particles are essentially two-dimensional entities, occupying
specific spin positions within Aether units, the combination of their motion and the geometry of
the Aether units gives rise to the appearance of a three-dimensional particle volume.
This perspective on the origin of volume has significant implications for our understanding of the
nature of space and the relationship between the quantum world and the macroscopic Universe.
It suggests that space's three-dimensional nature is not fundamental but instead emerges from
the specific geometry and arrangement of the underlying Aether units.
In summary, the Aether Physics Model offers a radically new perspective on the nature of
matter, energy, and the appearance of volume in the Universe. By proposing that these
phenomena arise from the interaction of one-dimensional mass strings with the quantized
structure of space, the APM challenges conventional notions of material reality and suggests
that the properties of the Universe are emergent rather than fundamental. This perspective has
significant implications for our understanding of the nature of space, time, and the relationship
between the quantum world and the macroscopic Universe. As research into the APM
continues, it may offer new insights and predictions that could revolutionize our understanding of
the fundamental structure of reality.
Explanations of Physical Phenomena:
Physical Observations That The APM Can Explain Are The
Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect, Wigner Crystals, Casimir Effect,
And Others
Quantum Hall Effect:
The discovery of the quantum magnetic flux constant, denoted as ϕ₀(phi naught), with a value
of 2.067833831 × 10⁻¹⁵weber, presented a significant challenge to the conventional
understanding of physics. This constant, known as the elementary magnetic flux quantum, plays
a crucial role in quantum physics and has implications for various phenomena in the field.
The elementary magnetic flux quantum, represented by ϕ₀, is a fundamental constant that arises
in superconductivity, quantum magnetometry, and spin sensing (Iguchi et al., 202322); . It is
defined in mainstream physics as the ratio of Planck's constant ( ) to twice the elementary
ℎ
charge ( ), where is the Planck constant and is the elementary charge of the electron. This
2𝑒 ℎ 𝑒
constant is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. It is intimately linked to the behavior of
superconducting devices, such as superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs),
which rely on the quantization of magnetic flux for their operation (Iguchi et al., 2023; Granata &
Vettoliere, 201623).
The value of the elementary magnetic flux quantum, ϕ₀. This constant is essential for
understanding the quantization of magnetic flux and its role in various physical systems,
including superconductors, quantum circuits, and magnetic field sensing devices.
The discovery of the quantum magnetic flux constant, ϕ₀, challenged the conventional
understanding of physics by revealing the quantized nature of magnetic flux and its significance
in quantum phenomena. This constant has paved the way for advancements in
superconductivity, quantum magnetometry, and spin sensing, highlighting the profound impact
of fundamental constants on the behavior of physical systems.
According to the mainstream view, the fractional behavior observed in the quantum Hall effect
arises from the complex interactions between electrons in a two-dimensional electron system
subjected to a strong magnetic field. These interactions form collective states known as
fractional quantum Hall states, which exhibit fractional charges and fractional statistics. The term
"fractional" describes this unique and intriguing aspect of the Hall resistance quantization in
these systems.
However, the Aether Physics Model (APM) offers a different perspective on the nature of the
fractional charges involved in the quantum Hall effect. In the APM, there are two distinct types of
charge: electrostatic charge and magnetic charge. While the mainstream interpretation assumes
that the fractional charges are related to the electron's electrostatic charge, the APM suggests
that the magnetic charge is the appropriate charge to consider in the context of magnetic flux.
The relationship between the electrostatic charge ( ) and the magnetic charge ( ) in the
𝑒 𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥
APM is given by the equation:
𝑒2=8πα·𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥2
23 Granata, C. and Vettoliere, A. (2016). Nano superconducting quantum interference device: a powerful
tool for nanoscale investigations. Physics Reports, 614, 1-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.001
22 Iguchi, Y., Shi, R., Kihou, K., Lee, C., Barkman, M., Benfenati, A., … & Moler, K. (2023).
Superconducting vortices carrying a temperature-dependent fraction of the flux quantum. Science,
380(6651), 1244-1247. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9979
Where α is the electron fine structure constant. When expressed in Quantum Measurement
Units (QMU), this relationship takes the form:
ϕ0
𝑐𝑐𝑓 =𝑚𝑓𝑙𝑥
2
Here, ϕ₀is the quantum magnetic flux constant, is the QMU charge conversion factor, and
𝑐𝑐𝑓
mflx is the magnetic flux unit in QMU. The charge conversion factor is quantified as:
Or:
𝑐𝑐𝑓= 1
𝑒
𝑚𝑒·𝑚𝑒
𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥2
𝑐𝑐𝑓= 𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥2
𝑒
The magnetic flux unit can be further expressed in terms of the electron mass ( ), the
𝑚𝑒
Compton wavelength ( ), the quantum frequency ( ), and the magnetic charge ( ):
λ𝐶𝐹𝑞𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑚𝑓𝑙𝑥= 𝑚𝑒·λ𝐶2·𝐹𝑞
𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥2
The APM emphasizes the fundamental difference between electrostatic charge and magnetic
charge. Electrostatic charge exists in a spherical angle and is associated with a one-spin
charge. In contrast, magnetic charge exists in a steradian angle and is associated with a
half-spin charge. The electron fine structure constant determines the proportion between the
two charge types, highlighting their reciprocal relationship.
In the APM, the quantum magnetic flux of a half-spin particle, such as an electron, can be
expressed in QMU as . This value is obtained by converting the single-dimension
ϕ0
𝑐𝑐𝑓 =𝑚𝑓𝑙𝑥
2
electrostatic charge to the distributed-dimension magnetic charge.
The APM's interpretation of the fractional quantum Hall effect regarding quantum magnetic
charge offers a new perspective on the nature of the supposed fractional charges involved. By
considering the role of quantum magnetic charge and its relationship to electrostatic charge, the
APM provides a novel framework for understanding the supposed fractional behavior observed
in the quantum Hall effect.
This approach challenges the conventional understanding of fractional charges in the quantum
Hall effect. It highlights the importance of considering the distinct properties of electrostatic and
magnetic charges in the context of quantum phenomena. The APM's perspective on the
quantum magnetic flux constant and its relation to magnetic charge may lead to new insights
and further developments in studying the quantum Hall effect and related quantum phenomena.
Wigner Crystals:
The theoretical prediction of Wigner crystals, where electrons organize into a regular lattice due
to their mutual repulsion at low densities, has been a subject of interest in condensed matter
physics (Rogers & Loos, 201724; Fratini & Merino, 200925). The formation of Wigner crystals is a
consequence of the competition between the long-range Coulomb repulsion of electrons and
their kinetic energy, leading to the crystallization of the electron gas into a regular lattice
structure (Fratini & Merino, 2009; Shapir et al., 201926).
Despite the theoretical prediction of Wigner crystals, their direct experimental observation has
been challenging due to the delicate balance of interactions required for their formation (Rogers
& Loos, 2017; Wang et al., 202127). Experimental techniques such as imaging and
spectroscopic methods have been employed to study Wigner crystals in various systems,
including quantum wires and superlattices, aiming to provide direct evidence of their existence
(Rogers & Loos, 2017; Wang et al., 2021).
The elusive nature of Wigner crystals underscores the complexity of their formation and the
need for precise experimental conditions to observe these crystalline phases of matter. The
theoretical prediction of Wigner crystals and the ongoing efforts to experimentally verify their
existence highlight the significance of these states in understanding the behavior of electrons in
low-density systems.
The APM offers a new perspective on the formation and properties of Wigner crystals,
emphasizing the role of magnetic charge. In the APM, the crystalline structure of Wigner crystals
may arise from the specific arrangement and interactions of magnetic charges within the Aether
units in the presence of low-density electron gases.
The magnetic alignment between electrons can be understood as a consequence of the
interactions between the magnetic charges associated with the electrons. As the electron
density decreases, the magnetic charges within the Aether units may rearrange themselves into
a regular, crystalline lattice to minimize the overall interaction energy, giving rise to the Wigner
crystal structure.
The Casimir Effect:
The Casimir effect, first predicted by Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir in 1948, is a quantum
mechanical phenomenon in which two uncharged, conducting plates placed in close proximity
27 Wang, R., Li, H., Li, S., Regan, E., Wang, D., Zhao, W., … & Crommie, M. (2021). Imaging generalized
wigner crystal states in a wse2/ws2 moiré superlattice.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-390032/v1
26 Shapir, I., Hamo, A., Pecker, S., Moca, C., Legeza, Ö., Zaránd, G., … & Ilani, S. (2019). Imaging the
electronic wigner crystal in one dimension. Science, 364(6443), 870-875.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0905
25 Fratini, S. and Merino, J. (2009). Unconventional metallic conduction in two-dimensional
hubbard-wigner lattices. Physical Review B, 80(16). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.80.165110
24 Rogers, F. and Loos, P. (2017). Excited-state wigner crystals. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 146(4).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974839
experience an attractive force. This force arises from the vacuum fluctuations of the
electromagnetic field between the plates. Steven Lamoreaux conducted an experiment in 1996
to confirm the accuracy of the Casimir effect equation, with a margin of error of only 5% (Chan
et al., 200128).
The Casimir effect is a well-known consequence of quantum vacuum fluctuations, where the
alteration by the boundaries of the zero-point electromagnetic energy leads to an attractive force
between the plates (Bordag et al., 200129). This effect is a fundamental issue in quantum
physics and has been a subject of interest since Casimir predicted it in 1948 (Kenneth & Klich,
200630).
Experimental studies and theoretical investigations have further explored the Casimir effect,
demonstrating its generality and applications in various fields of physics (Klimchitskaya et al.,
200931). The Casimir effect has been studied in the context of superconductivity, materials
science, and quantum field theory, highlighting its significance in understanding fundamental
interactions at the quantum level (Inui, 202132; Milton, 200433).
The Aether Physics Model (APM) offers a novel perspective on the Casimir effect, emphasizing
the role of magnetic charge in explaining the observed phenomenon. According to the APM, the
Casimir effect can be understood as the magnetic charge of the electrons in the metal plates
affecting each other through a form of Coulomb's law.
The original Casimir equation for the attractive force between two plates is given by:
𝐹= π·ℎ·𝑐·𝐴
480·𝐿4
Planck's constant is the speed of photons , the area of the plates , and the distance
ℎ 𝑐 𝐴 𝐿
between them. However, in the APM, the term is replaced by the unit of the photon ( ),
ℎ·𝑐 𝑝ℎ𝑡𝑛
and the force is expressed in QMU units of :
𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐
𝐹= π·𝑝ℎ𝑡𝑛·𝐴
480·𝐿4=6.545×10−3𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐
33 Milton, K. (2004). The casimir effect: recent controversies and progress. Journal of Physics a
Mathematical and General, 37(38), R209-R277. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/37/38/r01
32 Inui, N. (2021). Casimir effect between superconducting plates in the mixed state. Quantum Reports,
3(4), 731-745. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum3040046
31 Klimchitskaya, G., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. (2009). The casimir force between real materials:
experiment and theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(4), 1827-1885.
https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.81.1827
30 Kenneth, O. and Klich, I. (2006). Opposites attract: a theorem about the casimir force. Physical Review
Letters, 97(16). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.160401
29 Bordag, M., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. (2001). New developments in the casimir effect.
Physics Reports, 353(1-3), 1-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00015-1
28 Chan, H., Aksyuk, V., Bishop, D., & Capasso, F. (2001). Quantum mechanical actuation of
microelectromechanical systems by the casimir force. Science, 291(5510), 1941-1944.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057984
Interestingly, the numerical term is very close to , the geometrical
π
480 1
16π2=6.333×10−3
constant of the Aether in the APM. This suggests that the Casimir equation might be more
accurately expressed as:
𝐹= 𝑝ℎ𝑡𝑛·𝐴
16π2·𝐿4=6.333×10−3𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐
Furthermore, the term is equal to the magnetic charge of the electron times Coulomb's
𝑝ℎ𝑡𝑛
16π2
constant:
𝑝ℎ𝑡𝑛
16π2=𝑘𝐶·𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥2
where is Coulomb's constant and is the magnetic charge of the electron. This allows the
𝑘𝐶𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥
Casimir equation to be transposed as:
𝐹= 𝑘𝐶·𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥2·𝐴
𝐿4=6.333×10−3𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐
Taking the area and lengths to be the quantum length, the adjusted Casimir equation simplifies
to the APM's magnetic force equation for the electron:
𝐴𝑢𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥·𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥
λ𝐶2=𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐
Where is the Aether unit (magnetic force constant) and is the Compton wavelength.
𝐴𝑢λ𝐶
The success of the Casimir effect experiments provides evidence for the existence of the
electron's magnetic charge. It also supports the APM's assertion that the photon is equal to the
electron's angular momentum times the speed of photons. To calculate the force between two
Casimir plates, one can measure the magnetic charge of each plate, divide by the distance
between them squared, and multiply by the Aether constant.
Lamoreaux's experiment observed an anomalous potential of 430 mV when the Casimir plates
were separated but externally shorted together. While Lamoreaux attributed this to various
metallic contacts, the APM offers an alternative explanation: photons may have emerged from
the Aether between the plates, with their angular momentum coming from between the Aether
units (dark matter). The short between the plates could have provided a resistance load,
converting the photons into electrons via the photoelectric effect, causing the electrons to flow
and balance the opposite potentials of the plates.
In summary, the Aether Physics Model provides a novel perspective on the Casimir effect,
emphasizing the role of magnetic charge and the geometrical constant of the Aether in
explaining the observed phenomenon. The success of Casimir effect experiments supports the
existence of the magnetic charge of the electron and the APM's interpretation of the photon. The
anomalous potential observed in Lamoreaux's experiment may be explained by the emergence
of photons from the Aether between the plates, further supporting the APM's description of the
Casimir effect.
Quantum Entanglement:
Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon in which two or more particles exhibit correlations in
their properties that cannot be explained by classical physics. Entangled particles can exhibit
instantaneous correlations over large distances, challenging our understanding of locality and
causality. This concept has been extensively studied in quantum mechanics and has profound
implications for various quantum phenomena.
The theoretical prediction and experimental verification of quantum entanglement have
revolutionized our understanding of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. The
phenomenon of entanglement, first proposed by Schrödinger, highlights the existence of
nonlocal correlations between quantum systems that defy classical explanations Yanuwar
(202434) Cavalcanti et al., 201635). These correlations, as demonstrated by Bell's inequalities,
showcase the intrinsic nonlocality of entangled states and challenge classical notions of
causality and locality (Christandl et al., 202036; Gavreev et al., 202237).
Quantum entanglement has been a central focus in quantum information science, quantum
computing, and quantum communication due to its unique properties and potential applications
(Jozsa & Linden, 200338; Akibue et al., 201739). The entanglement of quantum states has been
shown to enable quantum-enhanced performance in various quantum technologies, highlighting
39 Akibue, S., Owari, M., Kato, G., & Murao, M. (2017). Entanglement-assisted classical communication
can simulate classical communication without causal order. Physical Review A, 96(6).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.96.062331
38 Jozsa, R. and Linden, N. (2003). On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up.
Proceedings of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 459(2036),
2011-2032. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2002.1097
37 Gavreev, M., Mastiukova, A., Kiktenko, E., & Fedorov, A. (2022). Learning entanglement breakdown as
a phase transition by confusion. New Journal of Physics, 24(7), 073045.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac7fb2
36 Christandl, M., Ferrara, R., & Lancien, C. (2020). Random private quantum states. Ieee Transactions
on Information Theory, 66(7), 4621-4640. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2020.2973155
35 Cavalcanti, D., Guerini, L., Rabelo, R., & Skrzypczyk, P. (2016). General method for constructing local
hidden variable models for entangled quantum states. Physical Review Letters, 117(19).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.117.190401
34 Yanuwar, E. (2024). Qudit concurrence and monogamy. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2734(1),
012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2734/1/012069
the practical significance of entanglement in modern physics (Liang et al., 201240; Kaur et al.,
202141).
The study of entanglement has also led to insights into the nature of quantum coherence,
quantum discord, and the role of entanglement in quantum computational speed-up (Bohmann
et al., 201742; Honda, 201243). The existence of entanglement between causally disconnected
regions in cosmological models has raised intriguing questions about the implications of
entanglement in the multiverse and its cosmological significance.
The APM offers a new perspective on the nature of quantum entanglement, emphasizing the
role of magnetic charge. In the APM, entanglement may arise from the specific arrangement
and interactions of magnetic charges within the Aether units associated with the entangled
particles.
The APM suggests that entangled particles may share a common "history" regarding their
interactions with the magnetic charges within the Aether. This shared history may give rise to
correlations in the properties of the particles, even when large distances separate them.
The instantaneous nature of entanglement correlations may be explained by the
interconnectedness of magnetic charges within the Aether, which allows for information
propagation and influences through means other than electrostatic fields. This
interconnectedness aspect of the magnetic charges is a consequence of the quantized space
structure proposed by the APM.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy:
Dark matter and dark energy are two of the most significant unsolved problems in modern
physics. Dark matter is proposed to explain the observed gravitational effects in galaxies and
galaxy clusters that cannot be accounted for by visible matter. In contrast, dark energy is
invoked to explain the Universe's accelerated expansion. The existence of dark matter and dark
energy challenges our current understanding of the cosmos and has profound implications for
cosmology and astrophysics.
The leading candidates for dark matter include nonbaryonic particles, such as axions or
neutralinos, which are slowly moving elementary particles left over from the earliest moments of
the universe Turner (200144). Dark matter is crucial for explaining the observed gravitational
44 Turner, M. (2001). Dark matter and dark energy in the universe..
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812810434_0026
43 Honda, K. (2012). Graphical classification of entangled qutrits. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical
Computer Science, 95, 123-141. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.95.11
42 Bohmann, M., Sperling, J., & Vogel, W. (2017). Entanglement verification of noisy noon states. Physical
Review A, 96(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.96.012321
41 Kaur, J., Bagchi, S., & Pati, A. (2021). Remote creation of quantum coherence via indefinite causal
order.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2103.04894
40 Liang, Y., Masanes, L., & Rosset, D. (2012). All entangled states display some hidden nonlocality.
Physical Review A, 86(5). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.86.052115
effects on large scales, such as the rotation curves of galaxies and the dynamics of galaxy
clusters, where the visible matter alone is insufficient to account for the observed phenomena
(Clowe et al., 200645; Sawala et al., 201646).
On the other hand, dark energy is postulated to be responsible for the accelerated expansion of
the Universe, as evidenced by observations of distant supernovae (Bahcall et al., 199947). The
nature of dark energy remains one of the most pressing questions in modern physics, with
proposed explanations including a cosmological constant, a rolling scalar field (quintessence),
or other fundamental physics mechanisms (Peebles & Ratra, 200348; Bahcall et al., 1999).
Experimental and observational efforts, such as those involving the detection and identification
of dark matter particles, the study of dark matter halos in galaxies, and the investigation of the
cosmic microwave background radiation, aim to shed light on the nature of dark matter and dark
energy (Oman et al., 201649; Cerdeño, 201150; Loeb & Weiner, 201151). These endeavors are
crucial for advancing our understanding of the fundamental constituents of the universe and the
mechanisms driving its evolution.
The APM offers a novel perspective on the nature of dark matter and dark energy, emphasizing
the magnetic charge's role. In the APM, dark matter is identified as one-dimensional strings of
mass that interact with the magnetic charges within Aether units to give rise to visible matter.
The magnetic charge results from the string of mass scanning the tubular loxodrome within a
quantum moment. Gravity results from the tendency of space to be filled with mass, whether
that mass is made of free strings or captured strings. The specific properties and interactions of
these dark matter strings with strings within magnetic charges may explain the observed
gravitational effects attributed to dark matter.
According to the APM, dark energy may result from the Gforce on cosmic scales. This could
lead to the accelerated expansion of the Universe through the creation of visible matter from
dark matter through processes like the Casimir effect and nuclear reactions. The APM suggests
51 Loeb, A. and Weiner, N. (2011). Cores in dwarf galaxies from dark matter with a yukawa potential.
Physical Review Letters, 106(17). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.171302
50 Cerdeño, D. (2011). Detection and identification of dark matter. International Journal of Modern Physics
Conference Series, 01, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010194511000134
49 Oman, K., Navarro, J., Sales, L., Fattahi, A., Frenk, C., Sawala, T., … & White, S. (2016). Missing dark
matter in dwarf galaxies?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 460(4), 3610-3623.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1251
48 Peebles, P. and Ratra, B. (2003). The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of Modern
Physics, 75(2), 559-606. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.75.559
47 Bahcall, N., Ostriker, J., Perlmutter, S., & Steinhardt, P. (1999). The cosmic triangle: revealing the state
of the universe. Science, 284(5419), 1481-1488. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5419.1481
46 Sawala, T., Frenk, C., Fattahi, A., Navarro, J., Bower, R., Crain, R., … & White, S. (2016). The apostle
simulations: solutions to the local group's cosmic puzzles. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical
Society, 457(2), 1931-1943. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw145
45 Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A., Markevitch, M., Randall, S., Jones, C., … & Zaritsky, D. (2006). A
direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter. The Astrophysical Journal, 648(2), L109-L113.
https://doi.org/10.1086/508162
that dark energy is not a distinct, enigmatic form of energy, but rather a consequence of the
fundamental Gforce.
The APM's approach to dark matter and dark energy offers a unified framework for
understanding these phenomena without the need for exotic particles or additional forms of
energy. By proposing a quantized space structure and the emergence of visible matter from the
interaction of dark matter strings with magnetic charges, the APM provides a novel perspective
on these long-standing problems in physics.
In summary, the Aether Physics Model offers a novel framework for understanding a wide range
of physical phenomena, including the anomalous quantum Hall effect, Wigner crystals, the
Casimir effect, quantum entanglement, and the problems of dark matter and dark energy. By
emphasizing the crucial role of magnetic charge in these phenomena, the APM provides a new
perspective that challenges conventional theories. The specific arrangement and interactions of
magnetic charges within the quantized space structure of Aether units may give rise to the
observed phenomena and offer potential explanations for their underlying mechanisms. As
research into the APM continues, it may lead to new predictions and experimental tests that
could validate or refine the model, potentially revolutionizing our understanding of the
fundamental nature of reality.
Comparing And Contrasting The APM's Explanations With Those
Of The Standard Model, Highlighting The Advantages Of The
APM
When comparing the Aether Physics Model's (APM) explanations of various physical
phenomena with those of the Standard Model, it is essential to highlight the APM approach's
key differences and potential advantages. Examples include the Casimir effect, Wigner crystals,
and the anomalous quantum Hall effect.
Casimir Effect:
Standard Model: The Casimir effect is typically explained as a result of the vacuum fluctuations
of the electromagnetic field between two uncharged, conducting plates. These fluctuations are
considered to be virtual photons that exert a net attractive force between the plates.
APM: The APM explains the Casimir effect as a result of the magnetic charge of the electrons in
the metal plates affecting each other through a form of Coulomb's law. The Aether units
between the plates play a crucial role in the emergence of photons, which are then converted
into electrons via the photoelectric effect when the plates are externally shorted together.
Advantage of APM: The APM provides a more physical and intuitive explanation for the Casimir
effect by emphasizing the role of magnetic charge and the Aether units. It avoids the need for
virtual photons and offers a mechanism for the observed anomalous potential in Lamoreaux's
experiment.
Wigner Crystals:
Standard Model: In the Standard Model, Wigner crystals are explained due to the mutual
repulsion between electrons in a low-density electron gas. The formation of the crystalline lattice
is attributed to the minimization of the system's potential energy.
APM: The APM explains the formation of Wigner crystals through the collective behavior of
electrons, which is influenced by the magnetic charge imparted by the Aether units. The
synchronization of electron magnetic alignment leads to the emergence of the crystalline
structure.
Advantage of APM: The APM provides a more fundamental explanation for forming Wigner
crystals by considering the role of the subatomic particle’s magnetic charge. It offers a
mechanism for synchronizing electron alignments and the stability of the crystalline lattice,
which is not explicitly addressed in the Standard Model.
Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect:
Standard Model: The Standard Model explains the anomalous quantum Hall effect due to the
complex interactions between electrons in a two-dimensional electron system under a strong
magnetic field. The fractional values of the Hall conductance are attributed to the formation of
fractional quantum Hall states, which exhibit fractional charges and fractional statistics.
APM: The APM explains the “anomalous” quantum Hall effect as a consequence of the
reorganization of the electron magnetic charges due to the interaction with the magnetic field
(Aether units). The supposed “fractional” quantum Hall states are whole quantum magnetic
charges.
Advantage of APM: The APM provides a more geometric and unified explanation for the
quantum Hall effect by considering the role of the Aether units and the electron magnetic
charges. It offers a mechanism for the emergence of whole quantum magnetic charges, which
needs to be explicitly addressed in the Standard Model.
In summary, the Aether Physics Model provides alternative explanations for various physical
phenomena compared to the Standard Model. The APM's explanations often emphasize the
role of the Aether units and magnetic charge in the emergence of these phenomena. The APM's
approach offers potential advantages, such as more physical and intuitive explanations, the
avoidance of virtual particles, and a more unified understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
However, it is essential to note that the APM is still a developing theory, and further research
and experimental validation are necessary to establish its viability as a comprehensive
alternative to the Standard Model.
Implications and Future Directions
Exploring The Broader Implications Of The APM For Our
Understanding Of The Universe, Including The Unification Of
Fundamental Forces And The Nature Of Dark Matter And Dark
Energy
The Aether Physics Model (APM) offers a novel perspective on the fundamental nature of the
Universe, with significant implications for our understanding of the unification of forces, dark
matter, and dark energy. By proposing a quantized space structure based on the interactions of
Aether units and the emergence of matter and its behavior from the Gforce and the Aether, the
APM provides a unified framework for addressing some of the most pressing issues in
contemporary physics.
Unification of Fundamental Forces:
One of the key objectives of modern physics is the unification of the fundamental forces: gravity,
electrostatic force, magnetic (strong) force, and weak interaction. The Standard Model has
successfully unified the electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces through the framework of
quantum field theory, but the unification of gravity remains a major challenge.
The APM offers a new approach to the unification of forces by proposing that all fundamental
forces arise from the interactions of the Gforce with the dimensions of mass and charges within
the Aether units. In the APM, the Gforce is a universal reciprocal force that permeates all of
space and is responsible for the emergence of the Aether units and the observed properties of
matter and its behavior.
The APM suggests that the fundamental forces are not independent entities but are instead
different manifestations of the Gforce acting on the dimensions of mass, electrostatic charge,
and magnetic charge within the Aether units. This unified description of forces provides a new
perspective on the nature of gravity and its relationship to the other fundamental forces,
potentially offering a path towards a theory of quantum gravity.
Dark Matter:
Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter that is thought to make up a significant portion of
the Universe's total mass. Its existence is inferred from observations of gravitational effects that
cannot be explained by visible matter alone. However, the nature and composition of dark
matter remain unknown, and its detection has proven to be a major challenge in contemporary
physics.
The APM offers a novel perspective on the nature of dark matter by proposing that it consists of
one-dimensional strings of mass that interact with the Aether units to give rise to visible matter.
In this view, dark matter is not a separate, exotic form of matter but a fundamental constituent of
the Universe that underlies the emergence of all observable matter.
The APM's description of dark matter as one-dimensional mass strings provides a new
framework for understanding its properties and interactions. By considering the role of dark
matter in the emergence of visible matter through its interaction with the Aether units, the APM
may offer new insights into the nature of dark matter and guide future efforts in its detection and
study.
Dark Energy:
Dark energy is a hypothetical form of energy that is thought to permeate all of space and drive
the accelerated expansion of the Universe. Its existence is inferred from observations of the
Universe's expansion rate, which cannot be explained by the known forms of matter and its
behavior. Like dark matter, the nature and composition of dark energy remain unknown, and its
study is a major focus of contemporary cosmology.
The APM offers a new perspective on the nature of dark energy by proposing that it is related to
the Gforce, which is responsible for the emergence and dynamics of the Aether units. In this
view, dark energy is not a separate, mysterious form of energy but a manifestation of the Gforce
acting on the Aether units on cosmic scales.
The APM's description of dark energy as a consequence of the Gforce and the dynamics of the
Aether units provides a new framework for understanding the Universe’s accelerated expansion.
Gforce’s role in the large-scale structure of the Universe may offer new insights into the nature
of dark energy and guide future efforts in its study and potential utilization.
Implications for Cosmology:
The APM's unified approach to the fundamental forces, dark matter, and dark energy has
significant implications for our understanding of cosmology and the evolution of the Universe. By
providing a new framework for describing the emergence and interactions of matter and its
behavior, the APM may offer alternative explanations for various cosmological phenomena,
such as the formation of large-scale structures, the cosmic microwave background, and the
apparent fine-tuning of the Universe's initial conditions.
Furthermore, the APM's emphasis on the quantized nature of space and the role of the Gforce
in the dynamics of the Universe may provide new insights into the Universe's dynamics. By
offering a unified description of the fundamental constituents of the Universe and their
interactions, the APM may contribute to the development of a more comprehensive and
coherent cosmological model.
Conclusion:
The Aether Physics Model offers a novel and thought-provoking framework for understanding
the fundamental nature of the Universe, with significant implications for the unification of forces,
dark matter, dark energy, and cosmology. By proposing a quantized space structure based on
the interactions of Aether units and the emergence of matter and its behavior from the Gforce
and the Aether, the APM provides a unified approach to some of the most pressing issues in
contemporary physics.
While the APM is still a developing theory and requires further research and experimental
validation, its potential to offer new insights and guide future efforts in studying the Universe's
fundamental constituents and their interactions is significant. As research into the APM
continues, it may lead to new predictions, experimental tests, and discoveries that could
revolutionize our understanding of the Universe and our place within it.
Potential Applications Of The APM In Various Fields, Such As
Technology, Cosmology, Or Quantum Computing
The Aether Physics Model (APM) offers a novel perspective on the fundamental nature of the
Universe, with potential applications in various fields such as technology, cosmology, and
quantum computing. By providing a unified framework for understanding the emergence and
interactions of matter and its behavior, the APM may inspire new approaches to problem-solving
and innovation in these fields. Let's explore some potential applications of the APM in more
detail.
Technology:
The APM's description of the quantized nature of space and the role of the Gforce in the
dynamics of matter and its behavior may have significant implications for developing new
technologies. For example, the APM's emphasis on the magnetic charge of subatomic particles
and its relationship to the Aether units may inspire novel approaches to the design of magnetic
materials and devices, such as high-performance magnets, nanotechnology, sensors, and data
storage systems.
Furthermore, the APM's unified approach to the fundamental forces may guide the development
of new energy technologies, such as advanced propulsion systems and power generation
methods that harness the principles of the Gforce and the Aether. The APM's insights into the
nature of dark matter and dark energy may also contribute to developing novel materials and
technologies that interact with these mysterious components of the Universe.
Cosmology:
The APM's unified approach to the fundamental forces, dark matter, and dark energy has
significant implications for cosmology and our understanding of the Universe's evolution. By
providing a new framework for describing the emergence and interactions of matter and its
behavior, the APM may inspire alternative cosmological models that offer new insights into the
formation of large-scale structures, the cosmic microwave background, and the apparent
fine-tuning of the Universe's initial conditions.
The APM's emphasis on the quantized nature of space and the role of the Gforce in the
dynamics of the Universe may also guide the development of new observational techniques and
instruments that can probe older stages of the Universe's evolution. These advances may
contribute to a more comprehensive and coherent understanding of the Universe's history and
future evolution.
Quantum Computing:
The APM's description of the quantized nature of space and the role of the Aether units in the
emergence of subatomic particles may have significant implications for the field of quantum
computing. Quantum computers harness the principles of quantum mechanics to perform
complex calculations and simulations beyond classical computers' capabilities.
The APM's insights into the nature of quantum entanglement and the role of the dual frequency
dimensions (chronovibration and right-left temporal torque) in the behavior of subatomic
particles may inspire new approaches to designing and implementing quantum computing
algorithms and hardware. For example, the APM's description of the Aether units as the
fundamental building blocks of space may guide the development of novel quantum error
correction codes and fault-tolerant architectures that can overcome the challenges of
decoherence and noise in quantum systems.
Furthermore, the APM's unified approach to the fundamental forces and the emergence of
matter and its behavior may contribute to developing new quantum simulation techniques that
can model complex physical systems, such as materials with exotic properties or the behavior of
particles in extreme environments. These advances may lead to material science, drug
discovery, and fundamental physics breakthroughs.
Other Fields:
The potential applications of the APM extend beyond technology, cosmology, and quantum
computing. For example, the APM's insights into the nature of consciousness and the
relationship between mind and matter may inspire new approaches to studying neuroscience,
psychology, and philosophy. The APM's emphasis on the unity and interconnectedness of all
phenomena may also contribute to developing new ecological and sustainability paradigms that
recognize the intrinsic value and interdependence of all forms of life.
Conclusion:
The Aether Physics Model offers a rich and thought-provoking framework for understanding the
fundamental nature of the Universe, with potential applications in various fields such as
technology, cosmology, quantum computing, and beyond. By providing a unified approach to
emergence and interactions of matter and its behavior, the APM may inspire new approaches to
problem-solving and innovation that can lead to breakthroughs in these fields.
While the specific applications of the APM will depend on further research and experimental
validation, its potential to guide the development of new technologies, cosmological models,
quantum computing algorithms, and interdisciplinary frameworks is significant. As research into
the APM continues, it may spark new collaborations and discoveries that can transform our
understanding of the Universe and our ability to harness its fundamental principles for the
betterment of humanity and the world around us.
Future Research Directions And Open Questions Within The APM
Framework
The Aether Physics Model (APM) offers a novel and thought-provoking framework for
understanding the fundamental nature of the Universe, with significant implications for various
fields of study. As an emerging theory, the APM presents numerous avenues for future research
and exploration, as well as open questions that invite further investigation. Let's outline some
key research directions and open questions within the APM framework.
Experimental Validation:
One of the primary research directions within the APM framework is the experimental validation
of its key concepts and predictions. While the APM offers a coherent and unified description of
the Universe's fundamental constituents and their interactions, it is essential to subject its claims
to rigorous experimental testing.
Future research efforts could focus on designing and conducting experiments to probe the
existence and properties of the Aether units, the Gforce, and the dual frequency dimensions
(chronovibration and right-left temporal torque). For example, high-precision measurements of
the Casimir effect, the anomalous quantum Hall effect, and other quantum phenomena may
provide opportunities to test the APM's predictions and compare them with those of the
Standard Model. The APM further predicts fine structures not only for the electron but also for
the Aether unit, protons, and neutrons, which may also be probed.
Mathematical Formalization:
Another important research direction within the APM framework is the mathematical
formalization of its key concepts and principles. While the APM provides a qualitative
description of the Universe's fundamental constituents and their interactions, developing a
rigorous mathematical framework to quantify these concepts and make precise predictions is
crucial.
The Aether Physics Model (APM) introduces a comprehensive and innovative system of
Quantum Measurements Units (QMU) based on the concept of distributed charge and the
distinction between electrostatic and magnetic charges. This approach allows for quantifying
physical phenomena in a manner yet to be recognized by the Standard Model. Chapter 6 of the
"Secrets of the Aether" document details the APM's unit system.
One of the critical features of the APM's unit system is using quantum measurements to
construct units rather than relying on arbitrary or macro-scale measurements like meters or
Earth's revolutions. Using quantum measurements, the APM can provide precise units for
specific quantum processes or structures. For example, the unit of one quantum photon is
determined by the primary angular momentum of a single electron traveling at the speed of
photons, establishing a discrete correlation between electron activity and photon production
(Chapter 6, p. 1).
The APM distinguishes between two main categories of units: Material Units, which apply to the
structure and mechanics of material objects, and Aether Units, which apply to the non-material
structure and mechanics of the Aether. This distinction is crucial for understanding the behavior
of matter and its behavior at the quantum level (Chapter 6, p. 1).
One of the most significant differences between the APM's unit system and the Standard Model
is the treatment of charge dimensions. In the APM, charge dimensions are always distributed as
charge squared, and most are expressed in terms of magnetic charge instead of elementary
charge. This approach reevaluates several standard electrical units, such as conductance,
capacitance, inductance, permittivity, and permeability (Chapter 6, pp. 2-3).
The APM also introduces the concept of opposing magnetic units, which arise when two
electrons oppose each other, causing the kinetic mass of the units to apply across two opposing
charges. This concept is crucial for understanding resistance and other related phenomena
(Chapter 6, p. 4).
The unit system of the APM is organized into a comprehensive grid, which includes material and
Aether expressions of various physical quantities. This grid is a foundation for exploring the
relationships between different units and their roles in describing quantum processes (Chapter
6, pp. 5-10).
The APM also introduces several new units, such as the eddy current unit (Chapter 6, p. 10)
and various magnetic field units (Chapter 6, pp. 10-12). These units provide a more accurate
and complete description of electromagnetic phenomena and their interactions with the Aether.
In summary, the Aether Physics Model's unit system, based on distributed charge and the
distinction between electrostatic and magnetic charges, offers a novel and comprehensive
approach to quantifying physical phenomena at the quantum level. By employing quantum
measurements and organizing units into a coherent grid, the APM provides a framework for
understanding the relationships between matter, its behavior, and the Aether, which goes
beyond the current limitations of the Standard Model.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy:
The nature of dark matter and dark energy remains one of the most significant open questions
in contemporary physics. While the APM offers a novel perspective on these phenomena,
suggesting that dark matter consists of one-dimensional strings of mass and that dark energy is
related to the Gforce, many unanswered questions and avenues for further exploration exist.
Future research efforts could focus on developing a more detailed understanding of the
properties and interactions of dark matter strings within the APM framework and exploring the
relationship between the Gforce and the observed accelerated expansion of the Universe. This
research could involve a combination of theoretical modeling, computational simulations, and
observational studies that seek to detect and characterize dark matter and dark energy in new
ways.
Quantum Gravity and the Unification of Forces:
The unification of gravity with the other fundamental forces and the development of a theory of
quantum gravity remain significant challenges in contemporary physics. While the APM offers a
novel approach to these challenges by proposing a unified description of the fundamental forces
based on the interactions of the Gforce with the Aether units, there are still many open
questions and avenues for further exploration.
Future research efforts could focus on developing a more detailed understanding of how gravity
emerges from the interactions of the Gforce with the Aether units and exploring the relationship
between the APM and existing approaches to quantum gravity, such as string theory and loop
quantum gravity. This research could involve a combination of theoretical modeling,
mathematical analysis, and computational simulations that seek to bridge the gap between the
quantum world and the Universe's large-scale structure.
Interdisciplinary Applications:
The APM's unified approach to the fundamental constituents of the Universe and their
interactions has potential implications for various fields beyond physics, such as biology,
neuroscience, and philosophy. Future research efforts could explore the interdisciplinary
applications of the APM framework, seeking to develop new insights and approaches to
long-standing questions in these fields.
For example, the APM's emphasis on the unity and interconnectedness of all phenomena may
inspire new approaches to studying consciousness, the mind-body problem, and the nature of
life itself. The APM's description of the Universe as a dynamic and self-organizing system may
also contribute to developing new ecological and sustainability paradigms that recognize the
intrinsic value and interdependence of all forms of existence.
Open Questions:
In addition to these research directions, numerous open questions within the APM framework
invite further investigation and exploration. Some of these questions include:
What is the origin of the Gforce and the Aether units, and how did they emerge from the
Singularity?
How do the Aether units interact with each other and give rise to the observed
properties of space, such as curvature and topology?
What is the relationship between the APM and other approaches to quantum gravity,
such as string theory and loop quantum gravity?
How can the APM be reconciled with the Standard Model of particle physics, and what
new particles or interactions does it predict?
What is the nature of consciousness within the APM framework, and how does it relate
to the fundamental constituents of the Universe?
These open questions and many others provide rich opportunities for further research and
exploration within the APM framework, inviting collaboration and contributions from researchers
across various fields of study.
Conclusion:
The Aether Physics Model offers a rich and thought-provoking framework for understanding the
fundamental nature of the Universe, with numerous avenues for future research and
exploration. From experimental validation and mathematical formalization to interdisciplinary
applications and open questions, the APM presents a wide range of opportunities for
researchers to advance our understanding of the Universe and our place within it.
As research into the APM continues, it may lead to discoveries, insights, and collaborations that
can transform our view of reality and inspire new approaches to long-standing challenges in
various fields of study. By embracing the spirit of curiosity, creativity, and critical inquiry that
underlies the scientific enterprise, researchers within the APM framework can contribute to the
ongoing quest for a more comprehensive and unified understanding of the cosmos and our role
in its unfolding story.
Conclusion
Summarized Key Points Of The APM And Its Potential To
Revolutionize Our Understanding Of Physics
The Aether Physics Model (APM) is a groundbreaking theory that offers a novel perspective on
the fundamental nature of the Universe, challenging many of the assumptions and limitations of
the Standard Model of physics. By proposing a unified framework based on the concept of a
quantized Aether and the emergence of matter and its behavior from the interactions of Aether
units, the APM can revolutionize our understanding of physics and provide solutions to some of
the most pressing problems in contemporary science.
Key points of the APM:
1. Quantized Aether: The APM proposes that space is filled with a dynamic and discrete
medium called the Aether, composed of fundamental units known as Aether units or quantum
units. These units are the building blocks of space and the source of all matter, its behavior, and
fundamental forces.
2. Emergence of matter and its behavior: matter and its behavior emerge from the interactions
of Aether units with the Gforce, a universal reciprocal force that permeates all of space.
Subatomic particles, such as electrons and protons, arise from the interaction of
one-dimensional strings of mass (dark matter) with the Aether units.
3. Unification of Fundamental Forces: The APM offers a unified description of the fundamental
forces, including gravity, electrostatic force, magnetic (strong) force, and weak interaction, as
emergent properties of the interactions between the Gforce and the Aether units. This approach
provides a path towards a theory of quantum gravity and the unification of all forces.
4. Explanation of Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The APM provides a novel perspective on the
nature of dark matter and dark energy, suggesting that dark matter consists of one-dimensional
strings of mass that interact with Aether units to give rise to visible matter, while dark energy is
related to the Gforce and its effects on the Aether units.
5. Unique System of Units: The APM introduces a comprehensive system of units based on the
concept of distributed charge and the distinction between electrostatic and magnetic charges.
This approach allows for quantifying physical phenomena in a manner not yet recognized by the
Standard Model, providing a more accurate and complete description of quantum processes.
6. Explanations of Various Physical Phenomena: The APM offers novel explanations for a wide
range of physical phenomena, such as the Casimir effect, the anomalous quantum Hall effect,
and the formation of Wigner crystals, by considering the role of the Aether units, the Gforce, and
the dual frequency dimensions of chronovibration and right-left temporal torque.
Potential to Revolutionize Physics:
The Aether Physics Model has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of physics by
providing a unified, coherent, and intellectually satisfying framework for describing the
fundamental nature of the Universe. By addressing many of the limitations and unanswered
questions of the Standard Model, such as the nature of dark matter and dark energy, the
unification of fundamental forces, and the origin of matter and space, the APM opens up new
avenues for theoretical and experimental exploration.
The APM's unique perspective on the quantized nature of space, the emergence of matter and
its behavior from the Aether, and the role of the Gforce in shaping the Universe's structure and
evolution has the potential to guide future research efforts and inspire new technologies and
applications in fields such as quantum computing, energy production, and space exploration.
Moreover, the APM's comprehensive system of units and ability to provide novel explanations
for a wide range of physical phenomena suggest that it may offer a more accurate and complete
description of reality than the Standard Model. As research into the APM continues, it may lead
to discoveries, predictions, and experimental tests that could validate or refine the theory,
ultimately leading to a profound shift in our understanding of the Universe and our place within
it.
In conclusion, the Aether Physics Model represents a bold and innovative approach to
understanding the fundamental nature of reality, offering a unified and intellectually satisfying
framework that challenges the limitations of the Standard Model. With its potential to
revolutionize our understanding of physics and guide future research efforts, the APM is a
promising candidate for a new paradigm in theoretical physics that could unlock the secrets of
the Universe and transform our relationship with the cosmos.
Engage With The Apm And Contribute To Its Development
The Aether Physics Model represents an exciting new frontier in our understanding of the
Universe, offering a fresh perspective on the fundamental nature of reality and challenging many
of the assumptions and limitations of the Standard Model. As with any groundbreaking scientific
theory, the development and refinement of the APM will require the collective efforts of
researchers, scientists, and enthusiasts from diverse backgrounds and disciplines.
We invite you, the reader, to engage with the Aether Physics Model and contribute to its ongoing
development. Whether you are a professional physicist, a student of science, or simply
someone with a deep curiosity about the workings of the Universe, your unique perspective and
insights can play a valuable role in advancing this innovative framework.
There are numerous ways in which you can get involved and contribute to the growth of the
APM:
1. Study and Analyze: Dive deep into the Aether Physics Model's concepts, equations, and
implications. Critically examine its assumptions, predictions, and explanations for various
physical phenomena. By thoroughly understanding the APM's foundations and its departures
from the Standard Model, you can identify areas for further exploration, refinement, or critique.
2. Conduct Research: Engage in theoretical and experimental research related to the key
concepts of the APM, such as the quantized Aether, the emergence of matter and its behavior
from Aether units, the unification of fundamental forces, and the nature of dark matter and dark
energy. Develop new hypotheses, design experiments, and analyze data to test the predictions
and validity of the APM.
3. Collaborate and Discuss: Join forums, discussion groups, and conferences dedicated to
exploring the Aether Physics Model and its implications. Engage in discussions with other
researchers, share your ideas and findings, and collaborate on projects to advance our
understanding of the APM and its potential applications.
4. Develop Applications: Explore the practical implications of the APM in various fields, such as
quantum computing, energy production, space exploration, and materials science. Develop new
technologies, algorithms, and approaches that leverage the insights and principles of the APM
to solve real-world problems and push the boundaries of human knowledge and capabilities.
5. Communicate and Educate: Help spread awareness about the Aether Physics Model and its
potential to revolutionize our understanding of physics. Write articles, create educational and
visualization content, and give presentations explaining the key concepts and implications of the
APM to a broad audience. Engage in public outreach and inspire others to explore this
fascinating new framework.
By actively engaging with the Aether Physics Model and contributing to its development, you
can join a global community of thinkers and innovators working to unlock the secrets of the
Universe and shape the future of physics. Your unique perspective, skills, and passion can
make a meaningful difference in advancing this groundbreaking theory and its potential to
transform our understanding of reality.
As we stand on the threshold of a new era in physics, we invite you to join us on this exciting
journey of discovery and exploration. Together, we can push the boundaries of human
knowledge, unravel the mysteries of the cosmos, and create a new paradigm for understanding
the fundamental nature of the Universe. The Aether Physics Model represents a bold step
forward in this endeavor, and your contributions can help shape its development and impact for
future generations.
Resources For Further Learning And Discussion
To further your understanding of the Aether Physics Model and engage with the community of
researchers and enthusiasts exploring this groundbreaking theory, we recommend the following
resources:
1. Secrets of the Aether: The primary sourcebook for the Aether Physics Model, "Secrets of the
Aether" (https://sota.aetherwizard.com) by David W. Thomson III and Jim D. Bourassa, provides
a comprehensive introduction to the key concepts, equations, and implications of the APM. This
book is essential reading for anyone looking to dive deep into the foundations of the theory and
its departures from the Standard Model.
2. Aether Physics Model Website: The official blog of the Aether Physics Model
(https://aetherwizard.com) serves as a central hub for information, resources, and updates
related to the APM. Here, you can find articles, papers, and presentations that delve into various
aspects of the theory, and links to related research and community discussions.
3. Quantum AetherDynamics Institute: The Quantum AetherDynamics Institute (QADI) is a
non-profit organization dedicated to advancing the study and development of the Aether Physics
Model. Their website (https://quantumAetherdynamics.org) features a wealth of resources,
including educational materials, research papers, and forums for engaging with other APM
enthusiasts.
4. Online Forums and Discussion Groups: Engage with the global community of APM
researchers and enthusiasts by participating in online forums and discussion groups. Platforms
like X, Quora, and Facebook host dedicated groups and threads where you can ask questions,
share ideas, and collaborate with others passionate about exploring the Aether Physics Model.
5. Conferences and Workshops: Attend conferences and workshops focusing on the Aether
Physics Model, quantum physics, and related topics. These events provide excellent
opportunities to learn from experts in the field, present your research and ideas, and network
with other APM enthusiasts. Watch for announcements on the Aether Physics Model website
and related forums.
6. Social Media: Follow the Aether Physics Model and related organizations on social media
platforms like X, Facebook, and LinkedIn. These channels often share updates, news, and
insights related to the APM and provide opportunities to connect with other enthusiasts and
researchers.
By exploring these resources and actively engaging with the APM community, you can deepen
your understanding of this groundbreaking theory, stay informed about the latest developments
and research, and contribute to the ongoing discussion and development of the Aether Physics
Model. Remember, your participation and unique perspective are valuable in advancing this
exciting new frontier in physics, and we encourage you to get involved and help shape the
future of this transformative theory.
References:
Afanasev, A., Carlson, C., & Mukherjee, A. (2013). Off-axis excitation of hydrogenlike atoms by
twisted photons. Physical Review A, 88(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.88.033841
Akibue, S., Owari, M., Kato, G., & Murao, M. (2017). Entanglement-assisted classical
communication can simulate classical communication without causal order. Physical Review A,
96(6). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.96.062331
Andersen, M., Ryu, C., Cladé, P., Natarajan, V., Vaziri, A., Helmerson, K., … & Phillips, W.
(2006). Quantized rotation of atoms from photons with orbital angular momentum. Physical
Review Letters, 97(17). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.170406
Bahcall, N., Ostriker, J., Perlmutter, S., & Steinhardt, P. (1999). The cosmic triangle: revealing
the state of the universe. Science, 284(5419), 1481-1488.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5419.1481
Bardeen, W., Hill, C., & Lindner, M. (1990). Minimal dynamical symmetry breaking of the
standard model. Physical Review D, 41(5), 1647-1660.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.41.1647
Ben-Naim, A. (2020). Entropy and time. Entropy, 22(4), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22040430
Bohmann, M., Sperling, J., & Vogel, W. (2017). Entanglement verification of noisy noon states.
Physical Review A, 96(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.96.012321
Bordag, M., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. (2001). New developments in the casimir effect.
Physics Reports, 353(1-3), 1-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00015-1
Capozziello, S., Laurentis, M., & Francaviglia, M. (2008). Higher-order gravity and the
cosmological background of gravitational waves. Astroparticle Physics, 29(2), 125-129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2007.12.001
Cavalcanti, D., Guerini, L., Rabelo, R., & Skrzypczyk, P. (2016). General method for
constructing local hidden variable models for entangled quantum states. Physical Review
Letters, 117(19). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.117.190401
Cerdeño, D. (2011). Detection and identification of dark matter. International Journal of Modern
Physics Conference Series, 01, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010194511000134
Chan, H., Aksyuk, V., Bishop, D., & Capasso, F. (2001). Quantum mechanical actuation of
microelectromechanical systems by the casimir force. Science, 291(5510), 1941-1944.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057984
Christandl, M., Ferrara, R., & Lancien, C. (2020). Random private quantum states. Ieee
Transactions on Information Theory, 66(7), 4621-4640. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2020.2973155
Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A., Markevitch, M., Randall, S., Jones, C., … & Zaritsky, D.
(2006). A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter. The Astrophysical Journal,
648(2), L109-L113. https://doi.org/10.1086/508162
Dixon, L. J. and Sofianatos, Y. (2009). Resonance-continuum interference in light higgs boson
production at a photon collider. Physical Review D, 79(3).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79.033002
Escultura, E. (2018). Technological applications of the grand unified theory. Advances in Social
Sciences Research Journal, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.59.5162
Ferreira, T., Vasconcellos, C., & Hadjimichef, D. (2023). A seesaw‐like mechanism for the
neutrino in the presence of a minimal length space–time. Astronomische Nachrichten, 344(1-2).
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.20220127
Frandsen, M., Masina, I., & Sannino, F. (2010). Fourth lepton family is natural in technicolor.
Physical Review D, 81(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.81.035010
Fratini, S. and Merino, J. (2009). Unconventional metallic conduction in two-dimensional
hubbard-wigner lattices. Physical Review B, 80(16). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.80.165110
Gavreev, M., Mastiukova, A., Kiktenko, E., & Fedorov, A. (2022). Learning entanglement
breakdown as a phase transition by confusion. New Journal of Physics, 24(7), 073045.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac7fb2
Granata, C. and Vettoliere, A. (2016). Nano superconducting quantum interference device: a
powerful tool for nanoscale investigations. Physics Reports, 614, 1-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.001
Hansson, J. (2012). On the origin of elementary particle masses..
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1211.3136
Hobson, A. (2013). There are no particles, there are only fields. American Journal of Physics,
81(3), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4789885
Honda, K. (2012). Graphical classification of entangled qutrits. Electronic Proceedings in
Theoretical Computer Science, 95, 123-141. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.95.11
Iguchi, Y., Shi, R., Kihou, K., Lee, C., Barkman, M., Benfenati, A., … & Moler, K. (2023).
Superconducting vortices carrying a temperature-dependent fraction of the flux quantum.
Science, 380(6651), 1244-1247. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9979
Inui, N. (2021). Casimir effect between superconducting plates in the mixed state. Quantum
Reports, 3(4), 731-745. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum3040046
James, S. (2022). Limitations of the standard model., 33-44.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871613.003.0004
Jian, S., Scherer, M., & Yao, H. (2020). Mass hierarchy in collective modes of pair-density-wave
superconductors. Physical Review Research, 2(1).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013034
Jordan, S. P., Lee, K. S. M., & Preskill, J. (2012). Quantum algorithms for quantum field
theories. Science, 336(6085), 1130-1133. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217069
Jozsa, R. and Linden, N. (2003). On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational
speed-up. Proceedings of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering
Sciences, 459(2036), 2011-2032. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2002.1097
Kaur, J., Bagchi, S., & Pati, A. (2021). Remote creation of quantum coherence via indefinite
causal order.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2103.04894
Kenneth, O. and Klich, I. (2006). Opposites attract: a theorem about the casimir force. Physical
Review Letters, 97(16). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.160401
Klimchitskaya, G., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. (2009). The casimir force between real
materials: experiment and theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(4), 1827-1885.
https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.81.1827
Liang, Y., Masanes, L., & Rosset, D. (2012). All entangled states display some hidden
nonlocality. Physical Review A, 86(5). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.86.052115
Loeb, A. and Weiner, N. (2011). Cores in dwarf galaxies from dark matter with a yukawa
potential. Physical Review Letters, 106(17). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.171302
Miller, D. C. (1926). Significance of the ether-drift experiments of 1925 at Mount Wilson.
Science, 63(1635), 433-443.
Milton, K. (2004). The casimir effect: recent controversies and progress. Journal of Physics a
Mathematical and General, 37(38), R209-R277. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/37/38/r01
Okada, N. (2020). Smart standard model with axion, right handed neutrinos, two higgs doublets
and gauge symmetry.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2002.07110
Oman, K., Navarro, J., Sales, L., Fattahi, A., Frenk, C., Sawala, T., … & White, S. (2016).
Missing dark matter in dwarf galaxies?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,
460(4), 3610-3623. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1251
Peebles, P. and Ratra, B. (2003). The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of
Modern Physics, 75(2), 559-606. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.75.559
Ricken, O. (2017). Searches for squarks and gluinos with atlas. Epj Web of Conferences, 158,
02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715802002
Roček, M. (2007). Supersymmetry and string theory: beyond the standard model. Classical and
Quantum Gravity, 24(22), 5726-5726. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/24/22/b02
Rogers, F. and Loos, P. (2017). Excited-state wigner crystals. The Journal of Chemical Physics,
146(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974839
Sawala, T., Frenk, C., Fattahi, A., Navarro, J., Bower, R., Crain, R., … & White, S. (2016). The
apostle simulations: solutions to the local group's cosmic puzzles. Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society, 457(2), 1931-1943. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw145
Shapir, I., Hamo, A., Pecker, S., Moca, C., Legeza, Ö., Zaránd, G., … & Ilani, S. (2019). Imaging
the electronic wigner crystal in one dimension. Science, 364(6443), 870-875.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0905
Steggemann, J. (2020). Extended scalar sectors. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle
Science, 70(1), 197-223. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-032620-043846
Turner, M. (2001). Dark matter and dark energy in the universe..
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812810434_0026
Wang, R., Li, H., Li, S., Regan, E., Wang, D., Zhao, W., … & Crommie, M. (2021). Imaging
generalized wigner crystal states in a wse2/ws2 moiré superlattice..
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-390032/v1
Witten, E. (1995). String theory dynamics in various dimensions. Nuclear Physics B, 443(1-2),
85-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00158-o
Yanuwar, E. (2024). Qudit concurrence and monogamy. Journal of Physics Conference Series,
2734(1), 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2734/1/012069
Credits:
This research was written with the assistance of claude.ai and scite.ai.
